loader from loading.io

524 - First Choice v. New Jersey

The Constitution Study podcast

Release Date: 05/25/2026

525 - The Frightful Despotism of Political Parties show art 525 - The Frightful Despotism of Political Parties

The Constitution Study podcast

George Washington warned us that political parties bring their own frightful despotism. From gerrymandering to primaries, We the People have allowed political parties to not only rule our elections, but to poison our interactions with their venom and hatred. Will we continue to let these private organizations drag the United States into the ash heap of history?

info_outline
524 - First Choice v. New Jersey show art 524 - First Choice v. New Jersey

The Constitution Study podcast

Contrary to what the Supreme Court believed in both the Roe and Dobbs decision, the question of abortion has not been settled in the United States. The case of First Choice v. New Jersey shows just how far some states will go to oppose the pro-life movement.

info_outline
523 - Marriage and the Fourteenth Amendment show art 523 - Marriage and the Fourteenth Amendment

The Constitution Study podcast

In 2015 the Supreme Court decided in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, that the Fourteenth Amendment protected the right for homosexuals to get marriage. In 2026 the State of Tennessee is working on legislation that points out that private groups are organizations are not bound by the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore by Obergefell.

info_outline
522 - Free Speech in Colorado show art 522 - Free Speech in Colorado

The Constitution Study podcast

In the recent case Chiles v. Salazar, the Supreme Court was asked if Colorado’s “Conversion Therapy” law violated the Ms. Chiles right to free speech. As is so often the case, the court agreed that the law violated Ms. Chiles free speech rights, just for the wrong reasons.

info_outline
521 - Freedom's Extinction show art 521 - Freedom's Extinction

The Constitution Study podcast

Ronald Reagan once said that “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.” Is this the generation when that finally happens? You may think I'm being hyperbolic, but I think the evidence supports the possibility that this is true.

info_outline
520 - Birthright Citizenship at Oral Arguments show art 520 - Birthright Citizenship at Oral Arguments

The Constitution Study podcast

Does anyone who is born on our land automatically receive citizenship? Not according to the Fourteenth Amendment, but that hasn’t stopped the courts from messing this up. Which is exactly what I expect from the Supreme Court in the case Trump v. Barbara.

info_outline
519 - Defining Election Day show art 519 - Defining Election Day

The Constitution Study podcast

Congress gets to set Election Day, at least for federal offices. But is Election Day defined as the day the votes are cast, or the day they are counted? That is the question in the case Watson v. RNC.

info_outline
518 - Legalized Theft show art 518 - Legalized Theft

The Constitution Study podcast

You’ve probably heard of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. But does the Constitution allow a county to take and sell someones land to make a profit? That is the main question in the case Pung v Isabella County.

info_outline
517 - Parent's Rights in California show art 517 - Parent's Rights in California

The Constitution Study podcast

California has been violating parent’s rights for years. While a recent Supreme Court case has been hailed as a win for the good guys, it is just a small step restoring the role of parents in the lives of their children.

info_outline
516 - Suing the US Postal Service show art 516 - Suing the US Postal Service

The Constitution Study podcast

Lebene Konan sued the Euless, Texas post office for what she claimed were there intentional failure to deliver mail to rental property she owned. The Supreme Court just said she didn’t have the right to sue.

info_outline
 
More Episodes
Contrary to what the Supreme Court believed in both the Roe and Dobbs decision, the question of abortion has not been settled in the United States. The case of First Choice v. New Jersey shows just how far some states will go to oppose the pro-life movement.