alexis karpouzos's podcast

Alexis karpouzos (Born, April 09, 1967 in Athens) is an Greek-born Philosopher, Spiritual Teacher and Author. Alexis karpouzos passionate engagement with tensions at the heart of creativity give strength to his call for an individual and collective evolutionary leap forward. Alexis karpouzos is the teacher of the essence of spiritual conscious evolution and its social contribution. The poetic thought of Alexis karpouzos is a expressions of soul's inner experiences, expression of universality. The inspiring visual images and the symbolic use of language offer a description of elevating experiences of consciousness, a glimpse of higher worlds. The philosophy of alexis karpouzos speak to the human experience from a universal perspective, trancending all religions, cultural and national boundaries. Using vivid images and a direct language that speaks to the heart, his philosophy evokes a sense of deep communication with the collective unconscious, a sense of connection to all the creatures of the world, compassion for others, admiration for the beauty of nature, reverence for all life, and an abiding faith in the invisible touch of world. Alexis karpouzos thoughts are often terse and paradoxical, challenging us to to break out of the box of limiting beliefs and see things from a new perspective. Above all, alexis karpouzos continually calls to us to wake up and exlpore the mysteries within our own selves, i.e the mysteries of universe.

THE POST - ONTOLOGICAL THOUGHT - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 02/13/2026

THE POST - ONTOLOGICAL THOUGHT - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS A Paradigm Shift in 21st Century Philosophy The Post-Ontological Thought of Alexis Karpouzos offers a groundbreaking re-examination of traditional metaphysics and philosophy. Emerging from a landscape where classical ontological inquiries often centered on the static nature of being, Karpouzos’s thought departs significantly, proposing a fluid, dynamic approach to understanding existence. His work intertwines metaphysics with contemporary social sciences, challenging us to rethink the foundations of reality, presence, and consciousness. 1. Deconstructing Metaphysics Deconstructing metaphysics begins with questioning the fundamental assumptions that have long governed philosophical inquiry about being and existence. Karpouzos critically engages with classical ontological paradigms, emphasizing that metaphysics should no longer be seen as a static foundation but as a dynamic process intertwined with social and existential realities. Karpouzos replaces fixed essences with fluid, emergent processes. His methodology involves deconstructing Western binaries—such as being/non-being and reality/illusion—moving toward a "reconstructivism" focused on relationships and becoming. 2. Beyond Being: The Emphasis on Becoming At the heart of Karpouzos’ philosophy lies a profound shift from "being" to "becoming." He advocates that existence is a continuous process rather than a fixed state. Philosophy, in this view, ceases to be an inquiry into what exists and becomes a study of how things emerge, transform, and connect within a web of interactions. 3. The Post-Ontological Turn The post-ontological turn signifies a movement away from conventional metaphysical absolutes towards fluidity, contingency, and relationality. Karpouzos rethinks fundamental concepts like essence, existence, and causality, proposing that these categories are constructs emerging from interconnected processes. This approach aligns with contemporary debates on complexity, chaos, and emergence. +2 4. Critique of Traditional Metaphysics Karpouzos critiques traditional metaphysics for its tendency to reduce existence to a static, essentialist framework. He highlights how these classical systems neglect the living, dynamic aspects of reality. This critique is also social and political, questioning how ontological assumptions shape power dynamics and societal structures. 5. Implications for Contemporary Debates The post-ontological perspective has profound implications for consciousness, identity, and social justice: Consciousness: Viewed as an emergent process shaped by social interaction and existential reality. Social Sciences: Fosters a nuanced analysis of power and inequality, aligning with Actor-Network Theory and relational sociology. 6. Key Concepts: Emergence, Relationality, and Processuality Central to this framework are three pillars: Emergence: New forms of organization or consciousness arising from complex interactions. Relationality: The shift from viewing entities as independent to understanding them as nodes in an intricate web. Processuality: The emphasis on ongoing change over fixed states. 7. Relevance in the 21st Century In an era of rapid technological and ecological transformation, Karpouzos’s emphasis on interconnectedness provides tools to navigate climate change, social fragmentation, and information overload. It promotes a human-centered view where we are not isolated individuals but active participants co-creating the fabric of reality. 8. Comparative Philosophy While sharing affinities with Process Philosophy (Whitehead), Phenomenology, and Systems Theory, Karpouzos diverges through his integrative ambition. Unlike post-structuralism, he maintains a constructive ontology, advocating for active engagement in shaping reality through collective effort and dialogue. 9. Future Directions The evolution of post-ontological philosophy beckons for further interdisciplinary research, bridging: Physics: Quantum physics and the nature of reality. Neuroscience: The fluid nature of the mind. Indigenous Wisdom: Engaging with non-Western relational epistemologies. Conclusion The Post-Ontological Thought of Alexis Karpouzos represents a transformative shift, replacing static essentialism with a dynamic vision of reality. By rethinking the relationship between being and becoming, Karpouzos offers a philosophy that is not merely an abstract exercise but a participatory project—an active process of world-building for the 21st century. /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/40096765

THE SPHERICAL SPACETIME -ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 02/13/2026

THE SPHERICAL SPACETIME -ALEXIS KARPOUZOS Spherical Spacetime: The Metaphysical Vision of Alexis Karpouzos Spherical Spacetime is one of the most profound and original concepts in the philosophy of Alexis Karpouzos. It does not refer to a mathematical or physical description like those found in the theory of relativity (e.g., a sphere-shaped curved spacetime), but rather to a metaphysical and holistic vision of the universe. It is a dynamic, transformative structure that unites space, time, consciousness, and "the void" into an eternal movement of creation and destruction. Core Characteristics of Spherical Spacetime Sphericity and Wholeness: The term "spherical" symbolizes the omni-centric and symmetrical nature of reality—there is no privileged center; instead, every point is the center. It is the sum-total of all perspectives: an invisible, fleeting center that relates and coordinates all differences, viewpoints, and experiences without flattening them. It ensures unity within multiplicity. Inseparability from the Void: Spherical spacetime is inseparable from absolute zero (the vacuum, the void). Nothing "exists" as a fixed constant—it is created and destroyed simultaneously. This means that existence is not permanent, but a continuous transformation emerging from the void and returning to it in a cycle of creation-destruction. Transformations and Indeterminacy: Its transformations are indeterminate and eternal. They do not follow a linear progression but a spiral movement. Within this spacetime, binary oppositions (e.g., Being/non-Being, light/dark, subject/object) are inscribed where they shift, negate one another, and coexist without contradiction, thanks to paradoxical logic. Connection to Consciousness and Evolution: Every human and living being is constituted by this spherical spacetime. It is the holistic unit of information connecting the microcosm (the atom) to the macrocosm (the universe). The evolution of consciousness occurs through the awareness of this spherical spacetime, where time is non-chronological and space is "atopic" (placeless). Relation to Other Concepts in Karpouzos' Thought Concept Relationship to Spherical Spacetime Relational Ontology Spherical spacetime is the ultimate web of relations—everything exists only through interdependence. Metaphysical Openness Openness arises because spacetime is indeterminate and constantly transforming. The Diagonal Path The path crosses "diagonally" through oppositions and inscribes them into this spherical structure. Paradoxical Logic The logic that embraces contradictions precisely because spherical spacetime incorporates them without conflict. Key Idea: Transcending Linearity Alexis Karpouzos proposes that spacetime is not linear, flat, or infinitely straight (as described by classical physics), but spherical, closed-and-simultaneously-open, omnitemporal, and non-local. In other words, time and space are not separate, independent dimensions, but form a spherical structure where past, present, and future coexist simultaneously in the Timeless state. 1. Omnitemporality All moments of time exist simultaneously. The past is not "lost," and the future is not "yet to come." They are all present at different points on the spherical surface of spacetime. The linear sense of time is merely an illusion of limited human perception. 2. Non-locality and Spherical Closure Just as a sphere has no "beginning" or "end" (if you travel straight around the Earth, you return to the same point), so it is with the universe: every point is simultaneously center and periphery. This connects directly to quantum non-locality (entanglement) and David Bohm’s idea of the "holographic universe." 3. Timeless Time When consciousness is liberated from the linear narrative of the ego, it experiences spacetime as spherical: everything happens at once in an eternally present unity. 4. Spacetime as Consciousness Spherical spacetime is not just a physical structure—it is a structure of universal consciousness. Consciousness is not within spacetime; spacetime is a manifestation of consciousness. When human consciousness "awakens," it can experience this sphericity through deep meditative experience or poetic insight. 5. Transcending Causality In spherical spacetime, there is no strict "cause → effect" determinism in the linear sense. Events influence each other cyclically and simultaneously (akin to quantum phenomena where the future may influence the past—retrocausality). The Metaphor of the Horizon "Imagine you are standing on the surface of a vast sphere. Everywhere you look, the horizon curves and returns to you. Time is exactly like that: every moment is the horizon of the other. Your past looks at you from your future, and your future is already present within you." Spherical spacetime is the cosmological expression of the non-dual, holistic, and paradoxical reality proposed by Karpouzos: a universe where everything is simultaneously One and Many, present and boundless, closed and infinitely open. /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/40096680

KNOWLEDGE AND WISDOM - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 02/13/2026

KNOWLEDGE AND WISDOM - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS KNOWLEDGE — WISDOM: ALEXIS KARPOUZOS From the earliest myths and Pre-Socratic cosmologies to the science of modernity, humanity has sought to understand, classify, and explain the world. Knowledge refers to the process of understanding phenomena. Wisdom, by contrast, concerns the understanding of the meaning behind those phenomena. Knowledge is analytical, wisdom is synthetic; knowledge separates, wisdom unites. The philosophical question posed is: can human beings transform knowledge into wisdom? That is, can one move from the science of the real to the consciousness of Being? 1. Knowledge as the Logic of Distinction In Platonic philosophy, knowledge (episteme) is contrasted with mere doxa (opinion). In the Republic (VI, 509d), Plato places knowledge within a hierarchy culminating in the noesis of the Good—the pure vision of truth. Aristotle, in his Metaphysics, attributes to knowledge the character of causal understanding: "all men by nature desire to know." Knowledge is, therefore, an exit from ignorance and an appropriation of the world through reason. 2. Knowledge as Power and Limitation With the Enlightenment and Modernity, knowledge is transformed into a means of power. Francis Bacon declares that "Knowledge is Power," founding the spirit of the scientific age. However, as Martin Heidegger showed in The Question Concerning Technology (1954), this identification of knowledge with power leads to an anthropocentric oblivion of Being, where the world becomes a mere standing reserve (Bestand) for use. Knowledge, severed from wisdom, ceases to reveal and begins to control. Consequently, knowledge moves within linear and causal time; it is the product of analysis, logic, and method. Yet, as Heraclitus would argue, "much learning does not teach understanding"—the accumulation of information does not necessarily lead to prudence. Reason (Logos) must be connected to the xynon—the common meaning of the Whole—to be transformed into wisdom. 3. Wisdom as Insight and Participation in the Whole Wisdom, unlike knowledge, is an experience of unity. Heraclitus views wisdom as the understanding of the Logos of the world—the unity within the conflict of opposites: "all things are one." Plotinus, in the Enneads, describes wisdom as the return of the soul to the One, where the intellect falls silent and thought is transformed into vision (theoria). Wisdom is, therefore, meta-logical; it does not negate reason but transcends it. Like Nietzsche in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, wisdom is not the result of syllogism, but a tragic acceptance of the unity of life and death. 4. Wisdom in Eastern Traditions In Taoist and Buddhist thought, wisdom (prajñā) is identified with non-duality: the experience that subject and object, visible and invisible, are but manifestations of the same whole. Lao Tzu writes: "The wise man knows without knowing, acts without acting" (Tao Te Ching, ch. 2). This non-adversarial stance toward the world is close to the spirit of Karpouzos, who links wisdom with empathy for the Whole, with the awareness that existence is not isolated but participatory. 5. The Dialectical Relationship of Knowledge and Wisdom Knowledge and wisdom, rather than being opposed, constitute two dialectical stages of human consciousness. Hegel, in the Phenomenology of Spirit (1807), describes the process of transmuting knowledge through sublation (Aufhebung), where the particular is synthesized into the universal. Knowledge is the thesis—the stage of distinction; wisdom is the sublation—the transcendence of distinction toward unity. Man is not called to reject knowledge, but to complete it within wisdom. Karpouzos, in his work The Cosmology of Consciousness, writes: "Wisdom is not the negation of knowledge; it is its liberation from the prison of the anthropocentric ego." This means that wisdom is the point where knowledge is transformed into self-knowledge—where the subject understands that the object of knowledge is not foreign, but a reflection of its own Being. 6. Knowledge and Wisdom in the Age of Technics The information age has highlighted the vast expansion of knowledge and, simultaneously, the lack of wisdom. Man knows almost everything about the world, but less and less about himself. Knowledge has become quantitative, not qualitative. Heidegger speaks of the "state of the oblivion of Being"; Karpouzos would say that modern man suffers from metaphysical anesthesia. The world is treated as a given object, not as a sacred mystery. The solution, therefore, lies not in the rejection of knowledge, but in its transmutation into wisdom—in the creation of a holistic/fragmentary consciousness that unites science with poetry, logic with dreams, reason with the heart. 7. Knowledge — Wisdom as a Unity of Logic and Intuition Knowledge — Wisdom constitutes an existential and epistemological axis of human evolution. Knowledge is the outward journey of the mind, wisdom is the inward return of the spirit. One without the other is incomplete; together they form the complete circular movement of consciousness. Just as Heraclitus saw the unity of opposites and Plato the ascent of the soul toward the Good, so Karpouzos calls us to a new synthesis: "Knowledge is the light that shows the way; wisdom is the love that walks it." In a world where information outweighs meaning, restoring the balance between knowledge and wisdom is perhaps the most urgent task of philosophy—and of humanity. BEYOND THE DISTINCTION OF KNOWLEDGE — WISDOM The Post-Ontological and Post-Philosophical Vision of Alexis Karpouzos 1. From the Knowledge of Distinction to the Wisdom of Unity The history of philosophy is, in a sense, the history of distinction: of the subject from the object, of man from nature, of time from the eternal. Knowledge was constructed upon these distinctions—it is the act by which the mind delineates, classifies, and separates. Wisdom, conversely, has always been the nostalgia for unity: the return of man to the Whole from which he was detached. Alexis Karpouzos, moving beyond classical philosophical tradition, attempts to transcend this dipole. He does not propose the rejection of knowledge in favor of wisdom, nor the absorption of wisdom into knowledge, but the birth of a new mode of consciousness, which he calls post-ontological and post-philosophical. In this new way of thinking, knowledge and wisdom are no longer distinguished—they are two modes of the same being knowing and being. 2. Ontological Transcendence: The Unity of Man and World At the heart of Karpouzos’ thought lies the transcendence of the man–world distinction. Modern philosophy was founded upon the subject, the "knowing self," and the corresponding externality of the world as an object. This distinction—from Descartes to Kant—created an ontology of distance: Being became something to be observed, not something to be participated in. Karpouzos proposes a post-ontology of unity. Being is not an object, nor is man a spectator. The World "is" relationship, energy, participation. Man is not standing over against the world, but within it, as a form of the same cosmic consciousness. Knowledge, then, is no longer representation, but a manifestation of the Whole within consciousness. Wisdom is not a superior state, but the very self-knowledge of the world through man. As he writes: "The world is not outside us; it is our self-expanding into infinite forms." The transcendence of the knowledge–wisdom distinction is, therefore, ontological: there is no longer a knower and a known, but a co-being, a unity where thought is a form of Being itself. 3. Metaphysical Transcendence: From Being to the Becoming of the Whole The contemplative/poetic thought of Karpouzos does not seek a transcendent Being behind phenomena. The Divine, for him, is not "above" the world, but emerges within it, as constant becoming. Knowledge based on fixed ontological categories (being/non-being, matter/spirit) loses its ground because the World is ceaseless creation—a "becoming of Being," not a static entity, but the sum of its transformations. At the metaphysical level, the transcendence of the knowledge–wisdom distinction means that to know and to be coincide. Knowledge is not an interpretation of Being, but participation in the becoming of the Whole. Wisdom, for its part, is not "higher" knowledge, but the consciousness of the transformation of all opposites and contradictions. Karpouzos’ reflection is, therefore, energetic and poetic: the Universe is not a machine, but a poem in motion, where thought is rhythm and not definition. 4. Epistemological Transcendence: From Logic to Consciousness The epistemology of modernity, based on logic, separates the knowing subject from the studied object. In Karpouzos, this distinction loses its basis because the act of knowing is already a manifestation of the Whole within the mind. Knowledge is no longer the possession of information but participation in consciousness. The world is not "represented" in the mind; it is present—that is, it presents itself within it as a form of the World itself, which manifests in multiple forms and kinds. Thus, knowledge is transformed into insight—not intellectual, but conscious. The mind ceases to be a tool and becomes a mirror of cosmic self-knowledge. And wisdom is nothing other than the full clarity of this mirror. This post-epistemological mode of knowledge in Karpouzos takes a poetic form: "Knowledge is consciousness looking at itself through the eyes of the world." 5. Psychological Transcendence: From the Ego to the Consciousness of the Whole The transcendence of knowledge–wisdom presupposes a psychological transformation. The distinction between them reflects the very distinction between ego and world, mind and heart, human and divine. Knowledge, when it belongs to the ego, separates; wisdom, when it belongs to consciousness, unifies. Psychological transcendence is the silence of the ego, not as negation but as openness. When the mind ceases to function as the owner of truth, then knowledge is transformed into wisdom. In Karpouzos’ language, this is the passage from "I think" to "it thinks" or otherwise "I am a thought of the world." Psychology, then, becomes ontology: inner experience is identified with the structure of the universe. Just as the soul is the depth of man, so the universe is the soul of the Whole. Transcendence is, simultaneously, inner and cosmic. 6. The Post-Ontological and Post-Philosophical as the Language of Transcendence Karpouzos calls this thought post-ontological and post-philosophical. This does not mean the abolition of philosophy, but its transmutation into the poetry of consciousness. The language spoken by this thought is no longer analytical or demonstrative; it is symbolic, rhythmic, mythical. It is a poetic logic, where concept and image are interwoven. Post-philosophical thought does not merely "say," but emerges; it does not explain the world, it creates it as word. Language itself becomes the body of the Whole: "Thought does not describe Being; it is Being speaking through thought." Thus, the transcendence of knowledge–wisdom is not an intellectual conclusion, but a poetic act, a rhythm of existence that connects the human with the cosmic. Wisdom as the Self-Knowledge of the Whole The transcendence of the distinction between knowledge and wisdom, in Alexis Karpouzos, signifies the transcendence of every duality: man–world, subject–object, nature–history. Knowledge is no longer a confrontation with the world, but a form of cosmic self-consciousness. Wisdom is not a higher stage, but the consciousness of the Whole knowing itself through us. This thought, post-ontological and post-philosophical, is simultaneously mystical and scientific, poetic and dialectical. It is the language of a new humanism—of a human being who does not seek to dominate the world, but to participate in its creative flow. "There is no knowledge without wisdom, nor wisdom without knowledge. There is only consciousness awakening to the infinite face of the world." /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/40096635

CHINESE THOUGHT AND WESTERN PHILOSOPHY - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 12/27/2025

CHINESE THOUGHT AND WESTERN PHILOSOPHY - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS CHINESE THOUGHT AND WESTERN PHILOSOPHY by Alexis Karpouzos and Ceo of Academia The dialogue between Chinese thought and Western philosophy opens a horizon where two distinct civilizations of meaning encounter one another beyond the limits of cultural comparison. In the work of Alexis Karpouzos, this encounter is not treated as a synthesis imposed from above, but as a living resonance—an exploration of how different modes of thinking illuminate the same fundamental questions of existence, consciousness, and cosmic order. Chinese philosophy, shaped by Daoism, Confucianism, and Buddhism, approaches reality as a dynamic process rather than a fixed structure. It emphasizes harmony, relationality, and the continuous transformation of being. Concepts such as Dao, Qi, Yin and Yang, and Wu Wei articulate a worldview in which opposites interpenetrate and meaning arises through balance rather than domination. Knowledge here is not abstract mastery but attunement to the rhythms of the cosmos. Western philosophy, by contrast, has historically pursued truth through analysis, conceptual distinction, and the assertion of rational autonomy. From Greek metaphysics to modern rationalism and existential inquiry, it has sought to define being, subjectivity, and knowledge through logical clarity and critical reflection. Yet within this tradition lies an unresolved tension: the desire for absolute foundations alongside the recognition of finitude, becoming, and the limits of reason. Alexis Karpouzos approaches these two traditions not as opposites but as complementary expressions of humanity’s philosophical quest. Chinese thought offers a wisdom of immanence, continuity, and non-duality, while Western philosophy provides a language of critique, transcendence, and self-reflection. When brought into dialogue, they reveal hidden correspondences: between Dao and Logos, emptiness and being, intuition and reason, silence and speech. This comparative perspective does not aim to dissolve differences but to deepen understanding. It invites a rethinking of philosophy itself—not as a closed system of doctrines, but as a transformative path that integrates insight, experience, and ethical responsibility. In a world marked by fragmentation and cultural dissonance, the encounter between Chinese thought and Western philosophy becomes a gesture of reconciliation, pointing toward a more holistic vision of knowledge. Through this dialogue, philosophy regains its original vocation: to awaken consciousness, to harmonize thought with life, and to reconnect humanity with the living intelligence of the cosmos. /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/39540900

SACRED AND PROFANE IN MIRCEA ELIADE'S THEORY - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 12/27/2025

SACRED AND PROFANE IN MIRCEA ELIADE'S THEORY - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS Sacred and Profane in Mircea Eliade’s Theory Alexis Karpouzos Mircea Eliade’s distinction between the sacred and the profane constitutes one of the most influential paradigms in the phenomenology of religion. Within this framework, the sacred emerges not merely as a religious category but as a fundamental structure of human consciousness—an ontological mode through which reality is revealed, ordered, and experienced. In contrast, the profane represents the homogeneous, desacralized space of modern existence, characterized by fragmentation, historical contingency, and existential disorientation. In the research perspective of Alexis Karpouzos, Eliade’s theory is approached as a metaphysical anthropology that transcends historical religion and touches the deeper symbolic architecture of being. The sacred, manifested through hierophanies, interrupts profane time and space, revealing a transhistorical dimension where meaning, origin, and cosmic order converge. These manifestations are not symbolic projections but ontological disclosures—events in which Being itself becomes visible to human awareness. Karpouzos emphasizes that Eliade’s sacred is inseparable from the experience of cosmic participation. Sacred space establishes a center—an axis mundi—through which the individual aligns with the structure of the cosmos, while sacred time re-enacts mythical origins, allowing human existence to be regenerated through eternal return. In this sense, the sacred functions as a bridge between finitude and transcendence, history and eternity. Against the background of modernity’s desacralization, this research explores the loss of symbolic consciousness and the eclipse of metaphysical meaning. Yet, following Eliade’s intuition, Karpouzos suggests that the sacred never disappears; it withdraws, disguises itself, and re-emerges in altered forms—through art, philosophy, science, and inner experience. The task of contemporary thought is not to restore archaic religion but to reawaken the latent sacred dimension embedded within human consciousness and the structure of the universe itself. Thus, the sacred–profane polarity is not a rigid dualism but a dynamic tension that defines the human condition. Through Eliade’s vision, reinterpreted in Karpouzos’ cosmological and philosophical horizon, the sacred becomes a call toward ontological awakening—a return to a unified vision of reality where meaning, being, and consciousness are once again inseparable. /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/39540885

ΟΙ ΓΛΩΣΣΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΣΜΟΥ - ΟΙ ΚΟΣΜΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΓΛΩΣΣΑΣ : ΑΛΕΞΗΣ ΚΑΡΠΟΥΖΟΣ 12/23/2025

ΟΙ ΓΛΩΣΣΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΣΜΟΥ - ΟΙ ΚΟΣΜΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΓΛΩΣΣΑΣ : ΑΛΕΞΗΣ ΚΑΡΠΟΥΖΟΣ Εισαγωγή: Η Γλώσσα ως Αρχιτέκτονας της Πραγματικότητας Ομιλητής: CEO της ACADEMIA «Καλησπέρα σας. Σήμερα, στο podcast της ACADEMIA, έχουμε την τιμή να φιλοξενούμε τον Αλέξη Καρπούζο σε μια συζήτηση που υπόσχεται να αλλάξει τον τρόπο που αντιλαμβανόμαστε την καθημερινότητά μας. Για τον Αλέξη Καρπούζο, η γλώσσα δεν είναι ένα "εργαλείο" που απλώς περιγράφει έναν προϋπάρχοντα κόσμο. Αντίθετα, είναι η μήτρα μέσα στην οποία γεννιέται η εμπειρία μας. Στη σκέψη του, οι λέξεις δεν είναι στατικά σύμβολα, αλλά ενεργειακές οντότητες που "κλειδώνουν" ή "ξεκλειδώνουν" επίπεδα αντίληψης. «Οι γλώσσες του κόσμου - οι κόσμοι της γλώσσας» Προλογίζει ο CEO της ACADEMIA «Είναι ιδιαίτερη τιμή για μένα, ως εκπρόσωπος της ACADEMIA, να σας καλωσορίσω στον ψηφιακό χώρο του Αλέξη Καρπούζου. Σήμερα, ξεκινάμε μια σειρά επεισοδίων που δεν αποτελούν απλώς μια ακαδημαϊκή ανάλυση της γλώσσας, αλλά μια υπαρξιακή αναζήτηση της ίδιας μας της ταυτότητας. Η αφετηρία της σκέψης του Αλέξη, όπως αποτυπώνεται ανάγλυφα στο εμβληματικό του έργο «Η Σοφία της Ενότητας», είναι ότι τίποτα στο σύμπαν δεν υπάρχει απομονωμένο. Αυτή η θεμελιώδης διασύνδεση των πάντων βρίσκει την απόλυτη έκφρασή της στη γλώσσα. Για τον Αλέξη, η γλώσσα δεν είναι ένα "εργαλείο" που απλώς περιγράφει έναν κόσμο που βρίσκεται "εκεί έξω". Είναι ο ίδιος ο ιστός που υφαίνει την πραγματικότητά μας. Σε αυτή τη σειρά podcast, "Οι γλώσσες του κόσμου - οι κόσμοι της γλώσσας", ο Αλέξης μας προσκαλεί να δούμε τις λέξεις ως "πύλες". Μέσα από το πρίσμα της "Σοφίας της Ενότητας", εξερευνούμε πώς: Η Γλώσσα ως Οντολογία: Πώς τα όρια της γλώσσας μας καθορίζουν τα όρια του σύμπαντος που μπορούμε να κατοικήσουμε. Η Ποιητική της Ενότητας: Η αναζήτηση μιας γλώσσας που δεν τεμαχίζει την πραγματικότητα σε αντικείμενα, αλλά αναδεικνύει την καθολική διασύνδεση των πάντων. Η Σιωπή πίσω από τις Λέξεις: Η παραδοχή ότι η αληθινή γνώση συχνά βρίσκεται εκεί όπου η γλώσσα σταματά και ξεκινά η άμεση βίωση του Όλου. "Δεν μιλάμε απλώς μια γλώσσα· κατοικούμε μέσα σε αυτήν. Και κάθε νέα γλώσσα, κάθε νέα έννοια που αγκαλιάζουμε, είναι ένας νέος γαλαξίας που γεννιέται στη συνείδησή μας." Η Γλώσσα ως Μήτρα: Πώς οι λέξεις που επιλέγουμε δημιουργούν το σύμπαν μέσα στο οποίο αναπνέουμε. Η Κατάργηση του Διαχωρισμού: Πώς η γλώσσα μπορεί να πάψει να χωρίζει το "εγώ" από το "όλον" και να γίνει η γέφυρα προς την καθολική συνείδηση. Πέρα από το Λεξιλόγιο: Η αναζήτηση της σιωπής και της άμεσης βίωσης που περιγράφεται στα κείμενά του, εκεί όπου η γλώσσα υποκλίνεται μπροστά στο μυστήριο της ύπαρξης. "Δεν κατοικούμε σε σπίτια, κατοικούμε μέσα σε λέξεις. Και όταν αυτές οι λέξεις εμπνέονται από τη Σοφία της Ενότητας, τότε ο κόσμος μας παύει να είναι ένα θραύσμα και γίνεται ένα αδιαίρετο όλον." Σας προσκαλούμε να ακούσετε, να στοχαστείτε και να ανακαλύψετε μαζί μας τους κόσμους που κρύβονται πίσω από κάθε φθόγγο. Αλέξη, σε ευχαριστούμε που μας καθοδηγείς σε αυτό το ταξίδι προς το Φως και την Ενότητα. Ο λόγος σε εσένα.» /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/39515745

UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 12/20/2025

UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS "Welcome to the podcast. In today’s episode, we move beyond the boundaries of traditional dualism to explore one of the most provocative and essential frontiers of modern thought: Universal Consciousness. Our guest today is Alexis Karpouzos, a philosopher and thinker whose work serves as a critical junction for three seemingly disparate worlds: the rigorous mathematics of modern physics, the dialectical history of Western philosophy, and the intuitive depth of Eastern mysticism. Karpouzos challenges the prevailing 'materialist reductionism'—the idea that consciousness is merely a byproduct of neurobiological processes. Instead, he presents an analytical case for consciousness as the fundamental substrate of the universe itself. In his 'Unified Theory of Consciousness,' the separation between the observer and the observed is revealed to be a linguistic illusion—a 'trance of certainty' that we must transcend to understand the nature of existence. In this session, we will dissect: The Non-Locality of Mind: How quantum theory supports the idea that consciousness is not confined to the skull but is a non-local, universal field. The One and the Multiple: The philosophical synthesis of the 'Zero' (the void of Zen) and the 'Infinite' (the absolute of rationalism). Poetic Metaphysics: Why analytical language alone is insufficient to describe reality, and why we need a 'post-ontological' thought to grasp the wholeness of the cosmos. We are not merely inhabitants of the universe; we are the universe experiencing itself through the localized lens of our own awareness. Please join me for a deep analytical dive with Alexis Karpouzos." Key Analytical Pillars of the Episode To provide context for your listeners, here are the three primary arguments Karpouzos uses to support the theme: Quantum Holism: Utilizing the Observer Effect and Quantum Entanglement to argue that the physical world and spiritual experience are two aspects of the same indivisible net of relations. The Dialectics of Unity: Borrowing from Hegel and Heraclitus to show that reality is a dynamic "play" (jeu) of becoming, where opposites like matter and spirit are actually complementary rhythms of a single "Cosmic Thought." Ontological Fluidity: Arguing that our "Self" is not an isolated ego but a "wave" in the universal "ocean"—a localized expression of a collective unconscious. echnical vs. Mystical: Bridging the Divide Concept Technical / Scientific Language Mystical / Intuitive Language Karpouzos' Synthesis The Foundation The Unified Field: The underlying physical field from which all forces and matter emerge. Sunyata / The Void: The "luminous emptiness" that is the source of all existence. The Indivisible Whole: Reality is a single, conscious field that creates the illusion of separate parts. Connection Quantum Entanglement: Particles that remain connected across space; a change in one instantly affects the other. Indra’s Net: An infinite cosmic web where every jewel reflects every other jewel. Universal Relationality: Nothing exists in isolation. Existence is defined by relationship, not by "stuff." The Observer The Measurement Problem: The act of observation collapses the wave function into a particle. The Witness: The "silent seer" within us that is not separate from the world it sees. Participatory Universe: We do not "look at" the world; the world looks at itself through us. Change Entropy & Evolution: The movement from simplicity to complexity and the flow of time. Impermanence (Anicca): The realization that everything is in a constant state of flux. The Dance of Becoming: The universe is not a static object but a "poetic event" that is always unfolding. Discussion Tips for the Podcast Avoid the "Materialist Trap": If the conversation gets too technical (talking only about neurons or particles), ask Alexis: "How does this scientific fact change the way we feel when we look at the stars?" Focus on the "Co-emergence": Karpouzos often emphasizes that "Mind" and "Matter" arise together. A great question would be: "Is matter just slowed-down consciousness, or is consciousness the internal experience of matter?" The "Trance of Certainty": Use this phrase often. It is a signature of his philosophy. It refers to the Western habit of believing our labels (like "tree," "atom," or "me") are the actual reality. /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/39480345

HERMANN HESSE : SELF- UNDERSTANDING AND ENLIGHTENMENT - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 12/20/2025

HERMANN HESSE : SELF- UNDERSTANDING AND ENLIGHTENMENT - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS "Welcome back to the podcast. Today, we embark on a journey through the landscapes of the inner soul, guided by one of the most profound literary voices of the 20th century and the philosophical insights of our guest. We are exploring the theme: Hermann Hesse: Self-Understanding and Enlightenment, featuring the perspectives of thinker and author Alexis Karpouzos. For generations, Hermann Hesse has been the quiet companion of the seeker. From the restless wandering of Knulp and the spiritual awakening of Siddhartha, to the intellectual tensions of The Glass Bead Game and the dark night of the soul in Steppenwolf, Hesse’s work remains a roadmap for those who refuse to live a superficial life. Joining us to unpack these themes is Alexis Karpouzos. Together, we will examine how Hesse’s 'Path of the Interior' aligns with Karpouzos’ own philosophy of universal consciousness. How do we bridge the gap between our 'social selves' and our true essence? Is enlightenment a destination to be reached, or a way of experiencing the 'now'? And how does Hesse’s unique blend of Eastern mysticism and Western psychology speak to the modern search for meaning? Today, we dive into the 'Magic of the Beginning' and the courage required to become who we truly are. Please welcome Alexis Karpouzos." Key Discussion Points for this Episode: To help you prepare for the conversation, here are the core concepts that link Hesse and Karpouzos: The Unity of Opposites: How Hesse uses characters (like Narcissus and Goldmund) to represent the Western tension between the mind and the senses, and how Karpouzos suggests a non-dualistic healing of this split. The "Siddhartha" Archetype: Discussing the importance of individual experience over dogmatic teaching—the idea that wisdom is not communicable, only lived. Polarity and Totality: Exploring Hesse’s belief that life is a constant swing between poles, and enlightenment is the "middle way" or the center of the circle. The Self as a Bridge: How self-understanding is not an act of isolation, but the very door through which we connect to the rest of humanity and the cosmos. Phase 1: The Call to Awakening (The Search) The Path of the Interior: Hesse often wrote that "the way to innocence, to the uncreated, to God, leads not back, but forward." How does this "path of the interior" align with your philosophy of self-understanding? The Illusion of the Social Self: In Steppenwolf, Harry Haller struggles with the many "souls" within him. How do you and Hesse view the "Ego"? Is it a prison we must escape, or a tool we must learn to use? The Tension of Polarity: Hesse’s characters often represent two sides—Spirit vs. Nature, or the Thinker vs. the Artist. Why is it so difficult for the Western mind to find the "Middle Way" that connects these two? Phase 2: Siddhartha and the Nature of Wisdom Knowledge vs. Wisdom: Siddhartha famously says, "Knowledge can be communicated, but not wisdom." If wisdom cannot be taught, what is the role of a philosopher or a spiritual guide in the modern world? The River as a Teacher: The river in Siddhartha symbolizes a reality where past, present, and future coexist—a concept very similar to your "Indivisible Wholeness." How can a person practically learn to "listen" to life as Siddhartha listened to the river? The Necessity of Error: To find himself, Siddhartha had to experience both extreme asceticism and extreme decadence. Does your philosophy suggest that "losing oneself" is a mandatory requirement for "finding oneself"? Phase 3: The Universal Connection (Enlightenment) Enlightenment as an Open Eye: You often speak about the "trance of certainty." Was Hesse’s version of enlightenment about reaching a final state, or was it about a continuous "awakening" to the present moment? The Magic of the Beginning: In his poem Stages, Hesse writes, "In all beginnings dwells a magic force." How can we maintain this "magic" in our lives when we are weighed down by the habits and memories of the past? The Glass Bead Game and Totality: In Hesse's final masterpiece, he dreams of a universal language that connects music, math, and history. Does this represent your vision of a "Unified Field" where all human knowledge finally meets? Phase 4: Closing Thoughts Hesse in the 21st Century: In an era of digital distraction and "surface-level" living, why is Hesse’s call to "Self-Understanding" more urgent now than it was 100 years ago? The Final Step: If someone listening feels trapped in their own "Steppenwolf" moment—isolated and divided—what is the first step toward the "Enlightenment" you and Hesse describe? /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/39480255

ZEN BUDDHISM AND THE WESTERN PHILOSOPHY - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 12/20/2025

ZEN BUDDHISM AND THE WESTERN PHILOSOPHY - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS "Welcome to the podcast. Today, we are stepping into the 'Space Between'—the intersection where the analytical rigor of the West meets the silent, profound depth of the East. Our guide for this journey is Alexis Karpouzos, a Greek-born philosopher and spiritual teacher whose work serves as a bridge between the quantum and the cosmic. Karpouzos invites us to look past the 'trance of certainty' and the artificial divisions of subject and object to rediscover a reality that is an 'indivisible wholeness.' In this episode, we explore the theme of Zen Buddhism and Western Philosophy. Is the 'Emptiness' of Zen the same 'Nothingness' that haunted the existentialists? Can the dialectics of Hegel find a home within the non-duality of the Heart Sutra? And how does modern physics support the ancient intuition that we are not separate from that which we observe? From the paradoxical logic of the Zen koan to the process philosophy of Whitehead, we are diving deep into the evolution of consciousness. Prepare to move beyond the language of separation and enter the poetic vision of a conscious universe. Please welcome to the show, Alexis Karpouzos." Alexis Karpouzos combines Zen Buddhism and Western philosophy by creating a "poetic metaphysics" that bridges the gap between the analytical mind of the West and the intuitive stillness of the East. He argues that both traditions, though using different languages, are pointing toward the same indivisible wholeness.1 Here is how he synthesizes these two worlds: 1. Beyond Nihilism: "Absolute Nothingness"2 In Western philosophy, "nothingness" is often associated with Nihilism—the idea that life has no meaning (Sartre, Nietzsche). Karpouzos reframes this using the Zen concept of Sunyata (Emptiness). The Synthesis: He argues that Zen’s "nothingness" is not a void of meaning but a creative fullness. It is the "zero" from which all possibilities arise. By combining Heidegger’s existential inquiry with Zen’s non-duality, he shows that facing the "void" is actually the path to ultimate freedom and creativity.3 2. The Logic of Paradox Western logic is traditionally linear and binary (A is not B). Karpouzos utilizes the Zen Koan style to break this "trance of certainty."4 The Synthesis: He integrates Quantum Physics (the observer effect) with the Zen realization that the observer and the observed are one. He uses the "logic of being/non-being," where opposites do not negate each other but coexist.5 This mirrors the Western concept of Dialectics but moves beyond a final synthesis into a state of "continuous flow." 3. Being vs. Becoming Western thought has historically focused on Substance (fixed things). Karpouzos aligns with Process Philosophy (like that of Alfred North Whitehead) and the Pre-Socratic philosopher Heraclitus ("Everything flows").6 The Synthesis: He connects the Heraclitean Logos with the Buddhist concept of Impermanence (Anicca). For Karpouzos, there are no static "objects" in the universe—only a dynamic process of "becoming."7 4. Consciousness as the Foundation Karpouzos rejects Materialist Reductionism (the idea that matter creates mind).8 Instead, he leans toward Panpsychism and Advaita Vedanta. The Synthesis: He bridges the Western "Philosophy of Mind" with Eastern "Universal Consciousness." He posits that human consciousness is not an isolated ego (the Western "I") but a localized expression of the Cosmic Whole (the Buddha-nature). Comparison at a Glance Concept Western Perspective (Traditional) Zen/Eastern Perspective Karpouzos’ Synthesis Reality Collection of separate objects. An interconnected web/flow. Relational Holism: Relationships are primary; objects are secondary. The Self The isolated Ego ("I think, therefore I am"). No-self (Anatta). Integral Self: The individual is a "wave" in the "ocean" of consciousness. Logic Binary (True/False). Paradoxical (Koans). Transcendent Logic: Using paradox to reach truths beyond language. Science Describes the "How" (Mechanics). Describes the "Why" (Experience). Unified Vision: Science and Spirituality as two sides of one coin. "The universe is not a collection of separate objects, but a single, dynamic, and indivisible whole in which consciousness and reality are co-emergent."9 — Alexis Karpouzos Key Themes to Mention in the Intro If you'd like to customize the intro further, here are the core concepts Karpouzos focuses on: Universal Consciousness: The idea that consciousness isn't a byproduct of the brain but the foundation of the universe. The Dissolution of Dualism: Moving past "either/or" thinking to "both/and" perspectives (e.g., light as both particle and wave). Process over Static Being: Reality is not a collection of "things" but a continuous flow of "becoming," much like the Buddhist concept of impermanence. Poetic Metaphysics: Using art and symbolic language to describe truths that scientific data alone cannot reach. /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/39480225

A FREE BIRD I WANT TO BE - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 01/31/2025

A UNIVERSAL SONG - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 01/17/2025

A UNIVERSAL SONG - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS Alexis karpouzos holds that is only the mind and the language that divides unity of universal space-time into conceptual parts, while Consciousness remains one unified whole. "I invite people to just remember that the world does not consist of subjects and objects, the "subject" and the "object" are metaphysical abstractions of the single and indivisible Wholeness. Man's finite knowledge separates the Whole into parts and studies fragmentarily the beings. The Universal Wholeness is manifested in multiple forms and each form encapsulates the Wholeness. All beings and things, visible and invisible are interrelated and inseparable, are the same and different forms of open wholeness. You are not separate from that which you are intrinsically a part of, regardless of how distant other things seem to be from you. You are a part of all that appears to you, and they are all a part of you. You affect each other, because you are one another. The possibility of survival, passing through a generous and friendly relationship with the other man, with the other beings, the planet as a whole, the stars and the whole universe. Αs he says, 'We need a post-ontological poetic thought, we need a sense of the unity of life and of humans for the sake of human welfare and for the survival of the planet. We need a sense of unity with the cosmos so that we can connect with Reality. But we also need a sense of individuality, for the sake of our own dignity and independence and of the loving care for others. We need it to appreciate each natural form, each animal and plant, each human person in their uniqueness'. For the Alexis karpouzos, ''The invitation for each of us is to dive into the mystery of our questions and our wondering, and come out of the trance of certainty, the idea that we’re supposed to “know” what to do with this life or have some absolute conclusion or resolution about the many paradoxes and contradictions of our existence. Invite you to soften into your doubts, celebrate your uncertainty, and come to see the beauty - and ultimate safety - in Not Knowing. We know not where the journey leads, nor whether a final destination is even a meaningful concept. The attraction is the inherent thrill of participating in a grand creative endeavor for which participation is its own reward''. /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/34891540

MOTHER EARTH - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS 01/17/2025

MOTHER EARTH - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS Alexis karpouzos holds that is only the mind and the language that divides unity of universal space-time into conceptual parts, while Consciousness remains one unified whole. "I invite people to just remember that the world does not consist of subjects and objects, the "subject" and the "object" are metaphysical abstractions of the single and indivisible Wholeness. Man's finite knowledge separates the Whole into parts and studies fragmentarily the beings. The Universal Wholeness is manifested in multiple forms and each form encapsulates the Wholeness. All beings and things, visible and invisible are interrelated and inseparable, are the same and different forms of open wholeness. You are not separate from that which you are intrinsically a part of, regardless of how distant other things seem to be from you. You are a part of all that appears to you, and they are all a part of you. You affect each other, because you are one another. The possibility of survival, passing through a generous and friendly relationship with the other man, with the other beings, the planet as a whole, the stars and the whole universe. Αs he says, 'We need a post-ontological poetic thought, we need a sense of the unity of life and of humans for the sake of human welfare and for the survival of the planet. We need a sense of unity with the cosmos so that we can connect with Reality. But we also need a sense of individuality, for the sake of our own dignity and independence and of the loving care for others. We need it to appreciate each natural form, each animal and plant, each human person in their uniqueness'. For the Alexis karpouzos, ''The invitation for each of us is to dive into the mystery of our questions and our wondering, and come out of the trance of certainty, the idea that we’re supposed to “know” what to do with this life or have some absolute conclusion or resolution about the many paradoxes and contradictions of our existence. Invite you to soften into your doubts, celebrate your uncertainty, and come to see the beauty - and ultimate safety - in Not Knowing. We know not where the journey leads, nor whether a final destination is even a meaningful concept. The attraction is the inherent thrill of participating in a grand creative endeavor for which participation is its own reward''. /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/34891455

Η ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΗΣ (1) - ΑΛΕΞΗΣ ΚΑΡΠΟΥΖΟΣ 12/27/2024

Η ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΗΣ (1) - ΑΛΕΞΗΣ ΚΑΡΠΟΥΖΟΣ (born April 09, 1967, city, ) is an Greek-born and . His work focuses mainly on creating an "universal theory of " in which the insights of eastern and , the Hegel’s dialectical ontology, the post-philosophical thought of , , , , r, also the and the higher come together to form a coherent picture of the . One of the key research directions of Alexis Karpouzos is his exploration of the nature of consciousness. He argues that consciousness is not just a byproduct of the brain but a fundamental aspect of the universe. This view challenges the traditional materialist perspective and has sparked debates among philosophers and scientists. Karpouzos believes that consciousness plays a crucial role in shaping reality and that understanding consciousness is essential for understanding the nature of existence. Another significant research direction of Karpouzos is his work on the relationship between mind and matter. He proposes that mind and matter are not separate entities but interconnected aspects of a unified reality. This perspective draws on ideas from quantum mechanics and Eastern philosophy, suggesting that the mind and the physical world are deeply intertwined. Karpouzos' views on this topic have been both praised and criticized, with some seeing his ideas as groundbreaking and others viewing them as speculative. Karpouzos is also known for his controversial views on the nature of reality. He argues that reality is not fixed and objective but is shaped by our perceptions and consciousness. This view challenges the traditional scientific understanding of reality and has led to debates about the nature of truth and objectivity. Karpouzos' ideas have been met with skepticism by some scientists and philosophers, who argue that his views are too subjective and lack empirical support. Despite the controversies surrounding his work, Alexis Karpouzos continues to be a prominent figure in the fields of philosophy and consciousness studies. His research directions and ideas have sparked important discussions and debates, pushing the boundaries of traditional scientific and philosophical thought. /episode/index/show/alexiskarpouzos/id/34629850