9/11 WTC Debate: Collapse by fire or explosive controlled demolition?
Visibility 9-11
On Sunday afternoon, March 6th, at the Boulder campus of the University of Colorado, Colorado 9/11 Visibility hosted a debate between Richard Gage, AIA (American Institute of Architects), and Chris Mohr, Denver investigative journalist and nondenominational minister. This is the audo of that historic debate....
info_outline
Red Flag - Saudi Government Suspects Protected at Every Turn
Visibility 9-11
Soon after the September 11th attacks, the US government actively tried to minimize and oppress information relating to a possible role in the attacks by Saudi Arabia. Ultimately, the 9-11 Commission of any role in the terrorist attacks despite many anomalies including the fact that were actually from Saudi Arabia.In December 2002 Congress released its’ Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry into the 9-11 terrorist attacks. When released, this document contained 28 pages of redacted information that allegedly pointed to foreign state-sponsorship of the attacks, specifically Saudi Arabia....
info_outline
Dr Frank Legge on Visibility 9-11: Mounting Evidence Shows Boeing 757-200 Impact with Pentagon Probable
Visibility 9-11
In this podcast, Dr Frank Legge discusses his new paper which was co-authored with Warren Stutt and has been published at the , titled Flight AA77 on 9/11: New FDR Analysis Supports the Official Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon ( http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2010/Calibration%20of%20altimeter_92.pdf ). In this lengthy and detailed discussion, Dr Legge is careful to lay out his way of thinking on the Pentagon issue and why it is so important to the 9/11 Truth Movement to not make unsupported claims about the events there. Legge looks at this issue from a purely...
info_outline
David Chandler Talks About His New DVD "9/11 Analysis" and Rationalizes the Pentagon Debate on Visibility 9-11
Visibility 9-11
Show notes and interview by: John BursillThis timely and important Podcast is a MUST listen!David who describes himself as a "pacifist" talks in great depth about his journey on the campaign for 9/11 Truth and Justice which he is passionately dedicated. Many of you may be aware it was David who is credited with getting NIST to admit WTC Building 7 fell at a an acceleration consistent with free-fall due to gravity; which I and many others view as the single most powerful debating tool for us as 9/11 Truth advocates! David disputes he is solely responsible for this and says that Jones,...
info_outline
An In Depth Interview with Bob McIlvaine - Visibility 9-11
Visibility 9-11
An In Depth Interview with Bob McIlvaine - Visibility 9-11Notes by John BursillIn this in depth interview with tireless 9/11 Truth campaigner Bob McIlvaine, we look at 9/11 in its historical context. We also hear about Bob's detailed research into what happened to his son Bobby on 9/11 and the evidence an explosion other than the planes killed his son.As a long term 9/11 Truth researcher (2001) , an ex-history teacher and someone who has worked in mental health, Bob has a unique perspective on society and it's drives. In this interview Bob gives us a insight into how he sees the...
info_outline
Red Flag - 9/11 Commission Ignores Pakistan's Money Connection
Visibility 9-11
Despite the 9-11 Commission's to provide a “full and complete accounting” of the attacks of September 11, many key points were omitted from the final report. One of these important omissions attempted to cover up the role of Pakistan and whether or not Pakistani intelligence helped to fund the 9-11 attacks.Ties between Washington DC and the Pakistani intelligence agency, the ISI have been documented in media reports before and after the September 11th attacks. In March 2001, Pakistani regional expert and member of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Selig...
info_outline
Red Flag -Transponders Not Required to Track Errant Aircraft
Visibility 9-11
Most people don’t realize that on September 11th, planes were known to be high jacked and flying around the Eastern US for over 70 minutes. After September 11th, many wondered why our air force was unable to stop the high jacked aircraft, especially American Airlines Flight 77 which struck the Pentagon. American Airlines Flight 11 was high jacked at 8:14. By 8:25 Boston that the flight was indeed high jacked and the aircraft of the World Trade Center at 8:46. At 9:03, United Airlines Flight 175 struck the South Tower and at that time, the whole world knew that...
info_outline
Red Flag - Young Man to Cheney, Do the Orders Still Stand?
Visibility 9-11
On the morning of September 11th, 2001, of the military response to the attacks while the President flew around the country in Air Force One. The 9-11 Commission failed to follow up on the nature of and order the Vice President had given which related to American Airlines Flight 77 which hit the Pentagon at 9:36. Many have wondered if these orders were NOT to shoot down Flight 77 as it approached the Pentagon....
info_outline
Red Flag - The Bush Administration Opposed a 9/11 Commission
Visibility 9-11
The Bush administration fought hard against the creation of an independent commission to investigate 9/11. The families who fought for the creation of such a commission, wanted full accountability concerning the event that led to the deaths of their loved ones. Yet, the administration resisted this. Why?...
info_outline
Red Flag - 9/11 Commission, Set Up to Fail
Visibility 9-11
Thomas Kean and , the Chair and Vice-Chair of the 9/11 Commission, made an astonishing admission in their book, . They said,...
info_outline
This episode of Visibility 9-11 welcomes back to the program, Physicist Dr. Steven E. Jones.
Dr. Jones is a retired physics professor and first emerged in late 2005 with his important paper Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?, and has continued to do groundbreaking research into the "collapses" of all three high rise buildings on September 11th, 2001.
Dr. Jones both sits as co-editor at the Journal of 9-11 Studies and is the founder of Scholars for 9-11 Truth and Justice. He has been a stalwart in the scientific and scholarly area of the 9-11 Truth Movement.
Our talks today with Dr. Jones features an in-depth discussion on a new paper which has been formally published and peer reviewed by The Open Chemical Physics Journal titled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe. In this revolutionary new research paper, discoveries made in the World Trade Center Dust, particularly the red/gray bi-layered chips, are examined in great detail and include evidence of the thermite fingerprint at every juncture.
The research paper ends with this sentence, which pulls no punches when it comes to what the authors believe these red/gray chips to be:
"Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material."
Dr. Steven E. Jones, co-author of the paper writes:
"In short, the paper explodes the official story that “no evidence” exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings." The red/gray chips are the "loaded gun" of 9-11.
Read this important paper directly at The Open Chemical Physics Journal website here.
Download these important episodes of Visibility 9-11 and here and here.
Find links to the research paper, these episodes, and watch for other planned interviews on this topic at our Visibility 9-11 Special Report, The Thermite Fingerprint; The Loaded Gun.