497 Pinks & Blues: From Sample to Solution

 A controller and a handheld meter give you different readings. Before you adjust blowdown or chemical feed, how do you determine which result deserves your confidence? Reliable water treatment testing starts with understanding the sample, the system, and the equipment behind the number. 

In Episode 497, “Pinks and Blues: From Sample to Solution,” Trace Blackmore, CWT, answers listener questions that build on Episodes 397 and 408. He connects testing with repeatable procedures so technicians can interpret results, make informed adjustments, and explain their decisions to customers. 

Collect water that represents the system 

A correctly performed test cannot compensate for the wrong sample. Trace explains how stagnant water in long sample lines can misrepresent the system you intend to evaluate. Instead of assuming a quick rinse is enough, verify flushing at the sample station against water collected at the source. Record the sample location, collection time, source, and operating conditions so the next technician can understand what you tested. 

Define normal and examine the trend 

A baseline includes more than a conductivity target. Makeup water quality, equipment, treatment feed, control ranges, water usage, operating changes, and historical problems all help establish what a healthy account looks like. Then compare today’s result with previous readings. Ask whether the pattern is stable, improving, or worsening, and what operational change could explain it. 

Verify instruments before changing the program 

Clean glassware, properly stored reagents, maintained probes, and calibration checks support confidence in your results. Trace describes using a known standard to investigate disagreement between a handheld meter and a controller. He also challenges a universal calibration schedule: verify how your own meter performs. Once a result is confirmed, examine related tests and system conditions before deciding on an adjustment. 

Explain the findings and the next steps 

A useful service report records observations, data, interpretation, actions, verification, and ownership. Explain what needs attention, who will address it, and how the correction will be checked. Where appropriate, show the cost of leaving a problem unresolved. These records also give customer reviews a clear account of the work completed and recommendations still awaiting action. 

Trace brings these practices together in the SAMPLE method: 

Use this framework to connect each test result with the system’s condition and a clear next step. 

Listen to the full conversation above. Explore related episodes below. Stay engaged, keep learning, and continue scaling up your knowledge! 

 

Timestamps 

02:20 — Trace reflects on listener feedback from AWT and how shared experiences can encourage professional growth 

05:50 — Mark Lewis’s award acceptance illustrates the value of lasting friendships within water treatment 

08:30 — The Hang offers a way to continue industry conversations, share challenges, and learn from colleagues 

10:40 — Trace outlines AWT technical training options to help professionals choose relevant continuing education 

18:00 — Listener questions from Episodes 397 and 408 connect testing practices with documented procedures 

19:30 — Conflicting conductivity readings introduce the need to verify results before making changes that affect water use and chemical feed 

24:00 — Representative sampling matters because even a correctly performed test can answer the wrong question 

25:50 — Trace explains how to check flushing at a sample station against water collected at the system’s sampling source 

28:10 — Recording sample time, location, source, and operating conditions gives future troubleshooting essential context 

31:00 — An account baseline establishes what healthy operation looks like before technicians investigate an abnormal result 

34:30 — Comparing readings over time helps distinguish a single result from a meaningful operating trend 

36:30 — Test kit condition, reagent handling, and instrument maintenance determine whether results deserve confidence 

39:00 — Known standards help verify meters and investigate disagreement with controller readings 

41:00 — Trace examines related measurements, so an abnormal conductivity result does not become an isolated adjustment 

44:20 — A structured service report explains observations, collected data, interpretation, actions, and verification 

46:40 — Documenting the cost of inaction and assigning ownership makes recommendations easier for customers to act on 

50:10 — The SAMPLE method combines sampling, baselines, trends, instrument verification, broader testing, and documentation 

53:10 — Industrial Water Week invites professionals to celebrate their work, share equipment photos, and thank people who have helped their careers 

 

Quotes 

“And our real goal is to collect the right information in a consistent way so we can make better decisions with that information.” 

“So, a perfectly performed test on the wrong sample gives you a perfectly wrong answer.” 

“One data point can be a clue, but a trend is evidence and that’s what we’re going for.” 

“If we don’t write it down, it didn’t happen.”

 

Connect with Scaling UP! H2O 

Submit a show idea: Submit a Show Idea 

LinkedIn: in/traceblackmore/ 

YouTube: @ScalingUpH2O 

 

Scaling UP! H2O Resources Mentioned 

AWT (Association of Water Technologies) 

Scaling UP! H2O Academy video courses 

The Rising Tide Mastermind  

Episode 397 Pinks and Blues: How to look at your tests  

Episode 408 Pinks and Blues: The Power of Processes  

AWT Technical Training Seminars  

 

2026 Events for Water Professionals 

Check out our Scaling UP! H2O Events Calendar where we’ve listed every event Water Treaters should be aware of by clicking HERE.  

 

This episode is made possible through our valued partners at