Mindframe(s)

Each week Dave and Michael talk about film and where it fits in the larger social story.

Episode 100: The Roses 08/26/2025

Episode 99 - Weapons 08/17/2025

Episode 99 - Weapons 🎧 Episode 99: Weapons – Horror, Mystery, and Institutions in Crisis In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave welcome special guest Tim Peebles—theologian, pastor, martial artist, and long-time film aficionado—for a deep dive into Zach Cregger’s new film Weapons. Cregger, known for Barbarian (2022), returns with a multi-layered, genre-bending thriller where a small town unravels after its children mysteriously disappear into the night. With a Rashomon-style narrative, striking cinematography from Larkin Seiple (Everything Everywhere All at Once), and a cast led by Josh Brolin, Julia Garner, and Benedict Wong, Weapons pushes the boundaries of modern horror. 🔑 Topics We Discuss The intense bidding war for the film—why even Jordan Peele wanted it How the script stayed almost entirely intact from page to screen A Rashomon-inspired structure and its effect on pacing and suspense Cinematic homages: from Magnolia to The Shining to Italian giallo classics Performances: Brolin’s rugged father figure, Garner’s demanding lead role, and Wong’s unexpected turn as a school principal Themes of institutional failure (schools, police, community) and whether the film offers political commentary The balance of horror, comedy, and surreal mystery that keeps audiences hooked 🎬 Why It Matters Weapons is more than just another horror release—it’s a cultural reflection on distrust of institutions, layered with dread, dark humor, and unforgettable imagery. Our conversation unpacks how Cregger masterfully controls tone, from the eerie to the playful, while still delivering an unnerving ride. ⭐ Ratings Dave: 4–4.5 stars – “A thrill ride you’ll want to rewatch.” Michael: 3.5–4 stars – “Ambitious, mixed-genre storytelling with a few tonal bumps.” Tim: Highly recommends – “Dreadful and beautiful, horrifying and humorous—Cregger’s step up from Barbarian.” /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/37849465

Episode 98: Eddington 07/24/2025

Episode 98: Eddington Film Overview Title: Eddington (2025) by Ari Aster Setting: Small-town New Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic Premise: Tension and division between a local sheriff (Joaquin Phoenix) and the town's mayor (Pedro Pascal), reflecting broader cultural and social fractures in America. Themes: Polarization, the influence of social media, performative activism, the corporatization of crisis, and the psychological weight of 2020. Cast & Performances Joaquin Phoenix (Sheriff Joe Cross): Widely praised for his layered, committed performance. Considered perfect for the role. Pedro Pascal (Mayor Ted Garcia): Serves as a foil to Phoenix’s sheriff. Also well-cast, though not a co-lead. Emma Stone: Mixed feelings about her casting due to age and tone. Some discussion of alternative casting. Austin Butler: Divisive but ultimately defended. His character is seen as representative of evangelical or conspiracy-driven youth. A recurring homeless man character is discussed as a possible metaphor for society’s ignored truths or the prophetic outsider. Cinematography & Technical Merits Director of Photography: Darius Khondji (corrected after initially being misattributed to Bruno Delbonnel) Visuals praised as among the best of the year—shot in New Mexico using real locations, lighting used to evoke horror pacing and psychological tension. Stylistic comparisons to Hereditary and Seven. Return of Ari Aster's visual motifs: isolation, daylight-to-night transitions, and symbolic elevation (e.g., houses on hills). Genre & Stylistic Notes Described as: “Not quite a horror film, but horror-influenced” A blend of satire, tragedy, psychological thriller, dark comedy, and drama Compared to: No Country for Old Men (tone and landscape) Robert Altman’s Nashville (ensemble structure and social chaos) King of Comedy and Taxi Driver (Scorsese comparisons in the spoiler section) Rejection of Coen Brothers comparisons as too simplistic Thematic Analysis (Spoiler Section) Fragmentation of Reality: The main theme is how social media algorithms and performative digital culture drive people apart. Bothsides-ism: The film avoids heroes or villains; it's more about the system manipulating everyone. Performative Activism: Especially embodied in the youth protest scenes—young people react to national injustices despite their local irrelevance. Corporate Exploitation: A data center being built in the town is the real power move while townsfolk are distracted by culture wars. The Sheriff as a Symbol: Joe Cross embodies both traditional authority and the poisoned populism of social media-age politics. Final Acts of Violence: Symbolize collapse under social pressure and loss of moral compass. ⭐️ Ratings Michael: 4 out of 5 stars – “Bold, sharp, close to perfect…” Dave: 4 out of 5 stars – “Difficult but essential viewing… very funny, deeply human…” 🗣️ Start of Reviews ⏱️ Timestamp: 40:50 Michael opens the review section, defending the film’s boldness, satire, and visual style. Emphasizes how the film captures the chaos and performative energy of 2020. Strong praise for the thematic relevance and technical execution. Final rating: 4 out of 5 stars ⏱️ 46:31 – Dave’s Review Compares the emotional weight of Eddington to films like Civil War and No Country for Old Men. Praises the film for humanizing characters and confronting social disintegration. Final rating: 4 out of 5 stars Ends with a call for the film to be recognized as one of the most thought-provoking of the year. 🧠 Start of Thematic Discussion ⏱️ Timestamp: 50:34 “Let’s talk about the cacophony that is this film in our spoiler section…” 00:20 – Explores how Eddington portrays social media as a force of division, aligning with Ari Aster’s Wired interview. 01:11 – Aster’s quote about telling a coherent story from an incoherent miasma is discussed and praised. 02:15 – Dave references a protest scene and critiques performative activism in a majority-white town. 04:46 – Joe Cross as a stand-in for embodied social media, broadcasting manipulation via megaphone. 06:08 – Dave compares the film to Scorsese’s King of Comedy and Taxi Driver, especially in how antagonists are aggrandized. 07:26 – Michael analyzes characters like Sarah, pointing out value systems shaped entirely by online culture. 08:13 – Cross and the protesters mirror each other’s rhetoric but cannot communicate—highlighting echo chambers. 08:46–12:12 – The unhoused character is explored as a possible prophetic figure. The town ignores real suffering in favor of symbolic outrage. 12:25–14:11 – The sheriff’s arc from performative compassion to violence is unpacked. His choices reflect moral confusion and performative politics. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/37530090

Episode 97 - 28 Years Later 07/07/2025

Episode 96: The Phoenician Scheme 06/20/2025

Episode 95 - The Life of Chuck 06/14/2025

Episode 94: Friendship 05/31/2025

Episode 93: Mission Impossible: Final Reckoning 05/25/2025

Episode 93: Mission Impossible: Final Reckoning 🎙️ Mindframe(s) Podcast – Episode 93 Mission: Impossible: Final Reckoning (and Franchise Retrospective) 🎬 Film Details Title: Mission: Impossible – Final Reckoning Director: Christopher McQuarrie Writers: Christopher McQuarrie, Erik Jendresen Main Cast: Tom Cruise – Ethan Hunt Hayley Atwell – Grace Esai Morales – Gabriel Ving Rhames – Luther Stickell Simon Pegg – Benji Dunn Rebecca Ferguson – Ilsa Faust Pom Klementieff – Paris ⏱️ Timestamps & Highlights 00:15 – Intro Michael and Dave kick off with their usual charm, setting the tone for a franchise deep dive. 01:00 – Plot Recap Ethan Hunt faces off against “The Entity,” a rogue AI threatening global stability. 02:45 – McQuarrie & Cruise: The Power Duo Exploring their partnership from Rogue Nation to Final Reckoning. 04:00 – The Franchise Evolves Reflections on how the series matured post-MI:2, with J.J. Abrams, Brad Bird, and McQuarrie each leaving a mark. 06:30 – Cast Talk Revisiting the ensemble—Benji, Grace, Luther, Gabriel—and a few names we all struggle to remember. 08:00 – Film Reviews Michael: Solid entry but overdramatic. Dave: Incredible stunts, a bit scattered narratively. 13:10 – MI’s Long Legacy From its TV origins to blockbuster dominance—what keeps MI relevant? 17:00 – MI vs. Bond An argument for Hunt as the more ethical spy archetype. 23:00 – The Power of Practical Stunts Cruise’s death-defying feats as franchise identity. 26:00 – John Wick Comparison Fun detour comparing franchises—emotional vs. spectacle-driven action. 29:00 – Celebrating Cruise Behind-the-scenes appreciation for Tom Cruise’s intensity and kindness. 32:30 – Marketing the Stunt How each film builds its campaign around a singular Cruise stunt. 36:00 – Consistency Pays Off Why MI might be the most consistent franchise outside the superhero realm. 42:00 – What’s Next? Sneak peek at Friendship and Thunderbolts in upcoming episodes. 📬 Contact Us Now Playing Network: Got feedback or just want to geek out about movies with us? Reach out—we’d love to hear from you! /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/36705145

Episode 92: Sinners 05/02/2025

Episode 92: Sinners Absolutely! Here’s the same set of show notes with chapter timestamps added to guide listeners through the episode: 🎙️ Mindframes – Episode 92 “Sinners (2025): Vampires, Blues, and the Power of Community” In this episode, Michael and Dave dive deep into Sinners, the bold, original horror-drama from director Ryan Coogler. Featuring Michael B. Jordan in a dual role and a breakout performance by Miles Katon, Sinners blends genre thrills with potent social commentary, historical resonance, and musical mysticism. 🧛‍♂️ Topics We Cover: 00:00 – Intro & Background Welcome and overview of Sinners Ryan Coogler’s directorial track record The film’s box office buzz and unique 25-year rights deal 07:00 – Coogler’s Style and Themes Socially conscious storytelling across Coogler’s films How Sinners fits in with Creed and Black Panther 09:00 – Cinematography & IMAX Impact Shot in 65mm IMAX—what it adds to the experience Natural light, cloudy skies, and thematic lighting shifts The power of visual framing and mise-en-scène 20:00 – Editing & Dual Performance Magic How the film nails having Michael B. Jordan play twins Why the editing feels seamless and emotionally grounded 24:00 – Music, Blues, and the Soundtrack The blues as culture, history, and emotional truth How the score becomes a character in the film A musical that isn’t a musical—but could be 26:30 – Cast Performances Michael B. Jordan’s award-worthy dual role Miles Katon’s emotional breakout Hailee Steinfeld, Delroy Lindo, and standout supporting cast A Chicago-based cameo worth cheering for 34:00 – Spoiler-Free Final Thoughts Emotional resonance and thematic impact Horror, humor, heart, and history Why it’s one of 2025’s most complete films 44:00 – Spoiler Section Begins Vampires as a metaphor for cultural appropriation The meaning of “Pick Poor Robin Clean” The juke joint as sanctuary and symbol The unforgettable ancestral musical scene Thematic reflections on sin, soul, and survival 🎬 Film on IMDb: 🎧 Mindframes /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/36405575

Episode 89: Mickey 17 04/24/2025

Episode 89: Mickey 17 🎙️ Mindframes Episode 89: Mickey 17 "Clone Wars, Class Wars, and Saucy Politics in Space" In this episode, Dave Canfield and Michael Cockerill dive into Mickey 17, Bong Joon-ho’s long-anticipated follow-up to Parasite. Set on a frozen alien planet, this satirical sci-fi tale stars Robert Pattinson as Mickey Barnes, a worker cloned repeatedly for hazardous missions — until one version survives and meets his successor. 🎬 What We Cover: The Bong Joon-ho Cinematic Universe From Snowpiercer to Parasite to Barking Dogs Never Bite, how Bong’s signature blend of class critique, dark comedy, and genre-bending plays out in Mickey 17. Cinematography with Darius Khondji A breakdown of the film’s visual tone, comparisons to Snowpiercer, High Life, and why the images may not quite match Bong's past visual highs. Robert Pattinson's Multiverse of Performances Dave and Mike celebrate Pattinson’s career choices — from The Lighthouse to The Batman — and how he brings depth and humor to not one but two Mickeys. Satire, Teeth, and Mark Ruffalo as a Space Trump A closer look at the film’s political commentary, from Ruffalo’s MAGA-esque cult leader to Toni Collette’s obsession with sauces and the absurdity of elite culture. The Cloning Conundrum & Worker Exploitation Is Mickey 17 an empathy machine? The hosts explore themes of expendability, labor value, and late-stage capitalism through the lens of sci-fi cloning. Comparisons & Influences The episode draws parallels to Moon, Us, High Life, The Empire Strikes Back, and even American Psycho — all filtered through Bong’s singular vision. 🔥 Quick Takes: “Bong Joon-ho makes movies about people trapped in systems that don’t value them.” “Toni Collette’s sauce obsession might be the most disturbing metaphor in the film.” “It’s like High Life with a hint of hope.” 🧠 Bottom Line: This might not hit the same heights as Parasite or Snowpiercer, but it’s still sharp, visually compelling, and deeply Bong. The Mindframes hosts both rate it 4 out of 5 Mickeys — and recommend seeing it on the biggest screen you can. 💌 Join the conversation: Visit Or hit us up on 🎧 Part of the Now Playing Network /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/36228400

Episode 91 - Warfare 04/19/2025

Episode 91 - Warfare 🎙️ Mindframes Podcast – Episode 91: Warfare 🎧 Hosts: Michael Cockerill & Dave Canfield 🎬 Film: Warfare (2025), dir. Alex Garland & Ray Mendoza 📍 Location: Music Box Theatre, Chicago ⏱️ Timestamps & Segment Summaries: [00:00–01:30] — Intro & Film Overview Michael introduces the film Warfare, co-directed by Alex Garland (Ex Machina, Civil War) and Ray Mendoza, a real-life Navy SEAL. Set during the Iraq War in 2006, the film follows a SEAL team as a surveillance mission devolves into a real-time battle for survival. [01:30–03:30] — Garland + Mendoza Collaboration The hosts highlight Garland’s visual language from Civil War and Mendoza’s military experience. Mendoza previously worked as a military advisor and makes his co-directorial debut, grounding the action in authenticity. [03:30–05:30] — A New Kind of War Film Dave and Michael compare Warfare to cinema verité. It strips away backstory, plot arcs, and even music, placing viewers in the immediacy of war. The film’s realism makes it emotionally immersive rather than glorifying. [05:30–10:00] — Comparing Garland’s Themes The hosts reflect on Garland’s previous works (Annihilation, Men, Ex Machina) and how Warfare departs from his usual metaphysical themes. While earlier films centered on confronting unknowns, Warfare is grounded and experiential. [10:00–16:00] — Tone, Politics & Empathy Dave emphasizes Warfare’s non-political stance — it doesn't "pick sides" but immerses viewers in the soldiers’ experience. The film resists traditional “hoorah” war tropes, favoring a depiction of camaraderie, trauma, and ambiguity. [16:00–22:00] — Acting & Realism Will Poulter is praised for his understated and believable performance. The cast’s lack of exposition or melodrama enhances the film’s immersive feel. The SEALs aren’t framed as superheroes — they’re human, fallible, and professional under extreme duress. [22:00–30:00] — Real-Time Pacing & Directorial Choices The podcast explores how real-time pacing increases tension. There’s no music, no time skips, no omniscient viewpoint — just boots-on-the-ground survival. The set was a reconstructed Iraqi neighborhood, shot with handheld cameras and long takes to increase claustrophobia. [30:00–40:00] — Cinematography as Philosophy The camera mimics a fellow soldier, crouching behind walls and moving with the characters. Michael and Dave liken this to the immersive style of 1917, though even more stripped down. Observational themes emerge as the camera shifts from viewer to viewed. [40:00–47:00] — Production Design & Immersive Worldbuilding Details like era-appropriate gear, drone tech, and consistent physical space reinforce realism. Everything down to military language is authentic, thanks to Mendoza. This reinforces the film’s goal: not storytelling, but situational transference. [47:00–56:00] — Why It’s Anti-War Without Saying So Michael and Dave argue that the film's realism is its anti-war statement. There's no need for speeches or political commentary — the relentless brutality and human cost speak volumes. Dave compares this to 1960s anti-war films like The War Game and Overlord. [56:00–01:01:00] — Final Thoughts & Timelessness The film ends with ambiguity — no grand victory, just survival and confusion. Michael praises the restraint: “They leave. That’s the ending.” Dave notes how demythologizing war through realism creates a deeper, more honest emotional impact. 💬 Highlight Quotes: “It’s not about choosing sides. You just happen to be with the Americans.” – Dave “The movie doesn’t tell you what war is. It makes you feel what it’s like.” – Michael “Once you strip away the mythology, all that’s left is shellshock and dust.” – Dave 🎖️ Ratings: Dave: ★★★★☆ — “One of the best anti-war films since the ‘70s.” Michael: ★★★★☆ — “Raw, claustrophobic, and unforgettable.” 📽️ Films Referenced: Civil War Annihilation Ex Machina Men 1917 Black Hawk Down Dunkirk Apocalypse Now The War Game Overlord 🧛 Next Episode Tease: 🎬 Sinners — Michael B. Jordan’s vampire-demon hybrid film might be next on the docket. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/36228425

Episode 90 - Death of a Unicorn 03/28/2025

Episode 90 - Death of a Unicorn Sure! Based on the transcript from Mindframes Episode 90 – "Death of a Unicorn", here are listener-friendly notes: Episode 90: Death of a Unicorn A Mindframes Film Conversation Guests: 🎙️ (Chicago film critic) 🎬 Basic Info Film: Death of a Unicorn Director: Alex Scharfman (Directorial debut) Genre: Black comedy with horror elements Cast Highlights: Paul Rudd as Elliot Jenna Ortega as Ridley Richard E. Grant as Odell Will Poulter as Shepard Téa Leoni as Odell's wife Anthony Carrigan as Griff Jessica Hynes as Shaw Premiere: South by Southwest (SXSW) Wide Release: This weekend (as of episode release) 🎭 Key Themes Satire of the ultra-wealthy Performative altruism Corporate greed (nods to pharma industry) Unicorns as metaphors — not for children! Mashup of genre: horror + black comedy Comparisons to Companion, Triangle of Sadness, and Black Sheep ⏱️ Timestamps & Highlights Timestamp Topic 00:00 Episode intro + guest Tarek Fayoumi joins 00:50 Overview of Death of a Unicorn & director Alex Scharfman 02:50 Early reactions and quirky tone of the film 05:30 Non-spoiler plot summary – unicorns, gore, and satire 06:57 Expanded plot: Paul Rudd’s character hits a unicorn en route to a CEO’s wilderness estate 08:00 Gore, vengeance, and absurdist turns 09:00 Neil deGrasse Tyson jokes and tonal weirdness 09:20 Cast discussion begins – Paul Rudd staying in his comedic “box” 11:00 Jenna Ortega’s horror film streak & flexibility as an actress 13:00 Will Poulter as a “punchable privileged” character with great comic timing 19:00 Téa Leoni praised for subtlety and satire – comparisons to Toni Collette 21:00 Recognition of supporting cast: Anthony Carrigan, Jessica Hynes, and Katherine Erbe 26:00 Commentary on satire and class critique 27:00 Cinematography discussion – possible nature doc inspiration 28:30 Importance of unicorn visuals – practical + CGI blend 32:00 Film was shot in Slovenia, animation outsourced – budget-conscious production 36:00 Cost-saving decisions and strategic casting choices 38:00 Discussion on shifting movie release windows and streaming vs theatrical landscape 39:30 Joke about popcorn buckets and box office trends 42:00 Reviews begin – Mike praises the genre blend and Will Poulter's performance 43:30 Dave praises the gore, creature effects, and genre fusion 46:00 Final verdict: 3 out of 4 unicorn horns from both hosts 47:00 Not for kids – don’t let the unicorns fool you! 48:00 Movie lacks a love story – passes a rare “MacDell test” Let me know if you’d like this formatted for a website or podcast show notes page — I can do that too! /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/35818250

Episode 88 - The Monkey 03/12/2025

Episode 88 - The Monkey Mindframes – Episode 88: The Monkey (2025) 🎙️ A sometimes half-assed but always wholehearted film conversation. 🔹 Hosts: Michael Cockerill & Dave Canfield 🔹 Episode Runtime: Approx. 56 minutes 🔹 Film Discussed: The Monkey (2025) 🔹 Directed by: Osgood Perkins 🔹 Based on: The Monkey (1980), a short story by Stephen King (Skeleton Crew) 🎬 General Information – The Monkey (2025) 🔻 Director: Osgood "Oz" Perkins (The Blackcoat’s Daughter, Longlegs, Gretel & Hansel) 🔻 Screenplay: Osgood Perkins 🔻 Based on: The Monkey by Stephen King 🔻 Cinematography: Nico Aguilar (Longlegs) 🔻 Special Effects Coordinator: Greg Pine (Final Destination-style death scenes!) ⭐ Cast Highlights Theo James (Divergent) – Hal & Bill (Twin Brothers, Dual Role) Christian Convery (Sweet Tooth) – Young Hal & Bill Elijah Wood (The Lord of the Rings) – Hammerman, a self-help parenting guru Tatiana Maslany (Orphan Black, She-Hulk) – Aunt Lois Adam Scott (Severance, Parks & Rec) – Cameo as the Monkey’s former owner Colin O’Brien (Wonka) – Petey Rowan Campbell (The Hardy Boys) – Ricky 🛠️ Special Trivia The toy monkey plays a drum, not cymbals, due to a legal conflict with Disney (Toy Story 3 featured a cymbal-playing monkey). Limited edition popcorn bucket featuring the monkey was a sought-after collectible. You can buy an official Monkey figurine for $125 at Neon’s store. 📌 Episode Breakdown & Timestamps [00:00] – Introduction Michael and Dave introduce the episode and film under discussion. [00:35] – What is The Monkey? Background on the film’s origin from Stephen King’s short story. Overview of Osgood Perkins’ horror film career. [01:39] – Osgood Perkins as a Director Dave shares his past interview with Perkins and how his films explore grief & trauma. Perkins' stylistic shift from atmospheric horror to dark comedy. [02:52] – How Different is This from Stephen King's Story? King’s original story = pure dread. This adaptation = comedic, absurd, yet still horror-infused. [04:10] – Trivia: Why Doesn’t the Monkey Have Cymbals? The monkey was originally designed with cymbals. Disney’s legal team intervened (due to a character in Toy Story 3). A drum was used instead—and now it's iconic. [05:58] – Cast & Performances Breakdown of the cast’s performances. Theo James’ dual role as Hal & Bill—a highlight of the film. Elijah Wood's role as a self-help guru satirizing modern parenting culture. Tatiana Maslany’s role & why she stands out. [09:47] – The Monkey's Death Scenes & Cinematography The over-the-top death scenes add to the Final Destination-style fun. Cinematography by Nico Aguilar (Longlegs) helps create aesthetic horror-comedy. [15:48] – Special Effects & The Role of Blood Mix of practical effects and CGI. Hosts critique CGI blood overuse but praise the practical effects. [18:46] – What is The Monkey Really About? The film explores generational trauma. Horror trend: Fathers passing down hidden burdens (Hereditary, The Wolfman). The monkey symbolizes trauma that can’t be ignored. [20:28] – How the Movie Handles Generational Trauma Hal tries to escape it—but the monkey keeps coming back. Final message: You can’t erase trauma, only learn to live with it. [27:31] – The Film’s Ending (Spoilers) The monkey is not destroyed—Hal and Petey drive away with it. The Horseman of Death cameo—what does it mean? School bus cheerleader decapitation scene: Meta-commentary on horror audiences? [39:55] – The Mystery of Ricky (Fan Theory) Could Ricky be Bill’s secret son? Shared trauma & absentee fathers play a major role. Closet uniform mystery—not everything adds up. [42:44] – Final Thoughts & Reviews Michael: Fun film, but not scary. Dave: Perkins proves his range beyond horror. Both agree: Worth watching, especially for horror-comedy fans. [48:08] – What Would You Do If You Had The Monkey? The monkey does NOT take requests—it kills on its own terms. [55:01] – Closing & Next Episode Next episode: Bong Joon-ho’s Mickey 17 starring Robert Pattinson. Listener engagement: Is The Monkey horror or comedy? What do you think of its take on generational trauma? Could there be a Monkey 2? 📲 Join the discussion: 💬 Email Michael & Dave: /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/35663480

Episode 87: Companion 02/19/2025

Episode 87: Companion Episode Summary In this episode, Dave and Michael discuss Companion, the directorial debut from Drew Hancock. A mix of science fiction, dark comedy, and thriller, Companion follows Iris, a robot companion, as she navigates power dynamics and hidden agendas during a weekend getaway at a remote lakeside estate. The film explores themes of toxic relationships, control, and AI consciousness, all while delivering sharp humor and unexpected twists. Director: Drew Hancock Genre: Sci-Fi, Dark Comedy, Thriller Produced by: Barbarian creative team (Zach Cregger, Roy Lee, J.D. Lipschitz, Raphael Margolis) Cast: Sophie Thatcher (Yellowjackets, Heretic) as Iris Jack Quaid (The Boys) as Josh Lucas Gage (Euphoria, The White Lotus) as Patrick Megan Suri (It Lives Inside, Never Have I Ever) as Kat Harvey Guillén (What We Do in the Shadows) as Eli Rupert Friend (The Death of Stalin, Homeland) as Sergei Timestamps & Discussion Highlights 00:00:15 - Introduction Dave welcomes listeners to Mindframes and introduces the show’s format. Michael reveals the movie they’re discussing: Companion (2024). 00:00:35 - Movie Overview Companion is the directorial debut of Drew Hancock. A science fiction, dark comedy, and thriller with "stabby stab" moments but not a full horror film. The plot follows Iris, a robot companion, as she joins her human partner, Josh, for a weekend getaway that quickly turns into chaos. 00:02:06 - The Barbarian Connection Produced by Zach Cregger (Barbarian), along with Roy Lee, J.D. Lipschitz, and Raphael Margolis. Cregger was originally set to direct but handed the project to Hancock. Shares some tonal shifts and unexpected turns similar to Barbarian. 00:03:59 - A Surprisingly Funny Movie Marketed as horror, but the film has strong comedic elements. Michael stopped watching the trailer halfway because it reveals too much. Despite its darker themes, the humor is well-placed and helps with pacing. 00:04:26 - The Cast & Performances Sophie Thatcher (Yellowjackets, Heretic) as Iris – A standout performance. Jack Quaid (The Boys) as Josh – A departure from his usual roles, making him unrecognizable compared to his character Huey in The Boys. Lucas Gage (Euphoria, The White Lotus) as Patrick – Cast as the “pretty guy.” Megan Suri (It Lives Inside, Never Have I Ever) as Kat – A complex role. Harvey Guillén (What We Do in the Shadows) as Eli – Comedic powerhouse, but hard not to see him as Guillermo. Rupert Friend (The Death of Stalin, Homeland) as Sergei – A mix of comedic and sinister. 00:12:51 - Cinematography, Editing & Directing Eli Bourne handles cinematography, giving the film an intimate, isolated feel. Michael praises the film’s pacing and editing, crediting Josh Ether for helping keep the story sharp. The location scouting is excellent, contributing to the film’s eerie atmosphere. 00:13:15 - The “Eat the Rich” Subgenre Comparison Companion shares *similarities with films like The Menu and Triangle of Sadness. Though not a direct critique of wealth, the film hints at class and power dynamics. 00:14:00 - January as a “Dumping Ground” for Movies Companion was released in early 2024, a time studios often use to release movies they’re unsure how to market. Despite this, the film is better than most January releases and deserves more recognition. Themes & Analysis 00:28:05 - Toxic Relationships & Power Imbalances Core theme: How control, manipulation, and exploitation manifest in relationships—both human and AI. Companion raises questions about agency and autonomy, especially in imbalanced relationships. 00:29:25 - Gender & Objectification Iris represents the struggles of real-world women who fight for autonomy in male-dominated spaces. Historically, women were seen as property—a dynamic mirrored in Iris’s role as a “companion.” 00:30:51 - The Film’s Unique Take on AI Representation Unlike many AI films that focus on “Pinocchio syndrome” (wanting to be real), Companion focuses on how people treat objects that can think and feel. Dave argues that the film doesn’t necessarily “humanize” Iris, but Michael strongly disagrees, saying she’s treated as an individual from the start. 00:37:12 - The Relationship Between Josh & Iris A perfect example of a toxic relationship. Josh gaslights and controls Iris, using his “love” as a justification for ownership. Parallels to real-life relationships where one partner holds all the power. 00:39:38 - Eli & Patrick: Love or Control? Eli & Patrick’s relationship is framed as genuine, but Eli literally has a kill switch for Patrick. Raises the question: Can there ever be real love when there’s an extreme power imbalance? 00:45:12 - Kat: A Different Kind of User Kat manipulates Sergei for money, just as Josh uses Iris for companionship. Unlike Josh, Kat is honest about her self-serving nature—making her an interesting contrast. Her conversation with Iris about feeling “disposable” adds emotional depth to her character. 00:48:43 - Josh’s Downfall & The Role of Technology Josh’s death by an automatic corkscrew is a symbol of his reliance on technology and the loss of control he thought he had. Technology and control are central themes—whether AI, smart devices, or old-school CD players. Verdict & Ratings 01:14:40 - Final Thoughts & Scores Dave: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) - “One of the best AI movies in recent years.” Michael: ⭐⭐⭐½ - ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (3.5 - 4/5) - “Great performances, strong pacing, and an excellent directorial debut.” 01:20:00 - Why You Should See Companion Companion is in limited theatrical release, so see it before it’s gone! Despite marketing challenges, it’s one of the best films of early 2024. Closing Notes & Where to Watch Companion is currently in wide release but may leave theaters soon. Mindframes encourages listeners to share their thoughts via email. 📢 What did you think of Companion? Let us know! 📧 Email us with your thoughts! /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/35343335

Episode 86: Presence 02/04/2025

Episode 86: Presence Mindframes: The Presence – A Steven Soderbergh Experiment Episode Summary: In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave are joined by special guest Tarek Fayoumi (MoviesWithTarek.com, Chicago Indie Critics) to dissect Steven Soderbergh's new film, The Presence. They explore its unique point-of-view cinematography, thematic connections to isolation in modern horror, and its place within Soderbergh's diverse filmography. The trio also debates the film’s strengths, weaknesses, and whether it truly earns its ghost story label. 🔖 Topics & Timestamps: ⏳ 00:00:14 – Welcome & Introductions Michael & Dave introduce the show and their guest, Tarek Fayoumi. Tarek shares insights from his work as a film critic. ⏳ 00:01:57 – Overview of The Presence Introduction to The Presence, a ghost story with a unique POV perspective. Soderbergh's cinematography choices and how they affect immersion. ⏳ 00:03:06 – Tarek’s Experience with Soderbergh How Soderbergh creates realism in his films. Discussion of his past work, including Contagion and the Ocean’s films. ⏳ 00:04:51 – What Makes The Presence Unique? The film’s VR-like cinematography and immersive ghostly POV. How the film builds tension without traditional horror tropes. ⏳ 00:05:22 – Ghost Story Influences Comparing The Presence to films like The Others, The Sixth Sense, and The Haunting. How it differs from found footage and traditional ghost stories. ⏳ 00:08:00 – David Koepp’s Writing & The Ending Debate Discussion of screenwriter David Koepp’s contributions (Jurassic Park, Stir of Echoes). Does the film’s ending work? Michael & Dave share mixed feelings. ⏳ 00:15:28 – Soderbergh’s Diverse Career: Any Common Threads? Oceans 11, Erin Brockovich, Solaris, and Sex, Lies, and Videotape – what connects them? Soderbergh’s recurring themes of surveillance, observation, and isolation. ⏳ 00:22:54 – Official Synopsis & Final Thoughts A family moves into a suburban home and suspects they are not alone… The Presence as an atmospheric rather than traditional horror. ⏳ 00:24:43 – Reviews & Star Ratings Dave: Compelling but imperfect; worth rewatching. Michael: A solid 3/5 stars – eerie but flawed. Tarek: 3/4 stars – an experimental approach that mostly works. ⏳ 00:30:23 – Spoiler Discussion: What is The Presence Really About? The film’s twist ending and character revelations. Comparing the film’s isolation themes to The Babadook, Hereditary, and Smile. ⏳ 00:41:50 – Isolation in Horror Films (Post-2010) The rise of horror exploring loneliness, grief, and societal detachment. Films like Midsommar, Talk to Me, Alone With You, and I Saw the TV Glow. ⏳ 00:52:04 – Final Thoughts on the Family Dynamics Lucy Liu as the mom – how does she fit into this role? The dad as a "perfect but helpless" figure. 🔗 Follow Us: 🌐 🌐 🎥 Guest: Tarek Fayoumi – /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/35107310

Episode 85: The Best of 2024 01/28/2025

Episode 85: The Best of 2024 In this episode of MindFrames, Dave and Michael break down the best films of 2024. With themes ranging from authoritarianism and resilience to identity and connection, the hosts discuss how these movies reflect and challenge the cultural zeitgeist. They also dive into the year’s standout horror films and share their thoughts on the Oscars' major contenders. Timestamps and Topics [00:00:16] Welcome and Introduction Dave and Michael set the tone for the episode, outlining their approach to discussing the best films of 2024. [00:01:18] Reflecting on the Year in Film The hosts share general thoughts on 2024 in cinema—was it a year of classics or just solid hits? [00:02:09] Horror Highlights of 2024 Dave and Michael praise the exceptional year for horror, with standout titles like The Substance, Nosferatu, and Cuckoo. [00:03:22] Oscar Campaigns and Predictions A lively discussion about the politics of Oscar campaigns, including surprises, snubs, and predictions. [00:04:49] Themes of 2024 in Film Michael discusses the criteria that shaped his top 10 list, emphasizing themes like despair, resilience, and power dynamics. [00:06:44] Top 10 Films: Starting with Nickel Boys Michael explains why Nickel Boys made his list, focusing on its themes and performances, while Dave critiques its filmmaking style. [00:09:16] Dave’s Horror List and Honorable Mentions Dave shares his top horror films of 2024, including Alien: Romulus and Handling the Undead. [00:15:11] A Complete Unknown: A Deep Dive Michael highlights Timothy Chalamet’s performance as Bob Dylan in this period drama, reflecting on its relevance to today. [00:28:09] Thematic Standouts: The Substance vs. Nosferatu A comparison of two horror standouts, with Michael favoring The Substance for its timely relevance and Dave praising Nosferatu’s timelessness. [00:50:20] International Gems: The Seed of the Sacred Fig Michael explores the Iranian allegory for authoritarianism and resilience, reflecting on its layered storytelling. [01:00:06] Animated Masterpiece: Flow Dave describes this visually stunning Latvian animated film, tying it to themes of community, refugees, and environmental decline. [01:03:28] Sean Baker’s Anora: A Human Story The hosts celebrate Anora as a funny, heartfelt, and raw depiction of resilience and humanity, with standout performances and themes. [01:08:07] Closing Thoughts and Listener Recommendations Dave and Michael reflect on how the year’s films resonate with ongoing cultural conversations and share what’s next for MindFrames. Dave's non-ordered list(s) A Different Man Seed of the Sacred Fig All We Imagine As Light Civil War Red Rooms The Substance Wicked Flow A Real Pain Sing Sing HONORABLE MENTIONS The Girl with the Needle The Room Next Door Anora Conclave September 5 Hard Truths Michael's list Sing Sing Conclave Anora The Seed of the Sacred Fig The Brutalist The Substance Nosferatu A Real Pain Wicked A Complete Unknown Nickel Boys Mentioned Films Where to Find Us www.mindframesfilm.com /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/35042145

Episode 84: Nosferatu 01/14/2025

Episode 84: Nosferatu Mindframes Episode: Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu Summary: In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave explore Robert Eggers' reimagining of the classic silent film Nosferatu. They discuss Eggers’ meticulous approach to filmmaking, the legacy of Nosferatu, and the cultural evolution of vampires in cinema. The conversation touches on German Expressionist cinematography, standout performances, and the thematic depth of the film. They also reflect on how vampires mirror societal fears across decades, from early depictions of monstrous villains to modern sympathetic portrayals. Timestamps: 00:00 – Introduction Overview of the podcast and today’s topic: Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu. Michael and Dave reflect on their history with Eggers’ films. 05:30 – The Legacy of Nosferatu A look back at the 1922 silent film and its influence on cinema. Discussion of previous adaptations, including Werner Herzog’s 1979 version. 12:00 – Eggers’ Filmmaking Style Comparison to Ridley Scott’s attention to detail and world-building. How Eggers adapts myths in The Northman, The Witch, and Nosferatu. 17:45 – Spoiler-Free Review Praise for the German Expressionist-inspired cinematography. Discussion of Lily-Rose Depp’s performance and Count Orlok’s menacing presence. The thought-provoking and ambiguous ending. 25:00 – Vampires in Cinema: A Cultural Lens How vampires have evolved from monstrous threats to sympathetic figures. Examples from Dracula (1931), Dark Shadows (1966), and Interview with the Vampire (1994). The resurgence of evil, monstrous vampires in recent films like Let the Right One In and The Last Voyage of the Demeter. 38:30 – Thematic Analysis of Nosferatu Count Orlok as a symbol of predation and isolation. Ellen’s mystical connection to Orlok and her ultimate sacrifice. Reflections on societal fears of disease, isolation, and evil. 50:00 – Final Thoughts and Recommendations How Eggers’ Nosferatu compares to his earlier films. Other films mentioned: The Lighthouse, The Witch, Herzog’s Nosferatu, and Let the Right One In. Upcoming episodes teased: Best of 2024, The Wolfman, and animation coverage. Where to Find Us: Website: Facebook: Podcast Network: Next Episode: Best Films of 2024 (tentative) /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/34819680

Episode 83: Heretic 12/11/2024

Episode 83: Heretic Podcast Episode Description: In this episode of Mindframes, Michael Cockerill and Dave Canfield dive into the chilling world of Heretic, the latest horror film by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods (A Quiet Place). We explore the film's themes of faith, control, and belief, contrasting its intellectual horror with its visceral thrills. Join us as we analyze Hugh Grant's standout performance as the sinister Mr. Reed, the dynamic interplay between the two Mormon missionaries, Sister Barnes and Sister Paxton, and the movie's ambiguous exploration of spirituality and skepticism. Whether you're intrigued by the film's intricate set design, its dialogue-driven narrative, or its controversial take on religious and philosophical themes, this episode is for you. We also share insights on how Heretic fits into the broader landscape of 2024's standout horror films, with comparisons to Hereditary, Get Out, and The Exorcist. Tune in to hear our recommendations and join the conversation about one of the year's most thought-provoking horror films. Podcast Summary with Timestamps 0:00 – 1:00 – Intro Michael and Dave introduce the episode, setting the stage for a deep dive into Heretic by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods. They touch on the directors’ previous works (A Quiet Place, Haunt) and their distinct horror style. 1:01 – 5:30 – Overview of Heretic A brief plot summary: Two Mormon missionaries, Sister Barnes (Sophie Thatcher) and Sister Paxton (Chloe East), find themselves trapped by Mr. Reed (Hugh Grant), whose philosophical and theological challenges evolve into a fight for survival. 5:31 – 12:00 – Themes of Faith and Control The hosts explore the film’s central themes, including the idea of religion as a mechanism of control versus a source of hope. Mr. Reed’s character embodies skepticism, while the missionaries represent differing interpretations of belief. 12:01 – 18:30 – Performances and Character Dynamics Hugh Grant’s portrayal of Mr. Reed is highlighted as a standout performance. The hosts delve into the dynamic between the sisters, contrasting Sister Barnes’ depth of faith with Sister Paxton’s cultural adherence. 18:31 – 24:00 – Set Design and Technical Elements A discussion on the film’s claustrophobic set design, the use of close-ups, and the intricate dollhouse motif that symbolizes control and manipulation. 24:01 – 30:00 – Comparisons to Other Films Connections are drawn to Hereditary, Get Out, and The Exorcist. The hosts note Heretic’s unique blend of intellectual and visceral horror and its place within 2024’s strong lineup of religious-themed horror films. 30:01 – 35:00 – Spoiler Section: Plot Twists and Ending A dive into the film’s third act and its ambiguous ending. The hosts debate whether the film effectively balances its critique of faith and religion with its horror elements. 35:01 – 40:00 – Final Thoughts and Recommendations Michael and Dave share their final impressions, recommending Heretic for its bold themes and strong performances. They reflect on how the film leaves viewers questioning belief, control, and the power of faith. 40:01 – End – Outro The hosts close the episode, previewing a potential future discussion on Conclave, another film tackling themes of faith and religion. They invite listeners to connect with Mindframes online and thank them for tuning in. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/34391145

Episode 82: The Substance 10/30/2024

Episode 82: The Substance Episode 82 on The Substance Summary In this episode, Michael and Dave dive into The Substance, a film by Coralie Fargeat. The film explores the dark and gritty side of Hollywood’s obsession with youth, following Elizabeth Sparkle (Demi Moore), a former aerobic star who turns to a mysterious serum for a youthful transformation. This risky choice leads her into a twisted psychological battle with her younger self, Sue (Margaret Qualley), as the two are forced to switch bodies every seven days. Key Discussion Points Plot Overview: The film's exploration of ageism, Hollywood’s beauty standards, and the battle between youthful ambition and the wisdom of age. Director’s Style: Coral Le Far’s cinematic techniques, reminiscent of her previous work in Revenge, and visual callbacks to classic horror films like The Shining and The Fly. Cinematography and Sound Design: Praise for cinematographer Benjamin Krakun and sound designer Emmanuel's Yard, creating a contrast between Hollywood’s bright artificiality and the film’s dark themes. Practical Effects: Emphasis on the effective use of prosthetics and 1980s-inspired effects over CGI, with comparisons to movies like The Thing and Requiem for a Dream. Memorable Moments Shrimp Scene: The “disgusting” and metaphorical close-up of Dennis Quaid’s character devouring shrimp, symbolizing Hollywood’s consumption of aging stars. Body Horror: Discussions on the intense practical effects, leading to some wince-inducing moments that play with medical horror aesthetics. Themes of Identity and Self-Worth: The hosts analyze how the film examines the lengths people go to in order to stay relevant and young, questioning the true “value” of beauty and fame. Ratings and Final Thoughts Michael gives the film four stars, highlighting its timely commentary on youth obsession, while Dave awards it five stars, calling it one of the best films of the year. Both agree on the standout performances by Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley, predicting Oscar buzz. Cultural Commentary The hosts reflect on Hollywood's commodification of beauty and youth, pointing out how the film exposes the industry’s relentless pursuit of “perfection” and the unrealistic standards imposed on women. Looking Forward Next episode, Michael and Dave consider reviewing Heretic, an A24 horror film, or exploring other films relevant to award season buzz. Connect with Us Visit our website or find us on Facebook at MindframesMovies for more insights, and feel free to reach out if you’d like to be a guest or suggest a movie! Introduction to The Substance 00:00:15 - Michael welcomes listeners and introduces the movie The Substance. Plot Summary & Themes 00:00:42 - Dave gives a brief overview of the film’s plot, focusing on Elizabeth Sparkle’s battle with her younger self, Sue. 00:02:17 - Michael and Dave discuss the film’s themes of ageism, youth obsession, and identity in Hollywood. Director and Cinematography 00:03:01 - Discussion of Coral Le Far’s style, including her previous work on Revenge and the “revenge movie” genre. 00:04:09 - Michael describes the vibrant color palette and camera work, including hallway shots reminiscent of The Shining. Shrimp Scene & Sound Design 00:05:34 - Michael and Dave analyze the infamous “shrimp scene” with Dennis Quaid’s character, highlighting the film’s sound design. 00:07:06 - Praise for Emmanuel’s Yard’s work on the sound effects, enhancing the visceral experience. Practical Effects and Body Horror 00:09:07 - Dave discusses the impressive practical effects, comparing them to The Thing and emphasizing the grotesque elements that made even seasoned horror fans look away. Discussion on Hollywood and Beauty Standards 00:13:38 - Michael and Dave explore the film’s commentary on Hollywood’s treatment of aging women and the pressures of beauty standards. Performances by Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley 00:14:22 - The hosts delve into the powerful performances, especially Demi Moore’s nuanced portrayal of Elizabeth, and Margaret Qualley’s rising-star status. Film References & Influences 00:50:38 - The hosts compare The Substance to other films like The Elephant Man, Frankenstein, The Fly, and Carrie, discussing how these influences shape the film’s narrative and aesthetic. Ratings and Spoiler-Free Reviews 00:17:09 - Michael and Dave each give their spoiler-free ratings, with Michael awarding four stars and Dave giving it five. Third-Act Discussion & Moral Takeaways 00:46:18 - Spoiler discussion on the third act, where the hosts interpret the film’s moral stance on aging, beauty, and acceptance. Closing and Next Episode Preview 00:57:04 - Dave previews potential films for the next episode, including Heretic, an A24 horror movie, as well as Rumors, a film featuring Tilda Swinton. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/33678827

Episode 81 - Megapolis 10/09/2024

Episode 80: Wolverine & Deadpool 08/07/2024

Episode 80: Wolverine & Deadpool Episode Summary: In this fun and lively episode, Michael and David take a break from their usual thematic deep dives to enjoy the highly anticipated film "Deadpool and Wolverine." Join them as they explore the movie's humor, fourth-wall breaks, cameos, and more. This episode is packed with laughs, insightful critiques, and a healthy dose of fan service. Key Discussion Points: Introduction (00:15 - 01:11): The usual format involves pulling out one theme from a movie, but this episode is kept light and free to match the film's tone. Introduction to "Deadpool and Wolverine," starring Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman. Director and Production (01:11 - 02:12): Directed by Sean Levy, who previously worked with Ryan Reynolds on "Free Guy." The film is described as a buddy comedy made by buddies. Humor and Fourth-Wall Breaks (02:12 - 06:35): The movie is filled with jokes, cameos, and references that require multiple viewings to catch all details. Outrageously violent and vulgar in keeping with Deadpool's character. Favorite Moments and Cameos (06:35 - 11:18): Highlights include cameos from Henry Cavill and Chris Evans. Discussion on how the film plays with meta-references and nostalgia. Comparisons and Critiques (11:18 - 13:54): Compared favorably to other superhero films like "Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness." Praised for its self-awareness and comedic tone. Fan Service (13:54 - 18:07): The film is described as fan service done right. Michael appreciates the movie for being honest about its intentions and serving the fans well. Character Development and Themes (18:07 - 34:48): Discussions on character growth, particularly for Wolverine and Deadpool. Use of iconic costumes and staying true to the characters' comic origins. Upcoming Films and Recommendations (34:48 - 48:45): Mentions of upcoming films like "Twisted Metal," "Long Legs," and "Alien Romulus." Recommendations for future episodes and a look at some intriguing trailers. Quotes: "This movie breaks the fourth wall so often you will literally need to see it twice just to get all of that." "I am a fan. Serve me." "It's a buddy comedy made by buddies." Final Thoughts (44:04 - 48:45): Michael and David agree that "Deadpool and Wolverine" is a fun ride with beloved characters, making it worth the watch. The episode ends with a look forward to future movies and potential podcast topics. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/32467727

Episode 79: Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga 06/11/2024

Episode 79: Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga Mind Frames Podcast - Episode 79: Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga Overview: In this episode, Michael and Dave delve into the newest installment of the Mad Max universe, Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga. Directed by George Miller, this film explores the origin story of Imperator Furiosa, previously portrayed by Charlize Theron in Mad Max: Fury Road, now played by Anya Taylor-Joy. Join the hosts as they discuss the film's thematic elements, casting choices, and how it fits into the larger Mad Max franchise. Key Topics: Introduction to Mind Frames (00:00 - 00:24) Overview of the podcast and the format of the show. Film Introduction (00:25 - 00:52) Introduction of Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga. Brief synopsis and connection to Mad Max: Fury Road. Discussion on George Miller (01:43 - 03:33) George Miller’s influence on the post-apocalyptic genre. His versatility as a filmmaker with works like Babe and Happy Feet. Thematic Elements in George Miller’s Films (03:35 - 06:32) Themes of human society’s impact on the world. Comparison of themes across Miller’s diverse filmography. Casting Choices (07:21 - 10:51) Anya Taylor-Joy’s performance as Furiosa. Physical and stylistic differences between Anya Taylor-Joy and Charlize Theron. Discussion of Chris Hemsworth’s role as Dementus and his comedic influence. Character Analysis (10:55 - 12:31) Examination of Furiosa’s character development. Comparison between Furiosa in Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga and Mad Max: Fury Road. Chris Hemsworth as Dementus (15:45 - 19:17) Analysis of Hemsworth’s performance and character. Discussion on the balance of humor and menace in his role. Immortan Joe and Prequels (19:18 - 22:06) Role of Immortan Joe in Furiosa. Challenges of integrating iconic characters into prequels. Supporting Characters (23:05 - 26:04) Discussion on Tom Burke’s character and his role in Furiosa’s story. Critique of the necessity of his character in the narrative. Cinematography and Visuals (27:24 - 30:14) Comparison of cinematography in Furiosa and Fury Road. Use of CGI and its impact on the film’s visual appeal. Action Sequences (30:15 - 31:33) Overview of the film’s action sequences and stunt work. Comparison to other action movies of the year. Box Office Performance and Marketing (31:34 - 42:31) Discussion on the film’s box office performance. Analysis of marketing strategies and their impact on the film’s reception. Cultural Impact and Audience Reception (42:32 - 50:01) Broader discussion on the cultural impact of the film. Comparison of audience reception across different demographics. Final Thoughts and Recommendations (50:01 - 53:01) Hosts’ final thoughts on Furiosa. Recommendations for exploring more of George Miller’s work. Conclusion: Michael and Dave conclude the episode with reflections on George Miller’s filmmaking career and the significance of Furiosa within the Mad Max franchise. They also touch upon broader trends in the film industry and audience preferences. Next Episode: ????? Follow Us: - Website: [mindframesfilm.com](http://mindframesfilm.com) - Network: [Now Playing Network](http://nowplaying.org) /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/31698052

Episode 78 I Saw the TV Glow 05/31/2024

Episode 77: Civil War 05/07/2024

Episode 77: Civil War The Complexities of "Civil War" and the Intricacies of Alex Garland's Direction In this episode of "Mindframes," hosts Dave and M.W. Cockerill delve into Alex Garland's latest film, "Civil War," exploring its portrayal of a polarized America and the role of media in war contexts. The discussion traverses Garland's filmography, highlighting his distinctive approach to filmmaking and thematic consistency across his works. The episode also touches on broader film genres, notably the categorization challenges within horror and zombie films, using "28 Days Later" as a focal point. Key Discussion Points 1. **Alex Garland's Directorial Style:** Insight into Garland's evolution as a director, with a detailed discussion on his notable films including "Ex Machina," "Annihilation," and "Men." The hosts explore how these films align thematically with "Civil War." 2. **Genre Definitions and Controversies:** A lively debate on what constitutes a zombie film, referencing "28 Days Later" and other genre films like "The Walking Dead" and "I Am Legend." 3. **"Civil War" - A Film Analysis:** - **Plot and Setting:** Examination of the film's setting in a dystopian America, discussing the world-building elements and the narrative's focus on societal breakdown. - **Character Development and Performances:** Discussion on the character arcs, particularly focusing on the performances of Kristen Dunst and other key actors. - **Themes:** Deep dive into the political and social themes portrayed in the film, such as division, media influence, and the impact of leadership styles reminiscent of contemporary political figures. - **Cinematic Techniques:** Analysis of Garland's use of visual and sound design to enhance the thematic depth and emotional impact of the film. Special Segments - **Horror Film Debate:** Is "Civil War" a horror movie? Hosts debate the genre specifications and the broader implications of genre categorization in film. - **Viewer Reactions and Interpretations:** Exploration of varied audience reactions to the film, particularly focusing on its political commentary and its reflection of real-world tensions. Closing Thoughts - The hosts reflect on the implications of "Civil War" for future filmmaking in politically charged climates. - Recommendations for audiences on how to approach the film to gain a deeper understanding of its themes. **Where to Watch:** "Civil War" is currently in wide release and available exclusively in theaters, including IMAX. **Episode Links:** - Stream this episode and subscribe to "Mindframes" on iTunes, Spotify, Google Play, and wherever podcasts are available. - Visit our website at mindframesfilms.com for more insights and discussions. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/31168847

Episode 76 - Dune 2 04/01/2024

Episode 76 - Dune 2 Episode 76, "Navigating the Sands of Dune Part Two" Episode Summary: In this enthralling episode, Michael and Dave embark on a journey through the expansive deserts of Denis Villeneuve's "Dune Part Two." From the continuation of Paul Atreides' epic saga to the deep philosophical underpinnings of messianism and political intrigue, the hosts dissect the film's thematic complexities and its directorial prowess. Join us as we compare Villeneuve's adaptation to its cinematic and literary predecessors, speculate on the potential directions for the franchise, and reflect on the broader impact of "Dune" on the future of film and cinema culture. Show Notes: [00:00:00] - Introduction to "Mind Frames" and today's focus on "Dune Part Two." [00:01:30] - Overview of "Dune Part Two," including its narrative continuation from "Dune Part One" and initial thoughts on the film's impact. [00:05:00] - Deep dive into Denis Villeneuve's directorial style, examining how his vision and thematic focus contribute to the "Dune" universe. [00:10:45] - Analysis of religious and political themes in "Dune Part Two," exploring the portrayal of Paul Atreides as a messianic figure and the interplay between faith and power. [00:20:30] - Comparison with previous "Dune" adaptations, including the 1984 film, and discussion on the challenges and successes of Villeneuve's approach. [00:30:00] - Speculation on future films in the "Dune" series, potential plot developments, and the continuation of thematic exploration. [00:40:00] - The cultural impact of "Dune" and its significance in the context of modern cinema. Discussion on the shift from traditional movie-going experiences to streaming platforms and "Dune's" role in this evolution. [00:50:00] - Closing thoughts on "Dune Part Two" and its place in the pantheon of science fiction cinema. [00:55:00] - Final remarks and preview of the next episode of "Mind Frames." Resources Mentioned: Denis Villeneuve's Filmography "Dune" by Frank Herbert "Blade Runner 2049" and its thematic parallels with "Dune" The cultural phenomenon of movie-going as an event and its future Connect with Us: Email: or [email protected] Website: mindframesfilm.com /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/30629188

Episode 75: Mindframe(s) 2023, five not to miss 02/05/2024

Episode 74: Fremont 09/19/2023

Episode 73: Barbie 08/28/2023

Episode 72: Oppenheimer 08/02/2023

Episode 71: 2023 Summer Blockbusters 07/20/2023

Mindframe(s)

TOPICS