91326 hr2
Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
This hour of Eye on the Target Radio focuses almost entirely on the changing legal landscape surrounding the National Firearms Act (NFA), particularly the recent elimination of the $200 tax on suppressors, short-barreled rifles (SBRs), and short-barreled shotguns (SBSs). Amanda and Rob explain that the NFA actually covers six categories—SBRs, SBSs, suppressors, machine guns, destructive devices, and certain “any other weapons”—but that the current legal fight is concentrated on the first three. They describe the elimination of the tax as part of a broader strategy to dismantle or...
info_outline
91326 hr1
Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
The latest episode of Eye on the Target Radio focuses heavily on what Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell see as a series of important victories and potential turning points for Second Amendment rights. They begin by discussing the impact of the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision, particularly its requirement that modern firearm restrictions be consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. They express frustration with courts and governments reaching back to obscure English laws from the 1300s to justify contemporary restrictions, arguing that American...
info_outline
9626 hr2
Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
The episode of Eye on the Target Radio opens with Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussing New York’s efforts to restrict 3D-printed firearms and the publication of firearm-design files online. They focus on the conflict between New York officials and Defense Distributed founder Cody Wilson, who argues that firearm designs—including numerous military-specification drawings—are already widely available. The hosts question how effectively New York could regulate information that is distributed over the internet, arguing that once a technology or design becomes known, attempts to...
info_outline
9626 hr1
Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
The episode of Eye on the Target Radio opens with Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussing the transition from cap-and-ball firearms to fixed ammunition, using the example to compare technological transitions with modern changes such as gasoline, electric, and hybrid vehicles. The conversation then turns to major Second Amendment cases before the Supreme Court. The hosts discuss the Court’s decision to hear two consolidated AR-15 cases, Grant v. Higgins and Vera Montez v. Cook County, with oral arguments scheduled for December 2, 2026. They note that numerous organizations,...
info_outline
83026 hr2
Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
The discussion focuses on the changing legal status of the National Firearms Act (NFA), particularly the removal of the $200 tax on suppressors, short-barreled rifles (SBRs), and short-barreled shotguns (SBSs). Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell explain that the NFA actually covers six categories—SBRs, SBSs, suppressors, machine guns, destructive devices, and certain “any other weapons”—and emphasize that eliminating the tax does not automatically eliminate every NFA requirement. They discuss how complicated the rules have become over the decades, using examples such as the Thompson...
info_outline
83026 hr1
Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
The discussion focuses on the evolving legal status of the National Firearms Act (NFA), particularly the recent elimination of the $200 tax on suppressors, short-barreled rifles (SBRs), and short-barreled shotguns (SBSs). Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell explain that the NFA actually covers six categories—SBRs, SBSs, suppressors, machine guns, destructive devices, and certain “any other weapons”—and emphasize that eliminating the tax did not automatically eliminate all of the paperwork and regulatory requirements. They describe the change as part of a broader, strategic effort to...
info_outline
82326 hr2
Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
The discussion focuses on the rapidly changing legal status of the National Firearms Act (NFA), particularly suppressors, short-barreled rifles (SBRs), and short-barreled shotguns (SBSs). Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell explain that the NFA actually covers six categories—SBRs, SBSs, suppressors, machine guns, destructive devices, and certain “any other weapons”—but recent legislative and court actions have concentrated on the first three. They describe the elimination of the $200 NFA tax as part of the 2026 budget legislation as a strategic step toward dismantling portions of the NFA...
info_outline
82326 hr1
Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio focuses heavily on the changing legal landscape surrounding the National Firearms Act (NFA), particularly the removal of the $200 tax on suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns. Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell explain that the NFA actually covers six categories—short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, suppressors, machine guns, destructive devices, and certain “any other weapons”—and emphasize that the recent legislation only directly addresses the first three. They discuss how the $200 tax, originally...
info_outline
81626 hr2
Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
This episode focuses on the rapidly changing legal status of National Firearms Act (NFA) regulations, particularly the $200 tax on suppressors, short-barreled rifles (SBRs), and short-barreled shotguns (SBSs). Amanda Suffecoo,l and Rob Campbell explain that the NFA contains six major categories—SBRs, SBSs, suppressors, machine guns, destructive devices, and certain “any other weapons”—but that the current legal fight is primarily centered on the first three. They describe the removal of the $200 tax through the “Big Beautiful Bill” as part of a broader strategy to gradually...
info_outline
81626 hr1
Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns
This episode of Eye on the Target Radio is starts with Gun Prom and gun guru's and then at the bottom of the hour has Charlie Cook join. Charlie is the coordinator of the 2026 AmmCon that is being held in Dallas September 25, just prior to SAF.org and its GRPC.
info_outlineThis episode of Eye on the Target Radio begins with Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussing their experience at GunCon 2026 in Niles, Ohio. They describe the event as a well-organized gathering that combines media access, vendor demonstrations, VIP experiences, and public attendance. The hosts were impressed by the large turnout and the opportunity attendees had to interact directly with firearms industry personalities, content creators, and manufacturers. A major highlight was an appearance by Vivek Ramaswamy, who answered Second Amendment-related questions from attendees. Amanda and Rob praised him for providing detailed answers rather than political talking points. They specifically noted his rejection of government-funded or government-mandated firearms training programs, arguing that private organizations and existing industry programs are better suited to provide firearms education.
The discussion then turns to the firearms community's culture of mentorship. Amanda argues that experienced gun owners are often eager to introduce newcomers to shooting sports, frequently volunteering their time, equipment, ammunition, and expertise to help others learn safely. The hosts contrast this welcoming attitude with the misconception that firearms ownership requires extensive formal government involvement. They emphasize that most gun owners are enthusiastic about sharing knowledge and encouraging responsible participation in the shooting community.
Moving back to GunCon, Amanda and Rob describe the appeal of the event as a place where attendees can meet online personalities and firearms reviewers they normally only see through YouTube, social media, or podcasts. They mention several well-known content creators and discuss some of the more interesting firearms and products they encountered. Among the highlights were a suppressed M1 Carbine that impressed them with its quiet operation and handling characteristics, as well as an unusual knife-gun combination that incorporated a small revolver into the handle of a folding knife. They found the design novel and intriguing, although they acknowledged that it raised practical questions about usability and accuracy.
After several sponsor and public service announcements, the hosts transition into a discussion of firearm restrictions imposed by homeowners associations. Amanda references a Florida HOA that attempted to ban firearms before backing down following pressure from state officials. She then discusses a South Carolina HOA that implemented restrictions on firearms in common areas, including pools, clubhouses, sidewalks, and parking lots. The hosts criticize the policy as impractical because residents would effectively be unable to transport firearms between their homes and vehicles. Amanda argues that HOA leadership can significantly influence community policies and encourages gun owners living in such communities to become involved in HOA governance. Both hosts contend that firearm bans create an environment that may attract criminals by signaling that residents are unlikely to be armed.
The program next examines recent developments concerning concealed carry rights for adults aged 18 to 20. Amanda explains that many states still impose restrictions on younger adults despite recognizing them as legal adults for numerous other purposes. She highlights actions in Florida and West Virginia that expand carry rights for individuals in this age group. Florida’s legal developments involve court rulings finding restrictions unconstitutional, while West Virginia lowered the age requirement for permitless concealed carry from 21 to 18. Amanda views these developments as further extensions of the legal reasoning established after the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision and argues that constitutional rights should apply equally to adults regardless of whether they are 18 or 21 years old.
The conversation then shifts to concerns about artificial intelligence and the reliability of information generated by AI systems. Amanda recounts examples discussed within the firearms media community in which AI-generated research allegedly produced inaccurate or fabricated information. She argues that AI-generated summaries should always be verified through original sources and cites a story involving firearms journalist Mark Walters as an example of why users should not automatically trust AI outputs. Drawing on her engineering background, Amanda compares reviewing AI-generated information to reviewing work produced by a new employee: the results may appear convincing but still require careful verification and critical thinking.
Later in the episode, the hosts discuss what they view as a series of legislative proposals from gun-control advocates. Amanda argues that many recent proposals are unlikely to survive constitutional scrutiny under the Supreme Court’s current Second Amendment framework. One proposal would create a federally managed database of gun-violence-prevention research overseen by the CDC. Amanda expresses skepticism, arguing that such a database could selectively promote certain research while ignoring other studies. She references criminologist John Lott and claims that existing crime data have sometimes been revised in ways that affect public perception of trends.
The hosts also discuss proposals involving mandatory mental-health evaluations for owners of certain semiautomatic rifles. Amanda criticizes the concept as both impractical and constitutionally questionable. She raises concerns about who would conduct the evaluations, who would pay for them, and how such requirements could be administered fairly. The conversation expands into broader concerns about privacy, social media monitoring, and government oversight of lawful gun owners.
The final major topic focuses on suppressors and ongoing debates surrounding their regulation. Amanda references statements from lawmakers who characterize suppressors as tools primarily associated with criminal activity. The hosts reject that characterization, arguing that suppressors function more like hearing-protection devices that reduce noise rather than eliminate it. They emphasize that suppressors do not make firearms silent, comparing them to automobile mufflers that reduce but do not eliminate engine noise. Amanda views proposals such as suppressor buyback programs as examples of legislation driven more by misconceptions from popular culture than by practical realities.
Throughout the episode, Amanda and Rob repeatedly return to themes of individual responsibility, skepticism toward government regulation, support for firearms education, and the defense of Second Amendment rights. The show combines reports from GunCon, commentary on current legal and political developments, criticism of gun-control proposals, and discussions of firearm culture, training, and community engagement.