Film Jury
Welcome to the Film Jury Podcast - where movies stand trial and the verdict is always final. Step inside the cinematic courtroom. Each episode, a roundtable of passionate film fanatics becomes the jury, dissecting the craft behind the movies we love (and love to debate). From cinematography and sound design to performances, writing, and direction — no detail escapes deliberation. Whether it’s a timeless classic or a polarizing blockbuster, every film deserves its verdict. Expect spirited debates, sharp insights, a few heated objections, and plenty of spoilers along the way.
info_outline
Ghost Ship (2002)
04/24/2026
Ghost Ship (2002)
This week on Film Jury, we’re stepping aboard the infamous Ghost Ship… and it doesn’t take long before things go very, very wrong. Kristina, Kat, and James break down one of the early 2000s’ most memorable horror openings, then dig into everything that follows, for better and mostly worse. From its slick style and wasted potential to the narrative choices that leave you questioning what could have been, the crew examines whether Ghost Ship is a misunderstood cult favorite or just another drifting relic of its era. The verdict? Kristina: Guilty Kat: Guilty James: Guilty A unanimous decision. Sentence: lost at sea. Tune in as we discuss why this film still sticks in people’s minds… even if it doesn’t fully hold together.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40998740
info_outline
Subservience
04/16/2026
Subservience
This April, we’re deep into our “movies so bad we had to build a theme around them” series… and this week might be the breaking point. Kat brought us Subservience, starring Megan Fox… and the jury is not okay. What should have been a sharp, thought-provoking sci-fi thriller instead spirals into a hollow, confused, bargain-bin imitation of better AI films. Flat performances, nonsensical character decisions, and a script that feels like it was generated and never edited… this one tested everyone’s patience. James, Kristina, and Kat all came in ready to evaluate. They left united in frustration. Verdict: Guilty. Of wasting our time, insulting the genre, and making us question our life choices… and our friendship with Kat. If you’ve ever hate-watched a movie and needed validation, this episode is for you.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40894620
info_outline
Freddy vs. Jason
04/07/2026
Freddy vs. Jason
The month of April is upon us and the Film Jury will be deliberating on four films that they hate so much they just had to devote an entire month to the movies. The first entry will be Freddy vs. Jason from 2003 which finally puts the Springwood Slasher up against the king of Crystal Lake in this mash-up flick that was decades in the making. Jurors James, Kat and Kristina dive into the full plot of the film, cinematography, directing, acting, special effects (or lack thereof) and more! The film gets a round of guilty verdicts from the jurors - the first film in the two dozen plus movies reviewed to be sent to film jail.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40754175
info_outline
April Fool's Day (1986)
03/31/2026
April Fool's Day (1986)
In this episode of Film Jury, we put the cult classic April Fool's Day on trial. What starts as a seemingly straightforward slasher quickly twists into something far more unexpected, forcing us to question whether clever storytelling can redeem a film that plays with audience expectations this aggressively. Does the payoff justify the ride, or does it leave viewers feeling cheated? James and Kristina deliver a guilty verdict, arguing that the film’s structure undercuts its own tension and fails to deliver on the promise it builds. Kat, however, stands firmly in the not guilty camp, defending the film’s bold narrative choice and its lasting impact on the genre. Was this an innovative subversion ahead of its time, or a misfire that sacrifices satisfaction for shock value? We break it all down in this episode of Film Jury.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40677305
info_outline
Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon
03/20/2026
Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon
In this episode of Film Jury, we’re diving into the cult horror gem Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon, a sharp, self-aware slasher that pulls back the curtain on what it really takes to become a legendary killer. Told through a documentary-style lens, the film follows Leslie Vernon, an aspiring slasher icon, as he openly walks a film crew through his process, from cardio training to victim selection to the psychology of fear. What unfolds is equal parts horror, satire, and surprisingly smart commentary on the tropes that defined the genre. James, Kat, and Kristina break down the film’s layered storytelling, its deep-cut references to classic slashers, and how it manages to both honor and deconstruct the rules established by icons like Michael, Jason, and Freddy. They also debate whether the film’s tonal shift in the final act elevates it or holds it back. Verdicts are in and it’s a unanimous decision: not guilty. If you love horror that’s as clever as it is bloody, this is one worth revisiting… or discovering for the first time.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40550750
info_outline
The Final Girls (2015)
03/13/2026
The Final Girls (2015)
This week on Film Jury Podcast, James, Kat, and Meagan head to summer camp and put The Final Girls on trial. What starts as a loving parody of classic slasher films quickly turns into something deeper. The film blends horror, comedy, and surprisingly emotional storytelling as a group of friends get trapped inside an 80s slasher movie and must survive by following the genre’s deadly rules. In this episode, the jury digs into: • The film’s clever meta commentary on slasher tropes • How it pays homage to classics like Friday the 13th and Halloween • The emotional core behind the story’s exploration of grief and memory • The filmmaking tricks that make the movie far smarter than it first appears Is it just a nostalgic horror comedy, or is it secretly one of the most thoughtful genre films of the last decade? After reviewing the evidence, James, Kat, and Meagan deliver their verdicts and all three jurors reach the same conclusion. The Final Girls is found NOT GUILTY. If you love horror, meta storytelling, or films that balance laughs with real heart, this is one case you’ll want to hear. Subscribe to Film Jury wherever you listen to podcasts and join the jury each week as we put another movie on trial.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40421865
info_outline
The Cabin in the Woods
03/08/2026
The Cabin in the Woods
The Film Jury deliberates on The Cabin in the Woods, the 2011 cult classic film by Drew Goddard starring Kristen Connolly, Chris Hemsworth, Anna Hutchison, Fran Kranz, Jesse Williams. PLOT: When five college friends arrive at a remote forest cabin for a little vacation, little do they expect the horrors that await them. One by one, the youths fall victim to backwoods zombies, but there is another factor at play. Two scientists (Richard Jenkins, Bradley Whitford) are manipulating the ghoulish goings-on, but even as the body count rises, there is yet more at work than meets the eye. Jurors James Patrick, Heidi Romans and Kat Stratford break down every scene, discuss the acting, cinematography, directing, pacing and writing to give their final verdict. Unanimous NOT GUILTY as The Cabin in the Woods is fully acquitted.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40356195
info_outline
Watcher (2022)
03/01/2026
Watcher (2022)
The Film Jury deliberates on Watcher from 2022 starring Maika Monroe and directed by Chloe Okuno in her directorial debut. The jurors dive into the plot of the film, the cinematography, acting, pacing as well as hidden gems throughout the movie. James and Kat both judged the film as not guilty while Kristina gave a barely passing not guilty verdict.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40267525
info_outline
Possession (1981)
02/19/2026
Possession (1981)
In this episode of Film Jury, we put Possession on trial. Directed by Andrzej Żuławski and starring Isabelle Adjani and Sam Neill, this cult psychological horror has built a reputation as one of the most disturbing films ever made. But is it brilliant… or just unhinged? James votes GUILTY. Kat votes GUILTY. Kristina stands alone with a bold NOT GUILTY. We break down: • The Berlin Wall as a metaphor for emotional division • The infamous subway scene and what is actually happening • The monster, the doubles, and the collapse of identity • Whether Heinrich is a real rival or a stepping stone • The espionage subplot and the meaning of the pink socks • And the explosive ending that leaves no one untouched Is this film a masterpiece about divorce and psychological annihilation? Or an indulgent spiral of hysteria dressed up as art? The jury debates performance intensity, symbolism overload, and whether the chaos is intentional genius or emotional excess. One thing is certain. Nobody walks away neutral. Court is in session.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40170115
info_outline
Crimson Peak
02/13/2026
Crimson Peak
🎬 Film Jury Podcast: Crimson Peak on Trial Court is back in session. In this episode of Film Jury, James Patrick is joined by Kat Reynolds and Heidi Romans to dissect Crimson Peak, directed by Guillermo del Toro. As part of the show’s “Love Hurts” series, the jury debates whether this lush Gothic romance was misunderstood at release… or simply overindulgent. Was it wrongly marketed as a horror film? Is it a love story in disguise? And does stunning production design make up for underwritten characters? The Charges Improper Marketing: Sold as a haunted house horror, delivered as a Gothic romance in the tradition of Bluebeard. Visual Brilliance vs. Narrative Depth: Jaw-dropping cinematography, saturated reds and greens, meticulous costuming… but are the characters fully developed? CGI vs. Practical Effects: A heated debate over the film’s ghost design and whether del Toro’s reliance on CGI undercuts the immersion. The Real Monster: In classic del Toro fashion, are the true villains supernatural… or human? What We Deliberate The symbolic use of color and costume to track Edith’s transformation. Del Toro’s recurring themes of reframing “monster” versus “human,” seen in films like Pan's Labyrinth and The Shape of Water. Tom Hiddleston’s baronet energy and whether Sir Thomas is a romantic lead or something far more sinister. The underwritten Alan debate. Romantic hero or narrative afterthought? Why this film might have worked better as a limited series. Performances on the Stand Tom Hiddleston as Sir Thomas Sharpe Jessica Chastain as Lucille Sharpe Charlie Hunnam as Alan McMichael Mia Wasikowska as Edith Cushing Expect Strong opinions. Respectful disagreement. One host threatening to flip a metaphorical table. Is Crimson Peak a misunderstood Gothic masterpiece? A visually stunning but emotionally thin experience? Or a film that deserves admiration even if it doesn’t earn affection? The verdict is final. 🎧 Warning: Major spoilers ahead.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40095670
info_outline
It Follows
02/06/2026
It Follows
On this episode of Film Jury, jurors James, Kat, and Kristina put It Follows on trial. What begins as a minimalist horror premise unfolds into a deeply unsettling meditation on inevitability, trauma, sexuality, and time. The jury breaks down the film scene by scene, unpacking its symbolic language. The walking entity. The role of water and blood. The use of classic monster movies. The anachronistic setting. The way fear invades classrooms, bedrooms, pools, and family homes. Nothing is accidental, and nothing offers easy answers. Is It Follows a morality tale, a coming-of-age nightmare, or an existential horror about death itself? After examining its themes, symbolism, and lasting impact, the jury delivers a unanimous verdict. James: Not Guilty. Kat: Not Guilty. Kristina: Not Guilty. It Follows walks away free, still following, and still haunting long after the credits roll.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/40019435
info_outline
The Ritual
01/27/2026
The Ritual
In this episode of The Film Jury Podcast, we put The Ritual (2017) on trial. Directed by David Bruckner and adapted from Adam Nevill’s novel, The Ritual follows four friends who venture into the forests of Sweden to honor a fallen companion. What begins as a grief-driven hiking trip quickly becomes a descent into isolation, psychological terror, and ancient horror rooted in Norse mythology. Jurors James, Kat, and Meagan examine the film’s slow-burn approach, unsettling atmosphere, creature design, and thematic focus on guilt, trauma, and survival. We debate the effectiveness of the mythology, the shift in tone during the final act, and where The Ritual fits within the modern folk horror landscape. After deliberation, all three jurors return NOT GUILTY verdicts, finding The Ritual to be a haunting and effective entry in contemporary horror that earns its reputation through mood, tension, and mythic dread. If you enjoy thoughtful horror breakdowns, courtroom-style verdicts, and deep dives into what makes a genre film work or fail, this episode is for you. Subscribe to The Film Jury Podcast for more horror trials and final verdicts.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39892380
info_outline
Critters
01/20/2026
Critters
This week on The Film Jury, we put the 1986 cult classic Critters on trial. Furry aliens, bounty hunters with questionable disguises, and small town chaos are all entered into evidence as jurors James, Kat, and Meagan revisit the horror comedy that helped define a generation of VHS rentals. Does Critters hold up as a clever genre mashup, or is it pure nostalgia fueled chaos? We examine the film’s creature effects, tone, scares, humor, and overall execution, then debate whether it deserves cult status or a cinematic conviction. After careful deliberation, all three jurors return the same verdict. Not guilty. Critters walks free, claws and all. Tune in for sharp analysis, fun arguments, and a verdict that might surprise you if you have not revisited this one in years.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39794095
info_outline
Feast (2005)
01/13/2026
Feast (2005)
In this episode of The Film Jury Podcast, jurors James, Heidi, and Kat put the cult horror-comedy Feast (2005) on trial and unanimously deliver a Not Guilty verdict. Directed by John Gulager and produced through Project Greenlight with backing from Ben Affleck, Matt Damon, and Wes Craven, Feast is a chaotic, blood-soaked monster movie that gleefully breaks horror rules. Set almost entirely inside a remote desert bar, the film traps a group of strangers as they fight for survival against relentless and grotesque creatures with no interest in playing fair. The jury breaks down the film’s bold tonal swings between horror and comedy, its unapologetic gore, and its meta approach to character archetypes and on-screen “rules.” They also discuss Gulager’s fast-paced, aggressive directing style and how the film embraces shock value as part of its identity rather than a gimmick. The episode dives into performances from Balthazar Getty, Navi Rawat, Krista Allen, Henry Rollins, and Judah Friedlander, along with memorable cameos that helped cement Feast as a cult favorite. From creature design to editing choices and audience expectations, the jury examines why this scrappy, no-holds-barred horror film still resonates with genre fans nearly two decades later. Is Feast crude, chaotic, and excessive? Absolutely. And according to the Film Jury, that is exactly why it works. Verdict: Not Guilty.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39710015
info_outline
The Descent
01/06/2026
The Descent
Welcome to The Film Jury, where your jurors of cinema—James, Kat & Heidi—deliver verdicts on some of the most fascinating films in genre history. In this episode, we drop into the claustrophobic, terrifying world of The Descent (2005). Directed by Neil Marshall and starring Shauna Macdonald, Natalie Mendoza, Alex Reid, MyAnna Buring, Nora Jane Noone, and Sadie Frost, The Descent redefined modern horror with its blend of psychological dread and raw, subterranean terror. All three jurors returned not guilty verdicts, but that only scratches the surface of our conversation. We dig deep into: • Directing choices that keep tension unrelenting • Cinematography and how darkness becomes a character • Sound design & score that messes with your nerves • Hidden Easter eggs you probably missed • Character arcs, feminist horror elements, and more Whether you’re a longtime fan or hearing about this horror classic for the first time, this breakdown has something for every cinephile. Hit play and step back into the cave—if you dare.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39622135
info_outline
Silent Night, Deadly Night (2025)
12/29/2025
Silent Night, Deadly Night (2025)
Join James, Meagan, and Kat as we serve on the jury for Silent Night Deadly Night 2025 and deliver a unanimous Not Guilty verdict with pure enthusiasm! This episode is your ultimate holiday horror movie review, diving deep into the latest slasher film reboot, its shocking twists, and the performances that make it unforgettable. In this episode, we cover: Plot Breakdown: The 2025 Silent Night Deadly Night reboot revisits the cult classic story of Billy Chapman, played by Rohan Campbell, a haunted killer-Santa driven by trauma and dark impulses. We explore how his relationship with Pamela Sims (Ruby Modine) adds emotional depth to the film’s Christmas horror chaos. Cast and Characters: Detailed discussion on Rohan Campbell’s portrayal of Billy, Ruby Modine’s standout turn as Pamela, and the supporting cast who bring both terror and heart to this modern slasher. Themes and Tone: From psychological depth to bloody holiday thrills, we analyze how director Mike P. Nelson blends holiday horror, slasher suspense, and dark satire to elevate this reboot. Production and Release Insights: Filmed in the snowy landscapes of Manitoba, Canada, and premiered at Fantastic Fest before its U.S. release, this Silent Night Deadly Night 2025 review highlights why fans and critics are talking. Spoiler Discussion & Verdict: Spoilers included! We explain why this installment earns our enthusiastic Not Guilty verdict, covering practical effects, plot twists, and emotional beats that make this a must-watch for Christmas slasher fans. Whether you’re a fan of horror podcasts, holiday horror movies, slasher film reboots, or just love spirited discussions about cult classics, this episode is for you. Tune in now on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and all major platforms for your Silent Night Deadly Night 2025 review, complete with laughs, gore, and plenty of holiday cheer.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39554080
info_outline
Silent Night, Deadly Night (1984)
12/22/2025
Silent Night, Deadly Night (1984)
As our Holiday Horror series continues, The Film Jury turns its attention to one of the most controversial slashers of the 1980s. This week, James, Kat, and Meagan review Silent Night, Deadly Night (1984), the infamous Christmas slasher directed by Charles E. Sellier Jr. and written by Michael Hickey. Starring Robert Brian Wilson, Lilyan Chauvin, Gilmer McCormick, and Linnea Quigley, the film follows a traumatized young man who dons a Santa suit and embarks on a murderous rampage fueled by childhood trauma, religious guilt, and a deeply confused moral message. In this episode, the Jury pulls no punches. We break down: • The film’s troubled production and cultural backlash • Its reliance on shock value over storytelling • Weak performances and inconsistent tone • Problematic themes and exploitative execution • Why controversy does not equal quality • How the film became notorious despite its flaws The Verdict: James — Guilty Kat — Guilty Meagan — Guilty FINAL JUDGMENT: Unanimous Guilty Verdict While Silent Night, Deadly Night has earned cult infamy and a place in horror history, the Film Jury finds it fundamentally broken in execution, intent, and impact. Sometimes a movie is remembered not because it’s good, but because it’s loud. Listen now as we continue our December deep dive into holiday horror, separating seasonal classics from cinematic coal.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39497430
info_outline
Black Christmas (1974)
12/15/2025
Black Christmas (1974)
This week, The Film Jury dives into the 1974 horror classic Black Christmas, the original slasher that helped define the genre long before Halloween or Friday the 13th. Directed by Bob Clark and written by A. Roy Moore, this cult favorite blends holiday cheer with chilling suspense, a creeping sense of dread, and some of the most iconic early slasher techniques in cinematic history. Starring Olivia Hussey, Keir Dullea, Margot Kidder, and John Saxon, the film follows a group of sorority sisters who begin receiving terrifying phone calls and threats during the Christmas holiday. As tension mounts and murders escalate, no one is safe — and the line between safety and horror disappears. In this episode, the Jury discusses: How Black Christmas influenced the modern slasher genre The performances of Olivia Hussey, Margot Kidder, and the ensemble cast Bob Clark’s use of suspense, framing, and sound design to create terror The film’s lasting legacy in holiday horror and cult cinema Why this classic still resonates with audiences decades later NEW RANKING SYSTEM — Full Acquittal James — Not Guilty Kristina — Not Guilty Heidi — Not Guilty The Film Jury delivers a unanimous verdict: Black Christmas (1974) remains a chilling, masterful classic that continues to haunt holiday horror fans. Tune in for our full discussion, and see why this seminal slasher still holds up as a must-watch for horror enthusiasts.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39418305
info_outline
Anna and the Apocalypse
12/09/2025
Anna and the Apocalypse
The Film Jury is back with a festive blood-soaked verdict as James, Kristina, and Heidi take on the cult favorite Anna and the Apocalypse (2017), the wildly inventive Christmas zombie musical directed by John McPhail and written by Alan McDonald and the late Ryan McHenry. Starring Ella Hunt, Malcolm Cumming, Sarah Swire, Christopher Leveaux, Ben Wiggins, Marli Siu, and Mark Benton, this genre-blending film mashes up holiday cheer, high-school drama, infectious musical numbers, and a full-scale zombie outbreak—and somehow makes it all work. In this episode, the Jury breaks down: – Why the film’s musical sequences elevate the horror-comedy format – How the cast brings surprising emotional weight to the chaos – The movie’s mix of camp, heart, and genuine apocalypse stakes – What makes this one of the most unique holiday horror films in years – Whether the film deserves its growing cult status The Verdict: James — Not Guilty Kristina — Not Guilty Heidi — Not Guilty FINAL JUDGMENT: Full Acquittal 🎬 If you love horror-comedy, zombie movies, offbeat musicals, or alternative Christmas films, this episode delivers a full breakdown of why Anna and the Apocalypse continues to stand out in the genre. Listen now and let The Film Jury decide your holiday watchlist.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39331715
info_outline
IT: Chapter 2
12/01/2025
IT: Chapter 2
The Losers’ Club returns to Derry—older, traumatized, and still bound by a childhood nightmare they hoped they’d escaped. This week on Film Jury, we dive deep into IT Chapter II (2019), directed by Andy Muschietti and based on Stephen King’s legendary novel. Stacked with an impressive adult cast including James McAvoy (Bill), Jessica Chastain (Beverly), Bill Hader (Richie), Isaiah Mustafa (Mike), Jay Ryan (Ben), James Ransone (Eddie), and Bill Skarsgård returning as Pennywise the Dancing Clown, the film attempts to blend cosmic horror, emotional closure, and surreal creature spectacle into one massive final chapter. But did it succeed? James comes in with a brutal 1/5 gavels, citing pacing issues, tonal imbalance, and an overreliance on CGI. Kristina lands at 3/5 gavels, praising the performances—especially Hader—and some standout emotional moments. Heidi gives it 2/5 gavels, feeling the story couldn’t quite support its nearly 3-hour runtime. We break down: • How the film adapts (and alters) the book’s ending • The missed opportunities in character arcs • Whether Pennywise is still scary the second time around • The strengths of the cast vs. the weakness of the structure • The themes of trauma, memory, and returning home • And why this sequel divided audiences and critics alike Epic, messy, heartfelt, bizarre—IT Chapter II is a lot. And this week, The Jury has opinions. Tune in, listen to the verdict, and see where you stand.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39225410
info_outline
IT: Chapter 1
11/24/2025
IT: Chapter 1
The Film Jury returns to Derry as we dive into IT: Chapter One (2017) — the blockbuster Stephen King adaptation that redefined Pennywise for a new generation. Directed by Andy Muschietti, this modern retelling shifts the story fully into the 1980s, blending coming-of-age adventure with some of the most iconic horror imagery of the decade. Starring Bill Skarsgård as Pennywise the Dancing Clown and a phenomenal young cast including Jaeden Martell, Finn Wolfhard, Sophia Lillis, Jack Dylan Grazer, Chosen Jacobs, Jeremy Ray Taylor, and Wyatt Oleff, the film follows the Losers’ Club as they uncover the ancient evil terrorizing their town — and confront their deepest fears along the way. Hosts James Patrick, Kristina Patrick, and Heidi Romans break down: • Bill Skarsgård’s terrifying re-imagining of Pennywise • The chemistry and performances of the Losers’ Club • How the film balances heart, humor, and horror • The shift to an ’80s setting and why it works • Which scares land, which ones don’t, and how well it adapts King’s massive novel The Verdict — 11/15 Gavels James — 3/5 Kristina — 4/5 Heidi — 4/5 Is IT: Chapter One a modern horror classic or an overhyped blockbuster with great makeup? Join The Film Jury as we render our official verdict on one of the biggest horror films of the decade. New episodes drop weekly — subscribe for honest reviews and cinematic judgments.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39150805
info_outline
Predator: Badlands
11/16/2025
Predator: Badlands
The hunt is on. The Film Jury assembles for a brutal new hunt in Predator: Badlands (2025) — the latest Predator film directed by Dan Trachtenberg. Starring Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi as Dek (a young, exiled Yautja) and Elle Fanning as Thia (a damaged synthetic), the film throws survival horror into overdrive on a hostile alien world. Hosts James Patrick, Kat Stratford, and Alabama Deer break down: The shift in perspective — for the first time, a Predator is the protagonist. The visual style and world-building of Trachtenberg’s direction. How Dek and Thia’s unlikely alliance plays out, emotionally and thematically. The action, creature design, and whether this entry feels fresh or derivative. Whether Badlands advances Predator mythology or leans too hard into nostalgia. The Verdict — 12/15 Gavels James Patrick — 3/5 Gavels Kat Stratford — 5/5 Gavels Alabama — 4/5 Gavels Does Predator: Badlands prove that Predators can be heroes? Or is it another wild hunt that loses its way? Tune in and render your verdict. 🔔 Subscribe to The Film Jury for weekly breakdowns, honest reviews, and verdicts that don’t shy away from the claws.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/39053060
info_outline
Frankenstein (2025)
11/11/2025
Frankenstein (2025)
The Film Jury resurrects a classic tale for Episode 5 as we review Frankenstein (2025) — the bold new reimagining of Mary Shelley’s iconic story. Directed by Guillermo del Toro, this modern adaptation pushes the legend of Victor Frankenstein into darker, more psychological territory while honoring the spirit of the original novel. Starring Oscar Isaac as Victor Frankenstein, Jacob Elordi as the Creature, and Mia Goth as Elizabeth, the 2025 version reinvents the dynamic between creator and creation with emotional intimacy, striking production design, and a tone that blends gothic horror with contemporary moral dread. Hosts James Patrick, Meagan Jones, and Jose Acevedo break down the film's atmospheric visuals, its character-driven storytelling, and the new thematic elements introduced in this adaptation. The panel explores how the film reframes ideas of identity, responsibility, and monstrosity — and why this version may be the most resonant interpretation in years. The Verdict — 12/15 Gavels James Patrick — 4/5 Gavels Meagan Jones — 4/5 Gavels Jose Acevedo — 4/5 Gavels Does Frankenstein (2025) breathe new life into a classic masterpiece, or does it stretch too far from its roots? Join The Film Jury as we deliver our official verdict. Listen now on all major podcast platforms and follow for weekly reviews, deep dives, and cinematic judgments.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/38988345
info_outline
IT (1990)
11/05/2025
IT (1990)
The Film Jury heads back to Derry, Maine, to revisit the iconic 1990 miniseries adaptation of Stephen King’s IT. Directed by Tommy Lee Wallace and starring Tim Curry, Jonathan Brandis, Richard Thomas, Seth Green, and Annette O’Toole, this TV classic terrified a generation — but how well does it hold up over three decades later? Hosts James Patrick, Kristina Patrick, and Heidi Romans dive deep into the two-part structure, the limitations of network television horror in the early ’90s, and the enduring legacy of Curry’s legendary performance as Pennywise the Dancing Clown. The panel debates the film’s pacing, character dynamics, special effects, and how it compares to modern horror standards and the later cinematic remakes. The Verdict — 8/15 Gavels James Patrick — 2/5 Gavels Kristina Patrick — 3/5 Gavels Heidi Romans — 3/5 Gavels Does IT (1990) still float… or is nostalgia the only thing keeping it above water? Join us as The Film Jury renders its verdict on one of horror’s most memorable TV events. Listen now on all major podcast platforms and follow for more weekly reviews, breakdowns, and cinematic trials. #IT1990 #StephenKing #Pennywise #TimCurry #HorrorReview #FilmJuryPodcast #MovieReview #HorrorCommunity #StephenKingAdaptation #HorrorClassic #90sHorror #DerryMaine #CultHorror #TVMiniseries #HorrorFans
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/38917790
info_outline
Oddity
10/27/2025
Oddity
The Film Jury is back in session to rule on Oddity (2024), the acclaimed Irish supernatural horror film from writer-director Damian Mc Carthy. Hosts James Patrick, Meagan Jones, and Kristina Patrick dive into one of the year’s most talked-about genre entries — a chilling, stylish blend of grief, revenge, and the uncanny. Starring Carolyn Bracken, Gwilym Lee, and Caroline Menton, Oddity follows a blind medium who returns to confront her sister’s killer, armed with a mysterious wooden mannequin and a growing sense that something otherworldly seeks justice of its own. The panel dissects the film’s inventive scares, meticulous sound design, and practical effects, praising Mc Carthy’s command of tension and eerie atmosphere. From its emotional undercurrent to its shocking finale, the trio debates whether Oddity earns its status as a modern horror standout or merely teases greatness from the shadows. The Verdict: 11/15 Gavels James Patrick — 4/5 Gavels: Meagan Jones — 3/5 Gavels: Kristina Patrick — 4/5 Gavels: Tune in as The Film Jury renders its verdict on Oddity and examines why this small-scale indie is making such a big impression in the world of horror cinema. Listen now on all major podcast platforms and follow for more reviews, deep dives, and cinematic cross-examinations.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/38800950
info_outline
Dangerous Animals
10/27/2025
Dangerous Animals
The Film Jury returns to the courtroom of cinema for its second case: Dangerous Animals (2025) — a dark psychological thriller that slithers between ambition, obsession, and survival. Hosts James Patrick, Meagan Jones, and Denise Black sink their teeth into the film’s moral tension, unpredictable twists, and slow-burn performances to determine whether this creature of a movie is a predator or just all bark. Written and directed by David Farr, Dangerous Animals stars David Dastmalchian, Katie Leung, and Tuppence Middleton in a tense story of a journalist drawn into a deadly web while investigating an enigmatic tech billionaire. The hosts explore the film’s sharp social commentary, striking cinematography, and unnerving tone that blends corporate satire with primal suspense. From its layered character work to its shocking third act, the panel debates: does Dangerous Animals truly bare its fangs, or does it play too safe? The Verdict: 9/15 Gavels Meagan Jones — 3/5 Gavels Denise Black — 3/5 Gavels James Patrick — 3/5 Gavels: Join The Film Jury as we deliberate whether Dangerous Animals deserves your attention or should quietly retreat into the cinematic wilderness. Listen now on all major podcast platforms and follow for upcoming reviews of new releases, cult gems, and films that divide audiences and critics alike.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/38800740
info_outline
Shelby Oaks
10/27/2025
Shelby Oaks
The Film Jury is officially in session! In our debut episode, hosts James Patrick, Kat Stratford, and Kristina Patrick take on the haunting new supernatural horror film Shelby Oaks (2024 / 2025) — the long-awaited directorial debut from filmmaker and YouTuber Chris Stuckmann. The trio dives deep into the mystery behind the movie’s production delays, its ambitious story of grief and trauma, and whether the hype surrounding Stuckmann’s first feature was ultimately justified. Starring Camille Sullivan, Michael Beach, Robin Bartlett, Keith David, and Brendan Sexton III, Shelby Oaks follows a woman’s desperate search for her missing sister — one of the members of a paranormal investigation group known as The Paranormal Paranoids. As the truth unfolds, she’s forced to confront supernatural forces and buried guilt in a film that blends indie drama with psychological horror. The panel debates everything from the film’s tone and pacing to its cinematography, score, and emotional payoff. Is it a bold debut, a misfire, or something in between? The Verdict: 9/15 Gavels Kat Stratford — 4/5 Gavels Kristina Patrick — 3/5 Gavels James Patrick — 2/5 Gavels Join The Film Jury as we render our first official verdict and decide whether Shelby Oaks deserves your attention or should stay buried in the archives of the Paranormal Paranoids. Listen now on all major podcast platforms and follow along for future episodes reviewing new releases, cult classics, and cinematic controversies.
/episode/index/show/3b0a24bc-20c4-4a79-a79b-9b5c4c52bef2/id/38800575