loader from loading.io

Episode 294: The Scandal of Philosophy (Hume's Problem of Induction)

Very Bad Wizards

Release Date: 10/08/2024

Episode 320: Forgive Me (Kafka's Episode 320: Forgive Me (Kafka's "A Hunger Artist")

Very Bad Wizards

David and Tamler return to one of their favorites, Frans Kafka, this time on his beautiful and distressing short story “The Hunger Artist,” a story that brims with metaphorical possibilities but also implores us to accept it on its own mysterious terms. Plus gooning. by Daniel Kolitz [harpers.org] [urbandictionary.com] [wikipedia.org] [kafka-online.info]  

info_outline
Episode 319: The Shadow of the Object (Freud's Episode 319: The Shadow of the Object (Freud's "Mourning and Melancholia")

Very Bad Wizards

David and Tamler transfer their libidinal energy to Freud’s 1917 article “Mourning and Melancholia,” in which he tries to understand what's going on with depression, attempts to distinguish it from normal grief, and arrives at some ideas that laid the groundwork for his later theory of normal human development. Plus, another blind ranking segment--this time Tamler gives David a list of rappers to rank blindly. Finally, in between segments we make an announcement about the topic of our next bonus series (it's gonna be epic).  [wikipedia.org]   [sas.upenn.edu] ...

info_outline
Episode 318: A PTA Meeting show art Episode 318: A PTA Meeting

Very Bad Wizards

David and Tamler share some brief thoughts about Paul Thomas Anderson’s latest masterpiece One Battle After Another before going deep on his most underrated movie Inherent Vice. We explore the many connections between the two movies - Pynchon adaptations, shadowy forces, snitches who abandon their families, the blend of comedy and political fatalism, and the intrinsic and external forces that threaten relationships and resistance to power.  [Note: some spoilers to OBAA in the opening segment but we note where they begin, and of course full spoilers to Inherent Vice.] A really fun...

info_outline
Episode 317: For Shame show art Episode 317: For Shame

Very Bad Wizards

What is the psychology of shame? Is the experience of shame a human universal? How can we investigate the nature of shame across cultures? David and Tamler dive into Richard Shweder’s “Towards a Deep Cultural Psychology of Shame.” We talk about the methodological challenges of studying shame in other contexts and languages, the virtues of ethnographic approaches, studying literature, and more. Plus, bloody hell are the Brits starting queues at pubs? Bollocks! by Will Dunn [newstatesmen.com] Shweder, R. A. (2003).  Social Research: An International...

info_outline
Episode 316: A Four-Letter Man (Hemingway's Episode 316: A Four-Letter Man (Hemingway's "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber")

Very Bad Wizards

David and Tamler go big game hunting and explore their first Hemingway short story “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber.” We dig into his characteristic themes of courage, cowardice, shifting power dynamics in marriages, and what it truly means to live a happy life. Plus, neuroscience may be complex, but can these AI generated neuroscience jokes tickle David’s funny bone? And a super timely discussion of an urgent issue: The Cracker Barrel logo. [apnews.com] [punsify.com] by Ernest Hemingway [wikipedia.org]

info_outline
Episode 315: Ceaseless Striving (Schopenhauer’s Pessimism) show art Episode 315: Ceaseless Striving (Schopenhauer’s Pessimism)

Very Bad Wizards

David and Tamler tackle the topic chosen by our beloved Patreon supporters in the first VBW madness tournament – Schopenhauer. We discuss his essays “On the Sufferings of the World” and “The Vanity of Existence,” their strikingly modern perspectives on human life and behavior and the influences Schopenhauer took from Eastern thought. Plus, David has Tamler do a blind ranking of movie directors.  [plato.stanford.edu] [iep.utm.edu] [full-text from gutenberg.org]

info_outline
Episode 314: The In-Betweeny Place show art Episode 314: The In-Betweeny Place

Very Bad Wizards

David and Tamler go long on McDonagh’s 2008 masterpiece "In Bruges." We talk about the terrific performances and all the weighty themes - sin, guilt, redemption, honor, language, and very inappropriate jokes. Plus philosophers talk about “sex within the discipline” and Tamler can’t handle it. [dailynous.com] [wikipedia.org]

info_outline
Episode 313: The Spontaneous Eruption of Now show art Episode 313: The Spontaneous Eruption of Now

Very Bad Wizards

David and Tamler try to wrap their heads around the metaphysics of past and future via the Borges essay(s) “A New Refutation of Time.” What does it mean to be a time skeptic or a time realist for that matter? If you’re a Berkeleyan idealist and Humean skeptic about the self, do you have to deny succession and simultaneity? The world, unfortunately, is real; and we, unfortunately, are Very Bad Wizards.  Plus for centuries philosophers insisted that you couldn’t measure qualia, but then scientists just went ahead and… measured it!   ...

info_outline
Episode 312: MechaSkeptic show art Episode 312: MechaSkeptic

Very Bad Wizards

David and Tamler return to David Hume’s somewhat slippery brand of skepticism, this time focusing Chapter 12 of his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Plus speaking of things to be skeptical about, we dive into a recent paper called “Your Brain on ChatGPT” – does neuroscience show that LLM users incur a “cognitive debt”? [wikipedia.org] Hume's Enquiry Section 12: [davidhume.org] 

info_outline
Episode 311: The Way to Dusty Death (Shakespeare's Episode 311: The Way to Dusty Death (Shakespeare's "Macbeth")

Very Bad Wizards

David and Tamler screw their courage to the sticking place and talk about their first Shakespeare play – The Tragedy of Macbeth. Plus we select 16 topics for our first VBW topic tournament suggested and voted by our beloved Patreon patrons.

info_outline
 
More Episodes

CD Broad called induction “the glory of science and the scandal of philosophy.” As a matter of habit, we’re all confident that the sun will rise tomorrow morning and that we can predict where the planets and stars will be tomorrow night. But what’s the rational justification for beliefs like this? According David Hume, there is none. Deductive justifications can’t give you new information about the world, and inductive justifications are circular, they beg the question. David and Tamler dive into the notorious problem of induction and some (failed?) attempts to offer a resolution.

Plus, an article about toddlers and small children who seem to remember their past lives – what should we make of these reports? And is "remembering a past life" and "being possessed by the ghost of that person" a distinction without a difference?

The Children Who Remember Past Lives [washington post.com]

Ian Stevenson - criticisms [wikipedia.org]

The Problem of Induction [plato.stanford.edu]

Salmon, W. C. (1978). Unfinished business: The problem of induction. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 33(1), 1-19.