Mindframe(s)

Each week Dave and Michael talk about film and where it fits in the larger social story.

Episode 111: Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die 02/23/2026

Episode 111: Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die 🎬 Mindframes Show Notes Episode 111 — Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die Film Credits Film: Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die Director: Gore Verbinski Writer: Matthew Robinson Starring: Sam Rockwell, Juno Temple, Michael Peña, Zazie Beetz, Haley Lu Richardson Genre: Sci-Fi / Time-Loop Thriller / Dark Comedy Release Year: 2025 IMDb: (Insert official link when available) Episode Summary Michael and Dave explore Gore Verbinski’s genre-blending sci-fi film Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die, a time-loop story about a soldier attempting to stop a rogue artificial intelligence across repeated attempts. What begins as a chaotic, humorous sci-fi premise unfolds into a deeper philosophical discussion about repetition, control, and emotional detachment. Is the film a messy but ambitious meditation on gamified existence, or does its spectacle drown its humanity? The hosts debate whether infinite retries lead to growth — or erode meaning altogether. Thematic Discussion (Three-Sentence Core) The episode examines whether repetition creates growth or emotional numbness. Unlike Groundhog Day, where the protagonist is trapped until he becomes empathetic, this film presents a character who can reset at will — raising the question of whether control over repetition removes the stakes of human experience. Ultimately, the discussion centers on whether hope lies in continuing the loop — or in learning to step outside it. Episode Breakdown & Timestamps Time Segment 00:00 Intro — Welcome to Mindframes and film setup 00:40 Synopsis and premise discussion 02:40 Gore Verbinski’s career and stylistic traits 06:15 Verbinski themes — characters trapped in systems 09:30 Writer Matthew Robinson and situational storytelling 12:45 Sam Rockwell as the emotional anchor of the film 15:45 Supporting cast: Juno Temple, Michael Peña, Zazie Beetz 17:40 Visual style, cinematography, and production design 19:45 Dave’s review — spectacle, fun, and cinematic experience 22:10 Michael’s review — messiness, tonal imbalance, and structure 27:00 Debate: Is the film visually spectacular? 33:00 Entering the Spoiler Section 34:00 Gamification and repetition as thematic core 36:00 Comparison to Groundhog Day — control vs entrapment 40:00 Hope, imperfection, and persistence (Dave’s perspective) 43:30 Emotional detachment and numbness (Michael’s perspective) 47:00 Does Sam Rockwell’s character actually grow? 52:00 Homage, pastiche, and borrowing from genre films 56:00 Cult status, box office, and AI films in context 59:30 AI as character vs plot device — comparison to HAL End Closing reflections Final Ratings Dave: ★★★★☆ (4/5) A messy but engaging film where persistence, relationships, and the journey matter more than perfection. Michael: ★★★☆☆ (3/5) Ambitious and thought-provoking, but structurally uneven and emotionally diluted by spectacle. Contact & Follow 🌐 Website: 📘 Facebook: 🎙 Now Playing Network: 📧 Email: /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/40195935

Episode 110 - Send Help 02/11/2026

Episode 110 - Send Help Episode 110 — Send Help Film Credits Title: Send Help Director: Sam Raimi Starring: Rachel McAdams, Dylan O’Brien, Dennis Haysbert, Chris Pang Genre: Survival Thriller / Dark Comedy / Psychological Horror Episode Summary In this episode, Michael and David examine Sam Raimi’s Send Help, a survival thriller about two corporate survivors stranded on a deserted island after a plane crash. What begins as a struggle for survival turns into a psychological battle for power, identity, and control. The discussion focuses heavily on Linda’s transformation — whether the island reveals her true nature or corrupts her — and what the film suggests about power, resentment, and human nature. Three-Sentence Thematic Core Send Help explores what happens when social hierarchies collapse and survival becomes the only currency. The film questions whether power corrupts or merely reveals what was already present within a person. Linda’s journey suggests a darker possibility: that the oppressed may replicate the very systems that once diminished them. Main Discussion Topic 1 — Linda’s Transformation Starts as overlooked, competent, underappreciated worker Gains survival power → shifts into control and manipulation Film asks: Was this always Linda, or did the island create her? Topic 2 — Power and Reversal Corporate hierarchy collapses on the island Linda becomes capable / Bradley becomes helpless Echoes Triangle of Sadness: oppressed gaining power Topic 3 — Cynicism vs Revelation Linda mirrors the cruelty she once suffered The film may betray the “underdog triumph” trope Ending suggests survival ≠ moral growth Topic 4 — Raimi Style and Tone Mix of dark humor, physical horror, and thriller tension Use of Raimi-cam and kinetic physicality Balance between comedy, brutality, and psychological tension Topic 5 — Thin Plot, Strong Character Core Narrative is minimal: two people, one island, shifting dominance Rachel McAdams’ performance carries emotional and thematic weight Film remains engaging through physical tension and character conflict Episode Ratings David: 4 / 5 Michael: 3 / 5 Strengths: Performance (McAdams) Physical humor and tension Raimi stylistic energy Weaknesses: Thin premise Murky ending Uneven CGI realism Closing / Contact Mindframes Film Podcast mindframesfilm.com Now Playing Network Facebook /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/40069840

Episode 109: 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple 01/23/2026

Episode 109: 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (2026) Episode Summary: In this episode, Michael and Dave dissect 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, the most visually ambitious and thematically rich installment in the iconic 28 Days Later franchise. They explore the film’s eerie cult narrative, psychological undercurrents, and the shifting horror dynamics that turn humans into the real monsters. With Nia DaCosta in the director’s chair and Alex Garland returning as writer, the film blends horror, satire, and surprising moments of hope. A rich conversation for fans of speculative horror and social allegory. 🎬 Cast & Crew Details – Who Made This Film and Why It Matters Director: Nia DaCosta (Candyman, The Marvels, Little Woods) Writer: Alex Garland (Ex Machina, Annihilation, Men, 28 Days Later) Cinematographer: Sean Bobbitt (12 Years a Slave, Widows, Hunger) Key Cast: Ralph Fiennes as Dr. Ian Kelson – a monument builder and reluctant scientist Alfie Williams as Spike – a returning survivor struggling with identity Jack O’Connell as Jimmy Crystal – the chilling, charismatic cult leader Chai Lewis-Perry as Samson – a towering infected in the midst of transformation ⏱️ Timestamps & Topics – Your Guide Through the Conversation Time Topic 00:00 Opening Banter & Setting the Stage for Bone Temple 00:41 Introducing the Film – Context Within the Franchise 01:19 Directorial Approach: Nia DaCosta’s Vision & Filmography 02:24 Comparing to 2025’s 28 Years Later – Evolution or Echo? 04:18 Characters Returning & The Cult of the Jimmies Introduced 07:34 Revisiting the Franchise’s Viral Origins & Setting 10:01 Plot Overview: Bone Temples, Cults, and Scientific Obsession 10:44 Cinematography Upgrades & Visual Tone Shifts 13:26 Danny Boyle’s Influence & Where DaCosta Departs 15:38 Narrative Tightness vs. Thematic Breadth 16:23 Box Office Woes & The "January Dump" Conspiracy 17:35 Jimmy Crystal as a Breakout Villain 18:18 Spoiler-Free Reviews: Performances, Style, and Reception 21:46 Ralph Fiennes’ Complex Turn as Dr. Kelson 23:32 Missteps in Marketing & Missed Opportunities 26:20 Themes vs. Advertising: What the Film Really Offers 27:26 Final Thoughts and Personal Ratings ⚠️ Spoiler Discussion Highlights – Deeper Themes, Arcs, and Revelations The Jimmies as Symbol & Horror: The gang discusses how the Jimmies reflect societal decay, inspired by the real-life figure of Jimmy Savile. Their cultish behavior and unflinching cruelty mirror deeper fears about manipulation, lost innocence, and the rot at the core of community leadership. Samson’s Redemption Arc: A standout element of the film, Samson’s transformation from infected monster to near-human symbolizes the potential for recovery even in corrupted bodies and minds. His scenes with Dr. Kelson evoke tenderness, contrast with the Jimmies’ savagery, and challenge the notion of what makes someone "monstrous." Human Evil vs. Infected Violence: The conversation explores how the infected, though dangerous, follow instinct—while the Jimmies choose cruelty. This blurs the line between traditional "monster" narratives and moral horror, echoing themes from Lord of the Flies and The Road. Visual Juxtaposition of Horror and Beauty: Bone temples, lush landscapes, and surreal moments (like cloud-gazing while high) create a strange harmony. These sequences ask whether beauty can exist in a world of collapse and whether healing is possible amid trauma. Cultural Legacy & Genre Evolution: Dave and Michael reflect on how the 28 franchise redefined the zombie genre, and how Bone Temple may mark a new phase—one that values emotional depth and psychological horror as much as jump scares. Mentioned in this Episode: Films: Candyman (2021), Widows, Red Dragon, Gangs of London, Deluge (1933) Cultural Figures: Jimmy Savile, Mr. Rogers Literary/Genre References: Lord of the Flies, The Walking Dead, Mad Max, Godzilla Connect with Us: Website: /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/39822130

Episode 108- What can we expect for 2026? 01/19/2026

Episode 108- What can we expect for 2026? Show Notes Film / Topic Title: Looking to 2026: The Future of Cinema Focus: Industry trends, cultural anxieties, and the most anticipated films of 2026 IMDb: N/A (discussion episode) Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and David look ahead to 2026 and ask a deceptively simple question: what kind of year will it be for movies? Coming off what they consider a creatively rich—but commercially uneven—2025, the conversation explores the tension between artistic vitality and economic uncertainty. From box office struggles and bloated marketing budgets to shifting audience habits and global cinema’s rising influence, the hosts balance cautious concern with genuine excitement for what’s coming next. Themes & Discussion Theme 1 – Cinema Thriving Creatively, Struggling Economically While 2025 delivered exceptional films and performances, many acclaimed movies failed to connect with large audiences. The episode interrogates whether this gap reflects streaming habits, rising costs, marketing excess, or deeper cultural fatigue with the theatrical model. Theme 2 – Event Movies vs. Personal Cinema The hosts contrast massive IP-driven releases (Avengers: Doomsday, Dune: Part Three, Toy Story 5) with filmmaker-driven projects from auteurs like Nolan, Villeneuve, Gerwig, Eggers, Spielberg, and Iñárritu—questioning whether spectacle alone can sustain moviegoing culture. Theme 3 – Hope Through Global & Generational Shifts Despite storm clouds, there are signs of renewal: Gen Z showing renewed interest in theaters, international films breaking through, and genre cinema thriving on modest budgets. The episode argues that cinema isn’t dying—it’s recalibrating. Timestamps Time Topic 00:00 Intro & framing the question of 2026 05:30 Why 2025 was a great creative year 12:00 Box office disappointments & marketing excess 22:00 Streaming, audience fatigue, and cultural shifts 34:00 Big tentpoles vs. auteur-driven films 47:00 Superhero fatigue & the future of franchises 58:00 Dune, Nolan, Spielberg, and prestige cinema 01:12:00 Horror, genre films, and low-budget success stories 01:25:00 Why there’s still reason to be hopeful 01:32:00 Final thoughts on where cinema is heading Hosts Michael Cockerill David Canfield Contact & Links 🌐 📘 Facebook: Mindframes Film 🎧 Now Playing Network ✉️ /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/39777320

Episode 107 - The Mindframes top 10 of 2025 01/09/2026

Episode 107 - The Mindframes top 10 of 2025 Mindframes — Best of 2025 Episode Title Best Films of 2025 — Trends, Themes, and the State of Cinema Film Information This is a multi‑film recap episode. Primary Shared Films Discussed: Weapons Eddington Hamnet Sinners One Battle After Another Train Dreams Universal Language Frankenstein Additional Films Referenced: It Was Just an Accident Ebony and Ivory Sirât The Zone of Interest Everything Everywhere All at Once Avatar: Fire and Ash Episode Summary In this year‑end episode of Mindframes, Michael Cockerill and David Canfield look back on what they agree was one of the strongest years in cinema in recent memory. Rather than ranking films strictly by quality, the discussion centers on how 2025’s movies reflected the emotional, cultural, and political realities of the moment. The hosts explore major technical trends—such as the return of controlled formalism, the renewed importance of sound design, and a more disciplined use of CGI—before turning to deeper thematic currents running through the year’s films. Across genres, 2025 cinema repeatedly grappled with loss, systemic failure, alienation, and the fragile possibility of hope. The episode concludes with personal picks, shared favorites, and a defense of films that dared to resist cynicism through human connection and formal craft. Themes & Discussion Controlled Formalism Returns Many of the standout films of 2025 rejected frenetic camera work in favor of classical composition—locked‑off shots, wide frames, symmetry, and negative space. This stylistic restraint allowed emotion to emerge gradually rather than being chased by the camera. Films like Hamnet exemplified how formal discipline can deepen emotional resonance and restore cinematic patience. Sound, Silence, and the Off‑Screen World Sound design emerged as a dominant expressive tool, often prioritizing diegetic and off‑screen audio over traditional sweeping scores. Silence itself became a source of tension, especially in horror, where absence of sound replaced musical cues. This trend reflects both creative evolution and the challenge of balancing theatrical sound design with home viewing habits. Loss, Systems, and the Crisis of Hope Across genres, filmmakers returned obsessively to stories of missing or dead children, institutional collapse, and moral ambiguity. These narratives frame despair as a defining emotional condition of the era, while asking whether hope can survive systemic pressure. Some films embraced the darkness; others, like Universal Language, quietly resisted it through small acts of human connection. ⏱ Timestamp Breakdown Time Topic 00:00 Episode introduction & format 02:00 Why 2025 was a great year for film 03:00 Controlled formalism & visual trends 07:00 Superhero films & genre reinvention 10:00 Sound design, silence, and scoring 18:00 CGI vs practical effects 21:00 Lighting: flat vs dynamic 25:00 Thematic trends: children, systems, despair 32:00 Criteria for personal picks 35:00 Dave’s picks: Train Dreams & Ebony and Ivory 42:00 Michael’s picks: It Was Just an Accident & Universal Language 50:00 Shared Top Films discussion 1:18:00 Final reflections on cinema & culture Hosts Michael Cockerill David Canfield Links & Contact 🌐 📘 Facebook 🎧 Now Playing Network ✉️ Mindframes is a sometimes half‑assed but always wholehearted conversation about film, culture, and the moments that shape us. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/39669940

Epsode 106 - Hamnet 12/13/2025

Epsode 106 - Hamnet 🎧 Episode Title: Hamnet and the Ghosts We Inherit 🎮 Film Discussed: Hamnet (2025) 🗓️ Release Date: December 13, 2025 🎧 Hosts: Michael & David ⏱️ Timestamps & Highlights: 00:00 – Intro Michael and David introduce the show and kick off discussion of Hamnet, Chloe Zhao's adaptation of Maggie O'Farrell's novel. 00:48 – Film Overview Chloe Zhao's recent directorial triumph, premiere at TIFF, her filmography from Nomadland to Eternals, and Hamnet's awards buzz. 02:23 – Plot & Themes The story centers on Agnes Hathaway and her marriage to Shakespeare, their shared grief over their son Hamnet's death, and how personal loss influenced artistic creation. 04:11 – Cinematography by Lukasz Zal Discussion of Zal's previous work (The Zone of Interest, Loving Vincent), his visual storytelling, use of natural light, and the film's stunning forest imagery. 06:15 – Book Origins and Historical Context Exploration of Maggie O'Farrell's novel, historical liberties, Shakespeare's personal life, and their dramatized relationship. 10:00 – Jesse Buckley as Agnes Performance praise and her emotional depth, evolution from earlier roles (I'm Thinking of Ending Things, The Lost Daughter). 17:00 – Paul Mescal as Shakespeare A restrained but complex portrayal. Debate over his reception compared to Buckley's, and reflections on artistic introspection. 23:00 – Visual Language & Direction Comparison to Zone of Interest, Chloe Zhao's style (landscapes, close-ups), forest symbolism, and interiority of grief. 30:00 – Pacing & Emotional Resonance Defense of the film's slow pace, importance of patient visuals, and building emotional payoff. 35:00 – Art vs Family Sacrifice Broader film trends about artistic sacrifice, complexity of Shakespeare as a father, and cultural reflections. 45:00 – Critical Response & Awards Speculation David and Michael reflect on Oscars potential, critical responses, and "devastating" as a recurring descriptor. 47:00 – Third Act & Theatrical Closure A spoiler-free nod to the finale's emotional crescendo, visual poetry, and synthesis of nature and performance. 50:00 – Final Reviews Michael gives it 5 stars, calls it a career-best for Buckley; David praises its emotional impact and timeless resonance. 🧠 Final Takeaways: Theme(s): Grief, art as legacy, sacrifice, nature vs language, emotional communication, family and connection. Mindframe(s) Rating: 5/5 haunted honeybees 🐝 Listener Question: How do you process grief—through nature, through storytelling, or something else entirely? /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/39396510

Episode 105 - Bugonia 11/11/2025

Episode 105 - Bugonia Bugonia Directed by: Yorgos Lanthimos Written by: Will Tracy and Jang Joon-hwan Starring: Emma Stone, Jesse Plemons, Aiden Delvis, Alicia Silverstone, Stavros Halkias Cinematography: Not specified (shot on VistaVision, 35mm, Willcam equipment) Release: 2025 IMDB: 🎧 Episode Summary In this episode, Dave and Michael dive deep into Bugonia, the latest satirical and enigmatic offering from Yorgos Lanthimos. With a plot centering on two conspiracy-minded men who kidnap a powerful CEO they believe to be an alien, the hosts explore Lanthimos' signature blend of absurdism, social critique, and tonal precision. The conversation touches on thematic elements like power hierarchies, detachment from humanity, and the inescapable dynamics of empathy. Throughout, Dave and Michael reflect on Lanthimos' evolving filmography, his standout collaborations with Emma Stone, and the fascinating psychological and visual language of the film. 🧠 Thematic Discussion Bugonia offers a searing satire of corporate detachment, power inversion, and societal alienation. The film explores how humanity is distorted by institutional power, media messaging, and emotional denial. Through its bizarre plot and aesthetic choices, it challenges viewers to empathize with morally gray characters and question the systems that produce them. ⏱️ Major Segments & Timestamps Time Segment Description 00:00 Introduction Dave and Michael introduce the episode and set the tone with a brief synopsis of Bugonia. 01:00 Yorgos Lanthimos' Filmography Discussion of Lanthimos’ previous works like The Favourite, Poor Things, The Lobster, and how Bugonia fits into his oeuvre. 03:00 Themes of Power & Hierarchy Analysis of power dynamics and hierarchical inversions common in Lanthimos' films. 06:00 Empathy and Detachment Examination of how the film toys with emotional distance and the audience’s capacity to empathize. 10:00 Emma Stone's Performance A focus on Stone's physicality, transformation, and recurring collaborations with Lanthimos. 13:00 Supporting Cast Breakdown of performances by Jesse Plemons, Alicia Silverstone, Stavros Halkias, and Aiden Delvis. 20:00 Visual Style & Cinematography Conversation about the film’s use of camera angles, lens choice, lighting, and aspect ratio to reflect power and control. 25:00 Corporate Satire & Alien Allegory The hosts unpack the film’s critique of corporate culture and dehumanization. 33:00 Spoiler Territory A deeper dive into specific scenes, character arcs, and philosophical implications, including a heated debate on "inhumanity" and moral ambiguity. 🌐 Contact & Links Website: Facebook: Network: Email: /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/38993120

Episode 104: Frankenstein (2025) 11/03/2025

Episode 104: Frankenstein (2025) Mindframes Podcast: Frankenstein (2025) Directed by: Guillermo del Toro Written by: Guillermo del Toro, based on the novel by Mary Shelley Starring: Oscar Isaac (Victor Frankenstein), Jacob Elordi (The Creature), Christoph Waltz (Von Klemper), Mia Goth (Elizabeth/Claire Frankenstein), Charles Dance, Ralph Ineson, and David Bradley Cinematography: Dan Laustsen Release: 2025 (Netflix) IMDB: 🎧 Episode Summary Dave and Michael explore Guillermo del Toro’s long-awaited adaptation of Frankenstein — a film that blends gothic horror, Catholic melodrama, and emotional fantasy. They discuss del Toro’s lifelong fascination with monsters, the film’s lavish design, and how it rehumanizes one of literature’s most tragic creations. The conversation dives into themes of creation, responsibility, and the eternal bond between monster and maker, while connecting the film to the long cinematic history of Frankenstein. 🧠 Thematic Discussion The hosts highlight del Toro’s Frankenstein as both a love letter to monster cinema and a meditation on faith, class, and parenthood filtered through a Latin American Catholic lens. They note how del Toro’s signature gothic romanticism tempers horror with empathy, positioning the creature as both victim and philosopher. Ultimately, they frame the film as a study of what it means to create—and to be responsible for what we bring into the world. ⏱️ Major Segments & Timestamps Time Segment Description 00:00 Introduction Dave and Michael introduce Frankenstein (2025) and Guillermo del Toro’s career-long passion for the story. 02:00 Del Toro’s Vision Discussion of del Toro’s love for classic monster films, “monster kids” culture, and gothic influence. 06:30 Cinematography & Design Michael details Dan Laustsen’s visual approach, lighting style, and practical effects. 10:00 Cast Overview Breakdown of performances: Oscar Isaac’s intense Victor, Jacob Elordi’s soulful creature, Christoph Waltz’s enigmatic benefactor, and Mia Goth’s dual role. 12:30 Visual & Thematic Tone The hosts debate whether the movie’s look favors Netflix’s small screen or theatrical presentation. 15:00 Spoiler-Free Reviews Both hosts offer initial impressions and star ratings (Michael: ★★★, Dave: ★★★★½). 21:40 Frankenstein Through History A deep dive into past adaptations—from the silent era to Hammer Horror, to Branagh’s 1994 version—and how portrayals of the monster evolved. 30:00 The Mad Scientist Trope Comparing Victor Frankenstein to mad scientists through film history, including Cushing, Clive, and Branagh. 36:00 Modern Takes & Decline They explore recent attempts to revive the story (Victor Frankenstein, I, Frankenstein) and why few have matched its cultural power. 39:00 Del Toro’s Achievement Did he deliver the definitive Frankenstein? Dave says yes—an affectionate, gothic triumph for lifelong fans. 40:30 Outro & Next Episode Tease for the next episode on Bugonia, the follow-up collaboration from Poor Things director Yorgos Lanthimos. 🌐 Contact & Links Website: Facebook: Network: Email: Reach the team via their assistant “Abby Normal” at /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/38888405

Epsiode 103: Anemone 10/16/2025

Epsiode 103: Anemone Episode 103: Anemone 🎬 Principal Cast & Crew Director: Ronan Day-Lewis (feature debut) Writers: Ronan Day-Lewis & Daniel Day-Lewis Cinematography: Ben Fordsman Main Cast: Daniel Day-Lewis as Ray Sean Bean as Jem Samantha Morton as Nessa Stoker Samuel Bottomley as Brian Stoker Safiya Oakley-Green as Hattie 🕰️ Episode Breakdown 00:00 – Intro & Overview Michael and Dave introduce Anemone, a moody psychological drama and feature debut by Ronan Day-Lewis, starring his father Daniel Day-Lewis. They tease the film’s atmospheric visuals, layered performances, and thematic heft. 01:25 – Plot Summary Dave summarizes the plot: Ray (Daniel Day-Lewis), a haunted recluse in rural England, is visited by his brother Jem (Sean Bean), prompting a confrontation with past traumas, estrangement, and the question of familial reconciliation. 02:50 – Visual Aesthetic & Cinematography The hosts explore the film’s striking use of natural light, magical realism, and “damp, green” Northern England landscapes, captured by cinematographer Ben Fordsman. The weather acts as a near-character in the story. 05:50 – Symbolism & Style Michael critiques some symbolic elements and magical realism as heavy-handed. Dave defends their emotional resonance. Both agree the film shows great directorial promise despite moments of overreach. 08:52 – Cast Discussion Daniel Day-Lewis: Praised for his intensity, though some monologues feel forced due to script limitations. Potential Oscar buzz. Sean Bean: Commended for nuance and believability in a rare emotionally rich role. Samantha Morton: Strong but underwritten role as the estranged wife. Supporting Cast: Critique of thinly developed side characters, including son Brian and friend Hattie—sparking a broader conversation on representation in modern cinema. 31:00 – Reviews Dave: ★★★☆☆ – “Solid film with strong performances; a bit drawn out but emotionally effective.” Michael: ★★★½☆ – “Visually compelling with a stacked cast. First-time director missteps but shows real talent.” 39:00 – Thematic Deep Dive: Masculine Emotional Suppression The second half focuses on the film’s central theme: male emotional repression—especially within British working-class culture. Ray’s emotional barricades, military trauma, and the generational consequences are dissected. 46:00 – Symbolism of the Anemone Flower Michael interprets the title’s metaphor: a subtle inheritance from the father, symbolizing buried emotion and unprocessed trauma blooming in isolation. 52:00 – Comparative Film Talk Mentions of The Lighthouse, Tree of Life, Phantom Thread, and The Witch as points of stylistic and thematic comparison. 59:00 – Closing Banter Discussion of upcoming episodes (likely Frankenstein by Guillermo del Toro), humorous talk of “OnlyVans” and critic calendars, and shoutouts to listeners and fellow reviewers. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/38601920

Episode 102: One Battle After Another 10/11/2025

Episode 101: The Long Walk 09/18/2025

Episode 100: The Roses 08/26/2025

Episode 99 - Weapons 08/17/2025

Episode 99 - Weapons 🎧 Episode 99: Weapons – Horror, Mystery, and Institutions in Crisis In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave welcome special guest Tim Peebles—theologian, pastor, martial artist, and long-time film aficionado—for a deep dive into Zach Cregger’s new film Weapons. Cregger, known for Barbarian (2022), returns with a multi-layered, genre-bending thriller where a small town unravels after its children mysteriously disappear into the night. With a Rashomon-style narrative, striking cinematography from Larkin Seiple (Everything Everywhere All at Once), and a cast led by Josh Brolin, Julia Garner, and Benedict Wong, Weapons pushes the boundaries of modern horror. 🔑 Topics We Discuss The intense bidding war for the film—why even Jordan Peele wanted it How the script stayed almost entirely intact from page to screen A Rashomon-inspired structure and its effect on pacing and suspense Cinematic homages: from Magnolia to The Shining to Italian giallo classics Performances: Brolin’s rugged father figure, Garner’s demanding lead role, and Wong’s unexpected turn as a school principal Themes of institutional failure (schools, police, community) and whether the film offers political commentary The balance of horror, comedy, and surreal mystery that keeps audiences hooked 🎬 Why It Matters Weapons is more than just another horror release—it’s a cultural reflection on distrust of institutions, layered with dread, dark humor, and unforgettable imagery. Our conversation unpacks how Cregger masterfully controls tone, from the eerie to the playful, while still delivering an unnerving ride. ⭐ Ratings Dave: 4–4.5 stars – “A thrill ride you’ll want to rewatch.” Michael: 3.5–4 stars – “Ambitious, mixed-genre storytelling with a few tonal bumps.” Tim: Highly recommends – “Dreadful and beautiful, horrifying and humorous—Cregger’s step up from Barbarian.” /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/37849465

Episode 98: Eddington 07/24/2025

Episode 98: Eddington Film Overview Title: Eddington (2025) by Ari Aster Setting: Small-town New Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic Premise: Tension and division between a local sheriff (Joaquin Phoenix) and the town's mayor (Pedro Pascal), reflecting broader cultural and social fractures in America. Themes: Polarization, the influence of social media, performative activism, the corporatization of crisis, and the psychological weight of 2020. Cast & Performances Joaquin Phoenix (Sheriff Joe Cross): Widely praised for his layered, committed performance. Considered perfect for the role. Pedro Pascal (Mayor Ted Garcia): Serves as a foil to Phoenix’s sheriff. Also well-cast, though not a co-lead. Emma Stone: Mixed feelings about her casting due to age and tone. Some discussion of alternative casting. Austin Butler: Divisive but ultimately defended. His character is seen as representative of evangelical or conspiracy-driven youth. A recurring homeless man character is discussed as a possible metaphor for society’s ignored truths or the prophetic outsider. Cinematography & Technical Merits Director of Photography: Darius Khondji (corrected after initially being misattributed to Bruno Delbonnel) Visuals praised as among the best of the year—shot in New Mexico using real locations, lighting used to evoke horror pacing and psychological tension. Stylistic comparisons to Hereditary and Seven. Return of Ari Aster's visual motifs: isolation, daylight-to-night transitions, and symbolic elevation (e.g., houses on hills). Genre & Stylistic Notes Described as: “Not quite a horror film, but horror-influenced” A blend of satire, tragedy, psychological thriller, dark comedy, and drama Compared to: No Country for Old Men (tone and landscape) Robert Altman’s Nashville (ensemble structure and social chaos) King of Comedy and Taxi Driver (Scorsese comparisons in the spoiler section) Rejection of Coen Brothers comparisons as too simplistic Thematic Analysis (Spoiler Section) Fragmentation of Reality: The main theme is how social media algorithms and performative digital culture drive people apart. Bothsides-ism: The film avoids heroes or villains; it's more about the system manipulating everyone. Performative Activism: Especially embodied in the youth protest scenes—young people react to national injustices despite their local irrelevance. Corporate Exploitation: A data center being built in the town is the real power move while townsfolk are distracted by culture wars. The Sheriff as a Symbol: Joe Cross embodies both traditional authority and the poisoned populism of social media-age politics. Final Acts of Violence: Symbolize collapse under social pressure and loss of moral compass. ⭐️ Ratings Michael: 4 out of 5 stars – “Bold, sharp, close to perfect…” Dave: 4 out of 5 stars – “Difficult but essential viewing… very funny, deeply human…” 🗣️ Start of Reviews ⏱️ Timestamp: 40:50 Michael opens the review section, defending the film’s boldness, satire, and visual style. Emphasizes how the film captures the chaos and performative energy of 2020. Strong praise for the thematic relevance and technical execution. Final rating: 4 out of 5 stars ⏱️ 46:31 – Dave’s Review Compares the emotional weight of Eddington to films like Civil War and No Country for Old Men. Praises the film for humanizing characters and confronting social disintegration. Final rating: 4 out of 5 stars Ends with a call for the film to be recognized as one of the most thought-provoking of the year. 🧠 Start of Thematic Discussion ⏱️ Timestamp: 50:34 “Let’s talk about the cacophony that is this film in our spoiler section…” 00:20 – Explores how Eddington portrays social media as a force of division, aligning with Ari Aster’s Wired interview. 01:11 – Aster’s quote about telling a coherent story from an incoherent miasma is discussed and praised. 02:15 – Dave references a protest scene and critiques performative activism in a majority-white town. 04:46 – Joe Cross as a stand-in for embodied social media, broadcasting manipulation via megaphone. 06:08 – Dave compares the film to Scorsese’s King of Comedy and Taxi Driver, especially in how antagonists are aggrandized. 07:26 – Michael analyzes characters like Sarah, pointing out value systems shaped entirely by online culture. 08:13 – Cross and the protesters mirror each other’s rhetoric but cannot communicate—highlighting echo chambers. 08:46–12:12 – The unhoused character is explored as a possible prophetic figure. The town ignores real suffering in favor of symbolic outrage. 12:25–14:11 – The sheriff’s arc from performative compassion to violence is unpacked. His choices reflect moral confusion and performative politics. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/37530090

Episode 97 - 28 Years Later 07/07/2025

Episode 96: The Phoenician Scheme 06/20/2025

Episode 95 - The Life of Chuck 06/14/2025

Episode 94: Friendship 05/31/2025

Episode 93: Mission Impossible: Final Reckoning 05/25/2025

Episode 93: Mission Impossible: Final Reckoning 🎙️ Mindframe(s) Podcast – Episode 93 Mission: Impossible: Final Reckoning (and Franchise Retrospective) 🎬 Film Details Title: Mission: Impossible – Final Reckoning Director: Christopher McQuarrie Writers: Christopher McQuarrie, Erik Jendresen Main Cast: Tom Cruise – Ethan Hunt Hayley Atwell – Grace Esai Morales – Gabriel Ving Rhames – Luther Stickell Simon Pegg – Benji Dunn Rebecca Ferguson – Ilsa Faust Pom Klementieff – Paris ⏱️ Timestamps & Highlights 00:15 – Intro Michael and Dave kick off with their usual charm, setting the tone for a franchise deep dive. 01:00 – Plot Recap Ethan Hunt faces off against “The Entity,” a rogue AI threatening global stability. 02:45 – McQuarrie & Cruise: The Power Duo Exploring their partnership from Rogue Nation to Final Reckoning. 04:00 – The Franchise Evolves Reflections on how the series matured post-MI:2, with J.J. Abrams, Brad Bird, and McQuarrie each leaving a mark. 06:30 – Cast Talk Revisiting the ensemble—Benji, Grace, Luther, Gabriel—and a few names we all struggle to remember. 08:00 – Film Reviews Michael: Solid entry but overdramatic. Dave: Incredible stunts, a bit scattered narratively. 13:10 – MI’s Long Legacy From its TV origins to blockbuster dominance—what keeps MI relevant? 17:00 – MI vs. Bond An argument for Hunt as the more ethical spy archetype. 23:00 – The Power of Practical Stunts Cruise’s death-defying feats as franchise identity. 26:00 – John Wick Comparison Fun detour comparing franchises—emotional vs. spectacle-driven action. 29:00 – Celebrating Cruise Behind-the-scenes appreciation for Tom Cruise’s intensity and kindness. 32:30 – Marketing the Stunt How each film builds its campaign around a singular Cruise stunt. 36:00 – Consistency Pays Off Why MI might be the most consistent franchise outside the superhero realm. 42:00 – What’s Next? Sneak peek at Friendship and Thunderbolts in upcoming episodes. 📬 Contact Us Now Playing Network: Got feedback or just want to geek out about movies with us? Reach out—we’d love to hear from you! /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/36705145

Episode 92: Sinners 05/02/2025

Episode 92: Sinners Absolutely! Here’s the same set of show notes with chapter timestamps added to guide listeners through the episode: 🎙️ Mindframes – Episode 92 “Sinners (2025): Vampires, Blues, and the Power of Community” In this episode, Michael and Dave dive deep into Sinners, the bold, original horror-drama from director Ryan Coogler. Featuring Michael B. Jordan in a dual role and a breakout performance by Miles Katon, Sinners blends genre thrills with potent social commentary, historical resonance, and musical mysticism. 🧛‍♂️ Topics We Cover: 00:00 – Intro & Background Welcome and overview of Sinners Ryan Coogler’s directorial track record The film’s box office buzz and unique 25-year rights deal 07:00 – Coogler’s Style and Themes Socially conscious storytelling across Coogler’s films How Sinners fits in with Creed and Black Panther 09:00 – Cinematography & IMAX Impact Shot in 65mm IMAX—what it adds to the experience Natural light, cloudy skies, and thematic lighting shifts The power of visual framing and mise-en-scène 20:00 – Editing & Dual Performance Magic How the film nails having Michael B. Jordan play twins Why the editing feels seamless and emotionally grounded 24:00 – Music, Blues, and the Soundtrack The blues as culture, history, and emotional truth How the score becomes a character in the film A musical that isn’t a musical—but could be 26:30 – Cast Performances Michael B. Jordan’s award-worthy dual role Miles Katon’s emotional breakout Hailee Steinfeld, Delroy Lindo, and standout supporting cast A Chicago-based cameo worth cheering for 34:00 – Spoiler-Free Final Thoughts Emotional resonance and thematic impact Horror, humor, heart, and history Why it’s one of 2025’s most complete films 44:00 – Spoiler Section Begins Vampires as a metaphor for cultural appropriation The meaning of “Pick Poor Robin Clean” The juke joint as sanctuary and symbol The unforgettable ancestral musical scene Thematic reflections on sin, soul, and survival 🎬 Film on IMDb: 🎧 Mindframes /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/36405575

Episode 89: Mickey 17 04/24/2025

Episode 89: Mickey 17 🎙️ Mindframes Episode 89: Mickey 17 "Clone Wars, Class Wars, and Saucy Politics in Space" In this episode, Dave Canfield and Michael Cockerill dive into Mickey 17, Bong Joon-ho’s long-anticipated follow-up to Parasite. Set on a frozen alien planet, this satirical sci-fi tale stars Robert Pattinson as Mickey Barnes, a worker cloned repeatedly for hazardous missions — until one version survives and meets his successor. 🎬 What We Cover: The Bong Joon-ho Cinematic Universe From Snowpiercer to Parasite to Barking Dogs Never Bite, how Bong’s signature blend of class critique, dark comedy, and genre-bending plays out in Mickey 17. Cinematography with Darius Khondji A breakdown of the film’s visual tone, comparisons to Snowpiercer, High Life, and why the images may not quite match Bong's past visual highs. Robert Pattinson's Multiverse of Performances Dave and Mike celebrate Pattinson’s career choices — from The Lighthouse to The Batman — and how he brings depth and humor to not one but two Mickeys. Satire, Teeth, and Mark Ruffalo as a Space Trump A closer look at the film’s political commentary, from Ruffalo’s MAGA-esque cult leader to Toni Collette’s obsession with sauces and the absurdity of elite culture. The Cloning Conundrum & Worker Exploitation Is Mickey 17 an empathy machine? The hosts explore themes of expendability, labor value, and late-stage capitalism through the lens of sci-fi cloning. Comparisons & Influences The episode draws parallels to Moon, Us, High Life, The Empire Strikes Back, and even American Psycho — all filtered through Bong’s singular vision. 🔥 Quick Takes: “Bong Joon-ho makes movies about people trapped in systems that don’t value them.” “Toni Collette’s sauce obsession might be the most disturbing metaphor in the film.” “It’s like High Life with a hint of hope.” 🧠 Bottom Line: This might not hit the same heights as Parasite or Snowpiercer, but it’s still sharp, visually compelling, and deeply Bong. The Mindframes hosts both rate it 4 out of 5 Mickeys — and recommend seeing it on the biggest screen you can. 💌 Join the conversation: Visit Or hit us up on 🎧 Part of the Now Playing Network /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/36228400

Episode 91 - Warfare 04/19/2025

Episode 91 - Warfare 🎙️ Mindframes Podcast – Episode 91: Warfare 🎧 Hosts: Michael Cockerill & Dave Canfield 🎬 Film: Warfare (2025), dir. Alex Garland & Ray Mendoza 📍 Location: Music Box Theatre, Chicago ⏱️ Timestamps & Segment Summaries: [00:00–01:30] — Intro & Film Overview Michael introduces the film Warfare, co-directed by Alex Garland (Ex Machina, Civil War) and Ray Mendoza, a real-life Navy SEAL. Set during the Iraq War in 2006, the film follows a SEAL team as a surveillance mission devolves into a real-time battle for survival. [01:30–03:30] — Garland + Mendoza Collaboration The hosts highlight Garland’s visual language from Civil War and Mendoza’s military experience. Mendoza previously worked as a military advisor and makes his co-directorial debut, grounding the action in authenticity. [03:30–05:30] — A New Kind of War Film Dave and Michael compare Warfare to cinema verité. It strips away backstory, plot arcs, and even music, placing viewers in the immediacy of war. The film’s realism makes it emotionally immersive rather than glorifying. [05:30–10:00] — Comparing Garland’s Themes The hosts reflect on Garland’s previous works (Annihilation, Men, Ex Machina) and how Warfare departs from his usual metaphysical themes. While earlier films centered on confronting unknowns, Warfare is grounded and experiential. [10:00–16:00] — Tone, Politics & Empathy Dave emphasizes Warfare’s non-political stance — it doesn't "pick sides" but immerses viewers in the soldiers’ experience. The film resists traditional “hoorah” war tropes, favoring a depiction of camaraderie, trauma, and ambiguity. [16:00–22:00] — Acting & Realism Will Poulter is praised for his understated and believable performance. The cast’s lack of exposition or melodrama enhances the film’s immersive feel. The SEALs aren’t framed as superheroes — they’re human, fallible, and professional under extreme duress. [22:00–30:00] — Real-Time Pacing & Directorial Choices The podcast explores how real-time pacing increases tension. There’s no music, no time skips, no omniscient viewpoint — just boots-on-the-ground survival. The set was a reconstructed Iraqi neighborhood, shot with handheld cameras and long takes to increase claustrophobia. [30:00–40:00] — Cinematography as Philosophy The camera mimics a fellow soldier, crouching behind walls and moving with the characters. Michael and Dave liken this to the immersive style of 1917, though even more stripped down. Observational themes emerge as the camera shifts from viewer to viewed. [40:00–47:00] — Production Design & Immersive Worldbuilding Details like era-appropriate gear, drone tech, and consistent physical space reinforce realism. Everything down to military language is authentic, thanks to Mendoza. This reinforces the film’s goal: not storytelling, but situational transference. [47:00–56:00] — Why It’s Anti-War Without Saying So Michael and Dave argue that the film's realism is its anti-war statement. There's no need for speeches or political commentary — the relentless brutality and human cost speak volumes. Dave compares this to 1960s anti-war films like The War Game and Overlord. [56:00–01:01:00] — Final Thoughts & Timelessness The film ends with ambiguity — no grand victory, just survival and confusion. Michael praises the restraint: “They leave. That’s the ending.” Dave notes how demythologizing war through realism creates a deeper, more honest emotional impact. 💬 Highlight Quotes: “It’s not about choosing sides. You just happen to be with the Americans.” – Dave “The movie doesn’t tell you what war is. It makes you feel what it’s like.” – Michael “Once you strip away the mythology, all that’s left is shellshock and dust.” – Dave 🎖️ Ratings: Dave: ★★★★☆ — “One of the best anti-war films since the ‘70s.” Michael: ★★★★☆ — “Raw, claustrophobic, and unforgettable.” 📽️ Films Referenced: Civil War Annihilation Ex Machina Men 1917 Black Hawk Down Dunkirk Apocalypse Now The War Game Overlord 🧛 Next Episode Tease: 🎬 Sinners — Michael B. Jordan’s vampire-demon hybrid film might be next on the docket. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/36228425

Episode 90 - Death of a Unicorn 03/28/2025

Episode 90 - Death of a Unicorn Sure! Based on the transcript from Mindframes Episode 90 – "Death of a Unicorn", here are listener-friendly notes: Episode 90: Death of a Unicorn A Mindframes Film Conversation Guests: 🎙️ (Chicago film critic) 🎬 Basic Info Film: Death of a Unicorn Director: Alex Scharfman (Directorial debut) Genre: Black comedy with horror elements Cast Highlights: Paul Rudd as Elliot Jenna Ortega as Ridley Richard E. Grant as Odell Will Poulter as Shepard Téa Leoni as Odell's wife Anthony Carrigan as Griff Jessica Hynes as Shaw Premiere: South by Southwest (SXSW) Wide Release: This weekend (as of episode release) 🎭 Key Themes Satire of the ultra-wealthy Performative altruism Corporate greed (nods to pharma industry) Unicorns as metaphors — not for children! Mashup of genre: horror + black comedy Comparisons to Companion, Triangle of Sadness, and Black Sheep ⏱️ Timestamps & Highlights Timestamp Topic 00:00 Episode intro + guest Tarek Fayoumi joins 00:50 Overview of Death of a Unicorn & director Alex Scharfman 02:50 Early reactions and quirky tone of the film 05:30 Non-spoiler plot summary – unicorns, gore, and satire 06:57 Expanded plot: Paul Rudd’s character hits a unicorn en route to a CEO’s wilderness estate 08:00 Gore, vengeance, and absurdist turns 09:00 Neil deGrasse Tyson jokes and tonal weirdness 09:20 Cast discussion begins – Paul Rudd staying in his comedic “box” 11:00 Jenna Ortega’s horror film streak & flexibility as an actress 13:00 Will Poulter as a “punchable privileged” character with great comic timing 19:00 Téa Leoni praised for subtlety and satire – comparisons to Toni Collette 21:00 Recognition of supporting cast: Anthony Carrigan, Jessica Hynes, and Katherine Erbe 26:00 Commentary on satire and class critique 27:00 Cinematography discussion – possible nature doc inspiration 28:30 Importance of unicorn visuals – practical + CGI blend 32:00 Film was shot in Slovenia, animation outsourced – budget-conscious production 36:00 Cost-saving decisions and strategic casting choices 38:00 Discussion on shifting movie release windows and streaming vs theatrical landscape 39:30 Joke about popcorn buckets and box office trends 42:00 Reviews begin – Mike praises the genre blend and Will Poulter's performance 43:30 Dave praises the gore, creature effects, and genre fusion 46:00 Final verdict: 3 out of 4 unicorn horns from both hosts 47:00 Not for kids – don’t let the unicorns fool you! 48:00 Movie lacks a love story – passes a rare “MacDell test” Let me know if you’d like this formatted for a website or podcast show notes page — I can do that too! /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/35818250

Episode 88 - The Monkey 03/12/2025

Episode 88 - The Monkey Mindframes – Episode 88: The Monkey (2025) 🎙️ A sometimes half-assed but always wholehearted film conversation. 🔹 Hosts: Michael Cockerill & Dave Canfield 🔹 Episode Runtime: Approx. 56 minutes 🔹 Film Discussed: The Monkey (2025) 🔹 Directed by: Osgood Perkins 🔹 Based on: The Monkey (1980), a short story by Stephen King (Skeleton Crew) 🎬 General Information – The Monkey (2025) 🔻 Director: Osgood "Oz" Perkins (The Blackcoat’s Daughter, Longlegs, Gretel & Hansel) 🔻 Screenplay: Osgood Perkins 🔻 Based on: The Monkey by Stephen King 🔻 Cinematography: Nico Aguilar (Longlegs) 🔻 Special Effects Coordinator: Greg Pine (Final Destination-style death scenes!) ⭐ Cast Highlights Theo James (Divergent) – Hal & Bill (Twin Brothers, Dual Role) Christian Convery (Sweet Tooth) – Young Hal & Bill Elijah Wood (The Lord of the Rings) – Hammerman, a self-help parenting guru Tatiana Maslany (Orphan Black, She-Hulk) – Aunt Lois Adam Scott (Severance, Parks & Rec) – Cameo as the Monkey’s former owner Colin O’Brien (Wonka) – Petey Rowan Campbell (The Hardy Boys) – Ricky 🛠️ Special Trivia The toy monkey plays a drum, not cymbals, due to a legal conflict with Disney (Toy Story 3 featured a cymbal-playing monkey). Limited edition popcorn bucket featuring the monkey was a sought-after collectible. You can buy an official Monkey figurine for $125 at Neon’s store. 📌 Episode Breakdown & Timestamps [00:00] – Introduction Michael and Dave introduce the episode and film under discussion. [00:35] – What is The Monkey? Background on the film’s origin from Stephen King’s short story. Overview of Osgood Perkins’ horror film career. [01:39] – Osgood Perkins as a Director Dave shares his past interview with Perkins and how his films explore grief & trauma. Perkins' stylistic shift from atmospheric horror to dark comedy. [02:52] – How Different is This from Stephen King's Story? King’s original story = pure dread. This adaptation = comedic, absurd, yet still horror-infused. [04:10] – Trivia: Why Doesn’t the Monkey Have Cymbals? The monkey was originally designed with cymbals. Disney’s legal team intervened (due to a character in Toy Story 3). A drum was used instead—and now it's iconic. [05:58] – Cast & Performances Breakdown of the cast’s performances. Theo James’ dual role as Hal & Bill—a highlight of the film. Elijah Wood's role as a self-help guru satirizing modern parenting culture. Tatiana Maslany’s role & why she stands out. [09:47] – The Monkey's Death Scenes & Cinematography The over-the-top death scenes add to the Final Destination-style fun. Cinematography by Nico Aguilar (Longlegs) helps create aesthetic horror-comedy. [15:48] – Special Effects & The Role of Blood Mix of practical effects and CGI. Hosts critique CGI blood overuse but praise the practical effects. [18:46] – What is The Monkey Really About? The film explores generational trauma. Horror trend: Fathers passing down hidden burdens (Hereditary, The Wolfman). The monkey symbolizes trauma that can’t be ignored. [20:28] – How the Movie Handles Generational Trauma Hal tries to escape it—but the monkey keeps coming back. Final message: You can’t erase trauma, only learn to live with it. [27:31] – The Film’s Ending (Spoilers) The monkey is not destroyed—Hal and Petey drive away with it. The Horseman of Death cameo—what does it mean? School bus cheerleader decapitation scene: Meta-commentary on horror audiences? [39:55] – The Mystery of Ricky (Fan Theory) Could Ricky be Bill’s secret son? Shared trauma & absentee fathers play a major role. Closet uniform mystery—not everything adds up. [42:44] – Final Thoughts & Reviews Michael: Fun film, but not scary. Dave: Perkins proves his range beyond horror. Both agree: Worth watching, especially for horror-comedy fans. [48:08] – What Would You Do If You Had The Monkey? The monkey does NOT take requests—it kills on its own terms. [55:01] – Closing & Next Episode Next episode: Bong Joon-ho’s Mickey 17 starring Robert Pattinson. Listener engagement: Is The Monkey horror or comedy? What do you think of its take on generational trauma? Could there be a Monkey 2? 📲 Join the discussion: 💬 Email Michael & Dave: /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/35663480

Episode 87: Companion 02/19/2025

Episode 87: Companion Episode Summary In this episode, Dave and Michael discuss Companion, the directorial debut from Drew Hancock. A mix of science fiction, dark comedy, and thriller, Companion follows Iris, a robot companion, as she navigates power dynamics and hidden agendas during a weekend getaway at a remote lakeside estate. The film explores themes of toxic relationships, control, and AI consciousness, all while delivering sharp humor and unexpected twists. Director: Drew Hancock Genre: Sci-Fi, Dark Comedy, Thriller Produced by: Barbarian creative team (Zach Cregger, Roy Lee, J.D. Lipschitz, Raphael Margolis) Cast: Sophie Thatcher (Yellowjackets, Heretic) as Iris Jack Quaid (The Boys) as Josh Lucas Gage (Euphoria, The White Lotus) as Patrick Megan Suri (It Lives Inside, Never Have I Ever) as Kat Harvey Guillén (What We Do in the Shadows) as Eli Rupert Friend (The Death of Stalin, Homeland) as Sergei Timestamps & Discussion Highlights 00:00:15 - Introduction Dave welcomes listeners to Mindframes and introduces the show’s format. Michael reveals the movie they’re discussing: Companion (2024). 00:00:35 - Movie Overview Companion is the directorial debut of Drew Hancock. A science fiction, dark comedy, and thriller with "stabby stab" moments but not a full horror film. The plot follows Iris, a robot companion, as she joins her human partner, Josh, for a weekend getaway that quickly turns into chaos. 00:02:06 - The Barbarian Connection Produced by Zach Cregger (Barbarian), along with Roy Lee, J.D. Lipschitz, and Raphael Margolis. Cregger was originally set to direct but handed the project to Hancock. Shares some tonal shifts and unexpected turns similar to Barbarian. 00:03:59 - A Surprisingly Funny Movie Marketed as horror, but the film has strong comedic elements. Michael stopped watching the trailer halfway because it reveals too much. Despite its darker themes, the humor is well-placed and helps with pacing. 00:04:26 - The Cast & Performances Sophie Thatcher (Yellowjackets, Heretic) as Iris – A standout performance. Jack Quaid (The Boys) as Josh – A departure from his usual roles, making him unrecognizable compared to his character Huey in The Boys. Lucas Gage (Euphoria, The White Lotus) as Patrick – Cast as the “pretty guy.” Megan Suri (It Lives Inside, Never Have I Ever) as Kat – A complex role. Harvey Guillén (What We Do in the Shadows) as Eli – Comedic powerhouse, but hard not to see him as Guillermo. Rupert Friend (The Death of Stalin, Homeland) as Sergei – A mix of comedic and sinister. 00:12:51 - Cinematography, Editing & Directing Eli Bourne handles cinematography, giving the film an intimate, isolated feel. Michael praises the film’s pacing and editing, crediting Josh Ether for helping keep the story sharp. The location scouting is excellent, contributing to the film’s eerie atmosphere. 00:13:15 - The “Eat the Rich” Subgenre Comparison Companion shares *similarities with films like The Menu and Triangle of Sadness. Though not a direct critique of wealth, the film hints at class and power dynamics. 00:14:00 - January as a “Dumping Ground” for Movies Companion was released in early 2024, a time studios often use to release movies they’re unsure how to market. Despite this, the film is better than most January releases and deserves more recognition. Themes & Analysis 00:28:05 - Toxic Relationships & Power Imbalances Core theme: How control, manipulation, and exploitation manifest in relationships—both human and AI. Companion raises questions about agency and autonomy, especially in imbalanced relationships. 00:29:25 - Gender & Objectification Iris represents the struggles of real-world women who fight for autonomy in male-dominated spaces. Historically, women were seen as property—a dynamic mirrored in Iris’s role as a “companion.” 00:30:51 - The Film’s Unique Take on AI Representation Unlike many AI films that focus on “Pinocchio syndrome” (wanting to be real), Companion focuses on how people treat objects that can think and feel. Dave argues that the film doesn’t necessarily “humanize” Iris, but Michael strongly disagrees, saying she’s treated as an individual from the start. 00:37:12 - The Relationship Between Josh & Iris A perfect example of a toxic relationship. Josh gaslights and controls Iris, using his “love” as a justification for ownership. Parallels to real-life relationships where one partner holds all the power. 00:39:38 - Eli & Patrick: Love or Control? Eli & Patrick’s relationship is framed as genuine, but Eli literally has a kill switch for Patrick. Raises the question: Can there ever be real love when there’s an extreme power imbalance? 00:45:12 - Kat: A Different Kind of User Kat manipulates Sergei for money, just as Josh uses Iris for companionship. Unlike Josh, Kat is honest about her self-serving nature—making her an interesting contrast. Her conversation with Iris about feeling “disposable” adds emotional depth to her character. 00:48:43 - Josh’s Downfall & The Role of Technology Josh’s death by an automatic corkscrew is a symbol of his reliance on technology and the loss of control he thought he had. Technology and control are central themes—whether AI, smart devices, or old-school CD players. Verdict & Ratings 01:14:40 - Final Thoughts & Scores Dave: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) - “One of the best AI movies in recent years.” Michael: ⭐⭐⭐½ - ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (3.5 - 4/5) - “Great performances, strong pacing, and an excellent directorial debut.” 01:20:00 - Why You Should See Companion Companion is in limited theatrical release, so see it before it’s gone! Despite marketing challenges, it’s one of the best films of early 2024. Closing Notes & Where to Watch Companion is currently in wide release but may leave theaters soon. Mindframes encourages listeners to share their thoughts via email. 📢 What did you think of Companion? Let us know! 📧 Email us with your thoughts! /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/35343335

Episode 86: Presence 02/04/2025

Episode 86: Presence Mindframes: The Presence – A Steven Soderbergh Experiment Episode Summary: In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave are joined by special guest Tarek Fayoumi (MoviesWithTarek.com, Chicago Indie Critics) to dissect Steven Soderbergh's new film, The Presence. They explore its unique point-of-view cinematography, thematic connections to isolation in modern horror, and its place within Soderbergh's diverse filmography. The trio also debates the film’s strengths, weaknesses, and whether it truly earns its ghost story label. 🔖 Topics & Timestamps: ⏳ 00:00:14 – Welcome & Introductions Michael & Dave introduce the show and their guest, Tarek Fayoumi. Tarek shares insights from his work as a film critic. ⏳ 00:01:57 – Overview of The Presence Introduction to The Presence, a ghost story with a unique POV perspective. Soderbergh's cinematography choices and how they affect immersion. ⏳ 00:03:06 – Tarek’s Experience with Soderbergh How Soderbergh creates realism in his films. Discussion of his past work, including Contagion and the Ocean’s films. ⏳ 00:04:51 – What Makes The Presence Unique? The film’s VR-like cinematography and immersive ghostly POV. How the film builds tension without traditional horror tropes. ⏳ 00:05:22 – Ghost Story Influences Comparing The Presence to films like The Others, The Sixth Sense, and The Haunting. How it differs from found footage and traditional ghost stories. ⏳ 00:08:00 – David Koepp’s Writing & The Ending Debate Discussion of screenwriter David Koepp’s contributions (Jurassic Park, Stir of Echoes). Does the film’s ending work? Michael & Dave share mixed feelings. ⏳ 00:15:28 – Soderbergh’s Diverse Career: Any Common Threads? Oceans 11, Erin Brockovich, Solaris, and Sex, Lies, and Videotape – what connects them? Soderbergh’s recurring themes of surveillance, observation, and isolation. ⏳ 00:22:54 – Official Synopsis & Final Thoughts A family moves into a suburban home and suspects they are not alone… The Presence as an atmospheric rather than traditional horror. ⏳ 00:24:43 – Reviews & Star Ratings Dave: Compelling but imperfect; worth rewatching. Michael: A solid 3/5 stars – eerie but flawed. Tarek: 3/4 stars – an experimental approach that mostly works. ⏳ 00:30:23 – Spoiler Discussion: What is The Presence Really About? The film’s twist ending and character revelations. Comparing the film’s isolation themes to The Babadook, Hereditary, and Smile. ⏳ 00:41:50 – Isolation in Horror Films (Post-2010) The rise of horror exploring loneliness, grief, and societal detachment. Films like Midsommar, Talk to Me, Alone With You, and I Saw the TV Glow. ⏳ 00:52:04 – Final Thoughts on the Family Dynamics Lucy Liu as the mom – how does she fit into this role? The dad as a "perfect but helpless" figure. 🔗 Follow Us: 🌐 🌐 🎥 Guest: Tarek Fayoumi – /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/35107310

Episode 85: The Best of 2024 01/28/2025

Episode 85: The Best of 2024 In this episode of MindFrames, Dave and Michael break down the best films of 2024. With themes ranging from authoritarianism and resilience to identity and connection, the hosts discuss how these movies reflect and challenge the cultural zeitgeist. They also dive into the year’s standout horror films and share their thoughts on the Oscars' major contenders. Timestamps and Topics [00:00:16] Welcome and Introduction Dave and Michael set the tone for the episode, outlining their approach to discussing the best films of 2024. [00:01:18] Reflecting on the Year in Film The hosts share general thoughts on 2024 in cinema—was it a year of classics or just solid hits? [00:02:09] Horror Highlights of 2024 Dave and Michael praise the exceptional year for horror, with standout titles like The Substance, Nosferatu, and Cuckoo. [00:03:22] Oscar Campaigns and Predictions A lively discussion about the politics of Oscar campaigns, including surprises, snubs, and predictions. [00:04:49] Themes of 2024 in Film Michael discusses the criteria that shaped his top 10 list, emphasizing themes like despair, resilience, and power dynamics. [00:06:44] Top 10 Films: Starting with Nickel Boys Michael explains why Nickel Boys made his list, focusing on its themes and performances, while Dave critiques its filmmaking style. [00:09:16] Dave’s Horror List and Honorable Mentions Dave shares his top horror films of 2024, including Alien: Romulus and Handling the Undead. [00:15:11] A Complete Unknown: A Deep Dive Michael highlights Timothy Chalamet’s performance as Bob Dylan in this period drama, reflecting on its relevance to today. [00:28:09] Thematic Standouts: The Substance vs. Nosferatu A comparison of two horror standouts, with Michael favoring The Substance for its timely relevance and Dave praising Nosferatu’s timelessness. [00:50:20] International Gems: The Seed of the Sacred Fig Michael explores the Iranian allegory for authoritarianism and resilience, reflecting on its layered storytelling. [01:00:06] Animated Masterpiece: Flow Dave describes this visually stunning Latvian animated film, tying it to themes of community, refugees, and environmental decline. [01:03:28] Sean Baker’s Anora: A Human Story The hosts celebrate Anora as a funny, heartfelt, and raw depiction of resilience and humanity, with standout performances and themes. [01:08:07] Closing Thoughts and Listener Recommendations Dave and Michael reflect on how the year’s films resonate with ongoing cultural conversations and share what’s next for MindFrames. Dave's non-ordered list(s) A Different Man Seed of the Sacred Fig All We Imagine As Light Civil War Red Rooms The Substance Wicked Flow A Real Pain Sing Sing HONORABLE MENTIONS The Girl with the Needle The Room Next Door Anora Conclave September 5 Hard Truths Michael's list Sing Sing Conclave Anora The Seed of the Sacred Fig The Brutalist The Substance Nosferatu A Real Pain Wicked A Complete Unknown Nickel Boys Mentioned Films Where to Find Us www.mindframesfilm.com /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/35042145

Episode 84: Nosferatu 01/14/2025

Episode 84: Nosferatu Mindframes Episode: Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu Summary: In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave explore Robert Eggers' reimagining of the classic silent film Nosferatu. They discuss Eggers’ meticulous approach to filmmaking, the legacy of Nosferatu, and the cultural evolution of vampires in cinema. The conversation touches on German Expressionist cinematography, standout performances, and the thematic depth of the film. They also reflect on how vampires mirror societal fears across decades, from early depictions of monstrous villains to modern sympathetic portrayals. Timestamps: 00:00 – Introduction Overview of the podcast and today’s topic: Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu. Michael and Dave reflect on their history with Eggers’ films. 05:30 – The Legacy of Nosferatu A look back at the 1922 silent film and its influence on cinema. Discussion of previous adaptations, including Werner Herzog’s 1979 version. 12:00 – Eggers’ Filmmaking Style Comparison to Ridley Scott’s attention to detail and world-building. How Eggers adapts myths in The Northman, The Witch, and Nosferatu. 17:45 – Spoiler-Free Review Praise for the German Expressionist-inspired cinematography. Discussion of Lily-Rose Depp’s performance and Count Orlok’s menacing presence. The thought-provoking and ambiguous ending. 25:00 – Vampires in Cinema: A Cultural Lens How vampires have evolved from monstrous threats to sympathetic figures. Examples from Dracula (1931), Dark Shadows (1966), and Interview with the Vampire (1994). The resurgence of evil, monstrous vampires in recent films like Let the Right One In and The Last Voyage of the Demeter. 38:30 – Thematic Analysis of Nosferatu Count Orlok as a symbol of predation and isolation. Ellen’s mystical connection to Orlok and her ultimate sacrifice. Reflections on societal fears of disease, isolation, and evil. 50:00 – Final Thoughts and Recommendations How Eggers’ Nosferatu compares to his earlier films. Other films mentioned: The Lighthouse, The Witch, Herzog’s Nosferatu, and Let the Right One In. Upcoming episodes teased: Best of 2024, The Wolfman, and animation coverage. Where to Find Us: Website: Facebook: Podcast Network: Next Episode: Best Films of 2024 (tentative) /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/34819680

Episode 83: Heretic 12/11/2024

Episode 83: Heretic Podcast Episode Description: In this episode of Mindframes, Michael Cockerill and Dave Canfield dive into the chilling world of Heretic, the latest horror film by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods (A Quiet Place). We explore the film's themes of faith, control, and belief, contrasting its intellectual horror with its visceral thrills. Join us as we analyze Hugh Grant's standout performance as the sinister Mr. Reed, the dynamic interplay between the two Mormon missionaries, Sister Barnes and Sister Paxton, and the movie's ambiguous exploration of spirituality and skepticism. Whether you're intrigued by the film's intricate set design, its dialogue-driven narrative, or its controversial take on religious and philosophical themes, this episode is for you. We also share insights on how Heretic fits into the broader landscape of 2024's standout horror films, with comparisons to Hereditary, Get Out, and The Exorcist. Tune in to hear our recommendations and join the conversation about one of the year's most thought-provoking horror films. Podcast Summary with Timestamps 0:00 – 1:00 – Intro Michael and Dave introduce the episode, setting the stage for a deep dive into Heretic by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods. They touch on the directors’ previous works (A Quiet Place, Haunt) and their distinct horror style. 1:01 – 5:30 – Overview of Heretic A brief plot summary: Two Mormon missionaries, Sister Barnes (Sophie Thatcher) and Sister Paxton (Chloe East), find themselves trapped by Mr. Reed (Hugh Grant), whose philosophical and theological challenges evolve into a fight for survival. 5:31 – 12:00 – Themes of Faith and Control The hosts explore the film’s central themes, including the idea of religion as a mechanism of control versus a source of hope. Mr. Reed’s character embodies skepticism, while the missionaries represent differing interpretations of belief. 12:01 – 18:30 – Performances and Character Dynamics Hugh Grant’s portrayal of Mr. Reed is highlighted as a standout performance. The hosts delve into the dynamic between the sisters, contrasting Sister Barnes’ depth of faith with Sister Paxton’s cultural adherence. 18:31 – 24:00 – Set Design and Technical Elements A discussion on the film’s claustrophobic set design, the use of close-ups, and the intricate dollhouse motif that symbolizes control and manipulation. 24:01 – 30:00 – Comparisons to Other Films Connections are drawn to Hereditary, Get Out, and The Exorcist. The hosts note Heretic’s unique blend of intellectual and visceral horror and its place within 2024’s strong lineup of religious-themed horror films. 30:01 – 35:00 – Spoiler Section: Plot Twists and Ending A dive into the film’s third act and its ambiguous ending. The hosts debate whether the film effectively balances its critique of faith and religion with its horror elements. 35:01 – 40:00 – Final Thoughts and Recommendations Michael and Dave share their final impressions, recommending Heretic for its bold themes and strong performances. They reflect on how the film leaves viewers questioning belief, control, and the power of faith. 40:01 – End – Outro The hosts close the episode, previewing a potential future discussion on Conclave, another film tackling themes of faith and religion. They invite listeners to connect with Mindframes online and thank them for tuning in. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/34391145

Episode 82: The Substance 10/30/2024

Episode 82: The Substance Episode 82 on The Substance Summary In this episode, Michael and Dave dive into The Substance, a film by Coralie Fargeat. The film explores the dark and gritty side of Hollywood’s obsession with youth, following Elizabeth Sparkle (Demi Moore), a former aerobic star who turns to a mysterious serum for a youthful transformation. This risky choice leads her into a twisted psychological battle with her younger self, Sue (Margaret Qualley), as the two are forced to switch bodies every seven days. Key Discussion Points Plot Overview: The film's exploration of ageism, Hollywood’s beauty standards, and the battle between youthful ambition and the wisdom of age. Director’s Style: Coral Le Far’s cinematic techniques, reminiscent of her previous work in Revenge, and visual callbacks to classic horror films like The Shining and The Fly. Cinematography and Sound Design: Praise for cinematographer Benjamin Krakun and sound designer Emmanuel's Yard, creating a contrast between Hollywood’s bright artificiality and the film’s dark themes. Practical Effects: Emphasis on the effective use of prosthetics and 1980s-inspired effects over CGI, with comparisons to movies like The Thing and Requiem for a Dream. Memorable Moments Shrimp Scene: The “disgusting” and metaphorical close-up of Dennis Quaid’s character devouring shrimp, symbolizing Hollywood’s consumption of aging stars. Body Horror: Discussions on the intense practical effects, leading to some wince-inducing moments that play with medical horror aesthetics. Themes of Identity and Self-Worth: The hosts analyze how the film examines the lengths people go to in order to stay relevant and young, questioning the true “value” of beauty and fame. Ratings and Final Thoughts Michael gives the film four stars, highlighting its timely commentary on youth obsession, while Dave awards it five stars, calling it one of the best films of the year. Both agree on the standout performances by Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley, predicting Oscar buzz. Cultural Commentary The hosts reflect on Hollywood's commodification of beauty and youth, pointing out how the film exposes the industry’s relentless pursuit of “perfection” and the unrealistic standards imposed on women. Looking Forward Next episode, Michael and Dave consider reviewing Heretic, an A24 horror film, or exploring other films relevant to award season buzz. Connect with Us Visit our website or find us on Facebook at MindframesMovies for more insights, and feel free to reach out if you’d like to be a guest or suggest a movie! Introduction to The Substance 00:00:15 - Michael welcomes listeners and introduces the movie The Substance. Plot Summary & Themes 00:00:42 - Dave gives a brief overview of the film’s plot, focusing on Elizabeth Sparkle’s battle with her younger self, Sue. 00:02:17 - Michael and Dave discuss the film’s themes of ageism, youth obsession, and identity in Hollywood. Director and Cinematography 00:03:01 - Discussion of Coral Le Far’s style, including her previous work on Revenge and the “revenge movie” genre. 00:04:09 - Michael describes the vibrant color palette and camera work, including hallway shots reminiscent of The Shining. Shrimp Scene & Sound Design 00:05:34 - Michael and Dave analyze the infamous “shrimp scene” with Dennis Quaid’s character, highlighting the film’s sound design. 00:07:06 - Praise for Emmanuel’s Yard’s work on the sound effects, enhancing the visceral experience. Practical Effects and Body Horror 00:09:07 - Dave discusses the impressive practical effects, comparing them to The Thing and emphasizing the grotesque elements that made even seasoned horror fans look away. Discussion on Hollywood and Beauty Standards 00:13:38 - Michael and Dave explore the film’s commentary on Hollywood’s treatment of aging women and the pressures of beauty standards. Performances by Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley 00:14:22 - The hosts delve into the powerful performances, especially Demi Moore’s nuanced portrayal of Elizabeth, and Margaret Qualley’s rising-star status. Film References & Influences 00:50:38 - The hosts compare The Substance to other films like The Elephant Man, Frankenstein, The Fly, and Carrie, discussing how these influences shape the film’s narrative and aesthetic. Ratings and Spoiler-Free Reviews 00:17:09 - Michael and Dave each give their spoiler-free ratings, with Michael awarding four stars and Dave giving it five. Third-Act Discussion & Moral Takeaways 00:46:18 - Spoiler discussion on the third act, where the hosts interpret the film’s moral stance on aging, beauty, and acceptance. Closing and Next Episode Preview 00:57:04 - Dave previews potential films for the next episode, including Heretic, an A24 horror movie, as well as Rumors, a film featuring Tilda Swinton. /episode/index/show/mindframes/id/33678827

Mindframe(s)

TOPICS