loader from loading.io

Buying a Think Tank

The Public Sphere

Release Date: 05/10/2018

Pilot-Seminar on Work show art Pilot-Seminar on Work

The Public Sphere

This is a pilot episode for a podcast on the work. Original music by Samuel Haines.

info_outline
Free as in Market show art Free as in Market

The Public Sphere

Pete and Luke talk about Elizabeth Anderson’s Tanner Lectures in Human Values: "Liberty, Equality, and Private Government." Anderson says we don’t really understand the relationship between the “free market” and some of our most cherished political ideals, namely freedom and equality. This has lead us to overlook how the modern workplace has become politically authoritarian even as it is championed by free market ideologues.

info_outline
The New Left show art The New Left

The Public Sphere

Rafael Khachaturian and Sean Guillory visit to talk about their new article "Mapping the American Left." Both have been on the podcast before. Their article lists a few challenges faced by the Left in America.

info_outline
Reacting to the State of Emergency show art Reacting to the State of Emergency

The Public Sphere

In a shorter episode, Pete and Luke are astounded by President Trump's declaration of a State of Emergency in order to find money for his border wall. The Public Sphere is a podcast from Contrivers Review.

info_outline
Research Interests: Neoliberalism show art Research Interests: Neoliberalism

The Public Sphere

A discussion about neoliberalism as a political and theoretical concept arising out of research research and reading. The Public Sphere is a podcast from Contrivers' Review.

info_outline
The Literal Opium of the Masses show art The Literal Opium of the Masses

The Public Sphere

Pete and Luke discuss a controversial article from Andrew Sullivan, "America's New Religions," in New York Magazine. They debate the differences between small-L liberalism and small-C conservatism in political theory. They also probe the role played by religion in providing the background cultural resources for stable political disagreements (as Sullivan seems to believe it must).

info_outline
Representing the Working Class show art Representing the Working Class

The Public Sphere

Pete talks with frequent guest Wes Bishop about how politics (mis-)characterizes and stereotypes the working class.

info_outline
Partisanship show art Partisanship

The Public Sphere

Pete and Luke discuss a few articles about party politics in America. The Public Sphere is a podcast from Contrivers Review.

info_outline
Reconsidering Fascism in America show art Reconsidering Fascism in America

The Public Sphere

On this episode, Luke and Pete discuss "Scary Clowns,” an article in the Baffler by Brendan O'Conner. Luke begins with a monologue about his growing fear of extremist right-wing violence. We consider the connections between more mainstream conservative groups and fascist groups like the Proud Boys. We discuss the racial polarization of politics, and how race has crystalized into a political differentiator. Finally, we consider the complicity by silence of the GOP.

info_outline
Ryan Zinke and Public Use show art Ryan Zinke and Public Use

The Public Sphere

Pete and Luke discuss Ryan Zinke, the scandal-ridden Secretary of the Interior. What does "public land for public use" mean? What is an "America First" energy policy? They also briefly revisit last week's topic, Matthew Whitaker, the newly appointed acting Attorney General. The Public Sphere is a podcast from Contrivers Review.

info_outline
 
More Episodes

Free speech is a core tenet of our democratic and academic systems. But as in politics, universities are increasingly under siege by large donors carrying bags of cash. What do billions of dollars entitle you to? Does it entitle you to shape what is taught and researched at a public university? How can you tell when or if ideology is subverting core institutional values?

These are the questions at the heart of controversies over the Charles Koch Foundation donating millions of dollars to US universities. The spirit of the questions also applies to other billionaires making donations like Phil Knight or George Soros, but the Charles Koch Foundation has stirred more controversy in part because of the lack of transparency around many of these donations and the strings that have come attached to the money, such as influence in faculty hiring, scholarship and fellowship awards, and curriculum decisions. They’ve also drawn attention because some feel that the far-right ideology of Koch funded “university-based research centers” may be itself be so extreme as to cast doubt on the scholarly validity of the research it produces and teaches.

We’ll be talking mainly about George Mason University today. GMU is a public university in northern VA that has received $95.5 million of that $142 million donated by Charles Koch Foundation since 2005. On Tuesday, April 24 a student group on campus, Transparent GMU went to trial against the GMU and their fundraising arm, The George Mason University Foundation to release documents under the FOIA. While that case is still undecided, documents detailing the donor agreements were released, providing us with direct evidence that the Kochs dictated hiring and other academic policies, which GMU is now admitting.