loader from loading.io

Lobbying Series Part 4 - Lobbying Exceptions

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

Release Date: 02/24/2021

Individual Activity During Election Season show art Individual Activity During Election Season

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

On today’s episode, we dive into rules surrounding partisan activities for employees of 501(c)(3) organizations. With the election just around the corner, we will give you some best practices for how to keep your 501(c)(3) safe from any partisan activity while you engage in electoral work as an individual.       Attorneys for this Episode Melissa Marichal Zayas  Brittany Hacker  Victor Rivera Labiosa    Shownotes  Rules for 501(c)(3) organizations   Remain nonpartisan when acting on behalf of your 501(c)(3)  ...

info_outline
Ask Us Anything - Electionpalooza Edition show art Ask Us Anything - Electionpalooza Edition

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

Election season is well underway and politics is everywhere. It's one of  our busiest time at Bolder Advocacy. On this episode, we bring you three of your questions to answer on the pod... it’s another round of Ask Us Anything, Electionpalooza Edition!   Lawyers for this episode Tim Mooney Susan Finkle Sourlis Monika Graham   Shownotes - Question: Presidential campaigns working with outside groups on door-to-door canvassing for their get-out-the-vote efforts— is this illegal coordination under federal election law? - Answer:    - Base coordination rules...

info_outline
Voter Assistance State Resources show art Voter Assistance State Resources

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

With only a small handful of weeks remaining until the general election, you may be wondering about how you or your nonprofit can get involved in voter assistance activities such as providing rides to the polls, registering voters, and helping voters vote by mail. Would you be surprised that these activities are often regulated by both state and federal law? On this episode, we’ll discuss our Practical Guidance Voter Assistance resources series, created in partnership with Democracy Capacity Project, and explain some of the rules you should be thinking about in the final countdown to the big...

info_outline
Election Protection and Nonpartisan Voter Assistance show art Election Protection and Nonpartisan Voter Assistance

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

 This is a special rebroadcast of our episode on election protection and nonpartisan voter assistance from 2022. Since the original airing, Bolder Advocacy, in partnership with The Democracy Capacity Project, has expanded our series of state law guides on nonprofit voter assistance. Most states are covered and you can find them on our resource library page. We'll be back in two weeks with a brand new episode. --- On this episode, we’ll discuss how different types of tax-exempt organizations can ensure the right to vote is protected by engaging in election protection activities and...

info_outline
AI and Election Disinformation show art AI and Election Disinformation

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

As AI continues to advance, its potential to influence elections and democracy, both positively and negatively, has become a critical issue. In this episode, we delve into the rapidly evolving intersection of artificial intelligence and election disinformation with Jonathan Mehta Stein where he discusses how AI, particularly generative AI, can be used to create deepfakes and other misleading content that could destabilize elections, deceive voters, and potentially alter election outcomes. We also explore how nonprofits and community organizations can play a crucial role in combating this...

info_outline
Litigation show art Litigation

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

As we’ve talked about on previous editions of the pod, advocacy includes a wide array of different options to help change things for the better in our communities. One of the more important, but less discussed methods, is litigation. On this episode, we dive into the role litigation plays in nonprofit advocacy, its treatment under the law, and things to think about if your nonprofit is looking to use this tool for good.   Lawyers for this episode Natalie Ossenfort Tim Mooney Quyen Tu   Litigation as an advocacy tool (citizen suits, appeals, amicus briefs etc.) Treatment under tax...

info_outline
Student Advocacy show art Student Advocacy

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

In this episode of the podcast, we explore the importance of student advocacy and voting. Additionally, we discuss how 501(c)(3) organizations can engage in advocacy efforts during election season. Joining us today is Ally, our Bolder Advocacy legal intern, to answer questions about the impact of student advocacy on campus.    Hosts: Susan Finkle Sourlis (Attorney) Monika Graham (Attorney) Alexandra Roseberry (Intern) On-Campus Advocacy Culture On-Campus Activities  Voter Laws and Students Getting Involved With Advocacy as a Student How Nonprofits Can Participate in...

info_outline
Ask Us Anything show art Ask Us Anything

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

We are back again with another edition of Ask Us Anything where we select some of the most popular questions we've received lately to answer on the pod. We are also thrilled to introduce Bolder Advocacy's two newest attorneys Brittany Hacker and Melissa Marichal Zayasas they join us on the pod.   1. Effective Ways for 501(c)(3) Private Foundations to Advocate During Election Season: • Voter education • Issue advocacy • Conducting research and publishing reports • Making grants to public charities 2. Can Nonprofits Endorse Candidates Up for Election? • Differences in rules for...

info_outline
Politically Motivated Attacks show art Politically Motivated Attacks

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

Political attacks on nonprofit organizations can come in many forms, including legal challenges or public smear campaigns. Given the current political climate, organizations that engage in policy reform and election season advocacy are coming under increased scrutiny. As a result, it is crucial to be proactive and develop a comprehensive strategy to safeguard your organization’s reputation and operations. On this episode, we will discuss how your organization can ready itself in advance of potential politically motivated attacks.    Lawyers for this Episode  Monika...

info_outline
Election Detective show art Election Detective

Rules of the Game: The Bolder Advocacy Podcast

On this episode, we dive into the fundamentals of campaign finance reporting, exploring the essentials of what is included in these reports and uncovering valuable insights they provide. From contributions and expenditures to reporting requirements and deadlines, we break down the intricacies of campaign finance reports to empower you with the knowledge needed to navigate and comprehend campaign finance reports.   Attorneys Monika Graham Susan Finkle-Sourlis Victor Rivera Labiosa   Shownotes - Types of Campaign Finance Reports   - Federal perspective from the FEC (Federal...

info_outline
 
More Episodes

Lobbying Series Part 4 – Lobbying Exceptions 

On this episode, our fourth in our on-going lobbying series, we’ll focus on lobbying exceptions for all 501(c)(3)s, even private foundations.   

Attorney Co-hosts 

Leslie Barnes 
Tim Mooney 
Shyaam Subramanian 

 The Basics  

  • Reminder to check out the last two episodes on direct and grassroots lobbying for the definitions under 501(h). 
  • We’ve spent a lot of time talking about the importance of lobbying as a matter of good policy. You know who else agrees? Congress and the IRS! 
  • The law and regulations set up several lobbying exceptions – specific activity that is so important for policymaking that even though it would count as lobbying under the definitions, Congress and the IRS specifically exclude it from the tally. 
  • Even better – remember when we mentioned private foundations are heavily taxed if they engage in lobbying? These exceptions are available to them as well! 
  • Are you an organization that uses the insubstantial part test to measure lobbying? You may use some of these exceptions, but there are differences. Give us a call! 
     

The Exceptions 

Nonpartisan Analysis, Study, or Research (“The 50 Page Report Exception”) 

  • An exception to grassroots and direct lobbying 
  • Probably the most important exception – many charities do a ton of advocacy work, and may report no lobbying because they use this. 
  • Full and fair discussion 
  • Distributed widely 
  • May contain a view on legislation 
  • May also contain an indirect call to action (and only an indirect one!) 
  • Typically, this is a written report, but the regulations don’t mandate that. Could be a podcast or a YouTube video, so long as the two prongs are met. 
  • The synergy effect: non-lobbying report aids parallel lobbying efforts. 
  • Watch out for subsequent use! 
  • Don’t use this exception, then slap a cover letter on the report and include a direct call to action. This negates the whole exception for the report and then it all counts as grassroots lobbying. 
  • That’s a rebuttable presumption, so there are some ways to back out of it, but it’s very narrow.  

Examinations of Broad Social, Economic, or Similar Problems (“The Less Helpful Than It Seems Exception”) 

  • You discuss broad social, economic, or similar problems but do not express a view on specific legislation. 
  • Example: You about the problems uninsured people have accessing healthcare, without discussing legislation to fund a national healthcare program that provides health insurance for all Americans. Could think of it as, “we’re talking about the problems, not the solutions.” 
  • You might think – wait, if we’re not talking about legislation, how is this an exception? And we agree. But I think it is useful in the sense that you know you can comfortably talk about problems if you don’t talk about specific legislative solutions. You could even talk about administrative solutions! For example, President Biden should block the Keystone XL pipeline through an Executive Order. Not legislative! Or “Corporations should prioritize climate and energy efficiency goals, not just profit.” Not even about policy but could be impactful. 

Technical Advice or Assistance (“The Permission Slip”) 

  • Providing testimony to legislative committees will often count as lobbying. But Congress wanted to ensure they had access to experts on subject matter relating to legislation. So, they included the Technical Advice or Technical Assistance exception as one of the activities that will not as lobbying for public charities or private foundations.  
     
    So when you hear us say Nonprofits are trusted messengers” this is part of what we mean. Congress wants to hear from you!! 
     
    The elements or requirements of this exception are:
  • Written request from a governmental body (e.g., legislative committee or subcommittee); 
  • Response is available to every member of the body; 
  • Response is limited to details of request; and 
  • Response can include opinions or recommendations if requested. 

What it’s not: 

  • Responding to a request from one or two legislators or a caucus of House Democratic lawmakers for input on a bill draft. 
  • Responding to a general public notice for an upcoming city council meeting for which members of the public are invited to testify.  

One example of how it could be used: 

The Chair of the House Health and Public Policy Committee sends an email to your organization asking the Executive Director to testify next week on the specific portions of a bill dealing with parental notification of minors prior to medical procedures.  Your staff could spend time compiling data needed for the ED’s testimony as well as preparing a large visual display and preparing a section by section analysis of the parts of the bills the Chair’s inquiry pertained to and copies for each committee member. The staff and ED’s times spent preparing to testify as well as the time and resources spent to testify would NOT count as a lobbying expenditure. 
 
Self-Defense (“The Not as Available as it May Seem at First Exception”) 

  • An exception to direct lobbying 
  • communications with legislators regarding possible actions of that body which could affect the organization’s existence, powers, duties, tax-exempt status, or the deductibility of contributions to the organization. 
  • So long as the subject matter of the communication is limited to these specific areas, an organization may communicate with legislative bodies, their staff or even their individual members, and may also make expenditures to initiate legislation dealing with these specific topics. 
  • What it’s not: hey, we’re a neighborhood group opposing development of the farm next door into a cement plant because it will effectively destroy our neighborhood. Important advocacy, but not impacting the existence or powers of the organization. 
  • What it’s not part 2: A bill pending in Congress would raise the bulk mailing postage rates for nonprofits. Important to lobby perhaps, but just impacts your costs not your power. 
  • What it could be: any attempts by Congress to limit (for example) civil rights organizations or environmental groups from qualifying as charities. Or limiting tax deductibility of donations to groups that lobby (sidebar: you can’t earmark donations for lobbying and get a deduction). 
  • This exception can be used prospectively as well as defensively. So a bill to temporarily increase deductibility of donations through the end of COVID would qualify. 

Jointly Funded Project Exception 

  • If private foundations communicate with legislators about legislation impacting programs they jointly fund with government, it’s not lobbying under IRS rules. To use this exception, private foundations must not discuss specific legislative issues unrelated to the jointly funded program. 
  • Example: Regional Census Fund The Seattle Foundation contributed money to this effort and administered the fund. The City of Seattle and King County each invested resources in the effort. The fund supported community-based organizations to conduct Census outreach in hard-to-count communities. They reached out to residents in historically underrepresented communities, including communities of color, immigrants and refugees, native people, LGBTQ residents and others. Note: Seattle Foundation is a public charity.  
  • This exception also applies to PROSPECTIVE jointly funded projects! So, if the private foundation is considering jointly funding a project with the govt. they could engage in conversations w lawmakers under this exceptions. 
  • Also, if a private foundation makes a grant to an organization on the condition that the organization receive matching support from a governmental body, that fact does not make the grant a lobbying expenditure. 

 

How are these reported?  

They aren’t - track these as you would any other non-lobbying activity. 

Junk drawer of final thoughts 

Reminder: private foundations can use these exceptions. 

These aren’t lobbying, so often you can use restricted funds on these.  

Prep work for these activities also does not count as lobbying. 

We’re not sure if the advocacy we want to do is in an exception or not. Get in touch!  

Resources: