loader from loading.io

#572: Can You Trust Industry-Funded Nutrition Studies? Here’s How to Tell

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Release Date: 08/05/2025

#588: Menstrual Cycle “Syncing”: Do the Claims Hold Up to Evidence? – Expert Panel show art #588: Menstrual Cycle “Syncing”: Do the Claims Hold Up to Evidence? – Expert Panel

Sigma Nutrition Radio

How much do hormonal fluctuations really influence performance and recovery? Should women be adjusting their training and nutrition based on the menstrual cycle? And do female athletes need different protein strategies or recovery protocols than men? These are questions that have fuelled countless online claims, from rigid “cycle syncing” programmes to supposedly gender-specific nutrition rules. But how much of that is actually grounded in evidence? In this episode, the conversation tackles those debates head-on, exploring what we truly know about female physiology, adaptation, and...

info_outline #587: How Should Nutrition Be Taught in Medical Training? – Akash Patel show art #587: How Should Nutrition Be Taught in Medical Training? – Akash Patel

Sigma Nutrition Radio

This episode centers on the critical gap in nutrition education within medical training and efforts to bridge it. Guest Akash Patel, a medical student who led a pilot nutrition curriculum, discusses why doctors receive little formal training in nutrition despite poor diet being a major driver of disease. With diet-related conditions (obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, etc.) contributing heavily to morbidity and healthcare costs, the conversation highlights a pivotal push to better equip physicians in nutritional knowledge and counseling. Patel’s work comes at a turning point: there...

info_outline #586: The Manufactured Collapse of Expertise show art #586: The Manufactured Collapse of Expertise

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Never before has there been greater access to information about nutrition and health. But never before has there been such a low barrier to being seen as an “expert”. There are large numbers of people getting information from, and basing their health decisions on, people who don’t have direct expertise in the field in which they are talking about. Moreover, some promote the lack of domain expertise as a feature, not a bug. They claim that those that were conventionally seen as domain experts are either brainwashed, lazy in their thinking, or outright corrupt. And the solution is instead...

info_outline SNP46: Reviewing Six Key Insights from the Year’s Conversations show art SNP46: Reviewing Six Key Insights from the Year’s Conversations

Sigma Nutrition Radio

This is a Premium-exclusive episode of the podcast. To listen to the full episode you need to be subscribed to . Each year, the conversations on Sigma Nutrition Radio aim to examine the ideas that shape how we understand nutrition, health, and human behavior. This episode brings together the key insights from those discussions, revisiting the most important themes, emerging evidence, and shifts in understanding from the past year. Across topics such as dietary guidelines, ultra-processed foods, sleep, metabolism, environmental exposures, and the psychology of eating, this review...

info_outline #585: Why We Think Poorly: Reason, Emotion, and Evidence-Based Reasoning show art #585: Why We Think Poorly: Reason, Emotion, and Evidence-Based Reasoning

Sigma Nutrition Radio

We take a look at critical thinking in science and healthcare, examining how we often fall prey to cognitive biases, emotional reasoning, and flawed thinking. Drawing from six different experts in their respective fields, the episode explores why we sometimes believe we are being rational when in fact our conclusions aren’t truly evidence-based. The discussion spans what genuine evidence-based practice means, how domain expertise matters, and how factors like identity, beliefs, and emotions can derail objective reasoning. Timestamps [02:56] Dr. David Nunan on evidence-based medicine...

info_outline #584: EAT-Lancet: Does the Planetary Health Diet Improve Human Health? show art #584: EAT-Lancet: Does the Planetary Health Diet Improve Human Health?

Sigma Nutrition Radio

How should we think about diets that claim to optimise both human and planetary health? Can a single “reference diet” really balance the complex trade-offs between nutrition adequacy, chronic disease prevention, and environmental sustainability? These questions have gained renewed attention with the release of the 2025 update to the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet. The original 2019 report proposed a mostly plant-based dietary pattern designed to improve population health while staying within planetary boundaries. But since then, new data have emerged—on nutrient requirements, disease...

info_outline #583: Ultra-Processed Foods & Fixing the Food Environment – Kevin Hall, PhD show art #583: Ultra-Processed Foods & Fixing the Food Environment – Kevin Hall, PhD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Ultra-processed foods have become central to the way we eat and to many of the challenges we face in public health nutrition. They dominate supermarket shelves, shape population diets, and often appear as the prime suspect in rising obesity and metabolic disease rates. But beyond the label itself, what exactly makes these foods problematic? Is it their nutrient composition, their texture and palatability, the rate at which we consume them, or the broader environments that make them so accessible and appealing? The debate around ultra-processed foods sits at the intersection of metabolic...

info_outline SNP45: Antioxidants – What You Need To Know show art SNP45: Antioxidants – What You Need To Know

Sigma Nutrition Radio

This is a Premium-exclusive episode of the podcast. To listen to the full episode you need to be subscribed to . What exactly are “antioxidants,” and why do they get so much hype? We often hear that blueberries, dark chocolate, and red wine are healthy because they’re packed with antioxidants – but is the story really as simple as “more antioxidants = better health”? In this episode, Danny explores the true role of antioxidants in the body, challenging simplistic narratives. Are antioxidants magic molecules that single-handedly prevent aging and disease? Or is the...

info_outline #582: GLP-1 Agonists: Side Effects, Management and Diet – Dr. Spencer Nadolsky show art #582: GLP-1 Agonists: Side Effects, Management and Diet – Dr. Spencer Nadolsky

Sigma Nutrition Radio

GLP-1 receptor agonists have emerged as a groundbreaking tool in obesity treatment. In this episode, Dr. Spencer Nadolsky (an obesity specialist) explains how these medications are now yielding unprecedented weight loss outcomes in people with obesity.  The discussion centers on GLP-1 agonist drugs like semaglutide and tirzepatide: how they work, how much weight loss they can produce, and why they represent a paradigm shift in obesity management.  Importantly, the conversation addresses practical aspects of using these drugs, including managing their side effects and optimizing...

info_outline #581: What Is Successful Public Nutrition Policy? And Why Is It So Hard to Achieve? – Emily Callahan, RD, MPH show art #581: What Is Successful Public Nutrition Policy? And Why Is It So Hard to Achieve? – Emily Callahan, RD, MPH

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Public nutrition policy plays a critical role in shaping population health through laws, guidelines, and programs that influence what people eat. In this episode, Emily Callahan, an expert in nutrition policy, talks about why public nutrition policies often fall short and what “success” looks like. They discuss how evidence-based nutrition interventions can stall due to political or practical barriers, and explore examples ranging from federal food assistance programs to sodium reduction initiatives. Crucially, they address how to evaluate if a policy has worked and highlight emerging...

info_outline
 
More Episodes

Nutrition science plays a pivotal role in shaping public health advice, but the influence of industry funding on research has become a pressing concern. In this episode we want to examine whether we can trust nutrition studies funded by food and beverage companies, and how you can discern study credibility. 

The discussion is highly relevant in today’s landscape, where conflicts of interest and bias in research are under scrutiny amidst debates on sugar, processed foods, and diet recommendations. By exploring how industry sponsorship might skew results or interpretations, this episode speaks to broader issues of scientific trustworthiness and evidence-based policy in nutrition and public health. 

In this episode, we take a look at some recent publications that showed how study results and reporting differed significantly depending on if industry had funded the study or not. We delve into how this happens. As most often it is not a case of data fabrication or corruption, but rather how bias leads to studies being designed and reported differently.

We walk through some examples, as well as highlighting some industry-funded studies that didn’t provide a “pro-industry” result and conclusion.

The hope is that the episode allows you to understand why this is a problem, how to spot it, and how to know if you can trust the results of an industry-funded study.

Timestamps

  • [00:36] Alan’s upcoming study
  • [04:47] Discussion on industry funding in nutrition research
  • [15:06] Case study: industry influence on red meat research
  • [30:43] Case study: artificial sweeteners and industry influence
  • [36:37] Case study: sugar industry’s role in research
  • [38:06] Critical appraisal of industry-funded studies
  • [51:58] Case study: when industry-funded study results can be trusted
  • [01:01:51] Guidelines for assessing research quality
  • [01:07:14] Key ideas segment (premium-only)

Related Resources