Ep 29: Art and Subsidization; Who's Paying the Piper? Part 2
Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
Release Date: 02/01/2016
Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
Welcome one and all to Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary with The Philosophical Chain Gang ...
info_outline April 1st "Special"Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
so yeah it's april 1st... enjoy! also more sweary than usual so yeah...
info_outline Ep 32: Popular Tragedy; Do Celebrities Ever Really Die?Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
Welcome one and all to Professor Metal’s Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary with the Philosophical Chain Gang ...
info_outline Ep 31: Aesthetics of Despair; What's Good About Feeling Bad?Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
Welcome one and all to Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary with the Philosophical Chain Gang ...
info_outline Ep 30: Misinformation in the Information Age; Are You Caught in a World Wide Web of Lies?Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
...
info_outline The 1st Anniversary SpecialProfessor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
...
info_outline Ep 29: Art and Subsidization; Who's Paying the Piper? Part 2Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
...
info_outline Ep 28: Art and Subsidization; Who Is Paying the Piper?Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
Sean talks about the development of using municipal art projects to stimulate the local art scene ...
info_outline Ep 27: Nuclear Power and the Environment; What Can Green Do For You?Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
Welcome one and all to Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary with the Philosophical Chain Gang ...
info_outline Ep 26: HP Lovecraft and Epistemology; What Shouldn't We Know About Knowing?Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary
...
info_outline
Welcome one and all to Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary with The Philosophical Chain Gang
Today's Episode is Art and Subsidization: Who is paying the Piper? Episode 2
Sean and Ryver talk about the possible consequences of over-saturation of art funding
Bruce and Sean discuss how this relates to the subjective value of art
The Philosophers examine the idea of art that is not appreciated during the time or life of the author
Sean and Ryver talk about the category of movies known as “Cult Classics”
Bruce explains the idea of how a movie is determined to be successful
Ryver talks about the difference in standards amongst movie directors
Sean discusses how we approach movies as both an entertainment medium and art form
Bruce proposes an issue with the distinction between entertainment and art
Ryver addresses the issues concerning these categories
Sean interjects that there are also dark sides to the art community
Ryver expands on art dealership as an example of this dark side
Sean and Ryver discuss the paintings of dubious provenance stemming from World War II
The Philosophers talk about the use of art as a way to make large sums of money whilst doing no actual creation of content
Ryver and Bruce address the associated value of media such as music or movies, specifically as relates to piracy
The Philosophers bring up artists that literally create their own money, such an Banksy and Emperor Norton
Sean transitions into a discussion of how the digital revolution has effected art world
Bruce talks about how the value becomes what appreciation of the art is worth when there is no physical medium
Ryver expands on this by discussing the role of crowd-funding plays as a replacement for the historical system of patronage
Sean explains why and how Patreon makes it possible for artists to be supported for whom systems such as hermitage would not work particularly well for
Ryver explains what Data-moshing is, and how this relates to what is called remix culture
Sean expands on this to explain glitch art
Bruce and Sean talk about how this is both similar to and distinct from physical art media
Ryver goes on to discuss how a similar model to crowd-funding is used in creation, both in remix culture and in more traditional art media
Sean questions whether or not the artist involved in remix culture are themselves creating the art or, if monetary gain is to be made, if it should be made by the original artists
The Philosophers discuss this question as an examination of how one could divide up these things, and whether or not some societies that have rules in place concerning this have handled it well
Sean brings up a slightly more old-school way of taking someone's art and making it your own: Forgery
Bruce posits that there is no money going to the original artist at that point, and that it largely does not matter if the value of the art is appreciation of the piece of art in questions
Ryver counters with the idea that the value of the art itself stems from the authenticity of the piece as much as the piece itself
Sean takes the last word to discuss funding projects that we feel are important to the world, such as Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary with The Philosophical Chain Gang, and how this funding can help each of us improve our lives as both intellectual and emotional beings. He also discusses the benefits of art to share experiences, such as what the artist has experienced that the viewer may wish to understand without needing to actually experience them, such as the horrors of war.
And as always please give us your honest review on iTunes and Stitcher. It helps us make the show better with every one we get to read.
Help keep the show going and the moon safe by supporting us on Patreon
https://patreon.com/Philosophy
Help keep us from disappearing by engaging us on the social media platform of your choice:
http://www.philosophicalchaingang.com
http://www.reddit.com/r/professormetal
http://www.twitter.com/PChainGang
https://www.facebook.com/PChainGang
https://www.pinterest.com/PChainGang/