February 9, 2026 Fredrik Hasselavist, William Griffith, John Ruskin, The Gardener's Year by Karel Capek, and Henry Arthur Bright

Subscribe

Apple | Google | Spotify | Stitcher | iHeart

Support The Daily Gardener

Patreon

Buy Me A Coffee

Connect for FREE!

The Friday Newsletter |  Daily Gardener Community

Today’s Show Notes

February is often described as the month of celebrating love. But in garden history, love rarely announces itself.

It shows up in persistence. In choices that cost something. In what people are willing to give their lives to — and what they are willing to live alongside, day after day.

Today’s Garden History

1752 Fredrik Hasselqvist died in Smyrna, a Mediterranean port city.

Fredrik was one of Carl Linnaeus’s students — one of the young men Linnaeus affectionately called his apostles. Linnaeus sent them into the world to observe, to collect, and to extend human knowledge of the natural order.

Fredrik was not an ideal candidate.

He was brilliant and modest, but frequently ill and perpetually short of money. There were delays. Setbacks. Long stretches when his body would not cooperate.

Linnaeus urged him not to go. But Fredrik would not be dissuaded. This was what he had always wanted to do.

So he went — not triumphantly, but determined — traveling through Egypt, Palestine, and Syria, collecting plants when he could, writing whenever he had the strength.

His work came in fits and starts. There were gaps and hardships. Still, he kept going.

In the end, his health failed, just as Linnaeus had feared. Fredrik was only thirty when he died — his body spent long before his curiosity was.

But his specimens made it home. His notes endured.

Linnaeus remembered him as an apostle — sent into the world to serve science, and consumed by the calling.

It was devotion, without guarantees.

1845 William Griffith died in Malacca, in what is now Malaysia.

William was just thirty-four years old.

Unlike Fredrik, William was the real thing. He lived at a time when botany desperately needed information — from places few Europeans had seen, from climates that challenged every assumption.

And William delivered.

Trained as a physician, he distinguished himself early through precision and discipline. He liked naming plants, but what truly absorbed him was understanding how they worked — structure, reproduction, order.

His observations were meticulous. His output astonishing.

He traveled widely across India, Burma, the Himalayas, Bhutan, and Afghanistan — bringing back exactly what the field needed at the time.

Those who knew him believed he was destined for greatness.

So it was no surprise when William was chosen to oversee the Calcutta Botanical Garden after its longtime director, Nathaniel Wallich, was forced to leave for medical treatment.

Wallich’s garden was mature, atmospheric, and deeply beautiful — shaped over the course of decades. But William couldn’t see the order through all that beauty. It distracted him.

To William, a botanical garden existed to teach, and teaching required clarity. Plant A beside Plant B. If they belonged together on the page, the garden should be organized the same way.

While Wallich was away, William went to work.

He excavated and removed not just individual plantings, but rows of majestic trees that had stood like sentries since the garden’s earliest days.

William wasn’t trying to be malicious. But he was a purist — a man built for the field, placed in charge of curation and care.

When Wallich returned in 1844, he wrote to his friend William Hooker:

“Where is the stately, matchless garden that I left in 1842?

Is this the same as that? Can it be?

No — no — no!

Day is not more different from night than the state of the garden as it was from its present utterly ruined condition…

My heart bleeds at what I am compelled daily — hourly — to witness.”

By then, the damage was done.

Wallich was given back what remained of his garden. William was reassigned.

He left with his wife, Emily — a striking detail in a world where plant hunters usually worked alone.

His scientific brilliance did not desert him. But he was not a garden designer.

His hepatitis flared as soon as he boarded the ship. He died ten days after landing.

Unearthed Words

In today’s Unearthed Words, we hear from John Ruskin, who understood this tension instinctively.

He wrote:

“The greatest thing a human soul ever does in this world is to see something, and tell what it saw in a plain way.”

Not to improve it. Not to rearrange it. Not to force it into meaning.

Just to see what it is. And say it honestly.

Gardeners know this instinct.

It’s the moment you stop arguing with the season. Stop correcting the soil. Stop asking the plant to be something else.

And allow the garden to be exactly what it is.

Book Recommendation

The Gardener’s Year by Karel Čapek

Čapek didn’t set out to write a classic. He simply recorded a year in his garden — the plans, the miscalculations, the waiting.

What made the book beloved was its recognition that control is never complete, and that the real work lies in learning when to act and when to let things unfold.

It makes room for failure without making it feel like defeat.

It’s a snapshot — but one gardeners keep returning to.

Botanic Spark

And finally, here's something sweet to ignite the little botanic spark in your heart.

1830 Henry Arthur Bright was born.

A son of the port city of Liverpool, Henry became a writer known for warmth and charm. He was a generous correspondent, a sympathetic ear, and a steady presence in literary circles.

He befriended writers on both sides of the Atlantic, including Nathaniel Hawthorne, whom he met in Concord in 1852. They traveled together and remained friends for life.

When Henry wasn’t writing, he tended his garden at his home, Ashfield, on the outskirts of the city.

Almost without meaning to, he began recording his life through the small things that happened there — the pleasures, the disappointments, the steady labor, what thrived, what failed, what surprised him.

Over time, these moments became quiet meditations, written with such ease and honesty that gardeners began to recognize themselves in his pages.

Henry developed strong preferences.

He loved thick plantings. Old flowers. Snowdrops that wandered where they pleased.

He disliked fashion and surface display. He trusted soil, sun, and time.

His most beloved book is called A Year in a Lancashire Garden. But when a gardener reads it, it feels like a lifetime.

Final Thoughts

As we close the show today, remember: garden history is made not just by plants, but by people — with all their strengths and missteps.

People just like us.

And that’s why these stories still guide us — because how they loved gardens still shapes how we try to live with ours.

Thanks for listening to The Daily Gardener.
And remember, for a happy, healthy life, garden every day.