Attribution to Russian GRU for 2015 and 2016 Cyber Attacks on Ukraine Energy Power Stations
Release Date: 05/25/2021
Democratizing Ransomware as a Service with Nisos Intelligence Advisory Paul Malcomb
Know Your Adversary™
In Episode 91 of TheCyber5, we are joined by Paul Malcomb, Intelligence Advisory for Nisos. Paul brings over 15 years of experience from Fortune 500 security teams and the public sector including incident response, threat intelligence, and third-party risk management. In this episode, Paul explains how the ransomware-related ecosystem is evolving and provides insights to some of the newer threats organizations face. Below are the three major takeaways: Ransomware actors no longer need to be end-to-end capable and are now very decentralized: Gone...
info_outline
Insider Threat Extortion Attempt of $300,000 Leads to Arrest
Know Your Adversary™
In Episode 11 of Know Your Adversary®, we chat with an undisclosed security team that prevented an insider threat actor from extorting $300,000 from a global company. The result of the six months long investigation resulted in the arrest of the suspect who, as it turns out, was motivated by pride and money. One morning, the security team received an email asking for $300,000 as an extortion payment or the data would be released. Upon showing “proof of life” that the attacker possessed the data, it became clear they maintained elevated access beyond that of someone living abroad in...
info_outline
Compare and Contrast Saudi Aramco and Colonial Pipeline Cyber Attacks
Know Your Adversary™
In Episode 10 of Know Your Adversary™, ICE Miller Managing Partner discusses the difference between the 2012 Saudi Aramco destructive cyber attacks and the 2021 Colonial Pipeline ransomware attacks. In 2012, Iran attacked Saudi Arabia-based Aramco’s information technology (IT) infrastructure, denying service to the entire company to the point that Aramco gave gas away for free. Fast forward to 2021, a Russia-based ransomware gang Darkside attacked the IT infrastructure of Colonial Pipeline, particularly the billing system. When Colonial Pipeline couldn’t determine how to charge...
info_outline
OneSight Backstage Management System: Attributing a Chinese Marketing Firm’s Tools to Disinformation Campaigns
Know Your Adversary™
In Episode 9 of Know Your Adversary™, Nisos researcher Zeshan Aziz revealed that Chinese commercial marketing firm OneSight, developed a sophisticated social media management and monitoring system called OneSight Backstage Management System to propagate political disinformation against the Uyghur community. The research indicates the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) likely conducted the campaign. Previous research into a breach of OneSight identified sophisticated social media surveillance tooling was used for widespread disinformation campaigns across many prominent Chinese and U.S. social...
info_outline
Human Intelligence Recruitment of an Employee to Deploy Ransomware
Know Your Adversary™
In Episode 8 of Know Your Adversary™, we detail an August 2020 investigation when a Russian gang member named Egor Igorevich Kriuchkov traveled to the United States to recruit an employee of a US-based manufacturing company and to install ransomware on the network via USB thumb drive. He offered the employee $500,000, and if the operation was successful, the Russian gang was going to extort the company for $5,000,000. Fortunately, the company prepared the employee for this type of scenario and reported Egor. A subsequent FBI investigation arrested Egor and deported him back to Moscow,...
info_outline
Investigating the T-Mobile Hack: Direct Threat Actor Engagement with John Binns
Know Your Adversary™
In Episode 7 of Know Your Adversary™, we detail the August 2021 compromise disclosure of T-Mobile. In August 2021, John Binns, a US Citizen living in Turkey, disclosed that he compromised T-Mobile customer data. While he initially stated his motivations were in response to physical abuse, further investigation indicated that Binns was driven primarily by financial gain. Our guest is ShadowByte Head of Research, Vinny Troia, a security researcher who directly interacted with John Binns.
info_outline
Supply Chain Attacks Escalation and Evolution by Foreign Nation States
Know Your Adversary™
In Episode 6 of Know Your Adversary™, we detail a previous supply chain attack from 2007 and then again in 2015 against a security software company. Our guest is Lucidum CEO, Joel Fulton. Foreign nation states conducted detailed recon and knew when a router was going to be rebooted for maintenance updates. Upon rebooting the router, the attackers “slipped through the crack” and into the software provider’s network by exploiting a vulnerability of the router model.
info_outline
Nisos Attributes and Unmasks Insider Threat Saboteurs Who Caused $1M in Business Loss
Know Your Adversary™
In Episode 5 of Know Your Adversary™, we discuss a 2018 Nisos insider threat investigation of network sabotage that caused almost $1M in business operations loss. Following a recent M&A transaction, IT engineers of the nearly acquired subsidiary were upset with their new roles. The results of the sabotage were a complete subsidiary network outage for over a week and a subsequent Nisos, partner, and FBI investigation that led to the arrest and detention of one co-conspirator.
info_outline
Attribution to Russian GRU for 2015 and 2016 Cyber Attacks on Ukraine Energy Power Stations
Know Your Adversary™
In Episode 4 of Know Your Adversary, we are joined by Gigamon Senior Manager Joe Slowik. Our discussion takes a look into the world of Russian nation-state hacking units, particularly the GRU and the SVR. We take a deep dive into the 2015 and 2016 cyber attacks against the Ukrainian power grid and review how Russia’s capabilities are increasing in sophistication, mainly through lateral hand-offs between the teams of hackers operating in IT and OT environments.
info_outline
Identifying and Disrupting Malicious Bot Programmers and Security Researchers
Know Your Adversary™
In Episode 3 of Know Your Adversary™ we are joined by Shawn Valle, former Chief Information Security Officer at Rapid 7. Our discussion takes a look into the world of online platform abuse and fraud. We explore threat actors’ use of bots to make bulk purchases online. We also tell the story of a security researcher on the wrong side of the law. Learn about the path he took from disclosing a breach to demanding a ransom payment.
info_outlineIn Episode 4 of Know Your Adversary, we are joined by Gigamon Senior Manager Joe Slowik. Our discussion takes a look into the world of Russian nation-state hacking units, particularly the GRU and the SVR. We take a deep dive into the 2015 and 2016 cyber attacks against the Ukrainian power grid and review how Russia’s capabilities are increasing in sophistication, mainly through lateral hand-offs between the teams of hackers operating in IT and OT environments. We discuss the technical details of such operations and how enterprises can better defend themselves while considering the geopolitical ramifications, mainly that GRU tends to blatantly cause disruption and outages while SVR moves more “low and slow” for intelligence collection.
Key takeaways from the episode include:
Different teams with different skill sets were seen in the 2016 cyber attacks on the Ukraine power grid by Russian Unit 74455. This same level of growing maturity was not seen in the previous 2015 Ukraine power grid attack. In 2015, Russian hackers, known in the security industry as “Sandworm,” infiltrated a Ukrainian power grid and successfully “moved laterally” from the information technology environment to the operational technology environment that controlled the electrical grid. They caused a massive outage that became the first known successful cyber attack on a power grid. Then again, in 2016, they conducted the same operation. However, as they moved to the operational technology environment, it was clear a different set of operators were testing other tools that automated the exploitation process. While testing tools on a live OT production environment was not expert tradecraft, it nevertheless demonstrated Russia’s increasing desires to build this tradecraft in people and tools on multiple fronts of computer network exploitation teams.
Lessons for Protecting Enterprise:
- Visibility is still critical. If a security team can’t protect what they cannot see, critical infrastructure won’t have the chance to distinguish between different nation-state hacking units.
- MTTA and MTTR: Mean time to alert and respond should matter significantly for security teams depending on who the actor is. If it’s clear it’s the GRU, they have experience conducting disruptive attacks, and response should be immediate. However, if it’s the SVR, while the time to respond should be swift, they are probably operating for intelligence collection purposes and not likely to disrupt business operations by turning out the lights.