loader from loading.io

That's a High Water Bill

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

Release Date: 07/16/2024

How Particular is How Particular is "That Particular Part"?

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

Messy Masonry, Inc. was hired as a subcontractor on a new home construction. Their job was to install two giant bay windows overlooking a lake, but they ended up splashing mortar on one of them. When they attempted to scrub it off, the window was scratched. As for the other window... another subcontractor, Outside the Lines Painting, was hired to paint the window frames, but accidentally sanded part of the windows in that process. The homeowner found the scratches months later.   Notable Timestamps [ 00:00 ] - A construction scenario involves Messy Masonry splashing mortar and scratching...

info_outline
The Lab-Grown Mismatch: One Earring, One Surprise show art The Lab-Grown Mismatch: One Earring, One Surprise

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

An insured filed a claim for a lost diamond earring. The stud and its match were scheduled as 1.00 Carat each, “I” color and SI clarity, for $8,000. Her insurer asked Gemcor create a match. When we received the mate, we ran our standard test and found something unexpected: the diamond wasn’t natural. It was lab-grown. In the years since its purchase, the replacement cost for lab-grown diamonds has plummeted. But the insured believed they were both natural, and wants a natural replacement.   Notable Timestamps [ 00:58 ] - A client filed a claim for a lost diamond earring, but the...

info_outline
"You Can't Salvage My Mother's Ring!"

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

An insured brought her diamond ring to a local jeweler for a routine cleaning. The jeweler found damage and recommended filing a claim. Our team checked the original appraisal on file, which raised questions about the identified break. However, close analysis confirmed a different break in the girdle. The insured was entitled her to a like-kind replacement or cash if she surrendered the chipped stone. But, the insured does not want to surrender the diamond for sentimental reasons.   Notable Timestamps [ 00:52 ] - The insured's diamond had a girdle break, and while entitled to replacement,...

info_outline
Suicide, Arson, and the Intentional Loss Exclusion show art Suicide, Arson, and the Intentional Loss Exclusion

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

Warning, this scenario mentions suicide. The insured's 21-year-old son lives with them and suffers from depression. While the insured parents are away, their son goes through a breakup and decides to kill himself. He gets very drunk and douses the entire first floor in the gasoline they use for their lawnmower. He turns over a candle and goes upstairs to pass out. A neighbor called the police in time, and the young man was saved-- but the resulting fire consumed the house.   Notable Timestamps [ 00:10 ] - John shares a serious scenario that raises pertinent coverage questions. [ 01:22 ] -...

info_outline
Don’t Fall Down the Building Codes Rabbit Hole! show art Don’t Fall Down the Building Codes Rabbit Hole!

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

The adjuster on a hail claim receives a long list of line items that are "required by code." Once the old shingles are torn off, they find rot and gaps in the sheathing, and the contractor says a thicker sheathing is now required by code.    Notable Timestamps [ 00:10 ] - Ice barriers, drip edges, a double felt underlayment... Searching the internet only leads the adjuster spiralling down a rabbit hole. [ 01:30 ] - What internet rabbit holes have you gone down? [ 04:28 ] - With PLRB's updated Address Report, members can provide an address and specify details such as rafter spans. [...

info_outline
Posthumous Premium Payor show art Posthumous Premium Payor

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

The 100-year-old named insured died of natural causes. His daughter, the executor, inherited and moved into the home, continuing to pay the same bills—including insurance premiums. Four years later, a fire occurred, but the policy still listed her late father. Can it pay out?   Notable Timestamps [ 00:10 ] - The daughter continued to pay the premiums, but did not contact the insurance company to advise them of her father's death. [ 01:30 ] - Trivia Time! Who was the oldest living person? [ 04:06 ] – Insurance policies generally follow the insureds, as defined by the policy, as opposed...

info_outline
Sugar, Spice, and Everything Sand: The CGL Auto Exclusion show art Sugar, Spice, and Everything Sand: The CGL Auto Exclusion

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

A concrete foundation is crumbling due to a truck's sugar-contaminated sand delivery. Now, a court case hinges on whether the CGL auto exclusion applies: Did the damage occur in the truck or on the job site? Notable Timestamps [ 00:30 ] - At the outset, it seems the question (of whether the CGL or the BAC policy applies) turns on whether the damage occurred on the job site, at the concrete plant, or on the sand delivery truck. [ 05:01 ] - Sugar can be used in small, controlled amounts to delay concrete setting time, but higher concentrations can prevent proper curing. The contamination in this...

info_outline
[REPLAY] Detached Garage Converted to AirBNB show art [REPLAY] Detached Garage Converted to AirBNB

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

This is a replay of an episode that originally aired on March 19, 2024.     An insured’s detached garage burns down in a covered lightning strike, and somehow it’s not covered just because of a little side hustle? The PLRB crew hunt for coverage and find what the insurer can pay out on when an insured rents out their property without updating their insurance company.   Notable Timestamps   [ 00:17 ] - The insured remodeled their detached garage for use as an AirBNB rental, but never notified their insurer. The garage burned down, and the insured files a claim for the...

info_outline
[REPLAY] I Crashed My Bike Into a Tree show art [REPLAY] I Crashed My Bike Into a Tree

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

Is a recycle bin a “vehicle”? Does a car antenna ripping a coat fall under the Vehicles peril? How about a poorly secured wedding dress in the backseat of a convertible? If you occasionally win a biking competition, does the loss of your bike trigger business property coverage? Join Mike, Tim, and Alissha for the lightning round and discuss bikes, eBikes, sleds, boats, and more.   Notable Timestamps   [ 00:15 ] - The insured is an avid cyclist who occasionally wins money from his hobby. Another cyclist cut him off and he crashed his bike into a tree while at a park, destroying...

info_outline
[REPLAY] The Appraisal Process – Is it Still Useful to Resolve Disputed Claims? show art [REPLAY] The Appraisal Process – Is it Still Useful to Resolve Disputed Claims?

What's the Scenario? with PLRB

This is a replay of an episode originally aired on Apr 22, 2025. An adjuster working on a complex property damage claim closes the file, having paid out on the claim. Then they receive a notice that the insured is demanding appraisal. They call up the insured, only to find out that the insured has no idea what’s going on. About Our Guest Steven J. Badger, Partner, Zelle LLP [email protected] https://www.linkedin.com/in/steven-badger-467b0322/ Notable Timestamps [ 00:20 ] - The insured signed a form on a tabet, presented to them by the contractor, without realizing it authorized a later...

info_outline
 
More Episodes

Homeowner is relaxing one night, and all of the sudden there was a huge clap of thunder. It was so loud she thought it might have hit the house or somewhere in the yard … but everything looked ok. Six weeks later she got her normal water bill in the mail (billed quarterly), and to her surprise, it was outrageously high – $4,500. She knew she wasn’t taking that many showers and thought there must be a leak, so she called a plumber who came over, scoped a camera, and found a big leak underground next to the house. It looked like the underground pipe had burst open, not just deteriorated. The homeowner immediately knew what happened: lightning damaged the pipe 6 weeks ago. 

Notable Timestamps

[ 00:15 ] - The insured wants coverage for 3 things: (1) the water bill, (2) the plumber’s invoice for the camera inspection, and (3) repairing the underground pipe, including the cost to dig out the land and replace it with sod to access the pipe. Policy = ISO HO 00 03 05 11

[ 01:45 ] - Trivia Time! Where is the lightning capital of the United States? What is the study of lightning called?

[ 03:35 ] - Now for a multiple choice: Is it Coverage A, Coverage B, or Coverage C? The answer is likely C! The water lost is personal property.

[ 04:18 ] - Newer policies state that water is Property Not Covered, but older ones don't. This only applies to homeowners losses; commercial properties have an exclusion that likely applies.

[ 06:00 ] - Whether Lightning or Accidental Discharge from a Plumbing System (or Zeus?), this is likely a covered cause of loss.

[ 07:00 ] - Once the insured demonstrates a direct physical loss, the burden shifts to the insurance company. So, if the insurer wants to investigate further, the insurer would pay for that.

[ 08:45 ] - As long as the insured's investigation (the plumber's investigative camera-scoping) was reasonable, it is likely covered even if it occurred prior to the claim being filed.

[ 10:00 ] - The pipe replacement is covered, and replacement costs generally include anything required to get to the repair. Land is typically Property Not Covered, but it's not the land that suffered the loss. The cost of digging to the pipe to repair it is likely covered.

[ 11:05 ] - But what if camera-scoping didn't work, and digging to the pipe was part of the investigative process? And, what if the damage to the pipe turned out to be wear and tear? In that scenario, tear-out costs would likely not be covered.

[ 12:15 ] - No case law advises on what is needed regarding replacing the land.

[ 13:00 ] - In the wear-and-tear scenario, a specific provision may apply to lead to coverage for tear-out costs, e.g. if water damage was caused by the leak.

[ 14:30 ] - Tim provides a recap of the scenario and the points above.

Your PLRB Resources

Constant Or Repeated Seepage Or Leakage Of Water — Burden Of Proof – PCQ.2022.06.27.jem.a - https://www.plrb.org/documents/constant-or-repeated-seepage-or-leakage-of-water-burden-of-proof-pcq-2022-06-27-jem-a/

Structure Settled After Water Escaped From Pipe – Earth Movement, Water Exclusion – PCQ.2022.04.13.twh.b - https://www.plrb.org/documents/structure-settled-after-water-escaped-from-pipe-earth-movement-water-exclusion-pcq-2022-04-13-twh-b/

Water Exclusion Might Not Include Metered Water – PCQ.2018.02.26.dwf.a - https://www.plrb.org/documents/water-exclusion-might-not-include-metered-water-pcq-2018-02-26-dwf-a/

Employees of member companies also have access to a searchable legal database, hundreds of hours of video trainings, building code materials, weather data, and even the ability to have your coverage questions answered by our team of attorneys (https://www.plrb.org/ask-plrb/) at no additional charge to you or your company.

Subscribe to this Podcast

Your Podcast App - Please subscribe and rate us on your favorite podcast app

YouTube - Please like and subscribe at @plrb

LinkedIN - Please follow at “Property and Liability Resource Bureau”

Send us your Scenario!

Please reach out to us with your scenario! This could be your “adjuster story” sharing a situation from your claims experience, or a burning question you would like the team to answer. In any case, please omit any personal information as we will anonymize your story before we share. Just reach out to [email protected].

Legal Information

The views and opinions expressed in this resource are those of the individual speaker and not necessarily those of the Property & Liability Resource Bureau (PLRB), its membership, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. The information, ideas, and opinions are presented as information only and not as legal advice or offers of representation. Individual policy language and state laws vary, and listeners should rely on guidance from their companies and counsel as appropriate.

Music: “Piece of Future” by Keyframe_Audio. Pixabay. Pixabay License.
Font: Metropolis by Chris Simpson. SIL OFL 1.1.
Icons: FontAwesome (SIL OFL 1.1) and Noun Project (royalty-free licenses purchased via subscription).
Sound Effects: Pixabay (Pixabay License) and Freesound.org (CC0).