Libsyn Directory

Why Jurors Stop Listening Even IF You Grab their Attention [Ep 176]

Release Date: 10/07/2026

Why Jurors Stop Listening Even IF You Grab their Attention [Ep 176]

Trial Lawyer Prep

Why do jurors lose track of a trial presentation even when the evidence is strong? In part one of this two-part series, we look at how attention deficits, mental fatigue, and working memory shape what jurors can absorb. We find practical ways to reduce cognitive friction in openings, direct examinations, and cross-examinations. And we discuss the idea of a juror’s limited cognitive budget, how to build in cognitive breaks, and a simple 20-minute rule for pacing testimony and presentations. The goal: make complex material easier to follow, so jurors can stay with the story and make a better...

How to Get Better Feedback From Your Focus Groups [Ep 175]

Trial Lawyer Prep

Make your next focus group actually reveal the weaknesses, blind spots, and sticky points in your case, before the defense does! Long, compound questions will kill the conversation. Keep the flow moving with shorter prompts. Silence is one of the most useful tools you have when you want honest reactions instead of rehearsed answers. These are just some of the detailed tips we cover in today’s episode, which helps you make the most of a focus group to get accurate, realistic data and feedback. The greatest strength of focus groups is their ability to reveal real weaknesses, not just...

Focus Groups Before Discovery: Vishal Shah on Case Development Strategy [Ep 174]

Trial Lawyer Prep

How does a small law firm evaluate whether to conduct a focus group? The expense, the planning and organization, the time it takes: the stakes feel higher when you have a more nimble organization. Vishal Shah is a plaintiff-side employment lawyer in Boston, MA, who left big law to open his own boutique firm in 2023. He thus knows first-hand the importance of balancing the bottom line and making smart choices for how his firm operates. And he's here to tell you: you rarely get a better bang for your buck than through a focus group. Because it's not just about the value to that particular case,...

Trial Prep Under Pressure: 3 Days to a $3.4M Verdict [Ep 173]

Trial Lawyer Prep

Perhaps a short trial can be better? When you had planned for a five day trial, and then the first morning in the courtroom, the judge announces that the case will be completed in three days. Hard stop. No exceptions. Is it a scramble and a panic? Or maybe, could it be a blessing? In this day and age especially, the last thing we want to do is bore our jurors, throw too much information at them and expect them to keep up. Attention spans are shorter and people are easily distracted, but even when looking at it objectively, can we really expect someone to hear and absorb each and every sentence...

Identify a Judge’s Trial Persona Before you Walk into the Courtroom [Ep 172]

Trial Lawyer Prep

Judge rules can make or break your trial, and most lawyers are looking at the wrong document first. If you are headed to trial, this episode shows why the judge’s trial rules, schedule, and persona matter more than simply memorizing jury instructions. I talk about how a trial consultation exposed major surprises in a judge’s courtroom procedures, including half-day sessions, skipped Fridays, limited jury-selection time, and strict expectations that could completely reshape the order of proof, witness strategy, and expert costs. This episode previously aired on the podcast in 2024, and I'm...

AI During Trial: Jury & Verdict. Part Two with Michelle Gessner [Ep 171]

Trial Lawyer Prep

In our last episode, we learned about Michelle Gessner's recent trial in North Carolina, where she was forced to pivot from a regular audio/video presentation, using modern technology, to a courtroom with no microphones, no TVs, no projectors and a single power outlet (already claimed by the clerk and the court reporter!). Michelle used AI to help adapt to this unexpected turn of events, asking it how to craft a visual presentation under these unique circumstances. Today, we learn how it unfolded. You could feel the courtroom change as the case progressed, and this was a quick trial: starting...

AI for Winning Courtroom Visuals: Case Study with Michelle Gessner [Ep 170]

Trial Lawyer Prep

My guest today, Michelle Gessner, joined the podcast back in December of 2024, where we discussed her $21 million verdict against Wells Fargo. Today she's back with the story of a recent verdict success in North Carolina, which suddenly hit an unexpected twist. The case was planned out to make use of high tech video equipment and software, as you would find in a standard, modern equipped court room. But then, it was moved to courtroom that had no technology; in fact, only a single outlet with extension cords. No microphones, no TVs, no projectors. Just old-school visual tools: easels,...

Juror Attention Spans: The Science Every Trial Lawyer Needs to Know [Ep 169]

Trial Lawyer Prep

What if our assumptions about modern attention spans aren't accurate? We are all used to hearing that people have much, much shorter attention spans these days, thanks to social media, clickbait, algorithms, and a constant barrage of information. While those things certainly represent a major shift in our day to day reality over the past 15+ years, that doesn't necessarily mean that we're paying less attention than we used to. In fact, it's more of a rewiring of our brains, thanks to technology, leading to a state of continuous partial attention. Why is this important to trial law, case...

Using Case Framing in Discovery with Tony Edwards [Ep 168]

Trial Lawyer Prep

For an effective discovery, case framing should start as early as possible. But be ready to pivot! Don't let the other side get the jump on you in framing a case, and put you in catch-up mode from the start. You need to start framing a case at intake, especially for higher-value cases. But, as our guest points out today, you also need to be ready and willing to pivot, should new facts arise, or if a new framing will in fact strengthen your case. Tony Edwards is a personal injury lawyer in Oklahoma, and shares stories and wisdom from his decades of experience. We talk about a trucking case...

Trial Strategy in Action: Timelines, Sequencing, and What Wins [Ep 167]

Trial Lawyer Prep

There is a crucial difference between timelines and sequences, and if you want jurors to see your case as plainly as you see it, you need to pay close attention. Today we explore not just how timelines help jurors understand the case quickly, but why that is: the psychology and brain science behind retaining information. Timelines are a curated visual picture of the case, sequencing is about the order of presenting evidence. Similar, yet each with their own distinct psychologies. I know, not all lawyers use timelines, but they can be very effective, and focus groups help you recognize and fine...

More Episodes

Why do jurors lose track of a trial presentation even when the evidence is strong?

In part one of this two-part series, we look at how attention deficits, mental fatigue, and working memory shape what jurors can absorb.

We find practical ways to reduce cognitive friction in openings, direct examinations, and cross-examinations. And we discuss the idea of a juror’s limited cognitive budget, how to build in cognitive breaks, and a simple 20-minute rule for pacing testimony and presentations.

The goal: make complex material easier to follow, so jurors can stay with the story and make a better connection with you.

And stay tuned for part two, where we'll focus on structuring presentations that are designed for short-term memory.

Have a trial or mediation coming up and want to test with a focus group? Book a free consultation call with Elizabeth to learn more:

www.calendly.com/elizabethlarrick

In this episode, we cover:

How to use clear language and well-structured testimony help preserve jurors’ cognitive capacity.
Why pauses, movement, and visual transitions can act as cognitive breaks and help regain attention.
Mark Lanier’s “three points plus a conclusion” approach, which can give jurors a mental reset and improve retention.
How to break an hour-long direct examination into smaller segments, to help jurors and the judge follow the progress.
What physical signs to look for in jurors, such as furrowed brows or visible disengagement.

You can also watch today's episode on my YouTube Channel:

Why Jurors Stop Listening Even IF You Grab their Attention [Ep 176]

And refer to Episode 169 (Juror Attention Spans: The Science Every Trial Lawyer Needs to Know) for more fascinating insights on brain science and juries!

Follow and Review:

We’d love for you to follow us if you haven’t yet. Click that purple '+' in the top right corner of your Apple Podcasts app. We’d love it even more if you could drop a review or 5-star rating over on Apple Podcasts. Simply select “Ratings and Reviews” and “Write a Review” then a quick line with your favorite part of the episode. It only takes a second and it helps spread the word about the podcast.

Have a trial or mediation coming up and want to test with a focus group? Book a free consultation call with Elizabeth to learn more:

www.calendly.com/elizabethlarrick

Don’t miss out on the Trial Lawyer Prep Newsletter that is delivered right to your email with extra tips and ‘how to’ information. Join the newsletter here:

www.larricklawfirm.com/newsletter

TOPICS