Season 2: Episode 3: A Discussion of Grutter v. Bollinger
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Release Date: 09/15/2021
Season 3: Episode 5: RBG, Justice Marshall and the Death Penalty (Part 2)
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
In Season 3, Episode 5 of Notorious, we continue to discuss the ’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment – from Justice Marshall’s viewpoint, as well as Justice Ginsburg’s viewpoint. This topic is broken up into two episodes, with Episode 5 focusing mostly on Justice Ginsburg’s views and how those views intersect with those of Justice Marshall. attorneys , and discuss the history of the death penalty, as well as the cases of and , and the impact of their legal legacy on future capital punishment jurisprudence. Related Resources: For a selection of Justice...
info_outline
Season 3: Episode 4: RBG, Justice Marshall and the Death Penalty (Part 1)
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
In Season 3, Episode 4 of Notorious, we discuss the ’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment – from Justice Marshall’s viewpoint, as well as Justice Ginsburg’s viewpoint. This topic is broken up into two episodes, with Episode 4 focusing mostly on Justice Marshall’s views and historical context. attorneys , and discuss the history of the death penalty, as well as the cases of and , and the impact of their legal legacy on future capital punishment jurisprudence. Related Resources: For a selection of Justice Ginsburg’s writings, see , edited by . For more...
info_outline
Season 3: Episode 3: Justice Ginsburg and Justice Marshall’s Views on Campaign Finance
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
In Season 3, Episode 3 of Notorious, we discuss campaign finance, from legal viewpoints of Justices Ginsburg and Marshall. Among the issues discussed are what it means to participate in a fair and free election and the intersection between money and its impact on free speech during a political campaign. Guests will include Patterson Belknap Partner and Patterson Belknap Associates and . Related Resources: For a selection of Justice Ginsburg’s writings, see , edited by . For more information about , see . For information about becoming a guest on Notorious, email . For questions or...
info_outline
Justice Marshall & Justice Ginsburg First Amendment Jurisprudence
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
In Season 3, Episode 2 of Notorious, we discuss the First Amendment and how it was addressed by Justice Ginsburg and Justice Marshall. Specifically, this episode will cover Justice Ginsburg’s and Justice Marshall’s jurisprudence concerning the religious clauses of the First Amendment, including the Establish Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. Guests will include Patterson Belknap Partner ; Patterson Belknap Counsel ; and Patterson Belknap Associates and . Related Resources: For a selection of Justice Ginsburg’s writings, see , edited by . For more information about , see . For...
info_outline
Season 3, Episode 1: Justice Marshall & Justice Ginsburg’s Judicial Philosophies
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
In Season 3, Episode 1 of Notorious, we discuss Justice Thurgood Marshall’s and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s contributions to the Civil Rights Movement, and parallels and differences between their legal and judicial strategies. Guests will include , who currently sits on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and previously sat on the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey; , Patterson Belknap Of Counsel and former judicial clerk to Justice Marshall; Patterson Belknap Partner ; and Patterson Belknap Associate . Related Resources: For a selection of Justice...
info_outline
Season 2: Episode 6: 2020-2021 Supreme Court Term
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
In Season 2, Episode 6 of Notorious, we discuss the 2020-2021 Supreme Court Term and look back at specific cases and instances where Justice Ginsburg’s influence is still alive and well. Specifically, we discuss the cases, FDA v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System, Tanzin v. Tanvir, and Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
info_outline
Season 2: Episode 5: A Discussion of Ricci v. DeStefano
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
In Season 2, Episode 5 of Notorious, we discuss the case of Ricci v. DeStefano, which involved the question of whether the city of New Haven, Connecticut violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act when it rejected the results of a civil service exam given to firefighters. The results of the exam showed that white candidates had out-performed minority candidates and the question was raised as to whether the exam was discriminatory.
info_outline
Season 2: Episode 4: A Discussion of Adarand Construction v. Pena
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
In Season 2, Episode 4 of Notorious, we discuss the case of Adarand Construction v. Pena, which involved whether a federal statute, which provided for favor treatment to a suspect class to remedy past discrimination, violated the Equal Protection Clause as embodied in the Fifth Amendment.
info_outline
Season 2: Episode 3: A Discussion of Grutter v. Bollinger
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
In Season 2, Episode 3 of Notorious, we discuss the case of Grutter v. Bollinger, which involved the question of whether a law school admissions policy that considered race as a factor in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
info_outline
Season 2: Episode 2: A Discussion of Gonzales v. Carhart
Notorious: The Legal Legacy of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
In Season 2, Episode 2 of Notorious, we discuss the case of Gonzales v. Carhart, which involved the Supreme Court’s consideration of the constitutionality of The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 (“the Act”). In 2003, Congress passed and President Bush signed the Act into law. Dr. LeRoy Carhart and other physicians, who performed late term abortions, sued to stop the Act from going into effect. A federal district court agreed and ruled the Act unconstitutional.
info_outlineIn Season 2, Episode 3 of Notorious, we discuss the case of Grutter v. Bollinger, which involved the question of whether a law school admissions policy that considered race as a factor in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The 5-4 majority opinion decided that the law school’s admission policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause and was written by Justice O’Connor and joined in whole by Justice Ginsburg, Justice Stevens, and Justice Breyer. The Court found that the law school’s stated interest that it wanted to maintain diversity of its student body was a compelling government interest and that compelling interest withstood strict scrutiny by the Court.
Justice Ginsburg filed a concurrence, joined by Justice Breyer, agreeing in the judgment and in the overall opinion, but elaborating on Justice O’Connor’s point in reference to the timeline she expected universities and other institutions to maintain race as one of the considerations that go into the admissions process.
Patterson Belknap attorneys Michelle Bufano, Alejandro Cruz, and Amir Badat discuss Justice Ginsburg’s impact on this case.
Related Resources:
For a selection of Justice Ginsburg’s writings, see Decisions and Dissents of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Selection, edited by Corey Brettschneider.
For more information about Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, see www.pbwt.com.
For information about becoming a guest on Notorious, email Michelle Bufano.
For questions or more information about Notorious, email Jenni Dickson.
Also, check out the Patterson Belknap podcast, How to Build A Nation in 15 Weeks.
Related People: