Between the Lies Podcast

Providing Positivity & Balance For An Uncertain World

Scott Bessent's "Treasury Twist": Can Stablecoins Really Fix $40 Trillion in Debt? | Between The Lies 049 10/17/2026

New Homes Now Cheaper Than Old Ones: How the Federal Reserve Flipped the Housing Market | Between The Lies 048 10/09/2026

Mortgage Rates Cross 7%: A 2008 Mortgage Insider Says This Is What Normal Looks Like | Between The Lies 047 10/02/2026

Kroger & 30 Million Fewer Grocery Trips | Between The Lies 046 09/22/2026

60% Odds of a Fed Rate Hike: What the Bond Market Already Knows | Between The Lies 045 09/16/2026

From $475 in the Negative to Owning a Bank: One Investor's Infinite Banking Real Estate Playbook | IBC IRL #2 09/10/2026

Nvidia Building the Next Bailout? BlackRock, Brookfield & the $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Bet | Between The Lies 044 08/14/2026

Nvidia Building the Next Bailout? BlackRock, Brookfield & the $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Bet | Between The Lies 044 Nvidia doesn't have a demand problem, or so they'd have you believe. This week Rob Brayton and I dig into the news that Nvidia wants Wall Street to build out a $500 billion financing ecosystem so its own customers can afford to keep buying its chips. Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs, and KKR are the names attached to it, and the pitch is that AI compute should be treated like an "infrastructure asset class," the same bucket as cell towers and toll roads. Except cell towers and toll roads generate revenue from people who actually use them. Not one of the AI companies driving this boom has turned a profit. Rob breaks down why Bank of America is publicly trying to downplay the "circular investing" concerns while simultaneously helping assemble the exact group of private capital firms that would make those concerns real. We talk about why this isn't a bank problem, it's a private-capital problem, because the actual banks won't touch the risk. Then we go where this always goes: who's going to be holding the bag. If this financing structure gets built, those packaged loans get sliced into derivatives and marketed straight into your 401(k) and IRA, whether you ever chose to be exposed to Nvidia's balance sheet or not. Sound familiar? It should. We call it what it is, 2006 with a chip shortage instead of a housing shortage. We also get into the parts nobody's talking about: data center land fights breaking out across the country, why calling data center opponents "Luddites" misses that a lot of their instincts are correct, and why an economy this dependent on AI adoption can't actually function when the average American associates AI with losing their job or their land. Rob and I also get into the moral side of investing, you don't have to believe AI is evil to decide you don't want your retirement account financing something you have real reservations about. If that's you, there are other ways to grow capital that don't route your money through Wall Street's latest "everyone wins" story. Check out for our free toolkit & Luke's book, Between the Lies If you're tired of discovering your retirement account is quietly funding things you never agreed to, this episode's for you. Full breakdown below. /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/42416640

The Yen Carry Trade Unwind: Why the US Treasury Stepped In to Save Japan's Currency | Between The Lies 043 08/13/2026

The Yen Carry Trade Unwind: Why the US Treasury Stepped In to Save Japan's Currency | Between The Lies 043 For thirty years, the smartest money in the world ran the same play: borrow yen for basically nothing, dump it into something that pays more than nothing, repeat. It's not a scandal. It's arbitrage. But arbitrage built on a central bank promise is still just a promise, and last week that promise cracked. This week Rob Brayton and I get into the yen carry trade, what it actually is, how it survived three decades of near-zero Japanese interest rates, and why the Bank of Japan finally raising rates set off the kind of turmoil that made the US government do something it hasn't done since 1998: step directly into the market and start buying yen to stop the bleeding. Rob walks through the full arc, the zero-rate era that kicked off around 1999, the brief reprieve after the financial crisis, the renewed expansion from 2013 through 2022, and the final blowoff top as US rates spiked and everybody piled back into cheap yen to keep the trade alive. Then the Bank of Japan started tightening, the yen started sliding, and the US decided the risk to our own Treasury market was too big to ignore. We also get into the Austrian read on all of it, which, shocker, is not the same as the mainstream diagnosis. This isn't a mystery. Inflate the money supply without the growth to back it, and you get distortion. Artificially low rates send capital to the wrong places, and every "fix" just delays the correction instead of resolving it. Rob's line says it best: the real question isn't whether intervention works, it's how far you can kick the can before it actually breaks. We also talk about who else is exposed, China's treasury holdings, other economies riding the same cheap-yen wave, and why it's fair to assume nobody's books are as clean as the headlines suggest. But the real value of this episode isn't the macro tour. It's the pivot Rob makes at the end: stop looking at Japan's balance sheet and start looking at your own. Too much debt and not enough growth is the root problem in Tokyo. It's also the root problem for a lot of households. The US gets away with its debt load because it has a massive production engine behind it. Do you? For our free toolkit: /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/42416295

Charlie Munger's GROWTH Rule & Yahoo Finance's $100K Advice: What are they not telling you? | Between The Lies 042 08/04/2026

Charlie Munger's GROWTH Rule & Yahoo Finance's $100K Advice: What are they not telling you? | Between The Lies 042 Two Yahoo Finance articles dropped this week, both built around the same number: $100,000. One says you can ease off the gas once you hit it. The other tells you what to do with it, pay off debt, build an emergency fund, start a sinking fund, max your retirement contributions. Rob Brayton and I go line by line through both, and honestly, it didn't take long to figure out why this advice keeps people stuck instead of getting them free. Here's the thing nobody says out loud: a sinking fund and an emergency fund are basically what a dividend-paying whole life policy through a mutual company already does, except your money's actually working the whole time instead of sitting in an envelope earning nothing. Rob breaks down why paying off high-interest debt with a lump sum of cash isn't the free lunch it sounds like, you're not eliminating the cost, you're just choosing who eats it, you or a bank. Then we get into the part that made me want to record this episode in the first place. Buried in the "ease off the gas" article is a list of where millionaires under 43 are supposedly putting their money: gold, real estate, artwork, and, I'm not kidding, "cryptocurrency, more than a craze." Not Bitcoin specifically. Just crypto, broadly, like a Vegas chip. That's not a portfolio, that's a dartboard. And then there's Berkshire Hathaway. $397.4 billion sitting in cash and cash equivalents. If speculation and diversification-for-its-own-sake were actually the winning strategy, Buffett and Munger would be the last people hoarding cash right now. They're not. That tells you everything about the gap between advice given to regular people and the actual behavior of the people who built real fortunes. Rob also unpacks Charlie Munger's GROWTH framework, gain control, root your investments, optimize tax management, weed out debt, tap additional income, heighten discipline, and honestly, we don't disagree with a word of it. The problem isn't Munger's principles. It's the ClickBank-style investment suggestions bolted onto them that have nothing to do with how Munger or Buffett actually built wealth. We close on inflation, why $100K today isn't what $100K was even six years ago, and why "ease off the gas" is exactly the wrong instinct once you've built a real system. If your money's finally working, that's the moment to accelerate, not coast. CTA: Get the free Perfect Spiral Capital toolkit — including a free copy of Luke Tatum's book Between The Lies — at PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast. /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/42310175

Why This Dad Ditched His Honda Pilot Lease for a Debt-Free Minivan | IBC IRL #1 07/27/2026

Why This Dad Ditched His Honda Pilot Lease for a Debt-Free Minivan | IBC IRL #1 I love when we get to do these "in real life" episodes, because it's easy to nod along to Luke and Rob talk theory every week, but it hits different when you hear an actual guy in Springfield, Missouri tell you he used his policy loan to take down a dying maple tree and then buy his way out of the worst financial decision of his life, a leased Honda Pilot. This one's a conversation between Brian Pritchard and our own Luke Tatum, sitting down with listener Brendan Seburn, who's been following the show since the beginning. Brendan didn't jump into IBC overnight. He heard Luke on the Tom Woods Show back in early 2023, filed it away, then went and burned through 60-something episodes of the Lara-Murphy Show while driving for work, letting the concept click into place piece by piece. That's the real path most people take, skepticism first, understanding second, action third. What makes this episode worth your time is the specificity. Brendan's policy isn't massive. He's paying around $80 a month. This isn't a "rich guy" story. It's a young dad with three kids under three, a modest premium, and real bills, a hazard tree that had to come down, then a lease payoff and a used minivan purchase that he'd rather own outright than finance through a dealership. Luke breaks down the death benefit math in plain terms: even after Brendan pulled out policy loans, the insurance company just does subtraction. The coverage doesn't vanish, it's reduced by what's borrowed, and it's still there. That's the piece people miss when they hear "he spent all his cash value" and assume the whole thing collapsed. Brian closes the episode with the idea of "conceptual legacy," not just the money, but teaching your kids how this works before they need it, so IBC becomes a generational habit instead of a one-time discovery. If you're the type who's already suspicious of what a savings account actually does for you, or you've had that nagging feeling that "buy term and invest the difference" doesn't tell the whole story, this episode is a good gut-check. It's not a pitch. It's a guy telling you what actually happened when the tree fell down and the lease came due. Get the free toolkit, a copy of Luke's Amazon bestseller, and two full video courses on infinite banking at . /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/42224720

Fort Knox vs. Beijing: Is China About to Expose the World's Gold Lie? | Between The Lies 041 07/17/2026

Fort Knox vs. Beijing: Is China About to Expose the World's Gold Lie? | Between The Lies 041 Gold's always king, right? Except right now, China might be trying to prove that most of the "gold" the world thinks it owns doesn't actually exist in a vault anywhere. This week Luke, Rob, and I dig into a video from Tom Bilyeu that got all three of us talking about what China's been quietly doing with its gold reserves, and why it should matter to you even if you've never bought an ounce of it in your life. Central banks have been rotating out of US Treasuries and into physical gold for a couple years now, but China's play looks different. They're not just stacking metal. They appear to be positioning to strip the "paper gold" games out of their own system entirely, forcing a real accounting of how much physical gold actually exists versus how many claims to it are floating around the financial system. We get into why that's such a big deal: fractional reserve banking isn't just a dollar problem, it's a gold problem too. There are more paper claims to gold than there is gold. Nobody really knows the true ratio. If China builds a clearing house that forces price discovery on real, audited gold, that's a direct challenge to a system the US dollar has quietly leaned on for decades. I push back a little on the doom framing here, the US dollar's value has never come from us behaving responsibly, it comes from everyone else holding it too. That's not exactly a strong foundation, and this episode is about what happens when someone starts testing it. We also talk about the Japanese yen's decades-long low-rate arbitrage trade, why Poland and the UK keep buying more Treasuries while China quietly sells them off, and whether a gold-backed yuan could actually force better outcomes, like an asset-backed dollar, rather than just being bad news for America. Bottom line: none of us know exactly how this plays out. But paying attention to what's happening behind the headlines is how you make better decisions with your own money, regardless of which currency wins this round. Websites Referenced: PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast (free toolkit + Luke's book) pricedingold.com (Rob's reference resource) YouTube: Rob Brayton PSC If you're tired of hoping the people running the global monetary system have your best interest at heart, head to PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast and grab the free toolkit. It won't fix Fort Knox, but it'll fix what you can actually control. /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/42133550

The Part of Banking You're Not Supposed to See | Between the Lies 040 07/02/2026

From Snapchat to SpaceX: Why IPOs Are Where Smart Money Exits and Dumb Money Enters | Between The Lies 039 06/22/2026

From Snapchat to SpaceX: Why IPOs Are Where Smart Money Exits and Dumb Money Enters | Between The Lies 039 Elon Musk just became the richest person in the world by a margin that's hard to even process. $1.1 trillion in personal net worth. Jeff Bezos is sitting at a distant $240-something billion looking like a participation trophy. And the thing that pushed Elon over the edge? SpaceX going public. Now, the internet had its predictable response. Half the world wanted to know why he doesn't just give it all away. The other half figured he must be sitting on a pile of coins like Scrooge McDuck. Both are wrong, and that gap between what people believe about wealth and what's actually true is exactly why this podcast exists. This week, Luke, Rob, and I used the SpaceX IPO as a lens to zoom out on something bigger: what wealth actually is, how IPOs actually work, and why the people who built a dream from the ground floor deserve every dollar they made. Luke makes a connection I didn't see coming, the 1986 Microsoft IPO created 12,000 millionaires, and one of those millionaires was Gabe Newell. Gabe Newell went on to found Valve Software and Steam. So the next time someone tells you IPO wealth is obscene, ask them if they use Steam. Rob breaks down why a $2 trillion market cap on $5 billion in revenue is the part worth being skeptical about, not the success itself, but the timing of when the average person gets in. IPOs are where the ground-floor investors get their money back. That's not cynicism, that's structure. And Luke drops the fact that ties this all together: Elon Musk earns $54,000 a year from SpaceX. That's his salary. He doesn't need more income because he doesn't need income, he has assets, and he borrows against them. That's not a loophole. That's the strategy. And it's the exact same principle Luke and Rob teach at Perfect Spiral Capital. We also get into the indie film angle, a movie made for a few hundred thousand dollars pulls $100M opening weekend, and the art director complains she only made $8,000. She took the guaranteed paycheck. She didn't take the risk. That's not the system failing her. That's the system working exactly as designed. If you've ever looked at how the wealthy use money and thought "that should be illegal," this episode is for you. And if you've ever been curious about how to build that kind of structure for yourself, without being a billionaire, PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast is where you start. /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/41719535

The Genius Act, SoFi, and the Dollar's Global Digital Takeover Nobody's Talking About 06/05/2026

The Genius Act, SoFi, and the Dollar's Global Digital Takeover Nobody's Talking About You ever wonder why the dollar hasn't collapsed yet, even though by every reasonable Austrian economics metric, it should have? Rob and I spent this episode pulling apart the answer, and it comes in the form of a stablecoin launched by SoFi Bank. Here's the short version: SoFi just rolled out a dollar-pegged stablecoin under the framework opened by the Genius Act. It's backed one-to-one by US Treasury securities. That sounds boring until you realize what it actually does, it allows people in countries with destroyed or nonexistent banking systems to hold and transact in dollars digitally, without going through traditional banking infrastructure. Think about the billions of people on the planet who are unbanked. They don't have a broken banking system, they have no banking system. And a lot of the currencies they live under are so unstable, or outright illegal to use internationally, that dollar access in any form is genuinely valuable. When those people start using dollar-pegged stablecoins, guess what increases? Demand for dollars. And guess what that does? It slows the inflation repatriation scenario that's been a quiet terror in Austrian circles for years, where all those exported dollars come flooding home and we end up in a hyperinflationary spiral. Rob put it plainly: this is a mechanism to undermine other countries' central banks using the dollar. That's not a conspiracy theory. Federal Reserve Governor Waller literally said stablecoins are a tool to "import US monetary policy" across borders. This is the official play. Does that make it good? Not necessarily. It props up the same system we've been critical of. It accelerates fractional reserve lending if every major bank eventually issues its own stablecoin, and they will, SoFi is just the early adopter. Citi and Chase will have their own eventually. But here's the uncomfortable honest take: for people who hold dollar-denominated assets right now, a mechanism that extends dollar demand globally is a short-term stabilizer. It kicks the can further down the road. And Rob and I are both smart enough to know that's not a solution, it's just a more creative delay. What doesn't change is the IBC thesis. Whether stablecoins extend the dollar's run for another decade or accelerate its collapse, the private banking framework Rob and Luke have built their practice around doesn't depend on the Fed making good decisions. It works regardless. Grab the free toolkit at . /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/41544630

The Bond Market’s Wolverine Moment: JPMorgan's CEO Goes Vigilante | Between The Lies 037 05/28/2026

The Bond Market’s Wolverine Moment: JPMorgan's CEO Goes Vigilante | Between The Lies 037 So here's an embarrassing confession to kick things off: I host a financial podcast, I've talked about yield curves, I've connected bond markets to recession indicators, I've done the whole thing, and I still couldn't tell you what a bond actually was in plain English. Rob Brayton fixed that real quick. And it turns out, once you understand the basics, the current situation gets way more interesting. What's happening right now is that the bond market is effectively doing the Fed's job for it. Bond yields are climbing, which makes loans more expensive across the board, for businesses, for consumers, for everyone. The bond market isn't asking. It's telling. And even Jamie Dimon is out there warning that rates could go considerably higher from here. Here's the part I love, even though I'm not exactly a Dimon fan: this is market corrective action. Governments don't actually control economies. They warp them. They push prices and rates to places they don't naturally want to be, and eventually something bends back. We're watching that happen in real time. Rob and I also got into what this signals going forward, a potential contraction, yes, but more specifically what he calls the "higher ledge problem." The longer governments and central banks artificially suppress natural market behavior, the bigger the eventual correction. We've had artificially cheap money for so long that a lot of people have forgotten money has a price. That price is interest. Ron Paul said it, it's true, and the bond market apparently agrees. The tech concentration angle is worth watching too. When almost all the real growth in the stock market is sitting in one sector, a tightening environment hits differently than it would in a diversified market. If corporate bond exposure in tech is as deep as we suspect, that's a compounding risk nobody's pricing in. And then, because we always end on something you can actually do, Rob walks through why rising rates are actually a tailwind for properly structured IBC policies. The dividend structures on dividend-paying whole life improve when rates climb. More importantly, the people who are well-capitalized right now are the ones who'll be playing offense when everyone else is scrambling. You want to be that person. Free toolkit at PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast. And stay tuned, there's something new coming for those of you who already have a policy and aren't sure what to do with it next. /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/41447750

Priced in Gold: What the 1970s Oil Crisis Can Actually Tell Us About Today's Market | Between The Lies 036 05/25/2026

Priced in Gold: What the 1970s Oil Crisis Can Actually Tell Us About Today's Market | Between The Lies 036 You know what's great about cheap energy? Everything. Literally everything gets cheaper, food, travel, starting a business, going on tour with your band. You know what's not great? When a war we didn't have to start keeps gas prices elevated long enough that you start doing the math on whether it's worth visiting your family this summer. That's where we are in Episode 036. Luke, Rob, and I dig into the current oil price situation, why it's lingering, how it compares to the 1970s shocks, and what's really driving the cost of filling up your tank. Spoiler: it's not just a supply chain hiccup. Luke pulled Trump's actual quote where he told reporters that Americans' financial situations "don't motivate him even a little bit" when he's negotiating with Iran. I had a reaction to that. It rhymes with Marie Antoinette. Rob brings something genuinely useful to the table, pricedingold.com. When you measure oil in gold instead of dollars, the picture looks pretty different than the financial media wants you to believe. The 1970s comparison everyone keeps making? It's not apples to apples, and Rob explains exactly why. That's the kind of context you're not going to get from CNBC. We also get into the fertilizer angle, because the same fossil fuel cycle that runs your car runs the nitrogen-rich fertilizers that grow your food. And the lag time means we probably haven't even seen the full grocery bill impact yet. Then we do what we always do, we turn it into something you can actually use. Luke and Rob make the case for why liquid capital, built-in reserves, and a little entrepreneurial positioning can turn a moment of instability into a genuine opportunity. Having dry powder when everyone else is scrambling? That's not just smart, it's the whole game. This is a shorter episode, but it's tight. No filler, just the context you need to understand what's happening, why it's happening, and how to come out on the other side of it better than you went in. Check out Rob's separate channel at Rob Brayton PSC for his deeper financial analyses. Grab the free toolkit at PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast Websites Referenced: /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/41410915

A Tale of Two Economies: Michael Burry’s Warning Amid Lowest Consumer Sentiment In 74 Years | Between The Lies 035 05/13/2026

A Tale of Two Economies: Michael Burry’s Warning Amid Lowest Consumer Sentiment In 74 Years | Between The Lies 035 I'm going to level with you. The numbers we talked about this week genuinely made me stop and stare. The University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index, which they've been tracking for 74 years, just hit 47.6. That's lower than where it was during the 2008 crash. Lower than COVID. The all-time high was 110.1 back in Y2K when everyone was eating brownies and convinced the world was about to end but also fine. We are currently at less than half that. Meanwhile, the stock market is celebrating like it's 1999. So which is it? If you have to ask, you probably feel the answer every time you fill up your gas tank. Rob pointed out that gas hit a national average of $4.50 per gallon, not long after it was sitting at $2.20-something. That's not a statistic. That's your Tuesday. This is the K-shaped economy in real time. Assets are skyrocketing because there's been a 55% expansion in M2, the actual money supply, from 2020 to 2024. Your dollar buys less. The things you buy cost more. The things you don't own keep going up without you. Michael Burry, who called the '08 collapse, isn't saying short the market. He's smarter than that now. He's saying reduce exposure to anything going parabolic. Don't get greedy. The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent, a phrase I had to throw in there and Rob didn't immediately recognize, which made me feel better about myself. The Austrian School called this. Ludwig von Mises basically wrote the instruction manual for how intervention in the economy creates ripple effects that never go where the planners intended. COVID stimulus checks felt like a lifeline. That 55% M2 expansion is what you're living inside of right now. Luke's point in this episode is the one I want you to sit with: you don't need a business degree, a Harvard MBA, or even a winning day trade. You need to stop outsourcing your financial life to institutions that may not be there when you need them. The FDIC did not cover everyone who thought it would. That's the whole show, honestly. The external system is not built for you. Your job is to build something that is. Grab our free toolkit and get started: PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast Websites Referenced: Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED): fred.stlouisfed.org University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index CNBC (Michael Burry quote source, referenced in episode) /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/41288305

Bank of America Does It. Paul Atkins Does It. Should You? The Life Insurance Truth | Between The Lies 034 05/09/2026

Bank of America Does It. Paul Atkins Does It. Should You? The Life Insurance Truth | Between The Lies 034 The SEC Chair walks in with 54 life insurance policies, and the internet collectively loses its mind. Yahoo Finance, Forbes, Fortune, they're all writing the same hit piece with the same confused energy: "Why would anyone do that?" Yeah. Why would anyone do that. This week Luke, Rob, and I dig into the Paul Atkins disclosure story, and honestly, it's one of those moments where the establishment does the work for us. Because here's the thing, every headline calling this bizarre is written by people who apparently never looked at a bank's FDIC financial statement. Spoiler: your bank has hundreds of millions, sometimes billions, in life insurance cash value. It's tier-one capital. It's on their financial statement. It's public. They just don't want to talk about it. We also spend some time on Dave Ramsey, which is always a good time. Specifically, Luke drops the origin story of "buy term and invest the difference,” a phrase credited to A.L. Williams, who then went and created Primerica, where he sold term policies and investments. The exact products. The same pitch. The thing Dave accuses your IBC practitioner of doing? Dave's hero reinvented it to sell his own stuff. Rob breaks down why 54 policies isn't the weird part, the weird part is how most people never think to use life insurance the way banks and wealthy families have for generations. The mechanics of a policy loan, why repaying it puts money back in your own pocket instead of a bank's, and how Atkins probably has $6 million in cash value he can deploy on any deal he wants, no bank approval, no committee, no waiting, that's the story nobody's writing. Thomas Sowell gets a mention (there are no righ or wrong financial choices, only trade-offs), Tom Bilyeu gets a mention (assets are the whole game), and the velocity of money concept gets probably its clearest explanation we've ever done on this show. If you've been curious about IBC and keep bouncing off the jargon, this episode is a good entry point. Real world news story, real dollar figures, real comparison to the Dave Ramsey approach, and a real alternative. Head to PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast for the free toolkit. That's where the education starts. Websites Referenced: PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast FDIC.gov (referenced for looking up bank life insurance assets) Rob Brayton PSC (YouTube) — Dave Ramsey reaction video referenced /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/41232260

Palantir, Tencent, and the Architecture of Financial Surveillance: The X Money Episode | Between The Lies 033 04/29/2026

Palantir, Tencent, and the Architecture of Financial Surveillance: The X Money Episode | Between The Lies 033 Remember when The Circle came out and everyone kind of laughed it off? A social media company that just… becomes the government? Cute little dystopian fiction. Yeah. Elon Musk is pushing X toward full "everything app" status, payments, savings accounts, a Visa partnership, money on deposit. It's being sold as convenience. And it probably will be convenient. That's kind of the problem. This week Luke, Rob, and I dug into what happens when you let a single platform own your financial life. We used WeChat as our case study, a billion-plus users in China, integrated payments, location data, social media, and unencrypted communications all flowing through one pipe. The parent company, Tencent, is technically private. But the Chinese Communist Party holds golden shares, small equity stakes with board seats that give them direct influence over content, regulation, and strategic direction. You don't need a majority. You need the right seat at the table. Here's the part that made my head hurt: the U.S. government just took equity positions in Intel. We've talked about government creep into American corporations on this show before. Add in the fact that credit card companies are already issuing green scores based on your spending habits, and the social credit infrastructure isn't a future problem. It's already partially assembled. The "road to hell is paved with convenience" came up, and I think that's the real thesis here. Nobody signs up for surveillance. They sign up for one-click payments and a 6% savings rate. The control comes later, after the habits are formed and the alternatives have atrophied. Luke made the point that matters most: owning your own banking function, what we talk about every week with IBC, puts the control back in your hands. Not in X. Not in Tencent. Not in whatever government takes a golden share next. A private, non-market-correlated strategy that predates the IRS isn't convenient in the Netflix-buffering sense. But it doesn't go offline when a government subpoena lands either. And Rob reminded us that the problem being "solved" by X Money is convenience, not your actual money problem. Your money problem is that only a fraction of your money is working for you at any given time. That's what IBC solves. One platform to rule them all does not. Also: several of my friends had their X accounts hacked this week. Glad none of them had their bank accounts in there. Free toolkit and more at PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast Websites Referenced: PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/41068015

They All Buried It! Q4 GDP Revisions Prove Again Economic Data Is Political Theater | Between The Lies 032 04/15/2026

They All Buried It! Q4 GDP Revisions Prove Again Economic Data Is Political Theater | Between The Lies 032 There's a move they run every single quarter and it works every time. Some government agency throws out an economic number. It's good. It makes the front page. The world moves on. Then a month later, quietly, that number gets revised down. Then revised again. And by the time the truth shows up, it's page 63 of a policy wonk newsletter that three people read. This week on Between The Lies, Luke, Rob, and I dig into exactly that playbook — specifically the Q4 GDP revision that is honestly a masterclass in "trust me bro" economics. Here's what happened: The advance estimate for Q4 GDP growth came in at 1.4%. Fine. Not great, but fine. Then they did the math — turns out it was really 0.7%. Half. Then this week, another revision. Now it's 0.5%. Less than half of the original number. From a quarter that ended four months ago. Meanwhile, somewhere right now, someone is reading a headline about how the economy added 178,000 jobs in March and feeling great about it. Nobody's telling them we lost 140,000 in February. The frame of reference is everything, and whoever controls the frame controls the story. Luke takes us through why GDP as a metric is already broken before you even get to the revision games — specifically the part where government spending counts as economic activity. The government doesn't make anything. Every dollar they spend, they extracted from you first. So counting that as "growth" is basically counting the hole they dug as part of the foundation. Rob brings the accountability angle. There is none. These aren't people who get fired when they're off by 65% on a major economic indicator. They just update the spreadsheet and put out a new press release. We also get into the Austrian economics bookshelf — Murray Rothbard's Man, Economy, and State, Henry Hazlitt's Economics in One Lesson, Hayek's Fatal Conceit — because once you understand why central planning is structurally incapable of processing economic information, the revision circus makes perfect sense. It was always going to look like this. If you've been feeling like the economy the news describes doesn't match the economy you actually live in, this episode is for you. The data isn't broken. It's working exactly as intended — just not for you. Free toolkit at PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast — Luke's book, video courses, and a community that reads the corrections. Websites Referenced: perfectspiralcapital.com/podcast mises.org (Mises Institute — free Austrian economics audiobooks) /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/40892445

Microsoft, Tesla, and the Magnificent Seven: When "Just Buy the Index" Goes Wrong | Between The Lies 031 04/05/2026

Microsoft, Tesla, and the Magnificent Seven: When "Just Buy the Index" Goes Wrong | Between The Lies 031 They gave it a name. A fancy, Hollywood-sounding name. The Magnificent Seven. Once again reality does it's level best to ape fiction. Welcome back to Between The Lies. I'm Nicky P, here with Luke Tatum and Rob Brayton from Perfect Spiral Capital, and this week we're talking about the seven largest stocks in the S&P 500 — Microsoft, Meta, Tesla, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, and Apple — and why every single one of them is down on the year as of late March 2026. Some of them significantly. Tesla is down 26%. Microsoft is down 15%. The S&P 500 as a whole is sitting at a little over 9% in the red. And these seven companies, which make up roughly 30% of the entire index, are the main reason why. If someone told you to just buy the index and forget about it, they owe you a phone call right now. Luke walks us through why the AI-fueled growth propping up these companies was always shakier than it looked — junk-rated bonds funding data center deals that may never get built, promises of gigawatts of power with no land, no infrastructure, and no clear path to profitability. Disney just pulled a massive deal off the table. Nvidia circulated an internal memo to reassure people they're not the next Enron. That's not a good sign. Rob adds the layer most people miss: when market value drops, that money doesn't vanish. It goes somewhere. Somebody is profiting on the way down, and it's almost never the average person who was told to trust the index. We also dig into the word "growth" itself — one of the most abused terms in finance. Growth measured against what? A dollar that buys less every year? When inflation is the baseline, the bar for real growth is a lot higher than the headlines admit. This connects back to something we've said before: without a stable currency, you can't even trust the scorecard. The show ends where it usually does — with a reminder that uncertainty is not a reason to panic, it's a reason to have a plan. If you want to know the strategies Luke and Rob actually use, the toolkit is at PerfectSpiralCapital.com/podcast. Also worth checking out Rob's separate YouTube channel — Rob Brayton PSC — for deeper dives on a lot of this material. /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/40734240

CNBC Says: Buy Government Bonds, Stagflation Eats Your Savings | Between The Lies 030 03/23/2026

CNBC Says: Buy Government Bonds, Stagflation Eats Your Savings | Between The Lies 030 You've probably been hearing the word "stagflation" thrown around a lot lately and thinking — I have no idea what that means. Don't worry. Neither did I exactly. So I asked my experts. Short version: prices go up, jobs disappear, and the economy stops growing. All at the same time. Fun stuff. The reason this word keeps popping up right now is that we're already living in an economy that's been feeling off for a while — and a few nasty ingredients are coming together at once. Oil prices are up around 40% thanks to ongoing conflict in the Middle East. GDP growth just got revised down. The Fed is holding interest rates steady while everyone waits for cuts that aren't coming. And the job market? Only about 42% of new applicants are actually landing work. The mainstream financial press has a bold solution for all of this: maybe buy some government bonds. Luke, Rob, and I are not fans of that answer. What we actually dig into this episode is the history lesson most talking heads skip. Volcker raised rates to nearly 20% to "tame" the 1970s inflation — but the money printing never actually stopped. It was just covered up with pain. And here's the thing: that lever doesn't exist anymore. We're sitting on over $36 trillion in national debt. You can't Volcker your way out of that without the interest payments alone eating the country alive. The economic definitions themselves keep getting quietly updated, too. Inflation used to mean an increase in the money supply. Now it's whatever number fits neatly into this quarter's CPI basket. That's not math. That's marketing. What we keep coming back to — and I know it sounds like we say it every episode because we do — is that the people who are already operating outside the traditional market are watching all of this from a much more comfortable position. When markets are volatile and your neighbor's 401k is in freefall, the question isn't "how do I survive this?" It's "what can I buy right now?" That's what Infinite Banking builds. Not just protection. Options. If you've been on the fence about understanding how this stuff actually works, now's probably a good time to stop being on the fence. Luke's book, a couple of free video courses, and a real conversation — all of it's waiting for you at . /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/40582830

Smart Money vs. Dumb Money: What Berkshire Hathaway Knows That Your 401k Doesn't | Between The Lies 029 03/12/2026

Smart Money vs. Dumb Money: What Berkshire Hathaway Knows That Your 401k Doesn't | Between The Lies 029 You know that feeling when you're watching a movie and you already know exactly how it ends, but you can't look away anyway? That's basically every episode of this show. And Episode 029 is no different. We're talking about private credit, the $2 to $3.5 trillion shadow lending market that most people have never heard of. Stack on private equity (another $8-10 trillion globally), then add in the insurance assets that have been quietly wired into this whole apparatus (another $7-9 trillion), and you're looking at roughly $20 trillion of exposure sitting just outside the regular banking system. For reference, the entire US banking system, all assets included, is around $23 trillion. That's not a rabbit hole. That's a canyon. The analogy to 2008 isn't subtle. Mortgage-backed securities were the last time someone packaged up a bunch of garbage, slapped a rating on it, and called it a diversified asset. Now we've got leveraged loans being re-leveraged, private capital chasing yield because post-2008 regulations pushed it out of conventional markets, and all of it funneling into a tech sector that's already carrying more of the US economy than any one sector should. Rob brings up a scenario that's been on my mind ever since he said it: what if a private credit collapse is the exact excuse needed to nationalize the financial system? You've seen this play before. Crisis happens, government swoops in, the people who caused the problem get bailed out, and you hold the bag. It's not paranoia; it's the historical record. Berkshire Hathaway is sitting on more cash than ever. Warren Buffett isn't doing that because everything looks fine. He's doing that because when things go on sale, he wants to be the buyer, not the one selling at a loss. That's the whole game. Speaking of which, GameStop. The moment retail investors got too close to seeing how the short machine actually works, the machine shut them down. The lesson wasn't "power to the people." The lesson was that the rules change when you start winning. Your 401k is on autopilot, funneling money into this system every two weeks, helping inflate the very bubble that might eventually wipe it out. That's not an accident. That's the design. If any of this sounds like reason to pay attention, start at . Free toolkit, Luke's book, and a map out of this maze. Referenced: Rob Brayton PSC (YouTube channel) /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/40407960

What War Does To Your Wallet That The TV Won't Tell You | Between The Lies 028 03/06/2026

What War Does To Your Wallet That The TV Won't Tell You | Between The Lies 028 War. Who is it good for? If you answered "Raytheon shareholders and K Street lobbyists," congratulations, you're paying attention. This week on Between The Lies, Luke Tatum, Rob Brayton, and I dug into the economics of war and why the "war is good for the economy" argument is one of the most persistent lies in mainstream financial thinking. With another Middle Eastern conflict dominating headlines and defense stocks ticking up, it felt like the right moment to pull back the curtain. What We Cover: We start with Frederic Bastiat's broken window fallacy, the idea that destruction creates economic activity. Yes, technically. But every dollar funneled into Halliburton is a dollar that didn't go toward something durable, something generational, something actually useful. Rob makes the point that the best minds in academia get siphoned into defense industries because that's where the money is. What if that intellectual capital got redeployed into solving real problems instead? Luke breaks down why 1946, the year troops came home from World War II, was arguably the single greatest year for economic growth in U.S. history. Not because of government spending. Because private citizens came home, started companies, and got back to building wealth for themselves and their families. That's what actually drives an economy. We also get into the ethics of investing in defense contractors (Luke drops a technical point on how secondary market stock purchases actually work), the Pentagon's missing $1.8 trillion that apparently nobody can locate, and why DARPA's budget is basically a black hole with a government seal on it. The conclusion: war misallocates capital, destroys resources that could have compounded for generations, and benefits a very small group of people who are not you or me. If you want to protect yourself from the economic fallout of endless conflict, the answer isn't betting on Lockheed Martin, it's building your own financial infrastructure that governments and defense contracts can't touch. Your focus should stay where it belongs: your family, your community, the things you can actually control. Free toolkit with Luke's Amazon bestselling book and two video courses available at . Websites Referenced: /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/40347825

$1.8 Trillion in Private Credit Just Blinked: What Blue Owl Capital's Freeze Means for Your Money | Between The Lies 027 03/03/2026

$1.8 Trillion in Private Credit Just Blinked: What Blue Owl Capital's Freeze Means for Your Money | Between The Lies 027 Blue Owl Capital just told its investors "just kidding" about being able to get their money back. If you missed it, they halted redemptions on their private equity shares. Permanently. As in, you thought that was your money, but it turns out it was their money the whole time. Welcome to the world of non-depository financial institutions, what Luke calls NDFIs, what we call No Diffys. These are the places where an absolutely enormous amount of money lives that isn't sitting in any bank you've ever walked into. We're talking $1.8 trillion in private credit alone. And very little of anyone's money in this space comes with any actual guarantees. This week, Luke, Rob, and I break down what happened with Blue Owl Capital, why it matters way beyond just one fund, and why this rhymes a little too loudly with 2008 for our comfort. What We Get Into: Blue Owl Capital halts investor redemptions, what actually happened and why Dark pools: the SEC-regulated trading environments where billions move without public reporting Why Carlisle Group, KKR, Blackstone, Aries, and Apollo are all moving in the same direction The term "SIFI," Systemically Important Financial Institutions, or as I call it, too big to fail with better branding How the private banking system is literally twice the size of all public-facing bank deposits worldwide Why 46% of one Blue Owl fund being in tech/software stock is a problem if you think the AI bubble might be getting a little puffy Infinite banking as the private contract alternative that actually guarantees your access to your money The frustration here isn't just that one fund locked people out. It's that the system is designed so you don't get to know what's happening inside any of these black boxes until it's already affecting your money. Nobody reads their bank account agreement. Nobody understands that when you deposit money in a bank, legally, you're giving them a loan. The Dodd-Frank Act has some things to say about what happens to your money when things go sideways. We're not saying this is definitely 2008. We've heard that before and we're tired of crying wolf as much as anyone. What we are saying is that when it smells like something, it might be that thing. And when private institutions that promised liquidity start telling people they can't have their money back, it might be worth having a system where that can't happen to you. Free toolkit and Luke's Amazon bestselling book available at . Referenced: Reuters (Blue Owl Capital reporting) Dodd-Frank Act SEC (Securities Exchange Commission) /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/40292905

The IBC Mindset: Multi-Generational Wealth Without Epstein's Island | Between The Lies 026 02/21/2026

The IBC Mindset: Multi-Generational Wealth Without Epstein's Island | Between The Lies 026 Rob spent the weekend with some of the sharpest long-range thinkers in finance and came back with something worth unpacking. Welcome to Between The Lies, where Luke Tatum and Rob Brayton from Perfect Spiral Capital help me make sense of a world that keeps trying to pick your pocket while telling you it's doing you a favor. This week, Rob attended the annual Nelson Nash Institute Think Tank for the second time, and the theme hit different: think long range. What We Cover: What actually happens at the Nelson Nash Institute Think Tank and why it's nothing like a normal financial conference The difference between "planning for retirement" and planning five generations out David Stearns on Keynesian debt-based economics versus the Austrian individualist alternative How fractional reserve banking quietly siphons wealth upward while you're busy watching the market Why the infinite banking concept is a tool, not a moral statement, and why that matters Nelson Nash's number one rule: think long range, and what that actually looks like in practice How banks themselves use cash value life insurance as a tier-one asset (spoiler: they're not doing it for your benefit) Why accumulating capital changes the opportunities you see Key Insights: Luke explains something that sounds simple but rewires how you think: when you accumulate capital, opportunities come to you. Most people aren't well-capitalized. They're not even thinking in those terms. The infinite banking concept gives you the framework to build that foundation, and the discipline to keep it. Rob drives home what David Stearns laid out at the think tank: the dominant economic system is Keynesian, which is a polished way of saying debt-based with top-down control. The Austrian alternative puts the individual in charge, you finance what you need through your own system, and you're the one who profits from it. Nobody here had to make any shady deals to get a seat at the table. That's kind of the whole point. The Bigger Picture: When banks hold trillions in cash value life insurance as their most stable asset, and you're still waiting for permission from the same institutions to access your own money, something's off. The infinite banking concept exists to fix that imbalance at the individual level. Nelson Nash's book, Becoming Your Own Banker, is still frequently a top-selling retirement book on Amazon. Short, readable, worth rereading every year. If you're working with Perfect Spiral Capital and you want to attend a future think tank, reach out to Luke or Rob. If you're not working with them yet, that's what the free toolkit is for. Websites Referenced: Nelson Nash Institute () /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/40182920

Kevin Warsh Fed Chair Appointment: Morgan Stanley's Yes Man for Trump's Rate Cuts | Between The Lies 025 02/15/2026

Kevin Warsh Fed Chair Appointment: Morgan Stanley's Yes Man for Trump's Rate Cuts | Between The Lies 025 As we prepare for the Fed to change leadership, I'm reminded that Trump might be the worst person in the world at making political appointments. Welcome to Episode 025 of Between The Lies, where Luke Tatum and Rob Brayton from Perfect Spiral Capital help me understand why Kevin Warsh - Trump's likely pick to replace Jerome Powell as Fed Chair - represents everything wrong with our monetary system. Here's what bothers me most about this whole situation: Warsh is as conventional and Morgan Stanley as you can possibly get. He's the definition of a yes man who will do exactly what Trump wants - cut rates to make numbers go up - without any concern for what that actually does to your purchasing power. Luke and Rob break down the fundamental problem with our entire approach to monetary policy. The Fed shouldn't exist at all, but since it does, having someone who will just rubber-stamp whatever the president wants is even worse than having an independent incompetent. Trump's economic philosophy seems to be "does that make number go up? Okay, let's do that." He's not an economist. He's the opposite of an economist. And now he's appointing someone who believes AI will magically solve all our inflation problems while simultaneously advocating for lower interest rates. Has anyone noticed how much PC components cost lately? Has anyone looked at electricity prices? No? We're just gonna focus on this one metric and pat ourselves on the back? Rob explained something that perfectly captures the absurdity: You can't support farmers without affecting auto workers. You can't prop up Wall Street without consequences for Main Street. Every intervention creates ripple effects across the entire economy. But Warsh and Trump don't care about that because they're only looking at one thing. The silver lining, according to Luke, is that this doesn't really affect people who've positioned themselves outside the traditional banking system. When you're operating with properly structured whole life insurance through infinite banking, you're not worried about what the Fed does with interest rates. You have consistent, reliable compounding growth regardless of their manipulation. Luke uses his policy primarily for income taxes and insurance premiums. Rob finances everything from property taxes to Bitcoin purchases through his system. They're capturing transactions within their own banking system instead of begging some institution for permission every time they need capital. That's the mindset shift that changes everything. The Fed is gonna do what the Fed is gonna do. You can either spend your time worrying about Kevin Warsh's appointments and Jerome Powell's decisions, or you can build systems that work regardless of their incompetence. We're living in this weird situation where the US economy looks like a jalopy, but when every other country has two broken legs, being the kid with just a broken arm isn't so bad. Ready to build your own economic foundation that doesn't depend on Fed chairs making good decisions? Check out for their free toolkit. Websites Referenced: /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/40112735

Gold and Silver All-Time Highs Signal Dollar Debasement: Sound Money V The Fed | Between The Lies 024 02/09/2026

Gold and Silver All-Time Highs Signal Dollar Debasement: Sound Money V The Fed | Between The Lies 024 Silver and gold going up simultaneously should tell you something about your dollar. Nothing good to my mind. Welcome to Between The Lies, where Luke Tatum and Rob Brayton from Perfect Spiral Capital help me understand what it means when precious metals hit all-time highs while everyone's celebrating stock market records. Spoiler: It's not about gold getting more valuable. What We Cover: Gresham's Law explained: Bad money drives out good money Basel III banking regulations forcing banks to hold physical gold/silver as tier one assets Why JPMorgan Chase paid $920 million for silver price manipulation (and still made a profit) Japan's yen carry trade unwinding and what happens when free money disappears The difference between gold as insurance versus gold as speculation Why selling gold at all-time highs just gives you more worthless dollars Nvidia's 14% dominance of the S&P 500 and what that means for market stability Key Insights: Rob breaks down something most people miss about precious metals. Gold and silver aren't investment vehicles - they're insurance against currency debasement. The price going up doesn't mean gold's worth more. It means the dollar's worth less. Luke returns after missing a few episodes with perspective on the carry trade situation. When institutional investors can borrow Japanese yen at essentially 0% and invest it in US bonds at 3%, that's easy money. But when the Bank of Japan raises rates even a quarter point above zero, those entire schemes unwind. And who gets hurt? Not the institutions. The Basel III discussion reveals why global banks are suddenly loading up on physical gold. Banking regulations now classify physical precious metals as tier one assets that can be leveraged at full value. Paper gold and silver? Penalized. So institutions are unwinding paper positions and taking physical delivery. The Reality Check: When I see gold and silver both ripping higher, my first thought isn't "time to buy precious metals." It's "what's happening to my dollar that both of these are moving?" Rob emphasizes this perfectly: You don't think of precious metals in dollar terms. You think of them as stores of value. So when the "price" goes up, that's just the mirror reflecting currency erosion. Luke shares something that stuck with me - if you sell your gold right now at these highs, you just have a lot of dollars. Which are going down in value. That's the whole reason gold went up in the first place. Perfect Spiral Capital Insight: Rob's been researching the M2 money supply, banking regulations, and institutional movements. Every dollar being printed deflates every other dollar already out there. That's math, not opinion. Luke points out we don't have the influence to move markets. You, me, everyone I've ever met could form a club and all buy or sell gold simultaneously. We still wouldn't move the price. But when Citi, Chase, and global institutions shift their asset allocations into physical precious metals? That moves prices. The conversation ends with a sobering thought about AI speculation and Nvidia's market dominance. If that bubble pops, we're not talking about a 10% correction. We're talking potential depression territory given how heavily invested major companies are. But here's the empowering part: Once you understand these patterns, you stop reacting emotionally to price movements and start positioning for what's actually happening. Websites Referenced: /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/40041755

Boomer Home Equity Crisis: Why Housing Prices Must Fall for America to Recover | Between The Lies 023 01/31/2026

Boomer Home Equity Crisis: Why Housing Prices Must Fall for America to Recover | Between The Lies 023 Trump's team announced you might be able to raid your 401k for a down payment on a house. Sounds like IBC at first glance, right? Not even close. Welcome to Between The Lies, where Rob Brayton from Perfect Spiral Capital helps me understand why government solutions to government-created problems always make things worse. This week we're tackling Kevin Hassett's proposal to let people withdraw 401k funds for home purchases, and why it's actually a desperation play disguised as help. What We Cover: Why withdrawing from your 401k kills your future earning capacity permanently The fundamental difference between removing capital and borrowing against capital with IBC How 401ks are a government solution to a government-created problem (taxation) The retirement myth: Why this modern concept might die with the boomers Sound money solutions versus endless government interventions Why housing unaffordability traces back to monetary policy, not down payment access Boomer home equity: What happens when the largest generation exits the market The political impossibility of real housing solutions Key Insights: Rob breaks down the mechanics most people miss. With 401k withdrawals, you're permanently removing capital that was compounding for your future. With infinite banking, you're borrowing the insurance company's money against your cash value while your policy continues earning. Same surface idea, completely different outcomes. We also tackle the uncomfortable truth: Trump knows how to fix housing. Every administration does. They won't do it because the real fix wipes out boomer home equity, which is where most Americans store their net worth. No politician will run on "your parents' house is worth less now." The conversation gets philosophical when we challenge the retirement concept itself. This idea of a permanent vacation after 65 barely existed before boomers. The statistics on people dying shortly after retirement because they have nothing to live for are sobering. Maybe the whole framework is broken. The Silver Lining: Henry Hazlitt's "Economics in One Lesson" reminds us these patterns repeat because people keep expecting different results from the same interventions. Once you understand the game, you stop playing by their rules and start building systems they can't touch. Rob emphasizes creating stable assets in your own portfolio that allow you to weather whatever storm comes. Whether housing crashes or inflates further, the goal is coming out the other side with something rather than hoping politicians make the right calls. Perfect Spiral Capital Insight: When your 401k is the only tool they give you, of course people will use it for immediate needs. The alternative is building systems where capital is always accessible without destroying future compounding. That's what infinite banking provides that government programs never will. Ready to build real wealth instead of raiding retirement accounts? Visit for the free toolkit. Websites Referenced: Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt (recommended reading) Becoming Your Own Banker by Nelson Nash (referenced) /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/39944030

Visa, Mastercard, and the Coming Credit Crunch: Why Rate Caps Could Backfire | Between The Lies 022 01/26/2026

Visa, Mastercard, and the Coming Credit Crunch: Why Rate Caps Could Backfire | Between The Lies 022 I heard a rumor that Trump wants to cap credit card rates at 10%. Personally, I was just thinking it's already too easy to move up economically in America. Not like we have an unaffordability crisis constantly making headlines or anything. Welcome to another episode where Rob Brayton from Perfect Spiral Capital and I break down another government solution that's likely to create more problems than it solves. Spoiler alert: When you cap what lenders can charge for risk, they just stop lending to risky people. What We Cover: Why credit card rate caps mean fewer people get credit, not cheaper credit The Big Short connection: How Wall Street just invents new financial products when you regulate the old ones Rob's breakdown of what happens when a 400 credit score and 850 credit score get treated the same Why this is probably negotiating theater rather than actual policy The return of secured credit cards and why that's worse than high rates Wall Street's morning panic versus end-of-day reality check How Bitcoin and policy loans could fill the gap if traditional credit disappears Key Insights: Rob nails the fundamental problem: if it was YOUR $10,000 on the line, would you lend it to someone and cap your return at 4%? Of course not. These companies aren't going to willingly lose money. They'll either stop lending to anyone below stellar credit or invent some new financial product that technically isn't a "credit card" but functions the same way with different rules. We've seen this playbook before. Remember The Big Short when Michael Burry walks in wanting a financial product that doesn't exist? Wall Street just invents credit default swaps on the spot. Same thing will happen here. You decree this thing called a "credit card" can't charge more than 10%? Fine. Here's a new thing called a "flexible spending arrangement" that does exactly what credit cards used to do. The Real Talk: Yes, credit card rates are insanely high. Rob has over an 800 credit score and still gets quoted 15-16% on his card. But the solution isn't price controls that eliminate options for people who need them most. The payday loan crowd everyone loves to hate? Those people need money and don't have it. Sometimes you find yourself in a situation where you just need a hand up, and you may not look good enough on paper to qualify under strict risk caps. The Silver Lining: This kind of credit crunch could actually push more people toward Bitcoin and private banking solutions. If you have assets, why wouldn't you lend against those instead of begging traditional banks for permission? Websites Referenced: /episode/index/show/818e9092-8b3a-44f1-be2a-98ebebbdb7a5/id/39875725

Between the Lies Podcast

TOPICS