loader from loading.io

LQ PatentCast: ZeroClick, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

Release Date: 11/02/2018

Invention2Exit: Patent Case Study Interview with Lynette Robinson show art Invention2Exit: Patent Case Study Interview with Lynette Robinson

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

Invention2Exit: Patent Case Study Interview with Lynette Robinson Lynette is a sought-after speaker & performer, entrepreneur, and business coach who specializes in helping entrepreneurs go from lightbulb moment to launched in a fraction of the time, so they can skyrocket their sales and create the life and business of their dreams. Site:  

info_outline
Invention2Exit: Patent Case Study with Alex Hargrove of Netlaw show art Invention2Exit: Patent Case Study with Alex Hargrove of Netlaw

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

Craige interviews Alex Hargrove who talks about how he is buildng a fast growing business around his patented software technologies and developing a patent portfolio to protect his software. If you are interested in geting your own patents for your software patents, call (512) 649-1046 or visit us at or schedule your now. If you would like to learn more about Alex or Netlaw please visit them at or connect with Alex on Twitter

info_outline
Invention2Exit: Encouragement For Entrepreneurs show art Invention2Exit: Encouragement For Entrepreneurs

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

info_outline
LQP Ask The Patent Attorney: What is the key to avoiding office actions?  show art LQP Ask The Patent Attorney: What is the key to avoiding office actions?

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

In this episode of "Ask The Patent Attorney," Martin Schweiger interviews Craige Thompson, JD, EE, PE. Craige explains the golden key to avoiding multiple office actions

info_outline
LQP Ask The Patent Attorney: How do you secure IP rights for a series of inventive concepts? show art LQP Ask The Patent Attorney: How do you secure IP rights for a series of inventive concepts?

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

Summary:  

info_outline
Ask the Patent Attorney: Thoughts on the America Invents Act show art Ask the Patent Attorney: Thoughts on the America Invents Act

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

Summary: In this episode of "Ask The Patent Attorney," Martin Schweiger interviews Craige Thompson, JD, EE, PE explains his thoughts on the America Invents Act. 

info_outline
LQ PatentCast: R & D Tax Credit show art LQ PatentCast: R & D Tax Credit

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

Summary: What is the R&D Tax Credit?

info_outline
LQ PatentCast: ZeroClick, LLC v. Apple Inc.  show art LQ PatentCast: ZeroClick, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

The patent, that was drafted pro se by a doctor who wanted to improve the patient charting process without having to click on a pointer, was not invalid on the grounds that it should be interpreted in means plus function form (if it were so interpreted, it would likely have stayed dead).   Had Apple been successful, many more software patents would have been put on life support.

info_outline
What would happen if your top engineers walked out the door with a patentable idea?  show art What would happen if your top engineers walked out the door with a patentable idea?

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

What would happen if your top engineers walked out the door with a patentable idea?

info_outline
Ask The Patent Attorney: Is My Attorney Getting Me The Right Claims? (Part 2) show art Ask The Patent Attorney: Is My Attorney Getting Me The Right Claims? (Part 2)

Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast

Is Your Patent Attorney Getting You the Right Claims? The first episode was about Litigation Quality Patent Claim Criteria. Today, we’re going to ask the other half of that question: what about claim scope? Am I getting Litigation Quality Patent Claim Scope when I’m filing my patent application?

info_outline
 
More Episodes

Although ZeroClick's finger gesture patents were temporarily brought back to life on appeal, Apple has ample avenues to kill it off permanently on remand back to the trial court in the Northern District of California.  The patent, which was drafted pro se by a doctor who wanted to improve the patient charting process without having to click on a pointer, was not invalid on the ground that it should be interpreted in means plus function form (if it were so interpreted, it would likely have stayed dead).  Apple does not appear worried.  Apple appears to have simply used the opportunity on a relatively weak patent to try to undermine a huge swath of all software patents that might have been subject to means plus function rules.  Had Apple been successful, many more software patents would have been put on life support.  However, the Federal Circuit reversed Apple's win below, and the result is that software patent claims are more likely to survive if they recite terms like "User Interface Code" or "Program Code," which makes them more likely to be considered sufficiently definite structure (like "circuit" is for hardware), and less likely to fall under the more challenging means plus function rules.