Ep. 123 An Honest Discussion About Race, Riots, and Justice (Part 2)
Release Date: 07/08/2020
Ep. 146 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Apologetic Significance (Part 1)
The Freethinking Podcast
If you haven’t heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It’s a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim’s book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we’re talking about it. In this episode, we’ll talk about the fifth of what Tim perceives to be Bignon’s problems with his book: apologetic significance. Link to Tim’s Rejoinder:
info_outline
Ep. 145 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Theological Issues
The Freethinking Podcast
If you haven’t heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It’s a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim’s book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we’re talking about it. In this episode, we’ll talk about the fourth of what Tim perceives to be Bignon’s problems with his book: theological issues. Link to Tim’s Rejoinder:
info_outline
Ep. 144 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Philosophical Objections (Part 2)
The Freethinking Podcast
If you haven’t heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It’s a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim’s book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we’re talking about it. In this episode, we’ll continue talking about the third of what Tim perceives to be Bignon’s problems with his book: philosophical objections. Link to Tim’s Rejoinder:
info_outline
Ep. 143 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Philosophical Objections (Part 1)
The Freethinking Podcast
If you haven't heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It's a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim's book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we're talking about it. In this episode, we'll talk about the third of what Tim perceives to be Bignon's problems with his book: philosophical objections. Link to Tim's Rejoinder: https://freethinkingministries.com/bignons-review-of-mere-molinism-a-rejoinder/
info_outline
Ep. 142 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Historical Eisegesis
The Freethinking Podcast
If you haven't heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It's a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim's book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we're talking about it. In this episode, we'll talk about the second of what Tim perceives to be Bignon's problems with his book: historical eisegesis. Link to Tim's Rejoinder: https://freethinkingministries.com/bignons-review-of-mere-molinism-a-rejoinder/
info_outline
Ep. 141 Answering Guillaume Bignon: Definition of Determinism
The Freethinking Podcast
If you haven't heard by now, Tim wrote a book. It's a good book. You should buy it and read it. However, some people thought it was a not good book. One person in particular, philosopher Guillaume Bignon, wrote a 50 page refutation of Tim's book. Tim wrote an article as a rejoinder to this refutation. Now we're talking about it. In this episode, we'll talk about the first of what Tim perceives to be Bignon's problems with his book: his definition of determinism. Link to Tim's Rejoinder: https://freethinkingministries.com/bignons-review-of-mere-molinism-a-rejoinder/
info_outline
Ep. 140 Tim and Scott Discuss their Epistemological Leanings
The Freethinking Podcast
Finally, in this episode, Tim and I stake out where we tend to lean in the epistemological debates I've been talking about. Spoiler alert: neither of us takes a particularly strong position, but we point out what we believe to be the biggest issues in both sides. We'd like to revisit this topic again in the future, hopefully with some special guests to help us think through these things.
info_outline
Ep. 139 The Problem of Skepticism
The Freethinking Podcast
In this episode, we take a closer look at some of the skeptical theories of knowledge (if it's accurate to call them that). We talk about pure skepticism and weaker forms of skepticism, and see that it likely isn't a live option, particularly for the Christian, to maintain such a strong form of skepticism.
info_outline
Ep. 138 Internalism vs. Externalism: An Epistemological Discussion
The Freethinking Podcast
In the second episode in our series discussing epistemology, we take a look at two opposing views on the nature of justification: internalism and externalism. I lay out what each of these views looks like and place it in the broader context of the epistemological project. Fun ep!
info_outline
Ep. 137 Gina Carano & Epistemology
The Freethinking Podcast
No, those two topics are not related, but Tim and I start out this podcast talking about the Gina Carano controversy. If you're not interested in that, feel free to skip to about the 10 minute mark for our discussion on epistemology. In these next couple of episodes, I'll be laying out some various views and problems in epistemology that I learned about while attending my first semester in my master's program. This episode introduces the topics and talks about my general experience in school so far.
info_outlineAdam Coleman, Timothy Fox, and Tim Stratton discuss George Floyd, "bad cops," racism, riots, justice, and Jesus! Ultimately, we discuss what grounds equal rights for ALL humans and provide some ideas on how to make things right.
Relevant Links:
https://freethinkingministries.com/if-you-think-racism-is-wrong-you-should-be-a-christian/