loader from loading.io

"They Saw It Coming: The 19th-Century Libertarian Critique of Fascism" - The Long Library, Ep.4

The Long Library

Release Date: 04/02/2025

“The Justice and Prudence of War: Toward a Libertarian Analysis” - The Long Library, Ep.5 show art “The Justice and Prudence of War: Toward a Libertarian Analysis” - The Long Library, Ep.5

The Long Library

This episode, Roderick and I discuss his essay “The Justice and Prudence of War: Toward a Libertarian Analysis.” Written during the Iraq War, but unfortunately timelier than ever, this essay navigates the messy conceptual battlefield of wartime ethics and avoids the pitfalls of both purely nonviolent pacifism on the one hand and violent aggression on the other. Why must the justified use of force satisfy conditions not only of defensiveness but proportionality? Should force ever be used against innocents? What about innocent threats? Innocent shields? These are some of the most challenging...

info_outline
"They Saw It Coming: The 19th-Century Libertarian Critique of Fascism" - The Long Library, Ep.4

The Long Library

On this episode of The Long Library, Cory Massimino interviews Roderick Long about his essay “They Saw It Coming: The 19th-Century Libertarian Critique of Fascism" (link: ). Written over ten years ago about arguments written over one hundred years ago, this essay is as timely as ever here in 2025. Roderick shows that 19th-century libertarians such as Gustave de Molinari, Frédéric Bastiat, Voltairine de Cleyre, Herbert Spencer, William Graham Sumner, and others warned against the very tendencies — “militarism, corporatism, regimentation, nationalist chauvinism, plutocracy in populist...

info_outline
“Eudaimonism and Non-Aggression “Eudaimonism and Non-Aggression"

The Long Library

Today I talk with Roderick about his 2013 blog post “,” one of many early 2010s blog posts across the libertarian ecosystem debating the pros and cons of the non-aggression principle, or NAP. As usual, Roderick thinks both sides make some good points, but ultimately lands on the side of the NAP. Though in order to avoid the common pitfalls of the NAP, such as downgrading it to a mere rule of thumb or applying it in a reductionist manner, Roderick counsels libertarians to turn to Ancient Greek philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle in order to situate the NAP in the broader...

info_outline
“Corporations versus the Market; or, Whip Conflation” show art “Corporations versus the Market; or, Whip Conflation”

The Long Library

“Corporations versus the Market; or, Whip Conflation Now” was the lead essay of Cato Unbound’s 2008 discussion “When Corporations Hate Markets” and later included in C4SS’s “Markets Not Capitalism.” The essay is one-half political economy, sketching out the basic ideas behind freed-market anti-capitalism, and one-half political psychology, exploring the various pitfalls leading virtually everyone, from libertarians to conservatives to socialists, to conflate freed markets with capitalism and thereby bolster the mutually reinforcing power of both capitalism on the one hand and...

info_outline
"10 Objections to Anarchism"

The Long Library

In our first episode I talk to Roderick about his 2004 monograph “”  This is one of the first things I had ever read by Roderick and greatly hastened my journey to anarchism. It remains one of the most concise, accessible, wide-ranging, and good faith introductions to libertarian anarchist arguments and I always include it among the zines when I table for C4SS at book fairs and conferences. It makes for a great entry point into not only libertarian anarchist thought but The Long Library itself. I hope you all enjoy our first stop on this exploration of the writings of Roderick...

info_outline
 
More Episodes

On this episode of The Long Library, Cory Massimino interviews Roderick Long about his essay “They Saw It Coming: The 19th-Century Libertarian Critique of Fascism" (link: https://c4ss.org/content/15126).

Written over ten years ago about arguments written over one hundred years ago, this essay is as timely as ever here in 2025. Roderick shows that 19th-century libertarians such as Gustave de Molinari, Frédéric Bastiat, Voltairine de Cleyre, Herbert Spencer, William Graham Sumner, and others warned against the very tendencies — “militarism, corporatism, regimentation, nationalist chauvinism, plutocracy in populist guise, the call for ‘strong leaders’ and ‘national greatness,’ the glorification of conflict over commerce and of brute force over intellect” — that would decades later culminate in fascism. At a time when many libertarians range from tepid to excited about incipient fascism, it’s important to remember that wasn’t always the case, that there was a time when libertarians consistently opposed these evils and their catastrophic combination, that there was a time when libertarians were libertarians. These 19th-century anti-fascists have much to teach us about 21st-century fascism and, as Roderick reminds us, “their fallen banner is ours to pick up.”