NYC DCWP at the Forefront of Consumer Protection: A Conversation with Commissioner Sam Levine
Release Date: 04/23/2026
Consumer Finance Monitor
Artificial intelligence is increasingly changing single‑plaintiff consumer litigation, particularly by enabling pro se plaintiffs to file longer, more citation‑dense complaints more quickly, while simultaneously giving defense counsel tools to assess cases, identify weaknesses, and pursue early resolution or dismissal strategies. In the first episode of this series focusing on consumer financial services litigation, Joseph Schuster and Matthew Morr, partners at Ballard Spahr in our Consumer Financial Services Group, discuss both the tactical opportunities and the professional...
info_outlineConsumer Finance Monitor
In the episode of the Consumer Finance Monitor podcast released today, the host of the show, Alan Kaplinsky (founder, former leader for 25 years, and now Senior Counsel of our Consumer Financial Services Group) spoke with James Fallows Tierney, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Associate Professor of Law at Chicago-Kent College of Law, about his working paper, “.” Professor Tierney’s research focuses on the intersection of law, financial markets and consumer finance. His study uses financial-market data to examine how investors reacted to developments affecting the...
info_outlineConsumer Finance Monitor
The SpaceX IPO generated enormous attention for obvious reasons. It was the largest IPO in history, and the company’s stock price initially surged after trading began. But an important legal development associated with the IPO has received considerably less attention: SpaceX adopted an unusually comprehensive shareholder dispute-resolution regime (the “Regime”) in its bylaws. In our Consumer Finance Monitor podcast released today, our host, Alan Kaplinsky (founder, former leader for 25 years, and now Senior Counsel of our Consumer Financial Services Group) spoke with Professor Mohsen...
info_outlineConsumer Finance Monitor
In our Consumer Finance Monitor podcast show being released today, our special guest John McNamara, Chief Growth Officer at Avtal (a fintech and software as a service (SAS) company that provides an AI-powered, white-labeled digital engagement platform to help third-party consumer debt collection agencies automate communication and process self-service payments) and a former CFPB senior official who played a significant role in developing Regulation F promulgated under the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act explained that the debt collection industry needs to distinguish genuine AI...
info_outlineConsumer Finance Monitor
In the Consumer Finance Monitor podcast we are releasing today, Alan Kaplinsky, founder and former chair for 25 years and now Senior Counsel of the Consumer Financial Services Group, spoke with Professor Mark Bartholomew of the University at Buffalo School of Law, co-author with Professor Samuel Becher of “,” a forthcoming article in the William & Mary Law Review. The article explores how autonomous shopping agents could transform consumer commerce and raises fundamental questions concerning consumer autonomy, privacy, competition and consumer protection. The implications for financial...
info_outlineConsumer Finance Monitor
The future of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) has rarely been more uncertain. Since its creation, the CFPB has been at the center of intense political and policy debate, with its priorities changing dramatically as administrations change. The events of the past year or so under the leadership of Acting Directors chosen by President Trump, however, have taken that policy whiplash to a new level. In our latest Consumer Finance Monitor podcast released today, Alan Kaplinsky (the founder and former leader for 25 years of the Consumer Financial Services Group at our firm)...
info_outlineConsumer Finance Monitor
National bank preemption is headed toward another Supreme Court showdown. The Second Circuit has held that New York’s mortgage escrow-interest requirement is preempted, directly conflicting with the First Circuit’s decision upholding a comparable Rhode Island requirement and the Ninth Circuit’s decision allowing a similar California law to remain in effect. The OCC has sided with the Second Circuit, issuing final preemption regulations concluding that state laws requiring national banks to pay interest on mortgage escrow accounts are preempted. In the latest episode of the Consumer...
info_outlineConsumer Finance Monitor
Disclosure has long been one of the principal tools of consumer protection. The basic premise seems straightforward: if consumers are given better information about the terms of a transaction, they should be able to make better-informed decisions. But what if better disclosure works differently for different consumers? And what if a disclosure that improves decision-making overall can, in some circumstances, actually worsen outcomes for financially vulnerable consumers? Those are among the important and provocative questions explored in the latest episode released today of the Consumer Finance...
info_outlineConsumer Finance Monitor
In the latest episode of the Consumer Finance Monitor podcast that we are releasing today, we explore a topic that is becoming increasingly important for financial services companies and virtually every other business operating in today’s digital economy: how privacy, cybersecurity, and AI governance can be transformed from compliance obligations into sources of customer confidence, resilience, and competitive advantage. Alan Kaplinsky (founder, founder lease for 25 years and now Senior counsel of our Consumer Financial Services Group) hosts and interviews our guests. Our guests are Amy...
info_outlineConsumer Finance Monitor
The CFPB’s June 5, 2026 statement on “” presents creditors with a difficult, and potentially unprecedented, compliance dilemma. The Bureau says that when creditors are required to assess a consumer’s ability to repay, they may, and in some circumstances may be required to, consider information about the consumer’s immigration status if that information bears on the consumer’s current or reasonably expected future income. But how can creditors take immigration status into account without violating federal or state fair-lending laws that prohibit discrimination based on national...
info_outlineIn this episode of the Consumer Finance Monitor Podcast, host Alan Kaplinsky (founder, former chair for 25 years and now Senior Counsel) had the pleasure of speaking with Sam Levine, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP), about the agency’s evolving role as one of the most active local consumer protection regulators in the country.
Important note: This podcast was recorded prior to DCWP’s April 8, 2026 release of its proposed “click-to-cancel” rule addressing subscription practices. Alan recorded a description of the proposed rule which is at the end of the recording. We also wrote a separate blog about that significant development.
A Local Regulator with National Influence
From the outset, Commissioner Levine emphasized that DCWP is not simply a municipal agency focused on traditional licensing and enforcement, but rather a modern regulator tackling complex consumer protection issues that increasingly mirror those addressed at the federal level.
“Local enforcement can be incredibly impactful—we’re often closest to consumers and can move quickly to address emerging harms.”
He noted that New York City’s scale and diversity make it a uniquely important testing ground for innovative consumer protection strategies.
Executive Orders Driving Enforcement Priorities
A key backdrop to DCWP’s current activity is a pair of mayoral directives—Executive Order 9 and Executive Order 10—issued by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani on January 5, 2026 (shortly after he took office) which we have discussed in a prior blog post.
These Executive Orders signal a clear policy direction to fulfill his campaign promise to make life more affordable for everyday New Yorkers: an intensified focus on consumer protection, particularly in areas involving deceptive practices, hidden or “junk” fees, and recurring payment models. Executive Order 10, in particular, directs DCWP to prioritize enforcement against “subscription traps” and misleading recurring charge practices—laying the groundwork for the Department’s subsequent proposed “click-to-cancel” rule published on April 8, 2026.
Commissioner Levine made clear that these directives are not merely aspirational, but are actively shaping the agency’s enforcement and rulemaking agenda:
“We’re aligning our work with the Mayor’s directive to go after practices that frustrate consumers and undermine fair competition.”
Enforcement Priorities: Targeting Deceptive Practices
A central theme of our discussion was DCWP’s aggressive focus on deceptive and unconscionable trade practices, particularly in areas where consumers are most vulnerable.
Commissioner Levine highlighted the agency’s work in combatting:
1. Hidden fees and misleading pricing practices
2. Predatory lending and financial services abuses
3. Worker exploitation in the gig economy
4. Emerging digital marketplace risks
“We’re focused on conduct that distorts consumer choice—where people think they’re getting one thing but end up locked into something very different.”
He underscored that transparency and fairness are guiding principles behind DCWP’s enforcement agenda.
Final Debt Collection Rules: A Significant Regulatory Development
We also discussed DCWP’s recently finalized debt collection regulations, which we have analyzed in prior blog coverage. These rules represent one of the most significant updates to New York City’s debt collection framework in years.
Commissioner Levine emphasized that the rules are designed to modernize existing requirements and address evolving industry practices, including the increased use of digital communications.
“The goal is to ensure that debt collection practices keep pace with how consumers actually communicate today, while maintaining strong protections against harassment and abuse.”
Among other things, the rules clarify permissible communications, reinforce substantiation and disclosure requirements, and strengthen consumer protections in line with broader trends seen at the federal level.
These rules, which go effective later this year, apply not only to third-party collectors and buyers of consumer debt, but also to creditors of consumers whenever the debtor resides or is located in New York City.
Collaboration with Federal and State Regulators
Drawing on his prior experience at the Federal Trade Commission as Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Levine discussed the importance of coordination across jurisdictions.
“There’s a real opportunity for federal, state, and local regulators to work together and reinforce one another’s efforts.”
He explained that DCWP frequently collaborates with the FTC, the New York State Attorney General’s Office, and other enforcement bodies, particularly in cases involving multi-state or national conduct.
At the same time, he made clear that local regulators can lead:
“We don’t have to wait. If we see harm affecting New Yorkers, we’re going to act.”
Rulemaking as a Strategic Tool
In addition to enforcement, Levine emphasized DCWP’s increasing use of rulemaking to shape market behavior proactively.
“Rules give clarity to businesses and protections to consumers—they’re an important complement to case-by-case enforcement.”
He noted that clear rules can help level the playing field for companies that are already trying to do the right thing.
Focus on Financial Services and Marketplace Innovation
The conversation also explored DCWP’s interest in financial services, particularly as new products and delivery models emerge.
Levine pointed to risks associated with:
1. Fintech innovations that may outpace regulatory frameworks
2. Online platforms that obscure key terms or pricing
3. Products that rely heavily on consumer inertia or behavioral biases
“Innovation can be a good thing—but it can’t come at the expense of transparency or fairness.”
Practical Takeaways for Industry
For companies operating in or serving New York City, the message from DCWP is clear:
1. Expect active enforcement of deceptive practices
2. Monitor local regulatory developments, including mayoral directives and rulemaking initiatives
3. Prioritize clear disclosures and consumer-friendly processes
4. Anticipate continued focus on digital and subscription-based business models
“Our goal is straightforward: markets should work for consumers, not against them.”
Looking Ahead
Although our discussion did not cover it because it happened after our podcast was recorded, DCWP has since proposed a significant new rule targeting subscription practices—further underscoring the agency’s commitment to addressing modern consumer risks and reflecting the policy direction set by Executive Order 10.
Given Commissioner Levine’s leadership and experience, including his prior role at the FTC, DCWP is likely to remain at the forefront of consumer protection innovation.
Consumer Finance Monitor is hosted by Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel at Ballard Spahr, and the founder and former chair of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Group. We encourage listeners to subscribe to the podcast on their preferred platform for weekly insights into developments in the consumer finance industry.