Respecting Religion
What's at stake for faith freedom for all in our world today? Join the conversation on religion and the law, including the most significant cases concerning religion and religious liberty at the U.S. Supreme Court and the continuing impact of Christian nationalism. As lawyers and people of faith, BJC Executive Director Amanda Tyler and General Counsel Holly Hollman think these topics deserve respectful conversation -- something that we don’t always hear in the public square or our social media feeds.
info_outline
S5, Ep. 28: Conscience protections in SCOTUS abortion cases
05/09/2024
S5, Ep. 28: Conscience protections in SCOTUS abortion cases
How do religion and religious freedom arguments interact with cases about abortion access? The legal landscape here is beyond complex, and in this episode, Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman look at how conscience protections were discussed in two recent Supreme Court cases about abortion. There is a deepening religion and policy conversation in our country, and they discuss how that conversation is reflected in these oral arguments – from Church Amendments to the doctrine of preemption. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): U.S. Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine Amanda and Holly discussed state laws after the Dobbs decision two weeks ago – in episode 26 of season 5: Learn more about the Arizona legislature’s repeal of the 1864 law in this article by Stacey Barchenger and Ray Stern in the Arizona Republic: Learn more about the 6-week ban on abortions in Florida in this article by Stephanie Colombini for NPR: We played a series of clips from the oral arguments in U.S. Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, which the Supreme Court heard on March 26, 2024. You can hear the audio . The clips we played featured: Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar (from 00:00:48 into the arguments) Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar (from 00:28:31 into the arguments) Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar (from 00:29:11 into the argument) Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Attorney Erin Hawley (from 01:16:40 into the argument) Read an overview of conscience protections from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Segment 2 (starting at 19:26): Moyle v. United States Moyle v. United States is a consolidated case with Idaho v. United States. “EMTALA” stands for “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act.” Read what the American Medical Association says about the case and EMTALA . We played a series of clips from the oral arguments in Moyle v. United States, which the Supreme Court heard on April 24, 2024. You can hear the audio . The clips we played featured: Justice Elena Kagan and Attorney Joshua Turner (from 00:06:09 into the argument) Attorney Joshua Turner and Justice Elena Kagan (from 00:08:02 into the argument) Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Attorney Joshua Turner (from 00:23:54 into the argument) Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Attorney Joshua Turner (from 00:48:43 into the argument) Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/31213037
info_outline
S5, Ep. 27: 100 episodes and 100,000 downloads
05/02/2024
S5, Ep. 27: 100 episodes and 100,000 downloads
For the 100th episode of Respecting Religion, Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman answer listener questions, ranging from the law surrounding the tax-exempt status of religious institutions to their favorite Supreme Court justices. They also look at some of the big Supreme Court decisions and the shifts on the Court since this podcast began four years ago, sharing some of their favorite and most impactful episodes. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): How did we get to 100 episodes? The podcast series on the dangers of Christian nationalism ran in 2019, and it’s available on the , and you can see all of the episodes of the Christians Against Christian Nationalism website. Holly and Amanda mentioned some of their favorite episodes, including: You can see a list of every single episode at Segment 2 (starting at 19:06): Questions on tax-exempt status, tough conversations, and more Holly mentioned the 1983 case of Bob Jones University v. United States. You can read the decision . For more about the Respect for Marriage Act, check out episode 7 from season 4: For more on the Johnson Amendment and the way it protects churches and other groups who are eligible for the 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, visit . Amanda and Holly also discussed it a bit on episode 4 of season 2: . Holly mentioned episode 6 from season 3: . Segment 3 (starting at 34:07): Questions on podcast recommendations, favorite Supreme Court justices, and more The podcasts mentioned by Amanda and Holly were: Amanda and Holly discussed being interns at BJC. The internship program is ongoing – learn more about the opportunities by visiting Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/31088568
info_outline
S5, Ep. 26: Archaic laws and new theories emerge from state abortion debates
04/25/2024
S5, Ep. 26: Archaic laws and new theories emerge from state abortion debates
The intersection of abortion and religion often grabs headlines, and this episode of Respecting Religion looks at recent developments in two states: Arizona and Indiana. Amanda and Holly discuss an Indiana case that involves free exercise arguments under state law to support abortion, and they examine the impact of Arizona’s 1864 law that criminalizes abortion. Both situations are resulting from the tremendous change in the law after the Dobbs decision in 2022, leading to some unexpected situations. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): The Arizona situation Our next episode will be our 100th episode! It’s your chance to ask Amanda and Holly anything – send in your questions by April 29 to . Amanda and Holly previously discussed the aftermath of the Dobbs decision in , released in October 2022. The show was titled “A religious freedom right to an abortion?” The New York Times has that shows the differences in the laws regarding abortion in states across the country. Amanda and Holly mentioned this article for Vox written by Nicole Naera: After we recorded this program, the Arizona House voted to repeal the 1864 law, and the Arizona Senate is expected to vote on it next week. Read more in by Caroline Kitchener and Yvonne Wingett Sanchez. Segment 2 (starting at 12:12): The Indiana litigation For a more in-depth discussion of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), check out episode 6 of season 5: . Read the opinion from the Indiana Appeals Court and the concurrence . Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/30982953
info_outline
S5, Ep. 25: The crisis in teaching constitutional law
04/18/2024
S5, Ep. 25: The crisis in teaching constitutional law
Some troubling trends at the Supreme Court are starting to affect the legal profession and how students in law school approach the U.S. Constitution. As SCOTUS continues to upend decades of established precedent in church-state law, Amanda and Holly discuss what’s changed since they were in law school and the rapid changes in church-state law itself. They look at the views of legitimacy of the Court, and Holly shares specifically what she sees in her work teaching church-state law at Georgetown University Law Center. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 01:15): Respect for the Supreme Court in law school Read “,” an opinion piece by Jesse Wegman for The New York Times. Holly mentioned recent episodes of Respecting Religion that covered: Religious accommodation in the workplace ( on Groff v. DeJoy) The funding of private religious schools with government funds ( on Carson v. Makin) Prayer by a coach on the 50-yard-line ( of season 3 on Kennedy v. Bremerton) Amanda mentioned the book by H.W. Perry. Segment 2 (starting at 10:51): Turning points, hypocrisy, and partisan muscle Holy mentioned how SCOTUS uses history and tradition and the case of Greece v. Galloway, which we covered in . Segment 3 (starting at 21:26): The differences in the Souter/Stevens/O’Connor era and what it’s like in the classroom today To read more about the Supreme Court religious liberty cases involving Jehovah’s Witnesses, by Jane G. Rainey published by the Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University. Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/30884048
info_outline
S5, Ep. 24: Race, religion and citizenship
04/11/2024
S5, Ep. 24: Race, religion and citizenship
Hear excerpts from a special event we organized at the University of Southern California on race, religion and citizenship in this episode of Respecting Religion. The Rev. Dr. Joseph Evans and the Rev. Dr. Christopher The brought their unique experiences and expertise to a conversation on religious and racial identity, moderated by the Rev. Dr. Najuma Smith-Pollard. Hear their insights about a theology of democracy, their experiences with racism, how to identify authoritarianism, and what lessons Scripture has for our current climate. Segment 1 (starting at 00:35): The event on race, religion and citizenship The and the were the speakers for this year’s edition of our annual Walter B. and Kay W. Shurden Lectures, titled “Whose country is it anyway?” held April 2 on the campus of the University of Southern California. Their conversation was moderated by the Rev. . Click on each name to read more about them and their impressive credentials. Listen to the entire program . The event was in partnership with USC’s Office of Religious & Spiritual Life, the USC Center for Religion and Civic Culture, and Berkeley School of Theology. Learn more about BJC’s annual series at. Segment 2 (starting at 1:45): A theology of democracy, experiences of racism, and a new understanding of The New Colossus Rev. Dr. The mentioned “warmth of other suns,” giving credit to how Isabel Wilkerson uses the phrase. She is the author of the book . Rev. Dr. The mentioned “The New Colossus,” the poem by Emma Lazarus that is inscribed on a plaque in the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty. You can read it . Segment 3 (starting at 12:29): Authoritarianism and lessons from Scripture Rev. Dr. Evans mentioned Walter Wink, a theologian who discussed how power structures resist our need for transformation. Learn more about him in . Segment 4 (starting at 18:27): Politics and access to power Dr. Catherine Brekus delivered the 2023 Walter B. and Kay W. Shurden Lecture, which focused on the myth of American “chosenness.” Hear it in of season 4, and listen to the panel that followed it on . Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/30786053
info_outline
S5, Ep. 23: The Bible doesn’t need Trump’s endorsement
04/04/2024
S5, Ep. 23: The Bible doesn’t need Trump’s endorsement
When former President Donald Trump announced during Holy Week that he was endorsing the “God Bless the USA” Bible, the reaction was swift. But, beyond the punchlines and the obvious concerns, Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman discuss why the video is concerning to our current political moment and the continued rise of Christian nationalism. Not all examples are this obvious – what does this mean to those important conversations? Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): Why is this a problem? The New York Times has more about the video and the marketing in this article by By Michael Gold and Maggie Haberman: Segment 2 (starting at 08:11): Reacting to the video pitch You can watch the video endorsing the Bible on YouTube. Amanda and Holly talked about using the Bible as a prop and the idea of “divinely inspired” founding documents in episode 21 of this season, titled Dr. Jemar Tisby shared about how he and other authors worked to stop an earlier version of this Bible in an article on his Substack: Segment 3 (starting at 26:44): Understanding how this is part of a larger political strategy Holly read from this piece by Michael C. Bender in The New York Times: Amanda discussed her experience attending the ReAwaken America tour in . Amanda read from this piece by David French in The New York Times: Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/30680138
info_outline
S5, Ep. 22: Spring break and religious holidays
03/28/2024
S5, Ep. 22: Spring break and religious holidays
There are many religious holidays in the spring, but not all are given the same public acknowledgment – from government-sponsored events to time off from school and work. Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman discuss how Christian privilege shows up in how our country recognizes and accommodates certain holidays, as well as how holidays help us understand and celebrate the religious pluralism in our country. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): The March Madness of spring break and public school holidays Access “A Parent’s Guide to Religion in Public Schools” published decades ago by the National PTA and the First Amendment Center with funding from the Freedom Forum . Segment 2 (starting at 15:05): Religious holidays and public officials/elected leaders Read about Dr. Anthea Butler’s experience at the White House St. Patrick’s Day celebration in on her Substack. Segment 3 (starting at 24:00): Reflections on Christian privilege Amanda mentioned her forthcoming book, How to End Christian Nationalism. It releases October 22, and it is available for preorder at . Read the story by Kevin Reynolds in the Salt Lake Tribune discussing Muslim players fasting during March Madness, which coincides with Ramadan: Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/30580098
info_outline
S5, Ep. 21: But … is it Christian nationalism?
03/21/2024
S5, Ep. 21: But … is it Christian nationalism?
Is an American flag in a church sanctuary an example of Christian nationalism? What about faith-based advocacy? Helping voters get to the polls? Saying the Constitution is “divinely inspired”? Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman answer some common questions they hear about Christian nationalism, and they talk about the questions we should be asking ourselves. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): What does it mean to determine the level of Christian nationalism? Learn more about the Christians Against Christian Nationalism campaign, including the statement of principles, at . If you are a Christian who agrees with the statement, we encourage you to ! Segment 2 (starting at 08:23): Answering some political questions about Christian nationalism Amanda mentioned this recent op-ed by David French in The New York Times: to access the report on Christian nationalism and the January 6 insurrection from BJC and the Freedom From Religion Foundation. Amanda mentioned this article by Steven Monacelli for the Daily Dot: Hear Amanda and Holly’s reaction to President Trump’s 2020 appearance at St. John’s Church with a Bible in episode 15 of our first season: Segment 3 (starting at 29:09): Answering some church-related questions about Christian nationalism Read about the new survey results from PRRI on the support for Christian nationalism . To learn more about Patriot Churches, read this 2020 article in The Washington Post by Sarah Pulliam Bailey: Segment 4 (starting at 38:54): History and civics questions about Christian nationalism Amanda and Holly spoke about some lawmakers sharing the idea that the Constitution is “divinely inspired” in episode 10 of season 4: Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/30477248
info_outline
S5, Ep. 20: Attending the State of the Union
03/14/2024
S5, Ep. 20: Attending the State of the Union
Get a first-hand account of attending the State of the Union address on this episode. Amanda Tyler talks with Holly Hollman about her experience, providing a new way to think about who represents our country in the room during the president’s address. She shares about her invitation and various discussions with members of Congress about Christian nationalism. Plus, if you’ve ever wondered what it’s like to serve your country by working at a polling place on Election Day, hear about Amanda’s experience in Texas and how you can do the same, helping to ensure free and fair elections for our representatives in D.C. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): The cost of speaking out against Christian nationalism Amanda mentioned this article by Jack Jenkins for Religion News Service: published by BJC and the Freedom From Religion Foundation on Christian nationalism and the January 6, insurrection. to watch Rep. Jared Huffman’s floor speech on the dangers of Christian nationalism, which mentions the joint report. Hear Amanda’s conversation with Rob Reiner and Dan Partland on their film “God & Country” in of this season of Respecting Religion Segment 2 (starting at 08:44): Attending the State of the Union address Amanda and Rep. Jared Huffman filmed a video together before they went to the State of the Union address. You can . Amanda and Holly discussed the Alabama ruling impacting IVF treatments in the state on of this season of Respecting Religion. Segment 3 (starting at 30:23): Serving as an election worker Holly spoke with Chris Crawford of Protect Democracy about ways people of faith can be involved in free and fair elections on of this season of Respecting Religion. Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/30373708
info_outline
S5, Ep. 19: Still smarting over Obergefell, Justice Alito calls for a new case
03/07/2024
S5, Ep. 19: Still smarting over Obergefell, Justice Alito calls for a new case
The Supreme Court declines to hear thousands of cases a year, but one recent denial included a troubling statement from Justice Samuel Alito. Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman look at a case out of Missouri about potential jurors being struck from the jury pool because of their anti-LGBTQ beliefs, and they break down Justice Alito’s 5-page statement that seems to be asking for another case with the same issue at stake. What could this mean for the future, and why is Justice Alito still hung up on the Obergefell v. Hodges decision from 2015? SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): What happened in this case? Holly mentioned this resource from The Washington Post that shows an update on cases as the term progresses: Amanda and Holly discussed Donald Trump’s plan to create a task force fighting anti-Christian bias in episode 13 of this current season Amanda read from this article in The New York Times by Abbie VanSickle describing the factual background of the lawsuit: Segment 2 (starting at 14:33): Why did Justice Alito write this statement? You can read Justice Alito’s statement on the denial of cert on page 25 of the order list from the Supreme Court on Feb. 20, 2024. Amanda mentioned three cases invoked by Justice Alito: (2017) (1993) (2022) Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/30270893
info_outline
S5, Ep. 18: A chief justice or chief theologian for Alabama?
02/29/2024
S5, Ep. 18: A chief justice or chief theologian for Alabama?
An alarming ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court is leading to the shutdown of in vitro fertilization clinics, and the concurrence’s use of Scripture and Christian theology is causing additional concerns. Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman look at this troubling ruling, the various religious views on life, and why it’s an issue for a justice to cite the Bible in an opinion. SHOW NOTES: Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): What is the Alabama case about? The Alabama Supreme Court case is called LePage v. Center for Reproductive Medicine. You can read the decision and the concurrence . For additional information on the case, listen to the NPR interview with law professor Mary Ziegler in this story: Amanda and Holly discussed the Dobbs decision in . Segment 2 (starting at 13:18): The decision and even more-troubling concurrence Listen to the “On the Media” interview with Matthew D. Taylor: Amanda talked about her experience at the ReAwaken America tour in of Respecting Religion. Segment 3 (starting at 31:15): Additional reactions to the opinion Read the entire piece by Noah Feldman for Bloomberg at this link: Amanda and Holly discussed the Kennedy v. Bremerton decision in . Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/30167828
info_outline
S5, Ep. 17: The presidency and Christian nationalism
02/22/2024
S5, Ep. 17: The presidency and Christian nationalism
Presidents have made broad appeals to our country without dividing along religious belief throughout American history. Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman look at presidential leadership and talk about how our country’s founding documents set up our system of government that does not create a “Christian nation” in any sort of legal sense – rather, it ensures freedom of religion and freedom from a state establishment of religion. They also talk about why people like to claim we are a “Christian nation” and the reasons that is a problematic statement. Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): Religious freedom at the founding Learn more about the celebration of the holiday known as Washington’s Birthday . Amanda and Holly mentioned this article by Peter Smith for the Associated Press: . He also wrote . Amanda mentioned a book she is writing that will come out later this year, which is titled . Watch Holly’s video answering the question “Is America a Christian nation?” . The Rev. Jennifer Hawks wrote this piece about Article VI for Baptist News Global: Amanda spoke with historian Steven Green in 2019 for this episode of our podcast series on the dangers of Christian nationalism: Michael Meyerson is the author of . You can read more about his 2014 lectures – given for the Walter B. and Kay W. Shurden Lectures on Religious Liberty and the Separation of Church and State – . The BJC Fellows Program is open to all young professionals interested in deepening their historical, legal and theological understanding of religious liberty. The deadline to apply for the 2024 class is March 1 – visit to learn more and apply. Segment 2 (starting at 24:21): Words from previous presidents to visit BJC’s website page with a few quotes from Founders, presidents, and Baptists about the relationship between church and state. The quotes include links or citations to the original source material. Segment 3 (starting at 33:20): What now? Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/30066918
info_outline
S5, Ep. 16: The trouble with *religious* charter schools
02/15/2024
S5, Ep. 16: The trouble with *religious* charter schools
There is a novel – and concerning – development in public education and the relationship between the institutions of church and state: Oklahoma and Guam have proposed religious charter schools. Litigation has already started. But, what is a religious charter school, and why is the idea such a problem? Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman say they are illegal and that they challenge some basic assumptions. Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): What are religious charter schools, and what’s the problem? Holly and Amanda discussed the trouble with school vouchers in and of this season. In an order on his way out the door, former Oklahoma Attorney General John O’Connor issued an opinion that said religious charter schools were ok, but then new Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond reversed that guidance. Read Don Byrd’s article for BJC’s website about the Oklahoma and Guam charter schools: Segment 2 (starting at 12:39): The lawsuits in Oklahoma trying to stop this action You can download the petition for the lawsuit by Oklahoma Attorney General Genter Drummond in the Oklahoma Supreme Court at on the website of the Oklahoma State Courts Network. The lawsuit brought by the ACLU, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and others is called OKPLAC, Inc. v. Statewide Virtual Charter School Board. Read the Complaint and learn more on the websites of and of . OKPLAC is the “Oklahoma Parent Legislative Advocacy Coalition.” Segment 3 (starting at 18:43): State and constitutional questions about charter schools from the U.S. Department of Education to learn more about charter schools. The trinity of recent Supreme Court cases mentioned were: (2017) (2020) (2022) Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/29969893
info_outline
S5, Ep. 15: Black America’s changing religious landscape
02/08/2024
S5, Ep. 15: Black America’s changing religious landscape
Much is said and assumed about the religious landscape of Black America, but it’s more diverse than the common narratives. Holly Hollman speaks with Dr. Sabrina E. Dent and Dr. Anthony Pinn about misconceptions and how they brought together Black Church leaders and Black nontheists for key conversations. Tune in for this open and honest conversation about how we can work across racial and religious lines to help all communities thrive. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:35): Misconceptions about the religious landscape of Black America Dr. Anthony Pinn is the Agnes Cullen Arnold Professor of Humanities at Rice University, and he’s also the Founding Director of Rice’s . He is the author/editor of more than 35 books, and he is also director of research for the . Read Dr. Pinn’s full biography . Dr. Sabrina E. Dent is the director of the BJC Center for Faith, Justice and Reconciliation, which is the home of our project on Race and Religious Freedom. Learn more about the Center and . She is the editor and contributing author of the book . Read Dr. Dent’s full biography . “(Dis)belief: Reimagining the Religious Landscape of Black America” was the topic for the 2023 Religious Freedom Mobile Institute. in a piece by Jaziah Masters, Research Fellow for the BJC Center for Faith, Justice and Reconciliation. Segment 2 (starting at 20:13): The connections between religious freedom and racial justice BJC’s “Religious Freedom Has Been White Too Long: Voices of Black Scholars” was BJC’s 2021 lecture featuring Dr. Anthony Pinn, Dr. Nicole Myers Turner, Dr. Teresa L. Smallwood, and Dr. David Goatley. Watch the event and read a recap . James Baldwin wrote in , that the bulk of the country’s white population is beyond hope of moral rehabilitation. “They have been white, if I may so put it, too long.” Segment 3 (starting at 30:23): Key moments from the conference As mentioned, Dr. Dent and Dr. Pinn will be co-editors of a forthcoming book of essays from the participants in the conference. Keep up with BJC and the BJC Center for Faith, Justice and Reconciliation for the latest! Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/29858543
info_outline
S5, Ep. 14: Faith in elections
02/01/2024
S5, Ep. 14: Faith in elections
What is the role of churches and other houses of worship in protecting democracy? This topic usually comes up because of bad actors that overstep into partisanship, but today’s show looks at how faith communities can help our elections run smoothly. Holly Hollman speaks with Chris Crawford of Protect Democracy – a nonprofit, cross-ideological organization that has a new playbook to help faith communities ensure “all eligible voters can access a ballot and every valid vote is counted.” Learn more about how people of faith can love their neighbors and take active roles in protecting our system of government. SHOW NOTES: Segment 1 (starting at 00:45): Working across differences without papering over them Read more about Chris Crawford . Protect Democracy and Interfaith America partnered to help faith communities to serve their communities during the 2024 election. , and learn more about Protect Democracy . Protect Democracy’s guide for recognizing authoritarianism is . Segment 2 (starting at 11:49): The Faith in Elections Playbook Chris Crawford mentioned A More Perfect Union: The Jewish Partnership for Democracy. Learn more about their work . Chris Crawford mentioned as a resource to learn more about being a poll worker. Segment 3 (starting at 31:03): Religious freedom and protecting our democracy Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/29750753
info_outline
S5, Ep. 13: ‘God Made Trump,’ Biden campaigns at a church, and more news from the campaign trail
01/25/2024
S5, Ep. 13: ‘God Made Trump,’ Biden campaigns at a church, and more news from the campaign trail
Now that the first votes have been cast in the presidential primaries, Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman look at some of the troubling statements and activities on the campaign trail concerning the role of religion and religious freedom – from both Democrats and Republicans. While candidates are – and should be – free to talk about the ways their faith inspires them, there are some red lines when it comes to politicking in houses of worship with tax-exempt resources or using political power as a way to impose religion on others. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): What makes someone “religious” according to voters? Amanda and Holly mentioned the following articles: by By Dan Keating, Adrian Blanco and Clara Ence Morse for The Washington Post By Ruth Graham and Charles Homans for The New York Times by Samuel Benson for Deseret News by Guthrie Graves-Fitzsimmons for MSNBC.com. It includes a link to the “God Made Trump” campaign video Amanda and Holly discussed the “God Made a Fighter” video for the 2022 gubernatorial campaign of Ron DeSantis in episode 6 of season 4: . Amanda and Holly discussed the ReAwaken America tour in . Read more about Speaker Mike Johnson and Steve Bannon debating “God’s will” in this article by Mark Wingfield for Baptist News Global: Segment 2 (starting at 23:05): A war on Christians? Trump’s promises if he returns to office Holly mentioned this piece by Meryl Kornfield, Colby Itkowitz, Hannah Knowles and Marianne LeVine for The Washington Post: Read more about former President Donald Trump’s promises if he returns to office in this pice by Sarah Posner for MSNBC.com: Segment 3 (starting at 31:47): President Biden at Mother Emanuel Church Amanda mentioned this piece by Ken Macon for MSNBC.com on President Biden’s appearance at Mother Emanuel AME Church: BJC has a one-page explainer of how houses of worship and other religious nonprofits can how to use their prophetic voice in the political process while maintaining their 501(c)(3) tax status. , called “Advocates, not partisans.” Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/29646198
info_outline
S5, Ep. 12: Rob Reiner and ‘God & Country’ director Dan Partland
01/18/2024
S5, Ep. 12: Rob Reiner and ‘God & Country’ director Dan Partland
What is the cost of speaking out against Christian nationalism? In this episode, Amanda Tyler talks with Rob Reiner and Dan Partland, two people behind a new film that discusses the dangers of Christian nationalism to the country, to the faith, and to pluralism. They share candidly about what they learned while making “God & Country,” the cost for Christians who are speaking out against the political ideology, and what new conversations they are hoping to create with this film. SHOW NOTESSegment 1 (starting at 00:35): Rob Reiner and Dan Partland on Christian nationalism “God & Country” will be in theaters on February 16. Learn more at . The phrase “separation of church and state” is not in the U.S. Constitution, but the concept is laid out several times, including Article VI’s prohibition on any religious test for office, the First Amendment’s prohibition of a government establishment of religion, and the First Amendment’s guarantee of the free exercise of religion. Read more in Brent Walker’s “.” Learn more about the Christians Against Christian Nationalism campaign – a project BJC began in 2019 – by visiting . Segment 2 (starting at 20:58): Post-screening Q&A with Partland and Reiner BJC and the Freedom From Religion Foundation released a comprehensive report on the role of Christian nationalism in the January 6 attack on the Capitol. You can . Dan Partland mentioned , a book by Katherine Stewart on the rise of religious nationalism. It serves as a basis for the movie. Segment 3 (starting at 41:18): Closing Michelle Boorstein covered the screening for The Washington Post in this article: Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/29544913
info_outline
S5, Ep. 11: The first celebration of MLK Day
01/11/2024
S5, Ep. 11: The first celebration of MLK Day
In honor of Martin Luther King Jr. Day, we look back at the history of the holiday and the international context at the time of its first official celebration. On today’s podcast, hear from Coretta Scott King, speaking just months after the country’s first commemoration of the holiday in 1986. After Dr. King’s assassination in 1968, she led the charge to establish her husband’s birthday as a national holiday. In this presentation, Mrs. King talks about the first celebration, plans for future celebrations, and some of her work promoting peace and freedom around the world. Segment 1 (starting at 00:36): The first and second celebration of Martin Luther King Jr. Day Mrs. Coretta Scott King’s speech is from BJC’s 20th National Religious Liberty Conference, held in October 1986. Read the biography of Coretta Scott King on the website of the King Center . The theme for the 2024 King Holiday Observance is ‘Shifting the Cultural Climate through the Study and Practice of Kingian Nonviolence.’ to learn more, including a list of different ways you can honor the day. The Progressive National Baptist Convention was the denominational home of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Read more about their history on their website. “The King Center” is the name commonly used for the , which was established by Mrs. King in 1968. Segment 2 (starting at 06:18): International work for nonviolence Segment 3 (starting at 18:09): Hopes and plans for future celebrations Segment 4 (starting at 23:26): Closing to listen to a presentation from former Rep. Barbara Jordan during this same 1986 event, which we presented in episode 7 of this season. Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/29443293
info_outline
S5, Ep. 10: The church-state legacy of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor
12/21/2023
S5, Ep. 10: The church-state legacy of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor showed a thoughtful approach toward religious liberty issues during her time on the bench, upholding both the Free Exercise Clause and the Establishment Clause. Paying tribute to her soon after her passing on December 1, Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman remember Justice O’Connor’s contributions and talk about her legacy, sharing personal reflections as well as wisdom from Justice O’Connor that holds true today. They also look at her controversial endorsement test and how the Supreme Court has shifted – both the law and in terms of public opinion – after her retirement. Amanda and Holly also take a moment to share what we learned about you, our listeners, from this year’s Spotify Wrapped. SHOW NOTES: Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): The life of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor Here are a few remembrances of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor: by Mark Walsh for SCOTUSblog on SCOTUSblog – The New York Times’ obituary by Linda Greenhouse Justice O’Connor’s of the Supreme Court exhibit on Justice O’Connor’s life Justice O’Connor’s funeral was a private event at the Washington National Cathedral, but it is available for the public to view . Segment 2 (starting at 15:41): Justice O’Connor on church-state cases by Don Byrd for BJC’s website Amanda and Holly mentioned the following cases: (1990) (1984) (2005) was the Ten Commandments case with Justice O’Connor’s famous concurrence. to learn more about the two Ten Commandments cases and decisions from a column Holly wrote in 2005. Segment 3 (starting at 26:49): The ongoing impact of Justice O’Connor Amanda and Holly mentioned that Justice O’Connor was one of the authors of the plurality opinion in (1992) Amanda and Holly discuss this article from Linda Greenhouse for The New York Times: Segment 4 (starting at 35:31): Who are your fellow listeners? See our Spotify Wrapped on Instagram . Our most popular podcast on Spotify in 2023 was Episode 22 of Season 4, discussing the . Our most shared one was Episode 23 of Season 4 on Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. to support these conversations, and thank you for listening!
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/29184388
info_outline
S5, Ep. 09: The trouble with school vouchers (part two)
12/14/2023
S5, Ep. 09: The trouble with school vouchers (part two)
In part two of our conversation on school vouchers, Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman look at who really wants the troublesome programs, and why. They discuss how court decisions are chipping away at constitutional boundaries and dive into the policy debates and political fights over school vouchers that are pitting communities against each other. Plus, they share the origins of some of the language used in these conversations and why Texas – surprisingly – hasn’t passed a voucher program. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): Analyzing Zelman and cases chipping away at constitutional boundaries Listen to part one of this conversion in . Holly and Amanda discuss the ruling in the 2002 case of Zelman v. Simmons-Harris. You can read the opinion and dissent . They mention a trilogy of cases that came later – click the case name for more information, including podcast episodes: (2017) (2020) (2022) Segment 2 (starting at 06:04): Policy debates and political fights Holly and Amanda mentioned the following articles: by Andrew Atterbury for Politico by Nancy MacLean for The Washington Post in 2021 by Deven Carlson for Brookings was the headline of the article by Robert T. Garrett on the front page of the Dallas Morning News “ By Brian Lopez and Patrick Svitek for The Texas Tribune Amanda and Holly discussed Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s push for school vouchers in . Learn more about Pastors for Texas Children and their work countering vouchers by . Segment 3: (starting at 24:00): Additional resources on vouchers Here are some additional resources from BJC on school vouchers: by Don Byrd (March 2023) byJennifer Hawks (February 2020) by Jennifer Hawks (March 2015) You can also access additional resources on religion and public schools on our website. Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/29078608
info_outline
S5, Ep. 08: The trouble with school vouchers
12/07/2023
S5, Ep. 08: The trouble with school vouchers
School voucher programs across the country seek to divert taxpayer money to religious schools, which raises significant concerns for religious freedom advocates. In part one of this two-part episode, Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman explore the problematic issue of school vouchers. They talk about the various iterations of vouchers and the many issues they can create, including their coercive nature. Plus, they look at the first time the Supreme Court upheld a voucher program and what that ruling actually says. SHOW NOTES: Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): What is the problem with the government funding of religion? Amanda and Holly talked about the Texas chaplain bill in episode 5: Segment 2 (starting at 12:33): What are school vouchers? Segment 3: (starting at 19:37): Exploring Zelman and the chain of causation Holly and Amanda review the ruling in the 2002 case of Zelman v. Simmons-Harris. You can read the opinion and dissent . Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/28973638
info_outline
S5, Ep. 07: Barbara Jordan’s 1986 speech on church-state separation resonates today
11/30/2023
S5, Ep. 07: Barbara Jordan’s 1986 speech on church-state separation resonates today
American trailblazer Barbara Jordan delivered a powerful speech on the role of churches in shaping public policy at a BJC event in 1986. We’re bringing you this special presentation because her words resonate for our political climate today. Congresswoman Jordan notes that the institutional separation of church and state must be maintained, but that doesn’t mean the two can’t interact. She gives a strong case for Christian citizenship and being active in the policy realm. Plus, her wide-ranging Q&A covers nuclear conflicts, the “wall of separation” metaphor, and more. SHOW NOTESSegment 1 (starting at 00:34): Barbara Jordan’s 1986 speech on the church and public policy Barbara Jordan’s speech is from BJC’s 20th National Religious Liberty Conference, held in October 1986. Learn more about Barbara Jordan from the following sources: ) During her speech, Congresswoman Jordan mentions the letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists (1802). You can . Segment 2 (starting at 23:26): Q&A on nuclear conflict, the “wall of separation,” advocacy, and more The audience members who asked questions did not have microphones, so we just shared the host’s repetition of questions in this segment. In two instances, Barbara Jordan repeated the question herself (at 32:22 and 33:58). Segment 3 (starting at 40:29): Wrapping up today’s show Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/28866698
info_outline
S5, Ep. 06: RFRA at 30
11/16/2023
S5, Ep. 06: RFRA at 30
Thirty years ago today, President Bill Clinton signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) into law. It was a monumental event in religious liberty law at the time, and it remains part of an even more complex legal landscape of religious exemptions today. Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman look at the standard set by RFRA and discuss how the law has been used in cases dealing with issues ranging from sacramental drug use to application of health insurance regulations. They discuss the non-controversial applications of RFRA, too, and the search for win-win solutions to complicated situations that arise in a religiously pluralistic society. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): The need for and passage of RFRA Learn more about the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) on BJC’s website: Holly wrote a column on RFRA for Word&Way’s “A Public Witness” newsletter, and you can read it here: Read the text of the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act . Amanda mentioned these two “high water mark” cases in the period before 1990: Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972). The 1990 Employment Division v. Smith is the case often known as the “peyote case.” We played audio from Justice Antonin Scalia reading the opinion of the Court from the bench, which you can listen to and read . Watch the signing ceremony for RFRA on November 16, 1993, on the YouTube channel of the William J. Clinton Presidential Library. Holly mentioned available on our website, produced for the 20th anniversary of RFRA. Segment 2 (starting at 14:16): Twists and turns of RFRA over 30 years Amanda mentioned the 1997 case that struck down RFRA as applied to the states: City of Boerne v. Flores. The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) has the same standard as RFRA, but it has not been the subject of so many controversies. Holly and Amanda mentioned three other RFRA cases: Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal in 2006 (also known as the “UDV” case), Tanzin v. Tanvir in 2020, and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores in 2014. Holly wrote about the application of RFRA to corporations in light of the Hobby Lobby decision in 2014: J. Brent Walker, former executive director of BJC at the time, wrote about the Hobby Lobby decision in 2014: Segment 3 (starting at 32:28): The state of RFRA today Here are additional resources from BJC providing more context on the application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act: Podcasts: (2020) (2020) (2021) Video: of former BJC General Counsel Oliver “Buzz” Thomas discussing the origins of RFRA Resources from BJC on cases: (2016) (2020) Additional reading: By J. Brent Walker, 2015 by Holly Hollman, 2014 by J. Brent Walker, 2014 by Holly Hollman, 2013 by J. Brent Walker, 2013 Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/28670973
info_outline
S5, Ep. 05: An alarming push to put chaplains in public schools
11/09/2023
S5, Ep. 05: An alarming push to put chaplains in public schools
A new Texas law allows public schools to replace counselors with chaplains. In this wee’s episode, discover why Texas chaplains are voicing their opposition. Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman discuss SB 763 and their concerns about government-sponsored proselytization in public schools. They discuss the group behind this law and how Texans are resisting its implementation in their local communities. School districts have until March 1, 2024 to vote on creating chaplain programs. The only qualification to serve as a “chaplain” is to pass a criminal background check. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 1:55): The group behind the push for this law The Texas Tribune’s Robert Downen and Brian Lopez looked into Rocky Malloy’s troubling work: Segment 2 (starting at 7:07): Texas chaplains respond to this law You can read the letter from chaplains opposing chaplains in public schools . Read a story about Texans opposing the school chaplain law in the , an op-ed from two Texas clergy in the , or the transcript of a radio segment that aired on . Segment 3 (starting at 20:10): What can you do? Find more information about how to get involved . If you’re a chaplain living in or educated in Texas, add your name to the letter from Texas chaplains . The petition for Texans of faith opposing law can be accessed . The petition for people of faith across the country opposing any attempt to bring public school chaplains to their state can be found . Advocates who want information about how to make a difference in their Texas school district can . A short video about the law and how-tos on advocacy to school boards is available on . Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/28572128
info_outline
S5, Ep. 04: A pivotal day in the U.S. House
11/02/2023
S5, Ep. 04: A pivotal day in the U.S. House
Get an inside look at the U.S. House of Representatives and the challenges of Christian nationalism in this week’s episode. Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman take you behind-the-scenes of Amanda’s testimony to Congress, held on the same day lawmakers elected Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., to be Speaker of the House. They share key moments from the hearing on religious freedom around the world, including a powerful moment with Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla. Plus, they discuss troubling statements from Speaker Johnson, his embrace of Christian nationalism, and how he might navigate his new role. Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): Returning to testify before Congress Read Amanda’s written testimony . Watch a portion of Amanda’s opening statement , and on the YouTube channel of the U.S. House Oversight’s Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs. Learn more about the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom . It is also known by its initials USCIRF, pronounced “You-Surf” in conversation. The United Nations has devoted to the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which will be Dec 10, 2023. Read more about BJC’s advocacy fighting the travel ban . Segment 2 (starting at 17:34): Questions from Congress and an exchange with Rep. Maxwell Frost You can watch the exchange with Amanda and Rep. Frost . Segment 3 (starting at 30:08): Speaker Mike Johnson and Christian nationalism Amanda is quoted in this article by Nick Mordowanec for Newsweek: Amanda is quoted in this article by Peter Smith for the Associated Press: Brian Kaylor and Jeremy Fuzy of Word&Way wrote this piece on Speaker Mike Johnson for the “A Public Witness” newsletter: Dr. Kristin Du Mez did a Q&A with Politico’s Katelyn Fossett about Speaker Johnson: Dr. Andrew Whitehead and Dr. Samuel Perry wrote this piece for TIME magazine: Amanda mentioned Dr. Walter B. “Buddy” Shurden’s writings on Baptist history. of his “How We Got That Way” presentation on Baptists and religious liberty. Holly mentioned this piece in The New Yorker by David Kirpatrick on ADF: Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/28497143
info_outline
S5, Ep. 03: SCOTUS is fixated on history. What’s prayer got to do with it?
10/26/2023
S5, Ep. 03: SCOTUS is fixated on history. What’s prayer got to do with it?
Has the Supreme Court abandoned the Establishment Clause test for some sort of “history” test when applying the law? Today, we’re looking at a 2014 Supreme Court case that continues to have major implications on Supreme Court decisions: Greece v. Galloway. Amanda and Holly review this sharply divided decision on legislative prayer, explore the differences in the prayer practice of Congress and the practice in local town meetings, and look at the ongoing impact of this decision, including how it was used in the Kennedy v. Bremerton ruling in 2022. SHOW NOTES Segment 1 (starting at 00:51): What’s the difference between legislative prayer and prayer at local town meetings? Amanda and Holly discuss the decision in Kennedy v. Bremerton on . Learn more about Greece v. Galloway on our page dedicated to the case, available . It includes a link to our and other resources. BJC’s Nan Futrell Liles wrote about the constitutional anomaly in the 1983 case of Marsh v. Chambers in this column from 2013: Segment 2 (starting at 20:56): The decision and the dissent in Greece v. Galloway Read Justice Anthony Kennedy’s decision in Greece v. Galloway and Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent . Segment 3 (starting at 30:41): The problems with this new ‘history’ test Read the Kennedy v. Bremerton opinion and dissent . Amanda and Holly mentioned two recent disputes about prayer in local government meetings. Here are news articles covering them: Alabama: by John Sharp for AL.com Connecticut: by Susan Danseyar and Eric Bedner for CT Insider. Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/28429937
info_outline
S5, Ep. 02: Southern Baptist Convention president, ‘White Evangelical Racism’ author, and Respecting Religion co-host discuss Christian nationalism
10/19/2023
S5, Ep. 02: Southern Baptist Convention president, ‘White Evangelical Racism’ author, and Respecting Religion co-host discuss Christian nationalism
What happens when you talk about Christian nationalism with the president of the Southern Baptist Convention, a historian who wrote a book on white evangelical racism, and the lead organizer of Christians Against Christian Nationalism? Find out as we bring you portions of a panel conversation recorded in September during the Texas Tribune Festival. The Rev. Dr. Bart Barber, Dr. Anthea Butler, and Amanda Tyler talk about Christian nationalism’s connection to the January 6 attack, Baptist history, American history, Christian citizenship, and much more. You might hear surprising areas of agreement in this honest, in-depth, and animated conversation. Segment 1 (starting at 02:35): Introduction to today’s show We are playing excerpts from a conversation from the , recorded on September 22, 2023. The participants are: , executive director of BJC, lead organizer of Christians Against Christian Nationalism, and co-host of Respecting Religion , president of the Southern Baptist Convention and pastor of First Baptist Church of Farmersville, Texas , the Geraldine R. Segal Professor in American Social Thought and chair of the Religious Studies Department at the University of Pennsylvania. She is the author of White Evangelical Racism: The Politics of Morality in America Moderator , Texas Tribune reporter covering democracy and threats to it; previously, he covered religion at the Houston Chronicle Amanda shared a video clip of the conversation on her X account, which you can view . was written by Roger Williams in 1644. Segment 2 (starting at 11:59): The overlaps of Christian nationalism Read more about the push in Texas to install public school “chaplains” at this link: Segment 3 (starting at 19:24): The draw of Christian nationalism and Christian involvement in politics Dr. Butler’s book is . You can read the Southern Baptist Convention’s statement of faith . is about religious liberty. Segment 4 (starting at 31:23): Christian nationalism in churches and in politics Read the Christians Against Christian Nationalism statement and learn more about the campaign . Segment 5 (starting at 37:21): Christian nationalism and the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol Read the report on Christian Nationalism and the January 6, 2021, Insurrection . It was produced by BJC and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, and features contributions from Amanda Tyler and Dr. Anthea Butler, along with many others. Read the letter submitted to the January 6 Select Committee from Christian leaders . Watch Rep. Jared Huffman’s floor speech about Christian nationalism . Watch Amanda Tyler’s testimony to Congress on Christian nationalism . She discusses it in of Respecting Religion. Segment 6 (starting at 43:51): Differences in Christian nationalism and faith-based advocacy Read the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” . Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/28367225
info_outline
S5, Ep. 01: Live Q&A with Holly and Amanda
10/12/2023
S5, Ep. 01: Live Q&A with Holly and Amanda
Is the Supreme Court immune from public pressure? What is the role of the government when it comes to nondiscrimination laws, gender identity, and posting Scripture? As we begin season 5 of Respecting Religion, Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman take live questions from an audience on these topics and more. Hear their updates from the summer as they share what we can expect from this new Supreme Court term, as well as how decisions are impacting our country at all levels. SHOW NOTES: Segment 1 (starting at 1:18): Welcome back for season 5 Amanda spoke about the role of religious nationalism in the Israel-Gaza War this week at a church in Pennsylvania during a previously-scheduled talk on Christian nationalism. “I believe God weeps at the sight of God’s children killing one another, and God yearns for peace,” she said. You can watch her remarks . Amanda and Holly discussed the decisions in Groff v. DeJoy and 303 Creative v. Elenis in our . Read Holly’s column on Groff: Read more reactions to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down race-conscious college admissions from BJC’s fall magazine, including from the BJC Center for Faith, Justice and Reconciliation. Holly talked about the new Supreme Court term in this article by Pamela Manson for UPI: Amanda mentioned this op-ed she wrote for CNN: Read more about Amanda’s move to Texas in her recent column: Segment 2 (starting at 12:00): Questions from our audience The first question referred to remarks Justice Samuel Alito made about supposed hostility to religion in a 2022 speech, which you can watch . This episode was recorded during Banned Books Week, which took place from October 1-7. Learn more . Learn more about the troubling law in Texas requiring school boards to vote on creating a “chaplain” program and how you can take action on our website at Amanda mentioned from the current and former leaders of Texas Baptists denouncing “School Choice Sunday.” Read more in this article by Ken Camp for the Baptist Standard: Amanda and Holly had an in-depth discussion on the Respect for Marriage Act in . Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/28299632
info_outline
Join us for season 5 of Respecting Religion
09/29/2023
Join us for season 5 of Respecting Religion
Season 5 of the Respecting Religion podcast launches in October 2023! Tune in as BJC's Amanda Tyler and Holly Hollman discuss the Supreme Court, the continued rise of Christian nationalism, and a multitude of current issues impacting faith freedom for all. Here's a look at a few of the topics covered in season 4, including the ReAwaken America tour, federal regulations about religious expression in school, the National Prayer Breakfast, and various ways the two religion clauses of the First Amendment impact our life and protect the institutional separation of church and state. You can watch this trailer on YouTube at this link: You can find all episodes of Respecting Religion -- including transcripts -- at RespectingReligion.org or .
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/28178345
info_outline
S4, Ep. 26: SCOTUS decides Groff and 303 Creative
07/06/2023
S4, Ep. 26: SCOTUS decides Groff and 303 Creative
The Supreme Court waited until the last two days of its term to release two decisions with religious liberty implications. On this season 4 finale of the Respecting Religion podcast, Amanda and Holly look at the unanimous clarifying decision in Groff v. DeJoy and the deeply regressive decision in 303 Creative v. Elenis. They discuss the implications of both of these decisions, noting the conspicuous lack of snark in Justice Samuel Alito’s Groff decision and Justice Neil Gorsuch’s defensive attempt to make his big decision seem not all that remarkable. SHOW NOTES: Segment 1 (starting at 00:38): The clarifying decision in Groff v. DeJoy This season, Amanda and Holly previewed the Groff v. DeJoy case in and reviewed the oral arguments in . Holly released after the decision on June 29, which was mentioned in this article from SCOTUSblog: . Read the decision by Justice Samuel Alito and concurrence by Justice Sonia Sotomayor . For more resources, visit BJC’s page on the case: Segment 2 (starting at 13:08): The problems with the 303 Creative v. Elenis decision Amanda and Holly discussed the oral arguments for 303 Creative v. Elenis in – an episode we titled “hypotheticals, reeducation, and a preemptive claim.” Read the opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch and the dissent by Justice Sonia Sotomayor . Segment 3 (starting at 38:55): Saying farewell to season four Thank you to our listeners and to everyone who contributes to this program. Respecting Religion is made possible by BJC’s generous donors. You can support these conversations . Visit our website for transcripts of episodes throughout season four:
/episode/index/show/respectingreligion/id/27387558