Is Attempt Armed Robbery A Per Se Forcible Felony? Hmmm?
Release Date: 09/14/2019
Kane County Nuggets
Scott’s Law in Illinois is the requirement that drivers slow down and move over when police cars or other emergency vehicles are stopped on the roadway. Scott’s Law Basically Says… Scott’s law requires that a driver proceed cautiously when an emergency vehicle is stopped and Move over and change lanes and/or Slow down if changing lanes is impossible. The law imposes enhanced penalties, a possible driver license suspension, and even jail time for severe violations. 625 ILCS 5/11-907(c) The exact language of the section provides that: “(c) Upon approaching a stationary authorized...
info_outline In 2020 Can Police Search Your Car If They Smell Marijuana?Kane County Nuggets
After Illinois passed the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act which became effective in 2020, can police still search a car when they smell cannabis? The Old “Smell Of Weed Rule” In Illinois Before Decriminalization Of 2020 The warrantless search of a car is authorized “where a trained and experienced police officer detects the odor of cannabis emanating from a defendant’s vehicle.” People v. Stout, 106 Ill.2d 77, 88 (1985) The question today, is if this rule survived the cannabis law change in 2020. In This Episode… “The officer would probably be better suited to try and find...
info_outline Chicago Police Body Cam Discovery With Peter Lewis: What To Do When You Don't Get ItKane County Nuggets
Episode 724 (Duration 33:57). Chicago defense attorney Peter Lewis explains what a litigant can do when their criminal discovery is missing the police body cam video. In This Case... The State's Attorney's position is if they didn't get it from the police then it doesn't exist. Attorney Peter Lewis Am I Entitled To Have The Police Body Cam In My Case? Yes. Generally, speaking a criminal defendant is going to be entitled to possess a copy of the police body cam or cams involved in his or her case. The interesting question is what to do when you don't get it. Attorney Peter Lewis Peter...
info_outline Illinois v. Caballes: The Police Drug Dog Sniffer CaseKane County Nuggets
. SCOTIS Notice (Duration 1:43) This is the SCOTUS case that set the framework for the use of drug dogs in the United States. [insert mp3 player] This opinion normalized the use of drug dogs by police departments during traffic stops. The case concluded that police don't need a warrant when they walk a drug dog around a car during a traffic stop. Issue Do police need a warrant to use a drug dog to sniff a car during a traffic stop? Facts Driver was stopped and ticketed for speeding. During the traffic stop, a canine unit appeared and a dog handler walked the dog around the car. The...
info_outline What To Do About Fatally Flawed Criminal Charges: Alan Downen InterviewKane County Nuggets
. Episode 686 (Duration 31:58) What's the best way to handle legally insufficient criminal charges? In this episode you get a feel for what it's like working in the criminal law. Subscribe: | | | | | Illinois attorney Alan Downen walks us through the detailed intricacies of just one issue in criminal litigation: In This Episode... "There's an old saying about losing your 'tall'. 'Tall' is your favorite marble." -- Alan Downen. Illinois Attorney Alan Downen Alan Downen has been a member of the Illinois bar since 1974. He's a solo practitioner concentrating...
info_outlinePeople v. Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 150146 (May). Episode 377 (Duration 8:07)
Attempt armed robbery is a per se forcible felony.
Facts
Following a bench trial, defendant Dewayne Brown was convicted of the offense of armed habitual criminal. He was sentenced to 8 years’ imprisonment.
Officers are drawn to a parking lot when a car alarm goes off.
In the lot they find defendant and his girlfriend smoking a blunt in their own car. Defendant gets out of his car, but is immediately handcuffed. Inside the car there was a purse. The purse was open, and the handle of a handgun was “sticking out” in “plain view.”
The officer testified that he recovered the weapon, which turned out to be a Highpoint “black 45-caliber semiautomatic handgun.” The gun was loaded and “contained one round in the chamber and seven in the magazine.”
He Fesses Up
Defendant immediately “stated that the weapon was his” and explained that he had put the handgun into Fain’s purse.
On the way to the station, defendant stated that he wanted to apologize to Fain for placing his gun in her purse. Later at the police station defendant explained where and how he purchased the weapon. Defendant had no FOID card.
Criminal History
The State also entered into evidence certified copies of defendant’s prior convictions, including
a 1998 conviction for attempted armed robbery,
a 2006 robbery conviction, and
a 2012 possession of a controlled substance conviction.
Defendant first challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.
Issue
Specifically, he argues that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that his prior conviction for attempted armed robbery was a forcible felony sufficient to satisfy the elements of the offense of armed habitual criminal.
Accordingly, because the State simply presented certified copies of his convictions and did not detail the circumstances surrounding his attempted armed robbery conviction, defendant argues that there was insufficient evidence that his crime involved the use or threat of force against another individual.
He submits that attempted armed robbery is not inherently a forcible felony and that the State failed to present any specific details pertaining to his attempted armed robbery conviction to establish that the offense “involved any kind of use or threat of physical force or violence,” such that it could be categorized as a forcible felony.
Armed Habitual Criminal
Section 24-1.7 of the Illinois Criminal Code of 2012 (Criminal Code or Code) sets forth the offense of armed habitual criminal and provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
“(a) A person commits the offense of being an armed habitual criminal if he or she receives, sells, possesses, or transfers any firearm after having been convicted a total of 2 or more times of any combination of the following offenses: (1) A forcible felony as defined in Section 2-8 of this Code[.]”
Forcible Felony
“‘Forcible felony’ means treason, first degree murder, second degree murder, predatory criminal sexual assault of a child, aggravated criminal sexual assault, criminal sexual assault, robbery, burglary, residential burglary, aggravated arson, arson, aggravated kidnaping, kidnaping, aggravated battery resulting in great bodily harm or permanent disability or disfigurement and any other felony which involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against any individual.”
The "Residual Clause"
Where, as here, an offense is not one of the specifically delineated offenses set forth in section 2-8 of the Criminal Code, it will only be deemed to constitute a forcible felony if it falls within section 2-8’s “residual clause” in that it involved “the use or threat of physical force or violence against any individual.”
Importantly, the Illinois statute that defines forcible felony does not require the actual infliction of physical injury; instead, the statute requires only the ‘use or threat of physical force or violence.
Accordingly, courts construing this provision have emphasized that it is the contemplation that force or violence against an individual might be involved combined with the implied willingness to use force or violence against an individual that makes a felony a forcible felony under the residual category of section 2-8.
Armed Robbery
Therefore, here the relevant inquiry is whether the underlying predicate offense is an inherently forcible felony to satisfy the elements of the armed habitual criminal statute.
Pursuant to Illinois law, a person commits the offense of armed robbery when he or she commits the offense of robbery, which is an enumerated forcible felony that entails knowingly taking property from a person or the presence of another by the use of force or by threatening the imminent use of force, and:
“(1) he or she carries on or about his or her person or is otherwise armed with a dangerous weapon other than a firearm; or
(2) he or she carries on or about his or her person or is otherwise armed with a firearm; or
(3) he or she, during the commission of the offense, personally discharges a firearm; or
(4) he or she, during the commission of the offense, personally discharges a firearm that proximately causes great bodily harm, permanent disability, permanent disfigurement, or death to another person.”
Attempt Armed Robbery
A person commits the offense of attempted armed robbery, in turn, when, with the intent to commit armed robbery, he or she takes a substantial step toward the commission of that offense. 720 ILCS 5/8-4(a).
Taking into account these statutory definitions, the offense of attempted armed robbery requires evidence that a defendant possessed the specific intent to knowingly take property from another by threat or use of force while armed with a firearm or other dangerous weapon and took a substantial step to accomplish that objective. 720 ILCS 5/8-4(a), 18-2(a).
Holding
Thus, by virtue of his conviction of that offense, defendant necessarily demonstrated the requisite contemplation or willingness to use force by virtue of the fact that he was armed with a firearm or other dangerous weapon and took a substantial step to deprive another person of property by threat or use of force.
The reviewing court then held that the offense of attempted armed robbery qualifies as an inherently forcible felony for purposes of the armed habitual criminal statute.
See Also
Episode 180 - Some Attempts of Forcible Felonies Are Not Forcible Felonies
Episode 126 - Aggravated Battery is Not Necessarily a Forcible Felony