How retaliation risk complicates fraud investigations

Retaliation — actual or perceived — can make fraud investigations more complex and less effective.

 

In this episode of the Journal of Accountancy podcast, Fred Kohm, CPA/CFF, a partner at Grant Thornton, summarizes insights from the latest FVS Eye on Fraud report and explains how nuanced workplace dynamics can affect whistleblower cases. Kohm shares examples of subtle retaliation and explains how forensic accountants, auditors, and other professionals can recognize retaliation risks and strengthen investigative practices. 

“Whether you are a forensic accountant, an auditor, or perhaps a CPA in another role …, be aware that retaliation is real,” Kohm said.

Editor’s note: The spring 2026 FVS Eye on Fraud report is available for download at the link above. It becomes exclusive to FVS Section members after July 10.

What you’ll learn from this episode:

• Defining “retaliation” in the context of a whistleblower complaint and investigation.
• Why fear of retaliation can limit the information whistleblowers share.
• How retaliation can show up in subtle ways, from exclusion to heightened scrutiny.
• What makes retaliation a complex challenge for forensic accountants gathering evidence.
• The strategies that Kohm recommends to help organizations reduce retaliation risk.
• Why awareness and objectivity are critical when evaluating fraud allegations.