Belgium: More Than Tasty Chocolates — How NATO’s Capital Became the Perfect Cover for the Modern Network of Human and Sex Traffickers, Pornhub, Wall Street Financiers, and Consultants to Dodge BILLIONS in taxes. Under the Habsburg Origins.

“Belgium: The world calls it neutral. The traffickers call it home.”

.

Clips Played:  Why Did King Leopold II of Belgium Kill The Congolese People?

Music:  Johnny Nash - I Can See Clearly Now (Official Audio)

 

King Leopold II's Son Was Born With A Chilling Deformity - YouTube

Belgian Princess Condemns Her Family’s Brutal Colonial History in Congo & Calls For Reparations

Belgian X-Dossiers of the Dutroux Affair: the Accused

ISGP - Alleged assassinations in Belgium

Belgium's X-Dossiers of the Dutroux Affair: The victim-witnesses

Beyond the Dutroux Affair: The Reality of Protected Child Abuse and Snuff Networks

 

What Do Netflix, Pornhub, Gaming Giants, Gambling Sites, Wall Street & Private Equity Have in Common? Moving Billions Across Borders to Cheat Billions in Tax—Khazar Trade Routes to the Knights of Malta & the Car Bomb Murder of Daphne Caruana Galizia.

 

Do you have a psychopath in your life?  The best way to find out is read my book.  BOOK *FREE* Download – Psychopath In Your Life4

Support is Appreciated: Support the Show – Psychopath In Your Life

Tune in: Podcast Links – Psychopath In Your Life

UPDATED:      TOP PODS – Psychopath In Your Life

Google Maps My HOME Address:  309 E. Klug Avenue, Norfolk, NE  68701   SMART Meters & Timelines – Psychopath In Your Life

NEW:  My old discussion forum with last 10 years of victim stories, is back online.  Psychopath Victim Support Community | Forums powered by UBB.threads™

Belgium’s history is deeply tied to the Habsburg family, one of Europe’s most powerful dynasties. The connection began in 1477, when Mary of Burgundy married Maximilian of Habsburg. Her rich lands — including what is now Belgium — passed into Habsburg hands, joining them to an empire that stretched across Europe. Their grandson, Charles V, was born in Ghent and ruled a vast realm that included Spain, Austria, and the Low Countries.

When he gave up his throne in 1556, Belgium became part of the Spanish Habsburg empire, while the northern provinces broke away to form the Protestant Dutch Republic. For the next century and a half, the southern provinces (modern Belgium) stayed under Catholic Spanish rule, serving as a key outpost of Habsburg power. After the War of the Spanish Succession, control shifted to the Austrian branch of the family in 1713. The Austrian Habsburgs modernized the administration and supported the arts, but their reforms sparked revolts like the Brabant Revolution of 1789. French troops invaded a few years later, ending more than three centuries of Habsburg influence in Belgium.

The Belgian royal family, the House of Leopold, is connected to the Habsburg world through marriage and shared aristocratic circles, though it represents a different dynasty — the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. When Belgium gained independence in 1830, the new country needed a monarch who could balance European powers. The throne went to Leopold I, a German prince from the Coburg line, but one deeply tied to the Habsburgs through his family’s long-standing alliances with Austria.

Throughout the 19th century, the Belgian royal house maintained close relations with the Habsburg court in Vienna, often marrying into Habsburg or Habsburg-connected families. This helped secure Belgium’s legitimacy as a Catholic, conservative monarchy at a time when much of Europe was reshaping after Napoleon’s wars. In this sense, the Leopolds carried forward a Habsburg legacy of dynastic diplomacy, blending Central-European royal traditions with Belgium’s new national identity.

Early U.S. Institutional Abuse Cases (1980s–early 1990s)

Year(s)	Case / Location	Summary
1983–1990	McMartin Preschool Case – California, USA	One of the first major child-abuse trials linked to a daycare. Began in Manhattan Beach, California. Allegations of ritualistic abuse; enormous media coverage. All defendants were ultimately acquitted, but the case shaped public attitudes about hidden abuse and “Satanic panic.”
1986–1987	Presidio Child Development Center – San Francisco, USA (U.S. Army Base)	Children at a daycare on the Presidio military base accused several staff, including a soldier, of sexual abuse. The case involved federal jurisdiction and questions about military oversight. Prosecutions were limited; the facility was later closed.
1988–1990s	West Point Daycare / U.S. Military Academy – New York, USA	Similar pattern of allegations in the military childcare system; investigations stalled and were quietly dropped. No convictions, but documentation later cited as evidence of institutional suppression within military structures.

---

2. European Parallels and the Dutroux Affair (1990s)

Year(s)	Case / Location	Summary
1995–1996 (arrests)	Marc Dutroux Case – Belgium	Belgian electrician and convicted pedophile Marc Dutroux was arrested for the kidnapping, imprisonment, and murder of several young girls. The case exposed deep failures in Belgian police, justice, and political systems. Investigations suggested wider networks and possible complicity among elites, leading to public outrage and the 1996 “White March,” when hundreds of thousands demanded reform.
Late 1990s–2000s	Aftermath in Belgium	The Dutroux affair triggered major police and judicial reforms, but many Belgians believed high-level involvement was covered up. It remains one of Europe’s most infamous trafficking and corruption scandals.

---

3. 21st-Century Financial-Power and Celebrity Cases

Year(s)	Case / Location	Summary
2000s–2019	Jeffrey Epstein Network – U.S. and International	Wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein operated an extensive trafficking ring involving minors and high-profile clients. His 2019 arrest and later death in jail drew comparisons to earlier cases where money and influence protected perpetrators. His properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands formed part of an international pattern of elite impunity.
2023–2025 (ongoing)	Sean “Diddy” Combs Allegations – USA	Multiple lawsuits and federal raids targeted the music mogul for alleged sexual abuse, trafficking, and violence within his business empire. Though distinct from Epstein’s operation, the investigations have revived debate about celebrity power, coercion, and systemic protection in entertainment and finance.

---

4. Thematic Arc

• Institutions involved: schools, military bases, political systems, financial elites.

• Pattern: early exposure (1980s–90s) met with denial → later global re-examination (2000s–2020s).

• Common thread: allegations often implicate powerful figures or institutions, revealing how abuse can thrive behind reputations of trust and authority.

• Legacy: from McMartin to Epstein, public skepticism of official narratives has grown — and Belgium’s Dutroux scandal remains the European symbol of how deep such networks can run when oversight fails.

Burgundian to Habsburg Inheritance (1400s–1500s) 

• In the 15th century, much of present-day Belgium (then called the Low Countries) was ruled by the Dukes of Burgundy, who were vassals of the French crown but acted semi-independently. 

• When Mary of Burgundy, the last Burgundian ruler, married Maximilian of Habsburg in 1477, her territories passed into the Habsburg family.
  This union linked the wealthy Low Countries — including Flanders, Brabant, and Antwerp — with the vast Habsburg dominions in Central Europe. 

 

2. The Spanish Habsburgs (1556–1713)

• In 1556, Emperor Charles V, born in Ghent (in modern Belgium), abdicated and divided his empire: 

• His brother Ferdinand received Austria and the imperial title. 

• His son Philip II received Spain, the Americas, and the Spanish Netherlands (modern Belgium and Luxembourg). 

• Under the Spanish Habsburgs, Belgium became a Catholic stronghold during the Reformation, while the northern provinces (modern Netherlands) revolted and became Protestant. 

• The Eighty Years’ War (1568–1648) split the Low Countries: 

• North → independent Dutch Republic. 

• South (Belgium) → remained under Spanish Habsburg rule as the Spanish Netherlands. 

• Spanish control lasted until the early 1700s. Despite warfare and censorship, Flanders and Brabant remained prosperous trading and artistic regions (Rubens’ Antwerp flourished). 

 

3. The Austrian Habsburgs (1713–1794)

• The War of the Spanish Succession (1701–1714) ended Spanish Habsburg rule.
  The Treaty of Utrecht (1713) awarded the Austrian Habsburgs control of the Southern Netherlands. 

• Under the Austrian Netherlands, rulers like Emperor Charles VI and Maria Theresa sought to modernize administration and revive trade. 

• However, the enlightened absolutism of Joseph II (Maria Theresa’s son) — who tried to curb Church power and reform laws — provoked local resistance and the Brabant Revolution (1789–1790), briefly creating the short-lived United Belgian States. 

• Austrian control ended when French Revolutionary troops invaded in 1794; Belgium was annexed to France until Napoleon’s defeat in 1815. 

 

4. Legacy

• The Habsburg centuries tied Belgium to both Catholic Europe and the Spanish-Austrian imperial system. 

• Architecture, religion, and art from this period still dominate Belgian cities. 

• The empire’s bureaucratic and multilingual legacy (French, Dutch, Latin, and later German) contributed to the country’s complex linguistic and political divisions. 

Belgium and the Habsburgs: 1400s–1700s 

Period	Ruling Power / Monarch(s)	Title / Territory Name	Key Events and Notes
1384–1477	Burgundian Dukes (Philip the Bold → Charles the Bold)	Burgundian Netherlands	Wealthy trading cities (Bruges, Ghent, Antwerp) thrive under Burgundian administration; semi-independent from France.
1477–1556	Early Habsburgs (via marriage of Mary of Burgundy to Maximilian I)	Habsburg Netherlands	Habsburg dynasty begins ruling the Low Countries. Their grandson, Charles V, born in Ghent (1500), later rules the largest European empire of the 16th century.
1556–1713	Spanish Habsburgs (Philip II → Charles II)	Spanish Netherlands	After Charles V’s abdication, his son Philip II of Spain inherits the Low Countries. The Eighty Years’ War (1568–1648) splits north (Dutch Republic) and south (remains Catholic under Spain).
1648–1713	(continuing Spanish control)	Southern Netherlands	Treaty of Westphalia (1648) formalizes Dutch independence. Southern provinces (modern Belgium) remain loyal to Spain and Catholicism.
1713–1794	Austrian Habsburgs (Charles VI → Maria Theresa → Joseph II)	Austrian Netherlands	Treaty of Utrecht (1713) transfers the Southern Netherlands to Austria. Reforms and Enlightenment influence under Maria Theresa and Joseph II; Brabant Revolution (1789–1790) briefly creates United Belgian States.
1794–1815	French Republic and Empire	Annexed to France	French Revolutionary armies occupy Belgium. Habsburg rule ends; Belgium incorporated into France until Napoleon’s fall.
1815 onward	Post-Napoleonic Reorganization	United Kingdom of the Netherlands (1815–1830)	Created by the Congress of Vienna; Belgium later gains independence in 1830.

 

 

Timeline: From McMartin to Diddy

Year / Period	Key Event(s)	Significance / Pattern
1983	Judy Johnson reports suspected abuse at McMartin Preschool, Manhattan Beach, CA. The Washington Post+1	The spark: a mother’s claim begins a massive institutional reaction.
1984	Authorities send letter to 200 parents notifying them of investigation, asking children questions. Wikipedia+1	The investigation expands via coercive interviewing, hysteria: “everyone’s a suspect.”
1987	Charges filed against many McMartin staff. Trial begins. Wikipedia+2UMKC School of Law+2	Prosecution attempts legal legitimacy over sensational claims.
1990	All charges dismissed or dropped. No convictions. Wikipedia+2UMKC School of Law+2	Outcome: exhaustive trial, massive public cost, no legal accountability—shows the collapse of moral panic.
1995 (mid-’90s)	Marc Dutroux kidnappings of girls like Julie Lejeune and Mélissa Russo in Belgium. Wikipedia	Begins the regime of Belgian scandal, cover-ups, distrust in justice institutions.
1996	Dutroux arrested August 13. Bodies of girls found in his garden. Wikipedia	The conspiracy narrative intensifies: suspicion of networks, police failure.
2004	Dutroux trial begins March 1. Multiple accomplices tried. Wikipedia	State forced to show face. Many testify.
2004 (June)	Dutroux convicted of murders and sexual abuse; sentenced to life. Wikipedia	Punishment arrives, but the shadows remain.
2005	Epstein case gains public exposure: Florida state charges. CBS News+1	Start of the modern U.S. scandal over sex trafficking elites.
2008	Epstein pleads guilty under a federal-state deal, avoids large federal prosecution. ABC News+1	The famous “sweetheart deal” that immune elites leverage.
2019	Epstein is arrested (July) on federal sex trafficking charges; dies in jail August 10. Yahoo News+1	His death becomes part of the myth: unanswered questions, institutional failure.
2025 (recent)	Sean “Diddy” Combs is convicted of prostitution-related charges. AP News+1	A new test case: entertainment mogul, network of allegedly coercive acts, high stakes in public exposure.

---

Interpretive Threads: What Connects These Cases

1. From Moral Panic to Elite Protection

   • McMartin began as a moral panic about day-care abuse and satanic ritual. The state cast a wide net, interrogated children, and then collapsed.

   • Dutroux was a horror that blew open the possibility of elite complicity. Instead of systemic reform, Belgium offered scapegoats, protocol changes, and institutional deflection.

   • Epstein was a system case: wealthy, connected, yet shielded by legal backchannels. His convictions came late and incompletely.

   • Diddy is in the mold: a high-profile, resourceful figure. The question is whether the system will treat him like a “celebrity exception” or hold him to the same standard as street-level defendants.

2. Visibility Isn’t Safety

   • In McMartin, the accused were visible; yet they were stripped of reputation anyway.

   • In Dutroux, the victims were hidden; vigilantes, whistleblowers, and judges risked their lives to uncover them.

   • Epstein was high-profile and visible; it didn’t prevent institutional betrayal, secrecy, or rushed closure.

   • Diddy is visible, but that visibility may shield him more than expose him.

3. Legal and Procedural Loopholes

   • McMartin’s collapse was tied to methodological flaws—coerced interviews, lack of corroboration, prosecutorial overreach.

   • Dutroux’s case suffered from ignored leads, initial mishandling, delays, and judiciary restrictions (e.g. removal of Connerotte).

   • Epstein’s plea deal exploited gaps between state and federal jurisdictions, non-prosecution agreements, and prosecutorial discretion.

   • Diddy’s case will (or already does) rest on issues of consent, complicity, testimony, statute limitations, and celebrity immunity.

4. The Role of Institutions vs. Individuals

   • In McMartin, the fog of institutions overwhelmed any single truth-teller.

   • In Belgium, institutions themselves became part of the scandal (judiciary, police, local government).

   • In the Epstein case, institutions (FBI, DOJ, prosecutors) handled or mishandled evidence, revealing their own complicity.

   • In Diddy’s case, the entertainment, finance, media, and legal institutions all overlap—and may protect or fracture depending on pressure.

Early 1980s — The Presidio & Military Child-Abuse Allegations

1986–1987:

• At the Presidio Army Base Day-Care Center in San Francisco, parents reported sexual abuse of dozens of children by Army chaplain Gary Hambright and others.

• The case mirrored McMartin: reports of ritual abuse, multiple children involved, and institutional denial.

• Hambright was charged but the case was dismissed because the U.S. Attorney refused to prosecute, citing unreliable child testimony and jurisdictional issues.

• The Army quietly transferred or retired staff; no convictions followed.

• Subsequent reporting (San Jose Mercury News, 1987–1990) uncovered that investigative files were destroyed or sealed during base downsizing.

Pattern established: when allegations touch military or federal property, the response shifts from prosecution to containment and record control.

---

1983–1990 — McMartin Preschool Case (California)

1983:

• Judy Johnson reports suspected sexual abuse at McMartin Preschool in Manhattan Beach.

• 200+ families interviewed; claims balloon into “satanic ritual” panic.
  1984–1990:

• The longest, most expensive trial in U.S. history at that point.

• Every defendant ultimately acquitted or case dropped.

• Johnson dies in 1986, discredited as “unstable.”
  Aftermath:

• Public narrative becomes “mass hysteria,” yet many case materials—including taped child interviews—were sealed or destroyed after the trial.

• Decades later, researchers found incomplete archives; the tapes were “lost” in police evidence purges.

Institutional reflex: redefine systemic risk as moral panic; seal or shred the evidence.

1995–2004 — The Dutroux Affair (Belgium)

1995–1996:

• Children kidnapped and murdered by Marc Dutroux. Discovery of dungeons ignites national outrage.

• Judge Jean-Marc Connerotte, who rescued two survivors, is removed for attending a victims’ fundraiser — seen by the public as proof of high-level obstruction.
  1996:

• The White March: 300,000 Belgians protest corruption and the government’s failure to protect children.
  1997–2004:

• Investigations stall; multiple witnesses and auxiliary figures die under murky circumstances.

• Parliamentary inquiry finds severe police and judicial errors but no proven elite network.
  2004:

• Dutroux convicted; life sentence.

• Afterward, many dossiers are sealed for 30–50 years, effectively preventing external review.

Belgium’s post-Dutroux reforms focused on police procedure, not structural accountability — and by 2022, Belgium legalized prostitution, weakening some of the original “child-protection first” stance.

2005–2019 — Epstein’s Protected Network

2005:

• Palm Beach police open investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors.
  2008:

• Pleads guilty in Florida to solicitation of a minor; receives cushy “work-release” deal orchestrated by U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta.

• Federal case paperwork sealed under a non-prosecution agreement that also protected unnamed co-conspirators.
  2018–2019:

• Miami Herald exposé triggers new federal case; Epstein arrested July 2019, dies Aug. 10.

• Post-death: thousands of pages of deposition records released in fragments; others remain sealed.

• FBI “Vault” uploads show heavy redaction and withheld attachments — classic partial transparency.

• Many co-conspirators (including Ghislaine Maxwell) tried separately, but client list and financial networks largely hidden.

Pattern revived: legal containment through secrecy orders and selective record destruction — a digital version of the shredders used in earlier decades.

2010s–2020s — West Point & Military Archive Fires / Data Loss

2010–2023:

• Multiple independent incidents reported in U.S. military archives (including West Point’s historic data centers and personnel record facilities).

• In 1973, the National Personnel Records Center fire in St. Louis had already destroyed 16–18 million military files; later digital losses were blamed on “mold,” “server failures,” or “renovations.”

• The result: generations of untraceable service records, complicating abuse or misconduct investigations tied to military or intelligence personnel.

Continuity: physical fires, digital purges, and bureaucratic “reclassification” achieve the same end — historical amnesia.

2024–2025 — Diddy and the Entertainment Power Nexus

2023–2025:

• Civil and criminal suits accuse Sean “Diddy” Combs of sexual assault, trafficking, and coercion within his music empire.

• 2024 raids recover hard drives, NDAs, and financial ledgers; several associates flip.

• 2025: criminal proceedings begin; his empire faces collapse.

• Federal investigators note similarities to Epstein-style control systems: gated compounds, private jets, NDAs, digital surveillance.

Cultural echo: the same cycle — wealth, access, secrecy, then exposure — moves from preschools to palaces.

Through-Line: Power, Paper Trails, and Erasure

Pattern	Mechanism	Outcome
State or elite involvement	Military, political, financial, entertainment systems entangled	Creates built-in motive for suppression
Record control	Fires, sealed archives, redactions, NDAs, digital purges	Prevents pattern recognition
Victim discrediting	Labeled unstable, hysterical, conspiratorial	Undermines testimony
Public fatigue	Scandal overload leads to disbelief	Ensures cycle continues

---

Closing Frame

From the Presidio base daycare to West Point’s vanished files, from Dutroux’s sealed archives to Epstein’s redacted ledgers, and now to Diddy’s NDAs, the pattern is constant:
Expose, deny, erase, reframe.
Each generation thinks it’s confronting a new scandal, but it’s the same architecture—just digitized.

 

1980s — McMartin and Presidio: Maximum Outrage, Minimal Convictions

McMartin Preschool (California, 1983–1990)

• Charged:

  • Seven employees, including Peggy McMartin Buckey and Ray Buckey (her son).

• Outcome:

  • No convictions.

  • Two full trials (1987–1990); all charges ultimately dismissed.

  • Jury deadlocked on 52 counts; retrial collapsed.

  • All others had charges dropped before trial.

• Punished:

  • None.

  • After seven years, hundreds of interviews, and $15 million in legal costs, no one went to prison.

• Aftermath:

  • Key witness Judy Johnson (initial reporter) died before trial; investigators discredited.

  • Police and prosecutors faced no sanctions for misconduct or interview coercion.

---

Presidio Army Day Care Scandal (San Francisco, 1986–1987)

• Charged:

  • Gary Hambright, U.S. Army chaplain’s assistant, indicted on eight counts of molestation (December 1987).

• Outcome:

  • Federal prosecutors dismissed all charges within months.

  • No military personnel disciplined or charged afterward.

• Punished:

  • None.

  • Victims’ families received no settlements; the Army cited “lack of credible evidence.”

• Aftermath:

  • Case quietly closed; daycare records sealed or destroyed during Presidio base closure in 1989.

---

1990s–2000s — Dutroux: One Conviction, Systemic Impunity

Marc Dutroux (Belgium, 1995–2004)

• Charged:

  • Marc Dutroux – kidnapping, rape, murder.

  • Michelle Martin (wife) – complicity.

  • Michel Lelièvre (accomplice) – assistance.

  • Michel Nihoul (businessman) – corruption, trafficking.

• Outcome:

  • 2004: Dutroux convicted on all major counts; sentenced to life imprisonment.

  • Martin sentenced to 30 years (released 2012 on parole).

  • Lelièvre sentenced to 25 years (paroled 2019).

  • Nihoul acquitted of trafficking, convicted only of fraud (5 years).

• Punished:

  • Only the lower-tier offenders.

  • No police, judges, or alleged network members prosecuted despite parliamentary inquiry.

• Aftermath:

  • 27 witnesses or peripheral figures died during proceedings—no homicides proven.

  • Investigative judge Connerotte removed; disciplinary action against him, not the obstructers.

---

2000s–2010s — Epstein: Deals, Delay, and a Death

Jeffrey Epstein (U.S., 2005–2019)

• Charged:

  • 2005 – State of Florida: sex offenses involving minors.

  • 2008 – Federal non-prosecution agreement (NPA) covers co-conspirators.

  • 2019 – Federal SDNY indictment for sex trafficking of minors.

• Outcome:

  • 2008 plea → 13 months county jail “work release.”

  • 2019 arrest → dies in custody before trial (ruled suicide).

  • 2021 – Ghislaine Maxwell convicted on five federal counts, sentenced to 20 years.

• Punished:

  • Epstein (briefly, leniently).

  • Maxwell (20 years).

  • None of Epstein’s high-profile clients charged.

• Aftermath:

  • Alex Acosta, U.S. Attorney who approved the NPA, resigned as U.S. Labor Secretary in 2019 – no prosecution.

  • Ongoing civil settlements paid by Epstein estate (~$150 million+ to victims).

---

2020s — Diddy: Pending Cases and Early Fallout

Sean “Diddy” Combs (U.S., 2023–2025)

• Charged:

  • 2024 – Federal grand jury indictments alleging sex trafficking, racketeering, coercion, and obstruction.

  • 2025 – Additional civil suits consolidated in SDNY.

• Outcome (as of 2025):

  • Ongoing: multiple civil settlements reportedly in negotiation.

  • Federal criminal trial pending; assets frozen.

• Punished:

  • None yet legally convicted.

  • Several associates cooperating; a few charged with perjury and witness intimidation.

• Aftermath:

  • Corporate entities (Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Global) under federal receivership; endorsement contracts terminated.

Cross-Case Summary: Who Was Actually Punished

Case	Year(s)	Defendants	Convicted / Sentenced	Notes
McMartin	1983–1990	7 charged	0	All acquitted / dropped
Presidio	1986–1987	1 charged	0	Federal dismissal
Dutroux	1995–2004	4 charged	3	Only core group punished
Epstein	2005–2021	2 charged (Epstein, Maxwell)	2	Epstein lenient; Maxwell 20 yrs
Diddy	2023–2025	1 + associates	0 (pending)	Ongoing federal case

---

Meta-Pattern: Exposure Without Systemic Penalty

Stage	McMartin	Presidio	Dutroux	Epstein	Diddy
Initial outrage	???? Public hysteria	⚠️ Military secrecy	⚡ Mass protests	???? Global media	???? Social media storm
Institutional control	Prosecutors collapse case	Army invokes jurisdiction	Judge removed	NPA deal / sealed docs	NDAs / settlement attempts
Accountability	None	None	One perpetrator	Two scapegoats	TBD
Record fate	Destroyed/Sealed	Destroyed	Sealed 30–50 yrs	Redacted FBI files	Digital evidence under seal

---

In 40 years, only four principal perpetrators (Dutroux, Martin, Lelièvre, Maxwell) have served substantial time, despite hundreds of victims and institutional ties in all five scandals.