Wrong Ride Home: Beyond the Book
Wrong Ride Home: Beyond the Book is where the story continues—beyond what could be written, and into what still lingers. In this podcast, Donna Waters revisits the real-life story behind Wrong Ride Home, sharing the moments that didn’t make it onto the page, the emotions that never really settled, and the questions that still don’t have clear answers. Through honest reflection and immersive storytelling, each episode explores the deeper human side of the case—the impact, the uncertainty, and the quiet weight of living with a story that doesn’t end when the book does. This isn’t just a retelling. It’s what comes after.
info_outline
Chapter Thirteen: 12 Minutes
08/18/2026
Chapter Thirteen: 12 Minutes
A guilty verdict ended the trial. But it didn't end the questions. In Episode 24 of Wrong Ride Home: Beyond the Book, we move into Chapter 13 and the day Austin Burke learned just how much of his life the State of Ohio intended to take. Before sentencing, his attorneys made one last attempt to challenge the conviction. They asked for an acquittal. They asked for a new trial. They pointed to conflicting witnesses, questions surrounding the evidence, and issues they believed had affected Austin's right to a fair trial. Those motions were denied. Then Austin stood before Judge Logan. Brandon Sample's family spoke about the life they had lost and the sentence they believed justice required. The prosecution asked for Austin to never come home. The defense asked the court to consider that the person standing before it was only eighteen years old. And Austin was given an opportunity to speak. His answer was two words. “No, sir.” Judge Logan sentenced him to 47 years to life. But Austin's morning wasn't over. He was taken to another courtroom, before another judge, for sentencing in a separate case involving a modified spoon found in his jail cell. His family remembers being left outside. The media apparently had access. Austin was asked again whether he wanted to say anything. Again: “No, sir.” Then another judge added 11 years and ordered Austin removed from his courtroom. The records surrounding that morning leave us with an extraordinary window of time. Twelve minutes. So in this episode, I'm not simply going to tell you that twelve minutes isn't very long. We're going to experience it together. I'm starting the clock. And for twelve minutes, I want you to imagine what it would feel like to hear numbers that could determine the rest of your life... while still maintaining that you didn't commit the murder that put you there. This episode isn't only about sentencing. It's about two grieving families living two completely different realities. It's about what happens after a jury says guilty. And it's about the beginning of Jamie's transformation from a mother trying to understand the legal system... into a mother who would have to learn how to navigate it if she ever hoped to bring her son home. Chapter 13: 12 Minutes. Sometimes twelve minutes can change everything.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/42472360
info_outline
Bonus Episode: The Story the Jury Was Given, Part Two: When the Story Became Proof
08/11/2026
Bonus Episode: The Story the Jury Was Given, Part Two: When the Story Became Proof
In Part One, we looked at how the State’s case was built. In Part Two, we test it. This episode looks at what happened after the pieces had already been arranged into one complete story. What evidence was lost, destroyed, never collected, or never fully tested? Which witnesses stayed closest to what they actually knew? What did the defense successfully expose? And what happened when closing arguments turned uncertainty into certainty? Because during testimony, there were limits. The phone records did not place Austin at Brandon’s body. The gun was traced to its original retail purchaser, but not tied ballistically to Brandon’s murder. The Pizza Joe’s surveillance video did not show the robber entering Melanie Engle’s apartment. The recovered money did not equal the amount missing from the restaurant. Brandon’s phone, wallet, and keys were never recovered. And yet, by closing argument, many of those unanswered questions had become answers. Similar became same. Missing became hidden. A general area became an exact location. And possibility became proof. In this episode, I also take a hard look at credibility, the defense’s strongest accomplishments, and the difference between exposing reasonable doubt and giving a jury a story they can actually carry into deliberations. Then, for the first time in this series, I ask a different question: What might a closing argument have sounded like if every limitation in the evidence had remained attached? Could that evidence have proved each charge beyond a reasonable doubt? Because the jury heard a complete story. The evidence never told one.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/42387385
info_outline
Bonus Episode: The Story the Jury Was Given, Part One: How the Pieces Became a Story
08/07/2026
Bonus Episode: The Story the Jury Was Given, Part One: How the Pieces Became a Story
By the time the State rested its case against Austin Burke, the jury had been given what sounded like one complete story. There were witnesses who said Austin confessed. There was Hatchet Man Road. There was a distinctive silver gun Austin had been photographed holding. There were phone records, deleted messages, gray clothing, cash found inside an apartment across from Pizza Joe’s, and eventually, a witness who pointed across the courtroom and identified Austin as the man he saw running from the robbery. Piece by piece, it looked like everything fit. But did it? In this special bonus episode, I step away from reviewing the trial one witness at a time and look at something bigger: how the State’s case was actually built. We follow the alleged confession witnesses and ask whether five voices really meant five independent sources. We look at Hatchet Man Road—the detail that made so much of the State’s story feel confirmed—and trace how that information actually reached Detective Greaver. Then we turn to the physical evidence from Pizza Joe’s and the apartment where Austin was arrested. A distinctive gun. Gray shoes. Gray sweatpants. A plastic bag. Cash. Ammunition. Each piece was suspicious. But somewhere along the way, similar began becoming the same. This episode is not about pretending there was no evidence against Austin. There was. It is about separating what the evidence actually established from the complete story eventually built around it. Because repetition can sound like corroboration. A collection of similarities can start to look like identification. And when enough uncertain pieces are placed beside one another, they can begin to feel like proof. This is Part One: How the Pieces Became a Story. In Part Two, we turn the case around and look at what that story left behind.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/42353120
info_outline
Chapter Twelve: Closing Statements and a Jury's Verdict
08/04/2026
Chapter Twelve: Closing Statements and a Jury's Verdict
For nearly two weeks, the jury listened. They heard detectives explain the investigation. They heard friends accuse friends. They watched surveillance videos, examined photographs, and listened as experts tried to make sense of the evidence left behind. Now, the witnesses were gone. The evidence had been admitted. There would be no more testimony. Only two stories remained. In this episode of Wrong Ride Home: Beyond the Book, we step inside the final day of Austin Burke's trial as both sides deliver their closing arguments. The prosecution asks the jury to rely on "common sense" and connect the pieces they believe prove Austin's guilt. The defense responds with a different challenge—not to solve Brandon Sample's murder, but to decide whether the State truly proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. As the attorneys make their final appeals, twelve strangers are asked to make a decision that will forever change the lives of two families. Then, after nearly four hours of deliberation, the jury returns. The verdict is read. But for Jamie, the verdict wasn't the end of the story. It was the moment her search for answers truly began. Chapter Twelve: Closing Statements and a Jury's Verdict takes you inside the final hours of Austin Burke's trial—the arguments, the waiting, and the decision that set the course for everything that followed. Because sometimes the end of a trial... is only the beginning of the fight for the truth.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/42310325
info_outline
Chapter 11: Case Closed?
07/28/2026
Chapter 11: Case Closed?
After three days of testimony, the State rested its case. Jurors had heard from investigators, forensic experts, eyewitnesses, jailhouse witnesses, family members, and friends. They had been shown photographs, surveillance videos, phone records, and countless exhibits. By the end of the day, the prosecution argued it had proven Austin Burke was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. But was the case really closed? In this episode, we follow the final day of testimony as the state finishes its case against Austin. We will see how the defense believed that the State had not actually met its burden of proof. We also take you inside one of the trial's most important legal moments as the defense asks the judge to dismiss the charges before the case ever reaches the jury. Outside the courtroom, another story was unfolding. Families waited in the hallways, emotions ran high, and one unexpected encounter served as a reminder that behind every trial are real people whose lives will never be the same. As Chapter 11 comes to a close, one thing is certain: the testimony is over, but the questions are not.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/42238665
info_outline
Chapter Eleven: Case Closed Part One
07/21/2026
Chapter Eleven: Case Closed Part One
For the first time, the jury hears from the people who were together on the night Pizza Joe's was robbed. Friends. Witnesses who all describe the same evening—but not exactly the same way. What began as a day at Willow Lake ended inside Melanie Engle's apartment, where a group of young adults gathered after swimming. At first, their stories seem remarkably ordinary. Swimming. Friends. Searching for runaway cats. Police knocking at the door. But as the testimony unfolds, the details become far more complicated. Melanie Engle walks jurors through the timeline of that evening and the two searches of her apartment that followed. Her mother explains how a gun and ammunition were ultimately discovered—not by investigators during their initial search, but while cleaning the apartment after police had already left. Then comes one of the prosecution's most significant eyewitnesses. A man who testified he saw the robber's face from just twenty feet away under a streetlight. Yet his original description left out some of Austin's most recognizable features. In this episode, I don't ask you to decide who is right. Instead, I ask you to pay attention to the details. Because sometimes the most important testimony isn't found in what witnesses remember years later... It's found in what they wrote the very next morning. As always, I'll leave the conclusions to you. Join me as we continue following the evidence—one witness at a time.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/42161650
info_outline
Special Episode: When the Detective Took the Stand – Part Two
07/14/2026
Special Episode: When the Detective Took the Stand – Part Two
Detective John Greaver spent nearly two days on the witness stand explaining how the State built its case against Austin Burke. But every investigation must eventually face its toughest test: cross-examination. In Part Two of this special episode, we slow down and examine what Detective Greaver acknowledged when the defense began asking difficult questions. What leads were investigated... and which weren't? What evidence confirmed the State's theory... and what evidence couldn't? From Willow Lake to phone records, crime scene evidence, witness statements, and forensic testing, this episode revisits the investigation through the detective's own testimony. Along the way, we'll look at the questions that remained unanswered and the admissions that became part of the trial record. This episode isn't about second-guessing an investigation. It's about understanding it. Because in a courtroom, the search for truth doesn't end when an investigation is complete. Sometimes... it begins when the detective takes the stand.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/42066515
info_outline
Special Episode: When the Detective Took the Stand
07/07/2026
Special Episode: When the Detective Took the Stand
For the first time in this series, we're stepping away from the chapter-by-chapter format to focus on one witness whose testimony shaped nearly every part of the State's case. Detective John Greaver wasn't just another witness. He was the lead investigator. The detective who interviewed witnesses, executed search warrants, collected evidence, and ultimately built the case against Austin Burke. In this special episode, we slow down and examine Detective Greaver's testimony on its own. Rather than revisiting every witness, we'll explore how the investigation came together through the eyes of the detective leading it—and what was revealed when that investigation was tested during cross-examination. Along the way, we'll revisit key decisions, witness statements, phone records, crime scene evidence, and investigative choices that have been discussed throughout this series. We'll also look at what was confirmed, what couldn't be confirmed, and the questions that still remained after nearly two days of testimony. Whether you believe the investigation was thorough, incomplete, or somewhere in between, understanding Detective Greaver's testimony is essential to understanding this case. Because before you can understand the verdict... you have to understand the investigation.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41988085
info_outline
Chapter 10: Conflicting Stories – Part Two
06/30/2026
Chapter 10: Conflicting Stories – Part Two
The prosecution's case continues as the jury begins hearing from experts, investigators, and witnesses whose testimony was meant to strengthen the State's theory. But does the evidence actually support the stories the jury has already heard? In this episode, we examine testimony about cell phone records, firearms, DNA, and a recorded jail call. You'll also hear from Jessica Simms, whose testimony raises new questions about changing timelines, shifting memories, and how information may have spread through the same close-knit group of friends. As each witness takes the stand, a pattern begins to emerge. Some evidence confirms basic facts. Other evidence leaves important questions unanswered. And in several instances, the State's own witnesses acknowledge limitations that the jury may not have fully understood. By the end of the day, the prosecution has presented nearly every category of evidence imaginable—friends, forensic scientists, phone analysts, police officers, a jailhouse informant, and a recorded jail call. Only one witness remains. Next week, we're doing something a little different. Detective John Greaver's testimony spans more than 180 pages of the trial transcript and serves as the foundation of the State's entire case. Rather than rushing through it, we're giving his testimony an episode of its own. Before you can decide whether this investigation was thorough, flawed, or somewhere in between, you first have to understand the detective who built the case.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41902510
info_outline
Chapter Ten: Conflicting Stories - Part One
06/23/2026
Chapter Ten: Conflicting Stories - Part One
After two episodes filled with alleged confessions and conflicting witness accounts, the prosecution finally begins presenting the evidence jurors had been waiting for. In this episode, we hear from the officer who discovered Brandon Sample's abandoned Malibu, Brandon's father as he recalls the last time he saw his son alive, and Detective David Morris as he documents the recovery of Brandon's body and the investigation that followed. As the testimony unfolds, new questions begin to emerge. Where exactly was Brandon killed? Why were no shell casings recovered? What happened to surveillance footage that may have helped establish key timelines? And how much of the prosecution's case is built on evidence versus interpretation? The episode concludes with the testimony of Hayle Roupe, a young witness who claimed Austin Burke confessed to the murder. But as her testimony is examined more closely, questions arise about where information originated, how stories spread through a close-knit group of friends, and whether personal memories had become intertwined with conversations that happened afterward. For the first time in the trial, jurors begin hearing about physical evidence. The question is whether that evidence strengthens the state's case—or creates even more questions. Join me as we continue our deep dive into the trial of Austin Burke and the investigation into the death of Brandon Sample.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41739075
info_outline
Chapter Nine: Stories of Betrayal, Part Two
06/16/2026
Chapter Nine: Stories of Betrayal, Part Two
By the end of the day, the prosecution finally had what it had promised the jury during opening statements: witnesses who claimed that Austin Burke had confessed. Nathan Moats, Rickey Roupe, and Deidre Keener each took the stand and told jurors what they believed happened to Brandon Sample. The problem? Their stories didn't always match. Josh White said Brandon dropped him off around 12:30 AM. Nathan placed Brandon and Austin at Mason Street around 1:00 AM. Deidre placed Brandon with Austin again around 4:00 AM. The jury heard confessions. But they also heard conflicting timelines, evolving stories, and witnesses connected through the same social circle. This episode isn't about proving who lied. It's about asking how a jury is supposed to evaluate testimony when the people who were there that night cannot agree on what happened.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41659975
info_outline
Chapter Nine: Stories of Betrayal- Part One
06/09/2026
Chapter Nine: Stories of Betrayal- Part One
After nearly nine months of investigations, motions, media coverage, and preparation, the trial of Austin Burke finally begins. In this episode, we take a detailed look at the opening statements presented to the jury and the first witnesses called to testify. Prosecutors lay out the timeline they believe proves Austin's guilt, while the defense argues that the state still lacks the evidence needed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. You'll hear how both sides introduced the same case in dramatically different ways, the promises they made to jurors, and the evidence they claimed would support their version of events. We also examine the testimony of Josh White, one of the last people known to have seen Brandon Sample alive, along with testimony from Meredith Loges and Brittani, whose statements would become important pieces of the prosecution's narrative. As always, we'll compare the testimony to the evidence, explore inconsistencies, and ask an important question: When the trial finally began, was the jury hearing facts, assumptions, or something in between? The courtroom doors are open. The testimony has begun. And for the first time, twelve jurors are hearing the story that will determine Austin Burke's future.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41582610
info_outline
Chapter Eight: Welcome, Jury
06/02/2026
Chapter Eight: Welcome, Jury
After nine months of investigations, interviews, arrests, media coverage, and legal battles, Austin Burke's case finally reaches trial. But before a single witness testifies, before opening statements begin, and before any evidence is presented, twelve strangers are selected to decide his future. In this episode, we examine the plea offer Austin rejected, the process of jury selection, and a little-known part of many criminal trials: the jury view. Jurors left the courtroom and spent more than three hours visiting locations connected to the State's theory of the case—including the bike trail, Pizza Joe's, Melanie Engle's apartment, Austin's home, and Pamela Roupe's apartment. As I reviewed the trial transcripts, I found myself asking new questions. What happens when jurors experience a case outside the courtroom? What information was still being exchanged as the trial was beginning? And what does a "jury of your peers" really mean? This episode also steps away from the legal process to focus on the human side of trial. While attorneys prepared their cases and jurors prepared to hear evidence, Jamie Sell was preparing for something else entirely: the possibility that her son might finally come home. The investigation is over. The courtroom is ready. And the story that will decide Austin Burke's future is about to begin. Wrong Ride Home: Beyond the Book is hosted by Donna Waters and is based on her book, Wrong Ride Home.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41504510
info_outline
Chapter Seven: Loading a Trial...
05/26/2026
Chapter Seven: Loading a Trial...
Episode 11 takes listeners into the months before Austin Burke’s trial, where the pressure surrounding the case was already building long before a jury heard the first witness. In this chapter, we examine the decision to combine two separate cases into one trial, the motions filed by the defense, media influence before trial, plea agreement pressure, and the growing concern that public perception may have started shaping the outcome before opening statements ever began. This episode also explores something rarely discussed in true crime: the emotional and financial weight carried by families during criminal proceedings. From subpoena costs to media headlines to the fear of losing everything publicly, Jamie Sell found herself trying to survive a system that never seemed to slow down. As Austin moved closer to trial, the case became bigger than evidence alone. It became about narrative, pressure, fear, and the difficult question of whether fairness can truly survive once public opinion has already formed. Before a jury ever heard the evidence… was the trial already loading against him?
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41421720
info_outline
Chapter Six: Swift Judgment
05/19/2026
Chapter Six: Swift Judgment
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41345785
info_outline
Chapter Five — Stepping Into Ohio’s Judicial System (Part Two)
05/12/2026
Chapter Five — Stepping Into Ohio’s Judicial System (Part Two)
Episode 9 dives deeper into the investigation that continued long after Austin Burke was already sitting in jail. In Chapter Five: Stepping into Ohio’s Judicial System — Part Two, we examine the witness interviews, shifting timelines, and growing inconsistencies that continued unfolding behind the scenes in late June of 2017. This episode explores: Rickey Roupe’s recorded interview and the detailed allegations that followed the chaotic atmosphere surrounding witness statements social media contamination and public pressure Taylor Dunn and Nathan Moats’ interviews the overlooked Burger King surveillance video connected to Nick Geott’s timeline Cody Snyder’s interview and the Facebook messages that complicated the state’s timeline and the psychological pressure that can emerge during police interviews and interrogations As detectives continued building their case, major questions still remained: timelines were still shifting witness statements continued evolving and physical evidence was still missing Yet the system continued moving forward. More than 3,200 days later, Austin Burke remains behind bars. This episode is not just about what investigators believed happened. It’s about how investigations evolve, how narratives form, and what can happen when an arrest comes before the full picture is clear. Wrong Ride Home is available on Amazon in hardback, paperback, and e-book.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41261115
info_outline
Chapter Five — Stepping Into Ohio’s Judicial System (Part One)
05/05/2026
Chapter Five — Stepping Into Ohio’s Judicial System (Part One)
This is the moment everything changes. Up until now, this case has been about questions—timelines, witness statements, and what may or may not have happened. But in Episode 8, the system steps in. And once it does… it doesn’t stop. Within 72 hours of Austin Burke’s arrest, the legal process begins. Hearings are scheduled. Decisions are made. And a case starts moving forward—despite one critical problem: There still isn’t physical evidence tying Austin to the murder of Brandon Sample. In this episode, we break down what happens when the system begins before the case is fully built. We walk through: Austin’s arraignment and the confusion surrounding the warrant The reality of how quickly the court process moves A return to the crime scene… eight days later Surveillance footage from Pizza Joe’s—and what it shows, and what it doesn’t Missing camera angles and unanswered questions A witness statement that introduces two suspicious men… who never appear in the footage And an interview that raises a bigger concern—when does questioning stop being neutral? Because at some point… something shifts. The focus moves away from finding answers… and toward building a narrative. And by the end of this episode, one thing becomes clear: They didn’t have evidence. But they were getting closer to something else. Part Two will take you inside the statement that changed everything.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41153515
info_outline
Chapter Four: Arrested — Guilty Until Proven Innocent
04/28/2026
Chapter Four: Arrested — Guilty Until Proven Innocent
Chapter Four: Arrested — Guilty Until Proven Innocent What happens after the arrest… is where everything really begins. In this episode, we step inside June 21, 2017—the day Austin Burke wakes up in a jail cell and his life changes in ways he couldn’t have imagined. But this isn’t just about an arrest. It’s about what happens when a narrative starts forming before the full story is told. You’ll hear how investigators handled the case in those early hours—what they focused on, what they didn’t, and the questions that still don’t have answers. We break down the evidence that looked strong… but didn’t actually connect. The leads that were followed… and the ones that weren’t. And how quickly public perception can shift when information is presented a certain way. For the first time, you’ll also hear from Austin’s family— Gage, his brother— as they try to make sense of what was happening in real time. Because while the investigation was moving forward… his family was trying to understand how everything unraveled so fast. This episode isn’t about proving what happened. It’s about asking a harder question: What happens when the system starts moving… before the truth has a chance to catch up?
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/41043670
info_outline
Chapter Three: In Pursuit of a Warrant- Part 2
04/21/2026
Chapter Three: In Pursuit of a Warrant- Part 2
We’re back inside the investigation—and this is where things start to shift. In this episode, we take a closer look at the statements that helped build the case. Not just what was said, but how those statements changed… and how they line up against each other. Because when you slow it all down, the timeline doesn’t just bend—it starts to break. You’ll hear about Deidre’s account and where it fits… or doesn’t. We revisit what was said about that night, who was supposedly where, and what was claimed to happen next. And when you lay those details side by side, the gaps become harder to ignore. We also step into something bigger—the idea of probable cause. What it actually means under the law, and what it’s supposed to require before a warrant is signed. Then we hold that standard up against what investigators had at the time. This episode isn’t about deciding guilt or innocence. It’s about asking better questions. It’s about looking at the foundation of a case and asking—does it hold? Because when statements conflict, timelines shift, and key details rely on hearsay… that matters. And it should matter to all of us. This is Wrong Ride Home: Beyond the Book.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/40952775
info_outline
Hatchet Man Road: The Legend, the Location, and the Lead That Wasn’t Followed (Ohio True Crime)
04/14/2026
Hatchet Man Road: The Legend, the Location, and the Lead That Wasn’t Followed (Ohio True Crime)
Hatchet Man Road. If you’ve heard of it, you probably already have a version of the story. A road in Trumbull County. A house in the woods. A man with a hatchet. But depending on who you ask… the details don’t stay the same. In this special episode, we step away from the timeline—just for a moment—to take a closer look at something that keeps coming up in this case: Hatchet Man Road. What is it, really? Where did the story come from? And why was it treated the way it was when it became part of a real investigation? Because the more you look into it, the more it becomes clear— this isn’t just one location. It’s a story that exists in multiple places. A legend that moves. And a name that people recognize… even when they don’t fully understand it. And that matters. Because when something like that becomes a lead— in a case where time matters— how it’s handled can change everything. This episode isn’t about proving the legend. It’s about understanding how it became real enough to influence a real investigation. And what happens when something that feels familiar… isn’t actually clear at all. Just like Hatchet Man Road— it seems like everyone has their own version of the truth. And we’re starting to see that same pattern in this case.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/40866295
info_outline
Chapter Three: In Pursuit of a Warrant Part One
04/07/2026
Chapter Three: In Pursuit of a Warrant Part One
This is where everything shifts. What started as a missing person case is now a homicide—and instead of slowing down to build a full timeline, the investigation begins to take direction. In this episode, I walk through the first major witness interview with Josh White—the person who said he was one of the last to see Brandon alive. At first, his story sounds clear. Detailed. Complete. But when you slow it down… there are gaps. Phone records that don’t quite line up. Details that weren’t followed up on. And moments that raise more questions than answers. This isn’t about pointing fingers. It’s about asking what should have been asked—when it mattered most. Because from this point on, the investigation doesn’t just follow evidence. It starts to follow a narrative.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/40755015
info_outline
Chapter Two: The First 48 Hours
03/31/2026
Chapter Two: The First 48 Hours
Episode 3 takes us into the first 48 hours of Brandon Sample’s disappearance — the hours that should have mattered most. What starts as an abandoned car on a bike trail quickly turns into something much more complicated. A missing person report. Conflicting statements. Tips that don’t quite line up. And decisions that begin shaping the direction of the case almost immediately. As the investigation unfolds, questions start to surface: What was followed up on… and what wasn’t? Who was talked to… and who wasn’t? And how much of the story was built before the evidence was ever fully understood? This episode isn’t about what we know now. It’s about what happened then — when time was critical, and every decision mattered. Because sometimes, the first 48 hours don’t just start an investigation… they define it.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/40677975
info_outline
Chapter One: Wrong Ride Home
03/24/2026
Chapter One: Wrong Ride Home
Episode 2: Chapter One — Wrong Ride Home Before there was an arrest… there was a normal day. In this episode, we slow everything down and go back to where this story really begins—June 11, 2017. A family outing. A simple decision. A ride that, at the time, didn’t seem like it mattered. But it did. We walk through Austin’s timeline—his movements, his messages, and the moments that would later be questioned, reinterpreted, and, in some cases, ignored. This isn’t speculation. It’s a closer look at what actually happened… and what may have been missed. Because when you take the time to really sit with the details, a different picture starts to form. And if that picture is accurate… then the foundation of this case becomes much harder to ignore.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/40608175
info_outline
Finding Our Voices Together
03/17/2026
Finding Our Voices Together
Before the story unfolds, there’s a moment where everything is quiet—and you have to decide if you’re ready to speak. In this first episode of Wrong Ride Home: Beyond the Book, Donna Waters opens the door to the journey ahead, not just as a storyteller, but as someone still learning how to carry a story that never really let her go. This isn’t about jumping straight into facts or timelines. It’s about finding the courage to revisit something heavy… and choosing to do it out loud. Donna reflects on where this story began for her, what it means to give it a voice now, and why telling it—again, differently—still matters. Because sometimes, finding your voice isn’t something you do alone. Sometimes, you find it together.
/episode/index/show/e7cdaf32-5427-4698-8397-10440a20b6da/id/40519235