The Dirty Verdict

Get all the dirty details and legal insights from Houston Lawyers, Kyle Herbert and Peter Taffe, as they explore exciting cases. Kyle Herbert: https://herberttrial.com Peter Taaffe: https://comeauxmediation.com/attorney/peter-taaffe/ Bill Ogden: https://fbtrial.com/attorneys/bill-ogden/

S4 Eps 13: Judge Christine Weems Interverview 05/15/2026

S4 Eps 13: Judge Christine Weems Interverview In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert sit down with Judge Christine Weems of the 281st District Court in Harris County, Texas for a wide-ranging conversation about law, trial work, mock trial, theater, and the unexpected path that shaped her career. Judge Weems shares how she went from an English major at the University of Texas to South Texas College of Law, where mock trial helped her overcome a fear of public speaking and discover her love for advocacy. She talks about early trial experience, mass tort litigation, moving between Houston, Dallas, and New York, working document review while pursuing theater, and eventually returning to Texas to build a litigation career that led to the bench. The conversation also covers what motivated her to run for judge, the importance of trial experience on the bench, and her continued work in the arts through Cone Man Running Productions, including lawyer-cast theater productions that even offer CLE credit. Episode Highlights Judge Weems’ unconventional path from English major to trial lawyer to district court judge How mock trial helped her overcome fear of public speaking and discover courtroom advocacy Early lessons from working as a law clerk and being handed real litigation responsibility The impact of tort reform on asbestos and silica litigation work in Texas Her time in New York pursuing acting, theater, and entertainment work while still practicing law Returning to Texas for Hurricane Ike litigation and rebuilding a trial-focused career Why trial experience matters for judges and how courtroom experience shaped her decision to run The story behind Cone Man Running Productions and its lawyer-led theater productions How legal professionals can participate in or attend theater productions while earning CLE credit Chapters / Major Topics 00:00 — Introduction to Judge Christine Weems 01:43 — College background, UT, English major, Spanish minor, and unusual classes 05:26 — Discovering mock trial and meeting Brett Dressler 07:02 — Growing up in Spring and the early pull toward law 07:57 — How mock trial helped her overcome fear of public speaking 08:43 — South Texas College of Law and early work with Robert Clark 09:22 — Choosing litigation over transactional law 10:29 — First jury verdict and early trial experience 11:12 — Moving to Dallas after 9/11 and working in asbestos litigation 12:39 — Missing the courtroom and returning to plaintiff-side trial work 14:08 — Houston theater, acting, and finding a creative outlet outside law 15:12 — Going to New York for acting conservatory 16:06 — Tort reform, asbestos/silica litigation, and a shifting job market 18:51 — Document review, theater work, and extra roles on 30 Rock and Law & Order 21:57 — Meeting her husband, family life, and deciding where to practice law 22:36 — Returning to Texas for Hurricane Ike litigation 23:30 — Personal injury work, board certification, and trying cases 24:12 — Judicial discretion, courtroom experience, and what sparked the idea of running 26:17 — Why she decided to run for judge 26:48 — The 2018 judicial race and life on the bench 29:51 — Founding Cone Man Running Productions 31:07 — Lawyer-cast theater productions and CLE credit 36:18 — Promoting And Then There Were None at Spring Street Studios /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/41312620

S4 Eps 12: Alice Lima Lovchik Interview 05/11/2026

S4 Eps 12: Alice Lima Lovchik Interview In this episode of The Dirty Verdict Podcast, Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert sit down with trial lawyer Alice Lima Lovchik for a wide-ranging conversation about law, trial work, immigration, civility, and heavy metal. Alice shares her story of moving from Brazil to Houston, rebuilding her legal career from the ground up, learning English, working her way from file clerk to paralegal, and eventually passing both the New York and Texas bar exams. She also talks about her work in personal injury, immigration law, and why she feels called to serve Houston’s immigrant community through her trial practice. The conversation also gets into Alice’s life outside the courtroom as a metal vocalist, her love for grindcore and thrash metal, and how her intense stage presence contrasts with the calm, measured way she handled a highly controversial trial incident involving opposing counsel. The hosts and Alice also discuss courtroom civility, trial nerves, lessons from losses, mentorship, and the kind of wisdom trial lawyers would give their younger selves. Major Topics Discussed: 00:00 — Opening, host introductions, and Peter’s son being drafted by the Miami Dolphins 02:19 — Introducing Alice Lima Lovchik and her reputation as both a trial lawyer and metal vocalist 03:01 — Thrash metal, death metal, grindcore, and Alice’s former band Evocation 05:09 — Alice’s background in Brazil, moving to Houston, and meeting her husband at a rock show 07:49 — Starting over in the U.S., learning English, and entering the legal field as a file clerk 09:42 — Earning her LLM, passing the New York bar, and later passing the Texas bar 11:59 — Alice’s early legal career, working with Darrell Barger, and deciding insurance defense was not for her 14:03 — Working with Javier Marcos, moving into immigration law, and later returning to personal injury 16:20 — Marcos & Associates, trying cases frequently, and serving Houston’s Hispanic and immigrant communities 18:43 — How Alice evaluates cases, prepares for trial, and manages a large litigation docket 21:06 — Trying 25 cases in 12 months and the rush of being in trial 23:12 — Judges, livestreamed courtrooms, and how public clips can shape perceptions 28:46 — The controversial trial incident involving opposing counsel taking a photo of Alice’s notes 32:38 — How Alice handled the incident, why she chose restraint, and what civility looks like under pressure 38:18 — Maintaining professionalism with opposing counsel after serious conflict 43:13 — Houston’s metal scene, White Swan, and Alice’s next musical chapter 45:32 — Alice’s book project collecting stories and lessons from trial lawyers 48:45 — The hosts and Alice answer questions about their best moments as trial lawyers 54:42 — Trial losses, humility, and advice for younger lawyers /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/41247045

S4 Eps 11: Dan Horowitz Interview 05/01/2026

S4 Eps 11: Dan Horowitz Interview In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden sit down with trial lawyer and settlement planner Dan Horowitz for a conversation that starts with classic Dirty Verdict chaos and eventually lands on some genuinely valuable guidance for lawyers handling serious personal injury cases. Dan walks through his path from Bay City, Texas, to the University of Texas, South Texas College of Law, Abraham Watkins, and eventually opening his own firm. Along the way, the group covers law school networking, the realities of partnership points, going out on your own, and why relationships matter just as much as legal skill. The second half of the episode shifts into Dan’s current work in settlement planning, structured settlements, trusts, tax-free growth, fee deferrals, and how lawyers can better protect clients after a major recovery. Dan explains why settlement planning should not be treated as an afterthought, especially in cases involving minors, catastrophic injuries, long-term care needs, or clients receiving life-changing sums of money. 00:00 – Introduction / Meet Dan Horowitz 01:20 – Growing Up in Bay City, Texas 02:20 – Getting Expelled Senior Year 05:30 – Getting Into UT and Coasting Through the End of High School 07:00 – Driving Buses at UT / Early Work Stories 13:20 – Studying Business at UT 15:10 – Law School Path 16:20 – Biggest Law School Regret: Not Networking More 22:10 – Dan’s Professional Background and Recognition 23:20 – Early Legal Career and Firm Progression 25:45 – Becoming an Equity Partner 28:45 – Leaving to Start His Own Firm 31:25 – Transitioning Into Settlement Planning 33:00 – Getting His Insurance License 35:30 – Getting His Securities License 37:15 – Structured Settlements Explained 38:40 – Downsides of Structured Settlements 40:30 – Inflation Risk and Long-Term Planning 42:00 – Planning for Minors and Catastrophic Injury Cases 46:00 – When Lawyers Should Bring in a Settlement Planner 48:30 – Deferring Attorney Fees 51:00 – Structures as Protection From Bad Decisions or Pressure 52:40 – Customizing the Plan for Each Client /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/41116905

2026 Day of Civility 05/01/2026

S4 Eps 10: Robert Swafford on Voir Dire 04/17/2026

S4 Eps 9: John Zavitsanos and Monica Uddin of AZA 04/10/2026

S4 Eps 9: John Zavitsanos and Monica Uddin of AZA On this episode of The Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe and Bill Ogden sit down with powerhouse trial lawyers John Zavitsanos and Monica Uddin of AZA to talk about what makes Houston such a legendary trial-lawyer city, how elite trial teams are built, and why the best courtroom lawyers know how to find the human story in any case. The conversation covers everything from headline-making defamation matters and health care litigation to the future of Texas business courts and what young lawyers actually need to succeed in trial work. John shares his path from an immigrant upbringing to becoming one of Houston’s most respected trial lawyers, along with his perspective on how Houston became a true legal proving ground for courtroom talent. Monica brings insight from the next generation of elite trial lawyers, including her work on high-profile matters and her candid thoughts on legal recruiting, mentorship, and why real trial experience still matters. The episode also dives into some of the biggest issues shaping modern litigation: the devastating speed of social-media-fueled defamation, the economics behind health care and insurance disputes, and whether Texas business courts are becoming a serious alternative for complex commercial cases. It is a smart, funny, wide-ranging conversation packed with war stories, strong opinions, and a behind-the-scenes look at how great trial lawyers think. Top highlights from the episode: 00:03:06 – John Zavitsanos on his background and why Houston became his destination John talks about growing up in an immigrant family, discovering trial law, and why Houston stood out as the place to learn from the best. 00:18:39 – Monica Uddin discusses the Mary Kate Cornett matter Monica breaks down how a viral online rumor spiraled across social media, the real-world toll it took, and the legal and reputational issues that followed. 00:29:02 – John on trying cases against major insurance interests A sharp discussion on health care litigation, emergency room reimbursement fights, and why some of those cases became especially personal and meaningful. 00:39:19 – Monica on the Drake/UMG dispute Monica explains AZA’s Texas-side involvement in litigation tied to the Drake and Kendrick Lamar controversy. 00:44:21 – Texas business courts and what they could become John and Monica weigh in on how the new business courts are functioning, where they are succeeding, and what questions are still being worked out. 00:52:10 – What AZA looks for in young trial lawyers The conversation closes with a great discussion on training, courtroom reps, firm culture, and why they push young lawyers into real trial work early. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/40808005

S4 Eps 8: Dan Cogdell and Epic City 04/06/2026

S4 Eps 8: Dan Cogdell and Epic City In this wild and wide-ranging episode of Dirty Verdict, the hosts sit down with legendary criminal defense attorney Dan Cogdell for an unfiltered conversation that moves from legal commentary to cultural criticism and back again. Dan talks about the unexpected rise of his own podcast and social media presence, then dives into his sharp perspective on the steep decline in white collar prosecutions, shifting federal priorities, and what that means for defense work today. The conversation also explores Dan’s representation of the EPIC Muslim community development in Plano, including the political backlash, lawsuits, and broader questions about religious liberty, fear-based politics, and how certain communities get turned into convenient political targets. Along the way, the episode detours into Enron, jury strategy, high-stakes litigation, the Harris County DA’s office, and the changing business of law—making this one of the most candid, chaotic, and thought-provoking episodes yet. Major Topics Dan Cogdell’s new podcast, social media growth, and why short-form content has taken off for him The dramatic slowdown in federal white collar prosecutions and shifting enforcement priorities Fraud investigations, immigration enforcement, and changes inside the U.S. Attorney’s Office and FBI resources Dan’s representation of the EPIC Muslim community in Plano and the political controversy surrounding it Islamophobia, media narratives, and the use of fear in modern politics Enron, Jeff Skilling, Andy Fastow, and Dan’s firsthand stories from major white collar cases Harris County criminal justice, the DA’s office, and Sean Teare’s leadership compared to the prior administration Jury consulting, mock trials, AI-driven trial tools, and how litigation strategy is evolving Big verdicts, wrongful death litigation, and the differences between criminal and civil trial work The business of law, influence, branding, and how lawyers are adapting to media and public attention /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/40746995

S4 Eps 7: Matt Greenberg and Mike Streich 03/23/2026

S4 Eps 7: Matt Greenberg and Mike Streich In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe and Kyle Herbert sit down with returning guests Matt Greenberg and Mike Streich to talk about launching their new firm and what it really looks like to build a modern plaintiff’s practice from the ground up. From leaving a successful firm and betting on themselves, to handling overhead, referrals, office space, and admin headaches, Matt and Mike Streich share the honest realities of starting fresh in today’s legal market. The conversation also dives into how lawyers are using LinkedIn as a real business development and networking tool, why it matters more than ever for younger lawyers, and how online engagement can actually lead to cases and meaningful professional relationships. Beyond firm ownership, the episode gets into bigger-picture issues in litigation, including deposition conduct, objection gamesmanship, confidentiality clauses in settlements, and why more transparency could help level the playing field for plaintiffs’ lawyers. It’s a smart, funny, and practical conversation about law practice, entrepreneurship, and the changing business of being a trial lawyer. Important Highlights Matt Greenberg and Mike Streich launch their new firm The guys discuss leaving their former firm, opening their own practice in late 2025, and what pushed them to make the leap. What it’s really like to start a law firm in 2026 They break down the practical side of launching a firm today, including office space, software, legal research tools, admin work, and managing overhead. Why betting on yourself matters Matt and Mike talk about timing, building a bridge before making the jump, and why the fear of regret can be greater than the fear of failure. How LinkedIn is changing legal networking and referrals The episode explores how LinkedIn has become a real platform for lawyers to build relationships, share ideas, attract referrals, and even generate cases. Thought leadership and improving law practice culture They discuss using public conversations to challenge common frustrations in litigation and push for better practices across the profession. Deposition pet peeves and objection abuse Mike and Matt get into sloppy “non-responsive” objections, witness coaching, waiver issues, and the kinds of deposition tactics that frustrate trial lawyers. Confidentiality clauses in settlements The group talks about why confidentiality provisions often benefit defendants, when they should actually be negotiated, and why plaintiffs’ lawyers should push back. Plaintiff resources and the Texas venue map Matt and Mike explain a resource they built for plaintiff lawyers to compare Texas venues and make more informed filing decisions. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/40582315

S4 Eps 6: Judge Mike Engelhart Interview 03/09/2026

S4 Eps 6: Judge Mike Engelhart Interview In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden sit down with former Judge Mike Engelhart for a lively conversation that mixes courtroom insight, legal war stories, and a look at life on and off the bench. Judge Engelhart shares how he approached judging with patience, preparation, and practicality, while also reflecting on some of the memorable moments that defined his time in Harris County. The conversation touches on his path from New Jersey to Michigan to Houston, his legal beginnings working for John O’Quinn, and the decision to leave private practice for the bench. Judge Engelhart also opens up about losing his judicial primary, returning to private practice at Kherkher Garcia, and why he does not see another run for office in his future. Along the way, the episode delivers one of the most entertaining stories of the show: the famous case of Wilbur the Vietnamese pot-bellied pig, a homeowner’s association dispute that turned into a viral courtroom moment. Add in practical advice for trial lawyers, thoughts on litigation funding, and reflections on how lawyers should carry themselves in court, and this episode delivers both substance and personality. Timestamps & Highlights 00:00 – Judge Mike Engelhart joins the show The hosts welcome former Judge Mike Engelhart and kick things off with humor and stories from lawyers who appeared in his courtroom. 00:01:42 – Favorite Judge Engelhart courtroom moments Peter, Kyle, and Bill share memorable examples of Judge Engelhart’s patience, wit, and style from the bench. 00:04:06 – The Wilbur the pig story Judge Engelhart tells the now-legendary story of ruling that Wilbur, a Vietnamese pot-bellied pig, qualified as a pet and could stay in a neighborhood despite HOA objections. 00:11:07 – His background: Jersey, Michigan, and Houston Judge Engelhart talks about growing up in New Jersey, attending the University of Michigan, and eventually making Houston his long-term home. 00:15:27 – Spanish studies and studying abroad in Seville He shares how Spanish became a major part of his academic journey and led to a semester abroad in Spain. 00:19:48 – Why he chose the University of Houston Law Center Judge Engelhart explains why Houston was the right place to build a legal career and personal life. 00:20:38 – Family, marriage, and life in Houston He reflects on meeting his wife in law school, raising a family, and building a life in the city. 00:25:35 – Litigation funding and legal industry trends The group dives into a substantive discussion about disclosure of litigation funding and broader changes in the business of law. 00:29:04 – Early legal career and working for John O’Quinn Judge Engelhart discusses his first years in practice, learning procedure and evidence, and doing legal research the old-school way. 00:34:26 – Why he ran for judge He explains what drew him to the bench and how he navigated Harris County’s political and legal landscape. 00:40:10 – Best and worst things lawyers can do in trial Judge Engelhart offers practical advice for lawyers on preparation, credibility, courtroom demeanor, and what turns judges off. 00:47:58 – Do judges really read the briefing? He gives a candid answer about how he prepared for hearings and what made written advocacy more effective. 00:48:40 – Leaving the bench and joining Kherkher Garcia Judge Engelhart talks about losing his 2024 primary, transitioning back into private practice, and what he enjoys about his current role. 00:50:07 – Will he ever run for office again? He shares why he believes that chapter is closed and what comes next professionally. 00:51:34 – The cases he’s handling now From catastrophic injury matters to national litigation, Judge Engelhart describes the serious cases he is working on today. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/40374040

S4 Eps 5: Cordt Akers Interview 02/26/2026

S4 Eps 5: Cordt Akers Interview Hosts Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden sit down with Houston trial lawyer Cordt Akers, who lives at the intersection of criminal defense, white collar, and a bit of PI—all while carrying one of the more unusual origin stories you’ll hear on the show. Cordt walks through growing up in Houston, heading to Tulane (where Hurricane Katrina hit on his first day), and spending his early years as a working musician—until a brutal moment of “natural talent vs. hard work” forced a career pivot. That pivot led to South Texas College of Law, mock trial, and a fast, intense run through the Harris County DA’s Office, where a terrifying in-flight emergency and an unexpected moment of humanity reshaped how he viewed prosecution—and ultimately why he left. From there, Cordt breaks down his path into the Dan Cogdell orbit, building a reputation in federal white collar, and what it’s like to carry the emotional weight of trial work—especially when the outcome is literally life-changing. He also shares two major acquittals from the year, including a high-emotion murder trial in San Jacinto County and a public corruption case that went sideways for the prosecution in the best way possible. Funny, serious, and very “Dirty Verdict”—this one moves from My Little Pony headgear to murder trials to the reality of justice, ego, and what makes a great trial lawyer. Episode Highlights (with timestamps) 00:00:41 – 00:01:36 — Christmas edition energy, jokes flying, and Bill’s back in the studio 00:01:36 – 00:03:14 — Meet Cordt Akers: criminal defense + some PI, and the “multiple practice areas” intro 00:03:14 – 00:06:16 — The legend of Brock Akers (Cordt’s dad): verdict history, reputation, and the TLA membership banter 00:06:16 – 00:11:08 — Houston → Saint Michael’s/Jesuit → Tulane… and the jazz musician era (plus Katrina on day one) 00:11:08 – 00:12:46 — South Texas Law: dreams of entertainment law die in Contracts I 00:12:46 – 00:15:29 — Mock trial war stories: Golden Gate tandem bike terror + “they changed the rules after us” 00:15:29 – 00:18:02 — The mock trial culture: training under pressure (and sometimes with a hangover) 00:18:02 – 00:20:06 — DA’s Office stint (about 20 months) + the brutal elevator moment with Rusty Hardin 00:20:06 – 00:22:23 — Working for Dan Cogdell: mentorship, white collar exposure, and leveling up fast 00:22:23 – 00:27:14 — The turning point: in-flight engine fire, a stranger’s prayer, and Cordt’s realization about prosecutorial impact 00:27:14 – 00:29:22 — “How do you teach young prosecutors emotional intelligence?” + the ego vs. justice conflict 00:29:22 – 00:33:51 — Leaving Dan’s shop: taking the “take over the muffler repair center” option and building his own lane 00:36:01 – 00:37:08 — Two major acquittals this year: murder case + public corruption case 00:37:08 – 00:41:53 — San Jacinto County murder trial breakdown: alleged facts, accident defense, and the emotional verdict moment 00:42:10 – 00:44:12 — The “weird” public corruption case: daring the State to call the defendant first… and it backfiring on them 00:44:12 – 00:45:24 — Why he usually doesn’t talk to juries afterward (and a wild “we thought you were fake” jury comment) 00:47:44 – 00:50:34 — Where the DA’s office and federal prosecution are headed + why white collar cases feel like they’re dwindling 00:52:16 – 00:55:30 — Wrap-up: possible Father’s Day episode with Brock, where to find Cordt (acresfirm.com), and final laughs /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/40238175

S4 Eps 4: Andrew Cobos Interview 02/17/2026

S4 Eps 4: Andrew Cobos Interview The crew kicks off the holiday episode in peak Dirty Verdict fashion: festive sweaters, friendly roasting, and a proposed “punishment” that somehow turns into high-stakes Trivial Pursuit. Then repeat guest Andrew Cobos jumps in and the conversation shifts from jokes to jaw-dropping: Ironman distances, brutal open-water swims, and why Andrew’s next “goal” is somehow even crazier—climbing Mount Everest. From there, the episode turns serious as Andrew breaks down his firm’s work in major mass tort litigation, including PFAS “forever chemical” exposure, firefighting foam, and what those cases mean for veterans and industrial firefighters. The hosts also dig into the realities of taking on the government, how these claims are being built, and the bigger idea behind it all: using litigation to force real-world accountability and policy change—then somehow landing the plane back in Dirty Verdict land with talk of lawyer boxing matches and black-tie fight night. Timestamps & Highlights 00:00:15 – Holiday chaos begins — Peter, Kyle, and Bill trade greetings, jokes, and sweater-season banter. 00:00:40 – “Punishment” ideas — the crew floats leprechaun makeup and even retaking the SAT as consequences for missing the memo. 00:01:14 – High-stakes Trivial Pursuit — $100 per person, teams allowed… and trash talk immediately escalates. 00:02:11 – Andrew Cobos returns — repeat guest is back, and the guys immediately notice he’s in serious shape. 00:02:33 – Ironman résumé revealed — Andrew details completing two half Ironmans and a full (and clarifies the year). 00:02:53 – Ironman distances explained — swim/bike/run breakdown, plus the “it’s longer than it sounds” reality. 00:03:08 – Galveston + Cozumel swim stories — calm water vs brutal open-ocean conditions. 00:04:34 – Full Ironman in Florida — Andrew talks Panama City Beach and why “flat” can still feel brutal. 00:05:36 – Next goal: Everest — Andrew explains he’s transitioning from endurance racing to mountain climbing. 00:06:09 – Everest risk talk — crowding, danger, and the harsh reality of summit attempts. 00:06:47 – Andrew’s practice growth — the hosts talk about how well his firm is doing and why he keeps it lean. 00:09:05 – Lean firm philosophy — small team, low overhead, and staying intentional about growth. 00:09:45 – Mass tort focus — Andrew gets into the 3M earplug litigation and the scale of bellwether outcomes. 00:10:38 – PFAS explained (“forever chemicals”) — what it is, where it came from, and why it’s a major national litigation front. 00:11:15 – Firefighting foam + cancer discussion — exposure pathways, firefighters, and what makes these cases so serious. 00:12:16 – C8 vs C6 — the distinction, the “PR shift,” and why it still matters in litigation. 00:13:23 – Dose + duration challenge — why proving exposure over time becomes a battlefield in these cases. 00:15:03 – Legal-movie sidebar — the crew riffs on classic litigation films and how realistic negotiation scenes can be. 00:16:12 – 3M earplug case scale — why it’s one of the biggest MDLs and what makes it uniquely massive. 00:17:08 – Transition to Fort Hood/Cavazos topic — the conversation turns to a major new, troubling set of allegations. 00:18:07 – Andrew’s military background + context — West Point, Fort Hood experience, and systemic concerns. 00:20:15 – “Floodgates opened” moment — the scope expands quickly once the case becomes public. 00:22:22 – Power dynamics + policy failures — Andrew explains why structural safeguards matter in military medical settings. 00:24:22 – Moving beyond litigation — emphasis on policy reform and conversations with lawmakers. 00:26:48 – Volume of clients referenced — Andrew discusses the scale of representation and coordination. 00:31:52 – Intake + mental health support — the firm’s workflow and why trauma counseling is a priority. 00:34:38 – Broader military context — comparisons to other cases and how these situations escalate institutionally. 00:36:17 – Andrew’s MP deployments — route security, IED reality, and what that job actually looked like. 00:41:07 – Army–Navy tradition — library pushups, West Point culture, and Houston’s West Point club. 00:43:24 – Why Andrew keeps the firm small — travel, retreats, and culture as a deliberate strategy. 00:46:55 – Lawyer boxing idea returns — the crew starts fantasy-booking “Dirty Verdict Fight Night.” 00:48:10 – White-collar boxing memory — black-tie vibe, big money, and how it could work as an event. 00:50:32 – Wrap-up — thanks, shout-outs, and where to follow/listen. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/40138555

S4 Eps 3: Chi Nguyen Interview 02/06/2026

S4 Eps 3: Chi Nguyen Interview In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe and Kyle Herbert sit down with Houston branding powerhouse Chi Nguyen to unpack the real story behind one of the most recognizable legal marketing campaigns in the city: “We Push. You Win.” Chi shares his Houston roots, the wild origin story that pushed him toward law (yes—he got hit with a Nike cease & desist as a teenager), and how a marketing brain + personal injury law became the foundation for a firm built to scale. Then the conversation turns into a full-blown masterclass on billboards, repetition, commuter psychology, emotional decision-making, and building a brand that stays top-of-mind. They also dive into the less-glamorous side of growth—systems, operations, HR headaches, and maintaining quality while scaling fast—before Chi shares what’s next: launching The Nguyen Law Firm and building a legal tech / AI platform designed to help lawyers run leaner and serve clients better. YouTube-style highlights (with timestamps) 00:00:39 — Intro + Chi Nguyen joins the show 00:00:53 — Why Chi is one of the most recognizable legal brands in Houston 00:02:15 — Chi’s Houston upbringing + immigrant family background 00:03:13 — “I got sued by Nike for $1,000,000 in 9th grade.” 😳 00:05:44 — The “Gucci monogram Jordan” moment… and realizing they were fake 00:06:23 — How Chi found a China supplier + created a dropship operation 00:08:04 — Early Google PPC: “Air Jordan” clicks were $0.10 00:08:30 — Scaling from 20 orders/day to 100+ orders/day as a teenager 00:08:50 — Nike demand letter hits: fear, panic, and the moment that changed his life 00:10:09 — Using the money to help family (not flexing shoes) + why he chose law 00:12:40 — U of H marketing + sales program (why it matters) 00:14:04 — Why personal injury: watching Jim Adler commercials as a kid 00:15:13 — South Texas College of Law + meeting Anthony + starting the firm 00:19:04 — The “biggest in Houston” vision + hitting goals early 00:22:42 — Spotting a funeral home “For Sale” sign… and turning it into the office 00:23:18 — Target audience strategy: why he focused on specific Houston pockets 00:25:03 — Billboard strategy begins: planning in 2021, executing in early 2022 00:26:34 — Google PPC got wrecked: $500–$600 per click for PI terms 00:28:00 — Why billboards still work in Houston (if you do it right) 00:29:39 — “You don’t have to be everywhere—just be undeniable somewhere.” 00:30:27 — Repetition math: 250,000 cars/day + stacking boards for 100% capture 00:31:21 — People buy emotionally, then justify logically (jury + marketing crossover) 00:33:06 — “Your logo is your face.” Branding with faces > logos 00:35:37 — The psychological hack behind We Push / You Win 00:37:18 — Early boards were too busy → simplifying to face + website only 00:39:03 — Why they went all-in on branding instead of lead-gen 00:40:33 — Timeline expectations: committing to a full year with no panic pivot 00:41:52 — Starting budget: around $100K/month for the initial billboard run 00:43:31 — The iconic “viral” square board location off 45 & Telephone 00:43:58 — Scale: ~50 “permed” boards + building the inventory over time 00:46:27 — Scaling operations: bringing in a CEO to systematize and streamline 00:49:28 — The hardest part of growth: managing people + protecting culture 00:51:12 — What’s next: The Nguyen Law Firm + launching a legal tech company 00:53:32 — AI thesis: the biggest flex is building lean with small teams 00:56:17 — AI for law: case management, comms, virtual depos/mediations 00:57:22 — Claude vs ChatGPT + “make the AIs argue” strategy 00:59:24 — What lawyers should fear: surveillance, not productivity 01:00:27 — Wrap-up + where to find Chi + beta testing timeline 01:01:28 — Outro + socials /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/40015795

S4 Eps 2: Stephen Boutros Interview 01/20/2026

S4 Eps 1: Will Moye and Ryan Loya Share Major Verdicts 01/06/2026

S4 Eps 1: Will Moye and Ryan Loya Share Major Verdicts In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert welcome back fan-favorite trial lawyer Will (now with The Counsel Table podcast) alongside Ryan Loya, who’s fresh off launching his own firm. After some classic Dirty Verdict banter—college football pain, unexpected fan shoutouts, and law-firm “launch party” flexes—the conversation pivots into a deep dive on one of the most catastrophic industrial incidents Houston has seen in years: a propylene leak and explosion that devastated a neighborhood in January 2020. Will and Ryan break down how the litigation evolved into a massive Texas MDL, why the case became “the gamut” of tort claims (personal injury, property damage, business interruption, subrogation, and more), and how the trial team secured two monster verdicts—$37.8M in the first trial and $118M+ in the second. The group also digs into trial strategy: how MDL “trial tracks” get chosen, how the defense approached (and arguably misplayed) damages, the value of picking the right liability narrative, and why juries—especially younger jurors—are thinking differently about corporate accountability. If you want a real-world masterclass in explosion litigation, MDL mechanics, and trial tactics under pressure, this one’s loaded. Show Highlights (with timestamps) 00:00:00 – 00:01:00 — Intro 00:01:00 – 00:02:22 — Will’s return + the running joke about his podcast spinoff era (The Counsel Table / “coaching tree” banter). 00:03:03 – 00:04:28 — Ryan Loya joins, shares his background, and announces his new firm launch (including the Bentley showroom party). 00:04:28 – 00:05:33 — Law-firm websites, domain-name chaos, and the “starting a business is just buying URLs” reality. 00:06:15 – 00:07:52 — College football detour: hostile road environment stories and Texas/Georgia frustration. 00:07:52 – 00:09:43 — Fan shoutouts, the “who’s your favorite host?” debate, and the crew reacting in real time. 00:09:43 – 00:12:13 — The incident overview: propylene leak, ~10+ hours of gas accumulation, switch flip → explosion → neighborhood damage. 00:12:13 – 00:14:00 — Casualties and injuries discussed; why Houston’s lack of zoning can put heavy industry next to homes. 00:13:42 – 00:15:12 — MDL explained (for non-lawyers): centralized claims, same tort, different damages—how it differs from class actions. 00:15:12 – 00:17:03 — The case complexity explodes: nuisance, injury, property, insurer subrogation, business interruption; plus bankruptcy complications. 00:18:05 – 00:21:31 — Defendants and liability focus: gas detection systems, service obligations, corporate handoffs, and the “we didn’t own it anymore” defense. 00:20:47 – 00:21:31 — The first big number lands: $37.8M (Trial 1), and the second: $118M+ (Trial 2). 00:21:31 – 00:23:14 — How MDL “trial tracks” are picked: plaintiff picks vs defense picks and the strategy behind each. 00:23:14 – 00:24:57 — Settlements/non-suits reshaping the lineup right before trial; trial team composition and collaboration across firms. 00:26:03 – 00:28:00 — Trial strategy critique: defense under-anchoring damages, limited pushback, and why that can backfire. 00:28:18 – 00:29:31 — Key tactical move: narrowing targets (“ride one horse”) to simplify the liability story for the jury. 00:31:02 – 00:32:18 — Fault allocation talk + a rare joint enterprise finding discussion and what it means in practical terms. 00:33:07 – 00:34:36 — The “reptile” angle without gross negligence: internal safety language like “protect the community” becomes trial fuel. 00:38:06 – 00:39:48 — Appellate counsel mentions + jury selection decisions (including shuffling based on early panel composition). 00:42:44 – 00:44:14 — Trial 2 injuries: orthopedic workups/surgeries, chemical exposure claims, and the major plaintiff: a 9-year-old with scleroderma. 00:46:03 – 00:47:25 — Practice pointer: the danger of trial-depo video strategy and how cross-exam choices can haunt you. 00:46:31 – 00:48:30 — Deliberations lasted days; holdout dynamics; biggest award in Trial 2: $58M to the child plaintiff. 00:48:30 – 00:49:36 — A Gen Z juror’s accountability mindset: “I’m not signing unless the corporate defendant is 51%+.” 00:50:18 – 00:52:28 — Will reflects on how the show helped his firm; big shoutouts to the collaborative team that carried the case for years. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/39623660

S3 Eps 30: Sean Teare - Harris County DA 12/17/2025

Trial by Fire: Sammy Ford's Story 12/08/2025

Trial by Fire: Sammy Ford's Story On this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert sit down with Houston trial lawyer Sammy Ford of AZA Law Firm for a wide-ranging conversation about big cases, career pivots, and what it really takes to build a life in the courtroom. Sammy walks us through his journey from growing up in Houston’s Third Ward and dreaming of Wall Street, to Harvard, UT Law, a Fifth Circuit clerkship, and stints at powerhouse firms Sussman Godfrey and Abraham Watkins—before landing at AZA. Along the way, he shares war stories from Enron-era work, hedge fund blow-ups, MDLs, and trying complex commercial and injury cases in front of some of Texas’s most memorable judges. From buying his first Bitcoin at an ATM “as a joke” to taking on billion-dollar trading companies after Winter Storm Uri, Sammy breaks down how high-stakes litigation actually works, how big verdicts happen, and why relationships, bar work, and smart marketing still matter. The episode closes with practical, no-nonsense advice for young lawyers who want to carve out a serious trial career in a chaotic legal landscape. Segment Highlights (with timestamps) [00:00:38] Opening banter & Halloween costume chatter Peter welcomes listeners back, introduces Bill and Kyle, and the crew roasts Bill’s “athletic fit” shirt and his Halloween costume plans. [00:01:16] Introducing guest trial lawyer Sammy Ford (AZA Law Firm) The hosts welcome returning guest Sammy Ford of AZA, joke about going in “totally cold,” and tease hot-button topics from Garza to politics. [00:02:14] Politics, Garza, and why Peter refuses to go full pundit Light sparring over politics, “woke” jokes, and Peter’s insistence on mostly avoiding political rabbit holes in a polarized world. [00:02:34] Peter vs. Sammy’s résumé (and a call to Jennifer Pinkerton) Peter admits Sammy’s bio is so stacked he had to stop reading, call friend Jennifer Pinkerton for emotional support, and regroup before finishing it. [00:03:12] Growing up in Houston’s Third Ward & inner-city Catholic school Sammy shares his roots in Third Ward / Riverside Terrace, inner-city Catholic school, and the transition to St. Thomas High School. [00:03:38] “Absolutely not”: Why law was not the first plan In high school, Sammy wanted away from Texas—chasing finance or computer science in California or New York and aiming for Wall Street or Silicon Valley. [00:04:02] Choosing Harvard & the dot-com bust / Enron era pivot Sammy picks Harvard, then watches the dot-com bubble burst, markets slide, and Enron collapse back home—pressure that nudges him toward law. [00:05:20] Government major, hated econ, and the “study what you like” lesson He bails on economics, studies government, considers folklore & mythology, and explains why “it doesn’t matter what you major in” hits different at Harvard. [00:07:13] Early Houston litigation work during the Enron fallout Sammy returns to Houston summers to work at Nickens, Keaton, Lawless, Farrell & Flack, seeing Enron officers cycling through the office and Houston from a new, big-firm vantage point. [00:09:30] UT Law, the infamous Buda apartment & early big-firm life He heads to UT Law, gets tricked into living way out in Buda, and splits summers between Vinson & Elkins and Andrews Kurth, while big-firm tort defense starts to fade. [00:15:19] Fifth Circuit clerkship with Judge Jerry Smith Sammy talks about clerking for Judge Jerry Smith, why one year of clerking is usually plenty, and how some co-clerks parlay that path all the way to the Supreme Court. [00:17:27] Sussman Godfrey & the $500M hedge fund blow-up case At Sussman Godfrey, he dives into a major arbitration over a hedge fund blown up by aggressive margin calls during the financial crisis. [00:20:01] The first Bitcoin buy: $20 at a bar ATM Sammy tells the story of buying about $20 of Bitcoin from an early ATM at a Houston bar, forgetting about it, then finding the receipt years later when it was worth far more. [00:23:24] Moving to Abraham Watkins for real trial experience He joins Abraham Watkins, tries around 20 cases in five years, and works with Randy Sorrels, Benny Agosto, Mo Aziz, Brant Stogner, and others on serious PI and explosion cases. [00:29:03] First lead trial: Handwritten appearance at the holiday party At the firm holiday party, Judge Wyman conscripts Sammy into representing a pro se plaintiff the next morning—he handwrites his notice of appearance on yellow legal pad and jumps into his first lead trial. [00:37:00] Landing at AZA: A blend of Sussman and Abraham Watkins Sammy explains how AZA came onto his radar, why it feels like a mix of high-end commercial litigation and plaintiff-side trial work, and how teams rotate instead of being siloed. [00:41:07] Winter Storm Uri & the $123M “force majeure” showdown He breaks down representing an Oklahoma producer against Koch Energy over Winter Storm Uri: force majeure declarations, withheld payments, a $123M damages model, and a fast jury verdict in his client’s favor. [00:47:37] Port of Houston vs. Louis Dreyfus & Judge Lynn Hughes Sammy walks through a trial for the Port of Houston over a grain facility against Louis Dreyfus, complete with damaged infrastructure, a cooperative plant manager, and Judge Lynn Hughes cutting off his cross. [00:52:09] How AZA gets its cases & being the “trial-only” hire Discussion turns to institutional clients, one-off engagements, and being the firm that’s brought in when another shop needs a pure trial team to finish the job. [00:53:47] Lessons from clerkships, Sussman, Abraham Watkins & AZA Sammy lays out key career lessons: don’t politically box in your career, fight over what matters (a la Steve Sussman’s Trial by Agreement), get deeply involved in the bar, and market yourself so people actually know you’re good. [00:58:11] Closing, Greek Festival talk & where to find Sammy The hosts plug AZA’s website, joke about the firm’s art and Greek Festival tickets, and wrap with where to find Sammy and future Dirty Verdict episodes wherever you get your podcasts. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/39318860

S3 Eps 28: Imrana Manzanares from Nurse to PI Attorney 11/17/2025

S3 Eps 28: Imrana Manzanares from Nurse to PI Attorney Mediator Peter Taaffe and trial lawyer Kyle Herbert host a “diet” edition of The Dirty Verdict with a powerhouse guest: Imrana Manzanares, former ICU nurse turned trial lawyer at Abraham Watkins. Imrana walks through her journey from the Texas Medical Center to the courtroom, what it’s really like doing ICU nursing in Houston, how she pivoted into law school, and how her medical background gives her a serious edge in personal injury cases. She also opens up about raising kids while building a career, surviving floods and tornadoes at the firm’s iconic building, and why yoga and fitness are non-negotiables for lawyers’ mental health. Episode Highlights & Timestamps 00:00:40 – “Diet Dirty Verdict” intro Peter and Kyle kick off a slimmed-down episode, joke about hot yoga, matcha, and introduce guest trial lawyer and former nurse Imrana Manzanares. 01:27 – From ICU nurse to medicine snob Imrana talks about working as an ICU nurse at St. Luke’s and Methodist in the Texas Medical Center, handling pulmonary and surgical ICU patients, and seeing world-class care up close. 03:07 – Growing up in Houston & education path She shares about growing up in Alief, moving to Sugar Land, bouncing between Second Baptist and Hastings, then heading to UH, UTB for nursing, a psychology degree, and finally law school at Thurgood Marshall (TSU). 05:04 – The pivot from nursing to law Imrana explains how she knew bedside ICU nursing wasn’t a lifelong fit, looked at NP and MBA programs, then on a whim took the LSAT, earned a scholarship to TSU, and followed that door when it opened. 07:26 – Moving to LA, graduating early & joining Abraham Watkins She describes finishing law school in 2.5 years to join her husband in Los Angeles, coming back to Houston during the 2009 recession, and landing at Abraham Watkins after a Christmas party invite—and staying for 16 years. 09:12 – Building a career while raising young kids Imrana talks about starting at the firm with a toddler, getting pregnant with her son, and how the firm let her work 9–3 for years so her career could grow alongside her children. 10:22 – Teenagers, growth spurts & mom life She shares where her kids are now (15 and 17), the 4.5" summer growth spurt, and a moment when her son officially became taller than her. 11:29 – Husband the builder: arenas, rails, and high-rises Imrana explains her husband’s career building major projects like the Spurs’ arena, convention centers, the Houston light rail, and a downtown LA high-rise that once housed Soulja Boy. 13:16 – Leaving the bedside & how hard ICU really is She opens up about why she didn’t want to stay at the bedside forever, how emotionally and physically brutal ICU work can be, and why we should be grateful for doctors and nurses. 15:21 – Medical background as a superpower in PI Imrana and the hosts dive into how her nursing background helps her read records, understand medical jargon, and go toe-to-toe with medical experts in depositions. 16:35 – Translating doctor/nurse shorthand She explains how she can “read between the lines” in nurses’ notes and build a more accurate damages model from medical records. 19:10 – The brutal reality of med-mal in Texas Imrana breaks down why she mostly moved away from medical malpractice: tort reform, causation fights, non-economic caps that haven’t budged in 20+ years, and why most med-mal cases just don’t make economic sense anymore. 22:03 – Steering the kids: engineering & debate team She talks about guiding her daughter toward chemical engineering and her son toward law via debate, plus a hilarious “llama haircut vs. Sephora products” argument that shows how sharp he is. 24:26 – Work–life balance, networking & “lady who lunches” Imrana explains learning the importance of networking in law (vs. healthcare), juggling lunches, happy hours, mom life, and why her supportive husband and family make it possible. 27:18 – Flexible schedules & long-term loyalty She describes how being allowed to work part-time created a win-win: she stayed present for her kids and the firm gained a long-term, loyal trial lawyer. 28:21 – Post-Covid remote work & opportunity for women lawyers Imrana shares why she thinks Covid changed the game—Zoom, remote work, and how a little flexibility can unlock huge value from talented moms and caregivers. 30:02 – Floods, tornadoes & the legendary Abraham Watkins building The crew recaps multiple floods at the downtown building, converting the flooded first floor into a parking garage, then getting hit by a tornado, and plans for a new three-story expansion. 32:59 – Memorable Metro bus case Imrana talks about a tough case against Metro involving a pedestrian client and disputed liability, how many lawyers turned it down, and how she fought through video and liability issues to get a meaningful result. 42:15 – Premises tragedies: manhole death & gym shooting She walks through two heartbreaking cases: A woman found in an uncovered, brush-covered manhole behind her home A man randomly shot in the back of the head at a gym and how premises liability is often brutally hard when third-party crime is involved. 45:00 – Dump truck crash & finding extra coverage With only a $500k CSL policy and ten claimants, Imrana dug deeper, discovered the dump truck was overloaded, and brought in another responsible party with more coverage to get a better outcome. 48:08 – Gas explosion wrongful death case She describes a Dallas-area home gas explosion case where her client was severely burned and later died, litigating against the gas company, and working with experienced explosion lawyers to resolve it. 53:59 – Growth & diversity at Abraham Watkins Imrana reflects on the firm’s evolution—from an older, mostly male shop to ~30 lawyers, a fully diverse roster, and expansion that just keeps filling up. 55:25 – Covid productivity, Zoom practice & remote staff The team talks about how much work they got done during Covid, how Zoom changed depositions and hearings, and how remote work lets them keep talented staff who move or need flexibility. 57:32 – Yoga, Peloton & staying healthy as a lawyer Imrana shares how she transitioned from running to yoga in 2017, why yoga is her “end-of-day massage” for desk-job shoulders, uses Peloton and yoga apps, and the importance of movement as lawyers age. 58:56 – Yoga culture, crowded studios & Black Swan shout-out They trade stories about sweaty, mat-to-mat classes, shirt-on vs. shirt-off yoga guys, and Imrana shouts out Black Swan Yoga and her favorite studios. 1:07:18 – Final takeaways: second careers, flexible firms, and move your body Peter recaps the themes: law as a powerful second career, firms embracing flexible schedules, and the importance of exercise. Imrana closes with her “nurse attorney” perspective on why working out, not self-medicating, is critical for lawyers’ mental health. 1:08:52 – Outro & where to follow The Dirty Verdict team signs off and reminds listeners to follow and subscribe on Instagram, Spotify, LinkedIn, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, TikTok, Facebook, and more. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/39061715

S3 Eps 27:The Dirty Verdict — Halloween Edition 2025 🎃 10/31/2025

S3 Eps 27:The Dirty Verdict — Halloween Edition 2025 🎃 The Dirty Verdict — Halloween Edition 2025 🎃 Costumes, bourbon, and big-law war stories collide. Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden welcome fan-favorites Mark Thiessen and Mark Metzger for our annual Halloween bash. It’s part comedy hour, part shop talk: mediation mind games, Stowers tactics, billboard math, PI client-poaching, charging trends in Harris & Galveston County, immigration cross-currents, and why this show is—ironically—a very visual medium. Watch for the costumes; stay for the legal gems. Chapters 00:00 Cold open: “This is a visual medium—watch on YouTube” 00:38 Halloween roll-call + where’s Tally? 02:30 Mediation mindset: deadlines, snacks & “sweating out” the other side 03:48 Costumes: Pickle Bill, Michael Myers, Teen Wolf, Bandit, Dorothy 05:39 Road-trip Bandit: Texas to Florida & the Hyundai Tucson saga 06:52 The eternal bunny suit & (soft-core?) Donnie Darko jokes 10:00 Catching up: building a PI practice (marketing, pipeline, burn) 11:45 Client poaching, runners & why criminal court culture is different 13:39 Flat fees vs. hourly; trial dates, Stowers pressure, and the waiting game 15:25 “Letterhead rule,” airtight Stowers ideas & certified mail gambits 18:48 Billboard economics (9–15k/mo), reinvesting vs. Lambos 20:16 EOS / Fireproof by Mike Morse; visionary vs. integrator 22:10 Trying cases = better outcomes (criminal & PI parallels) 25:14 Galveston update: new DA appointment + local bar dynamics 28:15 Metzger’s bikini-contest emcee gig (marketing that isn’t boring) 33:12 Lone Star Rally crossover? Law Tigers chat 37:08 Harris County pulse: charging trends, DV reasonableness, intox manslaughter offers 41:30 Individualizing justice vs. one-size-fits-all sentencing 45:10 Immigration ripples: ICE fears, “witness cards,” plea choices 51:20 Lawyers + burnout: immigration bar morale & policy whiplash 54:40 Closing chaos, shout-outs, and where to find the guests 56:48 Follow/Subscribe + platforms Guests & Links • Mark Thiessen — TexasTrialAttorney • WeFightGiants.com • Mark Metzger — IslandAttorney.com • #IslandAttorney Watch/Listen YouTube • Spotify • Apple Podcasts • Amazon Music (search “The Dirty Verdict”) Follow The Dirty Verdict IG/TikTok/FB: @thedirtyverdict /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/38871495

S3 Eps 27:The Dirty Verdict — Halloween Edition 2025 🎃 10/31/2025

S3 Eps 26: Marty Lancton Enters the Race: A Firefighter’s Bid for Harris County Judge 10/19/2025

S3 Eps 26: Marty Lancton Enters the Race: A Firefighter’s Bid for Harris County Judge In this episode of Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert sit down with returning guest Marty Lancton, president of the Houston firefighters’ union and now an announced 2026 candidate for Harris County Judge. Marty opens up about why he’s running, what he’s learned from decades of front-line public service, and how his experience leading Houston’s firefighters has shaped his vision for Harris County’s future. The conversation covers everything from public safety, disaster response, and infrastructure to transparency, county budgets, and rebuilding public trust. With a firefighter’s candor and a mediator’s mindset, Marty explains why leadership starts with listening—and why local government should focus less on politics and more on solving real problems. Of course, this wouldn’t be Dirty Verdict without humor, sidebars about the Astrodome, Harris County Toll Road Authority, and Taylor Swift, and a few good-natured lawyer jabs along the way. Marty’s Big Announcement – Houston Firefighters Union President Marty Lancton officially announces his 2026 run for Harris County Judge. Why He’s Running – Marty shares what inspired his decision to enter the race, focusing on leadership, accountability, and rebuilding trust in county government. Inside Harris County Government – A clear explanation of how the county judge and commissioners court operate—and why that structure matters for taxpayers. Public Safety First – Marty outlines his top priorities: emergency response, disaster preparedness, flood mitigation, and infrastructure. Fixing the Budget Mess – A deep dive into deficits, hidden funds, and the lack of transparency in Harris County’s multibillion-dollar budget. Fighting Corruption and Waste – Marty discusses how small lapses in oversight can snowball into serious integrity problems—and how he plans to restore accountability. Crossing Party Lines – Why local leadership shouldn’t be partisan, and how collaboration leads to better results for residents. Lessons from the Firehouse – How decades of firefighting shaped Marty’s leadership style: stay calm, adapt quickly, and always put people first. Disaster Management Reality Check – How emergency agencies really coordinate in a crisis, and why trust and teamwork save lives. The Astrodome Debate – The hosts pitch tongue-in-cheek ideas for repurposing Houston’s landmark—from a Rainforest Café to a football showdown on concrete. Government Red Tape – How lawsuits, politics, and delay tactics keep Harris County from solving real problems efficiently. The Dirty Verdict Banter – Plenty of laughs as Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert keep things lively with jokes about waivers, Taylor Swift, smoking bans, and local politics. Closing Thoughts – Marty ends on a note of service, transparency, and trust: “If you can’t tell the truth, you can’t lead.” It’s an episode packed with insight, laughs, and a genuine look at one of the most consequential local races ahead. Website: https://Martyforharriscountyjudge.com /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/38629970

S3 Eps 25: Billboards, Boxing & (Very) Venomous Hobbies ft. Anthony Pusch 10/03/2025

S3 Eps 25: Billboards, Boxing & (Very) Venomous Hobbies ft. Anthony Pusch Houston PI attorney Anthony Pusch joins Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden for a wild, wide-open conversation about building a law brand that actually cuts through the noise—plus boxing gyms, tasers, and… cobras. Anthony traces the path from seven high schools and a hot-headed teen to launching Pusch & Nguyen, shares the hard lessons behind PPC, TV, radio, and those viral billboards (including the infamous Step Brothers and “Brokeback” creatives), and gets candid about ethics complaints, attribution, and why authentic social content beats canned “10 things after an accident” posts every time. We also detour into tort reform, San Antonio expansion, trial wins, and the surprising stress relief of… a tortoise sanctuary. Highlights Growing up in Houston, seven high schools and a near-fight with a drill instructor Parents, aunts, uncles all lawyers—swore he’d never practice, then found his lane Early years grinding cases, learning PPC vs. brand the hard way The origin of “Pusch & Nguyen,” why the name became the brand, and billboard repetition that works Step Brothers shoot, the “Brokeback” billboard, going viral, and handling Pushback without crossing the line Bar/ethics dust-ups over the word “win,” and how they navigated it Tracking ROI: billboard + radio/TV + referrals = top-of-mind math Why most lawyer content flops and what genuine, useful posts could look like (dash-cam breakdowns, real rehab tips) Boxing/Jiu-Jitsu at the office, the COVID gym era, and a (hilarious) taser story Snakes & tortoises: from gaboon vipers and cobras to a calmer sanctuary On tort reform and why capping liability makes roads less safe Trial talk: recent seven-figure verdicts, hiring hungry lawyers, and avoiding predatory financing Follow/Subscribe: YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram & TikTok (@DirtyVerdict). Guest: Anthony Pusch — Pusch & Nguyen. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/38460785

S3 EPS 24: Jeff Davis on Oilfield Trials, Mentors, and Moshing Gone Wrong 09/19/2025

S3 EPS 24: Jeff Davis on Oilfield Trials, Mentors, and Moshing Gone Wrong Defense trial lawyer Jeff Davis joins Peter, Kyle, and Bill for a fast-moving hour that hops from a wild “mosh pit” case at Cynthia Woods Mitchell Pavilion to the nuts and bolts of catastrophic oilfield litigation. Jeff shares early-career war stories with Peter, breaks down indemnity and Chapter 95 fights, and explains why stipulating to liability can defang a jury’s anger. You’ll hear candid takes on focus groups, witness prep disasters, New Mexico’s hedonic damages, and how juries “send a message” without blowing up numbers. We wrap on golf: Bandon trips, Pebble magic, Muirfield Village perfection, Big Cedar surprises—and a Houston muni tale you won’t forget. Highlights Throwback trial: The Pavilion “mosh pit” case, early use of responsible third party, and a conservative jury’s $20k punitive “message.” Oilfield 101: Catastrophic injury (≈80%) vs. commercial down-hole disputes; indemnity/knock-for-knock dynamics; Chapter 95 control issues. From rig to courtroom: Day-one callouts, OSHA interactions, Permian & New Mexico venues, and why site visits matter. Strategy that moves numbers: How stipulating liability and smart focus groups cool juror anger—and when plaintiffs’ detailed demand letters help resolution. Witness prep—good, bad, ugly: The peril of over-coaching, “I don’t know” discipline, and the depo pause heard ’round the mediation. Venue quirks: New Mexico wrongful-death hedonic damages and RTP practice to get all actors on the form. Verdicts & lessons: A seven-figure Oklahoma verdict, why “ask” matters, and the anti-reptile effect of accountability. Golf cooldown: Bandon plans, Pebble as #1 played, Muirfield Village conditions, Big Cedar/Payne’s Valley cabins, and the Lions/Hermann Park debate. 🎧 Follow and watch: Spotify • YouTube • Apple Podcasts • Amazon Music • TikTok • LinkedIn • Instagram • Facebook. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/38284850

S3 Eps 23: Sad Beige Lawsuit Explained w/ Trial Lawyer Thomas Frashier 09/12/2025

S3 Eps 23: Sad Beige Lawsuit Explained w/ Trial Lawyer Thomas Frashier Solo-hosting this week, Peter Taaffe welcomes trial lawyer Thomas Frashier of AZA Law to unpack a first-of-its-kind lawsuit between two Austin influencers—the viral “sad beige” copyright/trade dress case. Thomas explains how the Amazon Influencer/Associates ecosystem really works, why “stealing a vibe” isn’t the same as stealing IP, and how his team defended creator Alyssa Scheele to a decisive win. From pleading standards and the DMCA to likeness rights, PR strategy (yes, including a Beyoncé-quoting answer), and the three-month copyright registration rule, this is a masterclass in modern IP litigation for the social media era. The case ended with the plaintiff dropping all claims—no payment, no gag clauses—and Alyssa preserving her right to tell the story. If you care about creators, brands, and the law colliding online, you’ll love this one. Episode Highlights What the “sad beige” aesthetic is—and what IP law actually protects Inside the Amazon Influencer Program: links, commissions, and Prime Day playbooks The claims: copyright (direct/vicarious), DMCA CMI, trade dress, likeness, and the “kitchen-sink” torts Why “you copied my style” ≠ protectable IP (and where trade dress does apply) The Twombly/Iqbal plausibility bar and why early dismissal is tough in social media cases The three-month rule for statutory damages—and how late registrations undercut the case Damages theories vs. reality: statutory vs. actual and the proof plaintiffs need PR as strategy: a speaking answer, media outreach, and reframing the narrative Deepfakes, NIL, celebrity voice rights, and where likeness law is heading Trial culture at AZA: early responsibility, nationwide cases, and learning from the courtroom Why the case ended: non-suit, no payment, no non-disparagement, and a clean defense win Takeaways for creators: document timing/metadata, avoid monopoly-style demands, and know the ecosystem you’re in /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/38195160

S3 Eps 22: College Football Kickoff w/ Drew Shirley 09/04/2025

S3 Eps 21: Inside the Ryan Smith Murder Trial: Insanity, Defense, and the Fight for Justice 08/22/2025

S3 Eps 20: Steeves Hopson- Big Verdicts, Bold Moves 08/12/2025

S3 Eps 20: Steeves Hopson- Big Verdicts, Bold Moves In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, host Peter Taaffe sits down with attorney Steeves Hopson, founder of Hopson Injury Attorneys, to talk about his bold move from working at top firms to launching his own law practice. Steeves shares his path from growing up in a family full of lawyers, to prosecuting serious cases in Webb County, to landing multiple impressive verdicts just before and after starting his firm. They cover the realities of going solo—from financial preparation and building a personal brand, to grassroots marketing, mentorship, and standing out in a crowded personal injury market. Steeves also walks us through three recent trials, including a tough Texas Tort Claims Act case, a bench trial against a shady defendant, and a dog bite trial with pro se opponents—proving that even “impossible” cases can be worth fighting. This episode is packed with practical advice for young lawyers, candid stories from the courtroom, and insight into what it really takes to make the leap into running your own firm. Show Notes Steeves Hopson’s Background – From Laredo roots to a family of lawyers, including his mother’s career in big law and his uncle’s time as DA in Webb County. Early Legal Career – Stint in employment law, shift to the Webb County DA’s office, and work in the Special Victims Unit during COVID. Transition to Personal Injury – Moves to Houston, working at respected PI firms before deciding to go solo. Why Start Your Own Firm? – Independence, entrepreneurial family influence, and the ability to attract clients. Practical Advice for Going Solo – Save 9–12 months of expenses. Have a clear client acquisition plan. Define your unique brand and niche. Build strong mentorship relationships. Lean Startup Approach – Using co-working spaces, low overhead, and free tools like social media to compete with larger firms. Grassroots Marketing – Authenticity, LinkedIn networking, community engagement, and becoming the “go-to lawyer” for everyone you meet. Case 1: TCA Car Crash Verdict – $265k jury award (capped at $100k), retried after a mistrial due to interpreter issue, strategic use of jury selection themes. Case 2: Bench Trial Negligence Case – $625k judgment for a client blinded by unlicensed stem cell treatments; challenges with judgment-proof defendants. Case 3: Dog Bite Trial in Austin – $198k verdict against pro se defendants; courtroom theater, controlling narrative, and thematic storytelling (“series of bad choices”). Why Try Hard Cases – Even with caps or no insurance, cases can have value for the client and the lawyer’s reputation. Giving Back – Donating a portion of every fee to nonprofit causes as part of the firm’s mission. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/37768915

S3 Eps 19: Inside Texas’s Biggest Verdicts with Randy Sorrels 07/26/2025

S3 Eps 18: Inside the Court of Criminal Appeals with Judge Bert Richardson 07/13/2025

S3 Eps 18: Inside the Court of Criminal Appeals with Judge Bert Richardson In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe and Kyle Herbert sit down with Judge Bert Richardson of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals—Texas' highest criminal court—for a wide-ranging, insightful, and at times hilarious conversation. From the intricacies of writs and actual innocence rulings to statewide judicial campaigns and aerial photography, Judge Richardson shares a lifetime of experiences both inside and outside the courtroom. We explore the significance of wrongful convictions, the inner workings of Texas’ criminal appellate system, the impact of politicizing the judiciary, and what it really means to be a judge in Texas today. Plus—yes—there’s cake, gout, and an epic courtroom tour invite. Show Highlights: 🎂 Amanda’s Birthday Cake Saga: Episode 2 of the dessert-fueled tribute (and Karl's 10% increase in diabetes risk) ⚖️ What Is the Court of Criminal Appeals?: The true role of Texas’ highest criminal court and how it differs from the Supreme Court 🧾 Judge vs. Justice: Clearing up the judicial terminology confusion 📍 Life in the Court: Where the justices work, how they collaborate, and why some can’t visit each other's offices ✍️ Writs 101: Understanding habeas corpus, actual innocence, and the real process behind high-profile exonerations 📚 The Kerry Max Cook Case: A decades-long saga of wrongful conviction, misconduct, and eventual exoneration 📷 Photography Hobby: Judge Richardson’s hidden life as a sports and aviation photographer ✈️ Flying, Track Meets & Warbirds: How photography and the Air Force shaped his life and career 🗳️ Elections vs. Appointments: A candid discussion about the pros and cons of electing judges in Texas 🧠 A Day in the Life of a Judge: Monk-like solitude, Tuesday morning conferences, and behind-the-scenes court operations 🏃‍♂️ The 100-Yard Dash Debate: Who’s faster—Peter or Karl? (The jury's still out) Final Thoughts: Judge Richardson reflects on decades of public service, the evolution of Texas’ courts, and the unexpected adventures that came from staying curious—and staying grounded. Whether you're a legal nerd or just here for the banter, this is an episode you won't want to miss. /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/37390630

Tire Trials, Billion-Dollar Wins & Lemurs on the Loose — with Kyle Farrar 06/26/2025

Tire Trials, Billion-Dollar Wins & Lemurs on the Loose — with Kyle Farrar In this high-powered episode of The Dirty Verdict, the guys welcome legal heavyweight Kyle Farrar, two-time National Trial Lawyer of the Year and appellate ace, for an in-depth look at two of the most talked-about product liability verdicts in the country — including a $31 million Miami verdict and a nearly $1 billion seatbelt defect case against Mitsubishi. From starting a boutique plaintiff’s firm with a loan and a tire case they swore they’d never take, to building a national litigation powerhouse, Kyle recounts his journey in candid, hilarious, and jaw-dropping detail. And yes — they even dive into lemur litigation. Highlights from the Show: 🎯 $31 Million Miami Verdict: How a flying wheel assembly led to a tragic loss — and a high-stakes agency theory trial win. 🏛️ The Mitsubishi Seatbelt Case: A 1992 sports car, rip-stitch seatbelt defect, and a billion-dollar judgment that changed lives. 🧑‍⚖️ Trial Tactics & Jury Strategy: From unique jury selection in Florida to prepping witnesses with master consultants. 🔧 Auto Products & Tire Litigation: How Kyle’s firm came to dominate the nation’s tire defect docket — by accident. 🧠 Mentorship & Firm Building: Starting a firm on fumes, hiring their first lawyer the day Kyle’s son was born, and growing into a national presence. 🐒 The Lemur Case: A surprise detour into Texas’s most unforgettable monkey-mauling mailman lawsuit. 🙌 Faith, Mission Work & Client Humanity: Heartfelt moments from clients whose lives were changed — and how Kyle’s team helped them seek justice. 🗣️ Lawyering in Loud Courtrooms: Miami lawyers, Zoom deposition brawls, and what not to do when pro hac vice. 🎥 Alex Jones Trial Behind the Scenes: Kyle recalls the viral courtroom moment when Jones tried to confront him mid-trial. Bonus: Find out what happens when you tell opposing counsel to "shut your mouth" in a deposition — and why Wes Ball didn’t know he was trying the case until a week in. 📺 Watch the full episode on YouTube 🎧 Listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts & more 🔗 Follow us on LinkedIn, TikTok & Instagram for clips and updates Let me know if you want a shorter version for podcast platforms or a caption for social media! /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/37165620

S3 Eps 16 - Justice of the Peace, Explained (with Judge Steve Duble) 06/13/2025

S3 Eps 16 - Justice of the Peace, Explained (with Judge Steve Duble) In this eye-opening episode of The Dirty Verdict, the team welcomes a truly unique guest: Justice of the Peace Judge Steve Duble. With a no-nonsense yet empathetic approach, Judge Duble offers a behind-the-scenes look at one of the most misunderstood and impactful courts in Texas—JP Court. From eviction cases and consumer debt to animal seizures and mental health dockets, Judge Duble breaks down what really happens in JP court, why it matters, and how he's working to make it more just and accessible for everyone. Whether you're a litigator, a law student, or a curious citizen, this episode is a must-listen for understanding grassroots justice in action. Episode Highlights: 🎙️ Meet Judge Steve Duble: From pro bono eviction work to the JP bench ⚖️ JP Court vs. Civil Court: Different rules, different world 🧾 Why traditional legal procedures don’t apply in JP Court—and what does 🏘️ Evictions 101: Why even multimillion-dollar cases start in JP court 🧠 Mental health dockets, traffic tickets, and dangerous dog cases—yes, really 💸 The debt docket: 6,000+ active cases and how Judge Duble handles them 📲 How technology (and Zoom court) is changing access to justice 📚 Creating a resource center: printed legal forms, free computer access, and more 🧑‍⚖️ Why lawyers don’t need to be lawyers to become a JP in Texas 💥 The most bizarre cases, including HOA drama, dog haircuts, and a sorority party gone wrong 🏛️ Access to Justice: Working with nonprofits, law schools, and the United Way to help those in need 🎓 Advice for young attorneys: Know the 500 Rules and stay flexible 🎯 Future plans: Grants, programs, and why Judge Duble has no desire to move up to a “court of record” Bonus: Find out why The Dirty Verdict still doesn’t have a live JP court stream, and why Kyle and Bill are considering a field trip to test the limits of hotel eviction law. 📍Follow us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook—and yes, even LinkedIn. Stay tuned for upcoming guests and our next podcast road trip. 👉 Learn more about Judge Duble’s access to justice efforts: /episode/index/show/11aaae7f-9681-4586-aed0-9db3b7d70d3e/id/36998600

The Dirty Verdict

TOPICS