How Should Antitrust Tackle Acquisitions of Nascent Competitors? A Conversation With 2020 Jerry S. Cohen Award Winner for Antitrust Scholarship, Scott Hemphill
Release Date: 02/14/2022
Ruled by Reason
In this episode of Ruled by Reason, guest host , Professor of Law and the William C. Oltman Professor of Teaching Excellence at Seattle University School of Law, sits down with , Assistant Professor of Law at NYU Law School. The two discuss Francis’s award-winning article, . Professor Francis’s article won the 23rd Annual Jerry S. Cohen Memorial Fund Writing Award, presented on May 29 at AAI’s 2025 Annual Policy Conference, . The article demonstrates that conditional dealing should be recognized as its own, separate form of monopolistic conduct rather than squeezed into ill-fitting...
info_outlineRuled by Reason
On this episode of Ruled by Reason, AAI Senior Counsel David O. Fisher chats with legal scholar Giovanna Massarotto about what antitrust law can learn from computer science, and particularly how understanding agreement algorithms can help courts and enforcers police algorithmic price-fixing and other illegal agreements under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The conversation centers on Massarotto’s recent paper, , which examines the characteristics of agreement algorithms and how they can inform the “plus factor” analysis courts use to determine the likelihood of an illegal...
info_outlineRuled by Reason
On this episode of Ruled by Reason, AAI Senior Counsel David O. Fisher chats with economist Edoardo Peruzzi and antitrust scholar Christine Bartholomew about the role of Daubert challenges in antitrust suits, focusing on the increasing role of Daubert as a gatekeeping device that may be hindering private antitrust enforcement. The conversation begins with an examination of Peruzzi’s recent working paper, which finds that Daubert challenges have become more frequent in antitrust cases and that, although plaintiffs’ experts are challenged more frequently, defendants’ experts are more often...
info_outlineRuled by Reason
On this episode of Ruled by Reason, Emily Bridges of the Food and Agriculture Impact Project has a wide-ranging discussion with antitrust scholar Peter Carstensen about the role of information exchange in restricting competition in agricultural markets, focusing on how the DOJ’s case against Agri-Stats addresses that threat. After covering the oligopolistic nature of many agricultural markets (2:45), the two do a deep dive on why information exchange can be so harmful to competition (11:04). Professor Carstensen explains how the law on information exchange has evolved and how that history...
info_outlineRuled by Reason
In this episode of Ruled by Reason, AAI President Randy Stutz sits down with . The two discuss how Green found his way to the USDA after beginning his career as a corporate securities lawyer and developing policy expertise in the financial sector (2:46), the new role created for a competition advisor at USDA (9:25), USDA’s tools for implementing President Biden’s Executive Order on Promoting Competition (11:02), USDA’s coordination with the USPTO to strengthen patent quality and promote competition in seeds markets (29:25), USDA’s coordination with the Antitrust Division of the DOJ to...
info_outlineRuled by Reason
In this episode of Ruled by Reason, guest host , the Robert A. Bandeen Distinguished Professor of Economics at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business, sits down with Professor to discuss his award-winning article, . Professor Ederer is the Allen and Kelli Questrom Professor in Markets, Public Policy & Law at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business. His article, co-authored with Professors and of the IESE Business School and of the University of Oxford Saïd Business School, won the 22nd Annual Jerry S. Cohen Memorial Fund Writing Award, presented on May 22 at...
info_outlineRuled by Reason
In this episode of Ruled by Reason, AAI goes international! Enforcers from the U.S., New Zealand, UK and Chile talk with Kathleen Bradish, Vice President and Director of Legal Advocacy, about their agencies’ cross-border work to stop price-fixing cartels. Leah McCoy, Juan Correa, Louise Baner, and Grant Chamberlain, whose agencies are heading up the International Competition Network’s Cartel Working Group, tell us about the important role of the CWG in advancing cross-border enforcement and give us a preview of some of CWG’s exciting new projects. These include initiatives that reflect...
info_outlineRuled by Reason
On this episode of Ruled by Reason, we explore the ramifications of the Google search case from a unique perspective—the rival search engines that have been directly affected by Google’s alleged monopolistic conduct. As the antitrust world eagerly awaits a decision this spring, AAI’s Kathleen Bradish interviews DuckDuckGo's Kamyl Bazbaz, VP of Communications and Public Affairs, about his impressions of the recently argued case. This episode unpacks how Google’s conduct, including “marathon” sized payments to OEMs to ensure default status, cuts rivals off from major access points...
info_outlineRuled by Reason
On this episode of Ruled by Reason, AAI’s Kathleen Bradish talks with Open Market’s Sandeep Vaheesan and the American Economic Liberties Project’s Erik Peinert about the pro-enforcement community’s views on the draft Merger Guidelines recently released by the FTC and DOJ. This is a wide-ranging and in-depth discussion about how the proposed changes succeed in advancing better merger enforcement, where they fall short, and what beneficial modifications could be made to the final version. Using each organization’s comments to the draft Guidelines as the jumping off point, Bradish talks...
info_outlineRuled by Reason
In this episode of Ruled by Reason, guest host Roger Noll, Professor of Economics, Emeritus, at Stanford University and AAI Advisor sits down with Erik Hovenkamp to chat about his award-winning article ” (131 Yale L.J. 1483 (2022)). Professor Hovenkamp is Assistant Professor at the USC Gould School of Law. His article argues that the law on exclusive dealing has failed to distinguish between “primary” and “secondary” refusals to deal. The article explains that the suffocating evidentiary requirements imposed on refusal to deal claims should not be applied to secondary...
info_outline