info_outline
Season 4, #5- Be Curiously Different
02/10/2026
Season 4, #5- Be Curiously Different
What happens when you’re tasked with reinventing an economy—and later find yourself building investment systems in countries where the rulebook doesn’t exist? That’s the story of Thomas Nastas, this month’s guest on the Founder’s Sandbox. His journey from Michigan’s automotive belt to the front lines of the former USSR is a masterclass in resilience, creativity, and leadership under pressure. In this episode, host Brenda McCabe interviews Thomas Nastas, a seasoned board director with over 30 years of experience in international markets. They discuss Thomas's journey from Michigan to various emerging markets, his innovative approaches, and the differences in governance roles between the U.S. and international markets. They also touch on the importance of scaling businesses through customer revenue, the concept of resilience in entrepreneurship, and the significance of purpose-driven enterprises. Transcript: 00:04 Welcome back to the Founder's Sandbox. I am Brenda McCabe, the host of this monthly podcast where we are now in our fourth season. And the podcast is really oriented towards 00:33 growth scale companies, board directors, and VCs that work in the typically the scaling um of companies and the ecosystem. And I am absolutely delighted to bring a guest in this to this month, these podcasts, Thomas Nastas, who has been serving in international boards of directors and US boards of directors. 01:02 for over 30 years. um His international background is quite um pioneering. And we're going to get into the material here, but we're going to learn about his experience out in Russia and Katastrofgan, um Africa. And Thomas and I met through um board prospects. We are both um 01:30 quite unusual candidates for boards of directors in the uh common way of recruiting board directors in the United States, prior CEOs. We do have an extensive background in international governance. And when I got to speak with Thomas um over the last couple of months and learning how he brought the board governance oh practices 01:59 from the United States to Emerging Marcus just fascinated me and I ask him to be a guest here. So Thomas, I want to thank you for joining me today in the Founder's Sandbox. Well, thank you. Appreciate the invitation. So um I briefly touched on you are uh a board director with uh lots of international experience. um 02:29 You also have a lot of em experience at emerging markets. um So Russia, Kazakhstan, Africa, and think it's East Africa, and some South American markets. um You've served on over, I want to say, is it 50? As companies, right? And em for my listeners, independent board directors is a term that we use here in the United States. 02:56 whereas in other markets, they're called non-executive directors. So, NED. So, Thomas has been in an NED role in over 50 companies. And we're gonna get into how that's kind of different em to what you have traditionally here in the United States. You are a midwesterner, just like me. My family. You're from Michigan, um big automobile industry. em 03:25 beachhead here in the United States. I'm from Ohio, so we've heard a lot of us, I think some of the experiences of being uh born and raised and educated in the Midwest, uh bringing in uh that Midwestern spirit, as I say, kindred spirits from the Midwest. And finally, um the em other area that Thomas is particularly experienced in, um and we share this 03:55 as well as you work in SMEs, small and medium-sized enterprises, but in the international markets, which is, again, it's fascinating. So we have a lot to unpack and unpeel today in today's podcast. So Thomas, could you just talk about your origin story? mean, what, you were really young, you were in Michigan. What made you pack up and actually go off to Russia? 04:24 Give us a little bit of your origin story. Well, I didn't go directly from Michigan to Russia. uh From Michigan to Canada, to Europe, to Africa, and then to Russia, and then to Kazakhstan. oh So it little bit, it was kind of like baby steps. A little bit of background on how I ever got involved in this is I'm a mechanical engineer. oh 04:52 by training, you know, I got an MBA and worked in, you know, Ford Motor Company and automotive suppliers. And, um, and then many decades ago, um, we had a new governor in Michigan and, um, he, like all other governors, even, even still now today said that, you know, the Michigan economy is dominated by the auto industry, you know, and 05:21 And it goes up and down and up and down and up and down. And we need to diversify the economy. Right? Right. So this governor, name was Bob Blanchard. He put together a program uh in the sort of the mid eighties on how to go about diversifying the Michigan economy. And he put together a bunch of blue ribbon boards of CEOs of, you know, Ford and GM and 05:51 Chrysler and you know, the major automotive suppliers and energy suppliers and utility companies, et cetera, et cetera. And I was part of a lesser like, um, I guess sort of like a sort of like foot soldiers of looking at what are the problems of companies of developing their second generation products. they're all established companies. Okay. They want to establish, they want to, you know, they want to create their 06:20 sort of like their second major, second generation product. And we started to look at it, what are the problems that these companies experience? And many of them were serving the auto industry and the auto industry historically has grown like two or 3 % per year. So if you're a traditional automotive supplier in that particular marketplace, that's what your growth is limited to. And if that's what your growth is, 06:49 It's difficult to raise outside capital. Got it. So we started looking at what are the problems of companies financing this particular area. And we, myself and I know there's probably half a dozen dozen other folks who were part of this, um, this sort of foot soldiers committee. We looked at the marketplace. We took sort of a market approach rather than a technical or engineering approach. What is, what's, what is. 07:18 What specifically is issue? And what we learned, and I'll sort of fast forward, is that there are a lot of medium growth companies at this time in Michigan, but also throughout the United States, that will never be big enough, fast enough ever to go public. Got it. And at that time, the epicenter of venture capital was in Route 128, which is in the Boston area, and Silicon Valley was developing, but it was small compared to what was going on in Boston. 07:48 So if you had that kind of a growth rate, you couldn't raise any capital, all right? Number one. Number two is there's a lot of family-held businesses that might be fast growth, but they don't want any outside. They don't want any non-family members involved in the business. And third is there's what we call sort of technology-rich companies that have a lot of IP. 08:17 So they're IP rich, but they're asset poor. So those companies in turn had difficulty of raising either equity capital because again, in the Midwest there was one venture fund in Michigan at that particular time. And it'd be difficult to be able to access debt financing because again, you don't have assets that you can collateralize. So we looked at saying, how could we solve these three particular problems? 08:47 Um, and we sort of stumbled upon the use and application of royalty based structures. Okay. Actually finance these companies because royalty based structures, which have been used for decades in the creative industries, being music, movies, uh, the book business, and to a large extent also in a pharmaceutical industry. um 09:15 Was potentially a solution because you could put money into a company. You're not, you don't have an equity position in a company. 09:24 If there, you've got a higher rate of return than debt. So you can get sort of equity like returns and you're generating cash flow, you're generating returns that you can distribute back to your investors pretty quick. eh So my, so another friend, another guy who was on this committee, we said we ought to create a fund to do this. And we created a royalty based fund, um, to, um 09:51 To do this, we raised $2 million in the state of Michigan, raised $2 million. At that time, there was no word of angel investing. was just rich, rich guys. Okay. And we started making investments in, family held businesses and companies that had raised some venture capital. Uh, but they wanted to embark on developing their second generation products. That was your thesis then, right? Yeah. 10:21 And also companies, again, that were sort of tied to the auto industry. So we started making investments and in some cases we were investing in a specific product. Yeah. Some cases, a line of products. In some cases, you know, we had royalties on the company's entire, you know, revenue. So it was just depend on situation, on situational. And we did this for a couple of years and we were making investments anywhere between a hundred K and up to 700 K, which was big. 10:50 for a $4 million fund. Yeah, yeah, quite big. And it was interesting that sometimes when you make investments, you sort of hit the bullseye. And what I mean by that is a couple of the companies that we invested in sort of hit the bullseye on their products and they started to grow exponentially. 11:19 And they said, Hey, look, we're sending you guys, you know, quite a bit of cash. We'd like to reinvest this cash back into the business. So we would like to do is we would like to buy out your role of the claim. And one point I want to make is when we were doing these transactions, we were investing in perpetuity. was no, you know, like you get too money back or turn it was in, it was in perpetuity because we wanted it to look like. 11:49 in some ways, equity, which is not limiting the upside. And if you, you know, if you say two times or three times, you're limiting, you're limiting your upside and you know, could have a whole mess of failures and you you accomplish not very much anyway. So we said, yeah, you guys could buy us out, but we don't cash. We want to sell you our royalty claim for equity. They went, oh, well, that's kind of interesting. 12:18 Or in these states, like kind of a warrant? Sorry? Like a warrant? Well, not really a Because again, none of this was pre-planned. was spontaneous. Serendipity. So, you know, we looked at potentially, you know, there's a number of different inputs into figuring out how much equity we were going to basically buy for a royalty claim. it went, again, different companies. It was different amounts. And so. 12:48 We were then on the cap table as an equity investor. And some of these investments either went public on NASDAQ or they were acquired by a much bigger entity. So we sort of learned that, ah, gee, know, this is not only a way to finance underserved and underfinance entrepreneurs that 13:17 the venture capital model can't serve, which it still doesn't do even now. Okay. uh It's also a way to sort of manage the risk return relationship because when you make an investment, you never know what's going to happen. So it was a way to sort of manage that risk return relationship. I start writing articles on this particular financing technique saying, here's a way to finance niches that the venture capital industry um 13:48 can't serve. wrote an article for the Canadian Venture Capital Journal, which at that time was part of a guy by the name of Stan Pratt, who had a company called Venture Economics in Boston. They published, you know, the U.S. Venture Capital Journal, the Canadian, the European, the Asian, the Latin American. I wrote it for the Canadian Venture Capital Journal. And then I got a call from the Devolk Bank of Canada. 14:17 which is based in Montreal. And, um, this is getting sort of how things go. And again, I'm coming from outside the industry. Okay. I'm going outside the venture capital industry. never had any, you know, I was not a finance major. You know, I was mechanical engineering at an MBA in marketing. So I was not a finance guy. You know, never had a finance background, never had a finance. 14:45 You know, upbringing never worked in finance and operations. And so the guys at the Devol and Baker of Jamaica and Devol and Baker of Canada said, Hey, look, you know, this sort of this niche that you're financing, um, we've got this niche too in Canada. And we have got probably even a bigger problem than you do in the States because the Canadian public markets. 15:13 are less efficient than they are in the United States. Meaning, if a company wants to go public, it's got to be bigger in terms of revenues and profits than in the States. And we think this might be a way to help bridge companies so they could get bigger faster. And the bank was actually called the Federal Business Development Bank of Canada. Now it's called just the Business Development Bank of Canada. 15:39 And they were doing venture capital, they were doing asset-based lending, were doing cashflow lending, they were doing leasing, they were doing every single vertical within sort of the finance chain, but they weren't doing this. So I went at the Montreal and I talked to them, the CEO and the people on the board of directors and operations people and blah, blah, blah. And it was interesting. this is part of what one question which you asked about resilience is that 16:08 They said to me, you know, this is quite interesting, but you know, you're from Michigan, you know, you're, you know, I mean, we're in Montreal. Okay. I mean, this was a big international city and you're from Detroit. Okay. And you're sort of like a little cowboy. Yeah, you're an outsider. And I said, well, yeah, I said, well, you know, maybe that's true. Maybe it isn't true. And I said, you know, how about if we just create a fund? And they said, well, no, we don't think so. And blah, blah, blah. 16:36 And I said, well, I tell you what, how about we do this? I said, how about we put together, I put together a, say a three or four day training program for your investment officers. Because typically an investment officer, he's he or she sees sort of a business plan, you know, where the growth is like, like this and not like this, they take it and they throw it in the trash can. Okay. 17:04 And they recognize that they said, yeah, our guys, they're women. just take it. throw in a trash can. So I said, how about put together a training program over, you know, like a three day period or five day period and go through, you know, how you go about doing diligence. Cause the due diligence is different. I organize structure, the investment, you know, how you, um, establish at least some measures of covenants and protection, et cetera, et cetera. 17:33 And they said, okay. So, you know, like six months later, I went up to Montreal, put together this three day program, stayed in Montreal. And after this, said, well, gee, we think you got half of a brain. And they said, yeah, we'd like to create a fund. do it. We created a hundred million dollar Canadian dollar, which at that time was 80 million bucks. Okay. Fun to do this. Okay. 18:02 And it was focused on mainly just, you know, sort of like factory automation, logistics companies and transportation companies. And again, this is sort of before. So, mean, there was, you know, computer software, there's computer peripherals, there was machine vision, but there wasn't really very much, you know, what we call sort of hard tech or deep tech that exists now. Okay. Right. And I see it in series A. 18:27 and be financing, right? Yeah, we would call that a little bit. actually didn't call it at that particular time. So I had an office in Detroit and I created, you know, three offices, one in Montreal, one in Toronto and one in Vancouver. And I'll fast forward and the guys in the Canadian venture capital journal said to their editors in the UK and then also to the ones in Asia and in Europe. 18:56 And they published it and the editor at the UK venture capital journal said, Hey, I think, know, this thing would really resonate because at that time in Europe, the financing structure was mainly management buyouts and management buy ins. There was a little bit of venture capital, but not very much. Okay. Yeah. And this is like in the eighties, the early eighties. This is in the eighties and nineties. Correct. So, um, you know, and I finance out of my own pocket. 19:26 You know, didn't know anybody in Europe or UK. went over there at my own pocket, talked to people, met a lot of variety of people and fast forward, created two funds in Europe. One, where the lead investor was a European commission, which is quite unusual for being an American fund manager. And two, with a French group called Financer Saint Dominique, which at that time was part of Canada Nationale. And now they, they were bought out. They are now part of what's called a bank called Bank Nexus. 19:55 And we created two funds, one for all one patent European fund, which at that time was just West Europe is for, you know, central and East Europe. And also one for France and Germany. And so I set up offices that are going to have teams of people that worked for me in Detroit, Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver, Paris, Luxembourg. And I lived in those two cities and, and, and it was good kick. And I kept on writing more more articles about this financing technique. 20:23 And I started to tailor them a little bit to the emerging world. Um, and, um, the folks at IFC, which is the international finance corporation, which is the investment arm of the world bank. Right about it. It contacted me. said, Hey, look, we think some of these things might work in Africa. And I said, well, you know, why do you think that? I said, well, you're right. That is as good for countries where. 20:51 They have the capital markets are less efficient than in the States. In Africa that time, there ain't no capital markets. So ultimately we created three funds in Africa, a $285 million fund for all sub-Saturn Africa. Uh, and then sort of move more in sort of traditional venture financing of fund to funds in East Africa, Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania. 21:18 And then a $30 million private equity fund uh in, South Africa. So I created offices, you know, hired people, trained people, learn to make investments in, you know, these African countries and offices in Nairobi, Kampala, which is a capital of Uganda, Cape Town and in, uh, Johannesburg and, uh, the South Africa, they're all interesting. South African was quite interesting because during the days of apartheid. 21:47 South African companies were basically shut off from the world markets. We couldn't invest their cashflow into, know, external to basically Africa. Okay. So they were buying companies like a beer company, SAB would buy up or create a line of pizza restaurants, for example, or, you know, you know, different kinds of restaurants or logistics companies or transportation companies or dry cleaners or other beverage companies, et cetera, et cetera. 22:16 Because they had this cash and they wanted to reinvest it. had to deploy. And then when apartheid ended and they could now start to export capital, they wanted to spin off all these sort of like these...
/episode/index/show/99e2d44c-dfe8-433f-8679-fe45e1d8a68d/id/40026105