loader from loading.io

Two Experts Debate When You Should Take Social Security—But here’s the TRUTH!

The Power Of Zero Show

Release Date: 11/19/2025

Two Experts Debate When You Should Take Social Security—But here’s the TRUTH! show art Two Experts Debate When You Should Take Social Security—But here’s the TRUTH!

The Power Of Zero Show

Today’s episode revolves around one of the biggest financial debates among pre-retirees and retirees: When should you take Social Security? Host David McKnight touches upon the recent debate of two of the smartest voices in the field – Dr. Laurence “Larry” Kotlikoff and Dr. Derek Tharp – on this exact question. Dr. Tharp, out of the University of Southern Maine, notes that economists commonly recommend delaying social security benefits until age 70. Boston University’s Dr. Kotlikoff agrees and explains that delaying can give you a 76% higher monthly benefit compared to taking...

info_outline
What REALLY Happened with Kyle Busch's $8 Million Lawsuit against Pacific Life show art What REALLY Happened with Kyle Busch's $8 Million Lawsuit against Pacific Life

The Power Of Zero Show

David McKnight looks at what happened when NASCAR legend Kyle Busch reportedly lost $8+ million in what was supposed to be a tax-free retirement plan. The plan Busch relied on was built around an indexed universal life insurance policy. According to Kyle and Samantha Busch’s lawsuit, they paid more than $10.4M into several IUL policies issued by Pacific Life Insurance between 2018 and 2022. While these policies were pitched as a safe, self-funding, tax-free retirement plan, things didn’t go as promised…  Poor design, unrealistic expectations, a delayed 1035 exchange, and poor...

info_outline
The Financial Guru Hall of Shame--Who's Leading You Off a Cliff? show art The Financial Guru Hall of Shame--Who's Leading You Off a Cliff?

The Power Of Zero Show

David McKnight focuses on three of the biggest names in personal finance – Dave Ramsey, Suze Orman, and Ken Fisher – and why you should be careful with following their advice. David emphasizes that anyone trying to wring the most efficiency out of their retirement savings should focus on advice that’s backed by math… not soundbites. While David Ramsey is the right person for people who are making less than they are spending, the same can’t be said for his retirement planning advice. For instance, he claims that 100% of cash value life insurance sucks 100% of the time.  For...

info_outline
Suze Orman Says 3%, Bill Bengen Says 4.7%--Who’s Right on Sustainable Withdrawal Rates? show art Suze Orman Says 3%, Bill Bengen Says 4.7%--Who’s Right on Sustainable Withdrawal Rates?

The Power Of Zero Show

David McKnight compares the approach of some of the biggest names in personal finance: Suze Orman, and William “Bill” Bengen (the man who invented the 4% Rule). In a recent interview covered by MSN, Suze Orman declared flat out that the 4% Rule is dead since markets are volatile, interest rates fluctuate, and people are living longer. David shares the “origin story” of how the 4% Rule came to be – and its creator Bill Bengen. Interviewed by MSN, Bengen updated his research and concluded that, based on current data, a 4.7% withdrawal rate is now sustainable. David compares Orman’s...

info_outline
Why Dave Ramsey’s Roth Conversion Advice Could Cost You a Fortune show art Why Dave Ramsey’s Roth Conversion Advice Could Cost You a Fortune

The Power Of Zero Show

David McKnight discusses one of the most destructive pieces of retirement advice he has ever heard: that you should never do a Roth conversion in retirement or within five years of retiring. Dave Ramsey believes you should forego doing a Roth conversion if you’re within five years of retirement or are already retired – because of the so-called Five-Year Rule. The problem with this approach, according to David, is that Ramsey is misinterpreting what that rule actually means, in addition to confusing multiple rules and applying them to the wrong people. Ramsey’s advice, continues David,...

info_outline
Four Ways to Pay Tax on Your Roth Conversion show art Four Ways to Pay Tax on Your Roth Conversion

The Power Of Zero Show

David McKnight addresses something that can make or break your Roth conversion strategy: how you actually pay the tax. David kicks things off by sharing that Federal and state estimated tax payments are usually made in four equal installments: April 15th, June 15th, September 15th, and January 15th of the following year.  Did you know that doing a Roth conversion in December, like many people do, will lead to the IRS pretending that income was earned evenly throughout the year? If you don’t account for that, you could get hit with an underpayment penalty (8% of the underpaid amount)....

info_outline
I’m 52 Years Old and Have No Bonds in My Portfolio (Smart or Dangerous?) show art I’m 52 Years Old and Have No Bonds in My Portfolio (Smart or Dangerous?)

The Power Of Zero Show

David McKnight explains why he has chosen to avoid bonds entirely and why you might want to rethink how you protect your portfolio as you approach retirement. David kicks things off by illustrating the so-called sequence of returns risk. According to conventional wisdom, bonds tend to be less volatile, so they help smooth out the rough years in the stock market.  However, bonds aren’t the safety net they used to be. And over long periods of time, bonds tend to underperform stocks by a wide margin. David warns against “stuffing your portfolio with bonds just to be safe.”  The...

info_outline
Dave Ramsey is Right About Bonds, but Not for the Reasons He Thinks show art Dave Ramsey is Right About Bonds, but Not for the Reasons He Thinks

The Power Of Zero Show

David McKnight addresses something Dave Ramsey has been saying for years: “You should NEVER own bonds in retirement!” David points out that the tool that actually solves the problem Ramsey has been trying to avoid is the same one he spent years mocking on his call-in show: the Fixed-Indexed Annuity. Ramsey’s argument is that stocks outperform bonds over time – hence, bonds should be avoided as they’re “slow, underperforming, and risky.” David indicates what Ramsey is half right about, as well as something he’s missing the mark on… David discusses how bonds can act as a sort...

info_outline
What is the Power of Zero Retirement Philosophy? show art What is the Power of Zero Retirement Philosophy?

The Power Of Zero Show

David McKnight walks you through what he believes to be the retirement strategy of the future: the Power of Zero approach. Congress recently passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which makes the Trump tax cuts permanent. The brackets were set to expire in 2026, but now we’re told they’re here to stay… By 2035, the U.S. will need massive infusions of cash just to cover the interest on the debt of $37 trillion, not to mention Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and defense. When the Government needs money and no one else will loan it the money, it does the one thing it’s always done in...

info_outline
Greatest Retirement Mistake show art Greatest Retirement Mistake

The Power Of Zero Show

While on the golf course with his son, David McKnight got asked a question, by a couple of men in their early 70s, every pre-retiree and retiree wonders at some point: “What’s the biggest mistake people make when preparing for retirement?” Many people spend their entire career saving money in tax-deferred accounts like 401(k)s and IRAs. As that balance grows larger every year, it’s easy to get the illusion that all that money belongs to you, while a larger portion actually belongs to the IRS.  How much of that sum you ultimately get to keep depends on what tax rates happen to be...

info_outline
 
More Episodes

Today’s episode revolves around one of the biggest financial debates among pre-retirees and retirees: When should you take Social Security?

Host David McKnight touches upon the recent debate of two of the smartest voices in the field – Dr. Laurence “Larry” Kotlikoff and Dr. Derek Tharp – on this exact question.

Dr. Tharp, out of the University of Southern Maine, notes that economists commonly recommend delaying social security benefits until age 70.

Boston University’s Dr. Kotlikoff agrees and explains that delaying can give you a 76% higher monthly benefit compared to taking it at age 62. 

Since Social Security is inflation-adjusted and guaranteed for life, it acts as longevity insurance.

Hence, Dr. Kotlikoff thinks that waiting doesn’t only help you but your loved ones too.

Dr. Tharp isn’t convinced: he points out that only about 10% of workers actually wait until age 70 to claim benefits.

Overall, he sees studies that recommend delaying rely on overly conservative assumptions – they assume that retirees earn returns similar to Treasury inflation-protected securities.

With this line of thinking, if your portfolio is earning 5% real returns instead of 2%, then delaying your benefits might not look as attractive mathematically…

Dr. Kotlikoff cites Menahem Yaari’s 1965 paper, which suggests looking at delaying social security like buying insurance. It protects you from the catastrophic risk of living too long and running out of money. 

The debate continues with Dr. Tharp talking about the sequence of return risk. 

If the market drops early in retirement and you’re forced to withdraw more from your investments to delay Social Security, you can permanently damage your “nest egg”.

Even though he acknowledges Dr. Tharp’s point, Dr. Kotlikoff points out that most retirees have options, such as continuing to work longer, cutting spending, downsizing, or borrowing temporarily instead of taking benefits early.

Plus, he adds, the people most affected by sequence of returns risk are, generally, wealthier households…

Dr. Tharp concludes the debate by citing a study showing that retirees tend to spend about 80% of predictable income streams like Social Security or pensions, but only about 50% of portfolio income.

He also brings up Bill Perkins’ book Die With Zero into the conversation.

Perkins believes that Americans often focus too much on lifespan and not enough on health span.

Dr. Kotlikoff responds by stressing that some people underspend, while others overspend… and that’s exactly why there's a need for good planning software.

For David, both Dr. Kotlikoff and Dr. Tharp make valid points, and it all boils down to a key question: how long are you going to live?

If you’re likely to die at 63, then you should probably take Social Security at 62. If you’re going to live to age 100, it makes sense to wait until you’re 70.

While there’s no accurate way to determine that, there’s currently a group of people who are in the business of figuring that out: life insurance actuaries.

David shares two reasons why you may want to consider the additional benefits of life insurance, especially Indexed Universal Life (IUL).  

 

 

Mentioned in this episode:

David’s new book, available now for pre-order: The Secret Order of Millionaires

David’s national bestselling book: The Guru Gap: How America’s Financial Gurus Are Leading You Astray, and How to Get Back on Track

Tax-Free Income for Life: A Step-by-Step Plan for a Secure Retirement by David McKnight

DavidMcKnight.com

DavidMcKnightBooks.com

PowerOfZero.com (free video series)

@mcknightandco on Twitter 

@davidcmcknight on Instagram

David McKnight on YouTube

Get David's Tax-free Tool Kit at taxfreetoolkit.com