loader from loading.io

#589: Causal Inference in Nutrition Science – Daniel Ibsen, PhD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Release Date: 12/30/2025

#599: Does Unprocessed Red Meat Increase Diabetes Risk? – Gil Carvalho, PhD MD & Mario Kratz, PhD show art #599: Does Unprocessed Red Meat Increase Diabetes Risk? – Gil Carvalho, PhD MD & Mario Kratz, PhD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

This episode examines whether unprocessed red meat has a causal role in (1) type 2 diabetes risk and intermediate measures of glucose intolerance (insulin resistance, beta cell dysfunction, glycemic markers) and (2) cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. While there is commonly observed risk signal from observational cohorts, there exist short-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that show largely null effects on glucose homeostasis. This had led to differing opinions and interpretations of the evidence base. Some feel that in the context of an otherwise healthy diet, there isn’t much to...

info_outline #598: How Do Exercise & Diet Interact to Improve Glycaemic Control? – Jenna Gillen, PhD show art #598: How Do Exercise & Diet Interact to Improve Glycaemic Control? – Jenna Gillen, PhD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

This episode examines how exercise and nutrition interact to influence glycaemic control, with particular focus on the postprandial period (i.e., the hours after eating) and on “time-efficient” exercise strategies such as low-volume interval training. Dr. Jenna Gillen outlines the physiological basis for why muscle contraction can acutely reduce post-meal glucose excursions, why repeated sessions can accumulate into longer-term improvements in insulin sensitivity, and why the nutrition context (pre- and post-exercise feeding, carbohydrate availability, and energy balance) can meaningfully...

info_outline #597: Behavioral Psychology in Diet & Health Counselling – David Creel, PhD, RD show art #597: Behavioral Psychology in Diet & Health Counselling – David Creel, PhD, RD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

In clinical practice effective nutrition, exercise, and obesity care is rarely about identifying the single “best” plan on paper. Instead, sustainable change depends on behavioral psychology: understanding the person’s context, motivation, barriers, and patterns, then co-designing practical steps that can actually be implemented in real life. David Creel PhD, RD is a clinical psychologist and registered dietitian working in weight management at the Cleveland Clinic. Dr. Creel discusses how clinicians can bridge the gap between “optimal recommendations” and what is most likely to...

info_outline #596: Why Do Omega-3 Trials Show Mixed Results? show art #596: Why Do Omega-3 Trials Show Mixed Results?

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Omega-3 fatty acids (particularly EPA and DHA) have a long history in nutrition and cardiovascular medicine, yet the clinical trial literature is often perceived as inconsistent. This episode examines why some randomized trials show clear benefit while others show null or mixed findings, and how differences in trial design, dose, population risk, and outcome selection can materially change what we observe. A key theme is separating (1) the persistent cultural narratives around omega-3s (including origin stories that do not hold up well to modern evidence) from (2) the more precise, mechanistic...

info_outline #595: Neuroplasticity and Reducing Risk of Cognitive Impairment – Dr. Majid Fotuhi show art #595: Neuroplasticity and Reducing Risk of Cognitive Impairment – Dr. Majid Fotuhi

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Conversations about brain health have been dominated by a competing mix of fatalism and over-promising, with aging framed as inevitable decline and “brain optimisation” sold through weak evidence. So how should we think about cognition across the lifespan? In this episode, we explore the idea that neuroplasticity does not disappear in adulthood, but instead continues to respond, for better or worse, to repeated behaviours and exposures. Much of what is labelled age-related cognitive decline may in fact reflect an accumulation of modifiable risk factors. We also dig into how to critically...

info_outline How Much Dietary Fiber Do We Need to be Healthy? (SNP48) show art How Much Dietary Fiber Do We Need to be Healthy? (SNP48)

Sigma Nutrition Radio

This is a Premium-exclusive episode of the podcast. To listen to the full episode you need to be subscribed to . This episode examines dietary fiber through the lens of a practical, clinically relevant question: if higher fiber intakes are consistently associated with reduced chronic disease risk, what intake level should we be aiming for to meaningfully improve health outcomes? The discussion deliberately spans from common online claims that fiber is “not essential” (and therefore unnecessary), through to mechanistic reasoning and the highest-quality evidence we have for...

info_outline #594: Can Muscle Still Adapt Positively When Training Under Low Energy Availability? – Jose Areta, PhD show art #594: Can Muscle Still Adapt Positively When Training Under Low Energy Availability? – Jose Areta, PhD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Dr. José Areta and colleagues recently carried out a human intervention study examining how a pronounced, short-term energy deficit interacts with an aerobic training stimulus to shape endocrine, metabolic, and skeletal muscle proteomic adaptations. The core premise is that “low energy availability” is often discussed in a largely unidirectional risk framework, yet human physiology evolved under intermittent energy scarcity, and therefore adaptive responses may be more nuanced than “energy deficit equals impaired adaptation.” The study used tightly controlled diet and exercise,...

info_outline #593: Can We Define Hyper-Palatable Foods? And Is Processing Actually the Problem? – Tera Fazzino, PhD show art #593: Can We Define Hyper-Palatable Foods? And Is Processing Actually the Problem? – Tera Fazzino, PhD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

While the term “hyperpalatable” has been used frequently for considerable time to refer to foods that are so appealing and tasty that they drive overeating, this term hasn’t been well-defined nor has there been a universal standard for what it means. One researcher who set out to create an objective definition for hyper-palatable foods (HPFs) is Dr. Tera Fazzino. Using specific defined thresholds of sugar, fat and salt combinations, Dr. Fazzino and colleagues have looked at the impact of consumption of these HPFs. In this episode, we delve into defining HPFs and their nutrient profiles,...

info_outline #592: How Much Protein is Actually Healthy? – Eric Helms, PhD & Matt Nagra, ND show art #592: How Much Protein is Actually Healthy? – Eric Helms, PhD & Matt Nagra, ND

Sigma Nutrition Radio

In this episode, the discussion turns to a deceptively simple question that sits at the centre of countless nutrition debates: how much protein do we actually need? On one side, there are confident claims that very high protein intakes are not just beneficial but essential for maximising strength, performance, and muscle mass. On the other, equally strong assertions that the current RDA is entirely sufficient for most people, and that going beyond it is unnecessary or even harmful. Dr. Eric Helms and Dr. Matthew Nagra work through what the evidence actually tells us when we step away from...

info_outline #591: Maintaining Functional Capacity with Age – Brendan Egan, PhD show art #591: Maintaining Functional Capacity with Age – Brendan Egan, PhD

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Maintaining the ability to carry out everyday tasks and live independently is often described as a cornerstone of healthy ageing. But what actually happens to muscle strength, power, and functional ability as we get older? And how inevitable is their decline? At what point do changes in muscle function really begin to matter for day-to-day life? Is loss of strength an unavoidable consequence of ageing itself, or does it reflect something more modifiable? If declines are not fixed, what kinds of training or lifestyle interventions genuinely make a difference, and how strong is the evidence...

info_outline
 
More Episodes

This episode explores how asking better questions and using stronger methods can resolve much of the confusion in nutrition science. Dr. Daniel Ibsen discusses why nutrition research often produces conflicting results and how careful methodological thinking can clarify true diet-disease relationships.

Nutrition science has unique challenges – diets are complex, people self-report their food intake imperfectly, and we can’t easily run long-term diet experiments on people. Dr. Ibsen explains how embracing concepts like food substitution analysis, the “target trial” framework, and objective dietary assessment can strengthen evidence.

The episode centers on methodological insights that make nutrition research more reliable and actionable. Key themes include defining dietary comparisons explicitly (the “compared to what?” question), considering people’s starting diets, and using causal inference techniques to design better studies.

Daniel B. Ibsen is an epidemiologist and nutritional scientist whose work bridges rigorous causal inference methods with real-world diet and cardiometabolic disease research. He is an Associate Professor at Aarhus University, Denmark.

Timestamps

  • [00:13] Introduction to the topic
  • [03:23] Interview start
  • [08:02] The importance of asking the right questions in nutrition science
  • [22:18] Understanding causal inference in nutrition
  • [28:58] Challenges and approaches in nutrition epidemiology
  • [32:07] Mimicking dietary interventions in studies
  • [32:55] Target trial framework
  • [39:52] Objective vs. subjective dietary assessment
  • [47:01] Why causal effects of ultra-processed foods cannot be identified

Links/Resources: