Killer Innovations with Phil McKinney
The $25 Million Perfect Presentation Picture this: You're in a conference room with 23 executives, everyone has perfect PowerPoint presentations, engineering milestones are ahead of schedule, and you're about to sign off on a $25 million bet that feels like a sure thing. That was the scene at HP when we were developing the Envy 133—the world's first 100% carbon fiber laptop. Everything looked perfect: engineering was ahead of schedule, we projected a $2 billion market opportunity, and the presentations were flawless. Six weeks after launch, Apple shifted the entire thin-and-light laptop...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
Every breakthrough innovation starts the same way: everyone thinks it's a terrible idea. Twitter was dismissed as "breakfast updates." Google looked "too simple." Facebook seemed limited to "just college kids." Yet these "stupid ideas" became some of the biggest winners in tech history. After 30 years making innovation decisions at Fortune 100 companies, I've identified why smart people consistently miss breakthrough opportunities—and how to spot them before everyone else does. Why Smart People Miss Breakthrough Ideas The problem isn't intelligence or experience. It's that we ask the wrong...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
In 2011, HP killed a $1.2 billion innovation in just 49 days. I was the Chief Technology Officer who recommended buying it. What happened next reveals why smart people consistently destroy breakthrough technology—and the systematic framework you need to avoid making the same mistake. HP had just spent $1.2 billion acquiring Palm to get WebOS—one of the most advanced mobile operating systems ever created. It had true multitasking when iOS and Android couldn't handle it, an elegant interface design, and breakthrough platform technology. I led the technical due diligence and recommended the...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
University of Washington researchers discovered something that should concern every parent: children who use AI to create can no longer create without it. And here's the concerning part: most parents have absolutely no idea it's happening. If you've been following our series on Creative Thinking in the AI Age, you know I've been tracking how artificial intelligence is rewiring human creativity. We've explored the 30% decline in creative thinking among adults, the science of neuroplasticity, and practical exercises to rebuild our creative capabilities. But today's episode is different. Today,...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
The most innovative creators don't use AI as a replacement – they use it as a strategic partner in a carefully choreographed dance of human and machine intelligence. Welcome to Part 4 of our series, Creative Thinking in the AI Age – on strengthening your uniquely human creativity while using AI as a partner, not a replacement. In Part 1, we explored the alarming decline in creative thinking as we've grown dependent on AI. In Part 2, we discovered how neuroplasticity allows us to rebuild and enhance our creative capabilities. And in Part 3, I gave you a practical 10-minute daily workout to...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
Humans who committed to four thinking exercises for 10 minutes daily generated 43% more original solutions than the most advanced AI systems. Welcome to Part 3 of our series, Creative Thinking in the AI Age – on strengthening your uniquely human creativity while using AI as a partner, not a replacement. In Part 1, we explored the concerning 30% decline in creative thinking as our use of AI tools has increased. In Part 2, we discovered how neuroplasticity – your brain's lifelong ability to reorganize itself – offers us a pathway to not just recover but enhance our creative abilities....
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
Harvard neuroscientists confirm: creative thinking uses neural pathways that AI can't replicate – and never will. Hello, I'm Phil McKinney, and welcome to my innovation studio. Welcome to Part 2 of our series, – on strengthening your uniquely human creativity while using AI as a partner, not a replacement. In Part 1, we explored the alarming decline in creative thinking as we've grown dependent on AI. We saw how our ability to solve complex problems without algorithmic assistance has dropped by 30% in just five years, and how this cognitive atrophy affects everyone from students to...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
Harvard neuroscientists confirm: creative thinking uses neural pathways that AI can't replicate – and never will. Hello, I'm Phil McKinney, and welcome to my innovation studio. Welcome to Part 2 of our series, – on strengthening your uniquely human creativity while using AI as a partner, not a replacement. In Part 1, we explored the alarming decline in creative thinking as we've grown dependent on AI. We saw how our ability to solve complex problems without algorithmic assistance has dropped by 30% in just five years, and how this cognitive atrophy affects everyone from students to...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
Our ability to solve complex problems without AI has plummeted 30% in just five years. That's not just a statistic – it's the sound of your brain cells surrendering. We are announcing a new series we are calling – Creative Thinking in the AI Age – on strengthening your uniquely human creativity while using AI as a partner, not a replacement. Today, we will explore how AI dependency is creating a pandemic of reduced creative thinking and why this matters more than you might realize. Look around. We've all seen it – colleagues endlessly prompting AI for answers, friends asking...
info_outlineKiller Innovations with Phil McKinney
In 2007, two designers struggling to pay rent in San Francisco had a seemingly simple thought: "What if people could rent out their spare rooms to travelers?" This question—posed by Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia—sparked what would become , a company now valued at over $100 billion that has fundamentally reshaped how millions of people travel. The power of their question wasn't just in identifying a market gap. It challenged fundamental assumptions about hospitality, property use, and trust between strangers. It wasn't just incremental—it was transformative. And here lies the innovation...
info_outlineIn 1878, gas lamp manufacturers celebrated their dominance, believing their industry was untouchable. But in a small workshop in Menlo Park, Thomas Edison made a bold declaration: he would create an electric light so revolutionary that it would make gas lamps obsolete. The press mocked him. Experts dismissed him. Even some of his colleagues doubted him. But 18 months later, Edison unveiled the first practical incandescent light bulb, forever changing the world.
What set Edison apart wasn't just his inventive capacity but his systematic problem—solving approach. His famous quote, "Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration," wasn't just philosophy—it was a blueprint for structured innovation. If you want to think like Thomas Edison, you must understand his methodology, which relied on systematic experimentation, market-driven innovation, and turning failure into information.
The Edison Approach to Thinking
Edison's thinking wasn't random; it followed structured principles that fueled his breakthroughs. Here are three core patterns that defined his problem-solving strategy:
- Systematic Experimentation
Edison didn't stumble upon great ideas—he tested thousands of possibilities. Where others saw failure, he saw data. Unlike inventors who sought a single, perfect solution, Edison methodically worked through every possible variation until he found the best one. This systematic approach now influences everything from pharmaceutical research to software development.
- Market-Focused Innovation
Edison understood that an invention wasn't valuable unless people wanted it. He didn't just ask, "Can it work?"—he asked, "Will people buy it?" This focus on commercial viability is what separates true innovation from mere experimentation. Think like Thomas Edison, and you'll focus on solving real-world problems with market-ready solutions.
- Failure as Data
Edison's perspective on failure wasn't just positive—it was strategic. His famous remark, "I have not failed 10,000 times. I've successfully found 10,000 ways that won't work," highlights how he treated failure as an essential part of discovery. He wasn't failing—he was collecting data.
How Edison Thought Through Problems
Edison's approach to problem-solving followed a repeatable process, which innovators still use today.
- Define the Problem in Market Terms
Edison began with the market, unlike other inventors who started with technical specifications. When developing the light bulb, he didn't just aim to create electric light—he calculated the exact price point and operational costs that would make it competitive with gas lamps.
- Break Down the Problem into Components
Edison knew he could tackle significant challenges more efficiently by breaking them into smaller problems. For the light bulb, he separated the challenge into:
- Finding the right filament material
- Determining the ideal atmospheric conditions inside the bulb
- Optimizing electrical current flow
- Designing a cost-effective manufacturing process
- Creating a distribution system for mass adoption
By thinking systematically, he made an impossible challenge solvable.
- Conduct Systematic Experiments
Edison's thousands of light bulb tests seemed like trial and error to outsiders. However, he used detailed experimental matrices to test multiple variables simultaneously while maintaining rigorous documentation. His team examined:
- Over 6,000 plant-based materials for filaments
- Different filament thicknesses
- Multiple current levels and voltage settings
- Various vacuum conditions inside the bulb
This structured experimentation ensured every effort contributed to progress.
- Rapid Prototyping and Testing
Edison's lab wasn't just a research space but a prototype factory. His team built and tested multiple versions of inventions daily, refining designs in real time. This rapid iteration process is the same methodology that modern tech companies like SpaceX and Tesla use today.
- Document everything
Edison knew ideas weren't enough—they needed to be recorded and refined. His laboratory kept:
- Detailed notebooks with every experiment logged
- Technical sketches and blueprints
- Market research findings
- Cost analysis reports
- Observations on failed tests
This documentation system helped prevent repeated mistakes and turned his insights into institutional knowledge.
Think Like Thomas Edison in the Modern World
Edison's systematic innovation model is alive today in some of the most groundbreaking companies:
- LEGO's Future Lab uses Edison-style parallel experimentation to develop new products, testing multiple prototypes simultaneously.
- SpaceX applies its rapid iteration model to rocket development, reducing the time between design and testing.
- Amazon embraces its market-first innovation, ensuring real-world demand drives every product launch.
- Corning Inc. continues to build on Edison's systematic testing principles, refining glass technology for over 150 years.
Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Innovation
Even the best methodologies can fail without proper execution. Here are three common pitfalls when applying Edison's approach—and how to overcome them:
- Analysis Paralysis
Some teams get stuck over-documenting instead of executing. Solution: Set clear time limits for planning (20%) versus execution (80%).
- Fear of Failure
Many organizations talk about embracing failure but punish mistakes in practice. Solution: Shift from outcome-based judgment to hypothesis-driven learning.
- Lack of Systematic Approach
Jumping between random ideas without a structured method leads to wasted effort. Solution: Use standardized testing protocols and maintain centralized knowledge repositories.
A Challenge: Apply Edison's Thinking
Want to think like Thomas Edison? Try this:
- Pick a problem—something in your industry or daily life that seems unsolvable.
- Break it down into testable components.
- Design a series of small experiments to test different solutions systematically.
- Document your results—both successes and failures.
- Analyze patterns and refine your approach.
What's Next?
Next week, we'll compare Edison's systematic experimentation with Tesla's visualization-based innovation. Their vastly different approaches offer powerful lessons for today's innovators.
Subscribe now and hit the notification bell so you don't miss it. If you found value in this deep dive, consider supporting the channel through Patreon or YouTube Memberships. Your support funds more research and exclusive content.
Think like Thomas Edison because the next breakthrough might be yours.