loader from loading.io

689 - Roe v. Roe Retrospective - A Will Challenge

Hull on Estates

Release Date: 04/09/2024

716 - Beirat v. Khiyal: An Issue of Standing  Re Claims Brought on Behalf of an Estate show art 716 - Beirat v. Khiyal: An Issue of Standing Re Claims Brought on Behalf of an Estate

Hull on Estates

This week on Hull on Estates, Stuart Clark and Aleida Prinzen discuss the Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Beirat v. Khiyal, 2024 ONCA 790, where the Court examines the issue of standing as it relates to claims being brought on behalf of an estate. See also David M. Smith’s recent blog on the case . Beirat v. Khiyal, 2024 ONCA 790 (CanLII),

info_outline
715 - Balkinsson v. Sandy:A Mother’s Gift Gone Wrong show art 715 - Balkinsson v. Sandy:A Mother’s Gift Gone Wrong

Hull on Estates

This week on Hull on Estates, join Natalia Angelini and Shawnee Matinnia as they explore Balkinsson v. Sandy, a case where a mother's attempt to reclaim gifted property was thwarted by her own text messages.

info_outline
714 - Digital Expressions of Testamentary Intentions: An Ontario Perspective show art 714 - Digital Expressions of Testamentary Intentions: An Ontario Perspective

Hull on Estates

In this podcast, Jonathan Kappy and Ruth Aruliah discuss the Saskatchewan case of Haines v Kuffner Estate, which explored whether the proposed will was a valid testamentary document despite it not being executed in complete compliance with the formal requirements of The Wills Act and whether the same outcome would occur if this were done in Ontario.

info_outline
713 - Impact of Probate show art 713 - Impact of Probate

Hull on Estates

This week on Hull on Estates, Nick Esterbauer and Megan Zanette discuss the possible legal and practical impact of probate, once granted, and the recent decision of Cooke Family Trust et al. v. Dioguardi et al., 2025 ONSC 370.

info_outline
712 - Hotner et al v. Norman - Financial Exploitation of Vulnerable Individuals show art 712 - Hotner et al v. Norman - Financial Exploitation of Vulnerable Individuals

Hull on Estates

In this podcast, Doreen So and Mark Lahn discuss the case of Hotner et al v. Norman, which involves a daughter who depleted her elderly mother's estate while acting as her caregiver. Doreen and Mark examine the case and discuss the intersection of family caregiving, fiduciary duties, and the remedies available where vulnerable individuals experience financial exploitation.

info_outline
711: Jackson v. Rosenberg – Severing a JointTenancy During the Transferor’s Lifetime show art 711: Jackson v. Rosenberg – Severing a JointTenancy During the Transferor’s Lifetime

Hull on Estates

This week on Hull on Estates, Stuart Clark and Aleida Prinzen discuss the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Jackson v. Rosenberg, 2025 ONCA 48, which deals with joint tenancy, the presumption of resulting trust, and the implications of severing a joint tenancy during the transferor’s lifetime. Jackson v. Rosenberg, 2025 ONCA 48 (CanLII),

info_outline
710: Tessaro v. Gore – The Ultimate Limitation Period in Negligence Claims show art 710: Tessaro v. Gore – The Ultimate Limitation Period in Negligence Claims

Hull on Estates

In this podcast, Natalia Angelini and Grey Wen discuss the case Tessaro v. Gore and the ultimate limitation period of 15 years which applies to negligence claims against will draft from the date of the act or omission, the negligent drafting – not from the date of death.

info_outline
709 - Johnston v. McLean – Consent Judgments as a “Species” of Contract show art 709 - Johnston v. McLean – Consent Judgments as a “Species” of Contract

Hull on Estates

This week on Hull on Estates, Jonathon Kappy and Boris Eng discuss the intricacies of consent judgments and their interpretation through the lens of a pivotal Ontario Court of Appeal case. Discover how contractual principles shape legal outcomes and ensure clarity in court-approved agreements.

info_outline
708: Preparing for LSO’s New Client Contingency Planning Requirement show art 708: Preparing for LSO’s New Client Contingency Planning Requirement

Hull on Estates

This week on of Hull on Estates, Nick Esterbauer and Mandana Niknejad discuss the Law Society of Ontario’s new requirement, effective January 1, 2025, for all lawyers in private practice to implement a client contingency plan. Nick and Mandana discuss what this means, explore approaches to effectively address the new requirement, and review some of the resources available through the Law Society’s website: .

info_outline
707 - Navigating Client Capacity Concerns: Insights from the LSO show art 707 - Navigating Client Capacity Concerns: Insights from the LSO

Hull on Estates

In today’s podcast, Sydney Osmar and Sumit Malhotra discuss client capacity concerns and review the recent helpful guide released by the Law Society of Ontario.

info_outline
 
More Episodes

This week on Hull on Estates, Doreen So and Kiran Sanghera discuss Will Challenges and the case of Roe v Roe. 

 

Links: Insane Delusion 

https://hullandhull.com/Knowledge/2017/03/insane-delusions/

Banton v. Banton, 1998 CanLII 14926 (ON SC)

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/1998/1998canlii14926/1998canlii14926.html?autocompleteStr=banton%20&autocompletePos=1

Tate v. Gueguegirre

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2015/2015onsc844/2015onsc844.html

The Challenge of Appealing a Will Challenge

https://hullandhull.com/Knowledge/2024/03/the-challenge-of-appealing-a-will-challenge/