Flashlights

My personal Substack

Catalysts of Change: AI, Crises, Women and Trump | Jacob Nordangård 04/13/2026

Catalysts of Change: AI, Crises, Women and Trump | Jacob Nordangård "We have this old order, that's the old system that came into existence after the Second World War. And now we will crash it so that we can install the new system in the end.” Jacob Nordangård This is the second part of my interview with Jacob Nordangård about the just released English edition of his book “The Digital World Brain.” CHAPTERS 00:05 Fear and Crisis as Tools for Global Transformation 01:38 Politicians Are Obsolete: The AI God and the New System 03:15 The Elite Hierarchy and the Pact With the Devil 04:19 Controlling Youth and Speaking for Unborn Generations 05:56 Manufacturing Emergencies: Their Bread and Butter 08:14 The Global Emergency Platform and Automated Crisis Response 12:17 Unleashing Simultaneous Crises to Force Reform 13:01 Trump: Crashing the Old World Order 14:24 The Great Transition Initiative and the General Emergency 15:54 Transhumanism, the World Future Society, and Perfecting Humans 17:11 The Millennium Project: Rewriting Human Rights for Cyborgs and AI 18:59 Women as Pawns: The Fifth Commitment in Our Common Agenda 20:42 Female Psychopathy and the Anti-Human Agenda 26:53 Sweden’s Feminist Foreign Policy and Its NATO Contradiction 31:11 WEF Young Global Leaders: The Feminization of Power 33:54 Peter Thiel and the Antichrist Lectures in Rome 35:25 Who Is the Antichrist? Thiel’s War on AI Regulation 37:10 Deception, False Gods, and the Digital Control System 38:52 Thiel Inside the Machine: Bilderberg, Rockefeller, Kissinger 40:55 The American Friends of Bilderberg and the Superclass 42:43 Thiel’s Self-Contradiction: Naming the Beast He Builds 44:36 Factions and Rifts: Stable Coins vs. Sustainability 45:56 Trump, Energy Deregulation, and the Data Center Buildout 48:18 What Can People Do? Awareness, Non-Compliance, Resistance 53:23 Use Cash, Refuse the Real ID, Don’t Comply 54:01 Havel’s Power of the Powerless: Living Without Lies 55:28 Never Forget: The Elites Are Just Morons RESOURCES To buy Nordangård’s book: His Substack: /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/40821585

The Transnational Elite's Cure for Earth's “Bad Case of Homo Sapiens” | Jacob Nordangård 04/06/2026

The Transnational Elite's Cure for Earth's “Bad Case of Homo Sapiens” | Jacob Nordangård "They don't need a man like Epstein anymore because they will have a digital world brain that will know everything about everyone." Jacob Nordangård https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/what-the-transnational-elite-is-doing?utm_source=youtube This is the first part of my interview with Jacob Nordangård about the just released English edition of his book “The Digital World Brain.” Nordangård presents a plethora of evidence that the transnational elite is building a global AI-driven governance system via their proxies United Nations, the World Economic Forum, UN member states and and a myriad of other entities. The digital world brain runs on data. The more information it has, the better it can control people. Look at, for example, the Trump administration’s Stargate project: its purpose is to build the infrastructure for an enormous digital control system that will eventually contain and run on massive amounts of data. And that’s why thousands of new data centers are built in America right now. CHAPTERS 0:03:07 Andre Hoffmann and the Transnational Elite 0:07:11 Elites’ View of Humanity: “Bad Case of Homo Sapiens” 0:09:09 What Is the Digital World Brain? Data, AI, Control 0:14:07 Trump, Operation Warp Speed, and System Reset 0:15:34 Putin, Xi, BRICS, and the Pact for the Future 0:18:55 UN, Global Conflicts, and a Shared Control Agenda 0:25:24 The 12 Commitments of “Our Common Agenda” 0:28:11 UN–WEF Partnership, Epstein, and Rockefeller Links 0:35:19 “Our Common Agenda” Website and Guterres’ “Vision” 0:39:53 Pandemic as Trigger to Upgrade Global Governance 0:49:03 “Leave No One Behind” and “Protect Our Planet” 0:52:56 “Build Trust,” Infodemics, and Censoring Dissent 0:58:04 “We Own the Science”: UN Partners with Google 1:01:02 Global Digital Compact and Total Digitization 1:06:26 Every Action Counts: Social Credit and Behavior Control 1:07:06 Nudging, Sludging, and Phasing Out Cash 1:12:29 CBDCs, Stablecoins, and Programmable Money 1:17:06 Net Zero Finance and Capital Flow Enforcement 1:20:26 From Nation-States to Regions and a Borderless Elite RESOURCES Here you can get Nordangård’s book: https://pharosmedia.se/shop#!/english /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/40741010

Inside California’s Department of Public Health During the Pandemic: How One Man Spoke Truth to Power | Ronald F. Owens 03/29/2026

Inside California’s Department of Public Health During the Pandemic: How One Man Spoke Truth to Power | Ronald F. Owens “Before I clicked send, I looked up & said: “Lord, what are they going to do to me when I send them this email?” And I felt the Lord speak into my spirit: “What am I going to do to you if you don't?” *** When Covid hit, Ronald F. Owens Jr. worked for California’s Department of Public Health (CDPH) as a so-called Information Officer 2. His job was to handle media requests related to programs like the Center for Environmental Health, the Center for Family Health and Health Equity. He resigned from CDPH at the end of 2023. In 2024, he published the book “Muzzled Truth: How The California Department of Public Health Rejected COVID-19 Treatment and Vaccine Health Risks Warnings.” Owens Recommends the Use of Ivermectin to His Bosses at CDPH In October 2021, Owens received an internal CDPH email asking him to review a draft website created to warn Californians about the “misuse” of ivermectin in treating COVID-19. Rather than rubber-stamping the draft, Owens spent five days researching the topic, consulting knowledgeable friends and drawing on testimony by Dr. Pierre Kory, who successfully treated over 8,000 COVID patients with ivermectin. Owens then sent his carefully crafted email to senior leadership at California’s Department of Public Health, arguing that properly dosed ivermectin should be regarded and endorsed as a viable treatment option for Californians. His bosses at CDPH were displeased - that was not at all the kind of answer they had expected. Owens was told that his opinion was not relevant since he wasn’t a physician. In addition, he was told that it’s the FDA that makes treatment decisions, not CDPH. And lastly he was told that he should never again include senior leadership in such emails. You wonder why they asked him to comment on the website draft in the first place. Apparently, all they wanted from him was to go along and applaud the website draft about the “misuse” of Ivermectin. That clearly was what those further up expected from employees at California’s Department of Public Health. If California’s Department of Health Had Endorsed Ivermectin as Treatment Option… Imagine for a moment what the effect had been if CDPH had endorsed the use of ivermectin to treat Covid-19. Given California’s 40 million residents and CDPH’s outsized influence among America’s state health departments, a single honest press release about ivermectin would have sent shockwaves across the entire country and could have saved countless lives. Would CDPH have been within its rights to endorse ivermectin despite the fact that the CDC didn’t? Yes. Just look at how CDPH defied the new Covid-19 recommendations issued by the FDA and CDC last year and how it continued to recommend regular Covid booster shots for everyone above the age of 6 months. Unfortunately, on March 16, District Court Judge Brian Murphy of Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction that rolled back all of RFK Jr.’s vaccine policy changes - including the changed Covid-19 injection recommendations. Owens Alerts the CDPH about the Death Toll of the Covid Shots In April 2022, Owens came across a quote from then HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra at a White House “Convening on Equity,” in which Becerra appeared to say that COVID-19 shots were “killing people of color… at about two times the rate of white Americans.” Owens also reviewed VAERS data showing 26,976 deaths across the U.S. attributed to COVID-19 vaccines at that time. On April 18, 2022, he sent another email to his bosses at California’s Department of Public Health alerting them to the horrific death toll of the Covid-19 shots as well as the many serious injuries like strokes, seizures, and heart attacks. Again, management dismissed his concerns. When Owens persisted with his warnings, they issued him a formal counseling memorandum warning him to stop. CDPH Orders Owens to End his Thoughtcrimes The counseling memorandum Owens received was rather Orwellian in nature. He was ordered to correct his wrongthink without delay: “This memo is further intended to direct you in immediately correcting this concern.” “This concern” was Owen’s concern about the almost 30,000 deaths as well as the huge number of serious injuries doctors and nurses had recorded in VAERS as caused by the Covid shots. By then he knew for sure that he was going to face disciplinary measures. Sooner or later his superiors would dock his pay. He also knew that CDPH would never take his warnings and recommendations seriously. That is why he decided to retire at the end of 2023, years earlier than he would have otherwise. Alerting All 58 California’s Boards of Supervisors of Covid Shot Deaths and Injuries After retirement, Owens decided he needed to notify all of California’s 58 county governments of the many deaths and injuries the Covid-19 shots caused in California. Why? The plan is to deny county supervisors plausible deniability regarding the immense harms the injections cause. Without plausible deniability, Californian supervisors can be held legally responsible at some point for not having done anything to stop the shots. He told me: “The California Department of Public Health has a partnership with the counties and I’m performing my public information officer role by informing the counties about the danger of the COVID-19 vaccine. When I finish what I’m doing, every county, all 58 counties will have three written notifications: one from July 2024, and one from December 2024. At the time that I appear [before a Board of Supervisors], I follow up by sending them a third email… So each county will have three written notifications and one in-person appearance per county. I’m providing documentation for somebody in the future to hold these public officials accountable legally.” When I interviewed him, he had already spoken in front of 51 Boards of Supervisors and was getting ready for a long trip on his motorbike to speak in front of the 52nd one. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Ronald’s CDPH Role and Book 0:05:39 CDPH Growth and Clout 0:13:10 Budget, Scale, and Reach 0:15:01 Website Image and DEI 0:19:15 Measles vs Vaccine Deaths 0:22:39 State vs Federal Power 0:37:02 The Ivermectin Email 0:51:39 Inside CDPH During COVID 1:06:20 Ronald’s Vaccine Warning Email 1:17:51 Becerra’s “Equity” Remarks 1:25:20 Hospital Protocols and Harm 1:36:20 County Board “Odyssey” 1:53:25 Retirement and Ongoing Mission RESOURCES /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/40654695

Behind the Scenes at a Covid-19 Mass Vaccination Center in California | Julie Threet 03/20/2026

Behind the Scenes at a Covid-19 Mass Vaccination Center in California | Julie Threet “I witnessed 43,000 people get shot with poison… It weighs heavy on my heart but it fuels me.” —Julie Threet https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/when-bla-licensure-becomes-a-deadly Throughout 2021, Julie Threet worked as a volunteer at the largest mass vaccination center in the city of Chico in Butte County, California. She was fired at the beginning of January 2022 because she refused to receive a booster shot. In our interview, she describes in detail the center’s daily operations and how she turned from trusting the shots to fearing them to tirelessly advocating for their removal from the market. Until today, Julie has warned about the injections over a hundred times in front of 33 different Californian County Boards of Supervisors. CHAPTERS 0:01:08 Setting the Scene: Life in Butte County, California and Julie’s Move to Chico 0:01:48 Julie’s Background: From Silicon Valley HR Executive to Chico Community Activist 0:04:39 Early Local Activism: Fighting Syringe Distribution in Chico Parks 0:05:54 Character of Butte County: Rural Economy, Disasters, and Community Response 0:07:46 Volunteering at Enloe Medical Center: Role as Patient Ambassador 0:09:05 Enloe as Largest Employer: Comparison with White Plains Hospital and Local Economies 0:10:07 Enloe’s History, Foundation, Political Ties, and Influence in Butte County 0:14:48 Volunteers and Covid: Being Sent Home and Inconsistencies in Risk Logic 0:18:42 Arrival of Covid Vaccines and Creation of Mass Vaccination Clinics in Chico 0:23:35 Inside the Draw Room: Storage, Thawing Protocols, and Handling of Moderna Vials 0:31:56 Time, Temperature, and Potential Degradation of Vaccine Doses 0:35:00 Julie’s Own Moderna Shots: Arm Reactions, Brain Fog, and Discovery of Brain Lesion 0:40:19 Neurologist Visit, Microangiopathy Diagnosis, and Lack of Linkage to Vaccines 0:42:51 The Whiteboard System: Lot Numbers, Daily Dose Targets, and Throughput Tracking 0:47:38 Appointment System, Age/Occupation Tiers, and Daily Volume per Clinic Day 0:48:43 Funding and Incentives: State Money, Brewery Donations, and Becerra’s Grants 0:50:00 Early Manual Data Entry: Paper Forms, Missing Records, and Error Potential 0:53:24 Transition to Tablets: Capturing Dose Details and Lot Numbers Digitally 0:55:47 California’s Immunization Registry and Digital Vaccine IDs 1:00:00 State and Federal Data Flows: How Vaccination Statistics Are Built and Used 1:02:53 Comparing Butte vs Santa Clara: Vaccination Rates and Covid Case/Death Rates 1:05:22 Countywide Lot Tracking: FOIA Data on Doses per Lot in Butte County 1:08:05 Manufacturing and Distribution Patterns: Fragmented Lots and Concealment of Harm 1:10:00 Moderna Lot Recall in California and Butte County’s Failure to Notify Recipients 1:12:16 Political, Financial, and Institutional Pressures in Butte County Public Health 1:15:23 Conservative Politics, Medical Establishment Power, and Captured Officials 1:18:54 Weekly Testing Pavilion: Segregating Unvaccinated Staff 1:32:00 Mass-Vaccination Floor Layout: Nurse Stations, Patient Flow, and “Disneyland Line” /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/40564115

When BLA Licensure Becomes a Deadly Joke: Absurdities of Moderna’s Nonclinical Spikevax Studies | Sasha Latypova 03/08/2026

When BLA Licensure Becomes a Deadly Joke: Absurdities of Moderna’s Nonclinical Spikevax Studies | Sasha Latypova "This evidence, it was like a light bulb for me when I saw this transcript." —Sasha Latypova This is the third, the last and, I believe, the most revealing part of my interview with Sasha Latypova about CHD’s Citizen Petition to revoke BLA status from Pfizer’s and Moderna’s Covid-19 shots. *** What Was the Purpose of Submitting All These Nonsensical Studies? The purpose, Latypova says, was to “just produce a pile of paper to say, ‘we did a lot of things and yeah, maybe it’s not totally complete, but it’s mostly good.’” It was all for show. The goal was to get the toxic Covid-19 shots into the bodies of hundreds of millions of Americans without any accountability from manufacturers and federal agencies. To reach that goal, the federal government, in collaboration with the pharmaceutical industry, media and big tech, stripped citizens of their civil rights, lied blatantly to the public, deceived the public and forced millions of Americans to be injected. The studies shown are just a few examples among many. In its Citizen Petition, Children’s Health Defense goes over lots of other such studies that show no compliance whatsoever with biologic licensing standards. BLA approval was granted to Moderna (and also to Pfizer) on the basis of piles of paper that really were piles of sh*t. Misbranding is way too nice a word for this crime. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 FDA–Operation Warp Speed meeting and shift to EUA pathway 0:02:52 IND filings, non‑investigational “countermeasures” route, “magic leap” 0:05:20 Legal meaning of IND and investigational status 0:08:28 Introduction to Moderna’s nonclinical program: Judicial Watch FOIA records 0:09:54 Non‑GLP pharmacology studies and NIH involvement 0:11:34 Flawed biodistribution study: wrong product, non‑GLP, male‑only rats 0:15:52 Toxicology with non‑representative mRNAs 0:18:21 Systemic BLA non‑compliance and objectives of the citizen petition 0:21:07 PREP Act as governing law & misbranding argument 0:26:23 Informed consent, PREP Act, RFK Jr’s role & doctors’ ethical dilemma /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/40358200

Does Shedding Kill? Correlations Between Injected Teens and Adult Female Mortality | Hervé Seligmann 03/01/2026

Does Shedding Kill? Correlations Between Injected Teens and Adult Female Mortality | Hervé Seligmann “What you see is the more children 10 to 14 were injected, the more women died of cancers overall in 2021 compared to the previous year.” Hervé Seligmann This is my second interview with biologist Dr. Hervé Seligmann. He has held academic positions at Aix-Marseille University, University of Oslo, Louisiana State University, the University of Chicago, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. *** Strong Positive Correlations between Teenage Vaccination Rates and Increased Death Rates in Adult Females About a year ago, Seligmann discovered the University of Washington’s Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx). This database, maintained by the University’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), contains the world’s most comprehensive health and demographic data from 1980 to the present. Seligmann said: “For around 200 countries and around 200 or more diseases, they give you the death rates and the yearly incidences of all of these diseases for each country and also by sex and by age classes.” When Seligmann discovered this rich data depository in early spring 2025, data were available only until 2021. He found that strange but was nonetheless happy to have at least data for 2020 and 2021. He downloaded the death rates for 2020 and 2021 from 26 countries for about 60 types of diseases - cancers as well as cardiovascular, neurological and gastroenterological diseases - and he also downloaded the injection rates cumulated over the previous month up to mid 2021 for each of the age classes provided. Then he checked for correlations and found strong positive ones between teenage vaccination rates, in particular for ages 10 to 14, and increased death rates from almost all cancer and disease types in adult females - with virtually no such correlation in adult males. CHAPTERS 0:00:04 – Intro and Herve Seligmann’s background 0:02:30 – Using GHDx global health data 0:07:59 – Teen injections vs spike in female cancer deaths (2021) 0:11:30 – Interpreting the female-only signal and shedding hypothesis 0:22:30 – Data for 2020–2021 changes between spring and autumn 2025 0:27:35 – Can these updated datasets still be trusted? 0:39:56 – 2022–2023: shifting from shedding to direct injection effects 0:45:22 – “Priming” idea: injections heighten response to later shedding 0:51:31 – Ongoing boosters in older people vs dropping uptake in teens 1:07:26 – Organ-specific cancer deaths vs Pfizer biodistribution data 1:19:40 – Summary: vaccines as main driver, mechanisms remain complex RESOURCES /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/40269830

How the FDA Lied to the American People About Covid-19 ‘Clinical Trials’ | Sasha Latypova 02/22/2026

How the FDA Lied to the American People About Covid-19 ‘Clinical Trials’ | Sasha Latypova "Vaccines can reach the arms of Americans under investigational or non-investigational pathways that are separate and distinct." —Citizen Petition Regarding Covid-19 Vaccine Licensure https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/how-the-fda-lied-to-the-american?utm_source=youtube This is the second part of my interview with Sasha Latypova in which we discuss the petition’s arguments in detail. The petition was filed in December 2025 by Children’s Health Defense to request that the FDA revoke the Biologics License Application approvals (BLAs) for the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 shots. Latypova wrote extensive parts of the petition. THE PETITION'S CORE LEGAL ARGUMENT Products developed under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) cannot simply be granted Biologics License Applications (BLAs). It’s like declaring sewage to be water. But the FDA retroactively granted Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA Covid-19 vaccines full BLA approval they never legally earned. Therefore, the citizen petition argues, these products have been misbranded. Misbranding is not a minor infraction, Sasha Latypova told me, but a federal crime that can trigger seizure, injunction, criminal penalties, and license revocation. WHY IS MISBRANDING SUCH A BIG DEAL? It’s a long and difficult process to obtain BLA approval from the FDA. Under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act, FDA may approve a BLA only if the vaccine is shown to be safe, pure, and potent for its intended use. In addition, it must be manufactured in facilities that consistently meet regulatory standards. Usually, it takes many years to obtain BLA approval. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Citizen Petition Overview and Claim of Vaccine Misbranding 0:01:38 FDA’s Original Mandate: Misbranding, Adulteration, Interstate Commerce 0:02:35 Federal vs State Authority and Possibility of State‑Level Divergence 0:05:04 Misbranding as a Serious Federal Crime and FDA’s Dormant Powers 0:05:36 Investigational vs Non‑Investigational (EUA) Pathways 0:09:02 PREP Act Origins and Congressional Justification for EUA Countermeasures 0:13:08 No True Clinical Trials: EUA Products and “The Trial Charade” 0:14:46 Brooke Jackson’s Case 0:22:59 Media Framing: “Technicalities” vs Binding Law on Labeling and Pathways 0:27:39 Core Demands of the Petition: Revoke BLAs, Re‑Designate as EUA Products 0:29:43 Informed Consent, Nuremberg Legacy, and the Missing IRB Oversight 0:32:45 EUA Products Cannot Be Mandated – Yet Mandates Were Imposed Anyway 0:34:53 EUA Suspends FDCA Safeguards: cGMP Deviations and Non‑Regulation 0:39:56 Expiration Date Extensions and the 2069 Pfizer Lot Anomaly 0:48:46 Comparing BLA Standards vs EUA: Safety, Purity, Potency, Sterility, Identity 0:54:31 Manufacturing Process Validation and Extreme Lot‑to‑Lot Variability 1:05:30 Petition’s Legal Conclusion on FDA Violations /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/40187710

Deadly Chain of Command: From Federal Bureaucrats to Hospital CFOs to Doctors | Ken McCarthy 02/15/2026

Deadly Chain of Command: From Federal Bureaucrats to Hospital CFOs to Doctors | Ken McCarthy “When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers, we are not simply protecting their trivial old age. We are thereby ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations.” —Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago For the entire post, click here: https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/deadly-chain-of-command-from-federal Few Americans Know About the Extent of Medical Murders During Covid This is the third and last part of my interview with Ken McCarthy, author of ‘What the Nurses Saw - An Investigation Into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospitals During the COVID Panic.’ It’s almost exactly six years since the start of the Covid-19 Pandemic. But way too few people in America know about the extent of the systemic medical murders that the nurses saw. His book, McCarthy told me, is a witness to the crimes that happened during the Pandemic: “If you witness a crime, if you witness somebody being abused, you’re sort of obligated as a human being to try to interfere or at a minimum report it to somebody who can intervene and help. So that’s the function of this book. It exists. People do read it. It’s slowly moving its way through the world. And I hope more and more people become aware of it, become aware of the stories so that they can protect themselves.” Medicine’s Return to the Middle Ages McCarthy is convinced that medicine is firmly back in the Middle Ages. Back then, he said, there were “a lot of insane medical practices and they were validated or authorized by the ultimate authority, which happened to be the Catholic Church… We are literally back to where medicine is being authorized and promulgated [by an entity] that has nothing to do with medicine, has nothing to do with science, has nothing to do with public health. It is simply a directive from the most powerful forces in the society, which now are the federal governments.” Remdesivir Approved for Prematurely Born Babies Remdesivir, one of Fauci’s pet drugs, is a good example of such insane practices not rooted in science. Nurses nicknamed Remdesivir ‘Run! Death Is Near.’ The drug, which is known for its extreme toxicity - it leads to kidney failure among a host of other adverse events - received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in April 2020, followed by FDA approval in October 2020 but limited to children older than eleven years. One month later, in November 2020, the WHO advised against the use of Remdesivir for Covid-19 patients. The drug was subsequently discontinued in Europe. But not in America. Not to this day. In the United States, the drug remained under Emergency Use Authorization for children younger than 12 until spring 2022 when it received FDA approval for pediatric use for all children older than 27 days. Yes, you read that right: days. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Remdesivir’s EUA and FDA approval 0:01:30 Remdesivir for Premature Babies 0:03:14 Profits, Fauci, and federal drug royalties 0:05:27 Veklury patient marketing 0:07:22 Modern medieval medicine 0:09:19 Federal protocols & the hospital chain of command 0:13:28 Whistleblower nurses, firings, and blacklisting 0:17:57 The need for medical advocates 0:22:13 Nurse–doctor hierarchy and lost collaboration /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/40113990

More than 250,000 Excess Renal Failure Deaths Since 2020 | John Beaudoin 02/11/2026

Peter Thiel’s ‘House Philosopher’ Proposes 'Humane Alternative to Genocide' | Patrick Wood 02/05/2026

Peter Thiel’s ‘House Philosopher’ Proposes 'Humane Alternative to Genocide' | Patrick Wood "The ideal solution achieves the same result as mass murder (the removal of undesirable elements from society), but without any of the moral stigma." —Curtis Yarvin, 2008 https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/peter-thiels-house-philosopher-proposed?utm_source=youtube “Our goal, in short, is a humane alternative to genocide. That is: the ideal solution achieves the same result as mass murder (the removal of undesirable elements from society), but without any of the moral stigma. Perfection cannot be achieved on both these counts, but we can get closer than most might think. The best humane alternative to genocide I can think of is not to liquidate the wards — either metaphorically or literally — but to virtualize them. A virtualized human is in permanent solitary confinement, waxed like a bee larva into a cell which is sealed except for emergencies. This would drive him insane, except that the cell contains an immersive virtual-reality interface which allows him to experience a rich, fulfilling life in a completely imaginary world.” —Curtis Yarvin, 2008 YARVIN's VISION Why, I asked Patrick Wood during our interview about his latest book ‘The Final Betrayal: How Technocracy Destroyed America’’, would anyone care what Curtis Yarvin thinks? Turns out we should care a lot since Peter Thiel regards Yarvin as his ‘House Philosopher.’ And Thiel is not the only one among the billionaire technocrats who has taken a liking to the philosophy of Dark Enlightenment. But does Thiel share Yarvin’s vision of a ‘humane alternative to genocide’? Maybe. It certainly doesn’t bode well that NYT podcaster Ross Douthat had to ask him three times during an interview last year if Thiel wanted humanity to continue. H e got only silence as response until, when asked with much urgency, for a third time, Thiel relented with a ‘Yes, but…’ The ‘but’ was: let them survive - but not without some desperately needed technical enhancements inside their bodies and brains. CHAPTERS 0:00:04 – Intro, Curtis Yarvin “Humane Alternative to Genocide” Passage 0:01:41 – Who Is Curtis Yarvin? Dark Enlightenment and Silicon Valley Influence 0:08:56 – Peter Thiel’s Role: Funding Yarvin, Technocracy, and Monopoly Mindset 0:14:03 – Post‑9/11 Surveillance, Total Information Awareness, and Birth of Palantir 0:17:40 – Democracy vs Freedom? Thiel, Yarvin, and Technocratic Alternatives 0:23:17 – “You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy”: Virtual Bubbles and WEF‑Style Dystopia 0:30:15 – Monarch CEO, Sovereign Corporations, and the End of Private Property 0:32:48 – AI as De Facto Ruler: Centralized Data, Palantir, and Weaponized Governance 0:43:53 – Bilderberg Power: Thiel, Karp, AI Agendas, and Choosing Leaders 0:46:13 – Technocracy as an Economic System: Eliminating Politics and Politicians 0:50:43 – Trump, Technocrats in DC, and Yarvin’s RAGE Doctrine (Retire All Government Employees) 0:54:22 – Marxism, Bolshevism, Nazi Germany, China: Historical Roots of Technocratic Control 1:02:11 – AI as New Religion: AI God, Thiel’s Antichrist Lectures, and Inverted Theology 1:06:40 – Data Centers, Compute, and Building a Global AI Control Infrastructure 1:18:13 – Why Harvest All This Data? From Wearables and Smartphones to Total Control 1:21:32 – Politicians Behind the Curve and AI’s Rapid Capture of Government 1:26:29 – Will the AI Bubble Burst? Societal Strain vs Oligarchs’ Race to Finish 1:32:44 – COVID‑19, Lack of Accountability, and the Illusion of Rights in a Technocratic Order RESOURCES Patrick Wood: The Final Betrayal: How Technocracy Destroyed America https://www.amazon.com/Final-Betrayal-Technocracy-Destroyed-America/dp/B0GD2LCBSB/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&sr=1-1 Patrick Wood’s Technocracy News: https://www.technocracy.news/ Nick Land: The Dark Enlightenment https://www.amazon.com/Dark-Enlightenment-Imperium-Press/dp/192260268X/ref=sr_1_1?sr=8-1 Curtis Yarvin/Mencius Moldbug: Patchwork: A Political System for the 21st Century https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2008/11/patchwork-2-profit-strategies-for-our/ /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/40001885

FDA’s fraudulent BLA Approval of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s Covid Shots | Sasha Latypova 01/29/2026

FDA’s fraudulent BLA Approval of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s Covid Shots | Sasha Latypova Imagine the following: you wake up one morning to the news that the federal government declared sewage to be in compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/fdas-fraudulent-bla-approval-of-pfizers?utm_source=youtube *** It’s all pretty confusing with these toxic mRNA Covid shots. At first they were under Emergency Use Authorization, then the FDA gave them BLA approval but continued to give the EUA shots for more than a year after BLA approval to most Americans. And what role does the PREP act play in all this? To quickly understand the basic concept of the BLA approval game that the FDA has played, imagine the following: you wake up one morning to the news that the federal government declared sewage to be in compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). And the EPA has confirmed that sewage complies with the agency’s established health-based standards for contaminants in public drinking water. You turn on your faucet. And, sure enough, sewage comes flowing out of it. If you decided to drink it, you wouldn’t be able to sue the government when you get sick because sewage has been declared a medical countermeasure under the protection of the PREP act, granting freedom of liability to all municipalities, waterworks etc. in the entire country. This analogy only goes so far though: after all, before the government declared sewage to be compliant with the Safe Drinking Water Act, it didn’t put sewage under some kind of Emergency Use Authorization and it didn’t mandate you to drink it in order to keep your job. PS: This analogy is only meant to highlight the difference in regulatory pathways between EUA authorized and BLA licensed biologics. That’s all. Because the BLA Covid shots are as toxic as the EUA shots. They served us sewage from the start. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 CHD’s Citizen Petition To Revoke Pfizer And Moderna BLAs 0:05:07 Public Response And Record Comment Numbers 0:11:06 What Are Biologics? Basic FDA Categories 0:15:18 From Traditional Biologics To mRNA “Biologics” 0:21:52 NDA vs BLA And Biologics Carve‑outs 0:27:49 Biologics, Vaccines, And Industry Incentives 0:31:19 Growth Of Biologic Drugs And Vaccine Focus 0:31:41 EUA Timeline And 2021 BLA Approvals 0:33:45 Comirnaty Rollout In US vs Europe And Relabeling Claims 0:36:15 Confusion Among Public And Doctors About EUA vs BLA 0:37:28 FOIA Delays And EUA vs EAU Confusion 0:39:40 EUA As Countermeasure Outside Normal FDA Rules 0:43:42 Sewage vs Drinking Water Analogy For EUA vs BLA RESOURCES CHD’s Citizen Petition: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/FDA-2025-P-6831-0001_attachment_1.pdf Tell the FDA to Revoke Licenses on COVID Vaccines: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community/tell-the-fda-to-revoke-licenses-on-covid-vaccines/ Sasha Latypova Breaking: Citizen Petition to the FDA filed by Children’s Health Defense with my input. https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/breaking-citizen-petition-to-the Biologics License Applications (BLA) Process (CBER): https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/development-approval-process-cber/biologics-license-applications-bla-process-cber /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39922960

Vanished Study Finds Synthetic mRNA from the Pfizer Shots in Placentas of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Women | Tom Haviland 01/25/2026

How America & Europe Manipulate Child Excess Mortality: Hervé Seligmann 01/20/2026

“When you kill over a million people in a hospital system, maybe that should be news.” | Ken McCarthy 01/15/2026

“When you kill over a million people in a hospital system, maybe that should be news.” | Ken McCarthy The System That Made the Hospital Murders Possible and Declared Them Covid Deaths Is Still in Place Today. This is the second part of my interview with Ken McCarthy, author of the book ‘What the Nurses Saw: An Investigation Into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospitals During the COVID Panic.’ is the first part. One thing that people should definitely take away from the Covid ‘pandemic’ is that governments should never be in charge of healthcare because this provides them with a potential tool of democide. A lavish incentive structure was created by the U.S. federal health agencies to boost Covid diagnoses and ensure that hospitals would follow the NIH issued treatment protocols which almost always ended in death. For his book ‘What the Nurses Saw,’ Ken did an in-depth interview with AJ DePriest who researched the treatment protocols’ money trail. DePriest found that hospitals in all 50 states received massive payments for every single patient who was admitted to the hospital as a Covid case. No wonder, they’d run the PCR tests over and over again until they got a positive result. What’s interesting is that the payout amount for hospital Covid cases varied dramatically from state to state with West Virginia leading them all with almost half a million of dollars paid to hospitals for each admitted case. CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Hospital COVID Payment Disparities Across States 0:01:25 Additional Financial Incentives and State Differences 0:02:30 Incentives for Admitting Medicaid and Medicare Patients 0:04:06 Socioeconomic Factors, High-Cost Patients, and Targeting 0:08:24 Emergency Use Authorization for COVID-19 Tests and Policy Impact 0:10:20 Profiteering from COVID Tests and Government Response 0:13:05 History of Military Involvement in Public Health 0:17:23 U.S. Defense Spending and Economic Implications 0:18:05 Ken’s Book “Diabolical Errors” and Systemic Medical Issues 0:24:18 Regulatory Framework, Patient Bill of Rights, and Hospital Abuse RESOURCES Ken McCarthy: Ken McCarthy: Ken McCarthy: /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39741660

Deadly Hospital Protocols Caused Almost 20% Excess Deaths in 2020 | John Beaudoin 01/13/2026

Deadly Hospital Protocols Caused Almost 20% Excess Deaths in 2020 | John Beaudoin Many people believe that there were no excess deaths in the United States in 2020. But is this correct? https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/deadly-hospital-protocols-caused?utm_source=youtube In this episode of my interview with John Beaudoin, we look at the CDC’s mortality data from 2018 to 2023 to find out how many people died in 2020, the first Covid year and the last Covid vaccine free year, and compare those deaths with the ones in 2021. “In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousandfold in the future. When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers, we are not simply protecting their trivial old age, we are thereby ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations.” ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956 CHAPTERS 0:00:05 US Mortality Rate in 2020 0:00:53 Excess Deaths 0:02:02 Interpreting Death Data 0:02:29 Treatment Protocol Deaths 0:04:34 NIH’s Hospital Treatment Guidelines 0:05:02 Vaccine Impact on Mortality RESOURCES They Weren’t Dying of COVID: A System Built to Kill | Ken McCarthy: https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/they-werent-dying-of-covid-a-system The Code That Doesn’t Exist: How CDC Disappears COVID Vaccine Deaths | John Beaudoin: https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/the-code-that-doesnt-exist-how-cdc The Data Trick Masking a Surge in Kidney Failure Deaths | John Beaudoin: https://flashlightsproductions.substack.com/p/the-data-trick-masking-a-surge-in John Beaudoin’s Substack: https://therealcdc.substack.com/ The Real CdC COVID: Facts for Regular People: https://www.amazon.com/Real-CdC-COVID-Regular-People/dp/B0CZMGB3R7/ref=sr_1_1?sr=8-1 Ken McCarthy: What the Nurses Saw, https://www.amazon.com/What-Nurses-Saw-Investigation-Corruption/dp/B0CPQVTDRT/ref=sr_1_1?sr=8-1 Albert Benavides website: https://www.vaersaware.com/ /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39709255

They Weren’t Dying of COVID: A System Built to Kill | Ken McCarthy 01/05/2026

They Weren’t Dying of COVID: A System Built to Kill | Ken McCarthy McCarthy is the author of the book 'What the Nurses Saw.' I asked him: “What do you think: In 50 years and 100 years, will anybody know that this happened?” This is the first part of a three part interview with author Ken McCarthy about his book “What the Nurses Saw: An Investigation Into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospitals During the COVID Panic and the Nurses Who Fought Back to Save Their Patients.” McCarthy, who became known in the 1990s for commercializing the internet and making crucial contributions to the development of online marketing, told me: “Specifically in the US, they incentivized a protocol which virtually guaranteed that people that came to the hospital with respiratory problems were going to die. Not everyone died, but over a million people died in US hospitals.” And he adds: “It was systematized and it was incentivized by the federal government of the United States.” One of the people that McCarthy interviewed for his book was AJ DePriest, a medical administrator and researcher who followed the money trail that led to the death of so many Americans. DePriest told him about the waivers that most people do not know about to this day. She told him that “CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) issued a series of waivers in early 2020 that allowed hospitals to do things for which they would have been sued and had the funding guts ripped out of them if they had done these things before COVID.” What kind of things did these waivers enable the hospitals to do? For example hiring doctors and nurses for ICU units who were in no way qualified to work there. Or banning family members from visiting their loved ones. Or suspending the Patients’ Bill of Rights and not giving water and food to Covid patients. “They had nurses working in the ICUs that hadn’t even gotten their nursing degree yet. They were still students,” he said. The hospital death protocols were systematized via the regulatory frameworks of the PREP Act and Emergency Use Authorizations for the PRC Test, Remdesivir and ventilators. And they were executed through the command chain from federal health agencies to hospital conglomerates to hospital administrators and from there down to doctors and nurses. DePriest told McCarthy when he interviewed her for his book: “We started following the CARES Act money to see where it was going, and we followed it trickling down through Health and Human Services to, eventually, the NIH. We discovered that the NIH published their protocols for inpatient treatment of COVID. From there, we started documenting the medications that were listed in the NIH protocols: remdesivir, Actemra, dexamethasone, baricitinib.” Doctors and nurses who didn’t play along, lost their jobs. All the nurses McCarthy talked to for his book “What the Nurses Saw” were fired. But almost everyone complied with the protocols. Nurses from other states who applied to work where help was needed received salaries of $10,000 per week. They were hired by medical contractor companies who also made a killing by contracting the nurses. McCarthy learnt from AJ DePriest that the contracted nurses were paid by Homeland Security. He said: “And I guess there were big pots of money available in Homeland Security. And the way it worked was there were private contractors who would arrange for the labor. They would recruit and hire and deliver the workers. Homeland Security would pay those contractors and then the contractors would pay the nurses. So the money ultimately came from Homeland Security.” How the Death Protocols Were Incentivized Deaths were incentivized through a plethora of payments and bonuses. McCarthy told me: “They created a financial incentive system that incentivized medical procedures that made no medical, scientific or logical sense that were unprecedented in the history of medicine… I think that’s where the vast majority of people I say were killed.” For example, hospitals received huge payments for simply admitting people as Covid cases. West Virginia topped all the states with almost half a million dollars payout per Covid case. Then there were payments for administering Remdesivir, intubating people and keeping them intubated for a long time. In fact, usually until death since almost everyone intubated died: “The federal government of the United States and the medical bureaucracy and what I call medical dictatorship decreed that A, hospitals would get paid if they put somebody in intubation and B, they’d get an additional bonus if they kept them on intubation for more than 96 hours.” Remdesivir also usually ended in death. Nicole Sirotek, a Nevada based nurse who came to New York City in the spring of 2020, refused to give the drug to patients and that’s why she was removed from the ICU of the hospital where she worked. McCarthy said: “She refused after a short time. She said, everybody we give this drug to dies. I’m not giving anybody else this drug anymore.” Sirotek was fired - like everyone else who spoke out against the protocols and refused to go along. The carnage in the NYC hospitals was likely the worst in the entire country. Another nurse that McCarthy interviewed, Erin Olszewski, had come to NYC from Florida in March of 2020 and began working at the ICU at Elmhurst Hospital in Queens. Both Sirotek and Olzsewski told McCarthy that patients did not die from Covid but were killed by long periods of intubation and the drug Remdesivir. New York City’s Role During The Pandemic According to McCarthy, NYC had two important roles during the so-called pandemic: It was the test case for the country - as Italy had been for Europe. And the many deaths in New York City were needed to whip the rest of America into a panic about the deadliness of Covid-19. What’s interesting in this context is that Anthony Fauci, Ken McCarthy said, “not only had a direct line to the governor of the state of New York, he also had a direct line to many of the highest level medical people in Northern Italy based on the fact that so many of them received training at NIH, specifically with him because, you know, he’s Italian American, they’re Italian, and there was this natural affinity.” Fauci did in fact maintain collegial relationships with many Italian infectious‑disease specialists. During COVID, Italian physicians in Lombardy, for example, consulted him. And Italy’s president awarded him the Knight Grand Cross of the Order of Merit for his “exceptional career” and contribution to the COVID‑19 response. “So is it a coincidence that Northern Italy was the first place, and they would have been getting their advice personally, directly from Doctor Fauci?,” McCarthy asked. Ken also told me that Fauci and the late NY Governor Mario Cuomo, the father of former NY Governor Andrew Cuomo, knew each other well: “Anthony Fauci and Mario Cuomo, the father, were very close. Anthony Fauci was friends of the Cuomo family for decades, and knew the boys, Andrew [and Chris]... Nobody knows this. And they were literally on the phone with Fauci on a daily basis.” No Accountability For The Mass Killings In US Hospitals To this day, nobody has been held accountable for the murder of countless people in NYC hospitals and other US states. Not a single official of the federal government, not one member of the military or the medical establishment. It’s not even a topic of discussion. Many Americans are probably unaware of what happened in the hospitals during Covid. So I asked McCarthy: “What do you think: In 50 years and 100 years, will anybody know that this happened?” His answer: “Well, if they read my book, they’ll know… Which is one of my motivations for writing it. But there’s a lot of things that happen in this world that are never documented. And that old saying: If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, did it really fall? Does it matter?” CHAPTERS 0:05:04 Motivation Behind “What the Nurses Saw” 0:09:28 Twitter Suspension and Social Media Challenges 0:11:30 The Book’s Timing and Institutional Neglect 0:13:49 Nurse Whistleblowers: Nicole Serotek and Erin Olszewski 0:15:33 Nicole’s Viral Testimony: ICU Conditions and Advocacy 0:20:45 Medical Response Manipulation and Context of the Pandemic Spread 0:28:02 Unqualified Medical Staff and Government Waivers 0:29:11 Introduction to AJ DePriest: Financial Incentives and Waivers 0:34:20 Patient Rights Suspended: Hospital Waivers During COVID 0:39:13 Homeland Security, Private Contractors, and Staffing 0:44:32 Financial Incentives and Deadly Hospital Protocols 0:49:13 Remdesivir, Intubation, and Incentive Structures 0:55:53 Dangers and Improper Use of Invasive Ventilation 1:01:17 Emergency Use Authorizations and Ventilator Surge 1:03:50 Media Hysteria, Ventilator Demand, and Policy Connections 1:05:53 Anthony Fauci’s Influence and the Italy Connection 1:06:58 International Ties and Political Factors in the Pandemic RESOURCES Ken McCarthy: Ken McCarthy: Ken McCarthy: /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39613780

The Code That Doesn’t Exist: How CDC Disappears COVID Vaccine Deaths | John Beaudoin 01/03/2026

The Code That Doesn’t Exist: How CDC Disappears COVID Vaccine Deaths | John Beaudoin “CDC is nefarious because they set up the system and they know there are a lot more deaths than they’re telling the people through data.” —John Beaudoin In this interview, John Beaudoin and I dive into the CDC’s mortality database that is part of its WONDER platform and find things in there that are, well, wondrous. But only in the sense that what you find makes you wonder. And way more than that: what you find are glaring signs of something horrific being covered up. WONDER, in case you’re wondering, is a web based public platform where anyone can query and download U.S. public-health data. The acronym stands for ‘Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research.’ They must have started with the oh so cute acronym and then done some serious brainstorming to find a string of words to match. According to WONDER’s mortality data, not one American died of adverse effects of the Covid-19 vaccines. Not a single one. Isn’t that wonderful? VAERS, The CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is also part of WONDER. But according to VAERS, around 50,000 people so far died of the Covid-19 vaccines. And VAERS has an underreporting factor estimated to be something between 30 and 100. The number of vaccine related deaths exploded in VAERS in 2021 and is way higher than for all vaccine deaths taken together since 1990 when VAERS saw the light of the day. Now, how can it possibly be that there are no Covid-19 vaccine deaths to be found in the U.S. official mortality data and at the same time there are 50,000 Covid-19 vaccine deaths reported, mostly by healthcare professionals, in VAERS? It’s simple. In January of 2021, the WHO issued new ICD-10 codes to cover the new mRNA Covid vaccines. And the code U12.9 was designated to be used for vaccine adverse events caused by them. ICD‑10 stands for ‘International Classification of Diseases, Revision 10.’ It’s maintained by the World Health Organization. The ICD system is vast: it contains ~70,000 diagnosis codes, and about the same number of procedure codes. These standardized alphanumeric codes are used worldwide to classify diseases as well as causes of death for statistical and billing purposes. But when you search the CDC’s WONDER database, there is not a single death listed under U12.9. In fact, it is impossible for a U12.9 coded death to exist in the WONDER database. And the reason for that is that the WONDER database does not contain the code U12.9 that the WHO especially issued in order for countries around the world to mark deaths as Covid-19 vaccine deaths. And not only that: none of the codes that the WHO added for Covid-19 are to be found in WONDER. Not one: not code U07.1 (‘COVID-10, virus identified’), not code U07.2 (‘COVID-19, virus not identified’), not code U08.9 (‘Personal history of COVID-19, unspecified’) and not code U09.9 (‘Post COVID-19 condition, unspecified’). And because U12.9 is not in WONDER, health officials across the United States could proclaim that there was not a single Covid-19 vaccine death. For example, the chief of the Bureau of Statistics of New Hampshire said publicly without batting an eye that there are no Covid vaccine related deaths in New Hampshire, zero. But then, you ask, how are Covid-19 vaccine deaths coded if not with U12.9? Because there were some brave doctors who dared to list the mRNA vaccines as cause of death on the death certificate. Such deaths are coded with U12.9’s parent code which is Y59.0. Which is meant to be used for adverse events of viral vaccines. Which the mRNA vaccines are not. Death by the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines were simply thrown in with viral vaccines. And thus it’s impossible to distinguish whether death was caused by a viral vaccine or an mRNA vaccine. Well then, how many deaths are in WONDER for viral vaccines? And that’s another miracle: Before Covid, almost none. That’s right, according to U.S. mortality data, almost nobody in the United States died from vaccine adverse events pre-Covid. To be precise: 11 deaths between 1999 and 2020 were coded with Y59.0 as Underlying Cause of Death (UCoD). Eleven. About one every other year. If you run the same query for Multiple Cause of Death (MCoD), then you get 30 deaths (in case you’re not familiar with the distinction between the two, watch my previous interview with John Beaudoin ‘The Data Trick Masking a Surge in Kidney Failure Deaths.’ The link is below under ‘Resources’). Does that number match up with what is in VAERS? Of course not. However, in 2021 something extraordinary happens in WONDER: the viral vaccine deaths increase dramatically. In 2020, the number of deaths coded with Y59.0 was so small that it was suppressed in WONDER. For privacy reasons, numbers are not shown when they are between 1 and 9. In 2020, the number of deaths coded with Y59.0 was minuscule, something between 1 and 6. But in 2021, an absolutely astonishing number of deaths is coded with Y59.0: 195. More than all the deaths coded as viral vaccine deaths taken together in the years 1999 to 2020. Granted, the number is still ridiculously tiny but compared to the 0, 1 and 2 yearly deaths in 2020 and prior, it’s virtually an explosion. This is a clear signal that something terrible happened in 2021. A signal that those running the CDC could not suppress entirely. CHAPTERS 0:00:04 Introduction and Overview of ICD-10 Codes for COVID-19 Vaccines 0:01:25 International Use and Limitations of Code U12.9 0:02:02 Origin of Codes and WHO’s Role 0:03:41 Coding Differences: Hospital vs. Death Records 0:05:50 Coding Challenges and the CDC’s Role in the US 0:08:38 Centralized vs. Decentralized Death Certificate Coding (Germany vs. US) 0:10:22 Explanation of Y59.0 and Code Subcategories 0:11:51 Defining “Viral Vaccine”: mRNA and Legal Perspectives 0:14:07 Legal Definitions and Public Perception of Vaccines 0:17:13 Parsing Errors and Misclassification on Death Records 0:18:30 Examining Data: Coding COVID-19 Vaccine Deaths 0:20:05 Historical Trends: Vaccine Death Reporting 1999–2020 0:21:49 Underlying vs. Multiple Causes of Death: CDC WONDER Query 0:24:50 Navigating CDC WONDER Query Options 0:31:15 Discrepancies Between Underlying and Multiple Cause Numbers 0:35:09 Coding Suppression and Data Editing Concerns 0:42:24 Comparing CDC Data with VAERS and VAERS-Aware Dashboard 0:44:04 Analysis of VAERS Reports: Deaths and Serious Adverse Events 0:46:47 Underreporting Factors and Regional Differences 0:48:23 Legal Risks, Advocacy, and Summary RESOURCES: /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39597745

The Data Trick Masking a Surge in Kidney Failure Deaths | John Beaudoin 12/26/2025

The Data Trick Masking a Surge in Kidney Failure Deaths | John Beaudoin “The incentives drove the acute kidney injury. My graphs show that very clearly. The acute kidney injury has been around for years. They should have known it. I've been talking about it for three and a half years.” — John Beaudoin *** John Beaudoin has been alerting the CDC and other health agencies about the catastrophic increase in renal failure deaths for more than three years. But he didn’t get any interest from the CDC or any other federal health agency or scientists working for any such agency. He thinks, he said to me, that “it's purposeful that they haven't picked up on it. I think they know it and they're afraid because… I can show the timing to the week that this happened and it didn't happen with COVID. It happened with a human intervention, not just when the drugs were approved, but months later when the drugs were incentivized by the federal government with big, big piles of money.” Incentivized drugs like Remdesivir that is known to cause kidney failure. And incentivized devices like ventilators that were a death sentence for huge numbers of people who tested positive and were intubated unnecessarily. Both Remdesivir and ventilators were declared medical countermeasures covered under the PREP Act declaration for COVID-19 - and, shockingly, they still are to this very day. When they cause death, nobody can be held responsible, nobody can be sued. Not the doctor, not the nurse, not the manufacturer - nobody. Beaudoin is in possession of 1.6 million non-redacted death certificates from the Covid years that he received through multiple FOIA requests. He read thousands of them and that’s why he knows how doctors fill them out. Large numbers of death certificates, he told me, are filled out incorrectly or are incomplete. Beaudoin also knows which ICD-10 codes (International Classification of Disease) the death certificates came back with from the CDC’s central parser and whether these codes correspond to what doctors or medical examiners wrote. And he understands how CDC analysts are hiding alarming signals in death records related to COVID treatment protocols and mRNA Covid shots. Mortality data in the CDC’s WONDER database can be analyzed either by what is called ‘Underlying Cause of Death’ (UCoD), which is row D in Part 1 on American death certificates - or by ‘Multiple Causes of Death’ (MCoD) which are listed in Part 2. Analyzing mortality data by looking just at the UCoD doesn’t give you a truthful picture of what drives mortality, he says: “I only track MCoD. I stopped using UCoD long ago when I recognized in the death records that it's not a fair and accurate representation and it could really mess up the signals.” How can he be so sure that analyzing mortality records in the US based on the underlying cause of death is obscuring what people really die from? He said: “I'm the only one that has 1.6 million non-redacted death records where I can read what the death certifier wrote… I spent three and a half years [looking at them]. I've probably seen 10,000 and, from my experience, that's how I was able to determine the value and integrity of the data of UCoD. And there's not much value in it. There's not much value in it at all, which is why I stopped using it three years ago.” However, CDC analysts and many other researchers, according to Beaudoin, use the Underlying Cause of Death to analyze causes of death and by doing so miss the real story. His prime example is the development of renal failure deaths in the United States: according to UCoD, renal failure deaths increased significantly in 2020 and again in 2021 and remained very high. However, this increase pales in comparison to the picture that emerges when MCoD is used to analyze death records: kidney failure exploded in the COVID years and far exceeds the increase shown by looking at UCoD alone. 0:00:05 Underlying and Multiple Causes of Death 0:00:36 Death Certificates and Data Integrity 0:01:12 Structure of US Death Certificates 0:02:23 Walking Through a Sample Death Certificate 0:06:22 Challenges with Properly Filling Death Certificates 0:09:00 CDC Coding Software and Issues with UCoD 0:12:00 Examples of Misrepresentation and Errors in Death Records 0:14:20 Influence of Doctor Habits and Patterns on Death Data 0:17:02 Handling Missing Values When Assigning UCoD 0:18:00 Data Integrity, State Variability, and UCoD vs. MCoD 0:21:30 Meaning of Multiple Causes of Death and Coding Implications 0:24:20 Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease on Death Certificates 0:28:54 Epidemiological Trends—Increase in Kidney Failure Deaths 0:32:16 Data Analysis—MCoD vs. UCoD, Broader Implications 0:33:10 Reverse Chronology and Doctor Confusion in Death Certificates 0:34:31 ICD-10 and Data Systems /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39538885

Using Barry Young’s Leaked Data, Hervé Seligmann Shows How Covid Injections Increase Annual Mortality Rates 12/19/2025

Using Barry Young’s Leaked Data, Hervé Seligmann Shows How Covid Injections Increase Annual Mortality Rates In the second part of my interview with biologist Hervé Seligmann we talk about his analysis of New Zealand’s health data records that were leaked in late 2023 by whistleblower Barry Young. Young worked as database administrator for New Zealand’s health agency. He was arrested in December, 2023, and is facing 7 years in prison. When Seligmann analysed the leaked treasure trove of over 1 million health records, he found that the mRNA Covid “injections accelerate the annual mortality rate which you can call or interpret as the rate of aging.” The data showed that the injections cause aging to accelerate by 2–3 times in people over 50 and that the death exponent increased from 0.07 to 0.11 after two doses. This finding, he told me, “might mean that your physiological age is...greater or you age physiologically faster than if you were not injected. That’s very possible, but it’s not 100% sure.” Shedding effects are also a possibility, however: “The other thing is that we are shedding. It’s possible that after two, three years, the non-injected get the same as the injected people… All these options are possible.” Seligmann emphasizes he does not know how long accelerated aging and accelerated mortality rates will last: “I’m not sure that this effect is long term. It could be, but we don’t have data like those from Barry Young for 2024 and 2025… It might be that there is no long-term effect and that you see an increased rate of death, an acceleration of aging for two or three years after the shots but not after five years and maybe not after 10 years.” We also talked about the extreme unreliability of the PCR tests. In Luxembourg, someone very unusual was done with positive PCR tests: every single one of them was retested within 24 hours in Luxembourg’s national reference lab. The population was not told about these mysterious retests for years. Using Luxembourg’s version of a Freedom of Information request, a friend of Seligmann did eventually receive the retest results for his positive Covid tests: “And he saw that at least one, I don’t remember, one or two of his tests were negative the next day or the same day. But he had been asked to stay 10 days at home and so on. So he was very angry: If someone knew that he was negative on the same day, [then] why did he stay 10 days at home twice?” Seligmann and his friend then asked all of their friends to submit freedom of information requests to the Luxembourg authorities to get their retest results: “And in the end, we had in total about 120 people who got that second result… So, on the background of a first positive test, we got a retest test and the retest was in over 80% of the second test negative.” In September of 2022, they sent this result to all newspapers in Luxembourg as well as to Luxembourg’s Supreme Court and to all members of the government. There was no reaction from anyone - silence from the media, the court and politicians: “We did not get any answer, any reaction from anyone… so it’s like we didn’t do it. Literally like we didn’t do it. No one speaks about it.” Another particularity in Luxembourg was that the delay between the first and second mRNA Covid injections was longer than in other countries. Seligmann told me, this longer window between successive injections might have resulted in fewer adverse events in Luxembourg: “It’s strange that we have so few very bad...adverse effects in Luxembourg, relative to other countries.” Perhaps, he said, officials intentionally delayed the second shot: “And maybe by precaution or because they knew, they tried to minimize the number of adverse events in Luxembourg, because we have, of course, adverse events, but not so many… If the delay is longer, that doesn’t mean you won’t have any adverse effects. You will simply have fewer.” CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Accelerated Aging and Death Rates Linked to Injections 0:06:07 Discussion on Short- and Long-Term Effects of Injections 0:08:35 Barry Young, Data Leaks, and Legal Consequences 0:09:34 Reiner Fuellmich; PCR Testing in Luxembourg 0:13:36 Manipulation and Official Responses to PCR Data 0:16:16 Technical Discussion: PCR Testing Accuracy and Cycle Thresholds 0:21:06 Vaccination Timing, Adverse Events, and Data Sharing in Luxembourg 0:23:51 Presentation and Impact of Excess Mortality Data 0:26:18 Patterns in Mortality Spikes and Public Health Policies 0:29:09 Vitamin D and COVID-19 Severity 0:31:08 Hospital Treatment Practices and Vitamin D Deficiency 0:33:01 Low Mortality in Early 2020, Professor Homburg’s Analysis, and Suppressed Data RESOURCES: /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503210

Omniwar: Transnational Elite's Total War Against Humanity | Jacob Nordangård 12/14/2025

Omniwar: Transnational Elite's Total War Against Humanity | Jacob Nordangård An Omnibus is a bus for everyone. You choose if you ride in it or not. An Omniwar is a war against everyone. You have no choice whether to be part of it or not. Omniwar’s goal is to plug humanity into a technocratic system of control. In which ordinary humans have no say. It’s a vertical war: Not between nations but between an uber-wealthy tech-elite and the rest of us. In my interview with renowned Swedish writer and researcher Jacob Nordangård we discuss the many facets of this dystopian type of creeping war we’re finding ourselves in. Nordangård is the author of several books, among them ‘Rockefeller: Controlling the Game’ and ‘The Global Coup d’Ètat: The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Great Reset.’ His newest book ‘The Digital World Brain’ will be published in early 2026. Omniwar, he says, manifests across many domains: Financial control, biosecurity, Agentic AI, cognitive warfare, digital surveillance, environmental control, food systems and reproduction control. Nordangård outlines the historical development that led to Omniwar: “It goes back to the 1930s and the technocratic movement. I think it could be even older than that. It’s a society run by scientists and engineers. No politicians, no vote. It’s a perfect system for control over people. People will just be cells in a kind of an organism with information about every man and woman to be retrieved immediately.” We discuss the tech elites and their companies that are driving Omniwar. Why are so many of them now ensconced in the Trump administration? Why are they and President Trump gung-ho on building thousands of gigantic AI data centers that nobody wants except a minuscule elite? What is the real purpose of the massive half a trillion AI infrastructure project called Stargate? We talk about the neo-reactionary philosopher Nick Land and political theorist Curtis Yarvin whom tech moguls like Peter Thiel and others have embraced as their house philosophers. Land and Yarvin provide the philosophical underpinning and justification for Omniwar. Nick Land coined the expression ‘Dark Enlightenment.’ What is that? And what is ‘Dark MAGA’? Understanding Omniwar is the first step to resistance. PS: There’s a surprise visitor joining the interview at the very end. Don’t miss it. CHAPTERS 0:01:35 Democracy and Technocratic Influence 0:05:31 The Omniwar Symposium 0:10:10 Technocracy and Transhumanism 0:13:22 Surveillance, and Social Control 0:18:07 Financial Surveillance and Social Credit Systems 0:22:28 Biosecurity, Health Surveillance, and Pandemic Infrastructure 0:23:43 AI, Algorithms, Government, and Pre-Crime 0:27:01 Data Centers and the Role of Elites 0:31:46 Cognitive Warfare, Information Management and Censorship 0:36:46 Digital Surveillance, IDs, and Smart City Infrastructure 0:41:40 Societal Destabilization: Immigration, Violence, and Social Response 0:49:11 Environmental Control, Carbon Management, and Resource Rationing 0:54:08 Food System Control and Dietary Mandates 0:57:31 Reproduction, Population Engineering, and Transhumanism 1:00:39 Weapons of Control: Bio, Social, and Technological 1:02:09 The Ultimate Goal – Scientific Dictatorship and Global Order 1:02:39 Resistance Strategies and Awakening Public Awareness 1:10:29 Dark Enlightenment: Philosophical Underpinnings 1:17:47 Technocrat Billionaires, Governance, and Global Influence 1:22:14 Spiritual Agenda, Esoteric Influences, and Lucis Trust 1:28:39 Ascended Masters, Secret Societies, and Hidden Agendas 1:41:40 Final Reflections, Upcoming Works, and Closing Remarks 1:44:00 Surprise Visitor RESOURCES /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503215

Biologist Hervé Seligmann Exposes Data Falsifications Designed to Conceal Devastating Effects of Covid-19 mRNA Shots 12/07/2025

Biologist Hervé Seligmann Exposes Data Falsifications Designed to Conceal Devastating Effects of Covid-19 mRNA Shots Recently, I did a series of interviews with renowned biologist Hervé Seligmann who has conducted complex statistical analyses on how the mRNA Covid injections affect all-cause mortality. The interviews with Hervé are exceptionally rich in content and cover many different and complex aspects of his research findings regarding the impact of the mRNA Covid injections. Seligmann also discusses new insights that he hasn’t publicly addressed before. He is a biologist whose work centers on evolutionary and theoretical biology. Major themes of his research are genetic code evolution, mitochondrial genomes, tRNA function, overlapping genes, and origin of life research. Over the last years, he has extensively researched and written about Covid related topics. In particular, he has conducted complex and original statistical analyses showing that Covid vaccination as well as shedding from the Covid injections are associated with increased all‑cause mortality. To do his crucial insights justice and to not overwhelm listeners, I decided to divide the interviews into multiple parts. In this first part, Seligmann discusses the chronology of Covid-19 mRNA injection devastation that should have ended the shots in early 2021: “The chronology shows that the injections should have been immediately stopped because there was data, public data that I found already in January and February 2021 that clearly showed that people were dying from the vaccines and especially those people who had [had] COVID.” In addition, he provides a high-level overview of his extraordinary findings that he will discuss in depth in subsequent parts of his interviews with me. Here are some of them: Health insurance data from New Zealand leaked by Barry Young in December of 2023 confirm increased mortalities for the injected at least up to two years post-injection. Female fertility decreases proportionally to female injection rates. The less time passed between the first injection and the second injection, the more likely people were to die. The injections cause accelerated aging where the rate of aging as a function of age is exponential. Which means that, for a person 50 or 60 years old, one year ages the person two or three times as much as a non-vaccinated person of the same age. Unvaccinated Children mortality is proportional to adult injection rates. Herve told me that the finding about child mortality in particular devastated him: “So this was very hard for me to believe and it took me about two months until I published it because for psychological reasons I couldn’t believe the result, despite it being very clear. So I checked a lot, I waited to get two more months of data and so on, but I had seen it already in April [2021]. And the result is yes, the children who were basically uninjected at the time were dying proportionally to adult injections.” CHAPTERS 0:01:23 Early Pandemic Observations 0:07:24 Start of Vaccine Safety Research 0:07:37 Early Concerns About mRNA Vaccines 0:10:50 Vaccine Effectiveness and Antibody Types 0:11:48 Flu Vaccine, Nasal Spray, and Misinformation 0:15:40 Analysis of Israeli Data 0:19:46 Adult and Child Mortality, Fertility Impact 0:24:05 Barry Young’s Leader New Zealand Data 0:28:19 Accelerated Aging RESOURCES: /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503220

How a U.N. Refugee Agency Instills Hatred in Kids and Teaches Them to Sacrifice Themselves: Karys Rhea 11/30/2025

How a U.N. Refugee Agency Instills Hatred in Kids and Teaches Them to Sacrifice Themselves: Karys Rhea The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) for Palestinian refugees publicly claims to adhere to UN values of human rights and tolerance. In my interview with Karys Rhea, we take a look at UNRWA written textbooks, classroom exercises and school materials. According to UNRWA itself, the agency “reviews all textbooks used in its schools to identify sections that may not be in line with UN values and UNESCO standards for teaching.” In Gaza, UNRWA has taken on traditional government functions by not only providing education but healthcare, social services, microfinance, and infrastructure to the ~2 million population. UNRWA is one of Gaza’s largest employers with ~13,000 employees. This arrangement has freed Gaza’s de facto government, Hamas, from governing responsibilities and has made it possible for Hamas to focus on the maintenance and expansion of its military/terror capabilities and operations. Since almost all UNRWA employees in Gaza are Palestinian refugees themselves, they are unlikely to be neutral observers of the conflict between Israel and Palestinians. Therefore, it is not surprising to find much evidence that UNRWA and Hamas are deeply intertwined with significant numbers of UNRWA employees or their immediate family members acting as Hamas operatives. For example, Hamas uses UNRWA facilities (schools, clinics, compounds) for weapons storage, tunnel access, and military activity. Some UNRWA staff celebrate attacks on Israelis on social media. At least 12 of its employees participated in the October 7 massacres, with some of the hostages being held in UNRWA buildings and guarded by its employees. Approximately one billion dollars, about 40% of UNRWA’s total annual budget of ~$2.5 billion, is spent in Gaza. Since more than half of the budget, around 55-60%, is spent on education, about $600 million goes to schools and education services. What do Palestinian children learn in UNRWA run schools? What we find in UNRWA’s reading and comprehension exercises and textbooks directly contradicts UNRWA’s claims of being aligned with humans rights and tolerance: Children are taught to “nourish the homeland with blood,” and are urged to follow in the footsteps of famous male, and also female, terrorists - like, for example, Dalal Mughrabi. Martyrdom is glorified; attacks on Israeli civilians are celebrated; jihad is promoted as life’s highest meaning and a ‘divine right.’ Jews are depicted in dehumanized ways. Children from elementary grades onward are taught that armed resistance ought to be the root of their identity and that jihad gives their lives meaning. For example, a 9th grade UNRWA-created exercise tells students that if they neglect jihad, they will be cursed by God. Students are asked to complete a sentence regarding the consequences of not caring about jihad. The correctly completed sentence reads: “The punishment of he who neglects jihad is that God curses him, blinds his eyesight, and deafens his hearing.” CHAPTERS 0:03:15 Radicalization and Education in Palestinian Society 0:09:23 Hamas’ Control and the Aftermath of the 2006 Elections 0:13:08 Factions and Clans in Gaza; Reformist Efforts 0:14:52 UNRWA as De Facto Government; Overview of Services 0:23:25 Education Under UNRWA: Schools, Curriculum, and Indoctrination 0:28:20 Textbook Examples: Glorification of Terrorism and Martyrdom 0:51:15 War in Gaza: Effects on Schools and Humanitarian Aid 0:56:18 UNRWA’s Official Perspective on Its Curriculum 1:01:11 Ties Between UNRWA, Hamas, and the October 7 Attacks 1:07:37 Humanitarian Aid in Post-UNRWA Gaza 1:09:17 Scope of Palestinian Radicalization 1:10:18 Solutions, De-radicalization, International Proposals 1:12:21 Assessing UNRWA’s Operational Complicity in the Conflict 1:17:05 Closing Reflections on Complexity and Suffering in Gaza RESOURCES /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503225

Behind the Facade of ‘Health Security’: How to Disempower and Control Citizens | Pierre Obertin 11/23/2025

Behind the Facade of ‘Health Security’: How to Disempower and Control Citizens | Pierre Obertin Please note: This is the English Voiceover version of my interview with Pierre Obertin. You can find the original version . *** In 2020 and 2021, many people, if not most, did not realize that what was happening around the entire world was an utterly cynical powergame veiled as ‘Health Security’ with the goal of disempowering, surveilling and controlling citizens. ‘Stay safe!’ This was neither the first nor the last powergame of our ever richer, reckless, vain and imperious rulers. But so far it was the most drastic and brutal one. The necessary regulatory and legal frameworks for a sequel remain in place unchanged. In the US as well as in Europe. What HAS changed is people’s realization that they were betrayed, lied to, experimented on, physically harmed and killed in a breathtakingly contemptuous and cruel way. Their next episode of powergames won’t go as smoothly. I asked Pierre Obertin, who lives in Luxembourg and has been writing about the Covid pandemic since 2021, how he assesses the current situation in Europe and how many people understand what really happened. He told me: “I think that pretty much everyone is either personally affected or knows someone in their circle of friends or family who has had a serious side effect or has even passed away. I think that by now, a lot of people have become aware of this. But they’re not walking around with a sign saying: ‘Now I understand.’ It happens inside them, it’s not visible.” “And I think,” he said, that “the crucial test will come next time. When things start again and the screws are tightened.” CHAPTERS [01:56] Why were the EU crisis responses so uniform? [04:04] Historical development of the EU health framework since the 1990s [06:50] Swine flu as a precursor and EU crisis documents [13:13] Military and security services: State of emergency and EU coordination [15:09] Pandemic plans, the influence of Imperial College London [22:37] Lockdown until vaccine: Role of vaccine development [25:51] Medical care, Remdesivir, and control politics [32:26] Joint vaccine procurement and parliamentary powerlessness [37:12] Stella Kyriakides: Responsibility for Health and Food Safety [38:31] EMA, approval pressure, and scandal documents [45:58] EU Advisory Panel: Composition and Influence [01:00:02] Panel Meetings from March 2020 and School Closures [01:04:47] Role of the ECDC and Implementation of Political Decisions as ‘Science’ [01:11:32] Italy as a Lockdown Test Case [01:12:46] Controlling the Narrative, Fear of Public Resistance [01:15:23] Lockdown Decisions, Exit Strategies, and ‘Lines to Take’ Documents [01:16:25] EU Framework for Lockdowns and Influence on Individual States [01:33:48] Authoritarian Communication Mechanisms, ‘Lines to Take’ [01:39:52] mRNA Vaccinations: Excess Mortality and Societal Consequences [01:41:18] Public Sentiment and Vaccine Criticism in Europe [01:43:06] Outlook: Digital ID, Global Public-Private Partnerships RESOURCES: /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503230

Bio-Digital Vaccine Passports and ‘On Patient Medical Recordkeeping’: Nic Hulscher 11/16/2025

Bio-Digital Vaccine Passports and ‘On Patient Medical Recordkeeping’: Nic Hulscher Did you know that the only safe medical data is data that is stored inside your own body? I didn’t know that either until Nic Hulscher recently discovered some very interesting research papers about ‘On Patient Medical Recordkeeping’ technology. The quote below is from an article that was published in PubMed six years ago, in December 2019: “Accurate medical recordkeeping is a major challenge in many low-resource settings where well-maintained centralized databases do not exist, contributing to 1.5 million vaccine-preventable deaths annually.” It took humans several hundred years to figure out that we are not able to maintain accurate medical records, but now we finally know. And it’s a lucky thing that we only figured this out now, because we are finally reaching the stage where we are able to reliably record medical data: by encoding them into every living human body - in particular data about received vaccines. There’s even a cute - no, more than cute: a heart warming acronym for this brilliant new record keeping method: OPMR. The following quote is from an article in ‘Nature Materials’ from February 2025: “We developed a robust on-patient medical record-keeping (OPMR) technology using a dissolvable microneedle patch (MNP) that delivers a quantum dot (QD)-based near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent dye encapsulated in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microparticles into the skin to encode medical information. This dye, once deposited into the dermis, is invisible to the naked eye, offering patient data privacy and anonymity, but provides discrete NIR signals that can be detected using a NIR imaging system.” Isn’t it wonderful that we have found a way to not only make it impossible to lose medical records but to keep our medical records truly private and anonymous - and especially the number of vaccine microneedle patches we got administered? Nobody will ever know - except all the folks who detect the oh so discrete Near Infrared signals with the help of the NIR imaging system. And maybe it won’t be folks much longer who detect them but some friendly AI agent. Which makes it even more sublime. We can also stop stressing about our medical records being unavailable when China or some other country cuts the subsea cables to crash the internet: “By depositing the dye in a predefined pattern that correlates to a specific set of information, the technology can be imaged by healthcare workers to support next-dose decisions without requiring internet connectivity or the use of centralized databases.” See? Internet connectivity is not required. Marvelous. Life-saving ‘next-dose decisions’ won’t be blocked ever - internet or not. And in case you were wondering whether our scientists remembered to cover the social justice angle, do not fear: “This technology could help healthcare workers make informed decisions in circumstances where reliable record-keeping is unavailable, thus contributing to global healthcare equity.” A big thank you to the wonderful people at HHS, NIH, the Koch institute and of course the Gates Foundation whose grant monies made it possible for brave scientists to develop this magnificent new record keeping method. Honestly, where would we be without our dear federal health agencies and the fabulous Gates Foundation? And they understand that only the best is good enough for us: “To enable the OPMR [On Patient Medical Record] with excellent information capacity, security and reliability, we designed the MNP [Micro Needle Patch] architecture and administration for consistent and optimal data transfer and longevity; achieved an information capacity of billions of encoded patterns using an error correcting code; and developed a temporally and spatially reliable information retrieval system using machine learning.” An information capacity of billions of encoded patterns - and with an error correcting code! The scientists deserve not just one, but at least two Freedom Medals, maybe more. And the LLMs can finally gorge themselves on data again, just when we thought we were running out. But, wait, it gets more sumptuous: these superb microneedles are not only carrying the dye for imprinting a digital code into the body but they carry a second payload. Maybe you can guess what that payload might be? EXACTLY! It’s an mRNA vaccine. Now that’s a dream come true. No more painful vaccine injections, the long needles replaced with eensy weensy ones. Infants and toddlers won’t even know they’re being vaccinated. This is what the February 2025 article says: “We optimize the microneedle design for both a reliable delivery of messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics and the near-infrared fluorescent microparticles that encode the on-patient medical record-keeping… Long-term studies in a swine model demonstrate the safety, efficacy and reliability of this approach for the co-delivery of on-patient medical record-keeping and the mRNA vaccine encoding severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).” Superb. We all know about the safety and efficacy of the amazing mRNA vaccines and to have them co-delivered straight into our bodies in tandem with our precious medical data is a stroke of genius. This elegant new technology will not only turn us into walking bio-digital vaccine passports that will be biosensed by deep learning-based image processing agents, but - even more delicious - we will be loaded with the newest and best mRNA vaccines the science has to offer. How exactly does this biosensing work you want to know? It’s simple and can be done from a smartphone: “An Android smartphone application ‘IR Record’ was custom developed to capture the OPMR NIR dye signal and can save images. The software is designed to take 30 consecutive images with six different exposure settings and five different gain settings. This bracket scanning method allows the capture of NIR signals with varying intensities over time. Among the 30 images, one image with the best reading results gets automatically chosen and processed.” Five different gain settings and six (!) different exposure settings! Now you can start scanning yourself first thing in the morning to get your day off to a good start. That’s what I call resilience. The researchers also note: “In cases of emergency like in a pandemic or natural disaster, or at refugee or military camps, OPMR patches can be administered on-demand.” And not only administered, but possibly self-administered. Since we know that the recent pandemic was just a rehearsal, it is most reassuring to know that we will not have to stand in line during the next pandemic. The dissolvable microneedle patch might come to you by old-fashioned snail mail so that you can administer it in the privacy of your own home. What’s more to be wished for? Well, thinking about it, there are more dreams to come true. A bio-digital vaccine passport is a solid start for sure, but we should not let ourselves be limited to the vaccine aspect. A bio-digital passport could be good for all sorts of things that society has to offer. It would make a tremendous ‘Open sesame!’ for daily life, from the doors to the supermarket to the doors of the restaurant, movie theatre, train and bus. Not to forget the door of one’s own apartment. Maybe the relevant authorities need reminding that our own doors require scanning not just from outside to inside but also from inside to outside. To keep us all safe. Because what if you forgot to administer the patch sent to you in the mail? No big deal: you’ll be reminded as soon as you try to get out of the door. Voilà! Oh, the awesomeness. CHAPTERS 0:00:08 Introduction to Micro Needle Patch and Quantum Dots 1:01:44 Vaccine Tracking, Societal Control, and Concerns Raised 0:03:50 Technical Foundations: Quantum Dots Longevity and Detection 0:04:10 Smartphone Scanning and Machine Learning Usage 0:08:09 Historical Context: AI, Data Centers, and Early Research 0:09:47 Vaccine Delivery, Co-delivery Methods, and Antibody Response 0:11:14 Envisioning Dystopian Control and Compliance 0:15:38 Decentralized Data Storage and Bio Sensing Discussion 0:16:59 Wearables, Biosensing, and Public Endorsements 0:19:06 Technical, Material, and Health Concerns 0:20:41 How the Patch Works: Schematics and Challenges 0:24:40 Societal Control: AI, Compliance, and Bypass Loopholes 0:28:51 Next-Generation Patch: mRNA, Self-Administration, and Trust Issues 0:35:00 Privacy, Data Storage in the Body, and Centralization 0:41:21 Expansion to mRNA Applications and Potential Harm 0:44:03 Digital Identities and Multipurpose Use Cases 1:01:45 Resistance, Public Compliance, and Civil Rights 1:12:32 Public Awareness, Accountability, and Call to Action RESOURCES: /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503235

How Mass Dismissal of Covid-Era Civil Cases Undermines Americans’ Most Fundamental Right: John Beaudoin 11/06/2025

How Mass Dismissal of Covid-Era Civil Cases Undermines Americans’ Most Fundamental Right: John Beaudoin In 2020, the year society was locked down and basic constitutional rights of the entire US population were discarded, civil cases increased by more than 60%. In that year alone, there was an excess of lawsuits compared to prior years of over 180,000 cases: John Beaudoin told me: “Did they hire 62% more people to handle those cases? No. Did everybody in the court system, all the judges and all the clerks, work 62 % more hours? Like 14 hours a day, every day for a year? No. There’s only one way to do this: Dismiss, dismiss, dismiss.” And that is what happened: mass dismissals of civil lawsuits based on the standing doctrine. To have standing, the plaintiffs must prove harm from the action or conduct they’re challenging. And one would think that this should be easy. It is anything but. Beaudoin points to two rather recent landmark Supreme Court Cases that drastically raised the bar for plaintiffs to have sufficient standing so that their case would survive a motion to dismiss: Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009). According to Beaudoin, “Legal doctrines like Twombly and Iqbal let judges dismiss nearly any case if it’s deemed implausible or lacking facts, no matter the injustice.” To get an idea how often SCOTUS referred to Twombly and Iqbal to dismiss cases, he gathered the numbers of case citations for all cases decided by the Supreme Court: “I gleaned these from Google Scholar. I’ve since checked it out at Westlaw. And although the numbers are different, they’re proportional. So the graph would look exactly the same, but the bottom numbers would be like 380,000 instead of 300,000. But the others would go up, too, proportionally. So Westlaw is counting differently than Google Scholar.” Astonishingly, Twombly and Iqbal are the most quoted cases with almost 300,000 citations each. Despite the fact that these cases have only been around for about 16 years: According to Beaudoin, both Twombly and iqbal “were used before COVID, but since COVID came, the courts use these two cases to blow everything out of the water.” And he continued: “I can prove that many of these cases were unrighteously dismissed, or I can prove that they used dismissal doctrines in the court and civil procedure to never hear the substance of these cases.” The First Amendment of the United States Constitution lists the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. That right, says Beaudoin, is the most foundational right for citizens to uphold and protect their other core rights like freedom of speech and freedom of religion. But what’s the value of a theoretical right to petition for a redress of grievances, if it’s near to impossible to get standing, i.e. to have the court acknowledge that grievances did in fact happen to the plaintiff? “If we can’t get resolution in the courts, there’s nowhere else to go. And the courts refuse to do their jobs,” he says. The question then is what happens to a society where the courts are not doing their job of dispute resolution. Where courts dismiss citizens’ cases for even the most serious breaches of fundamental constitutional rights. Beaudoin is convinced that as a consequence civil society starts breaking down: “You have people dividing into camps because the issues are not being settled or adjudicated. And so you leave it to society to fight amongst each other, fight on social media, fight in the streets. We’re devolving as a civil society based on what’s happened with these two cases and the way the courts are operating, extremely inefficiently dismissing righteous cases that should be heard.” But societal breakdown is not inevitable, he emphasizes, because the underlying cause is fixable: “What is the root cause where, if you change something, you can fix the whole system? One of the things that you can fix is standing doctrine and that would fix a lot in the United States.” And who should fix it? “John Roberts came in in 2005 as Chief Justice. Those cases I just showed you were two years after he got there and four years after he got there. He broke it. His court broke the system, so he’s got to fix it. Or the United States will devolve into civil war.” CHAPTERS 0:00:00 Introduction and Overview of Graph Data 0:00:50 Explanation of Yearly Data Variation 0:01:09 Highlighting Significant Data Points 0:13:09 Standing Doctrine 0:13:32 Further Analysis of Legal Standing and Case Dismissals 0:14:29 Critique of Judicial System and Focus on Courts 0:18:40 Why The PREP Act Is Unconstitutional 0:20:00 Beaudoin’s Petition to the Supreme Court 0:22:19 Root Cause Analysis and Call for Judicial Reform RESOURCES Beaudoin’s Substack: /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503240

Hiding Covid Shot Deaths from the American People: John Beaudoin 10/31/2025

Hiding Covid Shot Deaths from the American People: John Beaudoin “Massachusetts has been committing fraud as a matter of custom and practice every single day when they write COVID on death records when it’s not COVID and omit the vaccine as a cause of death, when they know it’s the vaccine,” John Beaudoin told me. It’s not just Massachusetts or other U.S. states that are manipulating death certificate data. According to Beaudoin, the CDC stopped using the proper ICD (Internal Classification of Diseases) code to classify deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccinations. Systems engineer John Beaudoin succeeded in obtaining all official Massachusetts death records from 2015 through 2024: “I was going to the gym one morning and I heard that a seven year old girl, Cassidy Baracka, died from COVID in January of 2022. I thought to myself that there’s no way a healthy seven year old girl dies from COVID. Doesn’t happen. It hasn’t happened. Not a single time. And so I asked for her death record.” Massachusetts, where Beaudoin lives, is one of the very few states in America that allows unrestricted public access to death certificates. Nonetheless, his request was denied: “They wouldn’t give Cassidy’s death certificate to me. I did eight different public records requests for all kinds of stuff. I ran them through other people, so that my name wouldn’t be on all of them.” Massachusetts refused all his public record requests except the one where he asked for ALL of the state’s death records from 2015: “Only one of my eight requests came through. And it was the one that asked for all the death records from 2015 … I was kind of scared. Did they give these to me by accident? Are they going to take them away?” Beaudoin then cross-referenced the Massachusetts death records with VAERS data and uncovered widespread data fraud. According to his findings, the CDC stopped coding deaths related to Covid-19 vaccinations with the appropriate ICD codes. In addition, he uncovered plenty of evidence that doctors and medical examiners in Massachusetts issued fraudulent death certificates, labelling Covid shot deaths and other non-Covid deaths as Covid deaths. Although physicians and medical examiners fill out death certificates, they are not authorized to add the ICD code that corresponds to the cause of death. This is the job of a central federal agency, the CDC. Therefore, all states must send all their death certificates to a central parsing system run by the CDC: “They have two software programs called Transax and ACME. And those two programs read the words, they parse the words, and they spit out codes.” There is an ICD code for Covid shot deaths: U12.9. However, this code is apparently hardly ever used by the CDC. Instead, the CDC codes Covid shots as Y59.0, a code that encompasses all ‘viral vaccines.’ Beaudoin told me: “U12.9 means Covid-19 vaccine specifically. It’s not used on death records. There are notations in the literature of England and Germany where there’s an asterisk under U12.9 and it says that it’s not really used much and it’s a subcategory of Y59.0.” After the CDC codes the death certificates, they are sent back to the states. And that’s how Beaudoin was able to check whether the ICD codes corresponded to the cause of death written on the death certificates by physicians and medical examiners. He said: “I’m betting that the software actually spit out the Y59.0. And on some it went through, but on others they deleted it and they sent it back to the States without the Y59.0. Somebody I believe at the CDC has been deleting Y59.0.” Later, when he also got access to death certificates in Connecticut and Minnesota, states where death records are also public, he discovered the same phenomenon: “The first one in Connecticut is coded. The next three in Connecticut, not coded … So you have three states [Massachusetts, Connecticut, Minnesota] in which the first one’s coded, the rest aren’t. They stopped coding them. Why? They’re hiding the vaccine deaths from the American people.” When Beaudoin examined the ICD-coded death data for the entire United States using the CDC’s WONDER Multiple Cause of Death database, he found fewer than 300 deaths coded under Y59.0 for all the years following the onset of COVID-19: CHAPTERS 0:00:00 John’s Childhood Hearing Loss & the 1968 Hong Kong Flu 0:04:33 Early Life Memories and Academic Background 0:05:12 Analyzing CDC Data and Losing Trust 0:09:56 Lawsuit Over Mask Mandate and Experiences with Exemptions 0:12:26 Facing Public Pushback Over Mask Exemption 0:16:21 Strategy Against Mask Policies and Exception Details 0:21:15 Entering Data Analysis and Legal Battles Post-Law School 0:24:54 Obtaining Massachusetts Death Records and First Discoveries 0:29:37 Vaccine Reactions and The Cassidy Case 0:35:40 Death Certificate Certifiers and Patterns in Data 0:40:07 Financial Incentives Driving Hospital COVID Diagnoses 0:47:39 How Evidence-Based Medicine and Coding Changed Healthcare 0:52:17 Doctor-Patient Relationship in the Age of Electronic Records 0:57:13 Investigating Young Vaccine-Related Deaths 1:01:02 Media Suppression and the Cascade of Preventable Tragedies 1:07:44 ICD Codes, Centralization, and CDC Manipulation 1:18:12 Decentralized Coding Practices and Data Errors 1:23:08 Government Censorship and Social Media Control 1:29:14 Professional Threats to Doctors and Board Certifications RESOURCES Beaudoin’s Substack: /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503250

“You can't be America first and look the other way when they're murdering American citizens” - Dr. Joseph Sansone 10/20/2025

“You can't be America first and look the other way when they're murdering American citizens” - Dr. Joseph Sansone Dr. Joseph Sansone: “People need to really get what I’m saying: Most people that you know will die from these injections.” The debate must shift from arguing about mRNA Covid shot mandates and “recommendations” to arguing that these shots are biological weapons of mass destruction, Sansone says: “You can’t win by arguing mandates. So you have to take a stake and go right into the vampire’s heart. These are weapons of mass destruction.” Sansone argues that mRNA injections are already illegal according to existing bioweapon laws and existing weapons of mass destruction laws because it is widely known that the shots are causing carnage among the population: “You’re shortening lifespans, you’re reducing birth rates … These injections cause neurological problems, heart problems, cancers, and so on. They’re associated with increased infant mortality and fertility problems … If you’re a 35 year old man or woman and you got this injection and you only live to be 63 instead of 80, they just stole 17 years of your life.” Knowing about the harmfulness of the shots, he says, meets the knowingness standard of intent and this creates a criminal and civil liability for anyone having anything to do with the shots. Sansone not only talks the walk but walks the walk: “The court system needs to get flooded with cases. Go think back into the 50s and 60s with all the civil rights cases. They filed case after case after case after case.” And that’s exactly what he has been doing since early 2023 when he introduced his first ‘Ban the Jab’ resolution in Lee County, Florida. The resolution declared COVID‑19 and mRNA injections “biological and technological weapons of mass destruction” and called on Governor Ron DeSantis and the Attorney General to ban the Covid shots in Florida. The late Dr. Francis Boyle, main author of the 1989  Biological Weapons Anti‑Terrorism Act, endorsed his resolution. In 2024, Sansone filed a lawsuit, a so-called writ of mandamus, against Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody in the Florida Supreme Court. His goal is to force the Governor to prohibit the Covid-19 mRNA shots in Florida. Subsequently, he drafted the “Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act” which criminalizes the manufacturing, distribution, and possession of any products that make use of mRNA technology. In April this year, several Republican representatives in the Minnesota legislature were the first ones nationwide to introduce his bill. Sansone is asking Americans to get his mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act introduced in many more states: “You go find someone who might have the courage to do it and get it introduced because one, it’s going to make a splash, even with all the censorship, it’s going to get out there and people’s heads will spin. This gets introduced in places like New Jersey, New York or California, their heads are going to spin. They’re not going to know how to handle that … Let’s say we can get this introduced in like a dozen or 15 states. A lot of states don’t come back in a session until January. But let’s say we can get this introduced in a bunch of states. The writing is going to be on the wall … Eventually the mRNA shots are going to get prohibited in the whole country or we’re going to have a revolution.” Why has it taken more than 2 years from his first ‘Ban the Jab’ resolution to having the mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act introduced in the first state? He says: “The reason we’re not where we should be is because when I did that first ‘Ban the Jab’resolution, I got as much pushback from ‘our’ side as I did from the other side and most of the people in the alternative media are still censoring what I and other people like me have been doing because they don’t want to admit these are weapons because they’re either afraid of losing access or being canceled.” Those who could stop the shots - the President, the head of the FDA, state governors, district attorneys, prosecutors,sheriffs - are not doing it: “These people are either complicit or looking the other way which makes them complicit in biological warfare against the American people … They could literally change the course of human history, but that would require a little courage. These people are afraid.” We also talk about the Dutch law case brought by several Dutch citizens harmed by the mRNA shots and the unexplained arrest of Arno van Kessel, one of the lawyers that are representing them. The plaintiffs are suing, among others, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, the former Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte as well as the entire Dutch government. CHAPTERS 0:00:17 Clinical Hypnosis Background and Susceptibility 0:01:41 Intelligence, Authority, and Brainwashing 0:04:46 COVID-19 Injections as Bioweapons: Early Awareness and Legal Context 0:09:01 Legal Challenges: Mandamus Case and Procedural Issues 0:16:02 Health Impacts, Shedding, and Filing Appeals 0:22:48 Role of Public Health Officials and Political Responses 0:36:30 Drafting and Promoting Bio-Weapons Prohibition Legislation 0:41:38 Provisions and Implications of the Proposed Law 0:46:27 Overcoming Legal Barriers and Grassroots Advocacy 0:54:54 Scientific Support, Public Perception, and Broader Vaccine Debates 1:02:14 Francis Boyle’s Expertise, Affidavit, and His Passing 1:08:16 The Dutch Lawsuit Against Bill Gates 1:12:45 Legal Risks, Arrest of Lawyer Arno van Kessel 1:18:14 Trump, Pfizer Deal, and Political Disappointment RESOURCES /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503255

Pandemien im Dienst der Machtkonzentration: Die Orchestrierung von Covid-19 in der EU | Pierre Obertin 10/13/2025

Pandemien im Dienst der Machtkonzentration: Die Orchestrierung von Covid-19 in der EU | Pierre Obertin To my English speaking viewers: I will release the interview with English voiceover in a little while. Or you can watch it on YouTube with English subtitles turned on: *** Wieso lief die Inszenierung der Covid-19 Pandemie so reibungslos ab in der EU - ganz so wie in den USA, Kanada, Australien und anderen Ländern? Es war, als wäre das alles schon vorher geprobt und einstudiert worden. Pierre Obertin, Autor des Substacks “Expressis Verbis”, sagte mir während unseres Interviews: “Die Sache war schon irgendwie am Laufen. Da ging es eigentlich nur noch darum, das irgendwie zu koordinieren. Und da gab es dann halt auch, wie wir jetzt erfahren haben, Kommunikationswege: da war schon geplant, wie das ablaufen sollte.” Obertin schreibt seit 2021 über die Covid Pandemie und hinterfragt das der Weltbevölkerung vorgeschriebene offizielle Narrativ. Er ist Luxemburger und lebt in Luxemburg. An der Technischen Universität in Kaiserslautern hat er seinen Masters Degree in angewandter Mathematik gemacht und momentan arbeitet er als Informatiklehrer. Warum gab - und gibt es - ein weltweites Rahmenwerk, das wie ein gut geöltes Uhrwerk alle Räder, Federn und Regler bereits am richtigen Platz hatte, als im Januar 2020 der Anpfiff kam? Ganz einfach: weil das Machtspiel bühnenreif war. Weil die entscheidungsbefugten Institutionen und deren Vertreter aus den “Fehlern” der anderen nicht ganz so glatt abgelaufenen Pandemien, wie der Schweinegrippe, gelernt hatten. Weil es zig mal geprobt worden war: in den USA (Dark Winter, Atlantic Storm, CLADE X, Event 201) wie in der EU. Generalprobe für die EU war “Blue Orchid” im Februar 2019. In unserem Interview beschreibt Pierre die Strukturen innerhalb der EU, die über die letzten Jahrzehnte für die ganz großen geplanten Machtspiele aufgebaut und getestet wurden - wie eben die Pandemiekrise. Obertin: “Corona kam ja nicht von heute auf morgen. Das ging eigentlich schon los in den 90er Jahren. Nach dem Ende des Kalten Krieges musste irgendwie was Neues kommen. Und dann ging es ja auch los in den 90er Jahren mit dem Klima. Das Thema Klima kam und eben auch das andere Thema: ansteckende Krankheiten. Die sollten wieder kommen.” Bei der Schweinegrippe 2010, da klappte es noch nicht so ganz. Aber zehn Jahre später war es dann soweit: Vorhang auf für Corona. Und die Rolle der Bevölkerung? Zuschauen, Eintauchen in das Märchen, “dispense disbelief”, Beifall klatschen und immer wieder den Arm hinhalten für regelmäßige “Schutzspritzen.” Dass es hier im Namen der “Gesundheitssicherheit” in Wirklichkeit um die Entmachtung der eigenen Bevölkerung ging, das war 2020 vielen nicht klar. Beim zweitenmal wird es wohl nicht ganz so glatt über die Bühne gehen. KAPITEL [00:00] Einführung, Vorstellung von Pierre und Thema des Interviews [00:44] Pierre über seine Artikel, beruflicher Hintergrund und Covid-Fokus [01:56] Warum waren die EU-Krisenreaktionen so einheitlich? [04:04] Historische Entwicklung des EU-Gesundheitsrahmens seit den 1990ern [06:50] Schweinegrippe als Vorlauf und EU-Krisendokumente [09:27] Wissenschaft und Krisenkommunikation: Wer entscheidet? [13:13] Militär und Security Services: Ausnahmezustand und EU-Koordination [15:09] Pandemiepläne, der Einfluss des Imperial College London [19:36] Die Voraussagen und Publikationen zur Pandemie [21:11] Epidemie-Definitionen und erste Covid-Entwicklungen in Europa [22:37] Lockdown until vaccine: Rolle der Impfstoffentwicklung [25:51] Medizinische Versorgung, Remdesivir und Kontrollpolitik [28:56] Politische Struktur der EU: Von der Leyen und Kommissions-Mechanismen [31:14] Ursula von der Leyen und Berateraffäre [32:26] Gemeinsamer Impfstoffeinkauf und parlamentarische Machtlosigkeit [34:46] Entscheidungsstrukturen und Einfluss einzelner Kommissare [37:12] Stella Kyriakides: Verantwortung für Health and Food Safety [38:31] EMA, Zulassungsdruck und Skandal-Dokumente [42:55] DG Health, Unterbehörden, Kernfunktionen der Pandemiepolitik [45:58] EU Advisory Panel: Zusammensetzung und Einfluss [51:16] Interessen, Gain of Function und Vernetzungen im Panel [57:03] Entscheidungsträger und Machtverhältnisse im Panel [01:00:02] Panel-Meetings ab März 2020 und Schulschließungen [01:04:47] Rolle des ECDC und Umsetzung politischer Entscheidungen als “Wissenschaft” [01:11:32] Italien als Lockdown-Testfall [01:12:46] Kontrolle des Narrativs, Angst vor Widerstand der Bevölkerung [01:15:23] Lockdown-Beschlüsse, Exit-Strategien und “Lines to take”-Dokumente [01:16:25] EU-Rahmen für Lockdowns und Einfluss auf Einzelstaaten [01:33:48] Autoritäre Kommunikationsmechanismen, “Lines to Take” [01:39:52] mRNA-Impfungen: Übersterblichkeit und gesellschaftliche Folgen [01:41:18] Gesellschaftliche Stimmung und Impfkritik in Europa [01:43:06] Ausblick: Digitale ID, Global Public Private Partnerships [01:44:21] Fazit und Abschied RESOURCEN: . /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503260

How VAERS Disguises mRNA Covid Shot Deaths of 400 Children: Albert Benavides and Melanie Llewellyn 10/05/2025

How VAERS Disguises mRNA Covid Shot Deaths of 400 Children: Albert Benavides and Melanie Llewellyn Albert Benavides, the creator of , told me: “Of those 200 official dead kids that are officially in there [VAERS], there’s actually 600 dead kids, but you don’t see them because the age field is not populated.” Surprisingly, age is not a required field when submitting a report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the database managed by the CDC and FDA to track vaccine-related injuries and deaths. In fact, hardly any fields on the VAERS form are mandatory. Albert explains: “And yet, the age is properly documented in the summary narrative. More than 400 of these actual dead kids are sitting in a bucket of unknown ages.” Those 400 reports are still in the system, but without an age attached, they aren’t counted in the official total for children’s deaths. That’s how VAERS ended up concealing the deaths of 400 children who died after the mRNA shots. Albert uncovered this information through meticulous analysis of VAERS data, by reviewing individual reports, and extracting details from the summary narratives. Through this effort, he estimates that the actual number of child deaths linked to mRNA COVID-19 shots is closer to 600, rather than the officially reported 200. However, even that figure may fall short of the true total. VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on voluntary reporting. As a result, the actual number of vaccine-related injuries and deaths is uncertain. A 2011 Harvard report found that fewer than 1% of all adverse events are reported to VAERS. However, deaths occurring shortly after vaccination are likely to be reported at a higher rate, though the exact percentage remains unknown. For deaths that occur longer after vaccination, the likelihood of reporting is probably much lower, suggesting an even greater degree of underreporting. Another disturbing ‘feature’ of VAERS is that a significant number of valid reports are never made publicly available through the CDC’s WONDER system, and many reports are later removed. React19, a Covid-19 vaccine injury support group, discovered during a 2022 audit that 1 out of 3 adverse event reports submitted to VAERS by their members were never published. As data analyst Albert Benavides puts it: “It almost makes everything else a moot point if we know that we’re basically analyzing curated data and that VAERS basically does not publish all legitimate reports received.” The issue isn’t simply system failure - it raises the concern that the system may deliberately be structured in a way to conceal the full scope of vaccine-related injuries and deaths. HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy is well aware of the problem. During the interview, Albert recounts how Kennedy came to speak at Albert’s church in San Jose, California: “On June 19, 2021, Bobby came to our church. And he’s only said it once. I’ve never heard him say it again. The week before he had met with a group of various CDC adjudicators who came to him as a group and collectively told him that 150,000 reports had disappeared from their queues. And these were all reports that they were working on to adjudicate, to finalize and publish. This is in line with what we’re saying that React 19 has people that have published reports and that have never been published. And I have submitted reports that have never been published.” The VAERS/CDC adjudicators who came to Robert Kennedy in 2022 to alert him to the 150,000 disappeared reports: who are they? Who made the reports disappear from VAERS? Who gave the order to make them disappear? We do not know. CHAPTERS 0:00:00 Introduction, President’s Vaccine Statement, and Letter Plans 0:02:27 Albert Joins and Overview of VAERS Data Analysis 0:05:31 Explanation of React19 and VAERS Report Issues 0:08:51 Deleted and Missing VAERS Reports: Causes and Concerns 0:12:46 Public Visibility and Permanent IDs in VAERS 0:17:34 Underreporting and Hidden Data in VAERS 0:19:46 VAERS adjudicators Tell RFK that 150,000 Reports Disappeared 0:23:13 Temporary vs. Final ID Numbers and Data Discrepancies 0:31:33 VAERSaware Dashboard: Data Overview and Demonstration 0:36:11 Age and State Data Issues in VAERS Reports 0:43:42 Dashboard Features: Gender, Lot Numbers, and Toxic Batches 0:48:50 Lot Sizes, Shipments, and Data Limitations 0:52:45 Data Lags and Delays in Report Publication 0:55:13 Missing Data and Adjudication Problems 1:02:53 What Should Happen to VAERS: Albert’s Ideas RESOURCES /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503265

“The machine never sleeps, never eats, never is sick. It monitors you nonstop.” Interview with Jacob Nordangård 09/24/2025

“The machine never sleeps, never eats, never is sick. It monitors you nonstop.” Interview with Jacob Nordangård In the concluding part of my interview with Jacob Nordangard, we continue to explore the dystopian future that self-appointed ‘Global Leaders’ are planning for the rest of us. A White Paper titled ‘The Agentic State’, published by the Global Government Technology Center Berlin (GGTC Berlin) in May of 2025, lays out a future in which AI agents take control of all functions of government. Luukas Ilves is the lead author of the White Paper. He’s also advisor to Ukraine’s Deputy Prime Minister, son of Estonia’s former President, former Chief Information officer of Estonia and one of WEF’s Young Global Leaders. In the White Paper, Ilves describes various features of Agentic AI Governance; he pictures a future where laws will become ‘living laws’ that AI agents can change at any time. Legislators won’t be needed anymore, humans will be monitored continuously, and compliance with regulation is enforced around the clock. ‘Polycrises’ will be met with a ‘Hyper-aware AI-orchestrated first response’: “When a crisis begins to unfold, AI initiates the first steps in crisis response before human-in-the-loop structures have time to react.” Moreover, such AI agents “will work alongside increasingly autonomous physical systems such as drones and robots, forming the backbone of a responsive, adaptive crisis infrastructure.” “Human-in-the-loop structures” will eventually disappear completely from the governing loop. And AI agents will closely observe and manipulate the emotions of its ‘out-of-the-loop’ humans. That’s the vision that the WEF and the Global Government Technology Center Berlin are hoping to realize for billions of people. To reach this goal, Luukas Ilves calls for a “new leadership archetype for the agentic AI era.” It stands to reason that Ilves might consider himself as the embodiment of this new leadership archetype. He has political ambitions and already ran, albeit unsuccessfully, for the European Parliament. CHAPTERS 05:52 Exploring the Agentic State and Its Implications 08:38 The Role of Young Global Leaders in Governance 11:31 Deep Dive into the White Paper’s Key Concepts 13:37 Agentic Internal Workflows and Their Consequences 16:12 Outcome-Based Governance and Its Risks 19:21 The Dangers of AI in Bureaucratic Systems 22:07 Corruption and AI: A Systemic Issue 25:18 The Future of Human Involvement in Governance 28:02 Crisis Response and Resilience in Governance 36:01 The Power of Panic: Control Through Fear 36:49 Singleton Theory: A Centralized Power Structure 40:19 Simulations and Reality: Testing Crisis Responses 43:12 AI in Crisis Management: The Rise of Autonomous Systems 47:08 Surveillance and Compliance: The New Normal 49:03 The Future of Governance: Living Laws and AI 53:57 Ethics and Compliance: The Tyranny of Agentic Systems 01:11:05 The United Nations and Global Goals 01:13:55 Agentic Policymaking and Democracy 01:19:15 Emotion Detection and Citizen Signals 01:24:54 Leadership in the Age of AI 01:30:18 The Dystopian Future of Governance 01:44:29 Awareness and Resistance Against the Agenda /episode/index/show/ded8f89f-85da-4914-8fb3-ce93c9c1af26/id/39503270

Flashlights

TOPICS