Episode 380 Can We Solve Global Warming in Time?
Release Date: 12/02/2021
projectsavetheworld's podcast
The Indigenous social and climate change activist Jacob Johns and host John Feffer discuss the impact of fossil fuel power and the solidarity witnessed at the COP meeting. Johns holds out a vision of eight "hubs" for future templates of teaching farms around the world where ecology can be defended.
info_outlineprojectsavetheworld's podcast
info_outlineprojectsavetheworld's podcast
Valerie Percival has worked helping refugees in conflict zones. Michael Lynk was UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Occupied Palestine. They discuss Gazans' deprivation of the right to health.
info_outlineprojectsavetheworld's podcast
info_outlineprojectsavetheworld's podcast
Alan Gadian discusses early Marine Cloud Brightening research by John Latham and Stephen Salter. Robert Tulip and Peter Wadhams are also engaged in this research.
info_outlineprojectsavetheworld's podcast
info_outlineprojectsavetheworld's podcast
Lloyd Axworthy, along with Allan Rock and Fen Hampson, had initiataed the proposal to use Russia's in vestments in Canada as reparations to Ukraine. So what happened to that idea?
info_outlineprojectsavetheworld's podcast
This episode discusses the costs of transitioning from fossil fuels with Tom Athanasiou and host John Feffer, suggesting a 'Fair Share' approach for emissions accountability.
info_outlineprojectsavetheworld's podcast
info_outlineprojectsavetheworld's podcast
In this episode, Jose Pablo Baraybar and Apostolos Veizis discuss the plight of individuals who have fled their countries seeking safety but faced tragic outcomes. For the video and audio podcast,
info_outlineMark Z. Jacobson, a Stanford professor, has developed a model showing how it is feasible for the world to shift to 100 percent clean, renewable energy. His model takes account of the emissions from fossil fuels, of course, but also other pollutants that affect public health. When you combine these effects, it is apparent that the transition to clean energy will be a lifesaver and a great saver of energy too. Jacobson opposes the investment in nuclear power, which is far from lacking its own carbon emissions, when you count the work involved in mining, transporting, processing, and hiding and guarding the ingredients. Moreover, nuclear is far more expensive and will take far too long to create additional plants. Jacobson criticizes the US new infrastructure bill as containing many flaws, most of the “pork barrel” features. The question that Metta raises is whether public opinion and political structures can change quickly enough to meet the timeline for restraining the world's temperature in the time frame that has been accepted in COP meetings. Jacobson says that is is possible, and that 60 countries are on track to meet their pledges, but Metta continues to regard this as overly optimistic, and to argue that other methods are needed to give us additional time; these include cloud brightening and iron salt aerosols. This debate will. continue. For the video, audio podcast, transcript, comments: https://tosavetheworld.ca/episode-380-can-we-solve-global-warming-in-time/