Killer Innovations with Phil McKinney
The $25 Million Perfect Presentation Picture this: You're in a conference room with 23 executives, everyone has perfect PowerPoint presentations, engineering milestones are ahead of schedule, and you're about to sign off on a $25 million bet that feels like a sure thing. That was the scene at HP when we were developing the Envy 133—the world's first 100% carbon fiber laptop. Everything looked perfect: engineering was ahead of schedule, we projected a $2 billion market opportunity, and the presentations were flawless. Six weeks after launch, Apple shifted the entire thin-and-light laptop...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
Every breakthrough innovation starts the same way: everyone thinks it's a terrible idea. Twitter was dismissed as "breakfast updates." Google looked "too simple." Facebook seemed limited to "just college kids." Yet these "stupid ideas" became some of the biggest winners in tech history. After 30 years making innovation decisions at Fortune 100 companies, I've identified why smart people consistently miss breakthrough opportunities—and how to spot them before everyone else does. Why Smart People Miss Breakthrough Ideas The problem isn't intelligence or experience. It's that we ask the wrong...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
In 2011, HP killed a $1.2 billion innovation in just 49 days. I was the Chief Technology Officer who recommended buying it. What happened next reveals why smart people consistently destroy breakthrough technology—and the systematic framework you need to avoid making the same mistake. HP had just spent $1.2 billion acquiring Palm to get WebOS—one of the most advanced mobile operating systems ever created. It had true multitasking when iOS and Android couldn't handle it, an elegant interface design, and breakthrough platform technology. I led the technical due diligence and recommended the...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
University of Washington researchers discovered something that should concern every parent: children who use AI to create can no longer create without it. And here's the concerning part: most parents have absolutely no idea it's happening. If you've been following our series on Creative Thinking in the AI Age, you know I've been tracking how artificial intelligence is rewiring human creativity. We've explored the 30% decline in creative thinking among adults, the science of neuroplasticity, and practical exercises to rebuild our creative capabilities. But today's episode is different. Today,...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
The most innovative creators don't use AI as a replacement – they use it as a strategic partner in a carefully choreographed dance of human and machine intelligence. Welcome to Part 4 of our series, Creative Thinking in the AI Age – on strengthening your uniquely human creativity while using AI as a partner, not a replacement. In Part 1, we explored the alarming decline in creative thinking as we've grown dependent on AI. In Part 2, we discovered how neuroplasticity allows us to rebuild and enhance our creative capabilities. And in Part 3, I gave you a practical 10-minute daily workout to...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
Humans who committed to four thinking exercises for 10 minutes daily generated 43% more original solutions than the most advanced AI systems. Welcome to Part 3 of our series, Creative Thinking in the AI Age – on strengthening your uniquely human creativity while using AI as a partner, not a replacement. In Part 1, we explored the concerning 30% decline in creative thinking as our use of AI tools has increased. In Part 2, we discovered how neuroplasticity – your brain's lifelong ability to reorganize itself – offers us a pathway to not just recover but enhance our creative abilities....
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
Harvard neuroscientists confirm: creative thinking uses neural pathways that AI can't replicate – and never will. Hello, I'm Phil McKinney, and welcome to my innovation studio. Welcome to Part 2 of our series, – on strengthening your uniquely human creativity while using AI as a partner, not a replacement. In Part 1, we explored the alarming decline in creative thinking as we've grown dependent on AI. We saw how our ability to solve complex problems without algorithmic assistance has dropped by 30% in just five years, and how this cognitive atrophy affects everyone from students to...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
Harvard neuroscientists confirm: creative thinking uses neural pathways that AI can't replicate – and never will. Hello, I'm Phil McKinney, and welcome to my innovation studio. Welcome to Part 2 of our series, – on strengthening your uniquely human creativity while using AI as a partner, not a replacement. In Part 1, we explored the alarming decline in creative thinking as we've grown dependent on AI. We saw how our ability to solve complex problems without algorithmic assistance has dropped by 30% in just five years, and how this cognitive atrophy affects everyone from students to...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
Our ability to solve complex problems without AI has plummeted 30% in just five years. That's not just a statistic – it's the sound of your brain cells surrendering. We are announcing a new series we are calling – Creative Thinking in the AI Age – on strengthening your uniquely human creativity while using AI as a partner, not a replacement. Today, we will explore how AI dependency is creating a pandemic of reduced creative thinking and why this matters more than you might realize. Look around. We've all seen it – colleagues endlessly prompting AI for answers, friends asking...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
In 2007, two designers struggling to pay rent in San Francisco had a seemingly simple thought: "What if people could rent out their spare rooms to travelers?" This question—posed by Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia—sparked what would become , a company now valued at over $100 billion that has fundamentally reshaped how millions of people travel. The power of their question wasn't just in identifying a market gap. It challenged fundamental assumptions about hospitality, property use, and trust between strangers. It wasn't just incremental—it was transformative. And here lies the innovation...
info_outlineThe term "innovation theatre" has become increasingly prevalent in today's competitive landscape. It refers to the superficial acts organizations undertake to appear innovative without genuinely committing to the hard work of genuine innovation. This misleading facade often leads to wasted resources, missed opportunities, and damaged reputations. So, how can you spot this illusion, and what can you do to foster real innovation?
Misleading Motivations
Innovation theatre stems from a desire for quick wins and external validation rather than a genuine commitment to innovation. Organizations often invest heavily in flashy innovation labs, prime locations, and top facilities, prioritizing appearance over substance. This focus on the exterior rather than the core innovation process is a telltale of innovation theatre.
Common Signs
- Flashy Innovation Labs with No Substance: These labs serve as mere showpieces, lacking the foundational research and development needed for true innovation.
- Hackathons with No Follow-Through: While hackathons generate excitement and publicity, they often lack a concrete plan for implementing the ideas generated.
- Premature Product Announcements: Some companies announce groundbreaking products that never materialize, creating buzz without delivering value.
- Frequent Rebranding of Innovation Initiatives: Constantly changing the name and logo of innovation projects can signal a lack of focus and commitment.
- Adopting Buzzwords Without Strategy: Incorporating trendy terms like blockchain, AI, or quantum without a clear implementation plan is another form of superficial innovation.
- Treating Innovation Funding as Optional: Viewing innovation as a discretionary expense rather than a strategic investment can hinder long-term success.
The Pitfalls of Innovation Theatre
Engaging in innovation theatre can have several negative consequences:
- Wasted Resources: Organizations spend money on appearances rather than genuine innovation efforts.
- Lack of Sustainable Progress: Short-term gains fail to translate into long-term success.
- Damaged Reputation: A lack of substance can lead to skepticism from stakeholders and the public.
- Missed Opportunities: Focusing on the facade of innovation means missing out on genuine growth opportunities.
- Cultural Impact: Innovation theatre can foster a culture that values style over substance, leading to cynicism and disengagement among employees.
The Benefits of Authentic Innovation
In contrast to innovation theatre, authentic innovation offers numerous benefits:
- Sustainable Success: Genuine innovation creates a pipeline of ideas that fuel long-term growth.
- Industry Leadership: Authentic innovation allows organizations to lead rather than follow, setting industry standards rather than chasing them.
- Better Resource Allocation: When we focus on genuine innovation, we allocate resources more effectively, which leads to higher productivity and greater employee satisfaction.
- Cultural Impact: A culture of genuine innovation fosters critical thinking, continuous improvement, and trust among employees.
Choose Authenticity Over Illusion
Innovation is not a strategy; it's a survival tactic. Organizations must move beyond the illusion of innovation theatre and commit to the hard work of genuine innovation. By doing so, they can unlock sustainable success, industry leadership, and a culture of continuous improvement. So, the next time you encounter an organization engaging in innovation theatre, ask yourself: Are they truly committed to innovation or merely putting on a show?