Last Branch Standing - Honey Badger References and Case Analysis

Last Branch Standing: A Potentially Surprising, Occasionally Witty Journey Inside Today's Supreme Court

By: Sarah Isgur
Published: 2026
416 Pages

Briefly, what is this book about?

A deep dive into the Roberts Court, with a historical framing of the Court as a whole. Two main themes run through the book. 

First, while people want to evaluate the Court on the single axis of liberal vs. conservative, there is a second, perhaps more important axis that tracks the institutionalism of the justices—respect for precedent, maintaining the legitimacy of the Court, congressional deference, etc. Once you consider both axes, rather than a 6–3, Republican vs. Democratic Court, you get a 3–3–3 Court. Composed of (in Isgur’s words):

1- The Deciders: Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett
2- The Conservative Honey Badgers: Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch
3- The Lonely Liberals: Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson

Second, there’s the idea of the Supreme Court as the Last Branch Standing, by which she means that it’s the only branch of government that would be recognizable to the Founders. Which also means it’s the one branch of government trying to hold a constitutional line. This is not a comment on Originalism or Textualism, this is a comment on the fact that the executive Branch has accumulated an enormous amount of power, while, conversely, the legislative branch does barely any legislation. As a consequence, much of what the Court does is designed as subtle encouragement for Congress to take back some of its power.

What authorial biases should I be aware of?