12 - Addendum - Missing Pieces
FRAMED: An Investigative Story
In season two of Framed, we attempted to piece together exactly what happened in the Buddhist Temple Massacre at Wat Promkunaram. The end result of our research efforts produced, what we hope, is the clearest picture of what happened to the nine victims of Arizona’s deadliest mass shooting. In spite of our efforts, there were still a few questions we were unable to answer in Season 2. So, the Framed Team kept digging, looking for those missing puzzle pieces. And, what we found has the potential to change
info_outline
11 - Where There’s Smoke – Part 2
FRAMED: An Investigative Story
To the question, what exactly happened inside the Wat Promkunaram temple on a warm summer night in 1991… we have an answer, and we think we can prove it.
info_outline
10 - Where There’s Smoke – Part 1
FRAMED: An Investigative Story
To the question, what exactly happened inside the Wat Promkunaram temple on a warm summer night in 1991… we have an answer, and we think we can prove it.
info_outline
9 - Veredictum
FRAMED: An Investigative Story
In this case, the evidence the jury used to reach their verdict was remarkably different than the evidence we’ve covered so far. On this episode of Framed, we’re going to explore why.
info_outline
8 - Snitches
FRAMED: An Investigative Story
This episode covers some of the more relevant snitches.
info_outline
7 - House on the Hill
FRAMED: An Investigative Story
On this episode of Framed, we’re going to focus on our material fact witnesses.
info_outline
6 - After Midnight
FRAMED: An Investigative Story
Looking at “persons-of-interest.”
info_outline
5 - No Witnesses
FRAMED: An Investigative Story
"It's time to give it up. I want you to start telling me what happened on August 9th, what your involvement was, and who all was there at the Temple. Let's just get this out and get it over with."
info_outline
4 - JD
FRAMED: An Investigative Story
A new suspect enters the interrogation room.
info_outline
3 - Marlin
FRAMED: An Investigative Story
The murder weapon is identified.
info_outlineThe rules that govern what evidence is admissible and what is inadmissible can be complicated. Often times our common sense understanding of what a relevant fact is doesn’t line up with what the law allows jurors to hear. The gap between the two views can be vast. In this case, the evidence the jury used to reach their verdict was remarkably different than the evidence we’ve covered so far. On this episode of Framed, we’re going to explore why.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.