loader from loading.io

518 - Legalized Theft

The Constitution Study podcast

Release Date: 04/13/2026

521 - Freedom's Extinction show art 521 - Freedom's Extinction

The Constitution Study podcast

Ronald Reagan once said that “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.” Is this the generation when that finally happens? You may think I'm being hyperbolic, but I think the evidence supports the possibility that this is true.

info_outline
520 - Birthright Citizenship at Oral Arguments show art 520 - Birthright Citizenship at Oral Arguments

The Constitution Study podcast

Does anyone who is born on our land automatically receive citizenship? Not according to the Fourteenth Amendment, but that hasn’t stopped the courts from messing this up. Which is exactly what I expect from the Supreme Court in the case Trump v. Barbara.

info_outline
519 - Defining Election Day show art 519 - Defining Election Day

The Constitution Study podcast

Congress gets to set Election Day, at least for federal offices. But is Election Day defined as the day the votes are cast, or the day they are counted? That is the question in the case Watson v. RNC.

info_outline
518 - Legalized Theft show art 518 - Legalized Theft

The Constitution Study podcast

You’ve probably heard of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. But does the Constitution allow a county to take and sell someones land to make a profit? That is the main question in the case Pung v Isabella County.

info_outline
517 - Parent's Rights in California show art 517 - Parent's Rights in California

The Constitution Study podcast

California has been violating parent’s rights for years. While a recent Supreme Court case has been hailed as a win for the good guys, it is just a small step restoring the role of parents in the lives of their children.

info_outline
516 - Suing the US Postal Service show art 516 - Suing the US Postal Service

The Constitution Study podcast

Lebene Konan sued the Euless, Texas post office for what she claimed were there intentional failure to deliver mail to rental property she owned. The Supreme Court just said she didn’t have the right to sue.

info_outline
515 - Ending the Federal Vaccine Shield Law show art 515 - Ending the Federal Vaccine Shield Law

The Constitution Study podcast

In 1988, Congress passed the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The logic behind this law was the belief that vaccines were so important to public health that holding vaccine manufacturers accountable for any injuries caused by the products was not possible. To end this unconstitutional law, Rand Paul has introduced Senate Bill 3853, the End the Vaccine Carveout Act.

info_outline
514 - Lifetime Gun Bans are Unconstitutional show art 514 - Lifetime Gun Bans are Unconstitutional

The Constitution Study podcast

For decades, otherwise lawful gun owners have been denied their rights under the Second Amendment due to a federal law. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals just decided a case claiming that law unconstitutional as applied to a Mr. Hembree.

info_outline
513 - Trump's Tariffs Go Down at SCOTUS show art 513 - Trump's Tariffs Go Down at SCOTUS

The Constitution Study podcast

After only approximately three and a half months, the Supreme Court issued their opinion in the Trump Tariff case. The speed, and the fact that opinion was released so early in the court’s term, should indicate both how urgent the case was, and how impactful.

info_outline
512 - Free Speech Reprieve in Hawaii show art 512 - Free Speech Reprieve in Hawaii

The Constitution Study podcast

The Hawaiian legislature passed Act 191 in an attempt to prohibit “materially deceptive media” that would harm the “reputation or electoral prospects of a candidate in an election”. This seems like an infringement on free speech. Thankfully the District Court for the District of Hawaii agreed.

info_outline
 
More Episodes
You’ve probably heard of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. But does the Constitution allow a county to take and sell someones land to make a profit? That is the main question in the case Pung v Isabella County.