loader from loading.io

Ep. 236: JD Vance, 60 Minutes, the Associated Press, the FCC, and more

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

Release Date: 02/19/2025

Ep. 253: Pam Bondi says hate speech is not free speech — is she right? show art Ep. 253: Pam Bondi says hate speech is not free speech — is she right?

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

FIRE staff also take your questions on Charlie Kirk's assassination, President Trump's lawsuit against The New York Times, cancel culture, and more. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 01:42 Attorney General Pam Bondi's comments that "hate speech" is distinct from "free speech" 02:23 Is it OK for the Department of Justice to target people for "hate speech"? 05:42 How have “hate speech” laws played out overseas? 07:19 President Trump's response to Pam Bondi's “hate speech” remarks 08:50 Are “fighting words,” “incitement,” and “true threats” free speech? 11:22 What about doxxing? 15:15...

info_outline
Ep. 252: America’s first free speech crisis — the Sedition Act of 1798 show art Ep. 252: America’s first free speech crisis — the Sedition Act of 1798

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

We’re joined by award-winning author, , to discuss his book, .  Slack focuses on the infamous , which sparked the first major controversy over freedom of speech in America. Timestamps:  00:00 Intro (including note about Charlie Kirk) 03:59 Book origins 12:05 What were the Alien and Sedition Acts? 16:00 Prosecutions under the Act and their free speech implications 25:35 Free speech during the Revolutionary era 28:14 Adams’ perspective on the Sedition Act 46:02 Was Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase a partisan hack? 53:57 Sedition Act fallout 01:01:02 Outro Enjoy listening to the...

info_outline
Ep. 251: Free speech and ‘the executive power’ with Advisory Opinions show art Ep. 251: Free speech and ‘the executive power’ with Advisory Opinions

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

What are the limits of presidential power? How many days has it been since President Trump’s TikTok ban moratorium went into place? What is the state of the conservative legal movement? And where did former FIRE president go on his first date? French and of the popular legal podcast “” join the show to answer these questions and discuss the few free speech issues where they disagree with FIRE. Timestamps:  00:00 Intro 02:18 Origin story of “Advisory Opinions” 08:15 Disagreements between FIRE and AO 15:04 Why FIRE doesn’t editorialize on the content of speech 24:27 Limits of...

info_outline
Ep. 250: Civil rights, hate speech, and the First Amendment show art Ep. 250: Civil rights, hate speech, and the First Amendment

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

We know the First Amendment protects hate speech. But has it always done so? And how have civil rights groups responded when their members are the target of hate speech? University of Iowa Law Professor Samantha Barbas is the author of a new law review article, “.” Timestamps:  00:00 Intro 04:04 “The Birth of a Nation” movie controversy 12:44 Henry Ford’s anti-Semitic “Dearborn Independent” 22:41 American Jewish Committee’s “quarantining” solution 28:41 ACLU’s Eleanor Holmes Norton defending a racist in court 33:42 Racist Senate candidate J.B. Stoner 37:28 Neo-Nazis...

info_outline
Ep. 249: FIRE Reacts — Where does Harvard go from here? With Larry Summers show art Ep. 249: FIRE Reacts — Where does Harvard go from here? With Larry Summers

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

2025 has not been kind to Harvard. To date, the Trump administration , demanding violations of free speech, academic freedom, and institutional autonomy in return for restoring the funding. In response, Harvard , raising First Amendment claims.  Helping us unpack all things Harvard are: , President Emeritus, professor (Harvard) & advisory council member (FIRE) , President & CEO (FIRE) Timestamps:  00:00 Intro 02:32 Harvard’s disputes with the Trump administration 08:29 The need for internal reforms at Harvard 42:50 Institutional neutrality debate 46:16 IHRA definition...

info_outline
Ep. 248: Commercial speech and the First Amendment show art Ep. 248: Commercial speech and the First Amendment

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

Imagine the government forcing you to label your all-natural milk product as “imitation.”  Florida tried to make one dairy farm do just that, sparking a First Amendment question: Where’s the line between a business’s right to speak and protecting consumers from deception? In this episode, we explore how far free speech protections go for commercial speech with: , managing attorney (Institute for Justice) , chief counsel (FIRE) , Thomas M. Siebel senior fellow (Hoover Institution, Stanford) Timestamps:  00:00 Intro 05:03 What exactly is commercial speech? 08:25 The...

info_outline
Ep. 247: Justin Amash show art Ep. 247: Justin Amash

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

Throughout his career, former Congressman has been a strong advocate for freedom of speech, writing that “The value of free speech comes from encountering views that are unorthodox, uncommon, or unaccepted…Free speech is a barren concept if people are limited to expressing views already widely held.” In this special live episode, filmed in front of 200+ high schoolers attending FIRE’s Free Speech Forum at American University in Washington, D.C., Amash takes questions from the audience and discusses his upbringing, his political career, the state of American politics, and how the...

info_outline
Ep. 246: Tech check — AI moratorium, Character AI lawsuit, FTC, Digital Services Act, and FSC v. Paxton show art Ep. 246: Tech check — AI moratorium, Character AI lawsuit, FTC, Digital Services Act, and FSC v. Paxton

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

We’re checking in on the latest news in tech and free speech. We cover the state AI regulation moratorium that failed in Congress, the ongoing Character A.I. lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission’s consent decree with Omnicom and Interpublic Group, the European Union’s Digital Services Act, and what comes next after the Supreme Court’s Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton decision. Guests: — lead counsel for tech policy, FIRE — internet policy counsel, TechFreedom Timestamps:  00:00 Intro 02:38 State AI regulation moratorium fails in Congress 20:04 Character AI lawsuit 41:10 FTC,...

info_outline
Ep. 245: The Supreme Court's decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton show art Ep. 245: The Supreme Court's decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

FIRE staff responds to the Court's decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton that addresses a Texas law requiring age verification for accessing certain sexual material online. Joining us:  — Legal director  — Chief counsel — General counsel Timestamps: 01:21 How the case wound up at the Supreme Court 06:57 Bob’s experience with arguing strict scrutiny in the courts 09:32 Ronnie’s perspective on the ruling 10:22 Brick + mortar stores vs. online sites 12:07 Has the Court established a new category of partially protected speech? 13:36 What speech is still subject to strict...

info_outline
Ep. 244: Censoring lawmakers, T-shirts, and seashells show art Ep. 244: Censoring lawmakers, T-shirts, and seashells

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

We discuss the Supreme Court backing Maine lawmaker Laurel Libby, NPR filing suit against Trump, a years-long dispute over a student wearing a “there are only two genders” shirt, the Secret Service investigation into James Comey, the latest on Harvard vs. Trump, and more. Guests: — chief counsel, FIRE — former senior counsel, Ballard Spahr Timestamps:  00:00 Intro 03:34 Censure of Rep. Libby 07:02 Supreme Court shadow docket 13:53 NPR lawsuit against Trump admin 19:07 Differences between NPR and Voice of America cases 30:50 Middle school student wearing “there are only two...

info_outline
 
More Episodes

From JD Vance’s free speech critique of Europe to the Trump administration barring the Associated Press from the Oval Office, free speech news is buzzing. General Counsel Ronnie London and Chief Counsel Bob Corn-Revere unpack the latest developments. 

Timestamps: 

00:00 Intro

01:49 JD Vance’s speech in Europe

13:27 Margaret Brennan’s comment on the Holocaust

15:13 Weimar fallacy

17:36 Trump admin v. Associated Press

21:33 DEI executive order

27:39 Trump’s lawsuits targeting the media

28:54 FIRE defending Iowa pollster Ann Selzer

32:29 Concerns about the FCC under Brendan Carr

44:09 2004 Super Bowl and the FCC

46:25 FCC’s history of using the “Section 230 threat”

49:14 Newsguard and the FCC

54:48 Elon Musk and doxxing

59:44 Foreigners and the First Amendment

01:05:19 Outro

Read the transcript here.

Enjoy listening to our podcast? Donate to FIRE today and get exclusive content like member webinars, special episodes, and more. If you became a FIRE Member through a donation to FIRE at thefire.org and would like access to Substack’s paid subscriber podcast feed, please email [email protected].

Show notes:

- “Vice President JD Vance delivers remarks at the Munich Security Conference” The White House (2025)

- “Utterly bizarre assertion from Margaret Brennan…” Michael Tracey via X (2025)

- “Rubio defends Vance's Munich speech as CBS host suggests 'free speech' caused the Holocaust” FOX News (2025)

- “Posting hateful speech online could lead to police raiding your home in this European country” 60 Minutes (2025)

- “AP reporter and photographer barred from Air Force One over ‘Gulf of Mexico’ terminology dispute” AP News (2025)

- “FIRE statement on White House denying AP Oval Office access” FIRE (2025)

- “Ending radical and wasteful government DEI programs and preferencing” The White House (2025)

- “Meta to pay $25 million to settle 2021 Trump lawsuit” The Wall Street Journal (2025)

- “Trump settles suit against Elon Musk’s X over his post-Jan. 6 ban” AP News (2025)

- “Questions ABC News should answer following the $16 million Trump settlement” Columbia Journalism Review (2025)

- “Trump v. Selzer: Donald Trump sues pollster J. Ann Selzer for ‘consumer fraud’ over Iowa poll” FIRE (2025)

- “A plea for institutional modesty” Bob Corn-Revere (2025)

- “Telecommunications Act” FCC (1996)

- Section 230 (1993)

- “CBS News submits records of Kamala Harris' '60 Minutes' spot to FCC amid distortion probe” USA Today (2025)

- “Complaints against various television licensees concerning their February 1, 2004 broadcast of the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show” FCC (2004)

- “Brendan Carr’s letter to Big Tech CEOs” Brendan Carr via the FCC (2024)

- “NRA v. Vullo” (2023)

- “She should be fired immediately” Elon Musk via X (2025)

- “Restoring freedom of speech and ending federal censorship” The White House (2025)

- “Protecting the United States from foreign terrorists and other national security and public safety threats” The White House (2025)