Libsyn Directory

#572: Can You Trust Industry-Funded Nutrition Studies? Here’s How to Tell

Release Date: 08/05/2025

#592: How Much Protein is Actually Healthy? – Eric Helms, PhD & Matt Nagra, ND

Sigma Nutrition Radio

In this episode, the discussion turns to a deceptively simple question that sits at the centre of countless nutrition debates: how much protein do we actually need? On one side, there are confident claims that very high protein intakes are not just beneficial but essential for maximising strength, performance, and muscle mass. On the other, equally strong assertions that the current RDA is entirely sufficient for most people, and that going beyond it is unnecessary or even harmful. Dr. Eric Helms and Dr. Matthew Nagra work through what the evidence actually tells us when we step away from...

#591: Maintaining Functional Capacity with Age – Brendan Egan, PhD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Maintaining the ability to carry out everyday tasks and live independently is often described as a cornerstone of healthy ageing. But what actually happens to muscle strength, power, and functional ability as we get older? And how inevitable is their decline? At what point do changes in muscle function really begin to matter for day-to-day life? Is loss of strength an unavoidable consequence of ageing itself, or does it reflect something more modifiable? If declines are not fixed, what kinds of training or lifestyle interventions genuinely make a difference, and how strong is the evidence...

#590: Is the Nutrient Density of Crops Declining? – Edward Joy, PhD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Nutrient density refers to the concentration of vitamins and minerals in crops relative to their yield. There are widespread claims that today’s fruits, vegetables, and grains contain fewer micronutrients than in decades past, often linked to modern farming practices or soil degradation. This issue is important because if staple crops become less nutritious, it could silently undermine dietary quality and contribute to micronutrient deficiencies (“hidden hunger”) in populations. Dr. Edward Joy is uniquely qualified to address this topic. As a senior research fellow in food systems and...

Does Processing Really Make Food Unhealthy? (SNP47)

Sigma Nutrition Radio

This is a Premium-exclusive episode of the podcast. To listen to the full episode you need to be subscribed to . Recently we (Danny Lennon & Alan Flanagan) were invited to ‘Processing the Evidence’, a “behind closed doors” workshop to discuss the latest scientific evidence on the role of processed foods in human health. The event was organized by Professors Ciarán Forde and Vincenzo Fogliano of Wageningen University in the Netherlands. The workshop attendees included a range of prominent researchers across a range of domains related to food processing,...

#589: Causal Inference in Nutrition Science – Daniel Ibsen, PhD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

This episode explores how asking better questions and using stronger methods can resolve much of the confusion in nutrition science. Dr. Daniel Ibsen discusses why nutrition research often produces conflicting results and how careful methodological thinking can clarify true diet-disease relationships. Nutrition science has unique challenges – diets are complex, people self-report their food intake imperfectly, and we can’t easily run long-term diet experiments on people. Dr. Ibsen explains how embracing concepts like food substitution analysis, the “target trial” framework, and...

#588: Menstrual Cycle “Syncing”: Do the Claims Hold Up to Evidence? – Expert Panel

Sigma Nutrition Radio

How much do hormonal fluctuations really influence performance and recovery? Should women be adjusting their training and nutrition based on the menstrual cycle? And do female athletes need different protein strategies or recovery protocols than men? These are questions that have fuelled countless online claims, from rigid “cycle syncing” programmes to supposedly gender-specific nutrition rules. But how much of that is actually grounded in evidence? In this episode, the conversation tackles those debates head-on, exploring what we truly know about female physiology, adaptation, and...

#587: How Should Nutrition Be Taught in Medical Training? – Akash Patel

Sigma Nutrition Radio

This episode centers on the critical gap in nutrition education within medical training and efforts to bridge it. Guest Akash Patel, a medical student who led a pilot nutrition curriculum, discusses why doctors receive little formal training in nutrition despite poor diet being a major driver of disease. With diet-related conditions (obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, etc.) contributing heavily to morbidity and healthcare costs, the conversation highlights a pivotal push to better equip physicians in nutritional knowledge and counseling. Patel’s work comes at a turning point: there...

#586: The Manufactured Collapse of Expertise

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Never before has there been greater access to information about nutrition and health. But never before has there been such a low barrier to being seen as an “expert”. There are large numbers of people getting information from, and basing their health decisions on, people who don’t have direct expertise in the field in which they are talking about. Moreover, some promote the lack of domain expertise as a feature, not a bug. They claim that those that were conventionally seen as domain experts are either brainwashed, lazy in their thinking, or outright corrupt. And the solution is instead...

SNP46: Reviewing Six Key Insights from the Year’s Conversations

Sigma Nutrition Radio

This is a Premium-exclusive episode of the podcast. To listen to the full episode you need to be subscribed to . Each year, the conversations on Sigma Nutrition Radio aim to examine the ideas that shape how we understand nutrition, health, and human behavior. This episode brings together the key insights from those discussions, revisiting the most important themes, emerging evidence, and shifts in understanding from the past year. Across topics such as dietary guidelines, ultra-processed foods, sleep, metabolism, environmental exposures, and the psychology of eating, this review...

#585: Why We Think Poorly: Reason, Emotion, and Evidence-Based Reasoning

Sigma Nutrition Radio

We take a look at critical thinking in science and healthcare, examining how we often fall prey to cognitive biases, emotional reasoning, and flawed thinking. Drawing from six different experts in their respective fields, the episode explores why we sometimes believe we are being rational when in fact our conclusions aren’t truly evidence-based. The discussion spans what genuine evidence-based practice means, how domain expertise matters, and how factors like identity, beliefs, and emotions can derail objective reasoning. Timestamps [02:56] Dr. David Nunan on evidence-based medicine...

More Episodes

Nutrition science plays a pivotal role in shaping public health advice, but the influence of industry funding on research has become a pressing concern. In this episode we want to examine whether we can trust nutrition studies funded by food and beverage companies, and how you can discern study credibility.

The discussion is highly relevant in today’s landscape, where conflicts of interest and bias in research are under scrutiny amidst debates on sugar, processed foods, and diet recommendations. By exploring how industry sponsorship might skew results or interpretations, this episode speaks to broader issues of scientific trustworthiness and evidence-based policy in nutrition and public health.

In this episode, we take a look at some recent publications that showed how study results and reporting differed significantly depending on if industry had funded the study or not. We delve into how this happens. As most often it is not a case of data fabrication or corruption, but rather how bias leads to studies being designed and reported differently.

We walk through some examples, as well as highlighting some industry-funded studies that didn’t provide a “pro-industry” result and conclusion.

The hope is that the episode allows you to understand why this is a problem, how to spot it, and how to know if you can trust the results of an industry-funded study.

Timestamps

[00:36] Alan’s upcoming study
[04:47] Discussion on industry funding in nutrition research
[15:06] Case study: industry influence on red meat research
[30:43] Case study: artificial sweeteners and industry influence
[36:37] Case study: sugar industry’s role in research
[38:06] Critical appraisal of industry-funded studies
[51:58] Case study: when industry-funded study results can be trusted
[01:01:51] Guidelines for assessing research quality
[01:07:14] Key ideas segment (premium-only)

Related Resources

Join the Sigma email newsletter for free
Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium
Join Alan's Alinea Nutrition Research Hub
Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course
Recommended episode: #472: Compared To What? – Understanding Food Substitution Analysis & Adjustment Models
Studies mentioned:

Timestamps

Related Resources

TOPICS