loader from loading.io

Ep. 146 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Apologetic Significance (Part 1)

The Freethinking Podcast

Release Date: 04/07/2021

Ep. 149 Molinism's TRUMP Card (Part 1) show art Ep. 149 Molinism's TRUMP Card (Part 1)

The Freethinking Podcast

Provocative title so I'm sure you'll want to listen. We discuss Tim's proposed acronym for the Molinist. After all, if the Calvinists get an acronym, why can't we? Seems only fair. This episode is the first of two episodes that follow along with Tim's article on the subject which is linked below. Hope you enjoy!

info_outline
Bonus Ep. 148 Tim and Scott Debate Definitions (behind the scenes) show art Bonus Ep. 148 Tim and Scott Debate Definitions (behind the scenes)

The Freethinking Podcast

While recording our podcasts discussing Tim's response to Guillaume Bignon, I realized I'd disagreed with something I'd written down on our notes. Rather than cut off recording to discuss it, I decided to keep the cameras rolling so-to-speak, and both Tim and I liked the free flowing discussion that ensued. So I figured, why not make it into a bonus episode? Since this wasn't necessarily meant to be released, keep in mind that not everything we say is our official positions on the topics at hand. We're likely both wrong at points in this episode (probably all episodes to be fair), and after...

info_outline
Ep. 147 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Apologetic Significance (Part 2) show art Ep. 147 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Apologetic Significance (Part 2)

The Freethinking Podcast

If you haven’t heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It’s a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim’s book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we’re talking about it. In this episode, we’ll talk about the fifth of what Tim perceives to be Bignon’s problems with his book: apologetic significance. Link to Tim’s Rejoinder:

info_outline
Ep. 146 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Apologetic Significance (Part 1) show art Ep. 146 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Apologetic Significance (Part 1)

The Freethinking Podcast

If you haven’t heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It’s a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim’s book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we’re talking about it. In this episode, we’ll talk about the fifth of what Tim perceives to be Bignon’s problems with his book: apologetic significance. Link to Tim’s Rejoinder:

info_outline
Ep. 145 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Theological Issues show art Ep. 145 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Theological Issues

The Freethinking Podcast

If you haven’t heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It’s a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim’s book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we’re talking about it. In this episode, we’ll talk about the fourth of what Tim perceives to be Bignon’s problems with his book: theological issues. Link to Tim’s Rejoinder:

info_outline
Ep. 144 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Philosophical Objections (Part 2) show art Ep. 144 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Philosophical Objections (Part 2)

The Freethinking Podcast

If you haven’t heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It’s a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim’s book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we’re talking about it. In this episode, we’ll continue talking about the third of what Tim perceives to be Bignon’s problems with his book: philosophical objections. Link to Tim’s Rejoinder:

info_outline
Ep. 143 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Philosophical Objections (Part 1) show art Ep. 143 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Philosophical Objections (Part 1)

The Freethinking Podcast

If you haven't heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It's a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim's book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we're talking about it. In this episode, we'll talk about the third of what Tim perceives to be Bignon's problems with his book: philosophical objections. Link to Tim's Rejoinder: https://freethinkingministries.com/bignons-review-of-mere-molinism-a-rejoinder/

info_outline
Ep. 142 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Historical Eisegesis show art Ep. 142 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Historical Eisegesis

The Freethinking Podcast

If you haven't heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It's a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim's book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we're talking about it. In this episode, we'll talk about the second of what Tim perceives to be Bignon's problems with his book: historical eisegesis. Link to Tim's Rejoinder: https://freethinkingministries.com/bignons-review-of-mere-molinism-a-rejoinder/

info_outline
Ep. 141 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Definition of Determinism show art Ep. 141 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Definition of Determinism

The Freethinking Podcast

If you haven't heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It's a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim's book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we're talking about it. In this episode, we'll talk about the first of what Tim perceives to be Bignon's problems with his book: his definition of determinism. Link to Tim's Rejoinder: https://freethinkingministries.com/bignons-review-of-mere-molinism-a-rejoinder/

info_outline
Ep. 140 Tim and Scott Discuss their Epistemological Leanings show art Ep. 140 Tim and Scott Discuss their Epistemological Leanings

The Freethinking Podcast

Finally, in this episode, Tim and I stake out where we tend to lean in the epistemological debates I've been talking about. Spoiler alert: neither of us takes a particularly strong position, but we point out what we believe to be the biggest issues in both sides. We'd like to revisit this topic again in the future, hopefully with some special guests to help us think through these things.

info_outline
 
More Episodes

If you haven’t heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It’s a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim’s book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we’re talking about it.

In this episode, we’ll talk about the fifth of what Tim perceives to be Bignon’s problems with his book: apologetic significance.

Link to Tim’s Rejoinder:

https://freethinkingministries.com/bignons-review-of-mere-molinism-a-rejoinder/