Ep. 241: The government’s money, the government’s rules?
So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
Release Date: 04/23/2025
So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
Our guests today signed onto a statement by a group of 18 law professors who opposed the Trump administration’s funding threats at Columbia on free speech and academic freedom grounds. Since then, Northwestern, Cornell, Princeton, Harvard, and nearly 60 other colleges and universities are under investigation with their funding hanging in the balance, allegedly for violations of civil rights law. To help us understand the funding threats, Harvard’s recent lawsuit against the federal government, and where universities go from here are: - — distinguished teaching professor at...
info_outlineSo to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
We travel from America to Europe, Russia, China, and more places to answer the question: Is there a global free speech recession? Guests: - : FIRE senior scholar, global expression - : FIRE senior fellow - : FIRE senior fellow Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 03:52 Free speech global surveys 07:49 Freedom of expression deteriorating 11:43 Misinformation and disinformation 18:05 Russian state-sponsored media 24:55 Europe’s Digital Services Act 29:26 Chinese censorship 34:33 Radio Free Europe 54:57 Mohammad cartoons 01:04:14 Outro Enjoy listening to the podcast? and get exclusive content...
info_outlineSo to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
We explore how censorship is impacting institutions — from universities to law firms to the Maine House of Representatives. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 01:40 Federal government cuts Columbia’s funding 16:57 Updates on the Mahmoud Khalil case 27:01 Ed Martin’s Georgetown letter 34:59 Trump targeting law firms 55:01 Maine House censure of Rep. Laurel Libby 01:03:37 Outro Guests: - , FIRE’s legal director - , FIRE’s supervising senior attorney - , FIRE’s director of campus rights advocacy Enjoy listening to the podcast? and get exclusive content like member webinars, special...
info_outlineSo to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
First Amendment lawyer and immigration lawyer join the show to discuss the arrest, detention, and possible deportation of green card holder Mahmoud Khalil. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 00:53 Latest updates on Khalil 02:51 First Amendment implications 06:08 Legal perspectives on deportation 11:54 Chilling effects on free expression 21:06 Constitutional rights for non-citizens 24:03 The intersection of free speech and immigration law 27:02 Broader implication of immigration policies 37:51 Outro Enjoy listening to the podcast? and get exclusive content like member webinars, special...
info_outlineSo to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
Does a cat stand on two legs or four? The answer to that question may tell you all you need to know about the government involving itself in social media content moderation. On today’s show, we cover the latest tech policy developments involving the Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission, AI regulation, and more. Guests: , FIRE’s lead counsel, tech policy. , a resident technology and innovation senior fellow at the R Street Institute - , a technology policy senior fellow at the CATO Institute Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 01:30 Section 230 06:55...
info_outlineSo to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
From JD Vance’s free speech critique of Europe to the Trump administration barring the Associated Press from the Oval Office, free speech news is buzzing. General Counsel Ronnie London and Chief Counsel Bob Corn-Revere unpack the latest developments. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 01:49 JD Vance’s speech in Europe 13:27 Margaret Brennan’s comment on the Holocaust 15:13 Weimar fallacy 17:36 Trump admin v. Associated Press 21:33 DEI executive order 27:39 Trump’s lawsuits targeting the media 28:54 FIRE defending Iowa pollster Ann Selzer 32:29 Concerns about the FCC under Brendan Carr...
info_outlineSo to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
Over the years, elite institutions shifted from fostering open debate to enforcing ideological conformity. But as guest Ilya Shapiro puts it, “the pendulum is swinging back.” He shares his firsthand experience with cancel culture and how the American Bar Association’s policies influence legal education. Shapiro also opines on major free speech cases before the Supreme Court, including the TikTok ownership battle and Texas’ age verification law for adult content. Shapiro is a senior fellow and director of constitutional studies at the Manhattan Institute. He previously (and briefly)...
info_outlineSo to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
The University of Chicago is known for its commitment to free speech and academic freedom. Why are these values important to the university? Where do they originate? And how do they help administrators navigate conflicts and controversies? Tony Banout and Tom Ginsburg direct the University of Chicago’s , which last year. They are also editors of “,” a new book that collects foundational texts that inform the university’s free speech tradition. Enjoy listening to our podcast? and get exclusive content like member webinars, special episodes, and more. If you became a through a...
info_outlineSo to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
Is the free speech conversation too simplistic? Peter Ives thinks so. He is the author of “,” a new book that seeks to provide a more nuanced analysis of the free speech debate within various domains, from government to campus to social media. Ives is a professor of political science at the University of Winnipeg. He researches and writes on the politics of “global English," bridging the disciplines of language policy, political theory, and the influential ideas of Antonio Gramsci. Enjoying our podcast? and get exclusive content like member webinars, special episodes, and more. If...
info_outlineSo to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast
FIRE staffers take your questions on the TikTok ban, mandatory DEI statements, the Kids Online Safety Act, Trump vs. the media, and more. Joining us: Ari Cohn, lead counsel for tech policy Robert Shibley, special counsel for campus advocacy Will Creeley, legal director This webinar was open to the public. Future monthly FIRE Member Webinars will not be. Become a to receive invitations to future live webinars. If you became a through a donation to FIRE at and would like access to Substack’s paid subscriber podcast feed, please...
info_outlineOur guests today signed onto a statement by a group of 18 law professors who opposed the Trump administration’s funding threats at Columbia on free speech and academic freedom grounds.
Since then, Northwestern, Cornell, Princeton, Harvard, and nearly 60 other colleges and universities are under investigation with their funding hanging in the balance, allegedly for violations of civil rights law.
To help us understand the funding threats, Harvard’s recent lawsuit against the federal government, and where universities go from here are:
- David Rabban — distinguished teaching professor at The University of Texas at Austin School of Law
- Erwin Chemerinsky — distinguished professor of law and dean at UC Berkeley Law
Timestamps:
00:00 Intro
02:50 Govt’s approach with Harvard and Columbia
05:39 Title VI violations
11:30 Anti-Semitism on campuses
23:02 Viewpoint diversity in higher education
27:12 Affirmative action and the Supreme Court
35:52 Title IX under the Obama and Biden administrations
42:32 Bob Jones University and tax-exempt status
45:53 Future of federal funding in higher education
54:08 Outro
Enjoy listening to the podcast? Donate to FIRE today and get exclusive content like member webinars, special episodes, and more. If you became a FIRE Member through a donation to FIRE at thefire.org and would like access to Substack’s paid subscriber podcast feed, please email [email protected].
Show notes:
-
Academic freedom: from professional norm to first amendment right David Rabban (2024)
-
Worse than nothing: the dangerous fallacy of originalism Erwin Chemerinsky (2022)
-
“A statement from constitutional law scholars on Columbia” The New York Review (2025)
-
Sweezy v. New Hampshire (1957)
-
“The promise of American higher education” Alan Garber (2025)
-
“Columbia agrees to Trump’s demands after federal funds are stripped” The New York Times (2025)
-
“Sustaining Columbia’s vital mission” Claire Shipman (2025)
-
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (2023)
-
“What is Title IX? Its history & implications” FIRE (2025)
-
Bridges v. Wixon (1945)