loader from loading.io

Rationally Speaking #241 - Thibault Le Texier on "Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment"

Rationally Speaking Podcast

Release Date: 10/15/2019

Is cash the best way to help the poor? (Michael Faye) show art Is cash the best way to help the poor? (Michael Faye)

Rationally Speaking Podcast

Donors often dislike the idea of simply giving poor people cash, but it's usually the best way to help. Michael Faye (president of GiveDirectly) makes the philosophical and empirical case for cash transfers.

info_outline
Humanity on the precipice (Toby Ord) show art Humanity on the precipice (Toby Ord)

Rationally Speaking Podcast

Humanity could thrive for millions of years -- unless our future is cut short by an existential catastrophe. Oxford philosopher Toby Ord discusses the possible risks we face, including climate change, pandemics, and artificial intelligence.

info_outline
Dangerous biological research - is it worth it? (Kevin Esvelt) show art Dangerous biological research - is it worth it? (Kevin Esvelt)

Rationally Speaking Podcast

Kevin Esvelt, a scientist at MIT, argues that research intended to prevent pandemics is actually putting us in a lot more danger. Also discussed: Kevin's own research on engineering wild animal species. Are the risks worth the benefits?

info_outline
Why we're polarized (Ezra Klein) show art Why we're polarized (Ezra Klein)

Rationally Speaking Podcast

Ezra Klein explains how Republican and Democrats in the US became so different from each other, ideologically and demographically, and why that trend + our institutions =  political gridlock.

info_outline
The genetic lottery (Kathryn Paige Harden) show art The genetic lottery (Kathryn Paige Harden)

Rationally Speaking Podcast

Kathryn Paige Harden, author of “The Genetic Lottery: Why DNA Matters for Social Equality” explains what scientists have learned about how our genes affect our educational success. Why is this research so controversial? And is it worth doing anyway?

info_outline
How to reason about COVID, and other hard things (Kelsey Piper) show art How to reason about COVID, and other hard things (Kelsey Piper)

Rationally Speaking Podcast

Kelsey Piper (Vox) shares lessons from covering COVID: What has she been wrong about? How much can we trust the CDC? How good is the evidence for drugs like Fluvoxamine or Ivermectin? Should people try to evaluate evidence themselves - or defer to experts?

info_outline
"Price gouging" in emergencies

Rationally Speaking Podcast

Two economists -- Raymond Niles and Amihai Glazer -- defend “price gouging” in emergencies (when sellers raise prices on important goods, like masks and hand sanitizer during COVID). Julia raises potential counterarguments.

info_outline
How to be a data detective (Tim Harford) show art How to be a data detective (Tim Harford)

Rationally Speaking Podcast

You shouldn't blindly accept every statistic you read -- but neither should you dismiss everything you disagree with. Tim Harford, author of The Data Detective: Ten Easy Rules to Make Sense of Statistics, talks about the heuristics he follows.

info_outline
Are Uber and Lyft drivers being exploited? show art Are Uber and Lyft drivers being exploited?

Rationally Speaking Podcast

How much do Uber and Lyft drivers really earn? Are they getting a raw deal by being classified as independent contractors? I explore the contentious debate over these questions with three guests: Louis Hyman, Veena Dubal, and Harry Campbell.

info_outline
Unfair laws / Why judges should be originalists (William Baude) show art Unfair laws / Why judges should be originalists (William Baude)

Rationally Speaking Podcast

Law professor William Baude explains how widely-hated laws like qualified immunity came to be and why they're so hard to change. Also, Baude makes the case that judges should base their rulings on the original meaning of the Constitution.

info_outline
 
More Episodes
The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most famous psychology experiments in history. For decades, we've been told that it proves how regular people easily turn sadistic when they are asked to role play as prison guards. But the story now appears to be mostly fraudulent. Thibault Le Texier is a researcher who dug into the Stanford archives and learned that the "prison guards" were actually told how to behave in order to support the experimenters' thesis. On this episode, Thibault and Julia discuss his findings, how the experimenters got away with such a significant misrepresentation for so long, and what this whole affair says about the field of psychology.