loader from loading.io

674 - Medical Privacy in Will Challenges: A look from Gilbert v Girouard

Hull on Estates

Release Date: 09/12/2023

#692 - Black-Donaldson v. Estate of Helen Small show art #692 - Black-Donaldson v. Estate of Helen Small

Hull on Estates

This week on Hull on Estates, Natalia Angelini and Aaron Chan discuss a lawyer's responsibility to their clients in estate planning by examining the case of .

info_outline
#691 - Pets and Estate Administration show art #691 - Pets and Estate Administration

Hull on Estates

This week on the Hull on Estates Podcast, with Jonathon Kappy and Diana McBey discuss pets and estate administration. We discuss read more about the case .

info_outline
690 – Costs Considerations for Estate Trustees show art 690 – Costs Considerations for Estate Trustees

Hull on Estates

This Week on Hull on Estates, Nick Esterbauer and Darien Murray discuss costs consequences in estate litigation. They consider the modern approach to costs and review a recent example of its application in the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Westover Estate v Jolicouer, 2024 ONCA 81.    

info_outline
689 -  Roe v. Roe Retrospective - A Will Challenge show art 689 - Roe v. Roe Retrospective - A Will Challenge

Hull on Estates

This week on Hull on Estates, Doreen So and Kiran Sanghera discuss Will Challenges and the case of Roe v Roe.    Links: Insane Delusion  Banton v. Banton, 1998 CanLII 14926 (ON SC) Tate v. Gueguegirre The Challenge of Appealing a Will Challenge

info_outline
#688 -  Estate Freezes and Net Family Property Equalization. show art #688 - Estate Freezes and Net Family Property Equalization.

Hull on Estates

On this week’s episode of Hull on Estates, and have a follow-up discussion on Stuart’s about Estate Freezes and Net Family Property Equalization. Cases discussed:   Stone v. Stone, (ON CA)   Reisman v. Reisman, (CanLII)

info_outline
687 - Retract a Renunciation show art 687 - Retract a Renunciation

Hull on Estates

This week on Hull on Estates, Natalia Angelini and Haley Daniel discuss the retraction of renunciation of appointment as estate trustee. They analyze two recent court decisions Hunt v Hunt and Soo Estate and how this may impact the ability to retract a renunciation.   Links: Blog: Hunt v Hunt: Soo Estate:  

info_outline
686 - The Absentees Act and the case of Grover v. Vaid show art 686 - The Absentees Act and the case of Grover v. Vaid

Hull on Estates

This week on the podcast Jonathon Kappy and Geoffrey Sculthorpe discuss the The Absentees Act and how it impacts the case for Grover v Vaid, 2023 ONSC 5931.  Research Links: Case: Absentees Act: Declarations of Death Act: 

info_outline
685 - Sham Trusts: Exploring a Purported Settlor’s Intentions show art 685 - Sham Trusts: Exploring a Purported Settlor’s Intentions

Hull on Estates

This week on Hull on Estates, Nick Esterbauer and Doug Higgins review the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in McGoey (Re), 2019 ONSC 80. Through this unique case and its interesting evidentiary issue, Nick and Doug discuss the concept of a “sham” trust, and the principles applied by Ontario courts in evaluating a purported settlor’s intention to settle a valid trust. McGoey (Re), 2019 ONSC 80 (CanLII)

info_outline
684 - A Case of Moral Obligation show art 684 - A Case of Moral Obligation

Hull on Estates

This week on the podcast, Natalia Angelini and Diana McBey discuss a case from British Columbia, Bautista v Gutkowski Estate, 2023 BCSC 1485.  In a pivotal decision, the BC Court of Appeal varied a will in favor of an estranged son, recognizing the testator’s moral obligation. The case of Bautista v Gutkowski Estate reiterates the significance of moral duties in estate planning, especially towards one's children. Contact Us:  

info_outline
683 - Parental Support under s. 32 of the Family Law Act show art 683 - Parental Support under s. 32 of the Family Law Act

Hull on Estates

This week on Hull on Estates, Stuart Clark and Aaron Chan discuss a child’s obligation to support their parents under s. 32 of the Family Law Act.   Links to the cases that were talked about are: L.F.D. v. X. Stravino v. Buttinelli Godwin v. Bolsco Dragulin v. Dragulin   Parental Support – A child’s obligation to support their parents Contact Us: [email protected]

info_outline
 
More Episodes

In today's episode, Doreen So and Diana McBey discuss Gilbert v. Girouard, 2023 ONSC 4445, and how the Court may, in the right circumstances, protect a Deceased's medical privacy from those wishing to challenge their Will.

Follow us on social media:

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram

If you have any questions about an Estate matter, contact us at [email protected].