Ethical Decision-Making Models in Supervision

Episode 9: Ethical Decision-Making Models in Supervision – Show Notes

Supervisors often face complex ethical dilemmas, and having a structured framework can make all the difference. In this episode of Supervising with Purpose, we explore ethical decision-making models that provide guidance in navigating gray areas with confidence.

From Reamer’s model and Kitchener’s five ethical principles to the ACA’s ethical decision-making process, we’ll discuss how these frameworks help supervisors ensure consistency, transparency, and accountability in their practice. Learn how to apply these models in real-world supervision scenarios, promote ethical awareness among supervisees, and integrate decision-making frameworks into daily practice.

Need Tools and Resources for Supervisors?

Looking for practical tools, support, or community? Check out:
✅ Supervision Monthly Group – Join a monthly consultation space with other clinically licensed professionals to discuss cases, challenges, and professional growth.
✅ Supervision Resource Hub – Access templates, training guides, and practical tools for effective supervision.

Support the Podcast:

If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and share it with your colleagues. Don’t forget to leave a review—it helps grow the community and reach more supervisors seeking guidance.

Connect with Me:

📲 Instagram: @motivatedwellnesssolutionsllc
🌐 Website: www.motivatedwellnesssolutionsllc.com

Looking for More Guidance?

Subscribe to Supervising with Purpose for actionable insights on clinical supervision, mental health leadership, and building your supervisory skills. Whether you’re starting out or looking to grow, this podcast is packed with tools for your journey.

Disclaimer:

Supervising with Purpose is for informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical, legal, or clinical supervision advice. Always consult with a licensed professional or advisor for personalized guidance.

 

------ Transcript ------

Welcome to Supervising with Purpose: Mental Health Leadership Unlocked. I'm Amy, your guide to navigating the world of clinical supervision and mental health leadership. Whether you're a seasoned supervisor or just stepping into the role, this podcast is here to equip you with insights, tools, and strategies to lead with confidence, clarity, and purpose.

Let's dive into today's episode and unlock the potential of effective supervision. Today we're focusing on ethical decision-making models, essential tools for supervisors navigating complex situations. As supervisors, we're often faced with gray areas where the right course of action isn’t always immediately clear.

This is where ethical decision-making models come into play. These frameworks provide a structured way to analyze dilemmas, consider all factors, and arrive at the most ethical course of action. They help ensure consistency in decision-making, promote transparency, and support accountability. They also provide a foundation for discussing ethical dilemmas with supervisees, which is key to their professional growth.

Let’s explore some of the most widely recognized ethical decision-making models that supervisors can use.

The Reamer Model, developed by Frederick Reamer, emphasizes identifying the ethical issue, examining relevant guidelines, and exploring potential consequences. For example, if a supervisee is struggling with whether to breach confidentiality for a client at risk of harm, this model helps analyze ethical guidelines, legal mandates, and potential outcomes.

Kitchener’s Five Ethical Principles Model is based on five core principles: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and fidelity. Supervisors can use these principles to weigh competing priorities in ethical decisions, such as balancing a supervisee’s autonomy with their responsibility to ensure client safety.

The Ethical Decision-Making Process Model, outlined by the American Counseling Association (ACA), involves identifying the problem, considering ethical standards, consulting with others, generating solutions, evaluating options, and implementing the decision. If a supervisee feels conflicted about dual roles with a client, this process helps guide them in exploring options and reaching a resolution.

Each of these models provides a step-by-step approach to help supervisors consider all aspects of an ethical dilemma. Now, let’s explore some real-world applications of these models.

A supervisee accidentally discloses identifying information about a client during a team meeting. Using the Reamer Model, the supervisor could identify the breach as an ethical issue, examine confidentiality guidelines and relevant laws, consider consequences for the client, supervisee, and agency, and develop a plan to address the breach, including an apology to the client and additional confidentiality training for the team.

A supervisee expresses discomfort working with clients from a particular cultural background due to personal biases. Using Kitchener’s Five Principles, the supervisor could emphasize justice—fair treatment for all clients—and fidelity—commitment to ethical practice. They could acknowledge the supervisee’s autonomy while reinforcing their responsibility to provide unbiased care and develop a professional development plan for cultural competence training.

A supervisee is asked to provide therapy to a friend or family member. Using the Ethical Decision-Making Process Model, the supervisor could help the supervisee identify the dual role as a potential ethical conflict, consult ethical guidelines, consider the impact on both the client and the supervisee, brainstorm solutions such as referring the client to another clinician, and support the supervisee in communicating their decision effectively.

These case studies demonstrate how decision-making models provide clarity and structure when navigating ethical dilemmas.

Start with educating your supervisees. Introduce ethical decision-making models in supervision and discuss their real-world applications. Use hypothetical dilemmas or past cases to build familiarity with applying decision-making frameworks. Encourage consultation by modeling the importance of seeking guidance from peers, mentors, or professional boards when ethical challenges arise. Keep records of ethical decisions, including the steps taken and reasoning behind them, to promote transparency and accountability. After resolving an ethical dilemma, review the process with your supervisee and discuss what worked well and what could be improved for future situations.

Using ethical decision-making models isn’t just about resolving dilemmas—it’s about teaching supervisees how to navigate ethical challenges with confidence and professionalism. These frameworks also hold supervisors accountable for making well-reasoned ethical decisions.

Let’s recap today’s discussion. Ethical decision-making models provide structure and clarity for navigating dilemmas. Common frameworks include Reamer’s Model, Kitchener’s Five Principles, and the ACA’s Ethical Decision-Making Process. Case studies illustrate how these models can be applied in supervision. Practical tips include educating supervisees, practicing regularly, and documenting decisions.

Take a moment to reflect. How often do you use an ethical decision-making model in supervision? Are there opportunities to integrate these frameworks more intentionally?

I’d love to hear your thoughts. Share your favorite ethical decision-making model and how you use it in supervision. Use the hashtag #SupervisionUnplugged or reach out to me directly.

Thank you for joining me on Supervising with Purpose: Mental Health Leadership Unlocked. I hope today’s conversation inspired new ideas and gave you tools to lead with intention.

If you enjoyed this episode, don’t forget to subscribe, share it with your colleagues, and leave a review. It really helps grow the community.

For more tips, tools, and resources, check the show notes. Until next time, keep leading with purpose.