Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
Live over the airwaves Salem Radio that is a Q&A related to personal protection, the 2nd amendment, guns, the shooting sports industry. Recorded live on SALEM at 5:00 pm est. Listen to the Podcasts, catch us live, or email in your questions to be covered on the next show. Radio@Targething.com. Our discussions include guns, pepper spray, defensive techniques, concealed carry, NRA, firearms, safety and a variety of others as the show is led by the originating topic and the questions asked by our listeners. Amanda Suffecool, Rob Campbell work to make the show lively and topical. Enjoy - Amanda
info_outline
71926 hr2
07/20/2026
71926 hr2
The discussion begins with concerns about government surveillance and privacy, centering on a credit card merchant category code created for firearm-related purchases. Hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell argue that even if current officials choose not to enforce such tracking, future administrations could use the information to monitor lawful gun owners. They express concern that records of firearm purchases, training, range memberships, and related spending could be compiled into government databases, emphasizing that the existence of such laws or tracking mechanisms creates long-term privacy risks regardless of who currently holds office. The hosts broaden the conversation by discussing government authority during emergencies, using the Boston Marathon bombing manhunt as an example. They criticize the suspension of cellular service and warrantless neighborhood searches, arguing that measures justified as being "for your own good" can become dangerous precedents that erode constitutional rights. They compare these actions to intrusive homeowners associations and caution that temporary emergency powers can normalize government overreach into citizens' private lives. Later, Amanda and Rob examine the Firearms Policy Coalition lawsuit challenging the prohibition on carrying firearms inside U.S. post offices. They explain that the Department of Justice recently chose not to continue appealing a favorable lower-court ruling, leaving questions about whether the decision protects only members of specific gun-rights organizations or applies more broadly. The hosts also discuss the historical origins of post office firearm restrictions, the phrase "going postal," and how past criminal acts often resulted in laws that primarily affect law-abiding gun owners rather than criminals. They view the case as another indication that courts are increasingly siding with Second Amendment advocates. The program then turns to the Supreme Court's decision to hear two AR-15 cases, prompting a discussion of Virginia's legal arguments that AR-15-style rifles are not constitutionally protected because they are supposedly "unusual." Amanda and Rob strongly disagree, noting that tens of millions of AR-15s are owned throughout the United States and that even Supreme Court justices have previously acknowledged the rifle's widespread popularity. They argue that the firearm clearly meets the legal standard of being in common use for lawful purposes and criticize continued attempts by states to restrict it despite existing precedent. The hosts also reflect on cosmetic differences between firearms, joking about ornate engravings, wooden stocks, and customized rifles while emphasizing that appearance has little bearing on constitutional protections. In the final segment, the conversation shifts to ongoing challenges against the National Firearms Act and other firearm regulations. Amanda and Rob express optimism that recent court decisions and the elimination of the NFA's $200 tax stamp for certain items will ultimately lead to suppressors and short-barreled rifles being removed from NFA regulation altogether. They also discuss a new lawsuit challenging Illinois' 72-hour waiting period for firearm purchases, arguing that such delays have no historical basis under the Supreme Court's Bruen framework and can leave individuals defenseless when facing immediate threats. The episode concludes with the hosts expressing confidence that Second Amendment litigation is steadily moving in favor of gun-rights advocates and that additional legal victories are likely in the coming years.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/42147080
info_outline
71926 hr1
07/20/2026
71926 hr1
The episode opens with hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell chatting about the unusually hot weather and smoky conditions affecting much of the United States before recognizing July 19 as the birthday of Samuel Colt. That leads into an extended discussion of Colt’s contributions to firearms history, including his early percussion revolvers, the popular pocket models, and the evolution of loading mechanisms and cartridge firearms. Rob explains the origins of several historic firearm designs and patents, including the so-called “King’s Patent,” while the hosts reflect on how many important inventors have been forgotten despite shaping modern firearms. The conversation then shifts to current Second Amendment issues, with the hosts arguing that gun-rights supporters have steadily regained legal ground since the expiration of the 1994 federal assault weapons ban and especially following the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision. They discuss the recent Wolford case involving Hawaii’s restrictions on carrying firearms in so-called sensitive places and criticize efforts by gun-control advocates to distribute "gun-free zone" signs to businesses after losing in court. Amanda and Rob argue that many concealed carriers choose where to spend their money based on whether businesses welcome lawful firearm owners, sharing personal stories about refusing to patronize businesses displaying gun prohibition signs. A significant portion of the program focuses on politics and voter participation. The hosts stress that elections have major consequences for firearm policy and encourage listeners to verify their voter registration, participate in elections, and persuade other gun owners and sportsmen to vote. They discuss competitive congressional districts, particularly in Ohio, argue that voter apathy is a greater threat than opposition, and highlight efforts by organizations to mobilize hunters and firearm owners ahead of upcoming elections. Along the way, they also mention a newly introduced short-barreled M1 Carbine from Magnum Research and preview an upcoming visit to the Tommy Gun warehouse. Later, Amanda and Rob praise what they see as renewed public engagement by the NRA, particularly its legal strategy and increased communication regarding lawsuits and Second Amendment advocacy. They describe the challenge of keeping up with the constant stream of firearms-related news and explain how they sift through legal developments to identify the most important stories for their audience. The hosts close by discussing proposals to expand, or "pack," the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that adding justices could influence constitutional rulings for decades because modern justices tend to serve much longer than in the past. They contend that the composition of the Court, together with voter participation, will have long-lasting effects on Second Amendment rights and broader constitutional issues, emphasizing that civic engagement remains essential.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/42147065
info_outline
71226 hr2
07/13/2026
71226 hr2
The program centers on an extended interview with attorney Alan Beck following his successful argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in the Wolford case, which challenged Hawaii's restrictive concealed-carry laws. Beck explains that after the Supreme Court's Bruen decision expanded concealed carry rights, Hawaii and several other states responded by enacting laws that effectively made permits useless by designating most public locations as off-limits. A major focus of the case was Hawaii's so-called "vampire rule," which required concealed carriers to obtain affirmative permission before entering any private business open to the public while armed. Beck describes how the rule created impossible situations, such as requiring permission before pulling into a gas station parking lot at night, and argues that businesses were unfairly forced into political debates by having to post signs either allowing or prohibiting firearms. Amanda and Beck compare the restriction to requiring permission to exercise other constitutional rights, emphasizing why the Supreme Court ultimately struck down the law. The discussion broadens into Hawaii's unique legal and historical background, with Beck explaining that the state's restrictive firearm policies partly stem from its history as an independent monarchy before statehood. He describes the Wolford victory as the culmination of fifteen years of litigation aimed at restoring Second Amendment rights in Hawaii, noting that the ruling gives concealed carry permits practical value while signaling to the state that future constitutional challenges can and will reach the Supreme Court if necessary. Looking ahead, Beck predicts that the Court is likely to strike down bans on AR-15 rifles in states such as Illinois and Connecticut, arguing that the justices accepted those cases because they believe lower courts have misapplied the Second Amendment. He also identifies the next major constitutional battleground as defining what qualifies as a legitimate "sensitive place" where firearms may be restricted. After the interview, hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell shift to federal firearms regulation and discuss what they view as a changing relationship between the firearms community and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). They examine proposed revisions to the federal firearms license (FFL) transfer process, explaining that the agency withdrew a proposed rule not because it intended to become more restrictive, but because industry feedback suggested improvements to the language before implementation. The hosts describe this as an example of regulators working collaboratively with firearms dealers to modernize electronic recordkeeping and streamline lawful transfers, while acknowledging that firearm owners in more restrictive states continue to face far greater regulatory burdens than those in states like Ohio. The conversation then turns to state-level legal battles, including a Florida case involving firearm preemption laws. The hosts discuss a county fair that attempted to prohibit lawful firearm carry despite state law protecting it, noting that the courts sided with the citizens and required the county to pay legal costs. Amanda views the ruling as another victory for state preemption laws, while Rob argues that meaningful accountability is still lacking because the public ultimately pays for unsuccessful legal challenges rather than the officials responsible for pursuing them. Their differing perspectives highlight the tension between celebrating courtroom victories and seeking stronger consequences for government officials who knowingly enact policies that violate existing law. In the final segment, Amanda and Rob discuss how they believe gun-control advocacy organizations are changing their political strategy. Rather than focusing solely on outright firearm bans, they argue that many groups are increasingly framing proposals as public health or violence-prevention initiatives and embedding firearm-related provisions within larger budget bills to increase their chances of passage. They also discuss activist organizations that train members in skills such as de-escalation, emergency medical care, firearm safety, self-defense, and crowd management. Rob argues that understanding how organized groups coordinate and direct large crowds is an often-overlooked but valuable skill, while Amanda emphasizes that recognizing these organizational techniques can help people better understand public demonstrations and social movements. The episode concludes with encouragement for listeners to remain engaged, continue following legislative developments, and stay informed as legal and political debates surrounding the Second Amendment continue to evolve.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/42052315
info_outline
71226 hr1
07/13/2026
71226 hr1
The episode opens with Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussing creative home design, prompted by a conversation about a friend receiving an antique artillery-model Luger pistol. That leads into an extended discussion about designing concealed gun rooms and secure storage areas within a home. They explore ideas such as hidden safe rooms behind Murphy doors or disguised entrances, the advantages and shortcomings of commercial vault doors, structural security beyond simply installing a heavy door, emergency exits, ventilation, and balancing accessibility with secrecy. They also compare how differently people perceive and remember house layouts, joking that while some people could never recognize a hidden room, others instinctively map every space they enter. The conversation then shifts to major Second Amendment litigation. Amanda previews an interview with attorney Alan Beck regarding the recent Supreme Court decision in the Wolford v. Lopez case involving Hawaii's "sensitive places" restrictions. The hosts discuss how states such as New Jersey and Chicago are already attempting to preserve their own gun-free zone laws despite the ruling, arguing that many states continue relying on historical laws from the late 1800s instead of the Founding Era history required under the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. They review the progression from Heller to McDonald to Bruen, arguing that Bruen finally forced lower courts to take the Second Amendment more seriously after years of resistance. From there, Rob and Amanda speculate about the future of National Firearms Act (NFA) regulations. They express optimism that restrictions on machine guns, suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and shotguns will continue to be challenged in court, discussing the possibility that future purchases could require only a standard background check rather than tax stamps or extensive paperwork. They also examine practical issues surrounding registered NFA firearms, including inheritance, lost registration records, and the complications owners face decades after purchasing regulated items. Another segment focuses on an unusual diplomatic story from the recent NATO summit in Turkey. The hosts describe how Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan reportedly presented engraved .357 Magnum revolvers, complete with ammunition and cleaning kits, to attending world leaders as commemorative gifts. They discuss Turkey's growing firearms industry, the quality of Turkish-made firearms, and the diplomatic complications created by presenting handguns to leaders from countries where civilian handgun ownership is heavily restricted. They humorously review how various leaders handled the gifts, with some placing them in museums, some dealing with customs issues, and others having the firearms deactivated to comply with their domestic laws. The discussion expands into the long tradition of political figures and dignitaries exchanging commemorative firearms as gifts. The final portion of the program returns to current legal developments surrounding the Second Amendment. Amanda and Rob discuss California's new restrictions on Glock-style handguns, the Department of Justice's legal challenge to those laws, and their expectation that additional Supreme Court cases will continue expanding protections recognized under Bruen. They also touch on ongoing litigation involving AR-15s, age-based firearm restrictions, state efforts to resist recent court rulings, and the broader trend of increasing legal victories for gun-rights advocates. The episode concludes with broader reflections on firearm imports, inexpensive ammunition, historical rimfire cartridges, and the possibility that future legal challenges could eventually remove longstanding import restrictions and encourage innovation within the firearms industry.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/42052310
info_outline
70526 hr2
07/06/2026
70526 hr2
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio focuses on several current issues affecting gun owners, firearms regulation, and Second Amendment advocacy. The hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell begin by discussing a provision in New York's 2027 state budget that requires 3D printers and other computer-controlled manufacturing equipment to include technology capable of detecting and blocking files used to produce firearms or firearm components. They argue that the legislation extends far beyond hobbyist 3D printers, potentially affecting CNC machines, industrial manufacturing equipment, and countless businesses that rely on computer-controlled machining. The hosts question how such a system could realistically distinguish lawful manufacturing from prohibited activity, contend that the requirement raises constitutional concerns involving the First, Fourth, and Second Amendments, and suggest it could discourage manufacturing investment in New York while further accelerating business departures from the state. The discussion then shifts to legal and political developments surrounding firearms terminology and federal regulation. The hosts reference comments attributed to Justice Clarence Thomas regarding the historical emergence of the term "assault weapon," arguing that the phrase originated as a political rather than technical term. They discuss how language influences public opinion and compare it to other politically charged terminology. Attention then turns to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), where the hosts note what they view as a more favorable stance toward gun owners under the agency's current leadership. They criticize previous ATF enforcement practices against federally licensed firearms dealers over paperwork errors and discuss a newly proposed ATF rule concerning the National Firearms Act (NFA). Listeners are encouraged to participate in the public comment period, while the hosts speculate that suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns may eventually be removed from NFA regulation, though they acknowledge that certain highly destructive weapons may continue to warrant separate regulation. Later in the program, the hosts examine a report criticizing Everytown for Gun Safety, describing allegations that the organization reused older reports, relied heavily on self-referential citations, and selectively presented data to support its conclusions about so-called "assault weapons." They then discuss a recent case involving firearms stolen from checked airline luggage at Portland International Airport, where an Apple AirTag reportedly helped authorities locate a baggage handler accused of stealing multiple firearms. The hosts use the incident to encourage travelers to place tracking devices inside locked firearm cases when flying. The show concludes on a positive note by recognizing Sharnetta Sams, a firearms instructor, engineer, and leader within A Girl & A Gun, who was featured prominently in the Baltimore Sun for her work promoting firearms education and responsible gun ownership. Throughout the episode, the hosts intersperse sponsor messages and public service announcements promoting firearm safety, secure storage, self-defense training, and Second Amendment educational organizations.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41969680
info_outline
70526 hr1
07/06/2026
70526 hr1
The episode opens with Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussing recent developments affecting Second Amendment issues, beginning with lighthearted conversation before turning to major legal news. They explain that recent Supreme Court decisions, particularly the Wolford case and the marijuana-related ruling, are expected to have broad implications for firearms law, including potential revisions to federal firearm purchase forms and future court challenges. Looking ahead, they highlight the Supreme Court's decision to hear Grant v. Lamont, a challenge involving Connecticut's AR-15 ban, which they describe as one of the most significant Second Amendment cases since the Bruen decision. The hosts emphasize the years of work by advocacy organizations, particularly praising Holly Sullivan of the Connecticut Citizens Defense League for her leadership in advancing the case and arguing that its outcome could reshape how courts view commonly owned firearms nationwide. The discussion then shifts to ongoing federal and state policy battles. Amanda and Rob examine reports surrounding possible changes to federal firearm purchasing procedures, including speculation about proposals that would allow licensed dealers to ship firearms directly to buyers' homes after background checks. While they note widespread media attention surrounding Donald Trump Jr.'s investment in the online retailer GrabAGun, they stress that many reported details remain speculative and encourage listeners to monitor official ATF announcements rather than relying on rumors. They also compare firearm purchasing requirements with voting identification debates, arguing that government standards for identity verification should be applied consistently across different rights. A major portion of the program focuses on actions taken by the U.S. Department of Justice under Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon. The hosts describe lawsuits challenging firearm restrictions in both Virginia and California, arguing that the DOJ is actively contesting state laws it believes violate constitutional protections. They discuss California's handgun roster, restrictions affecting Glock-style pistols, and broader legal arguments concerning the Second Amendment under the Bruen framework. According to the hosts, California's refusal to modify its regulations prompted broader federal litigation that now challenges multiple aspects of the state's firearm laws rather than a single policy. The conversation also examines Virginia's recently enacted gun control measures. Amanda and Rob describe how the DOJ sought to halt implementation of several new restrictions, including bans affecting commonly owned firearms, and note that some provisions have already been delayed or temporarily blocked by courts. They explain that the ATF accelerated processing of firearm-related applications for Virginia residents before new restrictions took effect and discuss how lawsuits, injunctions, legislative amendments, and differing enforcement decisions by local officials have created legal uncertainty throughout the state. Throughout the discussion, they argue that ongoing litigation will ultimately determine the constitutionality of these measures. Toward the end of the episode, the hosts broaden the discussion to emerging legislative trends in other states, particularly New York, where proposed regulations involving 3D printers and CNC machines are described as another front in the broader debate over so-called "ghost guns." They caution listeners that many firearm-related policy changes are being incorporated into larger budget bills and encourage gun owners to remain informed about legislation in their own states. The episode concludes by emphasizing that the legal landscape surrounding firearm rights is changing rapidly, with multiple high-profile lawsuits, Supreme Court cases, and Department of Justice actions likely to shape Second Amendment law for years to come.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41969650
info_outline
62826 hr2
06/29/2026
62826 hr2
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio begins with Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell reflecting on the show's origins as a firearms call-in program and discussing Rob's long-standing interest in collecting and researching historic firearms. Rob shares stories from gun auctions, explaining how specialized knowledge and reference books can help collectors identify rare firearms and avoid costly mistakes. The conversation then shifts to national politics, where they discuss President Donald Trump's recent remarks supporting nationwide right-to-carry legislation. The hosts argue that constitutional rights should not end at state borders and criticize media coverage and opponents who claim expanded concealed carry would lead to increased violence. They contend that decades of concealed carry experience across many states have not produced the widespread violence critics predicted and compare the United States' approach to firearms with the United Kingdom's strict gun control policies and historical disarmament before World War II. Later in the program, Amanda and Rob revisit ongoing legal challenges to firearm restrictions affecting adults between the ages of 18 and 20. They explain how lawsuits in states such as Missouri, Florida, West Virginia, Ohio, and California have been slowed by lengthy court delays, sometimes allowing plaintiffs to "age out" of eligibility before their cases are decided. The hosts argue that these procedural delays effectively deny constitutional rights and discuss the importance of timely judicial review. They also highlight a newly introduced AR-15 from One Horse Firearms that comes factory-equipped with a forced reset trigger, suggesting that factory-installed components may offer legal and reliability advantages over aftermarket modifications. The final portion of the show centers on the realities and legal consequences of armed self-defense. Amanda and Rob stress that carrying a firearm is intended for protecting oneself in life-threatening situations rather than acting as a hero. They revisit several self-defense incidents, including a Michigan case in which a man spent months in jail after using his firearm during a violent assault despite surveillance footage supporting his actions, and another case involving a concealed carry permit holder who intervened when a man armed with an axe threatened others. These stories serve to illustrate the legal scrutiny that often follows defensive gun use, even when it appears justified. The hosts also criticize what they view as activist judges and politically motivated prosecutions that discourage lawful self-defense. The episode concludes with a discussion of congressional investigations into the former White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention and its alleged relationships with gun-control advocacy organizations. Amanda and Rob argue that these investigations are necessary to determine whether government resources were improperly used to support anti-gun initiatives and express hope that officials found to have acted improperly will be held accountable. They also discuss broader concerns about government spending, enforcement priorities, and regulatory agencies before ending on a patriotic note, encouraging listeners to celebrate the Fourth of July and America's 250th birthday while looking forward to future discussions on Second Amendment issues. Throughout the broadcast, the program includes recurring advertisements and public service announcements promoting firearms safety, training opportunities, educational organizations, and products for responsible firearm ownership.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41900070
info_outline
62826 hr1
06/29/2026
62826 hr1
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio focuses on several recent Second Amendment developments, particularly major U.S. Supreme Court decisions and their broader legal implications. Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss the Court's unanimous decision in the Hermani case involving marijuana users and firearm rights, arguing that the ruling reinforces constitutional protections while potentially undermining red flag laws by emphasizing due process before constitutional rights can be restricted. They also revisit the Bruen standard of evaluating firearm laws based on the nation's historical tradition, criticizing attempts by some judges and legal commentators to weaken that framework. The hosts examine the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling in the Wolford case from Hawaii, which struck down the state's requirement that private property owners explicitly grant permission before lawful concealed carriers could enter. They explain that the Court instead held that carrying is presumed lawful unless a property owner specifically prohibits firearms, viewing the decision as another significant expansion of Second Amendment protections. The conversation also explores reactions to the Court's rulings, including criticism from dissenting justices and media commentators who relied on post-Civil War laws—particularly discriminatory Black Codes—to support their arguments. Amanda and Rob argue that such laws should not be considered valid historical precedent under the Bruen test and contend that the Second Amendment protects all Americans equally regardless of race. They discuss how incremental court victories can gradually expand nationwide rights through continued litigation and stress the importance of appellate review so favorable decisions apply beyond a single judicial circuit. Throughout the show, they express optimism that recent Supreme Court decisions will continue reshaping firearm law in favor of broader constitutional protections. Later in the program, the hosts shift to ongoing litigation in California, praising Justice Department official Harmeet Dhillon for challenging the state's proposed restrictions on Glock pistols and its longstanding handgun roster. They explain that multiple lawsuits are targeting California's firearm regulations and criticize the slow pace of the courts, noting that one handgun roster case has remained undecided for more than 1,100 days after oral arguments. The discussion concludes with California's legal battle over firearm restrictions for adults aged 18 to 20. Amanda and Rob argue that if 18-year-olds are legally recognized as adults for contracts, military service, and criminal responsibility, they should likewise enjoy full Second Amendment rights. As in most episodes, the legal discussions are interspersed with advertisements and public service announcements promoting firearms safety, training opportunities, educational organizations, and products related to responsible firearm ownership.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41900020
info_outline
62126 hr2
06/22/2026
62126 hr2
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio opens with Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussing the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Rahimi and its implications for firearm ownership by marijuana users. Amanda argues that the ruling represents a significant constitutional development because it challenges the long-standing practice of broadly denying firearm rights to individuals based solely on marijuana use. The hosts discuss the practical difficulties of determining impairment, noting that alcohol intoxication can be measured in real time while marijuana testing often detects prior use rather than current impairment. Amanda believes the ruling could have broader implications beyond firearms, potentially affecting workplace drug testing, employment policies, and other constitutional-rights questions where governments or employers rely on evidence of past drug use rather than present impairment. The discussion also explores whether similar legal reasoning could eventually influence restrictions on firearm possession by individuals who have consumed alcohol but are not currently impaired. The hosts then examine the broader constitutional arguments surrounding the decision. Amanda quotes a statement from Women for Gun Rights, which compares the treatment of marijuana users to the public demonization of AR-15 rifles. The argument presented is that constitutional rights should not be restricted based on political narratives or generalized assumptions about danger. Amanda and Rob speculate that future litigation will be necessary to define the practical limits of the ruling, especially regarding impairment standards and how government agencies enforce existing firearm prohibitions. A related issue emerges when Amanda discusses the case of a mother whose child brought a firearm to school and shot a teacher. According to the hosts, one of the charges against the mother stemmed from allegedly lying about marijuana use on a federal firearms purchase form. Amanda wonders how cases like that may be affected if firearm-purchase questions regarding marijuana use are eventually changed or removed. The hosts predict that courts will continue addressing the legal consequences of past prosecutions that relied on those provisions. After a series of sponsor messages and public-service announcements, the conversation shifts to a lawsuit challenging Michigan’s firearm licensing and registration requirements. Amanda explains that Michigan requires individuals to obtain government approval before purchasing certain firearms and that records associated with the process effectively create a registry. She argues that such systems conflict with federal policies intended to prevent the creation of national gun registries. Rob questions where the line should be drawn between state authority and federal constitutional protections. Amanda supports legal challenges brought by the NRA, contending that constitutional rights should not vary dramatically from state to state. The hosts discuss concerns that multiple state-level registration systems could eventually be combined into a larger database, even if no formal national registry exists. The discussion expands to include criticism of proposals to repeal restrictions on federal firearm registries. Amanda expresses concern that removing federal barriers could lead to centralized databases tracking firearm ownership nationwide. The hosts debate how firearm records are maintained, joking about the enormous quantity of paper records generated by firearm transactions over decades and questioning the practicality of managing and preserving such information indefinitely. Later in the program, Amanda turns to California, highlighting restrictions imposed by officials in Contra Costa County on concealed-carry permit holders. According to the discussion, local authorities have attempted to limit the types of handguns and accessories that permit holders may carry, including restrictions involving single-action handguns and certain firearm accessories. Amanda argues that these policies conflict with the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision because she sees no historical precedent for such limitations. She praises the efforts of the Second Amendment Foundation in challenging these restrictions through litigation and encourages listeners to support organizations involved in Second Amendment legal battles. The hosts then discuss a Florida case involving several teenagers carrying firearms while riding bicycles, one of whom died after being shot. Amanda uses the story to argue that additional firearm regulations often fail to stop individuals who are already violating existing laws. The conversation broadens into a lighthearted exchange about education, mathematics, engineering, and metallurgy. Amanda reflects on technical subjects she learned years earlier and jokes that some seemingly obscure engineering concepts have proven more useful in her life than portions of her formal mathematics education. Returning to self-defense topics, Amanda describes an incident in Massachusetts where both a civilian and a state trooper intervened during a violent encounter. The civilian reportedly exhausted the ammunition he was legally permitted to carry under state restrictions before the threat was fully neutralized. Amanda uses the incident to criticize magazine-capacity limits and other firearm restrictions, arguing that such laws may place law-abiding citizens at a disadvantage during emergencies. The final major segment focuses on a self-defense story involving a woman in Alaska who was attacked by a bear while gathering mushrooms. Amanda recounts how the woman, carrying a compact Glock 43 pistol, encountered a bear that had attacked one of her dogs. The bear charged at close range, and the woman fired multiple shots with her small 9mm handgun. According to the story, the bear eventually retreated, allowing the woman and her dogs to escape. Amanda emphasizes how remarkable the encounter was, noting that many people would consider the firearm underpowered for bear defense. The hosts conclude that the woman’s preparedness likely saved her life and discuss the broader importance of carrying effective defensive tools when traveling in remote wilderness areas. The episode closes with a lighter discussion about the growing popularity of toy guns, dart blasters, and similar products. Amanda and Rob compare modern toy guns with the cap guns and cowboy-themed toys of their childhoods. They lament that contemporary toy-gun designs often resemble science-fiction props rather than realistic western-style toys and speculate that children’s interest in toy firearms may eventually translate into interest in recreational shooting and firearms education later in life. The conversation ends on a nostalgic note as Amanda recalls dressing up with toy holsters and cap guns as a child,
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41719375
info_outline
62126 hr1
06/22/2026
62126 hr1
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio begins with Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussing their experience at GunCon 2026 in Niles, Ohio. They describe the event as a well-organized gathering that combines media access, vendor demonstrations, VIP experiences, and public attendance. The hosts were impressed by the large turnout and the opportunity attendees had to interact directly with firearms industry personalities, content creators, and manufacturers. A major highlight was an appearance by Vivek Ramaswamy, who answered Second Amendment-related questions from attendees. Amanda and Rob praised him for providing detailed answers rather than political talking points. They specifically noted his rejection of government-funded or government-mandated firearms training programs, arguing that private organizations and existing industry programs are better suited to provide firearms education. The discussion then turns to the firearms community's culture of mentorship. Amanda argues that experienced gun owners are often eager to introduce newcomers to shooting sports, frequently volunteering their time, equipment, ammunition, and expertise to help others learn safely. The hosts contrast this welcoming attitude with the misconception that firearms ownership requires extensive formal government involvement. They emphasize that most gun owners are enthusiastic about sharing knowledge and encouraging responsible participation in the shooting community. Moving back to GunCon, Amanda and Rob describe the appeal of the event as a place where attendees can meet online personalities and firearms reviewers they normally only see through YouTube, social media, or podcasts. They mention several well-known content creators and discuss some of the more interesting firearms and products they encountered. Among the highlights were a suppressed M1 Carbine that impressed them with its quiet operation and handling characteristics, as well as an unusual knife-gun combination that incorporated a small revolver into the handle of a folding knife. They found the design novel and intriguing, although they acknowledged that it raised practical questions about usability and accuracy. After several sponsor and public service announcements, the hosts transition into a discussion of firearm restrictions imposed by homeowners associations. Amanda references a Florida HOA that attempted to ban firearms before backing down following pressure from state officials. She then discusses a South Carolina HOA that implemented restrictions on firearms in common areas, including pools, clubhouses, sidewalks, and parking lots. The hosts criticize the policy as impractical because residents would effectively be unable to transport firearms between their homes and vehicles. Amanda argues that HOA leadership can significantly influence community policies and encourages gun owners living in such communities to become involved in HOA governance. Both hosts contend that firearm bans create an environment that may attract criminals by signaling that residents are unlikely to be armed. The program next examines recent developments concerning concealed carry rights for adults aged 18 to 20. Amanda explains that many states still impose restrictions on younger adults despite recognizing them as legal adults for numerous other purposes. She highlights actions in Florida and West Virginia that expand carry rights for individuals in this age group. Florida’s legal developments involve court rulings finding restrictions unconstitutional, while West Virginia lowered the age requirement for permitless concealed carry from 21 to 18. Amanda views these developments as further extensions of the legal reasoning established after the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision and argues that constitutional rights should apply equally to adults regardless of whether they are 18 or 21 years old. The conversation then shifts to concerns about artificial intelligence and the reliability of information generated by AI systems. Amanda recounts examples discussed within the firearms media community in which AI-generated research allegedly produced inaccurate or fabricated information. She argues that AI-generated summaries should always be verified through original sources and cites a story involving firearms journalist Mark Walters as an example of why users should not automatically trust AI outputs. Drawing on her engineering background, Amanda compares reviewing AI-generated information to reviewing work produced by a new employee: the results may appear convincing but still require careful verification and critical thinking. Later in the episode, the hosts discuss what they view as a series of legislative proposals from gun-control advocates. Amanda argues that many recent proposals are unlikely to survive constitutional scrutiny under the Supreme Court’s current Second Amendment framework. One proposal would create a federally managed database of gun-violence-prevention research overseen by the CDC. Amanda expresses skepticism, arguing that such a database could selectively promote certain research while ignoring other studies. She references criminologist John Lott and claims that existing crime data have sometimes been revised in ways that affect public perception of trends. The hosts also discuss proposals involving mandatory mental-health evaluations for owners of certain semiautomatic rifles. Amanda criticizes the concept as both impractical and constitutionally questionable. She raises concerns about who would conduct the evaluations, who would pay for them, and how such requirements could be administered fairly. The conversation expands into broader concerns about privacy, social media monitoring, and government oversight of lawful gun owners. The final major topic focuses on suppressors and ongoing debates surrounding their regulation. Amanda references statements from lawmakers who characterize suppressors as tools primarily associated with criminal activity. The hosts reject that characterization, arguing that suppressors function more like hearing-protection devices that reduce noise rather than eliminate it. They emphasize that suppressors do not make firearms silent, comparing them to automobile mufflers that reduce but do not eliminate engine noise. Amanda views proposals such as suppressor buyback programs as examples of legislation driven more by misconceptions from popular culture than by practical realities. Throughout the episode, Amanda and Rob repeatedly return to themes of individual responsibility, skepticism toward government regulation, support for firearms education, and the defense of Second Amendment rights. The show combines reports from GunCon, commentary on current legal and political developments, criticism of gun-control proposals, and discussions of firearm culture, training, and community engagement.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41719360
info_outline
61426 hr2
06/15/2026
61426 hr2
In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell open the show with Amanda describing her experience at the A Girl & A Gun Drift Academy, a specialized training event designed to teach women not only firearms skills but also vehicle-based self-defense and emergency driving techniques. Amanda explains that participants learned how to draw and deploy a firearm from inside a vehicle, exit a vehicle safely while armed, protect passengers, and avoid accidentally pointing a firearm at others during stressful situations. The training included shooting into and out of vehicles, understanding how bullets behave when passing through windshields and doors, and practicing tactical vehicle exits. Amanda emphasizes that the training provided practical, hands-on lessons that are difficult to replicate through videos or classroom instruction alone. A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the driving component of the academy. Amanda describes exercises in which participants drove on a racetrack in close formation, practiced controlling vehicles on wet skid pads, and learned how to maintain control during slides and loss-of-traction situations. She notes that participants from northern states who had experience driving in snow generally adapted more quickly to the skid-control exercises. The academy also included lessons on vehicle ramming, defensive driving, and executive protection concepts, helping students understand how a vehicle can be used as a tool for escape and survival during dangerous situations. Amanda repeatedly characterizes the event as one of the most educational and memorable training experiences she has attended. After a commercial break featuring advertisements for firearms training organizations, safety programs, and educational resources, the hosts discuss GunCon Ohio, an event that combines aspects of a gun show, educational conference, and industry gathering. They explain that GunCon attracts firearm manufacturers, advocacy organizations, podcasters, trainers, and Second Amendment activists. Amanda notes that attendees can participate in panel discussions, meet industry figures, and interact with organizations such as the National Rifle Association, Gun Owners of America, and Second Amendment Foundation. The hosts encourage listeners to attend, emphasizing the opportunity to meet like-minded individuals and learn more about firearms, advocacy, and current issues affecting gun owners. The conversation then turns toward legal and political issues involving firearms. Amanda and Rob discuss ongoing challenges to firearm regulations around the country, including disputes involving the Department of Justice and state-level gun-control measures. They mention efforts by the Department of Justice to challenge restrictions in places such as the U.S. Virgin Islands and Minnesota, arguing that some state and local firearm regulations conflict with constitutional protections. The hosts describe these developments as evidence that federal officials are becoming more willing to challenge state-level restrictions than in previous years. The hosts also review several court cases involving the Second Amendment. One discussion centers on the Hawaii case known as Wolford, which concerns restrictions that effectively require permission before carrying firearms on private property. Amanda notes that recent rulings in New York and Maryland found similar restrictions unconstitutional, and that the Department of Justice has supported challengers seeking to overturn Hawaii’s law. The hosts express optimism that future court decisions may further expand protections for firearm owners and concealed carriers. Another legal topic involves a South Carolina self-defense case that reached the state Supreme Court. Amanda recounts the story of an 18-year-old store clerk who confronted a shoplifter. According to the discussion, the confrontation escalated from verbal warnings to the use of a taser, then a machete, and ultimately a firearm when the suspect continued advancing. The legal dispute centered on whether the clerk, the store owner, and the business itself could be held liable for the shooting. Amanda argues that the case demonstrates the importance of self-defense immunity laws and serves as an example of how individuals may be forced to escalate defensive measures when less-forceful options fail. The episode also includes broader discussions about politics and public policy. Amanda and Rob examine the effects of population distribution on elections and representation, arguing that large urban centers often dominate political decision-making while rural communities have less influence. They compare political trends in the United States to developments in Canada, where they believe firearm restrictions are gradually reducing participation in shooting sports. The hosts express concern that demographic and political changes could eventually lead to diminished firearm rights if gun owners fail to remain politically active and engaged. Later, the hosts discuss a congressional race in New York involving two Democratic candidates. Amanda argues that although one candidate presents herself as more supportive of the Second Amendment, both ultimately support measures such as assault-weapons bans, expanded background checks, and red-flag laws. The hosts contend that voters often receive only abbreviated campaign messages and may not fully understand candidates’ positions unless they research them more carefully. They use the race as an example of what they view as the importance of political literacy and informed voting. The final major topic focuses on civics education and public understanding of government. Amanda and Rob express concern that many Americans lack basic knowledge about how government functions, the roles of elected officials, and the constitutional system. They argue that schools devote less attention to civics than in previous generations and suggest that this contributes to confusion about public policy and constitutional rights. The hosts reflect on historical figures, the importance of reading history and foundational documents, and the need to educate future generations about government, citizenship, and the Constitution. They conclude that a stronger understanding of civics would help citizens make better-informed decisions and participate more effectively in public life. Overall, the episode combines practical self-defense training, firearms advocacy, legal developments, political analysis, and civic education. Amanda and Rob consistently emphasize preparation, personal responsibility, constitutional rights, and the importance of staying informed about legal and political issues that affect firearm ownership and individual freedoms.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41643940
info_outline
61426 hr1
06/15/2026
61426 hr1
In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss a wide range of topics centered on self-defense, firearms training, Second Amendment advocacy, and civic engagement. Amanda begins by sharing her experience attending the A Girl & A Gun Drift Academy, a three-day training event that combines firearms instruction with vehicle-based self-defense and emergency driving skills. She describes learning how to safely draw and use a firearm from inside a vehicle, exit a vehicle under stress, protect passengers, and even use a vehicle as a defensive tool. Participants practiced shooting through windshields and doors, escaping from overturned vehicles, controlling skids on wet surfaces, and maneuvering cars in close proximity to one another. Amanda emphasizes that the hands-on experience provided valuable lessons that cannot be fully learned through videos or classroom instruction. The conversation then shifts to upcoming firearms-related events, particularly GunCon Ohio, which Amanda describes as a blend of gun show, educational conference, and industry gathering. The hosts explain that the event will feature manufacturers, firearms organizations, podcasters, and panel discussions on Second Amendment issues. They note that organizations such as the NRA, Gun Owners of America, and the Second Amendment Foundation are expected to participate, and that Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy is scheduled to appear. Amanda encourages listeners to attend and engage with others who share an interest in firearms and constitutional rights. The hosts also discuss several current legal and political issues involving firearms. One topic involves ongoing Supreme Court discussions regarding firearm restrictions on marijuana users. Rob suggests that historical traditions and the Founding Fathers’ attitudes toward alcohol consumption may influence future court decisions. This leads into a broader conversation about how society often focuses on different health and safety concerns over time, from asbestos and lead paint to today's concerns about microplastics. The hosts use these examples to illustrate how public perceptions and regulatory priorities evolve from generation to generation. A major theme of the episode centers on public awareness of gun rights. Amanda recounts a dinner conversation with a highly intelligent friend who questioned why she dedicates so much time to Second Amendment advocacy, arguing that Americans already have access to firearms. Amanda explains that the exchange reminded her how many people are largely unaware of the political, legislative, and legal battles surrounding gun ownership. She observes that even educated individuals who closely follow current events may not fully understand the scope of ongoing efforts to restrict firearm ownership or the importance many gun owners place on protecting constitutional rights. The discussion expands to developments in Canada, where the hosts argue that firearm restrictions are gradually undermining competitive shooting sports. They describe concerns that younger participants may be unable to enter certain shooting disciplines due to restrictions on acquiring firearms, potentially causing those sports to disappear over time. Amanda and Rob compare these developments to political trends in the United States, arguing that large urban populations often dominate policy decisions while rural communities have less influence. This leads into a broader conversation about representation, elections, redistricting, and the long-term impact of demographic changes on firearm policy. Later in the program, the hosts discuss a New York congressional race in which two Democratic candidates express support for various gun-control measures. Amanda argues that although one candidate presents herself as more supportive of gun rights than the other, both ultimately favor significant firearm restrictions. The hosts contend that many voters only hear brief campaign messages and may not fully understand candidates’ positions without examining them in greater detail. The final portion of the episode focuses on civics education and political literacy. Amanda and Rob express concern that many Americans no longer understand the distinctions between state and federal government or the roles of elected officials at different levels. Amanda notes that she frequently encounters people who are unsure whether a particular issue should be addressed by state legislators, members of Congress, or federal agencies. The hosts also discuss declining attention spans, reduced reading habits, and the influence of smartphones on modern culture. Reflecting on the 1976 Bicentennial celebration, Amanda argues that Americans once received more exposure to history, civics, and patriotic education than they do today. She suggests that improving public understanding of constitutional principles, government structure, and American history would help citizens become more informed and engaged participants in the political process. Overall, the episode combines practical self-defense training experiences with discussions about firearms policy, constitutional rights, political awareness, and civic education. Amanda and Rob repeatedly emphasize the importance of preparation, personal responsibility, and staying informed about the legal and political issues that affect the Second Amendment and individual freedoms.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41643910
info_outline
6726 hr2
06/08/2026
6726 hr2
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio featured hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell, along with guest Charlie Cook of Riding Shotgun with Charlie, discussing a variety of Second Amendment issues, upcoming Supreme Court decisions, concealed carry rights, and grassroots advocacy efforts. The show blended legal analysis, personal experiences, and interviews with representatives from Women for Gun Rights, creating a wide-ranging discussion about the current state of gun rights activism in America. The opening segment focused heavily on several anticipated Supreme Court decisions expected before the end of the Court’s term. Amanda expressed excitement about the pending rulings, particularly those involving firearms rights. The hosts discussed the Wolford case, often referred to as the “vampire rule” case because it involves laws that effectively prohibit carrying firearms on private property unless owners explicitly invite gun owners to do so. Amanda explained that the case could have major implications for how states define “sensitive places” where firearms may be prohibited. The hosts argued that some states have expanded the definition of sensitive places so broadly that lawful concealed carry has become nearly impossible, and they hope the Court will establish a clearer, narrower standard. Another major topic involved the Supreme Court case concerning marijuana users and firearm ownership. The discussion centered on the inconsistency of federal law, which specifically prohibits firearm ownership by marijuana users while treating other legal and illegal substances differently. Amanda questioned why marijuana receives unique treatment on federal firearms forms and argued that the Court may be forced to address broader issues involving employment, driving regulations, workers’ compensation claims, and personal freedoms. Charlie shared a humorous story from his younger days when he innocently questioned a job interviewer about drug testing procedures and accidentally made himself look suspicious despite never having used drugs. The hosts agreed that any decision could have consequences far beyond firearms law and may require lawmakers to reconsider how impairment and substance use are measured and regulated. The conversation expanded into a broader discussion about individual liberty and personal responsibility. Charlie described his evolution from a traditional conservative perspective toward a more libertarian outlook, emphasizing that people should generally be free to make their own choices so long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. Amanda agreed, using the familiar analogy that one person’s rights end where another person’s rights begin. This led to a philosophical discussion about constitutional rights, self-defense, and accountability for one’s actions. Returning to the Wolford case, Amanda expressed particular interest because attorney Alan Beck, who is involved in the litigation, is someone she knows personally. She described him as a dedicated constitutional advocate and emphasized how significant the case could become for concealed carry permit holders nationwide. The hosts explained that several states have attempted to designate vast numbers of locations as sensitive places where firearms are prohibited, effectively undermining the practical exercise of carry rights recognized in recent Supreme Court decisions. They believe the Court’s ruling could help define constitutional limits on such restrictions. The discussion also touched on the reality of navigating complex carry laws. Charlie admitted that many gun owners face difficult decisions when entering locations with firearm restrictions, noting that ordinary people often encounter conflicting laws and regulations. Amanda emphasized that she has always tried to avoid becoming a legal test case, joking that she never wants a Supreme Court case named after her because that generally means someone’s rights were violated or a serious legal conflict occurred. The hosts reflected on how quickly ordinary citizens can become involved in landmark legal battles simply by exercising what they believe are their constitutional rights. Another significant topic involved the intersection of politics and firearms rights. Amanda noted that Supreme Court decisions unrelated to firearms can still affect the Second Amendment indirectly. She cited redistricting cases and election-related rulings as examples of decisions that may influence legislative control and ultimately determine the future of gun laws. The hosts discussed gerrymandering, congressional representation, and census-related debates, examining how political power and representation can affect firearm policy at both the state and federal levels. The second half of the program featured an interview recorded at the NRA Annual Meeting with representatives from Women for Gun Rights. Guests Tammy and Kate discussed the organization’s upcoming National Summit, which marks the group’s tenth anniversary. Historically, Women for Gun Rights focused on bringing state directors to Washington, D.C., for advocacy efforts, but this year the organization is opening participation to the public. The summit will include advocacy training, instruction on interacting with elected officials, a rally at the Capitol, and a celebratory gala. The guests explained that attendees will learn how legislation works, how to communicate effectively with lawmakers, and how ordinary citizens can become influential advocates for constitutional rights. Amanda reflected on her own experiences visiting Washington, D.C., describing the emotional impact of walking through historic government buildings and realizing that citizens have direct access to their representatives. The Women for Gun Rights representatives emphasized that advocacy becomes much less intimidating once people understand that elected officials are ordinary individuals who can be approached, questioned, and held accountable by their constituents. The interview also highlighted a significant organizational shift for Women for Gun Rights. Rather than simply encouraging supporters to follow their activities, the organization has created a formal membership structure with multiple participation levels. The new membership program is designed to increase engagement, strengthen financial support, and encourage members to become active participants in advocacy efforts rather than passive observers. The guests explained that the organization’s mission extends beyond firearms ownership to broader constitutional education, political engagement, and the development of women leaders within the Second Amendment movement. A substantial portion of the interview focused on the importance of women’s voices in firearms advocacy. The guests argued that women bring unique perspectives to policy discussions and noted that female-led advocacy organizations have historically been highly effective in influencing public opinion and legislation. They pointed out that women represent one of the fastest-growing demographics among firearm owners and consumers, making their involvement increasingly important within both the firearms industry and the political landscape. The guests also discussed the documentary project In Her Defense, an upcoming multi-part docuseries that tells the stories of women whose lives have been shaped by firearms ownership and self-defense issues. Some stories involve women who survived violent encounters because they had access to firearms, while others involve women who wished they had been armed when they faced danger. One guest shared her experience immigrating from Australia, where civilian firearm ownership is far more restricted, and described how living in the United States deepened her appreciation for individual liberty and personal responsibility. Another guest explained that she was once strongly anti-gun but changed her perspective after personal experiences and education exposed her to information that challenged her previous beliefs. The episode concluded with a discussion about outreach and coalition-building within the firearms community. The Women for Gun Rights representatives explained that they were spending time at the NRA convention networking with businesses, sponsors, and potential members. They stressed the importance of funding advocacy work and building partnerships that allow organizations to continue educating the public and defending constitutional rights. Amanda closed the segment by emphasizing that women are not merely participants in the firearms community but increasingly influential leaders, consumers, educators, and advocates whose voices are shaping the future of the Second Amendment movement. Overall, the episode combined legal analysis, constitutional discussion, personal storytelling, and advocacy-focused interviews. The central themes were the importance of upcoming Supreme Court decisions, the evolving legal landscape surrounding firearms rights, and the growing role of grassroots organizations—particularly women-led groups—in defending and promoting Second Amendment freedoms across the United States.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41579060
info_outline
6726 hr1
06/08/2026
6726 hr1
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio featured hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell, joined in-studio by Charlie Cook of Riding Shotgun with Charlie. The conversation began with reflections on a recent New England firearms advocacy conference organized by the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. The hosts praised the event for maintaining a strong regional focus on issues facing the New England states rather than allowing national figures to dominate the discussion. They emphasized how valuable it was for activists, advocates, and organizations from across the region to connect, compare strategies, and build relationships around shared legislative and cultural challenges. The discussion then shifted to innovative grassroots outreach efforts. Amanda highlighted an event hosted by the Connecticut Citizens Defense League where wild game harvested by local hunters was served to legislators and visitors at the state capitol. The hosts discussed how events like these help humanize gun owners and hunters, demonstrating the connection between firearms, conservation, food sourcing, and outdoor traditions. They suggested that displaying photos of the hunters and the firearms used to harvest the game could help further educate the public about responsible firearm ownership and hunting practices. From there, the conversation moved into hunting experiences and shooting skills. The hosts exchanged humorous stories about hunting, including discussions about bear hunting regulations and the challenges of bow hunting. Amanda described her own struggles with archery accuracy, joking that her arrows often landed nowhere near the intended target despite extensive practice. This led to a broader discussion about the realities of marksmanship, the importance of understanding one's equipment, and how different people develop shooting skills at different rates. One of the most entertaining segments involved Amanda recounting an old firearms training class where she repeatedly asked an instructor questions about body positioning and balance while shooting. Her repeated question—"Where do I put my butt?"—became an inside joke among the hosts and served as a launching point for a discussion about how shooting instruction has evolved over the decades. They compared older shooting stances and techniques with modern approaches, noting that many methods once considered standard have largely disappeared from contemporary firearms training. The hosts spent considerable time discussing point shooting versus sighted fire. They explored the value of becoming so familiar with a firearm that a shooter can instinctively align it with a target. Charlie shared his experiences transitioning from traditional iron sights to a pistol equipped with a red dot optic, describing the learning curve involved in trusting the optic rather than searching for the sights. The conversation emphasized the importance of repetition, practice, and developing natural firearm presentation skills regardless of the aiming system being used. Reloading ammunition became another major topic. Charlie discussed the economics of handloading and how the financial benefits depend heavily on the type of ammunition being produced and how much a shooter practices. Rob and Amanda noted that while reloading can save money over time, it often evolves into a hobby of its own. They also joked about the temptation to accumulate yet another specialized hobby within the shooting sports world. Competitive shooting and advanced firearms skills were recurring themes throughout the episode. The hosts discussed top-level competitors such as Jerry Miculek and Lena Miculek, marveling at their extraordinary speed, coordination, and technical proficiency. They described examples of Lena performing remarkable feats such as loading shotguns while moving, balancing on exercise balls, riding unicycles, and engaging targets with incredible precision. These stories led to a broader discussion about dedication, practice, and the enormous amount of work required to achieve elite-level performance. Amanda contrasted those accomplishments with her own admitted lack of balance and coordination. She humorously recounted her fear of heights, inability to skip, and discomfort on rooftops, all while expressing admiration for athletes and shooters who possess exceptional balance and body control. The hosts used these stories to emphasize that different people have different natural abilities, but dedication and training can still produce significant improvement. The conversation also explored the concept of natural shooters—people who seem to possess an innate ability to hit targets with little formal training. Rob recalled a foster brother who rarely shot but could consistently excel at shotgun sports whenever he picked up a firearm. The hosts reflected on how some individuals appear to have exceptional hand-eye coordination and target acquisition skills, while others must develop those abilities through practice and repetition. The final portion of the program focused on personal shooting journeys and family influences. Amanda shared stories about her grandfather, an accomplished trap shooter who competed extensively and introduced her to the sport at a young age. She recalled the physically demanding experience of shooting hundreds of trap targets as a child and the lessons her grandfather taught about lead, follow-through, and target tracking. Those experiences shaped her appreciation for shooting sports and influenced her later involvement in firearms education and advocacy. The hosts concluded by reflecting on how their respective paths into shooting evolved—from childhood plinking and hunting to firearms instruction, competition, collecting, and advocacy work. Throughout the discussion, they emphasized the value of continuous learning, mentorship, responsible firearm ownership, and the community connections that develop through participation in shooting sports and Second Amendment activities. The episode balanced serious discussions about training and advocacy with humor, personal stories, and an appreciation for the diverse ways people become involved in the firearms community.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41579025
info_outline
53126 hr2
06/01/2026
53126 hr2
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio focused on the hosts’ visit to the Springfield Armory Museum in Massachusetts following the New England Firearms Advocacy Conference. Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussed the historical significance of the former federal armories at Springfield and Harpers Ferry, including the development of military firearms and manufacturing techniques. A major topic was the Pedersen Device, an innovative World War I-era conversion system designed by John Pedersen that could transform a bolt-action rifle into a semi-automatic firearm firing a pistol-caliber cartridge. Although thousands were produced, the end of World War I led to the devices being withdrawn and destroyed, making surviving examples rare collector pieces. The conversation also explored competing firearm designs of the early 20th century, the development of the M1 Garand, and the evolution of the Thompson submachine gun. The hosts were particularly impressed by the museum’s manufacturing exhibits, which showcased the machinery and processes that revolutionized firearm production. They discussed interchangeable parts, rifling machines, stock-making equipment, and early industrial innovations such as the Blanchard stock-copying machine. Amanda reflected on how advances in manufacturing dramatically reduced production times and highlighted the ingenuity required to create mass-production systems using relatively primitive power sources such as water wheels and leather belts. The discussion also touched on the historic concentration of firearms manufacturers in western Massachusetts, including companies such as Savage Arms, O.F. Mossberg & Sons, and Iver Johnson. The second half of the program focused on current Second Amendment advocacy efforts. The hosts reviewed the recent New England Firearms Advocacy Conference, organized by Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and discussed cooperation among groups such as the Second Amendment Foundation, the National Rifle Association, and various state-level organizations. Amanda announced plans to interview Joe LaPorta about the NRA’s role in state-level legislative battles and its relationship with local advocacy groups. The hosts also examined several current legal and legislative issues. They discussed lawsuits challenging state restrictions on Glock pistols and so-called “Glock switch” regulations, arguing that courts continue to grapple with Second Amendment questions following the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision. They highlighted proposed federal legislation known as the Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act, which seeks to prevent veterans from losing firearm rights solely because they receive assistance managing finances or daily affairs. Amanda and Rob argued that many veterans have been unfairly affected by existing policies and expressed support for reforms that would require stronger due-process protections. The show concluded with a discussion of Oregon’s Initiative Petition 28, a proposed ballot measure framed around animal cruelty. The hosts argued that the proposal could have far-reaching consequences beyond animal welfare, potentially affecting hunting, fishing, ranching, pest control, and livestock breeding practices. They encouraged Oregon residents to carefully read the full text of the measure rather than relying solely on its title or promotional descriptions, emphasizing the importance of understanding the practical effects of ballot initiatives before voting. Throughout the episode, the hosts combined historical firearms discussion with contemporary debates over firearm rights, legislation, and public policy.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41491775
info_outline
53126 hr1
06/01/2026
53126 hr1
In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell broadcast from the New England Firearms Advocacy Conference in Chicopee, Massachusetts. The conference brought together Second Amendment advocates from across the New England states to discuss ongoing legal, legislative, and political battles affecting gun rights. Hosted by organizations such as the Second Amendment Foundation and the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, the event was modeled after the annual Gun Rights Policy Conference and provided opportunities for networking, sharing ideas, and learning from activists working in different states. Amanda and Rob discussed why advocacy groups often skew older, noting that younger people are frequently occupied with careers and family responsibilities before becoming involved in political activism. A major focus of the program was their visit to the Springfield Armory National Historic Site. The hosts explored the armory’s role in American history, from its founding in the late 18th century through its closure in 1968. They discussed how Springfield became a center of firearms manufacturing, the development of interchangeable parts and mass production techniques, and the evolution of military firearms produced there. Rob was particularly fascinated by the machinery, manufacturing methods, and the armory’s importance in advancing American industrial production. The discussion highlighted several unique museum exhibits, including a rifle reportedly struck by lightning during the Civil War, firearms personalized by soldiers, and displays showing the progression of military weapons over nearly two centuries. Amanda and Rob described demonstrations involving an 1861 Springfield musket, discussing the loading process, percussion caps, black powder cartridges, and the challenges soldiers faced using such weapons in combat. They also examined how captured foreign firearms and experimental designs became part of the armory’s historical collection. Much of the episode focused on the evolution of U.S. military rifles. Rob explained the development of firearms from the Springfield muskets through the M1 Garand, M14, M16, and M4. He described how changing battlefield requirements, advances in ammunition, and the need for lighter weapons influenced military decisions. The hosts discussed the transition from .30-06 ammunition in the M1 Garand to 7.62 NATO in the M14 and eventually to the lighter 5.56 NATO cartridge used in the M16 and M4 platforms. Rob also explained how factors such as recoil, ammunition weight, and controllability affected the military’s choices. The conversation expanded into military sidearms and historical handguns, including Lugers, Mausers, Colt revolvers, and the 1911 pistol. They discussed shoulder stocks for pistols, drum magazines, and how changing firearms laws affected ownership of certain combinations of firearms and accessories. Rob explained how military experience in conflicts such as the Philippine-American War influenced the U.S. Army’s return to larger-caliber handguns, eventually leading to adoption of the 1911 pistol chambered in .45 ACP. The hosts also explored firearm collecting and rarity. Rob described unusual and highly sought-after firearms, including early experimental military rifles and Singer-manufactured 1911 pistols from World War II. Because only a small number of Singer pistols were produced before the company was reassigned to manufacturing other wartime equipment, surviving examples have become some of the most valuable collector firearms in existence. Throughout the episode, Amanda and Rob blended firearms history, military technology, collecting, and advocacy, using their visit to Springfield as a way to connect modern Second Amendment activism with the historical development of American firearms manufacturing and military arms.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41491750
info_outline
52426 hr2
05/25/2026
52426 hr2
This segment of Eye on the Target Radio covered several major themes in the Second Amendment world, beginning with an interview featuring Holly Sullivan Scali, president of the Connecticut Citizens Defense League and board member of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Sullivan discussed the upcoming New England Firearms Advocacy Conference in Chicopee, describing it as the first major regional effort to unite Second Amendment organizations from across the six New England states. She explained that gun-rights groups often work independently despite facing similar legislative and legal battles, and that the conference is intended to build stronger communication and cooperation between organizations, attorneys, legislators, and activists throughout the region. The event would feature speakers including John Lott and Dick Heller, along with panel discussions involving lawmakers, attorneys, and state-level advocacy groups. Sullivan emphasized making activism more accessible by bringing conferences closer to local communities rather than requiring supporters to travel across the country for national events. The conversation also explored the realities of activism and online engagement in the firearms community. Amanda and Rob discussed internet trolling, hostile comment sections, and misinformation spread through social media and forums. Amanda shared examples of being mocked online and reflected on how both anti-gun activists and uncompromising gun-rights extremists often dominate online discussions, while more moderate or practical voices stay silent. The hosts stressed the dangers of bad advice circulating online, especially in areas like firearm reloading where misinformation could potentially cause injury or damage. They concluded that many reasonable gun owners avoid participating in online arguments altogether because of the toxic environment. The show then shifted into political discussion surrounding Brandon Herrera, widely known online as “The AK Guy.” The hosts discussed his congressional campaign in Texas and highlighted his fundraising success compared to his Democratic opponent. They talked about the growing influence of online content creators in politics and the importance of grassroots fundraising, noting how small donations from many supporters can significantly impact campaigns. The hosts also reflected on the changing popularity of AK-style rifles versus AR-style rifles, attributing some of the shift to rising ammunition costs and differences in accuracy and practicality. Later in the program, Amanda and Rob examined current Second Amendment litigation and activity at the Supreme Court of the United States. They discussed why the Court has not yet taken up major cases involving AR-15s or magazine-capacity bans, explaining that the Court hears only a limited number of cases each year across all legal subjects, not just gun rights. They reviewed the continuing influence of the landmark District of Columbia v. Heller and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen decisions, along with related cases concerning sensitive-place restrictions and marijuana users possessing firearms. The hosts also referenced commentary from Mark Smith of the Four Boxes Diner, who explained how courts are increasingly using historical dictionaries and original-language analysis to interpret constitutional meaning, not only in Second Amendment cases but in First Amendment disputes as well. Amanda and Rob concluded by noting how constitutional interpretation often depends heavily on understanding how words were used and understood at the time the Constitution and Bill of Rights were written.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41414590
info_outline
52426 hr1
05/25/2026
52426 hr1
In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussed a wide range of Second Amendment and firearms-related legal developments, focusing heavily on the impact of the Supreme Court’s New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen decision. They explained how the “history, text, and tradition” standard established in Bruen is reshaping firearms litigation nationwide, particularly challenges to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives regulations and the National Firearms Act. The hosts argued that many modern gun restrictions lack historical precedent and predicted continued legal challenges involving suppressors, machine guns, bump stocks, forced-reset triggers, and other regulated firearms accessories. They also discussed historical militia expectations from the 1700s and how those are now being revisited in modern constitutional arguments. The show also covered lawsuits involving firearm detection technology in schools. Amanda described the case surrounding Omni Alert after a shooting at Antioch High School, where the school’s AI gun-detection system allegedly failed to prevent an attack despite being marketed as a safety solution. The hosts debated whether schools and technology companies can be held liable when these systems fail. They connected that discussion to broader debates about school safety policies and responsibility, referencing previous incidents where administrators allegedly ignored warning signs before school shootings. Another major topic involved ongoing political and legal fights over firearms laws in states like Virginia and Florida. The hosts discussed new Virginia gun-control measures and the resulting lawsuits filed by groups including the National Rifle Association, Second Amendment Foundation, Gun Owners of America, and National Shooting Sports Foundation. They also highlighted actions by Florida’s pro-Second Amendment attorney general against a homeowners association that attempted to ban firearms in shared community spaces. Throughout the program, Amanda and Rob framed these cases as examples of expanding legal resistance to firearm restrictions across the country. The episode concluded with discussion of proposed federal legislation, including efforts by Lauren Boebert to remove remaining tax provisions tied to the National Firearms Act and a proposal from Jimmy Patronis to repeal the Hughes Amendment restrictions on newly manufactured machine guns. The hosts debated how these changes could affect collectors, firearms values, and future gun ownership rights. Alongside the political discussion, the show featured advertisements and promotional spots for firearms training organizations, gun safety programs, books, and shooting-related products.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41414565
info_outline
51726 hr2
05/18/2026
51726 hr2
In this segment of Eye on the Target Radio, host Amanda Suffecool interviews bestselling author Jack Carr at SHOT Show, discussing his background, writing process, and upcoming projects. Carr talks about returning to SHOT Show for the first time since 2020 and describes the event as a reunion filled with energy, creativity, and support from fans. Amanda shares how excited listeners were when they learned she would be interviewing him, with many sending questions and praising his books. Carr explains that he knew from the age of seven that he wanted to become a Navy SEAL. Growing up with a librarian mother, he developed a deep love for reading and storytelling. Influenced by thriller authors such as Tom Clancy, Nelson DeMille, and David Morrell, he unknowingly built a foundation in storytelling while also studying nonfiction books on terrorism, insurgencies, and military leadership. Carr explains that his combat experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan allow him to write fiction that feels emotionally authentic because the emotions and reactions in his stories are drawn from real-life experiences. Amanda describes reading Carr’s novel Cry Havoc as an intense and emotional experience, saying she frequently had to stop reading and walk around because of the suspense. Carr reveals that much of the novel was inspired by interviews with MACV-SOG veterans from the Vietnam War. He explains the extensive historical research required to accurately portray 1968-era weapons, gear, and mindsets without accidentally introducing modern perspectives or technology. To immerse himself in the era, he surrounded himself with authentic Vietnam-era equipment, including watches, knives, and firearms while writing. The discussion then shifts to Carr’s larger fictional universe and the multigenerational storylines woven throughout his books. Fans had asked whether he planned to continue exploring earlier generations of his characters, possibly even further back in history. Carr says he enjoys building family legacies into his stories, inspired in part by author Stephen Hunter and his Swagger series. While he does not currently plan to go as far back as ancient history, he hints that additional historical stories are possible. Carr also discusses his writing pace, explaining that he aims to publish at least one book per year and recently added nonfiction to his portfolio. He mentions his nonfiction work Targeted Beirut, focused on the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing, which earned recognition on the Marine Corps Commandant’s reading list. Amanda asks whether Carr’s publishers ever challenge the detailed firearm and tactical realism in his books. Carr says he has been fortunate to maintain complete creative control and that his editors and agent encourage him to continue emphasizing authenticity because readers deeply value accuracy, especially gun owners and military enthusiasts who immediately notice mistakes in other novels. Finally, Carr introduces his upcoming novel The Fourth Option, releasing in May. Unlike his previous books, this novel launches an entirely new series with new characters and a new universe. He describes it as a modern interpretation of the classic western-style “stranger comes to town” story inspired by the television series Have Gun – Will Travel. Carr explains that he begins every novel by outlining the ending and overall direction before allowing the story to evolve naturally as he writes. In this continuation of Eye on the Target Radio, host Amanda Suffecool continues her conversation with bestselling author Jack Carr before transitioning into an in-depth interview with firearms trainer and entrepreneur Kevin Dixie of “No Other Choice” firearms training. Carr discusses his creative process in greater detail, explaining that before committing to a book, he writes what amounts to a back-cover summary for himself. He then evaluates whether the idea is compelling enough to devote a year or more of his life to writing. If it passes that test, he develops an outline while always keeping the ending in mind. Carr says the villains are often the most interesting part of the process because each new book requires entirely new antagonists after the previous ones have been eliminated by protagonist James Reece. Amanda and Carr also discuss the importance of authenticity and reader engagement. Carr shares stories about secretly signing copies of his books in airport bookstores and posting clues for fans on social media. He says one of the most meaningful aspects of his career is hearing from readers who connect deeply with his work or rediscover reading because of his novels. Carr emphasizes that readers are trusting him with their limited time, which motivates him to approach every page with care and purpose. The conversation turns philosophical as Carr explains how fiction helps build empathy by allowing readers to experience the world through someone else’s perspective. He argues that reading books develops emotional understanding in ways social media cannot, especially among younger generations who are reading less frequently. Carr says he actively promotes reading in general, not just his own books, because of its lasting impact on critical thinking and empathy. Carr also previews upcoming projects, including his new novel The Fourth Option, releasing May 12, and the second season of The Terminal List television series starring Chris Pratt. He notes that audiobooks have become one of the fastest-growing parts of publishing, with narrator Ray Porter earning praise from fans for bringing the stories to life. The second half of the program shifts to an interview with Kevin Dixie, founder of No Other Choice firearms training. Dixie explains that the name “No Other Choice” reflects his philosophy that force should only be used as an absolute last resort. Drawing on experiences from both law enforcement and growing up in inner-city St. Louis during the crack epidemic era, he emphasizes that self-defense training should teach not only how to use force, but when to avoid it. His message centers on responsibility, restraint, and extending grace whenever possible. Dixie also shares his personal journey, including overcoming difficult circumstances and surviving suicide attempts as a teenager. He explains that the phrase “No Other Choice” became a broader life philosophy about perseverance, self-improvement, and refusing to become a victim of circumstance. Amanda praises his ability to blend professionalism, tactical skill, and personal authenticity in a way that makes him stand out within the firearms industry. The discussion expands into the importance of individuality and breaking stereotypes within gun culture. Dixie encourages people to be themselves rather than feeling pressured to fit a specific “tactical” image. Amanda notes that his polished appearance and approachable personality make him memorable in a crowded industry while still being backed by genuine expertise. The interview concludes with a detailed explanation of Dixie’s “Train and Learn” event, a three-day professional development conference for people involved in the firearms and freedom communities. The event combines business education, firearms training, networking, and personal development. Participants attend workshops on marketing, sponsorships, social media strategy, and business operations, then participate in live-fire training, medical classes, hand-to-hand defense, and even night vision experiences. Dixie explains that the event was created to help people in the industry build sustainable careers and meaningful relationships while improving their skills. Amanda strongly endorses the value of the networking opportunities and encourages listeners to attend, emphasizing that the connections formed there can become invaluable professional resources.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41330005
info_outline
51726 hr1
05/18/2026
51726 hr1
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio focused heavily on the excitement and innovation surrounding the SHOT Show in Las Vegas, where hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussed the evolution of the firearms industry, new products, and the changing culture within the Second Amendment community. They reflected on how SHOT Show has grown over the years, from a place where they knew very few people to an event where they now regularly reconnect with industry figures, media personalities, and firearm innovators. They highlighted the networking atmosphere, the constant buzz of activity, and the broad range of attendees involved in firearms rights, manufacturing, and training. The conversation explored how the firearms industry has changed over time, particularly with the growing inclusion of women and newcomers. Amanda noted that women were once largely ignored at trade shows but now play a much more significant role in both the consumer market and the industry itself. They also discussed how ammunition and firearm design continue to evolve, especially with trends toward subsonic calibers, short-barreled rifles, suppressors, and defensive shooting platforms. Amanda described her fascination with ballistic gel demonstrations, which visually show how different ammunition performs on impact, while Rob explained how modern bullet design is adapting to newer firearm platforms and shooting applications. A substantial part of the show centered on firearm ergonomics, optics, and defensive shooting philosophy. Amanda and Rob talked about various sight systems, red dots, and fast-acquisition defensive sights, emphasizing that under stress many people rely more on muscle memory than perfect sight alignment. Amanda admitted that while she enjoys firearms, highly technical discussions about ballistics and rifle engineering are not her strongest area, preferring instead to handle and test firearms directly before forming opinions. They also discussed trends in firearm popularity, noting how the 9mm cartridge has become dominant in the self-defense market, surpassing older revolver calibers such as .38 Special. The hosts gave listeners a behind-the-scenes look at SHOT Show itself, describing the enormous convention layout spanning multiple expo centers connected by walkways over city streets. They explained how “Radio Row” operates as a hub for firearms media outlets and content creators, with numerous radio programs, podcasts, and video teams conducting live interviews throughout the event. Amanda highlighted the energy and chaos of broadcasting live from the show floor, where constant background noise and crowds make production both exciting and challenging. Later in the episode, Amanda and Rob interviewed Chris from Detroit Gun Works, discussing the company’s history and manufacturing philosophy. Chris explained that the company began as a producer of affordable, reliable AR-platform rifles aimed at working-class shooters. Over time, especially during the COVID-era firearms surge, the company shifted focus toward engineering improvements, in-house manufacturing, and precision machining. Detroit Gun Works now emphasizes billet-machined components, Midwest sourcing, suppressors, bolt-action rifles, and custom AR platforms tailored for law enforcement and civilian shooters alike. Chris also discussed current market trends, particularly the growing popularity of suppressors and short-barreled rifles following changes to federal tax stamp rules. The interview covered the company’s new compact bolt-action “Mini” rifle platform designed for precision shooting and hunting applications. Amanda and Rob praised the company’s support for law enforcement and first responders while also joking about firearm collecting habits, gun purchases, and the challenge of hiding new firearms purchases from spouses. Throughout the broadcast, the hosts repeatedly emphasized firearms safety, constitutional rights, responsible ownership, and training. Numerous sponsor segments promoted gun safety education, women’s firearms training, self-defense instruction, shooting accessories, and Second Amendment advocacy organizations. The overall tone of the episode combined industry commentary, humor, technical discussion, and enthusiasm for the firearms community gathered at SHOT Show.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41329975
info_outline
51026 hr2
05/11/2026
51026 hr2
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio featured two very different but compelling conversations. The first half focused on the NRA Whittington Center and its role as one of the premier shooting and outdoor recreation facilities in the country. Host Amanda Suffecool interviewed Nate Brown about his journey from Wyoming and the oil and gas industry into nonprofit conservation work and eventually into the NRA. Brown explained that his passion for preserving Second Amendment freedoms and America’s outdoor heritage led him into fundraising and nonprofit work before relocating to New Mexico to work at the Whittington Center. Brown described the immense scale of the Whittington Center, which spans roughly 33,000 acres, with only a small portion developed into shooting ranges and facilities. The center includes pistol bays, silhouette ranges, law enforcement training areas, long-range shooting facilities, cabins, camping areas, and extensive wilderness. He emphasized that the property blends shooting sports with wildlife conservation, noting the abundance of mule deer, bears, mountain lions, and other wildlife that coexist around the ranges. Amanda discussed her own experiences attending the Women’s Wilderness Escape at the center and highlighted how overwhelming—but exciting—the facility can feel for first-time visitors. The conversation also focused heavily on accessibility and encouraging newcomers. Brown explained that visitors can attend structured classes and events or simply purchase a day pass or annual membership to use the ranges independently. He acknowledged that the size of the facility can be intimidating and encouraged new visitors to stop at the visitor center, ask questions, and request tours or guidance. The discussion covered lodging options ranging from cabins to dispersed camping and emphasized the center’s desire to become more user-friendly through improved online booking and visitor resources. Throughout the segment, both hosts stressed the importance of introducing more people to shooting sports and responsible firearms culture in a welcoming environment. The second half of the program shifted to an interview with author Liz Lazarus, discussing her upcoming thriller novel Dawn Before Darkness. Lazarus explained that the novel combines elements of stalking, guardianship abuse, and psychological suspense. Inspired partly by real stories from women who experienced stalking and by her own difficult legal battle involving guardianship of her mother, Lazarus crafted a story that blends entertainment with cautionary legal and personal safety lessons. Lazarus described how she interviewed numerous women about their stalking experiences and incorporated those accounts into the novel’s antagonist. She also detailed her own experience fighting through probate and guardianship court after family disputes over her mother’s care led to a third-party guardian being appointed. The discussion explored how vulnerable families can become when legal paperwork, wills, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives are not properly prepared or accessible. Amanda shared a personal story about the importance of having medical power-of-attorney documents readily available during emergencies, reinforcing one of the book’s central messages about preparedness. The interview also explored Lazarus’s writing process and publishing journey. She discussed her earlier novels, including Free of Malice, which was inspired by her own experience surviving an attack in college. Lazarus explained the distinctions between suspense novels, thrillers, and psychological thrillers, noting that her books often blend all three genres while incorporating themes of firearms safety, self-protection, and legal realities. She spoke about the challenges of researching difficult topics, including interviewing people about stalking and even researching what it feels like to be shot in order to realistically portray scenes in the book. Toward the end of the segment, Lazarus described the realities of modern publishing, explaining that writing the book itself is often easier than marketing it. She talked about working with public relations teams, using social media influencers, attending conferences, and building connections with readers to gain visibility in a crowded publishing world. The hosts closed by encouraging listeners to preorder Dawn Before Darkness and explore Lazarus’s earlier standalone novels.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41245740
info_outline
51026 hr1
05/11/2026
51026 hr1
In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussed a wide range of Second Amendment issues, focusing heavily on recent developments involving the ATF, federal firearms regulations, and ongoing constitutional battles over gun rights. Broadcasting from different parts of the country, the hosts opened with commentary about the appointment of a new permanent ATF director and what that could mean for gun owners. Rob joked about the ATF director acting like a “scapegoat,” while Amanda explored the broader role of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and how firearms issues often feel especially targeted compared to alcohol or tobacco regulation. The conversation shifted into the history of gun control in America, beginning with the National Firearms Act of 1934 and subsequent federal regulations. Rob and Amanda argued that many gun restrictions historically emerged in response to gang violence and sensationalized media coverage, but over time expanded to affect ordinary gun owners. They reflected on decades of activism by organizations like the NRA, noting that many gun owners remember legislative losses more than victories or successful efforts to “hold the line” against additional restrictions. A major portion of the discussion centered on recent legal developments involving the Supreme Court and the impact of the 2022 Bruen decision, which established the “history, text, and tradition” standard for evaluating gun laws. Amanda praised Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon for aggressively supporting Second Amendment cases and highlighted comments by Supreme Court justices suggesting that AR-15-style rifles are likely protected because they are in “common use.” The hosts discussed how even dissenting opinions from liberal justices, including Elena Kagan, acknowledged that AR-15s are commonly owned, which they believe weakens arguments for bans on such firearms. The show also focused heavily on Colorado’s restrictions on standard-capacity magazines. Amanda described attending a large women’s shooting conference in Colorado where participants had to carefully check state laws and in some cases purchase lower-capacity magazines to remain compliant. She applauded the Justice Department’s lawsuit challenging Colorado’s magazine ban, arguing that the state criminalized magazines commonly sold with popular firearms. Rob expanded the discussion into the broader issue of the “patchwork quilt” of state gun laws that complicates interstate travel for gun owners, especially those flying through restrictive states like New York. The hosts also criticized newer proposals in states like New York and California that target BB guns, toy gun markings, and youth firearm-related activities. They argued these efforts are part of a broader cultural strategy to discourage younger generations from becoming interested in shooting sports, hunting, or firearms ownership. Later in the episode, Rob reviewed several proposed ATF rule changes being considered under the new leadership. One major topic involved the Supreme Court’s Cargill decision regarding bump stocks. The hosts discussed how the federal government had previously ordered owners and manufacturers to destroy or surrender bump stocks after classifying them as machine guns. They questioned whether the government should compensate manufacturers and gun owners for confiscated property and speculated about possible future lawsuits seeking damages. The conversation then turned to National Firearms Act regulations. Rob explained that proposed changes may simplify interstate travel with NFA-regulated items such as suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and machine guns by removing the requirement to obtain prior ATF permission for temporary travel across state lines. Another proposal would allow married couples to jointly register NFA items without requiring a trust, potentially simplifying inheritance and possession issues after the death of one spouse. Amanda and Rob also examined proposed changes to ATF paperwork and recordkeeping requirements. They discussed updates to the Form 4473 background check process, including the possibility of expanded electronic filing systems for firearm dealers. While acknowledging that digital records could improve efficiency, both expressed concern that centralized electronic systems might eventually enable illegal firearm registries. They also described the complicated and inconsistent ways gun dealers currently maintain paper records, making firearm tracing difficult and labor-intensive. Throughout the broadcast, the hosts repeatedly emphasized concerns about government overreach, inconsistent state laws, and the long-term cultural fight surrounding firearm ownership and Second Amendment rights. Interspersed throughout the program were advertisements and public service announcements promoting firearm safety, training organizations, gun-related products, educational groups, and responsible gun ownership initiatives.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41245720
info_outline
50326 hr2
05/04/2026
50326 hr2
In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, the hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell broadcast from the NRA Annual Meetings & Exhibits and focus on both internal changes within the National Rifle Association and the broader culture surrounding it. A major portion of the discussion centers on Ron Andring, a retired member who launched the Facebook group “Members Take Back Our NRA.” After reviewing court records tied to the NRA’s legal troubles in New York, Andring became frustrated with what he saw as long-standing mismanagement and lack of accountability. His page grew quickly into a hub where members could openly share concerns, exchange information, and organize around reform efforts. The hosts and Andring argue that this kind of grassroots communication has helped energize members, influence board elections, and contribute to a wave of resignations among long-time leadership figures, signaling a shift away from what they describe as an entrenched “old guard.” The conversation also highlights how the organization is attempting to rebuild. Following the resignation of former CEO Wayne LaPierre and findings from legal proceedings, the NRA has introduced more oversight measures, including compliance roles and stronger audit practices. The hosts describe recent member meetings as unusually transparent, with leadership inviting direct questions and feedback—something they say had not happened in decades. While acknowledging past misconduct, they emphasize that many members still see the NRA as essential and are focused on reform rather than abandonment. There is also discussion about structural challenges, such as the difficulty of attracting younger board members due to the unpaid, time-intensive nature of the role, which tends to favor retirees or those with flexible finances. The second half of the episode shifts to the convention floor itself, where the hosts explore collector exhibits that showcase firearms history. They interview collectors from the Ruger Collectors Association who created an elaborate display featuring early Sturm, Ruger & Co. firearms and catalogs from 1949 to 1963. The exhibit includes dozens of rare pieces, from well-worn “working guns” to extremely scarce prototypes that never entered full production. A particularly interesting topic is the concept of “bucket of parts” guns—firearms assembled from leftover components during manufacturing transitions—which are often overlooked by casual owners but prized by knowledgeable collectors. These pieces highlight how manufacturing practices and historical quirks can create unexpected rarity and value. Beyond the firearms themselves, the segment explores the craftsmanship and effort required to build such displays. The collectors describe the process as a partnership—one focusing on acquiring historically significant items, the other on designing and constructing a visually compelling exhibit that can safely showcase them in a temporary convention space. The hosts emphasize that these displays are often one-time opportunities; many collections are shown once and then never publicly assembled again. The discussion also touches on early company history, including co-founder Alexander Sturm, whose artistic background and financial backing helped launch Ruger but is less widely recognized than his partner. Overall, the episode blends two themes: institutional reform and historical appreciation. On one hand, it presents a picture of an organization undergoing internal change driven by member activism and increased transparency. On the other, it highlights the deep enthusiasm within the firearms community for preserving history, craftsmanship, and unique artifacts. Together, these threads paint a broader picture of a community that is both looking inward to fix its institutions and outward to celebrate its heritage.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41140355
info_outline
50326 hr1
05/04/2026
50326 hr1
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio is broadcast from the NRA convention floor, capturing the energy and activity of the event. The hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss the Gun Collectors Committee, explaining how collector groups display rare and historical firearms and memorabilia, and how judges evaluate exhibits for awards. Highlights include unique collector pieces like antique Colt firearms, historically preserved items, and a D-Day paratrooper display, emphasizing both the guns and their historical context. The show also features interviews and discussions on broader Second Amendment topics. A criminal defense attorney from Attorneys on Retainer explains the importance of immediate legal support after self-defense incidents and stresses that people should avoid speaking to police without counsel, as statements can harm their case. Another major segment focuses on Walk the Talk America, an organization working to bridge the gap between the firearms community and mental health professionals. The discussion highlights efforts to reduce stigma, promote mental health resources for gun owners, and encourage proactive solutions to prevent tragedies, while maintaining support for Second Amendment rights. Throughout the episode, recurring themes include responsible gun ownership, education, safety, legal awareness, and the importance of open dialogue—both within the firearms community and with those who hold different perspectives.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41140325
info_outline
42626 hr2
04/27/2026
42626 hr2
The hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss several recent gun policy developments across the United States, focusing on states and jurisdictions they view as increasingly restrictive. They begin with New York’s proposed Senate Bill 9215, which would classify BB guns and air rifles as “imitation weapons,” raise the legal age to 18, and require bright coloring and barrel plugs—rules that critics argue would make such devices unusable and blur distinctions between low-powered BB guns and high-powered air rifles. They frame this as part of a broader trend of tightening regulations and limiting access. The conversation then shifts to Washington, D.C., and the case Benson v. United States, which challenges magazine capacity limits and firearm licensing requirements. A lower court panel initially ruled parts of D.C.’s law unconstitutional, but the case is now being reheard by the full appellate court. The hosts explain that conflicting rulings between courts are often necessary to get a case in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, so a loss at this stage could actually increase the chances of a final nationwide ruling. They also highlight a split between federal circuits on whether machine guns are protected under the Second Amendment, noting that differing rulings (such as one from the Eighth Circuit versus a Kansas case) could also push the issue toward Supreme Court review. In Virginia, they describe ongoing legislative battles over proposed restrictions on semi-automatic firearms and magazine capacities, suggesting political maneuvering is delaying final decisions and limiting the ability of advocacy groups to challenge the laws in court before they take effect. At the federal level, the hosts discuss efforts by members of Congress to influence the selection of an Attorney General who would roll back Biden-era gun regulations, including rules on pistol braces, “ghost guns,” and what qualifies as being “engaged in the business” of selling firearms. They explain that the ambiguity around private gun sales creates legal uncertainty for individuals. Another major topic is marijuana policy. With cannabis being reclassified from a Schedule I to Schedule III drug, the hosts note potential implications for firearm ownership rules—specifically the federal background check form (ATF Form 4473), which currently bars users of illegal drugs from purchasing firearms. They connect this to a pending Supreme Court case (U.S. v. Rahimi/Hemani as referenced in the show), suggesting the Court may revisit how drug use affects Second Amendment rights. Finally, they touch on economic impacts within the firearms industry, particularly a labor strike at the Lake City Army Ammunition Plant. Because it produces a large share of .223/5.56 ammunition, the hosts warn that supply disruptions could drive prices higher in the near future. Overall, the segment combines legal updates, political developments, and industry news, emphasizing how court decisions, legislation, and federal policy changes could shape gun rights and access going forward.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41028450
info_outline
42626 hr1
04/27/2026
42626 hr1
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio features hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell recapping their recent trip to the NRA Annual Meeting in Houston and discussing current developments in the firearms world. They begin by sharing highlights from the event. Rob was particularly interested in a new, more affordable reproduction of the classic Luger pistol, which could make historically significant firearms accessible to everyday shooters. Amanda’s standout moment was receiving the NRA’s Sybil Ludington Award, recognizing her contributions to Second Amendment advocacy. They also discuss the growth of the “Voices of the Second Amendment” media row, which brought together dozens of content creators and significantly expanded outreach, with millions of combined followers. The conversation then shifts to broader industry and political topics. They note increasing collaboration among major Second Amendment organizations like the NRA, Gun Owners of America, and the Firearms Policy Coalition, especially in legal efforts following recent Supreme Court decisions. The hosts emphasize that while these groups have long been active, they are now doing a better job of communicating their work. A large portion of the discussion focuses on state-level legislation. Vermont is criticized for attempting to expand gun restrictions, including controversial measures that could penalize individuals for seeking mental health support and impose liability on gun dealers. In contrast, Indiana is praised for passing laws that protect gun businesses and shooting ranges from restrictive zoning and regulatory burdens. They also cover ongoing legal and political battles over firearms, including efforts in states like Maryland and Connecticut to target Glock handguns due to illegal modifications that can convert them to fully automatic. The hosts argue that such bans are ineffective since criminals can modify firearms regardless, and they stress that enforcement of existing laws is more important than adding new ones. Overall, the episode blends event recap, industry insights, and political commentary, with a focus on Second Amendment advocacy, legal developments, and the challenges facing gun owners and businesses.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/41028435
info_outline
41926 hr2
04/20/2026
41926 hr2
The episode focused heavily on current Second Amendment legal battles, including the case involving Susanna Kipke and another case involving Tyler Izagirre. The hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell explained how these cases are slowly moving through the courts and how legal standing can disappear over time as laws change or plaintiffs move away. Tyler Izagirre remains the last active plaintiff in a case challenging District of Columbia restrictions on magazines over 10 rounds after being denied the ability to register a Sig Sauer P365 with a 12-round magazine. The discussion then shifted to new interpretations from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives regarding unfinished frames, kits, and so-called “ghost guns.” The hosts explained that regulators are attempting to distinguish between unfinished firearm parts and kits that include instructions or templates. They argued that these rules have harmed businesses such as Polymer80 and raised broader concerns about government agencies changing regulations after businesses have already invested in products and manufacturing. The hosts also discussed leadership changes at the United States Department of Justice and speculated about possible future leaders, including Ken Paxton and Lee Zeldin. They debated whether temporary or acting officials have enough authority to make meaningful changes and stressed the importance of leaders having strong principles and being willing to face criticism. Another major topic was firearms policies on military bases. The hosts talked about reports that Pete Hegseth supports allowing service members to carry personal firearms on military bases if approved by commanders. They argued that trained military personnel should be able to defend themselves and their families both on and off base, comparing the issue to broader concealed carry debates. Toward the end of the program, the conversation broadened into manufacturing, environmental regulations, and tariffs. The hosts argued that many industries, including firearms-related manufacturing, have been pushed overseas because of environmental rules and labor costs. They discussed how products such as ammunition components, leather, machine tools, and gunpowder are increasingly made outside the United States, which they believe weakens national security and domestic industry. They also discussed proposed legislation in Colorado that could restrict 3D-printed firearms and noted that some lawmakers appear willing to wait for future elections before trying to pass more aggressive gun control measures. Overall, the show combined legal analysis, political speculation, and discussion about manufacturing and national policy, all tied back to the hosts’ belief that Second Amendment rights, self-defense, and American industrial independence are closely connected.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/40933750
info_outline
41926 hr1
04/20/2026
41926 hr1
The radio segment focused heavily on recent legal and political developments surrounding gun rights. Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussed a proposed change by the United States Postal Service that could allow private individuals to mail handguns for the first time since 1927. They argued that current restrictions force gun owners to use more expensive private carriers like UPS and FedEx, increasing costs for consumers and gun shops. They also noted that the Department of Justice has reportedly signaled that the longstanding postal restrictions may be unconstitutional under the framework established by the Bruen decision. The hosts also spent time discussing the National Firearms Act and lawsuits challenging continued registration requirements for suppressors and other NFA-regulated items after certain tax provisions were removed. They argued that if the NFA tax has been eliminated, the registration system should also disappear. They highlighted a lawsuit involving the Second Amendment Foundation, the NRA, the American Suppressor Association, and others challenging the continued registry requirements. Another major topic was the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which protects firearm manufacturers from lawsuits when criminals misuse guns. Amanda and Rob compared lawsuits against gun companies to suing car manufacturers when someone uses a car in a crime. They discussed ongoing legal fights over attempts by states like New York to work around those protections through “public nuisance” laws and noted that several pro-gun organizations and states are supporting challenges to those efforts. The show also covered Amanda’s successful election to the NRA Board of Directors for a three-year term. She described the stress of waiting for the election results and thanked supporters for helping her place near the top of the field. The hosts encouraged listeners to attend the NRA Annual Meeting in Houston, arguing that people who are skeptical of the NRA should see firsthand what the organization does. Amanda and Rob argued that recent Supreme Court decisions such as Heller, McDonald, and Bruen have gradually expanded Second Amendment protections. They suggested that more gun-rights victories may come in the future, including potential national concealed carry reciprocity and further restrictions on state and local gun control laws. The discussion later shifted to Ohio, where the hosts criticized efforts by cities like Columbus, Cleveland, and Cincinnati to enact local gun regulations despite state preemption laws that prohibit cities from passing rules stricter than state law. They argued that these cities repeatedly waste taxpayer money by pursuing lawsuits they are unlikely to win. Finally, the segment turned to California. Amanda criticized California’s gun laws and argued that lawmakers use “spot bills” to hide controversial gun control measures until late in the legislative process. The hosts also discussed a college student who wrote about why women may need access to firearms for self-defense, arguing that physical differences between men and women can make firearms an important equalizer in dangerous situations. They concluded by saying that political change depends on more people becoming engaged, running for office, and participating in local government.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/40933725
info_outline
41226 hr2
04/13/2026
41226 hr2
In this hour of Eye on the Target Radio, the hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss several major Second Amendment-related issues, starting with criticism of the ATF’s rulemaking process. They argue that public input is often ignored and focus on the 2022 rule redefining “frames and receivers,” which expanded regulation to unfinished or partially completed firearm components. The hosts question the logic behind the rule, particularly how “ghost gun” statistics increased largely due to changes in definitions rather than actual crime trends. They also suggest that criminals are more likely to obtain stolen firearms than build them from kits. The conversation then shifts to upcoming Supreme Court cases, including challenges involving concealed carry restrictions, “sensitive places,” and firearm possession related to marijuana use. They express anticipation for decisions expected later in the year, especially regarding how far states can go in restricting carry rights. A real-world self-defense case is discussed next, where a man shot a woman who jumped in front of his truck and pointed a gun at him. Despite clear circumstances, it took four months for authorities to rule the shooting justified, which the hosts criticize as excessive and harmful to the defender. They also examine ongoing legal and political battles at the state level. In Virginia, potential firearm bans could trigger federal lawsuits, while in Kentucky, the governor vetoed bills expanding concealed carry rights for 18–20-year-olds and limiting liability for gun manufacturers. The hosts highlight tensions between legislatures and governors and question inconsistent political positions. The discussion broadens to include international and cultural perspectives, such as Canadian Inuit communities pushing back against firearm restrictions affecting their hunting rifles. Domestically, they critique urban policies in places like New York and Boston, where social workers are increasingly being sent to handle potentially dangerous situations instead of police, arguing this may put those workers at risk. Finally, the hosts address broader societal issues like mental health, crime, and gang violence. They argue that some policies focus too heavily on “gun violence” rather than underlying causes such as criminal activity or social breakdown. The segment concludes with concern over public safety trends and skepticism about current policy approaches.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/40824375
info_outline
41226 hr1
04/13/2026
41226 hr1
The episode of Eye on the Target Radio opens with hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussing their upcoming trip to the NRA Annual Meeting in Houston. They describe the event as a massive gathering featuring firearms, gear, training sessions, collectors’ exhibits, and industry personalities, noting its size, rotating locations, and importance within the Second Amendment community. They also highlight their involvement in the “Voices of the Second Amendment” media row, where numerous content creators will interview guests and produce live content. The conversation shifts to legal and political developments surrounding gun rights. A major topic is the Department of Justice considering restoring firearm rights to nonviolent felons, provided they demonstrate rehabilitation and pose no public safety risk. The hosts frame this as a return to a pre-1990s process that had been defunded, while also discussing how marijuana-related convictions and upcoming court decisions could impact firearm eligibility. They emphasize internal changes within the DOJ, suggesting a divide between long-standing officials and newer leadership that may be more supportive of Second Amendment rights. They also discuss ongoing court cases and legal battles, including challenges to machine gun regulations and conversion devices, highlighting the complexity and uncertainty in current firearm laws. Another key case involves Washington, D.C.’s ban on magazines over 10 rounds, where prosecutors declined to defend the law, potentially weakening its future and affecting whether the issue reaches the Supreme Court. Throughout the episode, the hosts mix legal analysis with commentary on political shifts, Supreme Court influence, and federal agency leadership changes. They conclude by noting how evolving court decisions, legislation, and enforcement priorities could significantly reshape gun laws in the near future, while maintaining a conversational and often humorous tone.
/episode/index/show/eottr/id/40824355