LQ PatentCast: SAP America v. Investpic
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
Release Date: 08/01/2018
Invention2Exit: Patent Case Study Interview with Lynette Robinson
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
Invention2Exit: Patent Case Study Interview with Lynette Robinson Lynette is a sought-after speaker & performer, entrepreneur, and business coach who specializes in helping entrepreneurs go from lightbulb moment to launched in a fraction of the time, so they can skyrocket their sales and create the life and business of their dreams. Site:
info_outline
Invention2Exit: Patent Case Study with Alex Hargrove of Netlaw
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
Craige interviews Alex Hargrove who talks about how he is buildng a fast growing business around his patented software technologies and developing a patent portfolio to protect his software. If you are interested in geting your own patents for your software patents, call (512) 649-1046 or visit us at or schedule your now. If you would like to learn more about Alex or Netlaw please visit them at or connect with Alex on Twitter
info_outline
Invention2Exit: Encouragement For Entrepreneurs
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
info_outline
LQP Ask The Patent Attorney: What is the key to avoiding office actions?
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
In this episode of "Ask The Patent Attorney," Martin Schweiger interviews Craige Thompson, JD, EE, PE. Craige explains the golden key to avoiding multiple office actions
info_outline
LQP Ask The Patent Attorney: How do you secure IP rights for a series of inventive concepts?
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
Summary:
info_outline
Ask the Patent Attorney: Thoughts on the America Invents Act
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
Summary: In this episode of "Ask The Patent Attorney," Martin Schweiger interviews Craige Thompson, JD, EE, PE explains his thoughts on the America Invents Act.
info_outline
LQ PatentCast: R & D Tax Credit
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
Summary: What is the R&D Tax Credit?
info_outline
LQ PatentCast: ZeroClick, LLC v. Apple Inc.
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
The patent, that was drafted pro se by a doctor who wanted to improve the patient charting process without having to click on a pointer, was not invalid on the grounds that it should be interpreted in means plus function form (if it were so interpreted, it would likely have stayed dead). Had Apple been successful, many more software patents would have been put on life support.
info_outline
What would happen if your top engineers walked out the door with a patentable idea?
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
What would happen if your top engineers walked out the door with a patentable idea?
info_outline
Ask The Patent Attorney: Is My Attorney Getting Me The Right Claims? (Part 2)
Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast
Is Your Patent Attorney Getting You the Right Claims? The first episode was about Litigation Quality Patent Claim Criteria. Today, we’re going to ask the other half of that question: what about claim scope? Am I getting Litigation Quality Patent Claim Scope when I’m filing my patent application?
info_outlineIn this installment of the Post-Alice Software Series, the Federal Circuit burns off some of the fog surrounding software claims at Step 2 of the Alice inquiry. The case of SAP vs. Investpic appears to directly answer, for the first time, whether a claim can lack the “inventive concept” needed to survive Alice, even though the claims are “groundbreaking, innovative, or even brilliant” as well as non-obvious. Now we know that an “inventive concept” cannot be found in the non-abstract realm, e.g., the claimed improvement can’t be an improvement to merely abstract “math.”