Real ‘quote mining’ by theistic evolutionist. Evidence for gravity waves, really?
Release Date: 05/16/2014
If Big Bang and Evolution were true, God would and could have said so
Creation - Myth or Miracle?
A few inconvenient facts 1. Consensus science claims Big Bang and Evolution are fact – stellar evolution, solar system evolution by nebular hypothesis, life from nonlife by chemical evolution, humans and all other life by biological evolution. Also it is claimed that geology proves there was never a global flood. 2. Plain reading of Bible…
info_outline
What’s ‘inflation’ got to do, got to do with it?
Creation - Myth or Miracle?
Joni Mitchell and The Big Bang agree: “We are stardust, we are golden, we are billion year old carbon, And we got to get ourselves back to the garden.” The Bible says man was specially created directly by God, and created in His image. The Big Bang (BB) says the materials in our bodies were…
info_outline
Beauty in Mathematics – a visit to math class
Creation - Myth or Miracle?
How is it possible that man can develop mathematical ideas from pure thought and they match the world around us? The fact that mathematics works in science is a mystery. If man’s thoughts are just chemistry occurring in a brain that originated by undirected evolution, then it makes no sense that these thoughts can arrive…
info_outline
Neo-Darwinism is Dead – the Reasons
Creation - Myth or Miracle?
Why do evolutionary experts say “Darwinism is Dead”? The Altenberg 16 got together in an attempt to discover “the elusive process of evolution.” Why do they claim that the Darwinian formula of undirected mutations plus natural selection is insufficient? Here are a few of the problems: abiogenesis – life from non-life, no explanation, this is…
info_outline
Neo-Darwinism is Dead – The Altenberg 16
Creation - Myth or Miracle?
Desperate attempts to discover ‘the elusive process of evolution’ Attempting to discover “the elusive process of evolution” 16 evolutionary scientists get together behind closed doors at the by-invitation-only symposium held at Altenberg, Austria, in July 2008. While the evolutionary process remains “elusive”, what is quite clear is the failure of the neo-Darwinian formula of “random…
info_outline
The Primary Axiom is False
Creation - Myth or Miracle?
We’re on the radio in Boston (WROL 950 am) each weekday at 10:05pm. Boston is a major hub of medical and biological research, so today’s topic is especially pertinent to our Boston audience. Retired Cornell genetics professor, researcher and inventor, Dr. John Sanford wrote Genetic Entropy & The Mystery of the Genome. Dr John Sanford,…
info_outline
Why is deception necessary and acceptable?
Creation - Myth or Miracle?
True theories don’t require deception If a particular theory is true… that is it matches the world around us, then why would its defenders use deliberate deception in promoting it? Why not use real evidence? Why is deception an acceptable tactic? Darwin-Defending Historians Debate Whether It’s Justified for Cosmos “to Lie” for the Sake of…
info_outline
Planetary magnetic fields can’t be billions of years old
Creation - Myth or Miracle?
Earth & Mercury’s Decaying Magnetic Fields * Boy do the atheists have a problem: Real Science Radio co-host Bob Enyart interviews physicist Russ Humphreys on the Earth and Mercury’s rapidly decaying magnetic fields, and on Dr. Humphrey’s fulfilled predictions about the magnetism of the distant planets Uranus and Neptune. With Earth losing 10% of…
info_outline
Darwin’s Black Box – details matter
Creation - Myth or Miracle?
The details do matter In Michael Behe’s landmark book, Darwin’s Black Box – The Biochemical challenge to Evolution, he points to physical evidence that challenges the undirected (neo-)Darwinian evolution story. Using the examples of vision, blood clotting, cellular transport and more, biochemist Behe shows that the biochemical world comprises an arsenal of chemical machines,…
info_outline
Creationism, Science and Peer Review
Creation - Myth or Miracle?
Creationism, Science and Peer Review One of the most frequent statements about ‘creation science’ is that if it were really science, then it would be published in the mainstream journals. Now consider the fact that Newton, Einstein, Watson and Crick, were not peer reviewed. Newton, Einstein, Watson and Crick, were not peer reviewed Peer review…
info_outlinecontinue reading