loader from loading.io

ICE Just... Decided Millions of People Are Ineligible for Bail. This Is Bad. Like, Really Bad.

Opening Arguments

Release Date: 07/18/2025

The Trump-Epstein Legal Breakdown You Didn't Know You Needed show art The Trump-Epstein Legal Breakdown You Didn't Know You Needed

Opening Arguments

OA1176 - Six years after his death in a filthy Manhattan jail cell, Jeffrey Epstein’s disgusting ghost is now haunting Donald Trump--his former “best friend” of more than a decade. What are the “Epstein files” and why has the demand to see them turned MAGA world against itself now?  We go beyond the headlines to explain how one of the most notorious criminals  in recent American history has become this week’s top legal story so long after his death, and why DOJ’s recent efforts to cover for Trump should constitute a ten-alarm scandal. We then review Trump’s attempt to...

info_outline T3BE78: Following the Interpleader show art T3BE78: Following the Interpleader

Opening Arguments

Professor Heather Varanini has brought us our next question as we study for the Bar Exam!  If you'd like to play along with T3BE, here's what to do: hop on Bluesky, , find the post that has this episode, and quote it with your answer! Or, and look for the appropriate T3BE posting. Or best of all, become a patron at and play there! Check out the OA for all the places to go and things to do!

info_outline PORN LAW: When Your Kink Is Strict Scrutiny but the Court Only Goes Intermediate show art PORN LAW: When Your Kink Is Strict Scrutiny but the Court Only Goes Intermediate

Opening Arguments

OA1175 - How much of a restriction on your First Amendment rights is it to have to upload an ID to access an adult website? That is the question at the heart of Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the Supreme Court’s recent review of age verification laws such as Texas’s HB 1181. Matt explains how this newly precedential application of intermediate scrutiny to these kinds of restrictions on adult content could have real implications for the future of other kinds of unpopular speech. Then for more context we welcome Zeve Sanderson, the Executive Director of the NYU Center for Social Media...

info_outline ICE Just... Decided Millions of People Are Ineligible for Bail. This Is Bad. Like, Really Bad. show art ICE Just... Decided Millions of People Are Ineligible for Bail. This Is Bad. Like, Really Bad.

Opening Arguments

OA1174 - Matt is coming in hot from the front lines of immigration court for an exclusive firsthand account of how a new secret memo directed to ICE's attorneys is trying to unilaterally redefine immigration reality and prime the machine for a new era of mass detention well beyond anything this country has even seen before. In better news: an actual federal judge restores sanity in the surprisingly-difficult-to-locate federal district of central California, and a footnote on why some unexpected federal job openings might be good news for people who hate fascism. Maria Sachetti and Carol...

info_outline T3BE77: If a Chandelier Falls and You Aren’t There to See It, Did the Liability Even Happen? show art T3BE77: If a Chandelier Falls and You Aren’t There to See It, Did the Liability Even Happen?

Opening Arguments

And Professor Heather Varanini has brought us our next question as we study for the Bar Exam! If you'd like to play along with T3BE, here's what to do: hop on Bluesky, , find the post that has this episode, and quote it with your answer! Or, and look for the appropriate T3BE posting. Or best of all, become a patron at and play there! Check out the OA for all the places to go and things to do! To support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at !  

info_outline Let’s Talk Space Law! It’s Law, but From OUTER SPACE! show art Let’s Talk Space Law! It’s Law, but From OUTER SPACE!

Opening Arguments

OA1173 - More people have been to space than practice space law, and Professor Michelle Hanlon is one of its most important modern pioneers. Professor Hanlon joins to talk Star Trek captains, preserving historic sites on the Moon, and why she believes the mass privatization of space is--at least if properly regulated--the only way forward. , Michelle Hanlon, New York Times  (12/7/2024) (signed 10/30/2020) Michael O’Shea, The Walrus (8/13/2020) Check out the OA for all the places to go and things to do!

info_outline What a Surprise, the Racist Bastards Want to Denaturalize Zohran Mamdani show art What a Surprise, the Racist Bastards Want to Denaturalize Zohran Mamdani

Opening Arguments

OA1172 - It’s been two weeks since the Supreme Court decided that babies in only half of the US get to be born as citizens. We try to make sense of what they left behind in one of the most important shadow docket cases in history, and how concerned Samuel Alito should really be that the actual text of the 14th Amendment might still prevail in the end. Matt also considers how likely it is that Zohran Mamdani might lose his citizenship over his rap lyrics, and we wrap with a quick footnote combining two of our favorite things: bad AI in court and Mike Lindell. (6/27/25) (7/10/2025) ...

info_outline T3BE76: Accidental Evidence show art T3BE76: Accidental Evidence

Opening Arguments

Professor Heather Varanini is here to get us ready for the Bar Exam with the next question!If you'd like to play along with T3BE, here's what to do: hop on Bluesky, , find the post that has this episode, and quote it with your answer! Or, and look for the appropriate T3BE posting. Or best of all, become a patron at and play there! Check out the OA for all the places to go and things to do! This content is CAN credentialed, which means you can report instances of harassment, abuse, or other harm on their hotline at (617) 249-4255, or on their website at .

info_outline When You're So Bad At Your Job, You Make the Supreme Court Look Good By Comparison show art When You're So Bad At Your Job, You Make the Supreme Court Look Good By Comparison

Opening Arguments

OA1171 - Today's episode is a nice, fun departure from the doom and gloom. Oral arguments in a recent SCOTUS case went terribly wrong. And for once, it wasn't the court itself that was looking like a clown show. The case was and it involved disability rights. So naturally, I had to invite everyone's favorite disability rights advocate and all around all-star, Dr. Jenessa Seymour!  

info_outline SIO484: Lawsuit Alleges Voting Irregularities in 2024. Is There Any There There? show art SIO484: Lawsuit Alleges Voting Irregularities in 2024. Is There Any There There?

Opening Arguments

Hey folks, I'm taking a little time off! Hope you enjoy this SIO in the meantime. Thank you! Part 1: The Legal Stuff Dr. Jenessa Seymour is here to break down something that even our moms are spreading on social media: a group in New York claims to have uncovered discrepancies in the vote count for the 2024 election, and they're suing over it! Dr. Seymour hits ALL of the expert boxes for this one - statistics, voting rights, the law, and New York. Want part 2 early? Head to !

info_outline
 
More Episodes

OA1174 - Matt is coming in hot from the front lines of immigration court for an exclusive firsthand account of how a new secret memo directed to ICE's attorneys is trying to unilaterally redefine immigration reality and prime the machine for a new era of mass detention well beyond anything this country has even seen before. In better news: an actual federal judge restores sanity in the surprisingly-difficult-to-locate federal district of central California, and a footnote on why some unexpected federal job openings might be good news for people who hate fascism.

Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!